RESERVE STUDY UPDATE Park Tower Condominium Association

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RESERVE STUDY UPDATE Park Tower Condominium Association Revised RESERVE STUDY UPDATE Park Tower Condominium Association Chicago, Illinois Inspected ‐ June 1, 2016 Revised ‐ July 25, 2016 This Report contains intellectual property developed by Reserve Advisors, Inc. and cannot be reproduced or distributed to those who conduct reserve studies without their written consent. © Reserve Advisors, Inc. 2016 CORPORATE OFFICE Reserve Advisors, Inc. 735 N. Water Street, Suite 175 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Reserve Study Update July 25, 2016 The Reserve Study for Park Tower Condominium Association Was submitted on ………………………………………………………….June 23, 2016 To maintain the most accurate and cost-effective replacement schedule and funding plan for your property elements, this study should be updated on or about ..........Second Quarter, 2018 …but no later than………………………………………………………….….Second Quarter, 2019 As a valued client, we are pleased to offer a future reserve study update with site visit for………$11,500 For a Reserve Study Update with Site visit as noted above. This future update fee is based on the same property components that were contained in your last Reserve Advisors’ reserve study or update. We are pleased to include property additions for an additional fee. To initiate your Reserve Study Update, please sign this authorization and fax or mail to the number below. Upon receipt of this authorization we will contact you to schedule your site visit and invoice for the Reserve Study Update Service. Sign this contract below and fax to 414-272-3663. Or mail to Reserve Advisors, Inc. 735 N. Water St., Suite 175 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Delivery options for your Reserve Study Update Report, Please check one of the following: ____ 1-Full color printed copy PLUS Electronic Report, FREE ____ 2-Full color printed copies PLUS Electronic Report, $100 For: Reserve Advisors, Inc. For Park Tower Condominium Association Name:___________________________ Signature: _______________________ Title:____________________________ Monica Mack Director of Illinois Client Services Date:_______________ [email protected] Phone:___________________________ Ref. # 91089 Agent or Manager: Timothy Patricio (800) 221-9882 Management Firm: Draper and Kramer TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. RESERVE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................1.1 2. RESERVE STUDY REPORT ....................................................................................2.1 3. RESERVE EXPENDITURES and FUNDING PLAN .............................................3.1 4. CONDITION ASSESSMENT.....................................................................................4.1 INTERNAL PROPERTY CHANGES .............................................................................4.3 Deletions ........................................................................................................................4.4 Pipes, Domestic Water, Horizontals with Renovations ...........................................4.4 Pipes, Garage Drain .................................................................................................4.4 Trash Chute and Doors ............................................................................................4.4 Additions ........................................................................................................................4.5 Roof, 2nd Floor, Sun Deck, Steel Railings ...............................................................4.5 Walls, Concrete, Mechanical Penthouse ..................................................................4.6 Windows and Doors, Lobby, North Door ................................................................4.7 Exercise Equipment .................................................................................................4.8 Exercise Room .........................................................................................................4.9 Doors and Operators, Fire ........................................................................................4.9 Significant Changes .......................................................................................................4.10 Roofs, Tower, Main and Mechanical Penthouse .....................................................4.10 Roof, 2nd Floor, Concrete .........................................................................................4.13 Roof, 2nd Floor, Sun Deck, Planters .........................................................................4.14 Roof, Pool Enclosure ...............................................................................................4.14 Walls, Curtain Wall .................................................................................................4.15 Walls, Masonry ........................................................................................................4.19 Elevator Cab Finishes, Traction, Passenger .............................................................4.21 Mall, Market ............................................................................................................4.22 Boilers, Domestic Hot Water, Residential ...............................................................4.22 Elevator, Hydraulic, Refuse .....................................................................................4.23 Heat Exchangers, Building Heating, Main ..............................................................4.24 Life Safety System ...................................................................................................4.25 Security System .......................................................................................................4.26 Plaza .........................................................................................................................4.27 Pool, Outdoor ...........................................................................................................4.29 Photographic Documentation of Select Remaining Reserve Components ....................4.30 Exterior Building Elements......................................................................................4.30 Interior Building Elements .......................................................................................4.32 Building Services Elements .....................................................................................4.33 Property Site Elements .............................................................................................4.37 Pool Elements ..........................................................................................................4.37 Garage Elements ......................................................................................................4.38 Reserve Study Update ....................................................................................................4.39 5. METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................5.1 6. DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................6.1 7. PROFESSIONAL SERVICE CONDITIONS ...........................................................7.1 8. CREDENTIALS ...........................................................................................................8.1 Reserve Advisors, Inc. 735 N. Water Street, Suite 175 Milwaukee, WI 53202 1. RESERVE STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Client: Park Tower Condominium Association (Park Tower) Location: Chicago, Illinois Reference: 91089 Property Basics: Park Tower Condominium Association is a condominium style development of 728 residential and 16 commercial units in a 54-story building. The exterior of the building comprises a curtain wall system, brick masonry and flat roofs. The building was built in 1974 and converted to condominiums in 1979. Reserve Components Identified: 113 Reserve Components. Inspection Date: June 1, 2016. We conducted previous inspections in 1992, 1994, 1996, 2007 and 2014. Funding Goal: The Funding Goal of this Reserve Study is to maintain reserves above an adequate, not excessive threshold during one or more years of significant expenditures. Our recommended Funding Plan recognizes this threshold funding year in 2037 due to restoration of the curtain wall system. The Reserve Funding Plan recommends 2046 year end accumulated reserves of approximately $6,885,000. We judge this amount of accumulated reserves in 2046 desirable or necessary, to fund the likely replacement of the remaining original electrical system components and piping after 2046. These future needs, although beyond the limit of the Cash Flow Analysis of this Reserve Study, are reflected in the amount of accumulated 2046 year end reserves. Cash Flow Method: We use the Cash Flow Method to compute the Reserve Funding Plan. This method offsets future variable Reserve Expenditures with existing and future stable levels of reserve funding. Our application of this method also considers: • current and future local costs of replacement • 1.00% annual rate of return on invested reserves (Board requested) • 3.5% future Inflation Rate for estimating Future Replacement Costs (Board requested) Sources for Local Costs of Replacement: Our proprietary database, historical costs and published sources, i.e., R.S. Means, Incorporated. Cash Status of Reserve Fund: $1,590,336 as of February 29, 2016. Recommended Reserve Funding: The Association budgeted $1,472,900 for Reserve Contributions in 20161. We recommend the Association adopt a reserve budget of $1,600,000 in 2017 and annual inflationary
Recommended publications
  • Social Media and Popular Places: the Case of Chicago Kheir Al-Kodmany†
    International Journal of High-Rise Buildings International Journal of June 2019, Vol 8, No 2, 125-136 High-Rise Buildings https://doi.org/10.21022/IJHRB.2019.8.2.125 www.ctbuh-korea.org/ijhrb/index.php Social Media and Popular Places: The Case of Chicago Kheir Al-Kodmany† Department of Urban Planning and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA Abstract This paper offers new ways to learn about popular places in the city. Using locational data from Social Media platforms platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, along with participatory field visits and combining insights from architecture and urban design literature, this study reveals popular socio-spatial clusters in the City of Chicago. Locational data of photographs were visualized by using Geographic Information Systems and helped in producing heat maps that showed the spatial distribution of posted photographs. Geo-intensity of photographs illustrated areas that are most popularly visited in the city. The study’s results indicate that the city’s skyscrapers along open spaces are major elements of image formation. Findings also elucidate that Social Media plays an important role in promoting places; and thereby, sustaining a greater interest and stream of visitors. Consequently, planners should tap into public’s digital engagement in city places to improve tourism and economy. Keywords: Social media, Iconic socio-spatial clusters, Popular places, Skyscrapers 1. Introduction 1.1. Sustainability: A Theoretical Framework The concept of sustainability continues to be of para- mount importance to our cities (Godschalk & Rouse, 2015). Planners, architects, economists, environmentalists, and politicians continue to use the term in their conver- sations and writings.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Open Space - a Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower
    ctbuh.org/papers Title: Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Author: James Goettsch, CEO and Partner, Goettsch Partners Subjects: Architectural/Design Building Case Study Landscape Architecture Sustainability/Green/Energy Urban Design Publication Date: 2015 Original Publication: Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City Paper Type: 1. Book chapter/Part chapter 2. Journal paper 3. Conference proceeding 4. Unpublished conference paper 5. Magazine article 6. Unpublished © Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat / James Goettsch Urban Open Space - A Tower in the Park and a Park in the Tower Abstract James Goettsch CEO and Partner In urban centers dominated by tall buildings, access to outdoor space is important. We will Goettsch Partners, explain how two urban office building developments provide valuable outdoor open space in Chicago, USA different ways. In Chicago, the development involves transforming an open urban scar into one of the city’s largest public landscaped areas. The development is located on a key CBD site along the Chicago River. The result is a unique 52-story structure of which enclosed ground floor space James Goettsch, FAIA is the chairman and CEO of Goettsch Partners as well as the firm’s design director, responsible for occupies <25% of site area; offering public landscaped open space. Result: A Tower in the Park. developing the firm’s design talent and leading the direction In San Francisco, a developer is building a 42-story tower that covers virtually the entire site, with and quality for the office. He brings more than 40 years of professional experience and has personally directed all phases at-grade outdoor space limited to recessed entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Champaign County
    MARKET RATE (PRIVATE) HOUSING Champaign County Recognition Level: Silver 217 Midtown 202 E Green St, Suite 4 Champaign, IL 61820 217-355-8300 www.217midtown.com Management By: The Preiss Company Recognition Level: Silver 309 Green 309 E. Green St Champaign, IL 61820 217-366-3500 www.309green.com Management By: American Campus Communities Recognition Level: Silver 75 Armory 512 S. Neil St Champaign, IL 61820 217-356-3511 www.75armory.com Management By: Next Chapter Properties MARKET RATE (PRIVATE) HOUSING Lake County Recognition Level: Gold Deer Park Crossing 21599 W. Field Ct Deer Park, IL 60010 847-438-3850 [email protected] Management By: Deer Park Crossing Realty Recognition Level: Silver Capstone Quarters 1901-1905 N. Lincoln Ave. 217-367-7368 www.capstonequarters.com Management By: Green St Realty Recognition Level: Silver Eastview Apartments 806 W. Green Street Urbana, IL 61801 217-377-1197 www.eastview-apt.com Management By: Eastview Apartments Recognition Level: Silver Kellner Rental Properties P.O. Box 3402 Champaign, IL 61826 217-621-8388 www.kellner.managebuilding.com Management By: Kellner Rental Properties (KRP) MARKET RATE (PRIVATE) HOUSING Champaign County Recognition Level: Silver Loft 54 309 E. Green St., Suite 103 Champaign, IL 61820 217-366-3500 www.lofts54.com Management By: American Campus Communities Recognition Level: Silver Marshall Apartments 1911 Trout Valley Champaign, IL 61820 217-356-1407 www.champaignmarshallapartments.com Management By: Marshall Apartments Recognition Level: Silver Parkside Apartments 1205 E Florida Ave Urbana, IL 61802 217-344-2072 Management By: Parkside Apartments Recognition Level: Silver The Pointe at UI 1601 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Technical Problems in Modern Super-Slim High-Rise Residential Buildings
    Budownictwo i Architektura 20(1) 2021, 83-116 DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.2141 Received: 09.07.2020; Revised: 19.11.2020; Accepted: 15.12.2020; Avaliable online: 09.02.2020 © 2020 Budownictwo i Architektura Orginal Article This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 Analysis of technical problems in modern super-slim high-rise residential buildings Jerzy Szołomicki1, Hanna Golasz-Szołomicka2 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego st., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland, [email protected] 0000-0002-1339-4470 2 Faculty of Architecture; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland [email protected] 0000-0002-1125-6162 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a new skyscraper typology which has developed over the recent years – super-tall and slender, needle-like residential towers. This trend appeared on the construction market along with the progress of advanced struc- tural solutions and the high demand for luxury apartments with spectacular views. Two types of constructions can be distinguished within this typology: ultra-luxury super-slim towers with the exclusivity of one or two apartments per floor (e.g. located in Manhattan, New York) and other slender high-rise towers, built in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Bangkok, and Melbourne, among others, which have multiple apartments on each floor. This paper presents a survey of selected slender high-rise buildings, where structural improvements in tall buildings developed over the recent decade are considered from the architectural and structural view.
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes to Dip in Year-On-Year Completions
    CTBUH Year in Review: Tall Trends of 2020 Tall Buildings in 2020: COVID-19 Contributes To Dip in Year-On-Year Completions Abstract In 2020, the tall building industry constructed 106 buildings of 200 meters’ height or greater, a 20 percent decline from 2019, when 133 such buildings were completed.* The decline can be partly attributed to work stoppages and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. This report provides analysis and commentary on global and regional trends underway during an eventful year. Research Project Kindly Sponsored by: Note: Please refer to Tall Buildings in Numbers—The Global Tall Building Picture: Impact of 2020 in conjunction with this Schindler paper, pages 48–49. *The study sets a minimum threshold of 200 meters’ height because of the completeness of data available on buildings of that height. Keywords: Construction, COVID-19, Development, Height, Hotel, Megatall, Mixed-Use, Office, Residential, Supertall Introduction This is the second year in a row in which Center (New York City) completed, that the the completion figure declined. In 2019, tallest building of the year was in the For many people, 2020 will be remembered the reasons for this were varied, though United States. as the year that nothing went to plan. The the change in the tall building climate in same can be said for the tall building China, with public policy statements This is also the first year since 2014 in which industry. As a global pandemic took hold in against needless production of there has not been at least one building the first quarter, numerous projects around exceedingly tall buildings, constituted a taller than 500 meters completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Meshulam, Rewc
    MARK MESHULAM, REWC President, Mark Meshulam LLC Building Envelope Consultant & Expert Witness Northbrook, IL 60062 847-878-8922 312-462-4424 fax [email protected] www.chicagowindowexpert.com www.facadeconsultants.com YEARS OF CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE: PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY 40 Mark. Meshulam is a specialist in building facades, with extensive experience EDUCATION with windows, glass, mirrors, curtainwalls, entrances, skylights, panels, Bachelor of Science, Univ. of Illinois, 1973 louvers, window films, sealants, and the implementation of a well-functioning Masters Degree, University of Illinois, 1975 building envelope. SPECIALIZED EDUCATION Meshulam has 40 years of experience in construction, consulting, contracting, Architectural Testing laboratory and field testing, forensic investigations, insurance claims and expert Testing for Architectural Applications Building Performance Institute witness work. Building Analyst Professional Meshulam is involved with litigation, claims, and disputes involving leakage in Building Envelope Professional the building envelope and failure of building components such as glass Infrared Training Center, ITC Certified breakage, leaks and sealant failure. He is also involved with the safety of Level 1 Thermographer New York State College of Ceramics architectural products, including injury from glass breakage and detachment and Fracture Analysis and Failure Prevention window falls. He has provided expertise in criminal cases where glass was a key of Glasses and Ceramics part of the evidence. PPG
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Properties Identification Report
    Section 106 Historic Properties Identification Report North Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study E. Grand Avenue to W. Hollywood Avenue Job No. P-88-004-07 MFT Section No. 07-B6151-00-PV Cook County, Illinois Prepared For: Illinois Department of Transportation Chicago Department of Transportation Prepared By: Quigg Engineering, Inc. Julia S. Bachrach Jean A. Follett Lisa Napoles Elizabeth A. Patterson Adam G. Rubin Christine Whims Matthew M. Wicklund Civiltech Engineering, Inc. Jennifer Hyman March 2021 North Lake Shore Drive Phase I Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction and Description of Undertaking .............................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 NLSD Area of Potential Effects (NLSD APE) ................................................................................... 1 2.0 Historic Resource Survey Methodologies ..................................................................................... 3 2.1 Lincoln Park and the National Register of Historic Places ............................................................ 3 2.2 Historic Properties in APE Contiguous to Lincoln Park/NLSD ....................................................... 4 3.0 Historic Context Statements ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Polling Places Nov
    City of Chicago PRELIMINARY List of ELECTION DAY Polling Places Nov. 3, 2020 General Election* (All polling place locations are subject to change.) Ward Prec ELECTION DAY Polling Place & Address ("x" indicates that the polling place is not fully accessible.) 1 1 x Yates School 1826 N Francisco Ave 1 2 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 3 x Wells Community Academy 936 N Ashland Ave 1 4 x Commercial Park 1845 W Rice St 1 5 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 6 x The Ogden Intrnl H S / Chicago 1250 W Erie St 1 7 x Haas Park 2402 N Washtenaw Ave 1 8 x Wicker Park Senior Housing 2020 W Schiller St 1 9 x The Lincoln Lodge 2040 N Milwaukee Ave 1 10 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 11 Wicker Pk Fieldhouse 1425 N Damen Ave 1 12 Ukranian Village Cultural Ctr 2247 W Chicago Ave 1 13 x Chase School 2021 N Point St 1 14 x De Diego Community Academy 1313 N Claremont Ave 1 15 x De Diego Community Academy 1313 N Claremont Ave 1 16 x Goethe School 2236 N Rockwell St 1 17 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 18 x Create Your Own Space Studio 937 N Western Ave 1 19 x Chase School 2021 N Point St 1 20 x St Sylvester 2915 W Palmer St 1 21 x LaSalle II Magnet School 1148 N Honore St 1 22 x Wright College 1645 N California Ave 1 23 x St Sylvester 2915 W Palmer St 1 24 x Erie Elementary Charter School 1405 N Washtenaw Ave 1 25 x Erie Elementary Charter School 1405 N Washtenaw Ave 1 26 x Funston School 2010 N Central Park Ave 1 27 x The Joinery 2533 W Homer St 1 28 x Windy City Field House 2367 W Logan Bv 1 29 x Bloomingdale
    [Show full text]
  • Typologies and Evaluation of Outdoor Public Spaces at Street Level of Tall Buildings in Chicago
    TYPOLOGIES AND EVALUATION OF OUTDOOR PUBLIC SPACES AT STREET LEVEL OF TALL BUILDINGS IN CHICAGO Abstract Authors Zahida Khan and Peng Du Outdoor public spaces are key to human interactions, promoting Illinois Institute of Technology public life in cities. The constant increase in world population has led Keywords to increased tall urban conditions making the study of outdoor public Public spaces, tall buildings, urban forms, rating system spaces around tall buildings very popular. This paper outlines typol- ogies for outdoor public spaces occurring at street level of tall build- ings in downtown Chicago, the birthplace of skyscrapers and an ideal case study for an American city. The study uses online data archives, Google Maps, and on-site surveys as research techniques for the analysis. The result depicts around 50% of all the tall buildings in Chicago foster public life at its street level through public spaces. The other key finding is the outline of seven typologies based on their position around the tall building. Further, a comparative analysis is conducted using one example of each typology based on three crite- ria adopted from ‘Project for Public Spaces,’ namely (1) Accessibility; (2) Design and Comfort, and (3) Users and Activities. Prometheus 04 Buildings, Cities, and Performance, II Introduction outdoor public spaces, including: (A) Accessibility, (B) Design & Comfort, (C) Users & Activities, (D) Environ- Outdoor public spaces at street level of tall buildings play mental Sustainability, and (E) Sociable. The scope of this a significant role in sustainable city development. The research is limited to the first three design criteria since rapid increase in world population and constant growth of the last two require a bigger timeframe and is addressed urbanization has led many scholars to support Koolhaas’ for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 2019-2022 Doormen Agreement.Pub
    FOR ABOMA MEMBER USE ONLY Issued November 2019 Apartment Building Owners and Managers Association of Illinois COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN APARTMENT BUILDING OWNERS AND MANAGERS ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS and SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 1 PROPERTY SERVICE DIVISION for the period DECEMBER 1, 2019 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2022 Covering Doorstaff, Receiving Room Employees and Others as defined in Article I INTRODUCTION This booklet is exclusively for the use of ABOMA Members and contains the following: • Pages 1 through 27 Full Collective Bargaining Agreement by and between ABOMA and SEIU Local 1, Property Service Division Covering Doorstaff Receiving Room Employees and Others as defined in Article I for the period of December 1, 2019 through November 30, 2022 • Page 24 Letter of Agreement – Drug and Alcohol Policies • Page 25 Letter of Agreement – Subcontracting • Page 26 and 27 Memorandum of Agreement relating to Sub contracting and sample of Contractor DSMOA SCHEDULE A Pages 1-3 (NIPF) The Buildings (Employers) identified in Schedule A of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular Employees to the SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "NIPF") in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the NIPF. SCHEDULE B Pages 1-3 (401K Pension Savings Plan) The Buildings (Employers) identified in Schedule B of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular employees to the SEIU Local 1 401(k) Savings Plan in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the 401(k) Plan. SCHEDULE C Page 1 (DSMOA NIPF) The Buildings and sub-contractors (Employers) identified in Schedule C of this Agreement shall contribute for all regular Employees to the SEIU National Industry Pension Fund (hereinafter referred to as the "NIPF") in order to provide retirement benefits for eligible Employees in accordance with the terms of the NIPF.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Buildings, New Views
    H VoL. 35y d N0. 1 e PublishedPa by ther Hydek Park H istoricalH Society istoWINTErr 2013y 2013 R te WIN Permit No. 85 No. Permit T Chicago, IL Chicago, oor V r 37 6 60 IL Chicago, AID P HS U.S. Postage U.S. 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue Park Lake S. 5529 ANDE V HP Org. Non-Profit Society Historical Park yde H ANCES Fr S o T o H P Tecumseh, Shawnee Indian leader, Del Prado entrance hall ceiling This Newsletter is published by the Hyde Park Historical Society, a old Buildings, Hyde Park Historical Society not-for-profit organization founded CoLLECTINg AND PrESErVINg HyDE PArk’S History in 1975 to record, preserve, and New Views Time for you to join up or renew? promote public interest in the history Fill out the form below and return it to: of Hyde Park. Its headquarters, must have walked by this building a hundred “I times but never once looked in,“ remarked The Hyde Park Historical Society located in an 1893 restored cable car Mindy Schwartz. Such were the sentiments of many 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue • Chicago, IL 60637 station at 5529 S. Lake Park Avenue, of the more than fifty history and architecture buffs touring landmark hotels on Hyde Park’s east side in ✁ houses local exhibits. It is open to late September. Mindy was eying Grecian sculptures Enclosed is my new renewal membership the public on Saturdays and Sundays of faces, pillars, and wall decorations propped against Bob Dalby examines a wall feature in the East Park Tower Hotel in the Hyde Park Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Places to Visit in Chicago
    Top Places to Visit in Chicago 1.Sears Tower When the Sears Tower was completed in 1973 it was the tallest building in the world. As of 2009, it remains the tallest skyscraper in the United States but has slipped to the world’s third tallest building. As one of the top tourist attractions in Chicago, the Sears Tower Skydeck offers visitors a spectacular view of the city. It’s located on the 103rd floor that’s 1,353 feet above the ground. Adult tickets to the skydeck start at $14.95 while children tickets begin at $10.50. The best time to visit is when the skydeck opens (times varies depending on the season) or after 6 P.M. You can find the Sears Tower at 233 South Wacker Drive or you can just head towards the really tall building. 2. Navy Pier Navy Pier is 50-acres of parks, gardens, shops, rides, restaurants and attractions. Every year over eight and half million people visit this historic playground situated on a rectangle of land jutting out into Lake Michigan. The pier’s physical address is 600 East Grand Avenue. It was built in 1916 and then renovated into its current state in the 1990’s to the tune of $200 million. At Chicago’s Navy Pier you can ride the 15-story tall McDonald’s Ferris Wheel, take your kids to the Chicago Children’s Museum or see a movie at the IMAX Theatre. The Pepsi Skyline Stage hosts countless live shows featuring everything from dancing to rock concerts.
    [Show full text]