DOCSLIB.ORG

California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment: Statewide Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California's Fourth Climate Change Assessment: Statewide Summary CALIFORNIA’S FOURTH CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT Statewide Summary Report Coordinating Agencies: Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment alifornia is a global leader in using, investing in, and advancing research to set proactive climate change policy, and its Climate Change Assessments provide the scientifc foundation for understanding climate- related vulnerability at the local scale and informing resilience actions. The Climate Change Assessments C directly inform State policies, plans, programs, and guidance to promote effective and integrated action to safeguard California from climate change. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment (Fourth Assessment) advances actionable science that serves the growing needs of state and local-level decision-makers from a variety of sectors. Tis cutting-edge research initiative is comprised of a wide-ranging body of technical reports, including rigorous, comprehensive climate change scenarios at a scale suitable for illuminating regional vulnerabilities and localized adaptation strategies in California; datasets and tools that improve integration of observed and projected knowledge about climate change into decision- making; and recommendations and information to directly inform vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies for California’s energy sector, water resources and management, oceans and coasts, forests, wildfres, agriculture, biodiversity and habitat, and public health. In addition, these technical reports have been distilled into summary reports and a brochure, allowing the public and decision-makers to easily access relevant fndings from the Fourth Assessment. • A concise summary of the Fourth Assessment’s most important fndings and conclusions. • An in-depth report on how California’s people, built KEY FINDINGS environment, and ecosystems will be impacted by climate change and how we can proactively adapt, based on the Fourth Assessment’s fndings. • Reports summarizing Fourth Assessment fndings to STATEWIDE SUMMARY provide a state of the science for nine regions, the ocean and coast, tribal communities, and climate justice in California. SUMMARIES FOR REGIONS AND COMMUNITIES • Academic research that provides robust and detailed results on resilience and vulnerability to climate change. ORIGINAL RESEARCH TO • A shared foundation of updated climate change INFORM POLICY AND ACTION projections, data and ecosystem models developed for use by Assessment authors to permit cross-comparability of results and ensure the fndings consider a robust range ASSESSMENT FOUNDATION: UPDATED CLIMATE PROJECTIONS AND DATA of future climate conditions. These data are available to the public via Cal-Adapt.org. All research contributing to the Fourth Assessment was peer-reviewed to ensure scientifc rigor as well as, where applicable, appropriate representation of the practitioners and stakeholders to whom each report applies. For the full suite of Fourth Assessment research products, please visit: www.ClimateAssessment.ca.gov Fourth Climate Change Assessment Statewide Summary Report | 2 California Regions CLIMATE NORTH JUSTICE COAST REGION SACRAMENTO TRIBAL VALLEY COMMUNITIES REGION SIERRA SAN FRANCISCO NEVADA BAY AREA REGION REGION SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY REGION CENTRAL COAST OCEAN REGION AND COAST COMMUNITIES INLAND DESERTS LOS ANGELES REGION REGION SAN DIEGO REGION The Statewide Summary Report presents an overview of the main fndings from California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Produced as part of a volunteer initiative by leading climate experts, this summary report aims to translate the state of climate science into useful information for decision-makers and practitioners to catalyze action that will beneft regions, the ocean and coast, frontline communities, and tribal and indigenous communities. The Statewide Summary Report presents fndings in the context of existing climate science, including strategies to adapt to climate impacts and key research gaps needed to spur additional progress on safeguarding California from climate change. Fourth Climate Change Assessment Statewide Summary Report | 3 Statewide Summary Report Authors COORDINATING LEAD CONTRIBUTING Chris Jones John Radke AUTHORS AUTHORS UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Julie Kalansky David Roland-Holst Louise Bedsworth, David Ackerly UC Berkeley Scripps Institution of UC Berkeley California Governor’s Oceanography John Andrew Scott Samuelson Offce of Planning and California Department of Dan Kammen UC Irvine Research Water Resources UC Berkeley Alan Sanstad Surabhi Karambelkar Lawrence Berkeley Dan Cayan, Maximilian Aufammer UC Berkeley University of Arizona National Laboratory Scripps Institution of Rupa Basu Nuin-Tara Key Benjamin Sleeter Oceanography California Ofce of California Governor’s US Geological Survey Environmental Health Ofce of Planning and David Stoms Guido Franco, Hazard Assessment Research California Energy California Energy Neil Berg Michael Kleeman Commission Commission UC Los Angeles UC Davis James Torne Hilda Blanco Millie Levin UC Davis LEAD AUTHORS University of Southern California Ofce of Jason Vargo California Emergency Services California Department of Leah Fisher, Carolyn Cook Jay Lund Public Health California Governor’s California Department of UC Davis Max Wei Offce of Planning and Food and Agriculture Amber Mahone Lawrence Berkeley E3 National Laboratory Research Ivana Cvijanovic Lawrence Livermore Michael L. Mann Leroy Westerling Sonya Ziaja, National Laboratory Te George Washington UC Merced California Public Utilities Larry Dale University Susan Wilhelm Lawrence Berkeley Commission Josué Medellín-Azuara California Energy National Laboratory UC Merced Commission Eric Fournier Nicole Meyer-Morse A. Park Williams UC Los Angeles California Ofce of Lamont-Doherty Earth Christina Greene Emergency Services Observatory of Columbia University of Arizona Meredith Millet University Amrith Gunasekara California Department of Xiangmei Wu California Department of Public Health California Ofce of Food and Agriculture Max Moritz Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Ellen Hanak UC Santa Barbara Public Policy Institute of Jennifer Phillips Erika Zavaleta California California Ocean UC Santa Cruz Michael Hanemann Protection Council Arizona State University David Pierce Jelena Hartman Scripps Institution of California State Water Oceanography Resources Control Board Fourth Climate Change Assessment Statewide Summary Report | 4 8/2018 PEER REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Chair: Robert Lempert, Creation of this report would not have been possible RAND Corporation without the contributions of many people. First, we would like to thank all of the contributing authors Phil Duffy, who took time to develop content, review material, Woods Hole Research Center and support the development of this report. We would also like to thank the Fourth Assessment State Team, Chris Field, including Susan Wilhelm, Jim Torne, Joey Wraithwall, Stanford University Jamie Anderson, and Grayson Hough for their coordination and technical editing support, and Della Juliette Finzi Hart, Gilleran and her design team. A huge thank you to Beth U.S. Geological Survey Hotchkiss, who provided critical support on references David Graves, and generating a bibliography for this report. Saintsbury Winery Tis report also benefted from the thoughtful comments and insights of the peer review committee, who reviewed Lara Kueppers, and provided feedback on earlier drafs. Tank you to University of California, Berkeley Rob Lempert who chaired this committee, and to all of Robert A. Leiter, FAICP the committee members listed here. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment was supported by funding Peter Moyle, from the California Energy Commission (CEC), the University of California, Davis California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA), and contributions from researchers supported by external Jonathan Parfrey, funds (see Appendix A for the complete research Climate Resolve portfolio). Stephanie Pincetl, Any errors that remain in this report are the University of California, Los Angeles responsibility of the coordinating lead authors. Margaret Torn, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CITATION: Bedsworth, Louise, Dan Cayan, Guido Franco, Leah Fisher, Sonya Ziaja. (California Governor’s Sarah White, Ofce of Planning and Research, Scripps Institution California Workforce Development Board of Oceanography, California Energy Commission, California Public Utilities Commission). 2018. Statewide Summary Report. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Publication number: SUM- CCCA4-2018-013. This report summarizes the results of work sponsored by the California Natural Resources Agency and California Energy Commission, in the context of broader scientifc literature. The information presented here does not necessarily represent the views of the funding agencies or the State of California. Fourth Climate Change Assessment Statewide Summary Report | 5 8/2018 Table of Contents Introduction to California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment ...........................................................................................2 California Regions ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Statewide Summary Report Authors .................................................................................................................................4 Summary of Key Findings from the Fourth Assessment ..........................................................................................................8
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Cultural Response in the Prehistoric American Southwest
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey Fall 2009 Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest Larry Benson U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] Michael S. Berry Bureau of Reclamation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Benson, Larry and Berry, Michael S., "Climate Change and Cultural Response In The Prehistoric American Southwest" (2009). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 725. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/725 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. CLIMATE CHANGE AND CULTURAL RESPONSE IN THE PREHISTORIC AMERICAN SOUTHWEST Larry V. Benson and Michael S. Berry ABSTRACT Comparison of regional tree-ring cutting-date distributions from the southern Col- orado Plateau and the Rio Grande region with tree-ring-based reconstructions of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) and with the timing of archaeological stage transitions indicates that Southwestern Native American cultures were peri- odically impacted by major climatic oscillations between A.D. 860 and 1600. Site- specifi c information indicates that aggregation, abandonment, and out-migration from many archaeological regions occurred during several widespread mega- droughts, including the well-documented middle-twelfth- and late-thirteenth- century droughts. We suggest that the demographic response of southwestern Native Americans to climate variability primarily refl ects their dependence on an inordinately maize-based subsistence regimen within a region in which agricul- ture was highly sensitive to climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Resilient Watershed & Fire Management
    PANDEMIC RECOVERY AND BEYOND Resilient Watersheds and Fire Management California is in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic during the second-worst megadrought in the past 1,200 years.1 Simultaneously,2020 was named the largest wildfire season recorded in California’s modern history,and included the first “gigafire”– the August Complex fire,which burned more than 1 million acres.2 The drought-fire-flood cycle. Drought and fire intensification are intrinsically linked [see graphic on page 2]: Drought increases fire risk while wildfires limit and impair our water supplies. Drying of vegetation from drought creates more fuel for fires. Fire reduces forest carbon sequestration,therefore releasing more greenhouse gases,causing air temperatures to increase. With increased temperatures,more moisture evaporates from land and lakes,rivers and other bodies of water. These waterbodies are additionally impaired because fire erodes the landscape, allowing more runoff and debris into our water supplies. In a post-fire landscape,vegetation crucial for groundwater recharge can take years to regrow. With the pandemic complicating and stressing resource management and emergency response, capacity and priorities,a pause in forest-management approaches, particularly controlled burns,increases our current vulnerability and leaves In 2020, five of California’s six largest fires Californians in a heightened state of risk. Agencies at all levels of governance must in modern history burned simultaneously. develop strategies to contend with the multi-threat challenges that Californians Source:California’s Wildfire Management and Resilience are experiencing now and will continue to experience in the years to come. Plan.10/10/20 draft (numbers not finalized).
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy Into a New Decade
    1 2 0 2 . K R O W T E N N O I T A T P A D A E T A M I L A D V A N C I N G T H E C S T N A T I O N A L F I S H , N A L P W I L D L I F E , A N D D N A , E P L A N T S C L I M A T E F I L D L A D A P T A T I O N I W , H S T R A T E G Y I N T O S I F L A A N E W D E C A D E N O I T A N Advancing the National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy into a New Decade Contributors Joe Burns, USFS/Office of Sustainability Mike Langston, U.S. Geological and Climate Survey/South Central Climate Adaptation Whisper Camel-Means, Confederated Science Center Salish and Kootenai Tribes Dara Marks-Marino, Institute for Tribal Nikki Cooley, Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals Environmental Professionals Tracy Melvin, Michigan State University Karen Cozzetto, Institute for Tribal Robert Newman, University of North Dakota Environmental Professionals Rachael Novak, Bureau of Indian Rob Croll, Great Lakes Indian Fish and Affairs/Tribal Resilience Program Wildlife Commission Madeleine Rubenstein, U.S. Geological Aimee Delach, Defenders of Wildlife Survey/National Climate Adaptation Science Maggie Ernest Johnson, Association of Fish Center and Wildlife Agencies Ted Weber, Defenders of Wildlife Roger Griffis, NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service This report was reviewed by members of the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies’ Climate Adaptation Committee and the National Fish, Wildlife, and Plants Climate Adaptation Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrological Droughts in the Southern Andes (40–45°S)
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Hydrological droughts in the southern Andes (40–45°S) from an ensemble experiment using CMIP5 and CMIP6 models Rodrigo Aguayo1, Jorge León‑Muñoz2,3*, René Garreaud4,5 & Aldo Montecinos6,7 The decrease in freshwater input to the coastal system of the Southern Andes (40–45°S) during the last decades has altered the physicochemical characteristics of the coastal water column, causing signifcant environmental, social and economic consequences. Considering these impacts, the objectives were to analyze historical severe droughts and their climate drivers, and to evaluate the hydrological impacts of climate change in the intermediate future (2040–2070). Hydrological modelling was performed in the Puelo River basin (41°S) using the Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model. The hydrological response and its uncertainty were compared using diferent combinations of CMIP projects (n = 2), climate models (n = 5), scenarios (n = 3) and univariate statistical downscaling methods (n = 3). The 90 scenarios projected increases in the duration, hydrological defcit and frequency of severe droughts of varying duration (1 to 6 months). The three downscaling methodologies converged to similar results, with no signifcant diferences between them. In contrast, the hydroclimatic projections obtained with the CMIP6 and CMIP5 models found signifcant climatic (greater trends in summer and autumn) and hydrological (longer droughts) diferences. It is recommended that future climate impact assessments adapt the new simulations as more CMIP6 models become available. Anthropogenic climate change has increased the probability of extreme events in the mid-latitudes of the South- ern Hemisphere, mainly those linked to severe droughts 1. Projections indicate that these drought events may increase in extent, frequency and magnitude as they superimpose on the gradual decrease in precipitation2,3 and a signifcant increase in heat waves 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry 1 Anthropogenic Influence on Climate Change
    Henry 1 Anthropogenic Influence on Climate Change Induced Drought in the American Southwest Katherine Henry Submitted to the Faculty of the Honors College of the Oklahoma State University in fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Degree May 2019 Henry 2 Abstract Anthropogenic influence on climate change induced drought in the predominantly arid region of the American Southwest plays a major role in the effects it has over climate, environment, and sustainability. Topics such as fossil fuels, megadroughts, sustainability, and human roles are addressed specifically. Background and discussion sections are included as a literature review that goes over the different variables involving anthropogenic influence on climate change induced drought. Drought and climate change and natural phenomena such as monsoons are found to be linked together. However, human influences from fossil fuels and water resource usage are also a significant factor in climate change induced drought in the American Southwest. This paper demonstrates how human influence on global warming has caused an increase in drought conditions and human water usage is putting them further at risk by depleting water resources. Two paths are considered to combat water shortage issues and with one being to acquire new water resources and the other to conserve and recycle water. There may not be a single resolution to drought, but sustainable practices appear to be the best way to combat the negative effects of climate change induced drought in the American Southwest. Henry 3
    [Show full text]
  • IPCC AR6 WGI Faqs.Pdf
    AR6 WGI Report – List of corrigenda to be implemented The corrigenda listed below will be implemented in the FAQs during copy-editing. FAQs Document Section Page :Line Detailed info on correction to make (Chapter, (based on Annex, Supp. the final Mat…) pdf FGD version) 3 FAQ3.2 103:4 & Replace “CESM1 large ensemble” with “MPI-ESM grand ensemble”. 201:10 3 FAQ3.2 201:2 (Figure The image should be replaced to 1) The new figure was uploaded to the Figure Manager. 8 FAQ 8.1 227 :1 Replace “land use changes effect ” by “land use changes affect ” 9 FAQ9.1, 131 :9 Change ‘Table 9.SM.5’ to ‘Table 9.SM.9’. Figure 1 and 255 :6 9 FAQ 9.1 132 : 9 Remove “Table 9.SM.5” 11 FAQ 11.1 117:41 Replace “changes to on be only” with “changes over the globe by only” 11 FAQ 11.1, 343: Replace “refer” with “refers” Figure 1: 11 FAQ 11.1, 343: Replace “largest daily rainfall in a year” with “largest daily precipitation in a Figure 1: year” 11 FAQ 11.1, 343: Replace “CMIP6 ensemble mean” with “CMIP6 ensemble median” Figure 1: Final Government Distribution Chapter 1 IPCC AR6 WGI 1 Frequently Asked Questions 2 3 4 FAQ 1.1: Do we understand climate change better now compared to when the IPCC started? 5 Yes, much better. The first IPCC report, released in 1990, concluded that human-caused climate change 6 would soon become evident, but could not yet confirm that it was already happening. Today, evidence is 7 overwhelming that the climate has indeed changed since the pre-industrial era and that human activities are 8 the principal cause of that change.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change, Addiction, and Spiritual Liberation
    religions Article Climate Change, Addiction, and Spiritual Liberation Margaret Bullitt-Jonas 1,2,3 1 Missioner for Creation Care, Episcopal Diocese of Western Massachusetts, Springfield, MA 01103, USA; [email protected] 2 Missioner for Creation Care, Southern New England Conference, United Church of Christ, Framingham, MA 01702, USA 3 Creation Care Advisor, Episcopal Diocese of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02111, USA Abstract: Climate scientists have sounded the alarm: The only way to preserve a planet that is generally habitable for human beings is to carry out a transformation of society at a rate and scale that are historically unprecedented. Can we do this? Will we do this? Drawing on her long-term recovery from addiction and on her decades of ministry as a climate activist, the author reflects on how understanding the dynamics of addiction and recovery might inform our efforts to protect the web of life and to bear witness to the liberating God of love who makes all things new. Keywords: addiction; recovery; Twelve-Step Program; climate change 1. An Addict’s World The addict looks away. The addict sees but does not see. She does not want to see. There is nothing to see here. Change the subject. Citation: Bullitt-Jonas, Margaret. The addict is empty. She does not have enough. She must be filled. She must be 2021. Climate Change, Addiction, filled right now. and Spiritual Liberation. Religions 12: The addict carries out repetitive, compulsive rituals that disconnect her from self, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ others, Earth, and the sacred. rel12090709 The addict functions like a machine.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Powell Megadrought: Image Simulation
    Middle States Geographer; 2018, 51:11-20 LAKE POWELL MEGADROUGHT: IMAGE SIMULATION P. R. Baumann Department of Geography State University of New York, College at Oneonta Oneonta, NY 13820 ABSTRACT: Southwestern United States is experiencing a megadrought that started in 1999 and is now entering its third decade. This megadrought is centered on the Colorado River Basin, an area that has dealt with drought conditions for at least 2000 years. Throughout this basin numerous reservoirs have been developed to control and manage water distribution throughout the Southwest. A key reservoir in this distribution system is Lake Powell through which water from mountain snowpacks in the Upper Basin flow into the arid and heavily populated Lower Basin. This paper shows how the current megadrought has reduced the water level in the lower portion of Lake Powell. Between 1999 and 2004 the water level in the reservoir decreased at a significant rate mainly due to low snowfalls in the surrounding mountains. By 2009 the water level had reached a low stage. The reservoir’s water level has remained at this stage and it has shown no sign of recovering to the height where the reservoir would again be near full capacity. This paper also provides a simulation of what the water level might be if another major decrease occurs similar to one that existed between 1999 and 2004. The simulation illustrates the fragility of this water system to meet the needs of the Southwest. Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) data for 1999, 2004, and 2009 were used in this study in conjunction with an image processing package.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduction in Carbon Uptake During Turn of the Century Drought in Western North America
    LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: XX MONTH XXXX | DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1529 Reduction in carbon uptake during turn of the century drought in western North America Christopher R. Schwalm1*, Christopher A. Williams2, Kevin Schaefer3, Dennis Baldocchi4,5, T. Andrew Black6, Allen H. Goldstein4,7, Beverly E. Law8, Walter C. Oechel9,10, Kyaw Tha Paw U12 and Russel L. Scott12 1 Fossil fuel emissions aside, temperate North America is evident in highly managed croplands. Crop productivity in 2,383 39 1–3 9 −1 2 a net sink of carbon dioxide at present . Year-to-year counties of the western United States declined 5% or 29 Tg C yr 40 −1 3 variations in this carbon sink are linked to variations in (from 551 to 521 Tg C yr ) during the turn of the century drought, 41 3,4 4 hydroclimate that affect net ecosystem productivity . The with the largest reduction in 2002 (Fig.2). 42 5 severity and incidence of climatic extremes, including drought, Consistent with these large-scale patterns, carbon uptake was 43 5–8 6 have increased as a result of climate warming . Here, we suppressed at 10 of 15 eddy-covariance flux tower sites from 44 7 examine the effect of the turn of the century drought in the global FLUXNET network (Supplementary Table S1). Despite 45 8 western North America on carbon uptake in the region, using differences in ecosystem types, edaphic and climatic conditions, 46 10 9 reanalysis data, remote sensing observations and data from temporal extent of flux tower records, disturbance impacts 47 11 10 global monitoring networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Albedo Reduction and Drought Effects in the Extratropical Andes, 1986–2020
    Journal of Glaciology Glacier albedo reduction and drought effects in the extratropical Andes, 1986–2020 Thomas E. Shaw1,2 , Genesis Ulloa3, David Farías-Barahona4, 3 3,5 2,6 Article Rodrigo Fernandez , Jose M. Lattus and James McPhee 1 2 Cite this article: Shaw TE, Ulloa G, Farías- Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (WSL), Birmensdorf, Switzerland; Advanced Barahona D, Fernandez R, Lattus JM, McPhee J Mining Technology Center, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; 3Department of Geology, Universidad de Chile, (2021). Glacier albedo reduction and drought Santiago, Chile; 4Institute für Geographie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; effects in the extratropical Andes, 1986–2020. 5SRGIS: Geología y Geomática Ltda, Santiago, Chile and 6Department of Civil Engineering, Universidad de Chile, – Journal of Glaciology 67(261), 158 169. https:// Santiago, Chile doi.org/10.1017/jog.2020.102 Received: 10 August 2020 Abstract Revised: 10 November 2020 Surface albedo typically dominates the mass balance of mountain glaciers, though long-term Accepted: 11 November 2020 First published online: 17 December 2020 trends and patterns of glacier albedo are seldom explored. We calculated broadband shortwave albedo for glaciers in the central Chilean Andes (33–34°S) using end-of-summer Landsat scenes Key words: between 1986 and 2020. We found a high inter-annual variability of glacier-wide albedo that is Albedo; Andes; climate; drought; glacier; largely a function of the glacier fractional snow-covered area and the total precipitation of the remote sensing preceding hydrological year (up to 69% of the inter-annual variance explained). Under the Author for correspondence: 2010–2020 ‘Mega Drought’ period, the mean albedo, regionally averaged ranging from ∼0.25– Thomas E.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Aridification of North America Jonathan T
    COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Climate change and the aridification of North America Jonathan T. Overpecka,b,1 and Bradley Udallb,c Discussions of droughts and their impacts often center human activities, most notably the burning of fossil fuels on the lack of precipitation, just as assessments of (1–5). Warmer summers are also likely to reduce flows in hydrologic impacts under a changing climate most the Columbia River, as well as in rivers along the Sierra often focus on how average precipitation in a given Nevada in California (6). Now, an important study (7) locale is likely to change in the future. Within climate documents how warming is also causing flow declines science, however, focus has begun to include the in the northern Rocky Mountains and in the largest river growing role warming temperatures are playing as a basin in the United States, the Missouri. This work further potent driver of greater aridity: hotter climate ex- highlights the mechanisms behind the temperature- tremes; drier soil conditions; more severe drought; driven river flow declines and places more focus on and the impacts of hydrologic stress on rivers, forests, how anthropogenic climate warming is progressively in- agriculture, and other systems. This shift in the hydro- creasing the risk of hot drought and more arid conditions logic paradigm is most clear in the American Southwest, across an expanding swath of the United States. where declining flows in the region’stwomostimportant The work by Martin et al. (7) on the temperature- rivers, the Colorado (Fig. 1) and Rio Grande, have been driven flow reductions in the Upper Missouri River has attributed in part to increasing temperatures caused by broader implications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Idea for Groundwater Resource Management During Megadrought Events
    Delft University of Technology A Novel Idea for Groundwater Resource Management during Megadrought Events Mianabadi, Ameneh; Derakhshan, Hashem; Davary, Kamran; Hasheminia, Seyed Majid; Hrachowitz, Markus DOI 10.1007/s11269-020-02525-4 Publication date 2020 Document Version Final published version Published in Water Resources Management Citation (APA) Mianabadi, A., Derakhshan, H., Davary, K., Hasheminia, S. M., & Hrachowitz, M. (2020). A Novel Idea for Groundwater Resource Management during Megadrought Events. Water Resources Management, 34(5), 1743-1755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02525-4 Important note To cite this publication, please use the final published version (if applicable). Please check the document version above. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons. Takedown policy Please contact us and provide details if you believe this document breaches copyrights. We will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This work is downloaded from Delft University of Technology. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to a maximum of 10. Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository 'You share, we take care!' - Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
    [Show full text]