DOCSLIB.ORG

Disentangling Predictors of Coping with Interpersonal Betrayal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Disentangling Predictors of Coping with Interpersonal Betrayal Trust Heals, Commitment Hurts: Disentangling Predictors of Coping with Interpersonal Betrayal Josiah Cameron Krieg School of Psychology The University of Adelaide December 2019 Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ii Table of Contents List of Tables and Figures .................................................................................................................... vi Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. xi Declaration ........................................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. xiv Chapter 1: Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of Forgiveness Research ............................................................................................... 2 1.2 Interpersonal Trust ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Overview of trust research ...................................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Links between trust and forgiveness ....................................................................................... 6 1.3 Commitment ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.3.1 Overview of commitment research ....................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Links between commitment and forgiveness ........................................................................ 12 1.3.3 Does commitment increase distress? ................................................................................... 14 1.4 Other Outcome Variables ............................................................................................................ 16 1.4.1 Hurtfulness ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.4.2 Negative emotion .................................................................................................................. 17 1.4.3 Psychological tension ........................................................................................................... 17 1.4.4 Rumination ........................................................................................................................... 18 1.5 Why Study Trust and Commitment Together? ............................................................................. 19 1.6 Research Examining both Trust and Commitment in the Context of Forgiveness ....................... 21 1.7 Research Goals ........................................................................................................................... 25 iii Chapter 2: Study 1 ............................................................................................................................... 27 2.1 Method ......................................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.1 Participants ........................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.2 Procedure and measures ..................................................................................................... 28 2.2 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 40 2.2.1 Descriptive statistics ............................................................................................................. 40 2.2.2 Bivariate correlations ............................................................................................................ 42 2.2.3 Partial correlations ................................................................................................................ 42 2.2.4 Control analyses ................................................................................................................... 44 2.3 Study 1 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 49 Chapter 3: Theoretical Development ................................................................................................. 55 3.1 The Valuable Relationships Hypothesis....................................................................................... 55 3.2 Interdependence Theory .............................................................................................................. 58 3.3 The Mutual Cyclical Growth Model .............................................................................................. 59 3.4 The Risk Regulation Model .......................................................................................................... 61 3.5 Proposed Theoretical Explanation for Study 1 Findings .............................................................. 63 3.6 Explaining the Effects of Commitment ......................................................................................... 66 3.6.1 The indirect effect via relationship value ............................................................................... 66 3.7 Explaining the Effects of Trust ..................................................................................................... 67 3.7.1 The indirect effect via exploitation risk .................................................................................. 67 3.7.2 The indirect effect via attributions ......................................................................................... 67 3.8 Formal Statement of Hypotheses for Study 2 .............................................................................. 68 iv Chapter 4: Study 2 ............................................................................................................................... 69 4.1 Method ......................................................................................................................................... 69 4.1.1 Participants ........................................................................................................................... 69 4.1.2 Procedure and measures ..................................................................................................... 70 4.2 Results ......................................................................................................................................... 75 4.2.1 Descriptive statistics ............................................................................................................. 75 4.2.2 Bivariate correlations ............................................................................................................ 76 4.2.3 Partial correlations ................................................................................................................ 76 4.2.4 Mediation analyses ............................................................................................................... 78 4.2.5 Control analyses ................................................................................................................... 84 4.3 Study 2 Discussion ...................................................................................................................... 86 Chapter 5: Study 3 ............................................................................................................................... 92 5.1 Explaining the Effects of Commitment through Mutuality of Dependence .................................... 92 5.2 Formal Statement of Hypotheses for Study 3 .............................................................................. 94 5.3 Method ......................................................................................................................................... 95 5.3.1 Participants ........................................................................................................................... 95 5.3.2 T1 procedure and measures ................................................................................................. 96 5.3.3 T2 procedure and measures ................................................................................................. 97 5.4 Results ....................................................................................................................................... 101 5.4.1 Descriptive statistics ........................................................................................................... 101 5.4.2 Bivariate correlations .......................................................................................................... 101 5.4.3 Partial correlations .............................................................................................................. 104 v 5.4.4 Mediation analyses ............................................................................................................. 104 5.4.5 Control analyses ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pathologising Effect of TV Revengendas
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2015 The bitter taste of payback: the pathologising effect of TV revengendas Cassandra E. Sharp University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sharp, Cassandra E., "The bitter taste of payback: the pathologising effect of TV revengendas" (2015). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 2422. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/2422 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] The bitter taste of payback: the pathologising effect of TV revengendas Abstract The thirst for vengeance is a timeless subject in popular entertainment. One need only think of Old Testament scripture; Shakespeare's Hamlet; Quentin Tarantino's Kill Bill or the TV series Revenge, and we immediately conjure up images of a protagonist striving to seek justice to avenge a heinous wrong committed against them. These texts, and others like it, speak to that which is ingrained in our human spirit about not only holding others responsible for their actions, but also about retaliation as payback. This article seeks to problematise the way the popular revenge narrative effectively constructs the vendetta as a guilty pleasure through which the audience can vicariously gain satisfaction, while at the same time perpetuates law's rhetoric that personal desires for vengeance are to be repressed and denied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Understandings of Revenge Through Discussions with University Students
    The understandings of revenge through discussions with University students Elise McKenna Honours Thesis in Legal Studies Murdoch University, 2016 Declaration: “I declare this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution” (Elise May McKenna) Abstract: The goal of this study was to examine how revenge is understood by a sample of university students using a grounded theory approach. Desires and acts of revenge were found to be more prevalent in interpersonal relationships than stranger to stranger. Revenge was also shown to be a behaviour made through a costs benefit analysis to the victim rather than an act of irrationality. In addition to this, the understanding and concepts of revenge by the students were at times to be influenced by how the media had portrayed it to them. Lastly, it was shown that acts of revenge were used in all different groups of victims and types of harms through indirect and direct behaviours. Acknowledgments: This research was initially supported by Dr Courtney Field and I would like to thank him for initiating my interest in the topic of revenge and providing me with his insight. I would also, however, like to express my sincere gratitude to my Supervisor- Associate Professor Guy Hall. Supervision for this thesis has been complicated and when I needed someone to step in he did not hesitate to take on this role. I am very grateful for the time, effort and encouragement Guy has provided me over this year and previous years.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal in the Life of Edward De Vere & the Works of Shakespeare
    Brief Chronicles V (2014) 47 Betrayal in the Life of Edward de Vere & the Works of Shakespeare Richard M. Waugaman* “The reasoned criticism of a prevailing belief is a service to the proponents of that belief; if they are incapable of defending it, they are well advised to abandon it. Any substantive objection is permissible and encouraged; the only exception being that ad hominem attacks on the personality or motives of the author are excluded.” — Carl Sagan e have betrayed Shakespeare. We have failed to recognize his true identity. Any discussion of the theme of betrayal in his works must Wbegin here. We psychoanalysts have also betrayed Freud, in “analyzing” rather than evaluating objectively Freud’s passionately held belief during his final years that “William Shakespeare” was the pseudonym of the Elizabethan courtier poet and playwright Edward de Vere, Earl of Oxford (1550-1604).1 Freud realized that one unconscious motive for our betrayal of Shakespeare2 is our implacable wish to idealize him. That is, we prefer to accept the traditional author not just in spite of how little we know about him, but precisely because we know so little about him. Thus, we can more easily imagine that this shadowy inkblot of a figure was as glorious a person as are his literary creations. The real Shakespeare was a highly flawed human being who knew betrayal first-hand, since his childhood, from both sides, both as betrayer and betrayed. * This article was originally published in Betrayal: Developmental, Literary, and Clinical Realms, edited by Salman Akhtar (published by Karnac Books in 2013), and is reprinted with kind per- mission of Karnac Books.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal, Rejection, Revenge, and Forgiveness: an Interpersonal Script Approach
    Betrayal, Rejection, Revenge, and Forgiveness: An Interpersonal Script Approach Julie Fitness Macquarie University Email: [email protected] In: Leary, M. (Ed.) (2001) Interpersonal rejection (pp. 73-103). New York: Oxford University Press. Acknowledgement: The author acknowledges the support of a Large ARC grant A79601552 in the writing of this chapter. 2 Introduction Throughout recorded human history, treachery and betrayal have been considered amongst the very worst offences people could commit against their kith and kin. Dante, for example, relegated traitors to the lowest and coldest regions of Hell, to be forever frozen up to their necks in a lake of ice with blizzards storming all about them, as punishment for having acted so coldly toward others. Even today, the crime of treason merits the most severe penalties, including capital punishment. However, betrayals need not involve issues of national security to be regarded as serious. From sexual infidelity to disclosing a friend’s secrets, betraying another person or group of people implies unspeakable disloyalty, a breach of trust, and a violation of what is good and proper. Moreover, all of us will suffer both minor and major betrayals throughout our lives, and most of us will, if only unwittingly, betray others (Jones & Burdette, 1994). The Macquarie Dictionary (1991) lists a number of different, though closely related, meanings of the term “to betray,” including to deliver up to an enemy, to be disloyal or unfaithful, to deceive or mislead, to reveal secrets, to seduce and desert, and to disappoint the hopes or expectations of another. Implicit in a number of these definitions is the rejection or discounting of one person by another; however, the nature of the relationship between interpersonal betrayal and rejection has not been explicitly addressed in the social psychological literature.
    [Show full text]
  • A Moment of Betrayal
    Dr. Jeff Roberts Follow on Twitter @Jeff_Roberts March 15, 2015 of a betrayal as Judas’ kiss. Peter’s three-time denial of When was the time when you and I first discovered that being a friend and follower of Jesus is also a moment we too betray? of betrayal. There are no soldiers, no arrests, no others The Way of the Cross around but there is still a turning and betrayal. Peter It is true betrayal may be the most hurtful moment knew it so he walked away weeping and in shame. we experience, but when we experience it we must A Moment of Betrayal TRINITY BAPTIST CHURCH remember… we betray… sometimes with a kiss, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA It would be after the Resurrection that Jesus would sometimes with a broken promise, sometimes when a Mark 14:43-52, 66-72 forgive and restore Peter. Who knows what would curse, sometimes with a turn and walk away… but we have happened had Judas not gone to self-destruction? betray. When we have been the one who betrayed, then Trini we have worked with for years and confided in uses that information to belittle us and in turn But this we know. In the other story of betrayal Jesus surely we are thankful for forgiveness. Surely, then we t Tu Brute? Those are famous words forgives. Jesus restores the relationship. might find it within us with God’s help the one who E propel him or herself forward. of betrayal uttered by Julius Caesar knows betrayal to learn to forgive. as his friend Brutus joins the others in his own It can happen in the church.
    [Show full text]
  • “Messengers of Justice and of Wrath”: the Captivity
    ―Messengers of Justice and of Wrath‖: The Captivity-Revenge Cycle in the American Frontier Romance A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Brian P. Elliott June 2011 © 2011 Brian P. Elliott. All Rights Reserved. 2 This dissertation titled ―Messengers of Justice and of Wrath‖: The Captivity-Revenge Cycle in the American Frontier Romance by BRIAN P. ELLIOTT has been approved for the Department of English and the College of Arts and Sciences by Paul C. Jones Associate Professor of English Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 ABSTRACT ELLIOTT, BRIAN P., Ph.D., June 2011, English ―Messengers of Justice and of Wrath‖: The Captivity-Revenge Cycle in the American Frontier Romance Director of Dissertation: Paul C. Jones This project explores the central importance of captivity and revenge to four novels in the genre of frontier romance: Charles Brockden Brown‘s Edgar Huntly (1799), James Fenimore Cooper‘s Last of the Mohicans (1826), Catharine Maria Sedgwick‘s Hope Leslie (1827), and Robert Montgomery Bird‘s Nick of the Woods (1837). Although a fundamental plot aspect of nearly every work in the genre, the threat of captivity and the necessity of revenge are rarely approached as topics of inquiry, despite their deep connection to the structure and action of the texts. Perhaps most importantly, as critics Jeremy Engels and Greg Goodale note, these twin tropes serve as a way of unifying disparate social groups and creating order; in essence, such depictions function as a form of what Michel Foucault terms ―governmentality,‖ logics of control that originate from non-governmental sources but promote systems of governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Medea & Phaedra
    Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge Theater of War creator Bryan Doerries returns to BAM to lead discussion surrounding mental health through readings from Euripides’ Medea and Seneca’s Phaedra Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge Led by Bryan Doerries With Elizabeth Marvel, Amy Ryan, Donnetta Lavinia Grays, and Bill Camp Mon, Jun 20 at 7pm BAM Fisher (Fishman Space), 321 Ashland Pl Free with RSVP Brooklyn, NY/May 19, 2016—BAM Humanities presents Medea & Phaedra: Tragedies of Passion, Betrayal, and Revenge—an evening of performance and dialogue featuring dramatic readings of scenes from Euripides’ Medea and Seneca’s Phaedra, followed by discussion about the relevance of these myths to contemporary society. The evening will be led by Theater of War founder Bryan Doerries, using his translation of Medea and a translation of Phaedra by Laura Weber, with performances by Elizabeth Marvel, Amy Ryan, Donnetta Lavinia Grays, and Bill Camp. Medea and Phaedra—both of which timelessly explore how scorned passion can lead to revenge and unthinkable violence—will serve as the gateway to a discussion surrounding mental illness. These plays pose the question as to whether the irreversible actions of the titular characters are driven by mental illness. From there, Doerries will facilitate a conversation that will address under-discussed mental health issues—such as post-partum depression and psychosis—and will extend to recent incidents that seem uncannily similar to the plots of these ancient plays. For press information contact Christina Norris at [email protected] or 718.636.4129 x8. About the artists Writer, director, and translator Bryan Doerries is the founder of Theater of War, a project that presents readings of ancient Greek plays to military and civilian communities to initiate conversations about the wounds of war.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Stress Disorder & Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
    Promoting recovery after trauma Australian Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Stress Disorder & Posttraumatic Stress Disorder © Phoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, 2013 ISBN Print: 978-0-9752246-0-1 ISBN Online: 978-0-9752246-1-8 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Phoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Phoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health ([email protected]). Copies of the full guidelines, and brief guides for practitioners and the public are available online: www.phoenixaustralia.org www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au The suggested citation for this document is: Phoenix Australia - Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health. Australian Guidelines for the Treatment of Acute Stress Disorder and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Phoenix Australia, Melbourne, Victoria. Legal disclaimer This document is a general guide to appropriate practice, to be followed only subject to the practitioner’s judgement in each individual case. The guidelines are designed to provide information to assist decision making and are based on the best information available at the date of publication. In recognition of the pace of advances in the field, it is recommended that the guidelines be reviewed and updated in five years’ time. Publication Approval These guidelines were approved by the Chief Executive Officer of the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) on 4 July 2013, under Section 14A of the National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Basak Dissertation
    Representing Censored Pasts: State-Violence in Twentieth Century Turkish and Spanish Literature by Başak Çandar A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Comparative Literature) in the University of Michigan 2014 Doctoral Committee: Professor Kader Konuk, Co-Chair, Universität Duisburg-Essen Professor Cristina Moreiras-Menor, Co-Chair Associate Professor Gottfried J. Hagen Professor Anton Shammas ii To the extraordinary memory of my grandmother, Saffet “Safko” Çandar, who taught me my words. iii Acknowledgements This dissertation began in earnest in 2007 in Barcelona, after one of the most spectacular summers of my life. We had assumed that it would take much shorter and that it would end in Turkey. We were amiss, but I would still like to begin by thanking the memory of that uphill walk, which began this journey. Throughout the past six years, my committee has been an invaluable source of support and wisdom and I thank them for all their help and kindness. Kader was the reason I came to the University of Michigan, and her brilliant scholarship, her ability to alert me to the most unexpected connections and her friendship have helped me immensely and meant more to me than I can describe here. Despite her busy schedule as the Chair of the Romance Languages Department, Cristina has taken the time to comment on my work and listen to my ideas. I cannot thank her enough for her encouragement and support, without which I would have never ventured into Spanish literature. The classes I have taken with Gottfried and our conversations have been incredibly informative for me.
    [Show full text]
  • FORESHADOWING by Colin Maclean
    FORESHADOWING By Colin MacLean The Tempest is one of the most magical of Shakespeare’s plays. And his last major work. There is spectacle, allegory, betrayal, revenge, and the importance of family. It’s a fable of art and creation and many purport to see in Prospero, the aging necromancer at the center of the play, the figure of Shakespeare himself. In the bittersweet ending, Prospero renounces his magic. Is he perhaps the Bard saying goodbye to his art and, short years later, his life? Since it was penned in 1610, it has proven to be surprisingly elastic. It has been subject to all sorts of interpretations (Is Caliban really the result of years of the white man’s colonial conquest of Africa?). It’s been an opera, a ballet, featured in paintings and a lot of movies (Forbidden Planet/Disney’s Pocahontas). But few promise quite as much as the Citadel’s final production of the season, coming up in April. First, let’s meet Josette Bushell-Mingo. She is a London-born, Swedish-based, actress, playwright, and director of African Descent. She has played in Peer Gynt and Antony and Cleopatra. In 2000, she was nominated for a Lawrence Olivier Award for her role as Rafiki in The Lion King. The Queen presented her with an OBE. Having lived in Sweden for many years, she is the former Artistic Director for The Swedish National Deaf Theatre, Tyst Teater (Silent Theatre). Mutual theatrical interests brought her in contact with Daryl Cloran, the Citadel’s current Artistic Director. “Daryl is particularly interested in inclusive work – in new forms of communication, great theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenge and the Rule of Law in Nineteenth-Century American Literature
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Exceptional Vengeance: Revenge and the Rule of Law in Nineteenth-Century American Literature A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Literature by Lisa M. Thomas Committee in charge: Professor Nicole Tonkovich, Chair Professor John Blanco Professor Michael Davidson Professor Rachel Klein Professor Shelley Streeby 2012 Copyright Lisa M. Thomas, 2012 All rights reserved. The Dissertation of Lisa M. Thomas is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Chair University of California, San Diego 2012 iii DEDICATION To my family, friends, and committee for their endless encouragement, support, and patience. Whatever happens next, thanks for coming along (and putting up) with me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page…………………………………………………………………........ iii Dedication…………………………………………………………………………. iv Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….. v Acknowledgments ………………………………………………………………… vi Vita ………………………………………………………………………………… vii Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………. viii Introduction: Revenge, Justice, and Exceptionalist Rhetoric in the Nineteenth-Century United States………………………………………….. 1 Chapter 1: Reluctant Warriors: Community and Conflict in William Gilmore Simms’s The Yemassee ……………………………………………………… 51 Chapter 2: Unlikely Killers: Justifying Violence against Native Americans through Hannah Duston’s Captivity and Nick of the Woods ……………….. 125 Chapter 3: Revenge and Regret on the Texas
    [Show full text]
  • Literature's Loyalty to Betrayal
    AIC nr. 21 1/2018 Literature’s Loyalty to Betrayal ©2018 AIC DRAGOŞ AVĂDANEI Universitatea „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iaşi This idiosyncratically titled paper is motivated by an attempt to answer the unexpectedly difficult question about betrayal as a fun- Keywords damental theme or motif in literature—literature in general, from the first known such work, Gilgamesh, through Greek and Roman betrayal; identity; mythology, fairy tales and folk tales, medieval romances, Dante, communication; Cervantes and Shakespeare, to Goethe, Tolstoy and Joyce, to evil; conflict; Anne Sexton and Philip Levine. Our tentative answers: betrayal cognitive may represent the fundamental human conflict, as it undermines dissonance. two of man’s essential claims to existence—identity and commu- nication; evil is more powerful than good; betrayal is a prominent form of cognitive dissonance; and all of these are “illustrated” in five betrayal poems by William Stafford, Anthony Hecht, Frank O’Hara, Anne Sexton, and Philip Levine. Betrayal seeps through literature like a dark stain… (Karin Altenberg) Altenberg’s statement is chosen as an epigraph here both because of its relevance to the topic and because “seeps” and “dark stain” are not—as our text will most likely prove—quite appro- priate. That betrayal and/or treason is part of the human condition can be sustained with another quote: “Throughout recorded human history, treachery and betrayal have been considered among the very worst offences people could commit against their kith and kin” (Julie Fitness); while the “dark stain” part may be argued for through the authority of Malcolm X/Little (Alex Haley— “the thing that is worse than death is betrayal… I could conceive of death, but I could not con- ceive of betrayal”).
    [Show full text]