DOCSLIB.ORG

Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2013-2023

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2013-2023 Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2013-2023 Alberta Species at Risk Recovery Plan No. 32 Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2013-2023 Prepared by: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development January 2014 ISBN: 978-1-4601-1098-0 (Online Edition) ISSN: 1702-4900 (Online Edition) Cover photos: courtesy of Mark Steinhilber, Royal Alberta Museum For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre – Publications Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 – 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Visit the Alberta Species at Risk Program web site at: http://esrd.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/species-at-risk/ This publication may be cited as: Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. 2014. Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2013-2023. Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Management Branch, Alberta Species at Risk Recovery Plan No.32, Edmonton, AB. 22 pp. ii PREFACE Albertans are fortunate to share their province with an impressive diversity of wild species. Populations of most species of plants and animals are healthy and secure. However, a small number of species are either naturally rare or are now imperiled because of human activities. Recovery plans establish a basis for cooperation among government, industry, conservation groups, landowners and other stakeholders to ensure these species and populations are restored or maintained for future generations. Alberta’s commitment to the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk and to the National Framework for the Conservation of Species at Risk, combined with requirements established under Alberta’s Wildlife Act and the federal Species at Risk Act, has resulted in the development of a provincial recovery program. The overall goal of the recovery program is to restore species identified as Threatened or Endangered to viable, naturally self-sustaining populations within Alberta. The policy document Alberta’s Strategy for the Management of Species at Risk (2009– 2014) provides broader program context for recovery activities. Alberta species at risk recovery plans are prepared under the supervision of the Species at Risk Program, Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. This often includes involvement of a recovery team composed of various stakeholders including conservation organizations, industry, landowners, resource users, universities, government agencies and others. Membership is by invitation from the Executive Director of the Fish and Wildlife Policy Branch and is uniquely tailored to each species and circumstance. Conservation and management of these species continues during preparation of recovery plans. The Executive Director of the Fish and Wildlife Policy Branch provides these plans as advice to the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. Alberta’s Endangered Species Conservation Committee also reviews draft recovery plans and provides recommendations on their acceptance to the Minister. Additional opportunities for review by the public may also be provided. Plans accepted and approved for implementation by the Minister are published as a government recovery plan. Approved plans are a summary of the Ministry’s commitment to work with involved stakeholders to coordinate and implement conservation actions necessary to restore or maintain these species. Recovery plans include three main sections: background information that highlights the species’ biology, population trends, and threats; a recovery section that outlines goals, objectives, and strategies to address the threats; and an action plan that profiles priority actions required to maintain or restore the Threatened or Endangered species. Each approved recovery plan undergoes regular review, and progress of implementation is evaluated. Implementation of each recovery plan is subject to the availability of resources from within and from outside government. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ____________________________________________________ vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________________1 1.1 Provincial and National Status _____________________________________________________ 1 1.2 Recovery Team _________________________________________________________________ 1 2.0 SPECIES BIOLOGY ________________________________________________________2 2.1 Life History ___________________________________________________________________ 2 2.2 Habitat _______________________________________________________________________ 3 2.3 Population Size, Distribution, and Trends in Alberta ____________________________________ 4 3.0 THREATS AND LIMITING FACTORS _________________________________________6 3.1 Sport, Domestic, and Commercial Fishing ____________________________________________ 6 3.2 Ecological Integrity _____________________________________________________________ 6 3.3 Land Use and Other Anthropogenic Activities ________________________________________ 7 3.4 Climate _______________________________________________________________________ 7 4.0 KNOWLEDGE GAPS AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES ____________________________8 5.0 RECENT RECOVERY AND CONSERVATION EFFORTS ________________________9 6.0 RECOVERY STRATEGY ___________________________________________________10 6.1 Biological and Technical Feasibility of Recovery _____________________________________ 10 6.2 Guiding Principles _____________________________________________________________ 10 6.3 Recovery Goal ________________________________________________________________ 11 6.4 Recovery Objectives ____________________________________________________________ 11 6.5 Strategies for Recovery _________________________________________________________ 11 7.0 ACTION PLAN ___________________________________________________________12 7.1 Population Conservation and Management __________________________________________ 12 7.2 Habitat Conservation and Management _____________________________________________ 12 7.3 Information and Outreach ________________________________________________________ 13 7.4 Research _____________________________________________________________________ 13 7.5 Resourcing ___________________________________________________________________ 14 7.6 Plan Management and Administration ______________________________________________ 14 8.0 TIMETABLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND SCHEDULE OF COSTS _____________14 9.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS _____________________________________17 10.0 PLAN EVALUATION AND AMENDMENT __________________________________17 11.0 LITERATURE CITED ___________________________________________________18 12.0 APPENDIX 1 ____________________________________________________________22 iv LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Shortjaw cisco relative abundance and catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) in Barrow Lake_ 4 Table 2. Implementation schedule for the action plan for shortjaw cisco. __________________15 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The distribution of shortjaw cisco in Alberta, based on surveys conducted between 1996 and 2005. _________________________________________________________________5 v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The original Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Plan 2006-2011 was developed in large part by Larry Rhude (retired, team lead) and Sue Cotterill (both of Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Wildlife Management Branch). Their efforts created a solid foundation for the 2013-2023 version of the Plan. The team would like to thank all former and current recovery team members and contributors and their respective organizations for the technical information and advice they provided during the preparation of the recovery plans. Special thanks to Sara Bumstead and Isabelle Girard (both formerly Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development) who were instrumental in planning, securing funding, and implementing a project to examine the feasibility of using underwater video technology to study shortjaw cisco in Barrow Lake. The Alberta Shortjaw Cisco Recovery Team would like to express its appreciation to Kelley Kissner who prepared the original draft recovery plan in collaboration with the group. This recovery plan update was developed from the original plan by Kathryn Romanchuk in consultation with Dwayne Latty and Mark Steinhilber. Funding and support for plan preparation was provided by the Species at Risk Program of Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development. Core Team Dwayne Latty (Team Lead), Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Mark Steinhilber, Royal Alberta Museum Original Consultative Team Alice Martin, Mikisew Cree First Nation Willie Courtoreille, Mikisew Cree First Nation Sony Flett, Métis Association Tim Gillies, Mikisew Sport Fishing Charlie Voyageur, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation Tim Clowater, formerly Alberta Environment and Sustainable Resource Development, Public Lands Branch vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) is a freshwater fish that occurs at relatively low densities in lakes across central Canada. In July 2003, the Minister of Environment and Sustainable Resource Development approved listing the shortjaw cisco as Threatened in Alberta. This designation was based on the species’ occurrence in only one lake in Alberta and its isolation from other populations. This species is also designated as Threatened in Canada, primarily due to the decline or extirpation of this species in the Great Lakes from commercial exploitation, climate change, predation,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sturgeon Research in NY 2017. NY Chapter, American Fisheries Society
    Citation: 2017. Brooking, Thomas E. Sturgeon Research in NY 2017. NY Chapter, American Fisheries Society. Annual Meeting Abstracts. Feb. 1-3, 2017. Buffalo, NY. 45 pp. Thursday February 2, 2017 Keynote Speakers 8:35 AM-9:20 AM Title: Lake Sturgeon recovery: Optimism for long-term success Author: Ron Bruch Affiliation: Fisheries Chief (retired), Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources Contact: [email protected] Abstract: Biologists who have worked with Lake Sturgeon are all aware of the devastating declines in abundance and habitat the species experienced in the Great Lakes and elsewhere throughout its range in North America in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Yet today in the early part of the 21st Century Lake Sturgeon populations overall enjoy much greater protection from over-exploitation, and have greater opportunities for recovery and sustainability throughout their range than they have experienced since the early 19th Century. A combination of factors including: increased attention over the last 30-40 years by state and provincial governments to effectively manage harvest and conduct proper assessments, increased public awareness of LS and their extreme vulnerability to overexploitation, improvements in assessment techniques, improvement in LS propagation techniques and stocking strategies, exponential expansion of population studies and research, increasing awareness and efforts to improve habitat and water quality, and the formation of the North American Sturgeon and Paddlefish and World Sturgeon Conservation Societies have all contributed to greater protection and recovery potential. While these are all positive steps that collectively should allow many LS populations to continue or start down the road to recovery, there are still waters and populations that may not be getting the attention needed to allow their recovery to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coregonus Zenithicus) in Lake Superior
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 147–154 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 26 February 2004 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2004 Status of the shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Lake Superior Michael H. Hoff1 & Thomas N. Todd2* 1) U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 2800 Lake Shore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; present address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fisheries Division, Federal Building, 1 Federal Drive, Ft. Snelling, Minnesota 55111, USA. 2) U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA (*corresponding author) Received 26 Aug. 2002, revised version received 7 Mar. 2003, accepted 9 Sep. 2003 Hoff, M. H. & Todd, T. N. 2004: Status of the shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Lake Supe- rior. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 147–154. The shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) was historically found in Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior, but has been extirpated in Lakes Huron and Michigan appar- ently as the result of commercial overharvest. During 1999–2001, we conducted an assessment of shortjaw cisco abundance in fi ve areas, spanning the U.S. waters of Lake Superior, and compared our results with the abundance measured at those areas in 1921–1922. The shortjaw cisco was found at four of the fi ve areas sampled, but abundances were so low that they were not signifi cantly different from zero. In the four areas where shortjaw ciscoes were found, abundance declined signifi cantly by 99% from the 1920s to the present. To increase populations of this once economically and ecologically important species in Lake Superior, an interagency rehabilitation effort is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • COSSARO Candidate V, T, E Species Evaluation Form
    Ontario Species at Risk Evaluation Report for Shortnose Cisco (Coregonus reighardi) Committee on the Status of Species at Risk in Ontario (COSSARO) Assessed by COSSARO as Endangered November 2017 Final Cisco à museau court (Coregonus reighardi) Le cisco à museau court (Coregonus reighardi) est un Corégonidé nord-américain, et l’une des 10 espèces de ciscos du Canada. Historiquement, on trouvait cette espèce vivant en eaux profondes (de 22 à 110 mètres; Eshenroder et coll., 2016) dans le lac Huron, le lac Michigan et le lac Ontario. Cependant, on en sait très peu sur son historique et ses besoins en matière d’habitat. On croit que le déclin historique du cisco à museau court est attribuable à la surpêche, ainsi qu’à la compétition et à la prédation d’espèces de poissons non indigènes, qui sont des causes plus récentes (COSEPAC, 2017). La désignation de son statut se complique encore davantage en raison de la possibilité d’hybridation avec différentes espèces de ciscos des Grands Lacs, où certains poissons qui ne peuvent être associés à aucune espèce de ciscos pourraient toujours présenter des traits du cisco à museau court (Eshenroder et coll., 2016). Malgré l’échantillonnage intensif et ciblé, la dernière capture recensée d’un cisco à museau court clairement identifié a eu lieu en 1985 (baie Georgienne, lac Huron; COSEPAC, 2017). L’espèce est probablement disparue, mais comme seulement 32 ans se sont écoulés depuis la dernière capture, elle ne peut être classée dans cette catégorie. Le cisco à museau court est considéré comme étant en voie de disparition en Ontario en raison de sa faible population (< 250 individus).
    [Show full text]
  • Field Key to the Freshwater Fishes of British Columbia
    FIELD KEY TO THE FRESHWATER FISHES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA J.D. McPhail and R. Carveth Fish Museum, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 (604) 822-4803 Fax (604) 822-2416 © The Province of British Columbia Published by the Resources Inventory Committee Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data McPhail, J. D. (John Donald) Field key to the freshwater, fishes of British Columbia Also available through the Internet. Previously issued: Field key to the freshwater fishes of British Columbia. Draft for 1994 field testing, 1994. Includes bibliographical references: p. ISBN 0-7726-3830-6 (Field guide) ISBN 0-7726-3844-6 (Computer file) 1. Freshwater fishes - British Columbia - Identification. I. Carveth, R. II. Resources Inventory Committee (Canada) III. Title. QL626.5.B7M36 1999 597.176'09711 C99-960109-1 Additional Copies of this publication can be purchased from: Government Publications Centre Phone: (250) 387-3309 or Toll free: 1 -800-663-6105 Fax: (250) 387-0388 www.publications.gov.bc.ca Digital Copies are available on the Internet at: http://www.for.gov. bc.ca/ric Text copyright © 1993 J.D. McPhail Illustrations copyright © 1993 D.L. McPhail All rights reserved. Design and layout by D.L. McPhail "Admitted that some degree of obscurity is inseparable from both theology and ichthyology, it is not inconsistent with profound respect for the professors of both sciences to observe that a great deal of it has been created by themselves." Sir Herbert Maxwell TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction · i Region 1 - Vancouver Island 1 Region 2 - Fraser 27 Region 3 - Columbia 63 Region 4 - MacKenzie 89 Region 5 - Yukon 115 Region 6 - North Coast 127 Region 7 - Queen Charlotte Islands 151 Region 8 - Central Coast 167 Appendix 193 Acknowledgements .
    [Show full text]
  • Coregonus Nigripinnis) in Northern Algonquin Provincial Park
    HABITAT PREFERENCES AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF BLACKFIN CISCO (COREGONUS NIGRIPINNIS) IN NORTHERN ALGONQUIN PROVINCIAL PARK A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Arts and Science Trent University Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Allan Henry Miller Bell 2017 Environmental and Life Sciences M.Sc. Graduate Program September 2017 ABSTRACT Depth Distribution and Feeding Structure Differentiation of Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis) In Northern Algonquin Provincial Park Allan Henry Miller Bell Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis), a deepwater cisco species once endemic to the Laurentian Great Lakes, was discovered in Algonquin Provincial Park in four lakes situated within a drainage outflow of glacial Lake Algonquin. Blackfin habitat preference was examined by analyzing which covariates best described their depth distribution using hurdle models in a multi-model approach. Although depth best described their distribution, the nearly isothermal hypolimnion in which Blackfin reside indicated a preference for cold-water habitat. Feeding structure differentiation separated Blackfin from other coregonines, with Blackfin possessing the most numerous (50-66) gill rakers, and, via allometric regression, the longest gill rakers and lower gill arches. Selection for feeding efficiency may be a result of Mysis diluviana affecting planktonic size structure in lakes containing Blackfin Cisco, an effect also discovered in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). This thesis provides insight into the habitat preferences and feeding ecology of Blackfin and provides a basis for future study. Keywords: Blackfin Cisco, Lake Whitefish, coregonine, Mysis, habitat, feeding ecology, hurdle models, allometric regression, Algonquin Provincial Park ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alberta a Re-Examination of the Nominal
    University of Alberta A Re-examination of the Nominal Shortjaw Cisco (Coregonus zenifhicus) in Barrow Lake, Aiberta and Taxonornic Evaluation of Neighbo~gCisco Populations Mark Steinhilber O A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systematics and Evolution Department of Biological Sciences Edmonton, Alberta Fa112000 National Library Bibliothèque nationale lei ,.a",, du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON KIA ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada Your file Vowe r6lëmw Our fiie Ncrre réUrence The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies ofthis thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/nlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fÎom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author' s ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. Abstract The morphology, ecology, and genetics of the putative Coregonus zenithicus (shortjaw cisco) in Barrow Lake, Alberta were exarnined to venfy the distinctiveness and specific identity of this population.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus Arcticus) in Alberta
    Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta: Update 2015 Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 57 (Update 2015) Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta: Update 2015 Prepared for: Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) Alberta Conservation Association (ACA) Update prepared by: Christopher L. Cahill Much of the original work contained in the report was prepared by Jordan Walker in 2005. This report has been reviewed, revised, and edited prior to publication. It is an AEP/ACA working document that will be revised and updated periodically. Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 57 (Update 2015) December 2015 Published By: i i ISBN No. 978-1-4601-3452-8 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1499-4682 (On-line Edition) Series Editors: Sue Peters and Robin Gutsell Cover illustration: Brian Huffman For copies of this report, visit our web site at: http://aep.alberta.ca/fish-wildlife/species-at-risk/ (click on “Species at Risk Publications & Web Resources”), or http://www.ab-conservation.com/programs/wildlife/projects/alberta-wildlife-status-reports/ (click on “View Alberta Wildlife Status Reports List”) OR Contact: Alberta Government Library 11th Floor, Capital Boulevard Building 10044-108 Street Edmonton AB T5J 5E6 http://www.servicealberta.gov.ab.ca/Library.cfm [email protected] 780-427-2985 This publication may be cited as: Alberta Environment and Parks and Alberta Conservation Association. 2015. Status of the Arctic Grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in Alberta: Update 2015. Alberta Environment and Parks. Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 57 (Update 2015). Edmonton, AB. 96 pp. ii PREFACE Every five years, Alberta Environment and Parks reviews the general status of wildlife species in Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus Artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes
    Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes General In the Great Lakes Basin, a number of tools are available to manage Cisco stocks including restoration when populations are depleted. Active tools that have Been used include harvest regulations, habitat protection and enhancement, and population enhancement and re-introduction via stocking. Cisco management in each lake is the purview of individual jurisdictions. Regulation of commercial and recreational fisheries in the Great Lakes is under the authority of eight individual U. S. states, the Canadian province of Ontario (Fig.1), and triBal governments. In the United States Great Lakes, three intertribal organizations regulate treaty-based harvest on ceded lands and water beyond the reservations: the Great Lakes Indian Fish and Wildlife Commission, the Chippewa Ottawa Resource Authority and the 1854 Treaty Authority (CORA 2000, Kappen et al 2012). Four treaties reserve triBal fishing rights including suBsistence fishery in Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota. In the Canadian Great Lakes, the Aboriginal Communal Fishing Licences Regulations provides communal fishing licenses as a management tool for Aboriginal fisheries, which are found on all lakes except Lake Erie. This fact sheet summarizes cisco management for each lake excluding harvest regulations for tribal fisheries which are not aligned with one lake (Fig. 2). Figure 1. Great Lakes bordering states (GLIN.net) 1 Integrated Assessment Cisco (Coregonus artedi) Restoration in Lake Michigan FACT SHEET: Management/Restoration Efforts in the Great Lakes Figure 2 .Treaty-ceded waters in the Great Lakes with tribal fishing rights reaffirmed based on 1836, 1842, and 1854 treaties between Native American tribes and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans of the Great Lakes Basin
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267883780 Ichthyofauna of the Great Lakes Basin Conference Paper · September 2011 CITATIONS READS 0 26 5 authors, including: Brian M. Roth Nicholas Mandrak Michigan State University University of Toronto 33 PUBLICATIONS 389 CITATIONS 173 PUBLICATIONS 2,427 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Greg G Sass Thomas Hrabik Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources University of Minnesota Duluth 95 PUBLICATIONS 796 CITATIONS 68 PUBLICATIONS 1,510 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Ecological Grass Carp Risk Assessment for the Great Lakes Basin View project All content following this page was uploaded by Greg G Sass on 14 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Fishes and Decapod Crustaceans of the Great Lakes Basin Brian M. Roth, Nicholas E. Mandrak, Th omas R. Hrabik, Greg G. Sass, and Jody Peters The primary goal of the first edition of this chapter (Coon 1994) was to provide an overview of the Laurentian Great Lakes fish community and its origins. For this edition, we have taken a slightly diff erent approach. Although we have updated the checklist of fishes in each of the Great Lakes and their watersheds, we also include a checklist of decapod crustaceans. Our decision to include decapods derives from the lack of such a list for the Great Lakes in the literature and the importance of decapods (in particular, crayfishes) for the ecology and biodiversity of streams and lakes in the Great Lakes region (Lodge et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition
    Minnesota Fish Taxonomic Key 2017 Edition Pictures from – NANFA (2017) Warren Lamb Aquatic Biology Program Bemidji State University Bemidji, MN 56601 Introduction Minnesota’s landscape is maze of lakes and river that are home to a recorded total of 163 species of fish. This document is a complete and current dichotomous taxonomic key of the Minnesota fishes. This key was based on the 1972 “Northern Fishes” key (Eddy 1972), and updated based on Dr. Jay Hatch’s article “Minnesota Fishes: Just How Many Are There?” (Hatch 2016). Any new species or family additions were also referenced to the 7th edition of the American Fisheries society “Names of North American Fishes” (Page et al. 2013) to assess whether a fish species is currently recognized by the scientific community. Identifying characteristics for new additions were compared to those found in Page and Burr (2011). In total five species and one family have been added to the taxonomic key, while three have been removed since the last publication. Species pictures within the keys have been provide from either Bemidji State University Ichthyology Students or North American Native Fish Association (NANFA). My hope is that this document will offer an accurate and simple key so anyone can identify the fish they may encounter in Minnesota. Warren Lamb – 2017 Pictures from – NANFA (2017) References Eddy, S. and J. C. Underhill. 1974. Northern Fishes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. 414 pp. Hatch, J. 2015. Minnesota fishes: just how many are there anyway? American Currents 40:10-21. Page, L. M. and B. M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes of North America North of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends in the Lake Superior Fish Community, 20191
    Status and Trends in the Lake Superior Fish Community, 20191 Mark R. Vinson, Lori M. Evrard, Owen T. Gorman, Caroline Rosinski, Daniel L. Yule U.S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center Lake Superior Biological Station 2800 Lakeshore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806 ([email protected]) Abstract The Lake Superior fish community was sampled in 2019 with daytime bottom trawls at 76 nearshore and 35 offshore stations distributed throughout the lake. In the nearshore zone, 25,131 fish from 24 species or morphotypes were collected. The number of species collected at nearshore stations ranged from 0 to 15, with a mean of 5.6 and median of five. Nearshore mean biomass was 5.7 kg/ha which was similar to the past twenty-year average of 5.2 kg/ha and less than the 42-year period-of-record mean of 8.5 kg/ha. Lake Whitefish, Rainbow Smelt, Longnose Sucker, Bloater, lean Lake Trout, Cisco, Burbot, and siscowet Lake Trout had the highest total collected biomass. In the offshore zone, 13,145 fish from 11 species or morphotypes were collected. The number of species collected at offshore stations ranged from two to six, with a mean 3.6 and median of four. Deepwater Sculpin, Kiyi, and siscowet Lake Trout made up 99% of the total number of individuals and biomass collected in offshore waters. Mean and median offshore biomass for all species in 2019 was 7.0 kg/ha which was greater than the past eight- year average of 6.6 kg/ha. Recruitment, as measured by age-1 densities, was near the period-of-record lakewide average for Lake Whitefish (7 fish/ha) and Rainbow Smelt (137 fish/ha) and was lower than the period-of-record lakewide average for Bloater (4 fish/ha), Kiyi (1 fish/ha), and Cisco (<1 fish/ha).
    [Show full text]