Global Constitutionalism Without Global Democracy (?)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
LAW 2016/21 Department of Law Global Constitutionalism without Global Democracy (?) Edited by Claudio Corradetti and Giovanni Sartor European University Institute Department of Law GLOBAL CONSTITUTIONALISM WITHOUT GLOBAL DEMOCRACY (?) Edited by Claudio Corradetti and Giovanni Sartor EUI Working Paper LAW 2016/21 This text may be downloaded for personal research purposes only. Any additional reproduction for other purposes, whether in hard copy or electronically, requires the consent of the editors. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the editors, the title, the working paper or other series, the year, and the publisher. ISSN 1725-6739 © Claudio Corradetti and Giovanni Sartor, 2016 Printed in Italy European University Institute Badia Fiesolana I-50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy www.eui.eu cadmus.eui.eu Editors' contact details Claudio Corradetti Associate Professor of Political Philosophy of Human Rights University of Rome “Tor Vergata” Rome, Italy [email protected] Giovanni Sartor Professor of Legal Informatics and Legal Theory European University Institute Florence, Italy [email protected] Abstract The contributions in this volume investigate interconnected aspects of the democratic deficit in global constitutionalism. The commonly shared question is the following: to what extent, if any, a global (or cosmopolitan) shift of international law can proceed absent a transnational democratic check? Some scholars are convinced that this is a real problem since that a ‘division of labour’ is to be recognized between national and regional/international legal levels, only the first needing a democratic legitimacy. The contributors to this volume, on the contrary tend to share the view that detaching the production of international law from constituent will, as well as from a democratic framework, can indeed undermine constitutional legitimacy. Furthermore, this may open the way to forms of domination that affect also state’s democratic institutions from within. What is the way out from this deadlock? How is it possible to tame global constitutionalism in order to avoid a global Leviathan? The collection of essays here presented attempts to conceptualize some of the central challenges affecting contemporary patterns of legal dispersion and fragmentation. They follow a conceptual-historical thread which starts with a modern Kantian understanding of the problem, and unfolds into the discussion of issues of constitutional pluralism, institutional legitimacy and the risk of tyranny. The volume includes analyses of the role of China and the EU, two of the most important actors, even though perhaps at the opposite pole of the global constitutional project. Keywords Cosmopolitanism, global constitutionalism, legitimacy, sovereignty, democratic deficit Table of contents Claudio Corradetti and Giovanni Sartor INTRODUCTION: GLOBAL CONSTITUTIONALISM WITHOUT GLOBAL DEMOCRACY (?) .................................................... 1 SECTION I. HISTORICAL ROOTS AND CONTEMPORARY TRENDS IN GLOBAL CONSTITUTIONALISM ................................ 3 Claudio Corradetti CONSTRUCTIVISM IN COSMOPOLITAN LAW: KANT’S RIGHT TO VISIT ............................................................................. 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Starting points for the justification of the cosmopolitan right: on the inherent connection between (external) freedom and possession within the original community ..................................................................................................................... 7 The right to visit as a constructivist principle of cosmopolitan law .................................................................................... 10 Thinking cosmopolitan through the ‘critical’ public use of reason ..................................................................................... 15 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Claudio Corradetti THINKING WITH KANT “BEYOND” KANT: ACTUALIZING SOVEREIGNTY AND CITIZENSHIP IN THE TRANSNATIONAL SPHERE ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Kant’s sovereignty dilemma ............................................................................................................................................... 23 “Constitutional mindset” and the progression towards cosmopolitan peace ....................................................................... 26 The “general united will” as a transcendental constituent power for the cosmopolitan rule of law .................................... 33 Double sovereignties and plural citizenries: a rejoinder to a (virtual) ‘family quarrel’ between Kant and Habermas?....... 35 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Dimitri Van den Meerssche EXPLORING CONSTITUTIONAL PLURALISM(S): AN ONTOLOGICAL ROADMAP ............................................................... 39 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 39 MacCormick and the pluralization of constitutionalism ..................................................................................................... 41 The Hartian origins of constitutional pluralism ............................................................................................................. 42 From legal to constitutional pluralism ........................................................................................................................... 43 The end of sovereignty .................................................................................................................................................. 44 MacCormick’s constitutional paradigm in the light of constitutional theory ................................................................. 45 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................................... 47 The constitutionalization of pluralism ................................................................................................................................. 48 Constitutionalism as hermeneutic for conflict-resolution .............................................................................................. 48 The rationalist approach: cosmopolitan constitutionalism ............................................................................................. 52 Framing the democratic deficit of Constitutional Pluralism ................................................................................................ 55 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................... 57 SECTION II. DEMOCRATIC OR CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY? .................................................................................... 61 Aoife O'Donoghue TYRANNY AND THE ANXIETIES OF LAW BEYOND THE STATE ........................................................................................ 61 Classical Greek tyranny ...................................................................................................................................................... 63 Arendt and tyranny ............................................................................................................................................................. 67 Understanding tyranny? ...................................................................................................................................................... 70 Rule of law and global constitutionalism ............................................................................................................................ 71 Tyranny, international rule of law ....................................................................................................................................... 76 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................................................................... 77 Pavlos Eleftheriadis INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AND LEGITIMACY ........................................................................................................ 79 Global justice ...................................................................................................................................................................... 79 Illegitimacy as injustice ...................................................................................................................................................... 82 Cosmopolitan legitimacy .................................................................................................................................................... 85 Legitimacy and international law .......................................................................................................................................