DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT on the Main Estimates and The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT on the Main Estimates and The REPORT ON THE Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the year ending March 31, 2021 Standing Senate Committee on National Finance SECOND REPORT The Honourable Percy Mockler, Chair The Honourable Éric Forest, Deputy Chair The Honourable Marty Klyne, Deputy Chair The Honourable David Richards, Member of the Steering Committee December 2020 PAGE 1 MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE The Honourable Percy Mockler, Chair The Honourable Éric Forest, Deputy Chair The Honourable Marty Klyne, Deputy Chair The Honourable David Richards, Member of the Steering Committee The Honourable Peter M. Boehm The Honourable Jean-Guy Dagenais The Honourable Marty Deacon The Honourable Pat Duncan The Honourable Rosa Galvez The Honourable Tony Loffreda The Honourable Elizabeth Marshall The Honourable Larry W. Smith Ex-officio members: The Honourable Marc Gold, P.C. (or Raymonde Gagné) and the Honourable Donald Plett (or Yonah Martin) Other Senators who participated in the study: The Honourable Kim Pate Parliamentary Information and Research Service, Library of Parliament: Alex Smith, Analyst Shaowei Pu, Analyst Committees Directorate: Maxime Fortin, Clerk of the Committee Louise Martel, Administrative Assistant of the Committee Andrea Mugny, Procedural Clerk PAGE 2 ORDER OF REFERENCE Extract from the Journals of the Senate of Wednesday, November 18, 2020: With leave of the Senate, The Honourable Senator Gagné moved, seconded by the Honourable Senator Gold, P.C.: That the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance be authorized to examine and report upon the expenditures set out in the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2021. The question being put on the motion, it was adopted. Interim Clerk of the Senate Richard Denis PAGE 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ...................................................................................................................... 1 ORDER OF REFERENCE ................................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 4 OBSERVATIONS ................................................................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1 TREASURY BOARD OF CANADA SECRETARIAT ................................................................................. 7 2 PUBLIC SERVICES AND PROCUREMENT CANADA ........................................................................... 10 3 PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA ............................................................................................... 12 4 HEALTH CANADA ................................................................................................................................... 15 5 EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA ..................................................................... 17 6 INDIGENOUS SERVICES CANADA ....................................................................................................... 19 7 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE CANADA .................................................................................................. 22 8 TRANSPORT CANADA ........................................................................................................................... 25 9 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ............................................................................................... 28 APPENDIX – WITNESSES WHO APPEARED BEFORE THE COMMITTEE .................................................. 31 PAGE 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As part of its oversight role, the Standing Senate Committee on National Finance considered the Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the year ending March 31, 2021, which were referred to the committee on November 18, 2020. The Main Estimates 2020–21 set out $125.1 billion in voted budgetary expenditures and $179.5 billion in statutory forecasts, for a total of $304.6 billion, which is an increase of 1.6% from the previous year’s main estimates. The Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 request Parliament’s approval for $20.9 billion in voted budgetary expenditures and increase forecasted budgetary statutory expenditures by $58.3 billion, for total budgetary expenditures of $79.2 billion. Non-budgetary statutory expenditures are forecasted to increase by $1.3 billion. Of these authorities, approximately $15 billion (74%) of the voted requirements and $57 billion (96%) of the statutory forecasts are related to the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to examine the Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates B, the committee held three meetings and questioned 40 officials from 14 organizations that are requesting total appropriations of approximately $16.7 billion in the supplementary estimates, which is 80% of the total voted amount requested. The committee also heard from President of the Treasury Board, the Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, and the Parliamentary Budget Officer. PAGE 5 OBSERVATIONS The committee’s observations from issues raised during the meetings include: 1. The federal government should provide clear and consistent monthly reports on the cost and performance of all its COVID-19-related programs. 2. The federal government should continue working with provinces and territories to ensure timely access to sufficient medical supplies across Canada. 3. The federal government, in cooperation with provinces and territories, should set out a clear plan of how and where COVID-19 vaccines will be distributed across Canada. It should also ensure that Canada increases its domestic capacity to develop and produce vaccines, medical countermeasures, medical supplies and personal protective equipment. 4. To ensure consistency and accessibility, Health Canada should work with provinces and territories to develop common standards for COVID-19 immunization records. 5. Employment and Social Development Canada should put in place new national standards for accommodations for temporary foreign workers in the agriculture sector by February 28, 2021. 6. Indigenous Services Canada should recognize its healthcare responsibilities and ensure the speedy deployment of COVID-19 vaccines to Indigenous communities, as their communities are at disproportionate risk of disastrous public health outcomes from the pandemic. 7. The federal, provincial, territorial, municipal and Indigenous governments should work together to share best practices and determine whether the objectives of the Safe Restart Agreement and the Safe Return to Class Fund have been achieved. 8. The federal government should work with provinces and territories, as well as regional and mainline air carriers, to develop support measures for the air transportation sector that require cooperation rather than competition and ensure continued service to all Canadians. 9. The federal government should ensure that sufficient funding is available to help small- and medium-sized businesses that were unable to access other federal supports, particularly in hard- hit sectors, such as tourism, restaurants, hotels, culture and retail. PAGE 6 INTRODUCTION The Standing Senate Committee on National Finance has an important role to play on behalf of Parliament and Canadians in examining the federal government’s spending plans, as outlined in the main and supplementary estimates. The committee reviews and presents reports on the government’s proposed spending in order to examine whether it is reasonable, takes into account value-for-money, will be effective in achieving the government’s objectives and allows parliamentarians to follow the money. The Main Estimates 2020–21 were tabled in the Senate on March 10, 2020. Two appropriation bills for interim supply, together representing approximately 9/12 of the amount set out in the main estimates, were passed in the previous session of Parliament. On October 2, 2020, these estimates were tabled again in the current session of Parliament in order to approve the remaining amount. The Main Estimates 2020–21 set out $125.1 billion in voted budgetary expenditures and $179.5 billion in statutory forecasts, for a total of $304.6 billion in budgetary expenditures, which is an increase of 1.6% from the previous year’s main estimates. The Main Estimates 2020–21 do not include new spending in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Supplementary Estimates (B), 2020–21 were tabled in the Senate on October 28, 2020. The Main Estimates and the Supplementary Estimates (B) for the year ending March 31, 2021 were referred to the committee on November 18, 2020. These supplementary estimates request Parliament’s approval for an additional $20.9 billion in voted budgetary expenditures and increase forecasted statutory budgetary expenditures by $58.3 billion, for total budgetary expenditures of $79.2 billion, which is an increase of 20% of expenditure authorities to date. Non-budgetary statutory expenditures are forecasted to increase by $1.3 billion. Of these authorities, approximately $15 billion (74%) of the voted requirements and $57 billion (96%) of the statutory forecasts are related to the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In order to examine the Main Estimates 2020–21 and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Unfulfilled Promise of Information Management in the Government of Canada
    DRAFT for discussion only Not for publication without the permission of the author The Unfulfilled Promise of Information Management in the Government of Canada David C.G. Brown Doctoral Candidate, Carleton University Senior Associate, Public Policy Forum Ottawa Abstract The advent of new information and communications technologies in the 1990s gave a more prominent role to information management (IM) as a discipline of public administration, offering the prospect of knowledge-based government in the knowledge- based economy and society. In the federal government, the promise of IM enabled by networked computing and database technologies has been highlighted by the move towards citizen-centred service and the provision of information-based services to the public. There has also been a growing recognition in many areas of government that their knowledge base is a defining element and a significant asset. This promise has not been fully realized, however, for a number of reasons. These include the historical neglect of information and records management in public administration, compounded by the lack of a unified understanding of what those activities encompass or even of how they relate to each other. There has also been a weak recognition and consequent undervaluing of information as a public resource, compounded by increasingly poor management of that resource in the electronic era. Vulnerabilities arise across the board, from the practices of individual public servants to government-wide ‘enterprise’ information architecture. The treatment of IM as a sub-set of the management of information technology has been another limiting factor, as have wariness at the political level and a weak connection to senior public service governance structures and the public sector reform agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury Board Secretariat
    TREASURY BOARD SECRETARIAT PRESENTATION TO THE COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS OF THE MECHANISM FOR FOLLOW-UP ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION (MESICIC) FIFTH ROUND OF REVIEW APRIL 25-27, 2017 Values and Ethics, Office of the Chief Human Resources Officer Objectives 1 To give you an overview of the Canadian Federal Public Service 2 To give you an overview of the role of the Treasury Board Secretariat 3 To speak to Values and Ethics in the Public Sector 2 Structure of the Executive Branch Prime Minister Cabinet Cabinet Committees Treasury Board Central Agencies Public Service Commission Privy Council Office Treasury Board Secretariat Hiring Policy Department of the Prime Minister Management Office Staffing investigations Government’s Policy Agenda Budget Office Oversight of Political Activities People Management Departments 3 The Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) • TBS: – Is a central agency and the administrative arm of the Treasury Board, providing advice and support to Treasury Board ministers by managing TB meetings and providing written advice – Is a department with roughly 1800 employees*. – Is led by the Secretary (deputy minister) and two other deputy ministers: the Comptroller General of Canada and the Chief Human Resources Officer. – Provides guidance to management functions within departments. – Provides direction, leadership and capacity building for functional communities across government (e.g. financial officers, human resources advisors, audit executives, etc.). • TBS supports TB in its four
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Deputy Ministers in Canadian Government
    10 The Role of Deputy Ministers in Canadian Government Chapter Summary The role of the deputy minister (DM) is the main interchange between the political head of a department, the minister, and the public servants of the department. In an advisory capacity to the minister, the deputy minister serves primarily as the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a department. The deputy minister is not subject to the merit system of the Public Service of Canada (PSC) but must follow most provisions as outlined in the Public Service Employment Act. A deputy minister’s position can be made through a discretionary appointment, by designation or selection, or through an appointment process by the Governor-in Council on the advice and recommendation of the prime minister. The powers of the deputy minister are not specified in any specific statute, except for several regulatory departments such as Revenue, Consumer Affairs, Justice, and Immigration. A DM is considered the manager of all of the financial and human resources of a department as well as serving as an accounting officer. In addition, the deputy minister implements the appropriate statutes for a department and can contribute to the drafting of rules and regulations and undertake related policy-making decisions. The accountability of a deputy minister can be both challenging and difficult to understand. The DM is answerable to many different people within the political process. For example, a DM is responsible to parliament and its committees for the work of his or her ministry and ultimately to the PM, who made the recommendation to have them serve as DM for a specific department.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2019–20 Departmental Plan
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2019–20 Departmental Plan Erratum In the table “Planned results: administrative leadership” of the original version of the Departmental Plan (page 19), September 2019 was given as the date for achieving the target for the indicator “Percentage of Government of Canada websites that deliver digital services to citizens securely.” That date has been changed to December 31, 2019, to align with subsection 6.2.3 of the Information Technology Policy Implementation Notice “Implementing HTTPS for Secure Web Connections.” The notice can be accessed at the following URL: https:// www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/modern-emerging-technologies/ policy-implementation-notices/implementing-https-secure-web-connections- itpin.html. Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2019–20 Departmental Plan Original signed by The Honourable Joyce Murray, P.C., M.P. President of the Treasury Board and Minister of Digital Government © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the President of the Treasury Board, 2019 Catalogue No. BT1-38E-PDF ISSN 2371-8919 This document is available on the Government of Canada website at www.canada.ca This document is available in alternative formats upon request. Table of contents President’s message ....................................................................................... 1 Plans at a glance and operating context ............................................................ 3 Planned results: what we want to achieve this year and beyond .........................
    [Show full text]
  • 5. the Responsibilities and Accountabilities of Deputy Ministers
    5 CHAPTER FIVE THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITIES OF DEPUTY MINISTERS This chapter examines the responsibilities and accountabilities of the most senior public servants, the Deputy Ministers. Deputy Ministers are the managers of the departments of government. Under their Ministers, they direct the administration of financial and human resources.They advise the Minister on policy issues and on reforms to administration.Together they form a community that must work as a team to coordinate and direct the work of government. Most policy initiatives cross-cut several departments and demand coordination of policy-making in several departments.Deputy Ministers have extensive management and other responsibilities. As the managers of departments, Deputy Ministers are responsible for the work and actions of the public servants under them. It is their job 83 84 RESTORING ACCOUNTABILITY:RECOMMENDATIONS to ensure that departmental administration meets established standards. Not only their Ministers but Parliament as well must be assured that Deputy Ministers fulfill their responsibilities as departmental managers. The Statutory Responsibilities of Deputy Ministers The statutory responsibilities of Deputy Ministers originate from two different sources.First are their responsibilities under the Interpretation Act1 and other departmental acts which permit Deputy Ministers to act in the name of Ministers for all powers possessed by Ministers, except the power to make regulations. There is no question that, for the exercise of these powers, Deputy Ministers act under the authority delegated by their particular Minister, and they are ultimately accountable to those Ministers for the use of these powers. Ministers are,in turn,accountable to Parliament for what was done,whether the Minister or the Deputy Minister actually made the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff: the Life and Times of Parliament’S Statutory Orphans
    MINISTERIAL STAFF: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF PARLIAMENT’S STATUTORY ORPHANS Liane E. Benoit Acknowledgements Much of the primary research in support of this paper was gathered through interviews with more than twenty former and current public servants, lobbyists, and ex-exempt staff. I am sincerely grateful to each of them for their time, their candour and their willingness to share with me the benefit of their experience and insights on this important subject. I would also like to acknowledge the generous assistance of Cathi Corbett,Chief Librarian at the Canada School of Public Service,without whose expertise my searching and sleuthing would have proven far more challenging. 145 146 VOLUME 1: PARLIAMENT,MINISTERS AND DEPUTY MINISTERS And lastly, my sincere thanks to C.E.S Franks, Professor Emeritus of the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University, for his guidance and support throughout the development of this paper and his faith that, indeed, I would someday complete it. 1 Where to Start 1.1 Introduction Of the many footfalls heard echoing through Ottawa’s corridors of power, those that often hit hardest but bear the least scrutiny belong to an elite group of young, ambitious and politically loyal operatives hired to support and advise the Ministers of the Crown. Collectively known as “exempt staff,”1 recent investigations by the Public Accounts Committee and the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities,hereafter referred to as the “Sponsorship Inquiry”, suggest that this group of ministerial advisors can, and often do, exert a substantial degree of influence on the development,and in some cases, administration, of public policy in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • ITS Acronyms AB Acquisitions Branch AC Access Control ACF Advanced
    ITS Acronyms AB Acquisitions Branch AC Access Control ACF Advanced Content Filtering ADM Assistant Deputy Minister AFH Adaptive Frequency Hopping AFT Assured File Transfer AKA Authentication and Key Agreement AT Awareness & Training ATIP Access to Information and Privacy AU Audit and Accountability BAA Behavioural Analysis and Analytics BBM BlackBerry Messenger BCP Business Continuity Plan BES BlackBerry Enterprise Server BIA Business Impact Analysis BNS Business Needs for Security BUC Business Use Cses BYOD Bring Your Own Device C&A Certification & Accreditation CA Contracting Authority CCI Controlled Cryptographic Instruments CDRFMS Canadian Disaster Relief Fund Management System CDS Cross Domain Solution CIA Confidentiality Integrity and Availability CIO Chief Information Officer CISD Canadian Industrial Security Directorate CM Configuration Management CM-A Change Management Assessment CM-D Change Management Documentation CM-E Change Management Engineering CMS Configuration Management System CONOPS Concept of Operations COTS Commercial off the Shelf CP Contingency Planning CS Computer Systems CSE Communications Security Establishment CSIS Canadian Security Intelligence Service CSO Company Security Officer CSPS Canada School of Public Service CTEC Cyber Threat and Evaluation Centre CTO Chief Technology Officer CVE Common Vulnrtabilities and Exposures DB Data Base DBA Data Base Administrator DBMS Data Base Management System DDoS Distributed Denial of Service DDSM Directive on Departmental Security Management DG Director General DISA
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the Climate Resilience of Canadian Infrastructure
    Advancing the Climate Resilience of Canadian Infrastructure: A review of literature to inform the way forward IISD REPORT Darren Swanson Deborah Murphy Jennifer Temmer Todd Scaletta © 2021 International Institute for Sustainable Development | IISD.org July 2021 Advancing the Climate Resilience of Canadian Infrastructure © 2021 International Institute for Sustainable Development Published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. International Institute for Sustainable Development The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an Head Office award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for 111 Lombard Avenue, Suite 325 a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Winnipeg, Manitoba Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help Canada R3B 0T4 people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come Tel: +1 (204) 958-7700 together. IISD’s staff of more than 120 people, plus over 150 associates and Website: www.iisd.org consultants, come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With Twitter: @IISD_news offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries. IISD is a registered charitable organization in Canada and has 501(c)(3) status in the United States. IISD receives core operating support
    [Show full text]
  • The D E F ENCE TEAM
    EDIT DRDC-RDDC-2015-P120 Canada’s defence establishment is a unique organization, comprising two distinct E MAY 2015 D BY: institutions: the civilian-led Department of National Defence (DND), headed by the Deputy Minister of National Defence, and the military-led Canadian Armed Forces GOLDENBER (CAF), headed by the Chief of the Defence Staff. In practice, however, civilian and military personnel – collectively referred to as the Defence Team – work side by side in a variety of contexts, including on bases, on operations, in military academic settings, and at National Defence Headquarters. G , FEBBRARO & These highly integrated workforces allow Canada’s defence establishment to draw on the complementary expertise of military and civilian personnel. Nonetheless, some fundamental differences exist between the military and civilian institutions, most notably separate personnel management systems and distinct cultures that reflect the D different histories, values, roles and policies of Defence civilians and CAF members. EAN Understanding the unique benefits and challenges associated with this integrated workforce is therefore critical to optimal military-civilian personnel collaboration. THE This volume presents conceptual, empirical and historical analyses of the key contextual, organizational and interpersonal factors that influence collaboration between civilian and military personnel in DND and the CAF. The volume will appeal to a diverse audience, including Defence Team personnel, senior leaders in DND and the CAF, human resource professionals, military managers of civilian D personnel and civilian managers of military personnel, and a more general audience interested in workgroup and organizational diversity. The volume furthers our E understanding of military-civilian partnerships and will contribute to the discourse F on the evolution of the Defence Team within Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Managing Records in a Minister's Office
    Library and Archives Canada Guidelines on Managing Records in a Minister’s Office Table of Contents Foreword ...................................................................................................... 4 1. Effective Date ....................................................................................... 5 2. Application ............................................................................................ 5 3. Definitions ............................................................................................ 5 4. Context ................................................................................................ 5 5. Purpose ................................................................................................ 6 6. Records in a Minister’s office ................................................................... 6 6.1 Managing Records in a Minister’s office .................................................. 6 6.1.1. Segregation of Records .................................................................... 7 6.1.2. All media and formats ...................................................................... 8 6.1.3. Designated official ........................................................................... 8 6.2. Government Records in a Minister’s Office ............................................... 9 6.2.1. Identification of Government Records ................................................ 9 6.2.2. Responsibilities ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Questions of Conflict of Interest and Lobbying in Relation to Pandemic Spending
    QUESTIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND LOBBYING IN RELATION TO PANDEMIC SPENDING Report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics Chris Warkentin, Chair JUNE 2021 43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Transparency and Parliamentary Oversight of the Government’S Spending Plans
    IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY AND PARLIAMENTARY OVERSIGHT OF THE GOVERNMENT’S SPENDING PLANS Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates Tom Lukiwski, Chair JANUARY 2019 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]