DOCSLIB.ORG

CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report January 2014 Prepared for the CONNECT Our Future project by: ASAP (Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project) Asheville, NC www.asapconnections.org CEFS (Center for Environmental Farming Systems) CFSA (Carolina Farm Stewardship Association) Raleigh, NC Pittsboro, NC www.cefs.ncsu.edu www.carolinafarmstewards.org Cite this report: Local Food Research Center (2014). CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report. Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project, Asheville, North Carolina. A report funded by the CONNECT Our Future Project. CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 CONNECT Our Future Project ..................................................................................................1 Key Findings ............................................................................................................................1 Summary of Recommendations...............................................................................................3 SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT REGION ...........................................................................3 The Project Region ..................................................................................................................3 Geographic Location................................................................................................................4 Major Economic Drivers ..........................................................................................................4 Demographics .........................................................................................................................5 Health of the Population .........................................................................................................6 SECTION 2: REGIONAL LOCAL FOOD SUPPLY ...............................................................................8 Production Data ......................................................................................................................8 Local Food Infrastructure Inventory ......................................................................................20 Equity and Access ..................................................................................................................22 Food Waste Management .....................................................................................................30 SECTION 3: REGIONAL LOCAL FOOD DEMAND ..........................................................................41 Resident Food Consumption and Spending ...........................................................................43 Food Dollar Considerations ...................................................................................................45 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................................47 Bring Food System Issues to the Forefront of Local Government ...........................................47 Support Farmers and Local Food Production .........................................................................48 Connect Residents to Their Food System ...............................................................................49 Address Equity and Access in the Food System ......................................................................51 Expand the Knowledge Base Around Your Community Food System .....................................52 Develop an Intentional Network to Foster Communication and Collaboration ......................54 APPENDIX A: INVENTORY OF FOOD SYSTEMS ASSESSMENTS IN PROJECT REGION ....................55 CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report North Carolina .......................................................................................................................55 South Carolina .......................................................................................................................68 Federal ..................................................................................................................................70 APPENDIX B: LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN REGION .................................................71 Sector Analysis ......................................................................................................................71 Key Recommendations ..........................................................................................................73 APPENDIX C: COUNTY SNAPSHOTS ............................................................................................83 APPENDIX D: COUNTY SNAPSHOT METHODOLOGY ...................................................................98 Production ............................................................................................................................98 Retail Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 101 Consumption, Access, and Health........................................................................................ 103 Waste Management ............................................................................................................ 105 Equity .................................................................................................................................. 106 APPENDIX E: 2013 REGIONAL FOOD SYSTEM STAKEHOLDER SURVEY DATA ............................ 107 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................. 107 Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................... 109 Survey Results ..................................................................................................................... 113 APPENDIX F: COMMUNITY RESOURCES INVESTED IN THE REGIONAL FOOD SYSTEM ............... 156 Purpose and Goals .............................................................................................................. 156 Approach ............................................................................................................................ 157 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 160 Results ................................................................................................................................ 166 CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report List of Tables and Figures Tables: TABLE 1. DIET-RELATED ILLNESS IN CONNECT OUR FUTURE PROJECT REGION ............................6 TABLE 2. FARMS AND ACRES OF FARMLAND, 2002 AND 2007 .....................................................8 TABLE 3. FARMS BY VALUE OF SALES, 2002 AND 2007 ................................................................9 TABLE 4. DOLLAR SHARE OF RETAIL PRODUCE SALES FOR SELECTED PRODUCE, 2012 ...............17 TABLE 5. PRODUCTION OF SELECTED FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, 2007 ............................18 TABLE 6. PRODUCTION OF SELECTED ANIMAL PRODUCTS, 2007 ...............................................19 TABLE 7. ENTITIES MAPPED ON LOCAL FOOD INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY MAP, 2013 ..........22 TABLE 8. SELECTED PANTRIES, FOOD BANKS, AND COMMUNITY GARDENS IN THE REGION BY COUNTY ....................................................................................................................................26 TABLE 9. ESTIMATED RESIDENT CONSUMPTION AND SPENDING, AND ESTIMATED FARM PRODUCTION OF SELECTED FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES IN THE PROJECT REGION ............44 Figures: FIGURE 1. CONNECT OUR FUTURE PROJECT REGION ...................................................................3 FIGURE 2. FARMS BY VALUE OF SALES, 2002 AND 2007 ............................................................10 FIGURE 3. FARMS BY NORTH AMERICAN INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM, 2007 .................11 FIGURE 4. NET CASH FARM INCOME: AVERAGE NET EARNINGS AND LOSSES, 2007 ..................13 FIGURE 5. NET CASH FARM INCOME: FARMS REPORTING NET GAINS AND NET LOSSES, 2007 ..14 FIGURE 6. LOCAL FOOD INFRASTRUCTURE INVENTORY MAP FOR PROJECT REGION, 2013 ........20 FIGURE 7. FOOD DESERTS WITHIN THE PROJECT REGION, 2013 ................................................24 FIGURE 8. CHANGE IN DIRECT SALES FROM 2002-2007 .............................................................42 CONNECT Our Future: Food Systems Assessment Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This report was produced by ASAP (Appalachian Sustainable Agriculture Project) with CEFS (Center for Environmental Farming Systems) and CFSA (Carolina Farm Stewardship Association) to inform the food systems development work of the CONNECT Our Future project in Charlotte, North Carolina, and 14 surrounding counties: Anson, Cabarrus, Cleveland, Gaston, Iredell, Lincoln, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Stanly, and Union counties in North Carolina, and Chester, Lancaster, Union, and York counties in South Carolina. (These counties will be referred to throughout this report as the “CONNECT Our Future project region” or “project region.”) This report documents current food and farm conditions,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 7-Eleven (S&P: Aa-) New 15 Year Lease
    INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 7-ELEVEN (S&P: AA-) NEW 15 YEAR LEASE NEWBERRY, SC OFFERED AT: $5,670,000 | 4.85% CAP OFFERED AT $2,027,000 | 6% CAP Representative Photo EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROPERTY INFORMATION TENANT OVERVIEW AREA OVERVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Offering Summary 5 Investment Highlights 6 Lease Summary & Rent Schedule 7 Lease Abstract PROPERTY INFORMATION 9 Location Maps 10 Site Plan 11 Property Elevations 12 Neighboring Tenants 15 Aerials TENANT OVERVIEW 22 About 7-Eleven AREA OVERVIEW Representative Photo 25 Newberry Area Overview 26 Overview: Upstate SC 27 Demographics Confidentiality Agreement & Disclosures EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY RYAN BARR RYAN BENNETT Principal Principal 760.448.2446 760.448.2449 [email protected] [email protected] LOCAL MARKET EXPERT ANDREW HARRILL Lee & Associates-Greenville Actual Property Representative Photo BROKER OF RECORD: Lee & Associates Greenville, LLC | SC Brokers Lic# 13082 7-ELEVEN | Newberry, SC | 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7-ELEVEN Newberry, SC 7-ELEVEN | Newberry, SC | 3 Representative Photo EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROPERTY INFORMATION TENANT OVERVIEW AREA OVERVIEW • Offering Summary • Investment Highlights Lease Summary & Rent Schedule Lease Abstract -- OFFERING SUMMARY -- INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS PROPERTY OVERVIEW Offering Price: $5,670,000 Address: West Dr & Hwy 219 Newberry, SC 29108 Net Operating Income: $275,000 * Property Size: 4,050 Sq. Ft. Cap Rate: 4.85% Land Size: 2 Acres Tenant Credit: S&P: AA- Ownership: Fee Simple *Subject to change Year Built: 2020 Lee & Associates is pleased to exclusively offer for sale the fee simple interest (land & building) in a retail property located in the city of Newberry, SC (the “Property”). The Property consists of a new 4,050-square-foot retail building currently under construction that sits on an approximately 2-acre parcel.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use Planning, Policy, and Water Quality Nexus
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2018 Land Use Planning, Policy, and Water Quality Nexus for Escherichia coli Mitigation: A Case Study of Greenville, SC Katherine D'Anna Bernier Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Bernier, Katherine D'Anna, "Land Use Planning, Policy, and Water Quality Nexus for Escherichia coli Mitigation: A Case Study of Greenville, SC" (2018). All Theses. 2816. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2816 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAND USE PLANNING, POLICY, AND WATER QUALITY NEXUS FOR Escherichia coli MITIGATION: A CASE STUDY OF GREENVILLE, SC A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of City and Regional Planning by Katherine D’Anna Bernier May 2018 Accepted by: Caitlin S. Dyckman J.D., Ph.D., Committee Chair Cindy M. Lee, Ph.D., Chris S. McMahan, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Pathogenic impairments are widespread across the United States and the source of the pollutant is both complicated and often elusive. The boundary of Greenville County, South Carolina crosses four Hydrologic Unit Code 8 watershed designations, and within those, there are over one hundred approved Total Maximum Daily Loads related to fecal indicator bacteria. This region is experiencing rapid growth and development; consequently, it is critical for planners to better understand the nexus between land use choices and water quality impacts, as zoning, ordinance decisions, and comprehensive plans can affect this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Factbook a SUMMARY of CONDITIONS and TRENDS for UPSTATE, SOUTH CAROLINA
    Regional FactBook A SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS AND TRENDS FOR UPSTATE, SOUTH CAROLINA In support of the Connecting Our Future Regional Transportation, Mobility, and Connectivity Initiative for the Ten County Upstate Region. February 2018 Version 1.2 This Regional Fact Book provides part of the Connecting Our Future and led by a coalition of Upstate background information to assist Initiative. Data has been assembled stakeholders representing education, with the development of the Regional from the region’s previous plans, transit systems, local governments, Transportation, Mobility and studies, and existing sources unless economic development Connectivity Vision and Actionable otherwise noted. This effort is organizations, healthcare, Strategies being developed as being coordinated by Ten at the Top conservation groups and business. For questions please contact: Dean Hybl, Executive Director 124 Verdae Boulevard, Suite 202 Ten at the Top Greenville, South Carolina [email protected] tenatthetop.org (864) 283-2315 Advisory Committee Members Adam Artigliere McNair Law Firm Joanie Martin Michelin Fred Cartwright PRUV Mobility Max Metcalf BMW Manufacturing Dan Cooper TriCounty Technical College Stacey Mills USC Upstate Andrea Cooper Upstate Forever Janice Moss Redi-Group Mike Davidson JTEKT Ric Ransom Greenville Health System Suzanne Dickerson SC Council on Competitiveness Sue Schneider Spartanburg Water Joe Dill Greenville County Council Gary Shepard Greenlink DJ Doherty Mavin Construction Carter Smith Spartanburg Economic Futures Group Dave
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Multi-Decadal Trends in Streamflow and Design Floods in the Southeastern United States
    Characterizing Multi-Decadal Trends in Streamflow and Design Floods in the Southeastern United States By Sarah Brannum Senior Honors Thesis Department of Geological Sciences University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill April 29, 2021 Approved: ____________________________ Dr. Antonia Sebastian, Thesis Advisor Characterizing Multi-decadal Trends in Streamflow and Design Floods in the Southeastern United States Sarah Brannum Abstract Design floods serve an important role in environmental planning and management; however, flood frequency analyses often assume that historical records are stationary despite anthropogenic changes across the watershed. Such changes are especially prevalent in the southeastern United States where rapid population growth coupled with climate change is dramatically altering catchment response. To understand how design floods have changed over time, this study investigates historical records of daily river discharge at over 5,800 USGS gauges in the Southeastern USA. When looking at trends in daily discharges, we find that 40% experienced a significant (p<0.05) increase in daily discharge, 50% experienced significant decrease, and 10% experienced no significant change in daily discharge. We observe that, in general, gages exhibiting increasing daily discharge are spatially concentrated east of the Appalachian Mountains and gages exhibiting decreasing daily discharge are spatially concentrated to the west. When looking at trends in extreme discharges using both the annual maxima and a peak-over-threshold with discharges above the 90th and 99th percentiles, we find that less than 20% of gages had a significant trend in the extreme discharges. We then conducted a flood frequency analysis at gages with the most significant (positive and negative) trends in daily discharge to estimate the 25- 50- and 100-year design flows using the Gumbel distribution based.
    [Show full text]
  • I-85 Futures
    NORTH CAROLINA INFRA GRANT APPLICATION | MARCH 2021 I-85 FUTURES FUnding Transportation Utilizing Resilient Equitable Solutions 2021 INFRA GRANT PROPOSAL I-85: FUnding Transportation Utilizing Resilient, Equitable Solutions (I-85 FUTURES) BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION I-85: FUnding Transportation Utilizing What is the Project Name? Resilient, Equitable, Solutions (I-85 FUTURES) Who is the Project Sponsor? North Carolina Department of Transportation Brian Burch, PE Was an INFRA application for this project submitted previously? (If Yes, please include No title) PROJECT COSTS INFRA Request Amount $76,289,000 Estimated Federal funding (excl. INFRA), anticipated to be used in INFRA funded future $0 project Estimated non-Federal funding anticipated to be $325,235,700 used in INFRA funded future project. Future Eligible Project Cost (Sum of previous $401,524,700 three rows) Previously incurred project costs (if applicable) $9,444,766 Total Project Cost (Sum of ‘previous incurred’ $410,969,466 and ‘future eligible’) Are matching funds restricted to a specific No project component? If so, which one? PROJECT ELIGIBILITY Approximately how much of the estimated Based on current design, approximately future eligible project costs will be spent on $381,448,465 will be spent on components of components of the project currently located on the project on the NHFN (YOE 2024). National Highway Freight Network (NHFN)? Approximately how much of the estimated Based on current design, approximately future eligible project costs will be spent on $381,448,465 will be spent on components of components of the project currently located on the project on the NHS (YOE 2024). the National Highway System (NHS)? Approximately how much of the estimated Based on current design, anticipated future future eligible project costs will be spent on eligible project costs for four railroad bridges components constituting railway-highway are $37.5 million (YOE 2024).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy in the Carolinas
    POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE CAROLINAS n the last fifty years, the two Carolinas have experienced significant gains in population and NARROWING THE I economic well-being that have partly closed the INCOME GAP gap between their income and that of the nation. In BETWEEN THE 1960 South Carolina’s population stood at 2,392,000, ranking it twenty-sixth among the fifty states. North CAROLINAS AND Carolina’s population then was 4,573,000, placing THE NATION BY it as the twelfth most populous state. In 2018 South Carolina’s population was 5,084,000, or twenty-third GETTING THE in size. North Carolina’s population was 10,383,000, BRAINS IN THE making it the nation’s ninth most populous state. RIGHT PLACES Meanwhile, from 1958 to 2018, per capita personal income expressed as a percentage of the US average Bruce Yandle rose in both states until 1995 and then plateaued Dean Emeritus and fell slightly. Because the cost of living in the Clemson University two Carolinas is lower than that for the nation, the gap between each of the Carolinas and the nation is systematically smaller than the percentage indicates. Close examination of the development strategies followed by policy makers in the two states reveals meaningful differences. North Carolina focused on strengthening higher education and the Research Triangle and on building a knowledge-based economy. South Carolina, in contrast, emphasized expanded technical education, greater utilization of its Charleston port, and specialization in advanced manufacturing. In both cases, state leaders focused on human capital, or brains, and on how to attract and keep a more highly educated workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Downtown Greenville, Sc
    PROFILE SERIES O 44 DOWNTOWN RISING O 52 THE KEYS O 54 FOCAL POINT This isn’t your average downtown. This isn’t a block or two of renovated ware- O 56 PUTTING THE GREEN IN GREENVILLE houses, pricey bistros, and contemporary art galleries. What Greenville, O 64 BEST OF South Carolina, has done to its downtown makes other cities green with envy O 70 HISTORY — think inventive restaurants, locally owned boutiques, a stellar arts scene, and a 30-acre park with pedestrian bridge and waterfall. (And that’s barely skimming the surface.) Located just two hours from Atlanta and Charlotte, this is one cool city, with forward-thinking leaders and a clear-cut plan that has transformed downtown into the destination it is today. KEYS TO THE CITY OF O O O JOSH JONES BY PHOTO DOWNTOWN SC Greenville • 42 • • 43 • KEYS TO THE CITY OF DOWNTOWN GREENVILLE, SC Greenville’s skyline You have time to ponder many things while companies doing business in Greenville know that against the Blue Ridge sitting in Atlanta traffi c. Things like, “What I don’t?” To learn what Greenville, South Carolina Mountains; free trolley on Main Street do Michelin North America, Milliken, General can do for the future of your business, visit Downtown Electric, BMW and the other 120 Fortune 500 www.ThriveDowntown.com or call 864.239.3735. What’s the difference between RisingThe transformation continues Greenville and Atlanta? BY LYNN SELDON We’ll give you a couple of hours fish eye studios, to think about it. f rances Jumansz xpect world-class cul- Performing Arts brought people ture, superb shopping, farther south.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Logistics Task Force Final Report
    P a g e | 1 FINAL REPORT P a g e | 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CREATION AND PURPOSE OF TASK FORCE 8 HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY 11 NORTH CAROLINA’S FUTURE 13 TASK FORCE METHODOLOGY 16 TASK FORCE MEETINGS 18 SUBCOMMITTEES 20 SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS—AUGUST 2011 21 SEVEN PORTALS STUDY 25 NORTH CAROLINA MARITIME STRATEGY 31 STATE TRANSPORTATION ASSET INVENTORY 36 ROADS 37 RAILROADS 40 AVIATION 43 PORTS 46 OTHER TRANSPORTATION MODES 48 NORTH CAROLINA FOREIGN TRADE ZONE PROGRAM 52 MILITARY 54 AGRICULTURE 58 INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE 60 P a g e | 3 REPORTS TO THE GOVERNOR AND TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS 62 AUGUST 2010 REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR JANUARY 2011 REPORT TO THE JOINT LEGISLATIVE TRANSPORTATION OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2011 REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR REGIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS 65 NORTHEAST REGION 66 EASTERN REGION 68 SOUTHEAST REGION 70 RESEARCH TRIANGLE REGION 75 PIEDMONT TRIAD REGION 76 CHARLOTTE REGION 79 ADVANTAGE WEST REGION 82 RECOMMENDATIONS 86 RECOMMENDATION 1: GOVERNANCE 86 1.1 ONE STOP SHOP 1.2 NORTH CAROLINA BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION 1.3 NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD 1.4 REGIONAL PORTS/VILLAGES RECOMMENDATION 2: COMPETITIVE RAIL ACCESS 91 RECOMMENDATION 3: FOREIGN TRADE ZONES 91 RECOMMENDATION 4: INTERSTATE PARTNERSHIPS 92 RECOMMENDATION 5: MILITARY 92 5.1 NORTH CAROLINA DEFENSE LOGISTICS INITIATIVE 5.2 AIRSPACE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION 5.3 PRESERVATION OF CORRIDORS IMPORTANT TO MILITARY INSTALLATIONS P a g e | 4 RECOMMENDATION 6: NORTH CAROLINA MARITIME STRATEGY 94 RECOMMENDATION 7: AGRICULTURE 95 RECOMMENDATION
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Commission of South Carolina
    BEFORE THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA [Greenville, South Carolina] HEARING # 13-11348 JUNE 24, 2013 6:00 P.M. DOCKET NO. 2013-59-E: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC - Application for Authority to Adjust and Increase Electric Rates and Charges TRANSCRIPT OF TESTIMONY AND PROCEEDINGS VOLUME 2 HEARING BEFORE: Randy MITCHELL , CHAIRMAN , , G. O’Neal HAMILTON , VICE CHAIRMAN ; and COMMISSIONERS John E. ‘Butch’ HOWARD , Elizabeth B. 'Lib' FLEMING , Swain E. WHITFIELD , and Nikiya ‘Nikki’ HALL ADVISOR TO COMMISSION : B. Randall Dong, Esq. STAFF: Jocelyn Boyd, Chief Clerk/Administrator; James Spearman, Ph.D., Executive Assistant to Commissioners; David Stark, Esq., Legal Staff; William O. Richardson and Phil Riley, Advisory Staff; Jo Elizabeth M. Wheat, CVR-CM/M-GNSC, Court Reporter; and Calvin Woods, Hearing Room Assistant APPEARANCES: HEATHER S. SMITH, ESQUIRE, TIMIKA SHAFEEK- HORTON, ESQUIRE, and FRANK R. ELLERBE III, ESQUIRE, representing DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC, APPLICANT COURTNEY DARE EDWARDS, ESQUIRE, representing the SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF REGULATORY STAFF PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF SOUTH CAROLINA 101 EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE POST OFFICE BOX 11649 COLUMBIA , SC 29210 COLUMBIA , SC 29211 WWW .PSC .SC .GOV Docket No. 2013-59-E Duke Energy Carolinas/ Rates & Charges 100 I N D E X PAGE REMARKS BY Rep. P. Mike Burns ................................ 104 Sen. Karl B. Allen ................................ 104 Ann Wilson [for Sen. Michael L. 'Mike' Fair] ...... 105 Rep. Leola Robinson-Simpson ....................... 112 PRELIMINARY MATTERS .................................... 103-113 24. TESTIMONY of LES GARDNER ................................ 113 25. TESTIMONY of REV. PHILIP A. PARIS, SR. ............... 116 26. TESTIMONY of REX O'STEEN ................................ 119 27. TESTIMONY of RUBY ROSADO ............................. 122 Examination by Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Read Political Economy in the Carolinas
    BOARD OF DIRECTORS Edward Lopez, Western Carolina University President Karen Palasek, Barton College Vice President Andrew Taylor, North Carolina State University Secretary Jenna Robinson, Martin Center for Academic Renewal Treasurer, Fellowship Director Adam C. Smith, Johnson & Wales University Managing Director Roy Cordato, John Locke Foundation Journal Editor Peter Calcagno, College of Charleston Workshop Director Mitch Kokai, John Locke Foundation Board Member Jack Sommer, University of North Carolina - Charlotte (Retired) Board Emeritus Classical Liberals in the Carolinas (CLC) was organized for the express purpose of bringing together classical liberal scholars in the Carolinas region. In order to continue to grow the organization and expand its programming, CLC relies on the generosity of like-minded individuals and scholars who believe in its mission. Please consider donating to their fund at www.classicalliberals.org. Copyright © 2020 by Classical Liberals in the Carolinas, Inc. Printed in the USA by Westmoreland Printers Incorporated. Permission is granted to reproduce articles published in this journal, so long as reproduced copies are used for non-profit educational or research purposes. For all reproduction purposes, permission must be obtained from the Editor. Articles in PEC are double blind refereed. Submissions are being accepted through clc. submittable.com. POLITICAL ECONOMY IN THE CAROLINAS 2020 l Vol. 3 FROM THE EDITOR Letter from the Editor Roy Cordato l 5 The Political Economy of the Carolinas Considered Historically: An Introduction Robert Whaples l 7 ARTICLES Classical Liberalism and the History of Economics in the Carolinas Robert Whaples l 11 The Carolinian Economy Through Two World Wars Lee A. Craig l 35 A Brief History of Urbanization in North and South Carolina RJaya Jha & s Fred H.
    [Show full text]
  • Starbucks & Carolina Oaks Dental Care
    VIEW DRONE VIDEO STARBUCKS & CAROLINA OAKS DENTAL CARE Anderson, South Carolina CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM TABLE OF CONTENTS EXCLUSIVELY LISTED BY Investment Overview Peter Couchell, CCIM Robert Schmidt 03 Executive Summary Managing Director/Shareholder Director/Shareholder [email protected] [email protected] 04 Rent Roll & Financials 864 678 5923 864 678 5960 Property Overview 05 Regional Map 06 Market Map 07 Submarket Map 08 Site Map 09 Property Photos Tenant Overview 10 Lease Summaries 11 Tenant Summaries Market Overview 12 Market Analysis 14 Demographics Furman Capital Advisors, LLC 101 E. Washington Street, Suite 400 Greenville, SC 29601 | 864.235.6855 FurmanCapital.com Investment Services Division of NAI Earle Furman INVESTMENT OVERVIEW Executive Summary PROPERTY SUMMARY INVESTMENT SUMMARY Address 1643 - 1645 E Greenville St Anderson, SC 29621 NOI $126,220 Ownership Fee Simple Cap Rate 6.25% Class A List Price $2,030,000 Year Built 2015 Lease Type NNN Building Size ±4,500 SF Starbucks: 5 Yrs Term Remaining Carolina Oaks Dental Care: 8 Yrs Parcel Size ±0.983 Acres Tenancy Multi Occupancy 100% Tenants Starbucks & Carolina Oaks Dental Care Traffic Count ±28,600 VPD (E. Greenville Rd) PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS • Minimal Landlord Responsibilities: Landlord is only responsible for capital items, including structure, roof & parking lot replacement • High Quality Class “A” Construction: Built in 2016, the Seller has taken meticulous care of the property providing a buyer with little risk of future deferred maintenance • Healthy
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Change and Human-Environment Interactions: Implications for Natural Resource Management in Urbanizing Areas
    LANDSCAPE CHANGE AND HUMAN-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN URBANIZING AREAS by Monica Ann Dorning A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography and Urban Regional Analysis Charlotte 2014 Approved by: ______________________________ Dr. Ross K. Meentemeyer ______________________________ Dr. Todd K. BenDor ______________________________ Dr. Sandra M. Clinton ______________________________ Dr. Sara A. Gagné ______________________________ Dr. Jean-Claude Thill ii ©2014 Monica Ann Dorning ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT MONICA ANN DORNING. Landscape change and human-environment interactions: implications for natural resource management in urbanizing areas. (Under the direction of DR. ROSS K. MEENTEMEYER) Worldwide changes in land use and land cover alter the spatial distributions of natural resources and ecosystem functions. Here I examined the pattern and process of landscape change in the Charlotte, North Carolina metropolitan region, to understand how these changes originate from and have influence on human decisions regarding land management and policy formation. First, I simulated future landscape patterns that could arise from conservation-based land use policies and assessed the potential impacts to priority natural resources and landscape composition. Second, I analyzed the process of landscape change as it originates with the decisions of individual forest owners by utilizing a unique combination of individual, site, and landscape level data within a structural equation modeling framework. Third, I used a stated preference survey to examine how those individual decisions may change with new global markets for biofuels. My findings highlight the importance of considering landscape change as a multi-scale process with integrated human, environmental, and spatial components.
    [Show full text]