Maori Purposes Bill (No 2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maori Purposes Bill (No 2) Maori Purposes Bill (No 2) Government Bill As reported from the Maori Affairs Committee Commentary Recommendation The Maori Affairs Committee has examined the Maori Purposes Bill (No 2) and recommends that it be passed with the amendments shown. Background This omnibus bill consists of ten clauses divided into three parts comprising the following proposed amendments: • Part 1 amends the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 in relation to the operations of the Waitangi Tribunal. • Part 2 amends the Broadcasting Act 1989 in order to give effect to technical changes in relation to ministerial responsi- bility for Maori broadcasting policy and Te Reo Whakapuaki Irirangi, the Maori Broadcasting Funding Authority (also known as Te Mangai Paho). • Part 3 amends the Maori Land Amendment and Maori Land Claims Adjustment Act 1926 to provide for an increase in entitlement of free fishing licences to Ngati Tuwharetoa under the fishery licensing scheme for Lake Taupo. It is intended that the three parts be divided into three separate bills at the committee of the whole House stage. 205--2 2 Maori Purposes (No 2) Commentary Amendments to Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 (Part 1) Two submissions relate to Part 1, which proposes amendments to the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975. These submissions support the swift passage of the bill, and emphasise the need for urgency in bringing the Wellington Tenths claim (Wai 145) to a conclusion. The claim was filed with the Waitangi Tribunal in 1987, and hear- ings were held over a protracted period between 1991 and 1999. The submitters note that swift passage of the bill is essential to the validation of the status of the tribunal, which went through changes of membership after the hearings commenced. Passage of the bill would allow the release of the Wellington Tenths inquiry report, and avoid the need for the claim to be revisited by a new tribunal. One of the submitters is concerned that limits and safeguards should be placed on the circumstances under which the Chairperson of the tribunal could replace members and presiding officers of a tribunal, and that the conditions for the use of this power be clearly spelt-out in the legislation. Part 1 proposes additional clauses to the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 to statutorily validate changes of membership that occurred in the panels of the Wellington Tenths (Wai 145), Kaipara (Wai 674) and Hauraki (Wai 686) inquiries. The amendments proposed include the express provisions for the replacement of members and presiding officers; the appointment of acting presiding officers; and specify the circumstances and conditions required before these new statutory powers can be exercised. The bill proposes that the Chairperson of the tribunal be empowered to replace or substitute members due to illness or unforeseen circum- stances during the course of tribunal hearings, which typically last for a number of years. The move to three - or four - person tribunals also means that replacements may be necessary to maintain a quo- rum (presiding officer and two other members, one of whom must be Maori). The proposed power to appoint a replacement presiding officer or replacement member may be exercised only when: • the presiding officer or member has ceased to hold office, or • the presiding officer or member is unable to continue to par- ticipate in the inquiry due to his or her mental or physical condition, or • the Chairperson is of the opinion that it would be unreasona- ble to expect the presiding officer or member to continue to participate in the inquiry due to personal circumstances, and Commentary Maori Purposes (No 2) 3 • the Chairperson is satisfied that there is an adequate record of the inquiry that has already been heard by the tribunal, and that it is reasonable to expect the person, appointed as a replacement presiding officer or member, to review the record of that inquiry. The Act currently requires the presiding officers to be either the Chairperson, a Judge of the Maori Land Court or a barrister or solicitor of the High Court with at least seven years standing, appointed by the Chairperson. Under proposed new clause 5AD(2) of the Second Schedule, the Chairperson may exercise the power of appointing an acting presiding officer only if he or she considers that the tribunal can properly continue to exercise its functions to inquire into the particular claim or other matter with an acting presiding officer. Any person appointed an acting presiding officer would have the same powers as a presiding officer under the Act and would be able to exercise those powers only for the period of time specified by the Chairperson. The Green Party member is concerned about the appropriateness of tampering with the conditions surrounding a judicial forum such as the Waitangi Tribunal. There are significant natural justice issues that occur when tribunal members are replaced after evidence has already been heard during an inquiry. However, there is currently no provision in the Act that validates the tribunal's power to replace or substitute members during a tribunal inquiry, leaving open the possi- bility of a challenge to membership changes, which could necessi- tate having to start an inquiry over again. This would apply to the three inquiries listed above, but the implications could be more far ranging, and affect other claims, such as the Tauranga inquiry (Wai 215) and the Indigenous Flora and Fauna inquiry (Wai 262). The Treaty of Waitangi Amendment Act 1985 provided for historic claims to be lodged with the Tribunal dating to 1840, but no provi- sion was made in that Act to cater for long-term inquiries. In 1996, the Acting Registrar of the Waitangi Tribunal sought advice on the powers of the Chairperson of the tribunal to reconsti- tute tribunals where members are unable to continue in office. In response to this request, the Solicitor-General advised that if the tribunal is to have express power to permit the substitution of a presiding officer or panel members, the Act should be amended to make sure that the intention to depart from the standard principles of natural justice, to meet the needs of the tribunal process, are indi- cated in terms that are clear and unambiguous. The opinion of the 4 Maori Purposes (No 2) Commentary Crown Law Office is that there is a legitimate concern that claims be brought to a conclusion, and that the tribunal has the power to replace persons unable to continue, to ensure the efficient running of hearings. Advice we received from Te Puni KOkiri emphasises that any power to appoint a replacement member, a presiding officer, or an acting presiding officer must be limited to circumstances that require such appointment in order to enable the hearing to continue and prevent the extreme circumstance of an inquiry having to start again. We are satisfied that the bill as drafted reflects advice given to Te Puni Kokiri by the Solicitor-General and the Crown Law Office. We recommend that proposed new clause 5AD(2) of the Second Schedule be deleted from the bill, because it would not offer any protection to either the claimants or the Crown. The amendment as proposed by the committee will remove the exemption provided in proposed new clause 5AD(2) of the Second Schedule of the Act. Therefore, clause 5(2) of the Second Schedule will apply to the appointment of an acting presiding officer. Clause 5(2) of the Second Schedule provides that only a member of the tribunal who is a barrister or solicitor of the High Court of at least seven years standing, shall be qualified for appointment as presiding officer under clause 5(1)(a)(iii) of the Second Schedule. Green Party view on Part 1 The Green Party member considers that clause 5AC(2)(c) gives the Chairperson too broad a discretion. Clause 5AC(2)(c) enables the Chairperson to replace a member when he or she is of the opinion that the member or presiding officer is unable to continue due to personal circumstances. While the clause implies that the member will not be removed without their consent, there is no express protection. Te Puni K6kiri advised that the individual members were protected from unfair removal by the principles of natural justice, which would allow them to contest the decision in the High Court. The Green Party member is not satisfied with that response and is concerned that there is no requirement for the replaced officer to agree to their replacement. The Green Party member would prefer the clause be reworded to ensure the presiding officer or member being replaced due to personal reasons agrees to that course of action. Commentary Maori Purposes (No 2) 5 Amendments to the Broadcasting Act 1989 (Part 2) One submission disagrees with the transfer of responsibility for Te Mangai Paho from the Minister of Broadcasting to the Minister of Maori Affairs, due to a concern that the transfer would incur addi- tional costs to taxpayers. Te Puni K6kiri advised us that no addi- tional cost to taxpayers will result from the transfer of ministerial responsibility, which requires small technical amendments to the Broadcasting Act 1989. The majority of us have no concerns relating to this part, and recommend that it be passed unamended. National Party view on Part 2 The National Party members are opposed to these changes on the basis that Te Mangai Paho should continue to be accountable to the Minister of Broadcasting. Amendments to the Maori Land Amendment and Maori Land Claims Adjustment Act 1926 (Part 3) One submission disagrees with the increase of fishing licences on Lake Taupo for Ngati Tuwharetoa. The submitter contends that trout fishing is not a customary right and that payment for fishing licences assists in restocking the Lake Taupo fish population.
Recommended publications
  • Protecting Our Children: Services for Children in Care
    The Treasury Budget 2011 Information Release Release Document June 2011 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2011 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: [1] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [2] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to maintain the current constitutional conventions protecting the confidentiality of advice tendered by ministers and officials [3] 9(2)(g)(i) - to maintain the effective conduct of public affairs through the free and frank expression of opinions [4] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [5] 9(2)(k) - to prevent the disclosure of official information for improper gain or improper advantage [6] 9(2)(j) - to enable the Crown to negotiate without disadvantage or prejudice [7] 6(a) - to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the government [8] 9(2)(h) - to maintain legal professional privilege [9] 6(c) - to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial [10] 9(2)(d) - to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand [11] 9(2)(i) - to enable the Crown to carry out commercial activities without disadvantage or prejudice. Where information has been withheld, a numbered reference to the applicable section of the Official Information Act has been made, as listed above.
    [Show full text]
  • Māori and Aboriginal Women in the Public Eye
    MĀORI AND ABORIGINAL WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE REPRESENTING DIFFERENCE, 1950–2000 MĀORI AND ABORIGINAL WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE REPRESENTING DIFFERENCE, 1950–2000 KAREN FOX THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fox, Karen. Title: Māori and Aboriginal women in the public eye : representing difference, 1950-2000 / Karen Fox. ISBN: 9781921862618 (pbk.) 9781921862625 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Women, Māori--New Zealand--History. Women, Aboriginal Australian--Australia--History. Women, Māori--New Zealand--Social conditions. Women, Aboriginal Australian--Australia--Social conditions. Indigenous women--New Zealand--Public opinion. Indigenous women--Australia--Public opinion. Women in popular culture--New Zealand. Women in popular culture--Australia. Indigenous peoples in popular culture--New Zealand. Indigenous peoples in popular culture--Australia. Dewey Number: 305.4880099442 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover image: ‘Maori guide Rangi at Whakarewarewa, New Zealand, 1935’, PIC/8725/635 LOC Album 1056/D. National Library of Australia, Canberra. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Abbreviations . ix Illustrations . xi Glossary of Māori Words . xiii Note on Usage . xv Introduction . 1 Chapter One .
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicting Digital Futures
    1 Conflicting digital futures An analysis of the New Zealand digital television debate in relation to public service principles and commercial imperatives Yvonne Brill December 21st, 2012 School of Communication Studies, AUT University A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Communication Studies 1 2 Abstract The freedom to provide a wide range of content from diverse sources allows the media to fulfil its role as facilitator of the public sphere. Having access to a wide range of content from diverse sources is necessary if citizens are to fully participate in the democratic process. However, provision of non-commercial and public service content has proved problematic in New Zealand’s deregulated broadcasting environment. During the 1980s and 1990s the international trend toward deregulated national media markets put public service media under considerable pressure. In a deregulated environment commercial interests flourished, often at the expense of the public interest. This was certainly the case with broadcasting. Since then, New Zealand’s television broadcasting market has struggled to provide a balance of commercial and non-commercial content for a variety of reasons. But the digital era of broadcasting brings with it new opportunities for public service broadcasting provision. A by-product of the government’s decision to begin the switchover from analogue to digital broadcasting was the establishment of two non-commercial digital channels, administered by state-owned broadcaster, TVNZ. However, less than five years after the digital initiatives were announced, both channels had ceased broadcasting and once again the market became dominated by commercial interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Māori and Aboriginal Women in the Public Eye
    MĀORI AND ABORIGINAL WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE REPRESENTING DIFFERENCE, 1950–2000 MĀORI AND ABORIGINAL WOMEN IN THE PUBLIC EYE REPRESENTING DIFFERENCE, 1950–2000 KAREN FOX THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at http://epress.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Fox, Karen. Title: Māori and Aboriginal women in the public eye : representing difference, 1950-2000 / Karen Fox. ISBN: 9781921862618 (pbk.) 9781921862625 (ebook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references and index. Subjects: Women, Māori--New Zealand--History. Women, Aboriginal Australian--Australia--History. Women, Māori--New Zealand--Social conditions. Women, Aboriginal Australian--Australia--Social conditions. Indigenous women--New Zealand--Public opinion. Indigenous women--Australia--Public opinion. Women in popular culture--New Zealand. Women in popular culture--Australia. Indigenous peoples in popular culture--New Zealand. Indigenous peoples in popular culture--Australia. Dewey Number: 305.4880099442 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover image: ‘Maori guide Rangi at Whakarewarewa, New Zealand, 1935’, PIC/8725/635 LOC Album 1056/D. National Library of Australia, Canberra. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press Printed by Griffin Press This edition © 2011 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgements . vii Abbreviations . ix Illustrations . xi Glossary of Māori Words . xiii Note on Usage . xv Introduction . 1 Chapter One .
    [Show full text]
  • A White American Female Civil Rights Attorney in New Zealand: What Maori Experience(S) Teach Me About the Cause Marguerite L
    William Mitchell Law Review Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 10 2001 A White American Female Civil Rights Attorney in New Zealand: What Maori Experience(s) Teach Me about the Cause Marguerite L. Spencer Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr Recommended Citation Spencer, Marguerite L. (2001) "A White American Female Civil Rights Attorney in New Zealand: What Maori Experience(s) Teach Me about the Cause," William Mitchell Law Review: Vol. 28: Iss. 1, Article 10. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/wmlr/vol28/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in William Mitchell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law 09_FINAL.SPENCER 08.31.01.DOC 9/7/2001 11:55 AM Spencer: A White American Female Civil Rights Attorney in New Zealand: Wha A WHITE AMERICAN FEMALE CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY IN NEW ZEALAND: WHAT MAORI EXPERIENCE(S) TEACH ME ABOUT THE CAUSE † Marguerite L. Spencer I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................256 II. MAORI EXPERIENCE(S) IN CONTEXT .....................................257 A. A Brief Overview of Race and Identity ............................257 1. Contemporary Inter- and Intra-racial Tensions.............257 2. Maori Culture and Identity.......................................262 B. Te Tiriti o Waitangi—The Treaty of Waitangi ................266 1. Historical Foundations of the Treaty...........................266 2. Current Treaty Claims .............................................272 3. The Treaty and Rangatiratanga................................276 4. The Treaty and the Political Process ...........................283 5.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Medical Council of New Zealand
    A HISTORY OF THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF NEW ZEALAND Compiled by Richard Sainsbury B 1 ABOUT THE AUTHOR Richard Sainsbury is Emeritus Professor of Geriatric Medicine University of Otago, Christchurch. He was an elected member of the Medical Council of New Zealand from 2009 to 2015. He has an interest in the portrayal of ageing and older people in literature. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks are due to a large number of people for their help in preparing this book. Georgina Jones’s account of her time on Council formed a very sound basis for the present book, and she has been extensively quoted. Former Chairs of Council Tony Baird, Robin Briant, and John Adams gave generously of their time in providing historical detail and reflections on the issues Council faced during their respective tenures. Bill Brabazon, a former Council member, provided interesting detail about the 1970s. Ian St George provided important insights derived from his long association with the Medical Council, particularly about the development of Cole’s Medical practice in New Zealand and the development of continuing professional development strategy. John Buchanan provided valuable information about the Brych affair and proofread that chapter to ensure accuracy. Dr Joanna MacDonald’s article in Medical Council News provided the basis for the section on the work of the Health Committee. John Nacey and Steven Lillis are to be thanked for their thoughtful and detailed contributions to the education and New Zealand Registration Examination sections 3 respectively. Heather Thomson contributed to the section on lay membership and the development of cultural policy. Lynne Urquhart, Joan Crawford, Peter Searle, Susan Yorke, and David Dunbar made useful contributions about recent Council work.
    [Show full text]
  • Māori Participation and Representation
    Māori Participation and Representation: An Investigation into Māori reported experiences of Participation and Representation within the policy process post-MMP _____________________________________ A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Josephine Clarke _______________________________________ University of Canterbury 2015 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ABSTRACT iv LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS vi GLOSSARY vii CHAPTER ONE Introduction and Literature Review 1 CHAPTER TWO Methodology 23 CHAPTER THREE Foreshore and Seabed Act 2004 37 CHAPTER FOUR Marine and Coastal (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 65 CHAPTER FIVE Whānau Ora 86 CHAPTER SIX Conclusion 108 APPENDECIES A Māori Research Advisory Group Form 135 B Unstructured Interview Prompts 137 C Information Sheet 138 D Consent Form 140 E Regional Boundaries 142 BIBLIOGRAPHY 143 iii Acknowledgements There are a number of people and organizations that I would like to thank for their assistance during the writing of this thesis. Most importantly I would like to extend my gratitude all those who imparted their individual knowledge, experiences, perceptions and wisdom to this research as participants. I am especially grateful to Sue Rudman, the Bream Bay Trust and all the E Tu Whānau team who took me to Waitangi and facilitated not only countless interviews, but also gave me a remarkable experience of seeing Whānau Ora funding in action. Similarly I would like to thank another person, who wishes to remain anonymous, who went above and beyond to assist a fellow student in facilitating countless invaluable interviews within the South Island. Thanks also to Lindsay Te Ata o Tu MacDonald, Ripeka Tamanui-Hurunui and Abby Suszko for providing cultural guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSUE 27 Ngati Porou Niue Appeal “Uplifts” Mana of Maori Photo Courtesy of Gisborne Herald
    Te Runanga o Ngati Porou NATI LINK ISSUE 27 Ngati Porou Niue Appeal “uplifts” mana of Maori Photo courtesy of Gisborne Herald Radio Ngati Porou DJs (back left) Kahu Waitoa, Isobel Solomon, Rev Boyce Te Maro called with a pledge while celebrity Emily Ron Hughes and (front left) Darylene Rogers and Tawhiri Hawthorne(centre back) and her sister Sophia Hawthorne were Dalton-Reedy drumming-up pledges at the station supporting Niue Day with DJ Kahu Waitoa In a marathon effort Radio Ngati Porou raised a relief fund of over as a symbol of our regret at the great losses he had endured,” said Te $53,000 only two days after Cyclone Heta devastated the tiny Pacific Runanga o Ngati Porou ceo Amohaere Houkamau. Island of Niue. A few days later kaumatua Titiwhai Harawira spoke on Radio Ngati The approach taken by Radio Ngati Porou’s manager Heni Porou of the immense pride she had felt when she attended the ceremony. Tawhiwhirangi, to initiate the radiothon quickly and without hesitation, “Congratulations, thank you Ngati Porou for uplifting the mana of Maori. highlights the unique ability and flexibility of Iwi radio stations to mobilise This gesture shows the unique way of giving, and showing aroha, in a whole community in times ofcrisis. Maori culture. I felt honoured to be part of the ceremony.” Radio Ngati Porou held a 24-hour radiothon to raise relief funds for Pledges were steady throughout the 24-hour radiothon, but eased up Niue. They also raised awareness far-and-wide of Niue’s plight, with in the wee-small hours, with a last minute flurry to take the proceeds to pledges received from donors around the country and overseas, wishing the $53,000 mark.
    [Show full text]
  • Being Explicit About Culture: Māori, Neoliberalism, and the New
    ILANA GERSHON Being Explicit about Culture: Maori,¯ Neoliberalism, and the New Zealand Parliament ABSTRACT In this article, I explore how people use the culture concept in legislatures to understand the minorities they legislate for and about. I focus on recent debates in the New Zealand parliament over whether the indigenous Maori¯ are a cultural group or a racial group. A Westminster parliament system encourages these debates, in which political parties argue that Maori¯ are either cultural or racial but not both. For the ruling Labour Party and its allies, Maori¯ are cultural; for their opposition, the National Party and its allies, Maori¯ are a racial group. This division is possible only because of the legislators’ neoliberal assumptions about identity categories. To complicate these political divisions, Maori¯ MPs currently belong to political parties from all parts of the political spectrum, and their effectiveness as culture bearers in a parliamentary context can disrupt the terms of this debate. [Keywords: democratic representation, indigeneity, culture concept, legislatures, New Zealand] HEN ANTHROPOLOGISTS turn their ethno- legislative action. Each category contains its own legisla- W graphic attention to how the culture concept tive possibilities and constraints. I use a limited form of dis- travels, they find that institutional contexts configure what course analysis to analyze the competing classifications po- counts as cultural and what counts as acultural. In do- litical parties use to discuss legislation and policies viewed ing so, these institutions also determine the consequences as addressing Maori¯ concerns (see Chock 1991, 1996 for of classifying with the culture concept, both for the peo- parallel analyses of classificatory categories used in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treaty of Waitangi and the Relationship Between the Crown and Maori in New Zealand, 28 Brook
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 The rT eaty of Waitangi and the Relationship Between the Crown and Maori in New Zealand Noel Cox Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Recommended Citation Noel Cox, The Treaty of Waitangi and the Relationship Between the Crown and Maori in New Zealand, 28 Brook. J. Int'l L. (2002). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol28/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. File: Cox Base Macro final.doc Created on: 10/14/2002 7:35 PM Last Printed: 4/28/2003 3:24 PM THE TREATY OF WAITANGI AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CROWN AND MAORI IN NEW ZEALAND Noel Cox* I. INTRODUCTION HE orthodox legitimacy of the Crown,1 in those countries T that derive their constitutional principles from Great Britain, is the legitimacy of the inherited legal form. So long as government is conducted in accordance with the rule of law, and meets the aspirations of the majority of the population, the legitimacy of the government based on such a ground has been little questioned. This legitimacy alone, however, is not necessarily sufficient. Nor does it alone explain the general acceptance of the current regime in New Zealand. There exists a second, potentially po- tent, source of legitimacy in New Zealand — the Treaty of Wai- tangi (“Treaty”). As the moral, if not legal, authority for Euro- pean settlement of New Zealand, this 1840 compact between the Crown and Maori chiefs has become increasingly important as a constitutional founding document for New Zealand.2 As a party to the Treaty, the Crown may have acquired a new and significant source of legitimacy as the body with which the Maori have a partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the New Zealand Media Ownership 2014 Report
    JMAD New Zealand Media Ownership Report 2014 Published: 2014 December 5 Author: Merja Myllylahti This New Zealand Ownership Report 2014 is the fourth published by AUT’s Centre for Journalism, Media and Democracy (JMAD). The report finds that the New Zealand media market has failed to produce new, innovative media outlets, and that all the efforts to establish non-profit outlets have proved unsustainable. The report confirms the general findings of previous reports that New Zealand media space has remained highly commercial. It also confirms the financialisation of media ownership in the form of banks and fund managers. The report also observes that in 2014 convergence between New Zealand mass media and the communications sector generally was in full swing. Companies, such as Spark (former Telecom NZ), started to compete head-to-head with the traditional broadcasters on the online on-demand video and television markets. The American online video subscription service Netflix is entering the NZ market in March 2015. Additionally, the report notes evidence of uncomfortable alliances between citizen media, politicians, PR companies and legacy media. As Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics book revealed, the National Party and PR practitioners used the Whale Oil blog to drive their own agendas. Also, events related to Maori TV, TVNZ and Scoop raise questions about political interference in media affairs. It is now evident that the boundaries between mainstream media, bloggers, public relations practitioners and politicians are blurring. Key events and trends concerning New Zealand media Financialisation of mass media ownership confirmed Substantial changes in Fairfax, APN and MediaWorks ownership Competition heats up in online television and video markets Turbulence at Maori TV Blurred lines among politicians, bloggers, journalists and PR practitioners The JMAD New Zealand media ownership reports are available here: http://www.aut.ac.nz/study- at-aut/study-areas/communications/media-networks/journalism,-media-and-democracy-research- centre/journalists-and-projects 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial List for Announcement on 17 November 2008
    Ministerial List for Announcement on 17 November 2008 THE CABINET Portfolios Other responsibilities 1 John Key Prime Minister Ministerial Services Minister of Tourism Minister in Charge of the NZ Security Intelligence Service Minister Responsible for the GCSB 2 Hon Bill English Deputy Prime Minister Minister of Finance Minister for Infrastructure 3 Gerry Brownlee Minister for Economic Development Leader of the House Minister of Energy and Resources Associate Minister for the Rugby World Cup 4 Simon Power Minister of Justice Minister Responsible for the Law Commission Minister for State Owned Enterprises Minister of Commerce Associate Minister of Finance Deputy Leader of the House 5 Hon Tony Ryall Minister of Health Minister of State Services 6 Hon Dr Nick Smith Minister for the Environment Minister for Climate Change Issues Minister for ACC 139710v1 1 7 Judith Collins Minister of Police Minister of Corrections Minister of Veterans’ Affairs 8 Anne Tolley Minister of Education Minister Responsible for the Education Review Office Minister for Tertiary Education 9 Christopher Finlayson Attorney-General [Includes responsibility for Serious Fraud Office] Minister for Treaty of Waitangi Negotiations Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage 10 Hon David Carter Minister of Agriculture Minister for Biosecurity Minister of Forestry 11 Hon Murray McCully Minister of Foreign Affairs Minister for the Rugby World Cup Minister for Sport and Recreation 12 Tim Groser Minister of Trade Associate Minister of Foreign Affairs Minister of Conservation Associate
    [Show full text]