Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council General Meeting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council General Meeting MINUTE of the MEETING of ROUSAY, EGILSAY, WYRE AND GAIRSAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL, held in the ROUSAY CHURCH CENTRE HALL on SATURDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2014 at 10.15 a.m. Present: Mr A Firth, Ms C Cox, Mr R Koster, Mr Eric Shortland and Mr R Tipper In Attendance: Councillor G Sinclair Mrs M Spence, Democratic Services Manager Miss K Rendall, Community Council Liaison Officer Mrs M Spence, Democratic Services Manager Mrs D Compton, Clerk 1 Member of the Public 1. APOLOGIES RESOLVED to note that there were no apologies. 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES (a) General Meeting of 10 September 2013 RESOLVED that the Minute of the Meeting held on 10 September 2013 was approved, being proposed by Mr Tipper and seconded by Mr Koster. (b) Informal Meeting of 30 November 2013 RESOLVED that the Note of the Informal Meeting held on 30 November 2013 was approved, being proposed by Mr Firth and seconded by Mr Shortland. 3. MATTERS ARISING (a) Rousay Community Association – Purchase of Fireworks (30.11.13, para 8 (a)) Members heard that following agreement at the Meeting of 30 November 2013 to grant financial assistance of £350 to Rousay Community Association towards the purchase of fireworks for the display in Rousay, the Clerk had contacted members and received a majority decision in favour of this and had made an application to Community Council Grant Scheme (CCGS) accordingly, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the report. (b) Rousay Primary School – Christmas Presents 2013 (30.11.13. para 8 (c)) Members heard that following agreement at the Meeting of 30 November 2013 to make a donation of £250 to Rousay Primary School towards the purchase of Christmas presents, the Clerk had contacted members and received a majority decision in favour of this and had processed the payment from the General Fund, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the report. 2 (c) Orkney Foodbank Group (30.11.13, para 8 (b)) Members heard that following agreement at the meeting of 30 November 2013 to make a donation of £100 to the Orkney Foodbank Group, the Clerk had contacted members and received a majority decision in favour of this and had processed the payment from the General Fund, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the report. (d) Winter Maintenance Plan 2013/14 (30.11.13, para 6 (e))) Consideration was given to correspondence received from Democratic Services, copies of which had been circulated, regarding a consultation on the Winter Maintenance Plan 2013/14, and following discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence and that members had no comments. (e) Audit Report on Medication Delivery Times – Rousay GP (30.11.13, para 4 (e))) Consideration was given to correspondence received from Dr Brunt, GP of the Island View Surgery, Rousay, copies of which had been circulated, regarding the medication delivery times for patients, and following discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence and that the Clerk would request a copy of the April audit. (f) Sunday Ferry Service in Winter (30.11.13, para 10 (d)) Consideration was given to correspondence received from Democratic Services, copies of which were circulated, in response to the Community Council’s request for clarification on the costing, service provision and savings to Orkney Ferries if extra crew were available for Sunday sailings. Members heard a report from Mr Shortland regarding the Inter-Isles Ferry Consultative Committee meeting, and following discussion, it was:- RESOLVED:- (1) to note that there was an increase in the estimated cost of providing the Sunday ferry service; (2) to note that the quote was for provision of a full day’s service; (3) to note that Orkney Ferries indicated there would be difficulty in recruiting staff from Rousay and to request that this comment be withdrawn, as members noted that recruitment had not taken place for some time; (4) to note that there would be no cost saving to Orkney Ferries; (5) that the Clerk would contact Democratic Services asking them to request that the Chairman of the Board of Orkney Ferries Board consider applying for a growth bid to the budget to provide a Sunday service; and (6) that the Clerk would provide a report as evidence in support of this request. 3 (g) Quote for Building Stone Mr Shortland declared an interest and left the meeting. Consideration was given to one quote received for supply of building stone suitable for repairing the Kirkyard dyke walls and the Clerk reported that it was still to be confirmed whether the Orkney Islands Council Roads Operative could carry out the work. Following discussion, it was:- RESOLVED:- (1) to accept the quote and to purchase fifty tonnes of building stone; and (2) to make an application for assistance through CCGS on a project cost of £2000. (h) Sourin School House Consideration was given to correspondence received from Democratic Services, copies of which were circulated, reporting that the Head of Housing and Homelessness had advised that there was potential for the Sourin Schoolhouse to be available for the Head Teacher if required, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. 4. CORRESPONDENCE (a) North Isles Officer – Police Orkney Following consideration of correspondence from Police Orkney, copies of which had been circulated, advising that there was a new North Isles Officer, and following brief discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence and that the Clerk would invite the North Isles Officer to attend Community Council meetings. (b) Update on the Pentland Firth & Orkney Waters Marine Spatial Plan – Marine Scotland Following consideration of correspondence received from Marine Scotland, copies of which had been circulated, providing information on action to be taken following the consultation and events that had taken place locally, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (c) Carriage of Road Tankers/Petrol and Diesel on Orkney Ferries – Mr L McArthur MSP Consideration was given to correspondence received from Mr L McArthur MSP regarding the Orkney Ferries change in policy, in that road tankers could no longer carry petrol and diesel in the same vehicle, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. 4 (d) Scottish Rural Parliament – Scottish Rural Action Following consideration of correspondence from the Chair of Scottish Rural Action regarding the Scottish Rural Parliament, copies of which had been circulated, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (e) Review of Traffic Warden Service Provision – Police Scotland Following consideration of correspondence received from the Assistant Chief Constable, Local Policing West, copies of which had been circulated, informing members that following the recent traffic warden review, changes were to come into force from 3 February 2014, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (f) Agenda and Minutes – Orkney Local Access Forum Following consideration of correspondence received from the Orkney Local Access Forum, and after brief discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (g) Islands Community Renewables Projects – Orkney Renewable Energy Forum Following consideration of correspondence received from Orkney Renewable Energy Forum asking members to consider putting the location of the community wind turbine in the ‘Islands of Orkney’ tourist brochure, the Clerk reported that this matter had already been dealt with, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (h) Proposed National Planning Framework 3 and Scottish Planning Policy – Scottish Government Consideration was given to correspondence received from the Scottish Government, copies of which had been circulated, regarding the consultation on Scotland’s Third National Planning Framework and Scottish Planning Policy, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (i) Inter-Isles Ferry Services Consultative Committee – Orkney Islands Council RESOLVED to note that this item had been taken under item 4 (f). (j) Invitation to visit the MV Hamnavoe – Serco NorthLink Ferries Consideration was given to an invitation received from Serco NorthLink Ferries to visit the Hamnavoe, copies of which had been circulated, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. 5 (k) Princes Countryside Fund – Plunkett Foundation Following consideration of correspondence received from Plunkett Scotland, copies of which had been circulated, regarding funding that they had received from the Princes Countryside Fund towards the cost of study visits and mentoring support for rural community enterprises, and after brief discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence and that the Clerk would forward a copy of the document to the Rousay, Egilsay and Wyre Development Trust. (l) Renewable Energy for Communities – SAC Consulting Following consideration of correspondence received from SAC Consulting, copies of which had been circulated, providing details of the service they can offer to help groups identify and progress renewables projects, and after brief discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence. (m) Our Islands Our Future Engagement Event – Orkney Islands Council Following consideration of correspondence received from Orkney Islands Council inviting all isles community councillors to attend an Our Islands Our Future Engagement Event on 3 March 2014, and after brief discussion, it was:- RESOLVED to
Recommended publications
  • Results of the Seabird 2000 Census – Great Skua
    July 2011 THE DATA AND MAPS PRESENTED IN THESE PAGES WAS INITIALLY PUBLISHED IN SEABIRD POPULATIONS OF BRITAIN AND IRELAND: RESULTS OF THE SEABIRD 2000 CENSUS (1998-2002). The full citation for the above publication is:- P. Ian Mitchell, Stephen F. Newton, Norman Ratcliffe and Timothy E. Dunn (Eds.). 2004. Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland: results of the Seabird 2000 census (1998-2002). Published by T and A.D. Poyser, London. More information on the seabirds of Britain and Ireland can be accessed via http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1530. To find out more about JNCC visit http://www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1729. Table 1a Numbers of breeding Great Skuas (AOT) in Scotland and Ireland 1969–2002. Administrative area Operation Seafarer SCR Census Seabird 2000 Percentage Percentage or country (1969–70) (1985–88) (1998–2002) change since change since Seafarer SCR Shetland 2,968 5,447 6,846 131% 26% Orkney 88 2,0001 2,209 2410% 10% Western Isles– 19 113 345 1716% 205% Comhairle nan eilean Caithness 0 2 5 150% Sutherland 4 82 216 5300% 163% Ross & Cromarty 0 1 8 700% Lochaber 0 0 2 Argyll & Bute 0 0 3 Scotland Total 3,079 7,645 9,634 213% 26% Co. Mayo 0 0 1 Ireland Total 0 0 1 Britain and Ireland Total 3,079 7,645 9,635 213% 26% Note 1 Extrapolated from a count of 1,652 AOT in 1982 (Meek et al., 1985) using previous trend data (Furness, 1986) to estimate numbers in 1986 (see Lloyd et al., 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Cruising the ISLANDS of ORKNEY
    Cruising THE ISLANDS OF ORKNEY his brief guide has been produced to help the cruising visitor create an enjoyable visit to TTour islands, it is by no means exhaustive and only mentions the main and generally obvious anchorages that can be found on charts. Some of the welcoming pubs, hotels and other attractions close to the harbour or mooring are suggested for your entertainment, however much more awaits to be explored afloat and many other delights can be discovered ashore. Each individual island that makes up the archipelago offers a different experience ashore and you should consult “Visit Orkney” and other local guides for information. Orkney waters, if treated with respect, should offer no worries for the experienced sailor and will present no greater problem than cruising elsewhere in the UK. Tides, although strong in some parts, are predictable and can be used to great advantage; passage making is a delight with the current in your favour but can present a challenge when against. The old cruising guides for Orkney waters preached doom for the seafarer who entered where “Dragons and Sea Serpents lie”. This hails from the days of little or no engine power aboard the average sailing vessel and the frequent lack of wind amongst tidal islands; admittedly a worrying combination when you’ve nothing but a scrap of canvas for power and a small anchor for brakes! Consult the charts, tidal guides and sailing directions and don’t be afraid to ask! You will find red “Visitor Mooring” buoys in various locations, these are removed annually over the winter and are well maintained and can cope with boats up to 20 tons (or more in settled weather).
    [Show full text]
  • Kirkwall to Westray
    Sailing notes downloaded from the Orkney Marinas website. www.orkneymarinas.co.uk Kirkwall to Westray We hope you find these notes helpful and of interest to you while planning your sailing trip to Orkney. Please note they are not intended to be used for navigation The quickest journey time from Kirkwall to Pierowall is on the ebb, leaving Kirkwall to cross the Westray Firth on the last of the ebb as by the time the tide is running N.E through Fersness and Weatherness sounds. It makes little difference to the journey times when leaving Kirkwall whether one goes out through Vasa or the Bouyed channel nearer Gairsay, Vasa probably best on the ebb, Bouyed best on the flood. When crossing the Westray Firth if there is any westerly type weather it is advisable to keep well over to the Green Holmes and across to Seal Skerry on the west side of Eday. In westerly conditions, the further west one goes the worse the conditions are with a very rough edge of tide running from Seal Skerry to the SW corner of Rusk Holm and NW to Rull Noost off Wart Holm especially during the last 2 hours of the ebb. Best avoided. If conditions are not adverse let the tide carry you to the west of Rusk Holm and NE to Weatherness, this is the quickest route. Fersness or Weatherness sounds can be used with the deeper water in Fersness. The tide in both places tends to run east for 4 hours and west for 8 hours. If sailing from Kirkwall during flood tide your journey time will be somewhat longer.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Medicine
    HISTORY OF MEDICINE The air-ambulance: Orkney's experience R. A. COLLACOTT, MA, DM, PH.D, MRCGP RCGP History of General Practice Research Fellow; formerly General Practitioner, Isle of Westray, Orkney Islands SUMMARY. The paramount problem for the de- isolated medical service. Patients could be transferred livery of the medical services in the Orkneys has between islands and from the islands to mainland been that of effective transport. The develop- Scotland. It became easier for general practitioners to ment of an efficient air-ambulance service has obtain the assistance of colleagues in other islands, had a major impact on medical care. The service which led to more effective specialist services in the started in 1934, but was abolished at the outset of main island townships of Kirkwall in the Orkney Isles, the Second World War and did not recommence Stornoway in the Hebrides and Lerwick in the Shetland until 1967. This paper examines the evolution of Isles. The air-ambulance made attending regional cen- the air-ambulance service in the Orkney Islands, tres such as Aberdeen easier and more comfortable for and describes alternative proposals for the use of patients than the conventional, slower journey by boat: aircraft in this region. for example, the St Ola steamer took four to five hours to sail between Kirkwall and Wick via Thurso whereas the plane took only 35 minutes; furthermore, patients Introduction often became more ill as a result of the sea journey alone, the Pentland Firth being notorious for its stormy UNLIKE the other groups of Scottish islands, the I Orkney archipelago a of seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedarlee, Rousay, KW17 2PU
    T: 01856 873151 F: 01856 875450 E: [email protected] W: www.lowsorkney.co.uk Cedarlee, Rousay, KW17 2PU Cedarlee is a beautiful cedar-clad 2 bedroom detached cottage situated on the island of Rousay with sea views towards Wyre and OFFERS OVER Gairsay. £130,000 The dwellinghouse stands in excellent decorative order and includes a large mature well- maintained garden. • UPVC framed double glazed windows and doors. • Air to water central heating. • Open plan living/kitchen/dining room. • Neutral décor throughout. • High standard of accommodation. • 2 bedrooms with built in wardrobes. • Bathroom with electric shower over bath. • Driveway to front. • Large fully enclosed mature garden with lawn, trees, bushes, plants, drying area and patio area. • Sea views towards Wyre and Gairsay. LOCATION Cedarlee is situated on the picturesque island of Rousay close to the pier. There is a primary school, shop and hotel. The island is connected to the Orkney mainland by a scheduled ferry service. BEDROOM 1 BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM 1 EN-SUITE Cedarlee, Rousay © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence number SR 100001231 SERVICES – Mains electricity. Private water supply. Private septic tank. ENERGY PERFORMANCE RATING – Band C. ENTRY – Entry by arrangement but not before middle October 2019. FIXTURES AND FITTINGS – All floor coverings and white goods are included in the sale price. Some items of furniture may be available by separate negotiation. VIEWING - For an appointment to view please contact Lows Property Department. PRICE – Offers over £130,000. Further enquires should be directed to Lows Property Department, with whom all offers should be lodged in writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Minute of the Meeting of Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council Held on 8 February 2020
    Minute of the meeting of Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council held in Rousay Community School on Saturday, 8 February 2020 at 10:15 Present: Mr A Firth, Mr R Tipper, Mr R Friel, Mr J Garson and Mrs Z Flaws. In Attendance: • Mrs E Soames Clerk. Order of Business. 1. Apologies ............................................................................................................ 2 2. Minute of Meeting held on 9 November 2019 ..................................................... 2 3. Matters Arising .................................................................................................... 2 4. Correspondence ................................................................................................. 3 5. Financial Statements .......................................................................................... 4 6. Financial Requests ............................................................................................. 5 7. Consultations ...................................................................................................... 5 8. Reports from Representatives ............................................................................ 6 9. Publications ........................................................................................................ 6 10. Any Other Competent Business........................................................................ 6 11. Dates of Next Meetings .................................................................................... 6 12. Conclusion
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Scoping Report Westray South Tidal Array
    Environmental Scoping Report Westray South Tidal Array October 2011 Rev 0.1 Prepared JRT & IH Checked FT, AD, FF, RB Approved RB & JT Date of October By By By Issue 2011 Page 2 of 259 Scoping report - Westray South CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 13 1.1 The Developer ...................................................................................................... 13 1.2 Project Overview and Agreement for Lease .......................................................... 13 1.3 Development Process ........................................................................................... 15 1.4 Pre-scoping consultation ....................................................................................... 20 2 PROJECT BOUNDARIES, APPROACH TO EIA AND CONSENTING PROCESS ...... 21 2.1 Geographical boundaries ...................................................................................... 21 2.2 Technical boundaries ............................................................................................ 22 2.3 Approach to EIA – Rochdale Envelope ................................................................. 23 2.4 Consenting approach ........................................................................................... 24 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................... 26 3.1 Offshore infrastructure .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Orkney Greylag Goose Survey Report 2013
    The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese on Orkney, August 2013 A report by the Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust to Scottish Natural Heritage Kane Brides1, Alan Leitch2 & Eric Meek3 November 2013 1 Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester GL2 7BT 2 The Willows, Finstown, Orkney KY17 2EJ 3 Smyril, Stenness, Orkney KW16 3JX © Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the copyright holder. This publication should be cited as: Brides, K., A.J. Leitch & E. Meek. 2013. The abundance and distribution of British Greylag Geese on Orkney, August 2013. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Report, Slimbridge. 16pp. Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust Slimbridge Gloucestershire GL2 7BT T 01453 891900 F 01453 890827 E [email protected] Reg. Charity no. 1030884 England and Wales, SC039410 Scotland Contents Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Methods 2 2.1 Field counts 2 2.2 Age counts 2 3 Results 3 3.1 Field counts 3 3.2 Habitat preferences of Greylag Geese 5 3.3 Age counts 6 4 Discussion 7 5 Acknowledgments 8 6 References 8 Appendix 1. Person-days used to count Greylag Geese on Orkney during 2013. 9 Appendix 2. Base maps of islands in Orkney showing areas of coverage. 10 Summary 1. A survey involving field counts of British Greylag Geese on the Orkney archipelago counted 20,242 birds. 2. A sample of 1,285 birds was aged and was found to contain 18.1% young.
    [Show full text]
  • Rousay Egilsay Wyre and Gairsay Community Council Minutes
    MINUTES of the MEETING of ROUSAY, EGILSAY, WYRE & GAIRSAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL (REWGCC), held in the ROUSAY COMMUNITY SCHOOL on TUESDAY 20 SEPTEMBER 2011, at 7.30 pm. Present: Mr R Tipper, Mr M Hull, Mr JE Dick, Mr A Firth, Miss I Murray and Mr E Shortland. In attendance: Councillor S Harcus Mrs K Drever, Community Council Liaison Officer Mrs D Compton, Clerk 1. APOLOGIES RESOLVED to note that apologies for absence had been intimated on behalf of Mr EJA Flaws. 2. ADOPTION OF MINUTES – 21 JUNE 2011 The minutes of the meetings held on 21 June 2011 were approved, being proposed by Mr JE Dick and seconded by Miss I Murray. 3. MATTERS ARISING FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS a) Closure of Egilsay School (5.2.11, para 5) Following consideration of the Minutes of the Education & Leisure Committee meeting held on 2 February 2011 and the General Meeting of Orkney Islands Council, 1 March 2011, regarding the closure of Egilsay School with effect from 22 August 2011, and that Scottish Ministers were required to endorse the Council’s proposal, Members briefly discussed this matter, and it was:- RESOLVED to note the contents of the correspondence and await the Scottish Ministers’ decision. b) Heritage & Visitors Centre (5.2.11, para 4 (a)) Following consideration of correspondence received from the Clerk, showing a picture of the updated notice board in the Heritage & Visitors Centre, Members heard representation from Mr A Firth who had viewed the board, and it was:- RESOLVED to note that the information had been updated and this item concluded.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names in Orkney from 16Th- and 17Th-Century Maps
    Place names in Orkney from 16th- and 17th-century maps Lachlan of Cromarty Ian McIntosh [email protected] For this project, I recorded the Orkney Island placenames found on maps published in the second half of the sixteenth century and the rst half of the seventeenth century. I compared those spellings to modern Ordinance Survey maps. Nearly all placenames in Orkney are of Scandinavian origin, and very few are of Gaelic origin. Norse migration from the North completely superseded the previous, Pictish inhabitants of the islands. Especially characteristic are suxes of Old Norse origin; -ay (meaning `island'), -holm (meaning `round topped or grassy islet') and -skerry (meaning `rocky islet'). The maps I have organized the period maps at my disposal into two categories: those based upon early sixteenth century data, and those based upon the survey of Timothy Pont in the 1580s and 1590s. Maps in the former category were published in the late 16th C and very early 17th C For simplicity sake, I refer to these maps as 16th-C Maps. Maps of the latter category were all published in the 17th C, after Pont's death. I refer to these maps as 17th-C Maps. 16th C maps In the 16th-C Maps category are the maps of Abraham Ortelius, Gerhard Mercator, and John Speed. These maps are based upon documentation completed in the early sixteenth century, which is now lost. In his article, A History of Orkney Maps, John Chesters theorizes that Ortelius' map, circa 1575, was based upon an early draft of Gerhard Mercator's.
    [Show full text]
  • Minute of the Meeting of Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council Held on 23 January 2021
    Minute of the meeting of Rousay, Egilsay, Wyre and Gairsay Community Council held via Microsoft Teams on Saturday, 23 January 2021 at 10:15 Present: Mr Angus Firth, Mrs Christina Cox, Mr Robert Friel and Mr John Garson. In Attendance: • Councillor Stephen Clackson. • Councillor Graham Sinclair. • Councillor Heather Woodbridge. • Mrs Maureen Spence, Democratic Services Manager. • Mrs Jenny McGrath, Community Council Liaison Officer/Interim Clerk. Order of Business. 1. Apologies ............................................................................................................ 2 2. Adoption of Minute .............................................................................................. 2 3. Grass Cutting Tenders ........................................................................................ 2 4. Matters Arising .................................................................................................... 2 5. Correspondence ................................................................................................. 3 6. Financial Statements .......................................................................................... 6 7. Financial Requests ............................................................................................. 6 8. Consultation - Police Scotland – Equality Outcomes 2021-2025 ........................ 6 9. Reports from Representatives ............................................................................ 7 10. Publications .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Location Guidance.Pdf
    PART 2: REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR MARINE ENERGY 101 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION TO REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE FOR MARINE ENERGY FOCUS OF THE REGIONAL LOCATIONAL GUIDANCE (RLG) FOR MARINE 100m. It is recognised that depths greater than 60m may be a current ENERGY economic/practical limit for seabed tidal devices, but deeper deployments may be viable. Wave devices are capable of significantly greater water depth deployment The Regional Locational Guidance (RLG) for Marine energy (wave and tidal due to the use of moorings. stream energy) has been prepared in support of the MSP Framework and the rapid increase in interest in the development of wave and tidal energy within the Tidal devices operating in water depths of less than 30m may be feasible in areas Pentland Firth. where vessel movements may be excluded or where development of the device results in a very low height requirement. The aims of the RLG are twofold: Bathymetry information has been obtained from UKHO admiralty chart data 1. Provide guidance to marine renewable energy developers on potential (Seazone). Given the age and limited sounding information used to form these areas of opportunity for future development and to highlight likely requirements for charts, it is likely that there are areas where the actual bathymetry may vary surveys, monitoring or interactions with existing uses that may be issues for significantly from that currently recorded. development. Tidal current information has been based on a hydrodynamic model operated by 2. Progress the marine spatial planning process in a way which enables Metoc based on a 200m rectilinear grid. The model is adequate for identifying the stakeholders and decision makers to respond to the rapid increase in interest in main resource areas but may be too coarse for the inter-island areas with narrow marine renewable energy developments whilst enabling ‘issues’ relating to other channels and poorly resolved bathymetry data.
    [Show full text]