DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States National Climate Assessment Regional Technical Input Report Series Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment Edited by: Gregg Garfin Angela Jardine Robert Merideth Mary Black Sarah LeRoy Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment © 2013 Institute of the Environment All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Reproduction of this report by electronic means for personal and noncommercial purposes is permitted as long as proper acknowledgement is included. Users are restricted from photocopying or mechanical reproduction as well as creating derivative works for commercial purposes without the prior written permission of the publisher. ISLAND PRESS is a trademark of the Center for Resource Economics. Printed on recycled, acid-free paper Manufactured in the United States of America Citation: Garfin, G., A. Jardine, R. Merideth, M. Black, and S. LeRoy, eds. 2013.Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States: A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment. A report by the Southwest Climate Alliance. Washington, DC: Island Press. Keywords: Adaptation, agriculture, air quality, assessment, atmospheric river, biodiversity, climate change, climate impacts, climate modeling, climate variability, coastal, Colorado River, decision making, drought, electric power generation, extreme events, flooding, forest mortality, Great Basin, heat related illness, heat wave, land-use change, mitigation, Native American tribes, natural resource management, ocean acidification, phenology, public health, ranching, Rio Grande, Sacramento-San Joaquin, sea-level rise, social vulnerability, Southwest, stationarity, uncertainty, urban metabolism, U.S.Mexico border, vector-borne disease, water resources, wildfire This technical input document in its current form does not represent a Federal document of any kind and should not be interpreted as the position or policy of any Federal, State, Local, or Tribal Government or Non-governmental entity. Front Cover Images: Eagle Dancers courtesy of the New Mexico Tourism Department. All other images courtesy of iStock. About This Series This report is published as one of a series of technical inputs to the National Climate Assessment (NCA) 2013 report. The NCA is being conducted under the auspices of the Global Change Research Act of 1990, which requires a report to the President and Con- gress every four years on the status of climate change science and impacts. The NCA in- forms the nation about already observed changes, the current status of the climate, and anticipated trends for the future. The NCA report process integrates scientific informa- tion from multiple sources and sectors to highlight key findings and significant gaps in our knowledge. Findings from the NCA provide input to federal science priorities and are used by U.S. citizens, communities and businesses as they create more sustainable and environmentally sound plans for the nation’s future. In fall of 2011, the NCA requested technical input from a broad range of experts in academia, private industry, state and local governments, non-governmental organiza- tions, professional societies, and impacted communities, with the intent of producing a better informed and more useful report in 2013. In particular, the eight NCA regions, as well as the Coastal and the Ocean biogeographical regions, were asked to contribute technical input reports highlighting past climate trends, projected climate change, and impacts to specific sectors in their regions. Each region established its own process for developing this technical input. The lead authors for related chapters in the 2013 NCA report, which will include a much shorter synthesis of climate change for each region, are using these technical input reports as important source material. By publishing this series of regional technical input reports, Island Press hopes to make this rich collection of information more widely available. This series includes the following reports: Climate Change and Pacific Islands: Indicators and Impacts Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities Great Plains Regional Technical Input Report Climate Change in the Midwest: A Synthesis Report for the National Climate Assessment Climate Change in the Northeast: A Sourcebook Climate Change in the Northwest: Implications for Our Landscapes, Waters, and Communities Oceans and Marine Resources in a Changing Climate Climate of the Southeast United States: Variability, Change, Impacts, and Vulnerability Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States Electronic copies of all reports can be accessed on the Climate Adaptation Knowledge Exchange (CAKE) website at www.cakex.org/NCAreports. Printed copies are available for sale on the Island Press website at www.islandpress.org/NCAreports. Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States A Report Prepared for the National Climate Assessment EXECUTIVE EDITOR Gregg Garfin (University of Arizona) ASSOCIATE EDITOR Angela Jardine (University of Arizona) CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Robert Merideth (University of Arizona) Mary Black (University of Arizona) Sarah LeRoy (University of Arizona) Washington | Covelo | London Acknowledgements The authors thank the members of the Southwest Climate Alliance Executive Commit- tee, who developed the original Expression of Interest for this technical report. Mem- bers included: David Busch (USGS), Dan Cayan (Scripps Institution of Oceanography/ UCSD), Michael Dettinger (USGS), Erica Fleishman (University of California, Davis), Gregg Garfin (University of Arizona), Alexander Sasha Gershunov (Scripps Institution of Oceanography/UCSD), Glen MacDonald (UCLA), Jonathan Overpeck (University of Arizona), Kelly Redmond (Desert Research Institute), Mark Schwartz (University of California, Davis), William Travis (University of Colorado), and Brad Udall (Uni- versity of Colorado). We acknowledge the contributions of the three NOAA Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) projects in the region, and their program managers, through the generous donation of staff time and assessment advice: California- Nevada Applications Program (CNAP; Dan Cayan), Climate Assessment for the South- west (CLIMAS; Dan Ferguson), and Western Water Assessment (WWA; Brad Udall). We also acknowledge the contributions of the Southwest Climate Science Center (SWCSC). The NOAA Climate Program Office and the USGS provided funding and development support. For guidance and input in writing this report, we thank the National Climate Assess- ment staff: Emily Cloyd, Katharine Jacobs, Fred Lipschultz, Sheila O’Brien, and Anne Waple. We thank the National Climate Assessment Development and Advisory Com- mittee for guidance and input in writing this report. This includes the following people: Jim Buizer (University of Arizona), Guido Franco (California Energy Commission), Nan- cy Grimm (Arizona State University), Diana Liverman (University of Arizona), Susanne Moser (Susanne Moser Research and Consulting, Stanford University), Richard Moss (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory), and Gary Yohe (Wesleyan University). The authors are grateful to Jaimie Galayda (University of Arizona) for exceptional assistance in organizing the August 2011 prospective authors’ workshop. Eric Gordon (University of Colorado), Sarah Guthrie (CIRES), William Travis (University of Colo- rado), and Suzanne van Drunick (CIRES) hosted the 2011 workshop, providing rooms, technical support, and hospitality. Mary Floyd (Zantech IT Services) assisted with travel arrangements for some of the workshop participants. Tamara Wall (Desert Research In- stitute) also provided assistance. Jennifer Paolini (Scripps Institution of Oceanography) provided exceptional logistical support and hospitality for our August workshop and our January 2012 Coordinating Lead Authors’ workshop. Lesa Langan DuBerry (Uni- versity of Arizona) and Anh Le (University of Arizona) provided logistical support for both workshops. The Assessment of Climate Change in the Southwest United States was developed with the benefit of a scientifically rigorous first draft expert review and we thank the review editors and expert reviewers. We also thank everyone who contributed in the public review, as well as the decision makers, resource managers, citizens, and experts who provided feedback on the content of the report, in addition to valuable insights about the form of the report and ancillary materials. ix x ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN THE SOUTHWEST UNITED STATES We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Working Group on Coupled Modeling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. The GCM projections from the CMIP3 dataset are part of the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP’s) Coupled Model Intercom- parison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) multi-model dataset. Bias Corrected and Downscaled (BCSD) and VIC hydrological model projections were obtained from the http://gdo-dcp. ucllnl.org/downscaled_cmip3_projections/ archive provided by the U.S. Bureau of Rec- lamation and partners (see Reclamation, 2011, “West-Wide Climate Risk Assessments: Bias-Corrected and Spatially Downscaled Surface Water Projections,” Technical Memo-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Arkstorm Scenario: California's Other "Big One"
    The San Bernardino County Museum Guest Lecture Series The ARkStorm Scenario: California’s other “Big One” Lucy Jones • U. S. Geological Survey Wednesday, January 25, 2012 • 7:30pm • Free Admission Landslides and debris flows. Coastal innundation and flooding. Infrastructure damage. Pollution. Dr. Lucy Jones will give an overview of the ARkStorm Scenario—catastrophic flooding resulting from a month-long deluge like was seen in 1862, and four larger such events in the past 100 years. This type of storm, resulting from atmospheric rivers of moisture, is plausible, and a smaller version hit San Bernardino in December of 2010 with a week’s worth of rain that impacted Highland and the surrounding communities. The ARkStorm Scenario explores the resulting impacts to our social structure and can be used to understand how California’s “other” Big One can be more expensive than a large San Andreas earthquake. Dr. Lucy Jones has been a seismologist with the US Geological Survey and a Visiting Research Associate at the Seismological Laboratory of Caltech since 1983. She currently serves as the Science Advisor for the Natural Hazards Mission of the US Geological Survey, leading the long-term science planning for natural hazards research. She also leads the SAFRR Project: Science Application for Risk Reduction to apply USGS science to reduce risk in communities across the nation. Dr. Jones has written more than 90 papers on research seismology with primary interest in the physics of earthquakes, foreshocks, and earthquake hazard assessment, especially in southern California. She serves on the California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council and was a Commissioner of the California Seismic Safety Commission from 2002 to 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Notropis Girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis Tetranema)
    Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Species Status Assessment Report for the Arkansas River Shiner (Notropis girardi) and Peppered Chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) Arkansas River shiner (bottom left) and peppered chub (top right - two fish) (Photo credit U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 Version 1.0a October 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Albuquerque, NM This document was prepared by Angela Anders, Jennifer Smith-Castro, Peter Burck (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) – Southwest Regional Office) Robert Allen, Debra Bills, Omar Bocanegra, Sean Edwards, Valerie Morgan (USFWS –Arlington, Texas Field Office), Ken Collins, Patricia Echo-Hawk, Daniel Fenner, Jonathan Fisher, Laurence Levesque, Jonna Polk (USFWS – Oklahoma Field Office), Stephen Davenport (USFWS – New Mexico Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office), Mark Horner, Susan Millsap (USFWS – New Mexico Field Office), Jonathan JaKa (USFWS – Headquarters), Jason Luginbill, and Vernon Tabor (Kansas Field Office). Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for the Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema), version 1.0, with appendices. October 2018. Albuquerque, NM. 172 pp. Arkansas River Shiner and Peppered Chub SSA, October 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 INTRODUCTION (CHAPTER 1) The Arkansas River shiner (Notropis girardi) and peppered chub (Macrhybopsis tetranema) are restricted primarily to the contiguous river segments of the South Canadian River basin spanning eastern New Mexico downstream to eastern Oklahoma (although the peppered chub is less widespread). Both species have experienced substantial declines in distribution and abundance due to habitat destruction and modification from stream dewatering or depletion from diversion of surface water and groundwater pumping, construction of impoundments, and water quality degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Proxy Voting Guidelines Benchmark Policy Recommendations TITLE
    UNITED STATES Proxy Voting Guidelines Benchmark Policy Recommendations TITLE Effective for Meetings on or after February 1, 2021 Published November 19, 2020 ISS GOVERNANCE .COM © 2020 | Institutional Shareholder Services and/or its affiliates UNITED STATES PROXY VOTING GUIDELINES TABLE OF CONTENTS Coverage ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Board of Directors ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Voting on Director Nominees in Uncontested Elections ........................................................................................... 8 Independence ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 ISS Classification of Directors – U.S. ................................................................................................................. 9 Composition ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Responsiveness ................................................................................................................................................... 12 Accountability ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Changes in the Great Basin Gail Wells Gail Wells Communications
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln JFSP Fire Science Digests U.S. Joint Fire Science Program 2008 Big Changes in the Great Basin Gail Wells Gail Wells Communications Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspdigest Part of the Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, and the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Wells, Gail, "Big Changes in the Great Basin" (2008). JFSP Fire Science Digests. 3. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/jfspdigest/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Joint Fire Science Program at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in JFSP Fire Science Digests by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. FIRE SCIENCE DIGEST ISSUE 3 JUNE 2008 ISSUE 3 JUNE 2008 Big Changes in the Great Basin JFSP-funded researchers are exploring the ecological functioning of sagebrush-steppe communities in the Great Basin and other places in the dry Intermountain West. Their work is helping managers effectively use tools such as tree mastication and prescribed fire to help these communities become more resilient in the face of invasive weeds. Other research is finding ways to reestablish native vegetation on sites where weedy invaders have pushed the community past the point where it can recover on its own. FIRE SCIENCE DIGEST ISSUE 3 JUNE 2008 When it comes to endangered ecosystems, the Last summer’s Murphy Complex fire in Idaho and arid Intermountain West has more than its share.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City
    LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Waterbody/Assessment Unit (AU): Lower Arkansas River – Derby to Ark City Water Quality Impairment: Chloride 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Ark River (Derby), Ark River (Oxford), Ark River (Ark City), South Fork Ninnescah River, Ninnescah River, Slate Creek, Unmonitored Basin County: Cowley, Sumner, Sedgwick, Kingman, Pratt, Kiowa HUC 8: 11030013, 11030015, 11030016, 11060001 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): 11030013020(050) 11030013030(010, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070, 080, 090) 11030015030(010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060) 11030016010(010, 020, 030, 040, 050) 11030016020(010, 020, 030) 11060001040(010) Ecoregion: Central Great Plains, Wellington-McPherson Lowland (27d) Flint Hills (28) Drainage Area: 1,653 square miles Main Stem Segments: 11030013 (AU Station 528): Slate Cr (17) (AU Station 281): Arkansas R (3-part) (AU Station 527): Arkansas R (2-part, 3-part, 18) (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (1, 2-part) 11030015 (AU Station 036): S.F. Ninnescah R (1,3,4,6) 11030016 (AU Station 280): Ninnescah R (1,3,8) 11060001 (AU Station 218): Arkansas R (14, 18) 1 Main Stem Segments with Tributaries by HUC 8 and Watershed/Station Number: Table 1 (a-f) a. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Slate Creek Station 528 Slate Cr (17) (partial) Winser Cr (32) Antelope Cr (25) Beaver Cr (29)* Hargis Cr (24)* Oak Cr (26)* Spring Cr (27)* * Not impaired b. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Derby) Station 281 Arkansas R (3 - part) Spring Cr (37) c. HUC8 11030013 Watershed Arkansas River (Oxford) Station 527 Arkansas R (2 -part) Spring Cr (34) Lost Cr (23) Arkansas R (18) Arkansas R (3 - part) Bitter Cr (28) Dog Cr (531) d.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative
    September 2010 The Great Basin Landscape Conservation Cooperative What is a Landscape Conservation The Great Basin Landscape Cooperative? Conservation Cooperative Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCCs) are applied science and management partnerships between Interior Department bureaus and others involved in natural resource management and What is the Great Basin LCC? conservation. Secretarial Order No. 3289, issued on Sept. 14, 2009 The Great Basin LCC will be a self-directed partnership. The by Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, calls for the establishment of 21 Great Basin LCC will provide a range of scientific and technical LCCs nationwide to better integrate science and management to support tools for landscape-scale conservation design to a wide address climate change and related issues array of managers. These tools will help managers identify and target biological objectives for native species and habitats in the What will the Great Basin LCC do? face of climate change and other stressors. Open public access to In broad terms, the Great Basin LCC will help link and integrate Great Basin LCC products will promote acceptance and use of Interior’s proposed Climate Science Centers with resource managers the science in regional conservation strategies. This effort is being and science users; will bring additional Interior resources to bear on coordinated with other regional partnerships and will be set up in landscape-scale issues and opportunities; and will help in applying a manner that will facilitate coordination and the identification science and facilitating coordination on a wide range of efforts of needs, capacities and gaps. We will link our efforts to bring to respond to climate change, invasive species, wildfires, human additional science capacity to improve conservation strategies development and other change agents across the Great Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Country', 'Land', 'Nation': Key Anglo English Words for Talking and Thinking About People in Places
    8 ‘Country’, ‘land’, ‘nation’: Key Anglo English words for talking and thinking about people in places Cliff Goddard Griffith University, Australia [email protected] Abstract The importance of the words ‘country’, ‘land’ and ‘nation’, and their derivatives, in Anglophone public and political discourses is obvious. Indeed, it would be no exaggeration to say that without the support of words like these, discourses of nationalism, patriotism, immigration, international affairs, land rights, and post/anti- colonialism would be literally impossible. This is a corpus-assisted, lexical-semantic study of the English words ‘country’, ‘land’ and ‘nation’, using the NSM technique of paraphrase in terms of simple, cross- translatable words (Goddard & Wierzbicka 2014). It builds on Anna Wierzbicka’s (1997) seminal study of “homeland” and related concepts in European languages, as well as more recent NSM works (e.g. Bromhead 2011, 2018; Levisen & Waters 2017) that have explored ways in which discursively powerful words encapsulate historically and culturally contingent assumptions about relationships between people and places. The primary focus is on conceptual analysis, lexical polysemy, phraseology and discursive formation in mainstream Anglo English, but the study also touches on one specifically Australian phenomenon, which is the use of ‘country’ in a distinctive sense which originated in Aboriginal English, e.g. in expressions like ‘my grandfather’s country’ and ‘looking after country’. This highlights how Anglo English words can be semantically “re-purposed” in postcolonial and anti-colonial discourses. Keywords: lexical semantics, NSM, ‘nation’ concept, Anglo English, Australian English, Aboriginal English. 1. Orientation and methodology The importance of the words country, land and nation, and their derivatives, in Anglophone public and political discourses is obvious.
    [Show full text]
  • Struggle for North America Prepare to Read
    0120_wh09MODte_ch03s3_s.fm Page 120 Monday, June 4, 2007 10:26WH09MOD_se_CH03_S03_s.fm AM Page 120 Monday, April 9, 2007 10:44 AM Step-by-Step WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO SECTION 3 Instruction 3 A Piece of the Past In 1867, a Canadian farmer of English Objectives descent was cutting logs on his property As you teach this section, keep students with his fourteen-year-old son. As they focused on the following objectives to help used their oxen to pull away a large log, a them answer the Section Focus Question piece of turf came up to reveal a round, and master core content. 3 yellow object. The elaborately engraved 3 object they found, dated 1603, was an ■ Explain why the colony of New France astrolabe that had belonged to French grew slowly. explorer Samuel de Champlain. This ■ Analyze the establishment and growth astrolabe was a piece of the story of the of the English colonies. European exploration of Canada and the A statue of Samuel de Champlain French-British rivalry that followed. ■ Understand why Europeans competed holding up an astrolabe overlooks Focus Question How did European for power in North America and how the Ottawa River in Canada (right). their struggle affected Native Ameri- Champlain’s astrolabe appears struggles for power shape the North cans. above. American continent? Struggle for North America Prepare to Read Objectives In the 1600s, France, the Netherlands, England, and Sweden Build Background Knowledge L3 • Explain why the colony of New France grew joined Spain in settling North America. North America did not Given what they know about the ancient slowly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diffusion of Maize to the Southwestern United States and Its Impact
    PERSPECTIVE The diffusion of maize to the southwestern United States and its impact William L. Merrilla, Robert J. Hardb,1, Jonathan B. Mabryc, Gayle J. Fritzd, Karen R. Adamse, John R. Roneyf, and A. C. MacWilliamsg aDepartment of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37102, Washington, DC 20013-7012; bDepartment of Anthropology, One UTSA Circle, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249; cHistoric Preservation Office, City of Tucson, P.O. Box 27210, Tucson, AZ 85726; dDepartment of Anthropology, Campus Box 1114, One Brookings Drive, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130; eCrow Canyon Archaeological Center, 23390 Road K, Cortez, CO 81321; fColinas Cultural Resource Consulting, 6100 North 4th Street, Private Mailbox #300, Albuquerque, NM 87107; and gDepartment of Archaeology, 2500 University Drive Northwest, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4 Edited by Linda S. Cordell, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, and approved October 30, 2009 (received for review June 22, 2009) Our understanding of the initial period of agriculture in the southwestern United States has been transformed by recent discoveries that establish the presence of maize there by 2100 cal. B.C. (calibrated calendrical years before the Christian era) and document the processes by which it was integrated into local foraging economies. Here we review archaeological, paleoecological, linguistic, and genetic data to evaluate the hypothesis that Proto-Uto-Aztecan (PUA) farmers migrating from a homeland in Mesoamerica intro- duced maize agriculture to the region. We conclude that this hypothesis is untenable and that the available data indicate instead a Great Basin homeland for the PUA, the breakup of this speech community into northern and southern divisions Ϸ6900 cal.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Flooding
    ATM 10 Severe and Unusual Weather Prof. Richard Grotjahn L 18/19 http://canvas.ucdavis.edu Lecture 18 topics: • Hurricanes – what is a hurricane – what conditions favor their formation? – what is the internal hurricane structure? – where do they occur? – why are they important? – when are those conditions met? – what are they called? – What are their life stages? – What does the ranking mean? – What causes the damage? Time lapse of the – (Reading) Some notorious storms 2005 Hurricane Season – How to stay safe? Note the water temperature • Video clips (colors) change behind hurricanes (black tracks) (Hurricane-2005_summer_clouds-SST.mpg) Reading: Notorious Storms • Atlantic hurricanes are referred to by name. – Why? • Notorious storms have their name ‘retired’ © AFP Notorious storms: progress and setbacks • August-September 1900 Galveston, Texas: 8,000 dead, the deadliest in U.S. history. • September 1906 Hong Kong: 10,000 dead. • September 1928 South Florida: 1,836 dead. • September 1959 Central Japan: 4,466 dead. • August 1969 Hurricane Camille, Southeast U.S.: 256 dead. • November 1970 Bangladesh: 300,000 dead. • April 1991 Bangladesh: 70,000 dead. • August 1992 Hurricane Andrew, Florida and Louisiana: 24 dead, $25 billion in damage. • October/November 1998 Hurricane Mitch, Honduras: ~20,000 dead. • August 2005 Hurricane Katrina, FL, AL, MS, LA: >1800 dead, >$133 billion in damage • May 2008 Tropical Cyclone Nargis, Burma (Myanmar): >146,000 dead. Some Notorious (Atlantic) Storms Tracks • Camille • Gilbert • Mitch • Andrew • Not shown: – 2004 season (Charley, Frances, Ivan, Jeanne) – Katrina (Wilma & Rita) (2005) – Sandy (2012), Harvey (2017), Florence & Michael (2018) Hurricane Camille • 14-19 August 1969 • Category 5 at landfall – for 24 hours – peak winds 165 kts (190mph @ landfall) – winds >155kts for 18 hrs – min SLP 905 mb (26.73”) – 143 perished along gulf coast, – another 113 in Virginia Hurricane Andrew • 23-26 August 1992 • Category 5 at landfall • first Category 5 to hit US since Camille • affected S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nineteenth-Century French Challenges to the Liberal Image of Russia
    Ezequiel Adamovsky Russia as a Space of Hope: Nineteenth-century French Challenges to the Liberal Image of Russia Introduction Beginning with Montesquieu’s De l’esprit des lois, a particular perception of Russia emerged in France. To the traditional nega- tive image of Russia as a space of brutality and backwardness, Montesquieu now added a new insight into her ‘sociological’ otherness. In De l’esprit des lois Russia was characterized as a space marked by an absence. The missing element in Russian society was the independent intermediate corps that in other parts of Europe were the guardians of freedom. Thus, Russia’s back- wardness was explained by the lack of the very element that made Western Europe’s superiority. A similar conceptual frame was to become predominant in the French liberal tradition’s perception of Russia. After the disillusion in the progressive role of enlight- ened despotism — one must remember here Voltaire and the myth of Peter the Great and Catherine II — the French liberals went back to ‘sociological’ explanations of Russia’s backward- ness. However, for later liberals such as Diderot, Volney, Mably, Levesque or Louis-Philippe de Ségur the missing element was not so much the intermediate corps as the ‘third estate’.1 In the turn of liberalism from noble to bourgeois, the third estate — and later the ‘middle class’ — was thought to be the ‘yeast of freedom’ and the origin of progress and civilization. In the nineteenth century this liberal-bourgeois dichotomy of barbarian Russia (lacking a middle class) vs civilized Western Europe (the home of the middle class) became hegemonic in the mental map of French thought.2 European History Quarterly Copyright © 2003 SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Development and the Changing Economy of the West
    A Report from the ENERGY AND THE WEST Series by Energy Development and the Changing Economy of the West September 2008 Energy Development and the Changing Economy of the West Headwaters Economics Bozeman, Montana September, 2008 - revised 06/24/09 PUBLISHED ONLINE : www.headwaterseconomics.org/energy ABOUT HEADWATERS ECONOMICS Headwaters Economics is an independent, nonprofit research group. Our mission is to improve community development and land management decisions in the West. P.O. Box 7059 Bozeman, MT 59771 406-599-7423 www.headwaterseconomics.org Cover design and layout by Michael Cutter. ii ABOUT THE ENERGY AND THE WEST SERIES This report is the first in a series Energy and the West published by Headwaters Economics on the topic of energy development. This series is designed to assist the public and public officials in making informed choices about energy development that will benefit the region over the long term. In the reports in the Energy and the West series listed below, we consider the policy context for en- ergy development in the West. Our focus is the impact of energy development on states, counties, and communities, from the perspectives of economic performance (i.e., jobs, personal income, wages) and fiscal health (i.e., state and county budgets, revenues and expenses). The series also includes state and local area case studies that explore benefits and costs in greater detail. Titles in the Energy and the West series: • Energy Development and the Changing Economy of the West • U.S. Energy Needs and the Role of Western
    [Show full text]