DOCSLIB.ORG

Determination of Threatened Status for Castilleja Levisecta

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Determination of Threatened Status for Castilleja Levisecta 31740 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations September 8, 1995, except for condition 3. On page 328, first column, Lacey address (telephone 360/753± Nos. 9 pertaining to non-VOC and non- instruction 13 is corrected to read ``13. 9440). NOX pollutants and expiration date of Section 101±38.401±1 is amended by SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the plan approval. removing the introductory text, (ii) Additional Material. removing paragraph (b), redesignating Background (A) Remainder of the Commonwealth paragraph (c) as paragraph (b), and Castilleja levisecta (golden of Pennsylvania's December 8, 1995 revising paragraph (a) introductory text paintbrush) was first collected near Mill submittal. to read as follows:'' Plain, Washington, by Thomas Jefferson (B) Additional material submitted by Howell in 1880 and was described by Pennsylvania dated May 23, 1997, Dated: June 5, 1997. Jesse More Greenman in 1898 providing clarifying information related Sharon A. Kiser, (Greenman 1898). A perennial herb of to Pennzoil Products Company plan FAR Secretariat. the figwort family (Scrophulariaceae), C. approval. [FR Doc. 97±15229 Filed 6±10±97; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820±34±P levisecta typically has 1 to 15 erect to [FR Doc. 97±15102 Filed 6±10±97; 8:45 am] spreading unbranched stems, reaches a BILLING CODE 6560±50±P height of 30 centimeters (cm) (12 inches DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (in)), and is covered with soft, sticky hairs. The lower leaves are entire and GENERAL SERVICES Fish and Wildlife Service narrowly pointed; the upper leaves are ADMINISTRATION broader, usually with one to three pairs 50 CFR Part 17 of short lateral lobes on the distal end. 41 CFR Part 101±38 The flower, mostly hidden by the RIN 1018±AC52 [FPMR Amendment G±111] overlapping bracts, has a calyx 15 to 18 millimeters (mm) (0.6 to 0.7 in) long and RIN 3090±AG26 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of deeply cleft, and a corolla 20 to 23 mm Motor Vehicles Threatened Status for Castilleja (0.8 to 0.9 in) long, with a slender galea levisecta (Golden Paintbrush) (concave upper lip) three to four times AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide the length of the unpouched lower lip Policy, GSA. AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973). It is ACTION: Final rule; correction. Interior. distinguished from the other Castilleja ACTION: Final rule. species within its range by brilliant SUMMARY: This document contains golden to yellow floral bracts. The plant SUMMARY: corrections to a final rule published in The U.S. Fish and Wildlife flowers from April to June. When not the Federal Register on Friday, January Service (Service) determines threatened flowering, the plant is less conspicuous. 3, 1997, 62 FR 322. FPMR Amendment status pursuant to the Endangered The species may be semi-parasitic like G±111, which governs the management Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), other members of the genus Castilleja, of motor vehicles. for the plant Castilleja levisecta (golden possibly requiring a host plant for EFFECTIVE DATE: January 3, 1997. paintbrush). This species once occurred seedling development in its native from Oregon to Vancouver Island in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: habitat (Heckard 1962, Sheehan and Sharon A. Kiser, Federal Acquisition British Columbia, Canada. Ten Sprague 1984). However, greenhouse Policy Division (202±501±216). populations of this plant now exist in experiments indicate it does not require open grasslands ranging from south of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In rule a host to survive and flower (Wentworth Olympia in Thurston County, document 97±52 appearing at 62 FR 1994). Washington, north through the Puget 322, GSA revised Part 101±38. This The plant tends to grow in clumps. Trough to southwest British Columbia, document corrects three errors. One genetic individual may consist of 1 Canada. Threats to the species include to 15 stems, making the determination Corrections competition with encroaching native of exact numbers of individual plants in and non-native plant species; habitat § 101.38 [Corrected] the field difficult. The number of stems modification through succession in the per plant varies site to site. In addition, 1. On page 324, second column, absence of fire; and grazing by ``PART 101±38ÐMOTOR EQUIPMENT researchers have used a variety of herbivores. Direct human-caused threats census methods over the years. MANAGEMENT'' is corrected to read include conversion of habitat for ``PART 101±38ÐMOTOR VEHICLE Therefore, population estimates can residential and commercial vary and a consistent approach is MANAGEMENT.'' development, conversion to agriculture, 2. On page 325, the table in 101± needed. Experimentally designed and possible damage associated with sampling surveys have been conducted 38.104(b)(3) is corrected by adding the road maintenance. This rule implements following footnotes. where individual plants were tagged the Federal protections afforded by the and counted (Wentworth 1994). Year to ``1 Established by section 502 of the Act for this plant. year variation in population densities Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings EFFECTIVE DATE: July 11, 1997. Act (89 Stat. 902, 15 U.S.C. 2002) and the can be high (G. Douglas, Conservation Secretary of Transportation. ADDRESSES: The complete file for this Data Center, British Columbia Ministry 2 Established by the Secretary of rule is available for inspection, by of Environment, Lands and Parks, pers. Transportation and mandated by Executive appointment, during normal business comm. 1996; Wentworth 1994). Order 12003 through fiscal year 1981 and by hours at the Western Washington Office, Castilleja levisecta occurs in open Executive Order 12375 beginning in fiscal North Pacific Coast Ecoregion, U.S. Fish grasslands at elevations below 100 year 1982. and Wildlife Service, 510 Desmond meters (m) (328 feet (ft)) around the 3 Fleet average fuel economy for light Drive S.E., Suite 101, Lacey, trucks is the combined fleet average fuel periphery of the Puget Trough. Most economy for all 4x2 and 4x4 light trucks. Washington 98503±1273. populations occur on glacially derived 4 Requirements not yet established by the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: soils, either gravelly glacial outwash or Secretary of Transportation.'' Dave Frederick, Supervisor, at the above clayey glacio-lacustrine sediments Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 112 / Wednesday, June 11, 1997 / Rules and Regulations 31741 (Sheehan and Sprague 1984, Gamon In British Columbia, Canada, 2 on a 0.04-ha (0.10-acre) site (Gamon 1995). Associated species include populations exist on islands off of the 1995). The population declined from Festuca idahoensis, F. rubra, Camassia southern coast of Vancouver Island between 500 and 1,000 plants in the quamash, Holcus lanatus, Achillea (Ryan and Douglas 1994). A historic early 1980's, to 120 plants in 1993 millefolium, Pteridium aquilinum, Vicia population at Beacon Hill in Victoria on (Gamon 1993; Fayette Krause, The spp., and Bromus spp. (Gamon 1995). Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Nature Conservancy, in litt., 1994), and Frequent, low intensity fires can be Canada, has been surveyed annually currently harbors about 230 individuals important in maintaining habitat for from 1991 through 1996. Three plants (Gamon 1995). This State-owned plant species such as C. levisecta. were observed in 1991 but subsequent historic site is managed as a park for Historically, periodic fires in the Puget surveys have not found any plants and recreational use (Ken Hageman, Fort Trough were instrumental in the site is presumed to be extirpated Casey State Park Manager, Washington maintaining native grassland habitat by (Gamon 1995; G. Douglas, pers. comm. Department of Parks, pers. comm. 1994). limiting successional encroachment of 1996). A third Whidbey Island population of trees and shrubs (Agee 1993, Kruckeberg The southernmost population of Castilleja levisecta occurs on and 1991, Sheehan and Sprague 1984). Castilleja levisecta occurs at the Rocky adjacent to the Bocker property. This Historically, Castilleja levisecta has Prairie site south of Olympia, in population consists of 3 coloniesÐ1 been reported from over 30 sites in the Thurston County, Washington. The site colony is 60×150 m (197×492 ft) on the Puget Trough of Washington and British is owned by the Washington property, a second colony is adjacent to Columbia, and as far south as the Department of Natural Resources and is the property in a 4 m2 (43 ft2) area, and Willamette Valley of Oregon (Sheehan designated as a Natural Area Preserve a third colony is located near the and Sprague 1984, Gamon 1995). In that is managed primarily for protection ``Admiral's'' house and covers an area of 1984, the Service granted funding to the of C. levisecta and Aster curtus (white- 4.5×9 m (15×30 ft). In 1996, 306 Washington Natural Heritage Program topped aster), and conservation of the individual plants existed (Wentworth, (Washington Department of Natural remnant native grasslands of Festuca pers. comm. 1996), down from an Resources) to conduct an assessment of idahoenis (Idaho fescue) (J. Gamon, estimated 1,200 plants in the mid-1980's the status of the species throughout its pers. comm. 1996). In 1983, the time of (Krause, in litt. 1994). The property is range. The plant was found to be the last complete census, 15,000 plants owned by Seattle Pacific University and extirpated from more than 20 historic were sporadically distributed is used for environmental education sites (Sheehan and Sprague 1984, throughout the 15-hectare (ha) (37-acre) courses (Keith Ludemann, Gamon 1995). Many populations were site. A fire in 1985 reduced the Environmental Education Supervisor, found to be extirpated due to conversion southernmost patch of C. levisecta, and Bocker Environmental Preserve, pers. of habitat to agricultural, residential, in 1991 the total population was comm. 1992), but no covenants or other and commercial development. In estimated to be about 7,000 plants (R. restrictions on the property exist that Oregon, C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West-Side Prairies & Woodlands
    Washington State Natural Regions Beyond the Treeline: Beyond the Forested Ecosystems: Prairies, Alpine & Drylands WA Dept. of Natural Resources 1998 West-side Prairies & Woodlands Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems West-side Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems in Grey San Juan Island Prairies 1. South Puget Sound prairies & oak woodlands 2. Island / Peninsula coastal prairies & woodlands Olympic Peninsula 3. Rocky balds Prairies South Puget Prairies WA GAP Analysis project 1996 Oak Woodland & Prairie Ecosystems San Juan West-side Island South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Oak Woodland & Prairie Prairies Ecosystems in Grey Grasslands dominated by Olympic • Grasses Peninsula Herbs Prairies • • Bracken fern South • Mosses & lichens Puget Prairies With scattered shrubs Camas (Camassia quamash) WA GAP Analysis project 1996 •1 South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Mounded prairie Some of these are “mounded” prairies Mima Mounds Research Natural Area South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Scattered shrubs Lichen mats in the prairie Serviceberry Cascara South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems As unique ecosystems they provide habitat for unique plants As unique ecosystems they provide habitat for unique critters Camas (Camassia quamash) Mazama Pocket Gopher Golden paintbrush Many unique species of butterflies (Castilleja levisecta) (this is an Anise Swallowtail) Photos from Dunn & Ewing (1997) •2 South Puget Sound Prairie Ecosystems Fire is
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor's Checkerspot (Euphydryas Editha Taylori) Oviposition Habitat Selection and Larval Hostplant Use in Washington State
    TAYLOR'S CHECKERSPOT (EUPHYDRYAS EDITHA TAYLORI) OVIPOSITION HABITAT SELECTION AND LARVAL HOSTPLANT USE IN WASHINGTON STATE By Daniel Nelson Grosboll A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Environmental Studies The Evergreen State College June 2011 © 2011 by Daniel Nelson Grosboll. All rights reserved. This Thesis for the Master of Environmental Study Degree by Daniel Nelson Grosboll has been approved for The Evergreen State College by ________________________ Judy Cushing, Ph.D. Member of the Faculty ______________ Date Abstract Taylor's checkerspot (Euphydryas editha taylori) oviposition habitat selection and larval hostplant use in Washington State Taylor’s checkerspot (Euphydryas editha taylori (W.H. Edwards 1888)), a Federal Endangered Species Act candidate species, is found in remnant colonies between extreme southwestern British Columbia and the southern Willamette Valley in Oregon. This butterfly and its habitat have declined precipitously largely due to anthropogenic impacts. However, this butterfly appears to benefit from some land management activities and some populations are dependent on an exotic hostplant. Oviposition sites determine what resources are available for larvae after they hatch. Larval survival and growth on three reported hostplants (Castilleja hispida, Plantago lanceolata, and P. major) were measured in captivity to determine the suitability of hostplant species and to develop captive rearing methods. Larvae successfully developed on C. hispida and P. lanceolata. Parameters of oviposition sites were measured within occupied habitat at four sites in Western Washington. Sampling occurred at two spatial scales with either complete site censuses or stratified systematic sampling on larger sites. Within the sampled or censused areas, oviposition sites were randomly selected for paired oviposition/adjacent non-oviposition microhabitat measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • Species: Cytisus Scoparius, C. Striatus
    Species: Cytisus scoparius, C. striatus http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/cytspp/all.html SPECIES: Cytisus scoparius, C. striatus Table of Contents Introductory Distribution and occurrence Botanical and ecological characteristics Fire ecology Fire effects Management considerations References INTRODUCTORY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION SYNONYMS NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY LIFE FORM FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS OTHER STATUS Scotch broom Portuguese broom © Br. Alfred Brousseau, Saint Mary's © 2005 Michael L. Charters, Sierra Madre, College CA. AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Zouhar, Kris. 2005. Cytisus scoparius, C. striatus. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2007, September 24]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: CYTSCO CYTSTR CYTSPP 1 of 54 9/24/2007 4:15 PM Species: Cytisus scoparius, C. striatus http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/shrub/cytspp/all.html SYNONYMS: None NRCS PLANT CODE [141]: CYSC4 CYST7 COMMON NAMES: Scotch broom Portuguese broom English broom scotchbroom striated broom TAXONOMY: The scientific name for Scotch broom is Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link [48,55,57,63,105,112,126,132,147,154,160] and for Portuguese broom is C. striatus (Hill) Rothm. [55,63,132]. Both are in the pea family (Fabaceae). In North America, there are 2 varieties of Scotch broom, distinguished by their flower color: C. scoparius var. scoparius and C. scoparius var. andreanus (Puiss.) Dipp. The former is the more widely distributed variety, and the latter occurs only in California [63]. This review does not distinguish between these varieties.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Golden Paintbrush in British Columbia
    Status of the Golden Paintbrush in British Columbia by Michael Ryan and George W. Douglas Wildlife Bulletin No. B-91 March 1999 British Columbia, Canada’s most westerly province, has a bounty of biological diversity. British Columbia’s snowclad peaks, rain-drenched forests, arid grasslands, all sizes of rivers, lakes, and wetlands, and a long and rugged coast provide habitats for more species of living organisms than are found anywhere else in Canada. However, this very diversity means that there is much to be discovered about these organisms — their distribution, abundance, habitat requirements, and interrelationships with their environment. Increasing our knowledge of this biodiversity will help us with the complex task of sustainably managing our land and waters. In 1992, the Provincial Government initiated a co-operative biodiversity research program with funding from the Corporate Resource Inventory Initia- tive, the British Columbia Ministries of Forests (Research Branch), Environment, Lands, and Parks (Wildlife and Habitat Protection Branches), and Tourism and Culture (Royal B.C. Museum); and the Forest Resource Develop- ment Agreement (FRDA II). In 1996, funding from Forest Renewal BC (FRBC) was received for a biodiversity research extension proposal. One goal of the original research program, and more recently the FRBC extension project, is to extend information to scientists, resource managers, and the public through biodiversity publications. These publications are intended to increase awareness and understanding of biodiversity, promote the concepts and importance of conserving biodiversity, and communicate provincial government initiatives related to biodiversity. We hope that they will be used as tools for the conservation of British Columbia’s rich, living legacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Paintbrush (Castilleja Levisecta)
    Golden Paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta) 5-Year Review Summary and Evaluation September 26, 2007 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Lacey, Washington 98503 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Golden Paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION.......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Reviewers....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review ................................................................. 1 1.3 Background .................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS....................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment (DPS) policy......................... 2 2.2 Recovery Criteria.......................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status .................................................... 5 2.4 Synthesis....................................................................................................................... 12 3.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.1 Recommended Classification ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download 2Nd Grade Prairie Packet 2021
    Western Washington Prairies A prairie is a wonderful place. There is so much going on in a prairie. We call a place like this an ecosystem. An ecosystem is an area where living creatures such as plants and animals interact with non-living things like soil, water, temperature and air. A prairie ecosystem is made up of grasses, flowers, birds, mammals, and insects but not many trees. As you learn about what lives in a prairie, you can add to your own prairie on the next page. Draw your own prairie plants and animals. We started the picture with a coyote looking for gophers. It’s your prairie, so you decide what lives on it. Have fun and don’t forget to add yourself on the prairie! The contents of this packet are ©Wolf Haven International unless otherwise noted. ©Wolf Haven International Burrowing keeps animals safe from predators and weather. We can’t see burrows from above, so use your imagination to picture how much is going on below ground in a prairie. The drawing on this page is a compilation of a prairie by National Geographic and a coyote by Wolf Haven International. Plants of the Prairie There are a variety of plants that grow on a prairie - grasses, flowers, and shrubs - but not very many trees! All of these plants play an important role in the health of the prairie ecosystem. They produce many roots that not only help keep soil stable, but also add nutrients to the soil as old roots die and decompose. Prairie plants provide a good habitat and hiding place for a lot of wildlife, and even use the sun’s energy to make their own food.
    [Show full text]
  • W a Sh in G to N Na Tu Ra L H Er Itag E Pr Og Ra M
    PROGRAM HERITAGE NATURAL Climate Change and Connectivity Review of Site Designs for Established Natural Areas with Federally Listed Plant Species Prepared for WASHINGTON US Fish and Wildlife Service Region 1 Prepared by Jake Kleinknecht, David Wilderman, and Walter Fertig December 26, 2019 Natural Heritage Report 2019-06 Climate Change and Connectivity Review Of Site Designs for Established Natural Areas with Federally Listed Plant Species Award Number F16AF01135 Prepared for US Fish and Wildlife Service Western Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Region 1 Section 6 Funding Washington Natural Heritage Program Report Number: 2019-06 December 26, 2019 Prepared by: Jake Kleinknecht, David Wilderman, and Walter Fertig Washington Natural Heritage Program Washington Department of Natural Resources Olympia, Washington 98504-7014 ON THE COVER: Map of projected temperature increase in Washington State relative to the distribution of the federally . Endangered Wenatchee Mountains checkermallow (Sidalcea oregana var. calva). Inset photo of Wenatchee Mountains checkermallow by Walter Fertig. Table of Contents Page Tables …………………………………………………………………………………………… iv Figures ………………………………………………………………………………………….. iv Appendices ……………………………………………………………………………………… v Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Study Areas ……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Camas Meadows Natural Area Preserve ………………………………………………… 3 Dishman Hills Natural Resource Conservation Area …………………………………… 4 Lacamas Prairie Natural Area Preserve …………………………………………………. 5 Rocky Prairie Natural
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization
    Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization by Tyler Thomas Kelly B.Sc. (Wildlife Biology), University of Montana, 2014 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science © Tyler Thomas Kelly 2019 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY SPRING 2019 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Tyler Kelly Degree: Master of Science (Biological Sciences) Title: Plant-Pollinator Interactions of the Oak-Savanna: Evaluation of Community Structure and Dietary Specialization Examining Committee: Chair: John Reynolds Professor Elizabeth Elle Senior Supervisor Professor Jonathan Moore Supervisor Associate Professor David Green Internal Examiner Professor [ Date Defended/Approved: April 08, 2019 ii Abstract Pollination events are highly dynamic and adaptive interactions that may vary across spatial scales. Furthermore, the composition of species within a location can highly influence the interactions between trophic levels, which may impact community resilience to disturbances. Here, I evaluated the species composition and interactions of plants and pollinators across a latitudinal gradient, from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to the Willamette and Umpqua Valleys in Oregon and Washington, United States of America. I surveyed 16 oak-savanna communities within three ecoregions (the Strait of Georgia/ Puget Lowlands, the Willamette Valley, and the Klamath Mountains), documenting interactions and abundances of the plants and pollinators. I then conducted various multivariate and network analyses on these communities to understand the effects of space and species composition on community resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern
    Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern NatureServe Canada contributes to the conservation of Canada’s biodiversity by providing scientific data and expertise about species and ecosystems of conservation concern to support decision-making, research, and education. Citation: Cannings, S., M. Anions, R. Rainer, and B. Stein. 2005. Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern. NatureServe Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. © NatureServe Canada 2005 ISBN 0-9711053-4-0 Primary funding for the publication of this report was provided by the Suncor Energy Foundation. This report is also available in French. To request a copy, please contact NatureServe Canada. NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 613-759-1861 www.natureserve-canada.ca Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern by Sydney Cannings Marilyn F. E. Anions Rob Rainer Bruce A. Stein Sydney Cannings NatureServe Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Yukon Department of the Environment P.O. Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 867-667-3684 Marilyn F. E. Anions NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Note on Captions: For each species, captions state the range in Canada only, as well as the NatureServe global conservation status. 613-759-1942 Rob Rainer Front Cover Chelsea, Québec Left to right: Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Vulnerable (G3). 819-827-9082 British Columbia. / Photo by Jared Hobbs. Golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta). Critically imperiled (G1). British Bruce A. Stein, Ph.D. Columbia. / Photo by Leah Ramsay, British Columbia Conservation Data NatureServe Centre. 1101 Wilson Blvd., 15th Floor Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2009), 34(1): pp. 182–197 © Copyright 2009 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists Phylogenetic Classification of Subtribe Castillejinae (Orobanchaceae) David C. Tank, 1,3, 4 J. Mark Egger, 2 and Richard G. Olmstead 1,2 1 Department of Biology, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 2 Herbarium, Burke Museum of Natural History, University of Washington, Box 355325, Seattle, Washington 98195 U.S.A. 3 Present Address: Department of Forest Resources and Stillinger Herbarium, University of Idaho, PO Box 441133, Moscow, Idaho 83844-1133 U.S.A. 4 Author for Correspondence ( [email protected] ) Communicating Editor: Lena Struwe Abstract— Recent molecular systematic research has indicated the need for a revised circumscription of generic boundaries in subtribe Castillejinae (tribe Pedicularideae, Orobanchaceae). Based on a well-resolved and well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis, we present a for- mal reclassification of the major lineages comprising the Castillejinae. Prior to this treatment, subtribe Castillejinae included Castilleja (ca. 190 spp.), Cordylanthus (18 spp.), Orthocarpus (9 spp.), Triphysaria (5 spp.), and the monotypic genera Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus. In the clas- sification presented here, Orthocarpus and Triphysaria retain their current circumscriptions, Castilleja is expanded to include Clevelandia and Ophiocephalus , and Cordylanthus is split into three genera; a key to the genera as they are recognized here is provided. Two new combinations, Castilleja beldingii and Castilleja ophiocephala , are proposed within the expanded Castilleja . The concept of Cordylanthus is restricted to the 13 species formerly recognized as subg. Cordylanthus , while subg. Dicranostegia and subg. Hemistegia are elevated to genus level ( Dicranostegia and Chloropyron , respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Quercus Garryana Communities in the Puget Trough, Washington
    David R. Thysell and Andrew B. Carey,1 Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, 3625 93th Avenue S.W., Olympia, Washington 98512-9193 Quercus garryana Communities in the Puget Trough, Washington Abstract Among the legacies of the Vashon Glaciation are Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana), prairie, wetland, and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) communities arrayed in a mosaic in the Puget Sound Area (PSA). Much of this mosaic has been de- stroyed. The largest remaining portion is on Fort Lewis Military Reservation. We examined oak communities on Fort Lewis to assess encroachment by exotic plants and by Douglas-fir, to determine amounts of regeneration of oak and other tree species, and to compare oak community diversity with that of nearby Douglas-fir forests and glacial till prairies. For the 22 largest communities, we determined densities of trees, distributions of tree diameters and heights, amounts of regeneration for each tree species, evidence of exogenous disturbances, and covers of vascular understory species. For study sites, we calculated basal areas of tree species, richness and diversity of vascular plants, and percentages of species that were exotic. We constructed species accumulation curves for oak communities, Douglas-fir forests, and prairies. We performed Bray-Curtis and weighted averaging ordinations for 176 sampling plots from the 22 sites. Oak communities were typically more diverse than either Douglas-fir forests or prairies and were transitional in species composition between them. However, oak communities contained numerous exotics, particularly Scot’s broom (Cytisus scoparius) and colonial bentgrass (Agrostis capillaris). Most oak communities contained large-diameter Douglas-firs and other tree species and appeared to be transforming to conifer or conifer/mixed hardwood forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Natural Areas Plan
    Oregon Natural Areas Plan 2010 Natural Heritage Advisory Council to the State Land Board State Land Board Kate Brown Ted Kulongoski Ted Wheeler Secretary of State Governor State Treasurer Natural Heritage Advisory Council Voting Members Richard Brown Robert Chandler Stuart Garrett Charles Carter Alan Dickman Cathy Macdonald Ex-Officio Members Agriculture Director: Katy Coba, represented by Rebecca Currin Fish and Wildlife Director: Roy Elicker, represented by Holly Michaels Forestry Director: Marvin Brown, represented by Andrew Yost Higher Education Chancellor: George Pernsteiner, represented by Scott Heppell Parks and Recreation Director: Tim Wood, represented by Noel Bacheller State Lands Director: Louise Solliday, represented by Cyndi Wickham Transportation Director: Matt Garrett, represented by Bill Warncke This is the first Oregon Natural Areas Plan It is based on the Oregon Natural Heritage Plan, first published in 1981 and revised in 1988, 1993, 1998 and 2003 by the Natural Heritage Advisory Council and by the staff of the Oregon Biodiversity Information Center: Jimmy Kagan - Director/Ecologist Lindsey Koepke Wise – Data Manager Sue Vrilakas – Botanist and Data Manager Eleanor Gaines – Zoology Projects Manager John Christy – Wetlands Ecologist / Bryologist Chapters 4-7 from the 2009 Interagency Strategy for the Pacific Northwest Natural Areas Network, by Todd M. Wilson, Reid Schuller, Russ Holmes, Curt Pavola, Robert A. Fimbel, Cynthia N. McCain, John G. Gamon, Pene Speaks, Joan I. Seevers, Thomas E. DeMeo, and Steve Gibbons Cover Photograph: Starvation Creek, by Miles Hemstrom. State Ecoregion Maps by John Bauer, Chapter Ecoregional Maps by Melissa Whitman Cite this document as: Oregon Natural Heritage Advisory Council. 2010. Oregon Natural Areas Plan.
    [Show full text]