Effect of Low Doses of Estradiol and Tamoxifen on Breast Cancer Cell Karyotypes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
238 M Rondón-Lagos et al. Breast cancer cell karyotypes, 23:8 635–650 Research E2 and tamoxifen Effect of low doses of estradiol and tamoxifen on breast cancer cell karyotypes Milena Rondón-Lagos1, Nelson Rangel1,2, Ludovica Verdun Di Cantogno3, Laura Annaratone1, Isabella Castellano1, Rosalia Russo1, Tilde Manetta4, Caterina Marchiò1,* and Anna Sapino1,5,* 1Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Correspondence 2Natural and Mathematical Sciences Faculty, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia should be addressed 3Pathology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy to C Marchiò or A Sapino 4Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Email 5Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy [email protected] or *(C Marchiò and A Sapino contributed equally to this work) [email protected] Abstract Evidence supports a role of 17β-estradiol (E2) in carcinogenesis and the large majority Key Words of breast carcinomas are dependent on estrogen. The anti-estrogen tamoxifen (TAM) f breast cancer cells is widely used for both treatment and prevention of breast cancer; however, it is also f estradiol carcinogenic in human uterus and rat liver, highlighting the profound complexity of its f tamoxifen actions. The nature of E2- or TAM-induced chromosomal damage has been explored using f chromosomal relatively high concentrations of these agents, and only some numerical aberrations abnormalities Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related and chromosomal breaks have been analyzed. This study aimed to determine the effects f chromosomal instability −8 −1 −6 −1 of low doses of E2 and TAM (10 mol L and 10 mol L respectively) on karyotypes of MCF7, T47D, BT474, and SKBR3 breast cancer cells by comparing the results of conventional karyotyping and multi-FISH painting with cell proliferation. Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (+) cells showed an increase in cell proliferation after E2 treatment (MCF7, T47D, and BT474) and a decrease after TAM treatment (MCF7 and T47D), whereas in ER− cells (SKBR3), no alterations in cell proliferation were observed, except for a small increase at 96 h. Karyotypes of both ER+ and ER− breast cancer cells increased in complexity after treatments with E2 and TAM leading to specific chromosomal abnormalities, some of which were consistent throughout the treatment duration. This genotoxic effect was higher in HER2+ cells. The ER−/HER2+ SKBR3 cells were found to be sensitive to TAM, exhibiting an increase in chromosomal aberrations. These in vitro results provide insights into the potential role of low doses of E and TAM in inducing 2 Endocrine-Related Cancer chromosomal rearrangements in breast cancer cells. (2016) 23, 635–650 Introduction 17β-estradiol (E2) is the main estrogenic hormone development at puberty and during sexual maturity. E2 that through the estrogen receptors (ER) acts on the may be procancerogenic by inducing (i) ER-mediated cell mammary gland regulating a wide variety of biological proliferation, (ii) gene mutation through a cytochrome processes including differentiation, cell proliferation, and P450-mediated metabolic activation, and (iii) aneuploidy http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2016 Society for Endocrinology This work is licensed under a Creative Commons DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0078 Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/24/2021 09:50:02PM via free access 10.1530/ERC-16-0078 Research M Rondón-Lagos et al. Breast cancer cell karyotypes, 23:8 636 E2 and tamoxifen (Russo & Russo 2006), through overexpression of (ER+/PR+/HER2+), and SKBR3 (ER−/PR−/HER2+) were Aurora-A (Aur-A), a centrosome kinase, and centrosome obtained from the American Type Culture Collection amplification (Li et al. 2004). In addition, in both ER+ and (ATCC) in March 2010. Cell lines were expanded and ER− breast cancer cells, E2 may induce chromatin structural stocked at −80°C and cells obtained from these stocks changes through the estrogen-related receptors (ERR) (Hu were thawed and used for the experiments. At the end et al. 2008). Although high levels of E2 are implicated in of experiments, short tandem repeat (STR) profiles were breast cancer in postmenopausal women (Bernstein & performed to confirm the authentication of the cell lines Ross 1993), constant low E2 concentrations, in the range used. All experiments were carried out in each cell line at of picograms, are sufficient to increase breast cancer risk in passages (P) below 30. premenopausal women (Chetrite et al. 2000). MCF7 (P19), T47D (P20), and SKBR3 (P16) were Tamoxifen (TAM) is a non-steroidal anti-estrogen with cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma), whereas BT474 partial agonistic activity, extensively used in the treatment (P18) was cultured in DMEM medium (Sigma). All culture of ERα-positive breast cancer. Response to TAM is frequently media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum of limited duration due to the development of resistance (FBS) (Sigma), antibiotic–antimycotic solution (1X) (Pearce & Jordan 2004, International Breast Cancer Study (Sigma), and L-glutamine (2 mM) (Invitrogen GmbH). Cells et al. 2006). Although ERα positivity is a well-established growing in 75 cm2 flasks were maintained at 37°C and 5% predictor of response to TAM and ERα-negative patients CO2. The absence of contamination with mycoplasma are considered nonresponders, it is known that 5–10% of was demonstrated by PCR assay. ERα-negative tumors do benefit from adjuvant TAM treatment (McGuire 1975, Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ E2 and TAM treatment Collaborative Group 1992, 1998, Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group et al. 2011, Gruvberger-Saal et al. 2007). In order to remove endogenous serum steroids and Paradoxically, it has been reported that TAM possesses exclude the weak estrogen agonistic activity of phenol red a high mutagenic potential causing chromosome ruptures (Berthois et al. 1986), 48 h before the addition of E2 (E2758; in animal models (Mizutani et al. 2004). However, data on Sigma) and TAM (T5648; Sigma) cells were washed with type and frequency of chromosome abnormalities induced 5 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then switched by TAM are scant (Mizutani et al. 2004). In particular, to phenol red-free RPMI-1640 (Sigma) containing 10% cytogenetic studies about the effects of low doses of TAM, charcoal-stripped FBS (Sigma). E2 and TAM were dissolved Endocrine-Related Cancer Endocrine-Related as it is suggested for treatment of pre-invasive low-grade in absolute ethanol and diluted in the media at 10−8 mol L−1 breast lesions (e.g., low-grade ductal carcinomas in situ and 10−6 mol L−1, respectively, and then added to the or lobular intraepithelial neoplasia), are limited (Kedia- culture medium at 24, 48, and 96 h. These concentrations have been demonstrated to be the lowest to induce an Mokashi et al. 2010). The nature of E2- or TAM-induced chromosomal damage has been explored using relatively effect on the architecture of the cytoskeleton in breast high concentrations of these agents, and only some cancer cells in vitro (Sapino et al. 1986). numerical aberrations and chromosomal breaks have Cells without treatment at 24 h (T24 h) and at 96 h been analyzed (Tsutsui & Barrett 1997, Mizutani et al. (T96 h) were used as controls. 2004, Quick et al. 2008, Kedia-Mokashi et al. 2010). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of Proliferation assay low doses of E2 and TAM on chromosomal rearrangements Cells were seeded at a density of 2.5–5 × 103 cells per by comparing the results of conventional karyotyping 100 L of phenol red-free medium in a 96 multi-well and multicolor fluorescencein situ hybridization (M-FISH) μ plate and after 24 h were treated with E and TAM painting with cell proliferation activity of human breast 2 for 24, 48, and 96 h. At the end of each treatment, cell cancer cells with differential expression of ER and HER2. proliferation was assessed using the cell proliferation ELISA kit, BrdU (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH). Materials and methods Measurement of absorbance was performed by using a MultiSkan Bichromatic reader (Labsystems, Midland, Cell lines Canada) against a background control as blank. Each The human breast cancer cell lines MCF7 and T47D treatment was performed in 24 replicates and expressed as (ER+/progesterone receptor (PR)+/HER2−), BT474 means ± standard deviation (S.D.). http://erc.endocrinology-journals.org © 2016 Society for Endocrinology Published by Bioscientifica Ltd. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-16-0078 Printed in Great Britain Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 09/24/2021 09:50:02PM via free access Research M Rondón-Lagos et al. Breast cancer cell karyotypes, 23:8 637 E2 and tamoxifen Metaphase spreads and G-banding series, air-dried, covered with 10 μL of probe cocktail (denatured), and hybridized for 2 days at 37°C. Slides To determine whether E and TAM treatment resulted 2 were then washed with post-hybridization buffers, in the induction of chromosomal abnormalities, we dehydrated in ethanol series, and counterstained with performed conventional and molecular cytogenetic 10 μL of DAPI/antifade. Signal detection and subsequent analysis in parallel with the evaluation of cell proliferation. metaphase analysis were done using the Metafer system Metaphases were obtained by using standardized and Metasytems’ ISIS software (software for spectral harvesting protocols in order to perform conventional karyotypes) (Carl Zeiss, Metasystems, GmbH, Germany) and molecular cytogenetic analysis (multi-FISH and (Rondon-Lagos et al. 2014a,b). FISH). Briefly, colcemid solution (0.03 μg/mL) (Sigma) was added to cultures 2.5 h before cell harvesting; cells were then treated with hypotonic solution, fixed three times Immunohistochemistry (IHC) with Carnoy’s fixative (3:1 methanol to acetic acid), and spread on glass. For analysis of chromosomal alterations, Immunohistochemistry for ER and PR was carried out the slides were banded with G-banding.