KPMG's Global Automotive Executive Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KPMG's Global Automotive Executive Survey technological fit KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2015 Who is fit and ready to harvest? kpmg.com/GAES2015 How do we cut through complexity? View the interactive version of this survey online and filter the results based on your own preferences KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2015 Acknowledgements Foreword The Global Automotive Executive In coming years the automotive sector will need to achieve a fine balance Survey is KPMG International’s annual between its traditional product- and technology-driven past and its potentially assessment of the current state and ubiquitously connected consumer lifecycle-centric and service-driven future. future prospects of the worldwide automotive industry. In this year’s survey, 200 senior executives from As this year’s survey findings now in its 16th consecutive year. the world’s leading automotive demonstrate, the industry seems We have placed the findings online companies were interviewed, to be positioned halfway between and made them interactive, enabling including automakers, suppliers, these two imperatives. On the one you to not only digest our general dealers, financial services hand, increasingly strict regulatory conclusions, but to also draw your providers, rental companies standards call for a strong focus on own inferences for your specific and mobility solution powertrain optimization, rationalization area of interest, all of which should providers. The responses and standardization. On the other, help you cut through complexity were very insightful and we increasingly tech-savvy customers and extract the maximum value would like to thank all those are helping to create a completely for your business. who participated for giving new mobility culture. us their valuable time. I personally invite you to get involved Special thanks to Moritz Tomorrow’s consumers will not only and access our online version of the Pawelke and his team for expect, but demand new and survey at kpmg.com/GAES2015. their efforts. innovative services and mobile apps that plug seamlessly into ubiquitously Enjoy the read! connected solutions. To stay ahead, traditional automotive players may need to reinvent their business models and ask themselves two pressing questions: “how do I become a high value service brand, while making the most of my strong product and engineering heritage?” and secondly, “how do I think about my brand from a consumer perspective, to attract the new generation of ‘digital natives’?” Dieter Becker Global Head of It is not just the automotive industry Automotive that is changing; so has our survey, KPMG International 2 | KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2015 Contents Executive summary 4 About the survey 6 Mobility culture 8 What is driving consumer demand? Technological fit 16 Are companies betting on the right technologies? Business model readiness 26 Is the industry set for an unstable mobility eco-system? Prepared to harvest 34 Who is best positioned for sustainable growth? KPMG Global Automotive thought leadership 38 © 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2015 | 3 Executive summary Key trends to 2025 Vehicle segment Investment E-car market preferences priorities to 2020 penetration to 2025 Many innovative key trends are lower on executives’ The small and basic car Downsizing is still the High e-car market share agendas up to 2025: segment is expected number one powertrain forecasts appear contrary to to have a high growth investment area over the investment priorities: The majority of the executives potential in established next fi ve years: still feel that growth of and emerging markets The majority of auto execs emerging markets is the over the next fi ve years: However, since the 2014 from Western Europe and Mobility number one key trend. Technological survey, auto execs from China believe that the share culture Executives from mature fi t mature TRIAD markets have of electrified vehicles (among Only a minority of markets predict decreasing become relatively less overall new car registrations) respondents consider sales potential for the large focused on this area than will be between 11-15 Auto executives‘ alternative powertrain car segment up to 2020, with According to this their BRIC counterparts. percent. Respondents from views tend to refl ect technologies, mobility a more positive view of the year’s survey, North America are even more services and vehicle The number two investment concerns over basic and small car segment. the optimization optimistic, with most connectivity as extremely priority for both TRIAD and foreseeing a share of current commercial important key trends BRIC market respondents of traditional BRIC execs is fuel cell between 16-20 percent challenges, suggesting until 2025. envisage tremendous growth fossil fuel-based vehicles, replacing pure in 10 years. potential for all car size battery electric technology. a lack of consensus Please see p8-9 segments in the next fi ve propulsion Please see p20-21 Please see p16-17 over the shape of the years, particularly small and technologies still basic cars. future mobility Purchasing criteria dominates the Connectivity: eco-system. to 2020 Please see p12-13 technological E-car technology The next big thing roadmap. trends to 2020 Purchasing choices over Vehicle ownership The notion of self-driving the next fi ve years versus usage Plug-in hybrids are set to cars as the last evolutionary are not yet driven by attract the highest demand step of connectivity seems innovative concepts Vehicle ownership for all of all electrifi ed propulsion to be more distant than KPMG viewpoint and online services: age groups is considered technologies: media attention suggests: important up to 2020: Auto executives believe Although still rated as the Auto execs from mature Asian countries like Japan Auto execs are consumers are still fi xated Most respondents believe most important e-technology, plug-in hybrids’ popularity has and Korea are slightly more caught between on traditional product issues, vehicle ownership will still be with fuel effi ciency rated important for under-25s, while diminished year-on-year. optimistic about autonomous regulations that clearly as number one, those aged between 25-50 driving, believing there will be create technological closely followed by safety are expected to be even more Battery electric vehicles a breakthrough in the next 20 challenges, and and comfort. reliant on their own cars for remain in number two years. Respondents from position. However, in contrast satisfying the target personal mobility. Western Europe, North Compared to the 2014 survey, to prior years, a higher America and China are group of tech-savvy executives see a heavily Mobility services are forecast proportion of respondents more hesitant. mobility consumers, increased emphasis on to be an important source of believe demand for fuel cell that are never offl ine. enhanced vehicle lifespan, profit in fi ve to 10 years in electrical vehicles will increase Please see p22-23 most likely due to the both established and over the next fi ve years. burst of product recalls emerging markets. in recent years. Please see p18-19 Please see p14-15 Please see p10-11 Are companies betting on the right technologies? What is driving consumer demand? 4 | KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2015 © 2015 KPMG International Cooperative (“KPMG International”). KPMG International provides no client services and is a Swiss entity with which the independent member firms of the KPMG network are affiliated. Business model Readiness for a new Strategies Race for market disruption ahead? mobility eco-system to survive share until 2020 No major business model Traditional automotive OEMs’ key survival strategy In the medium term, change or disruptive event OEM brands should matter is to achieve and maintain traditional OEMs are is expected over the next most in 10 years’ time: global reach. forecast to maintain their fi ve years: dominance. However, they Auto execs believe For globally established should prepare for a more Most auto execs believe it is extremely likely that OEMs, such as BMW, disruptive future. Business that original equipment automotive premium and Volkswagen and Toyota, Prepared to model manufacturers (OEMs) mass market brands will remaining independent is harvest Auto execs are most will continue to own dominate over the next the top priority. optimistic that the readiness the customer relationship decade, followed by pure Hyundai group will increase up to 2020. e-car manufacturer brands. OEMs with limited global Executives feel there its global market share. reach, mainly from China will be no major shift Executives are very Please see p26-27 Brands from the ICT sector and mature Asian countries, Volkswagen is considered optimistic that are predicted to be more are most likely to merge with of power between to have far greater potential Business and investment traditional automotive important than traditional others in order to survive. OEMs until 2020. than its closest competitors, strategies should remain Tier 1 supplier brands. Toyota and GM. players can cope with conservative until 2020: Please see p32-33 an increasingly Global players like Daimler, When it comes to Chinese Organic growth is expected BMW and GM are considered OEMs, respondents rate unstable mobility to be the number one to be best prepared, closely Chery as having the best eco-system in the strategy for future success, followed by Volkswagen, chance of increasing market with two-thirds of auto Toyota and Ford. share up to 2020. short term. execs rating this factor as extremely important. In the executives’ eyes, Tata, another emerging newcomers like Tesla still OEM, is rated very positively Since 2014, an increasing have a huge gap to close and is expected to grow its KPMG viewpoint number of respondents feel it to achieve the awareness market share. will be necessary to diversify and reach of traditional Future automotive and expand the value chain OEM brands.
Recommended publications
  • Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry
    UC Berkeley Working Paper Series Title Keiretsu, Governance, and Learning: Case Studies in Change from the Japanese Automotive Industry Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/43q5m4r3 Authors Ahmadjian, Christina L. Lincoln, James R. Publication Date 2000-05-19 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Institute of Industrial Relations University of California, Berkeley Working Paper No. 76 May 19, 2000 Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry Christina L. Ahmadjian Graduate School of Business Columbia University New York, NY 10027 (212)854-4417 fax: (212)316-9355 [email protected] James R. Lincoln Walter A. Haas School of Business University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 (510) 643-7063 [email protected] We are grateful to Nick Argyres, Bob Cole, Ray Horton, Rita McGrath, Atul Nerkar, Toshi Nishiguchi, Joanne Oxley, Hugh Patrick, Eleanor Westney, and Oliver Williamson for helpful comments. We also acknowledge useful feedback from members of the Sloan Corporate Governance Project at Columbia Law School. Research grants from the Japan – U. S. Friendship Commission, the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and the Clausen Center for International Business and Policy of the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley are also gratefully acknowledged. Keiretsu, governance, and learning: Case studies in change from the Japanese automotive industry ABSTRACT The “keiretsu” structuring of assembler-supplier relations historically enabled Japanese auto assemblers to remain lean and flexible while enjoying a level of control over supply akin to that of vertical integration. Yet there is much talk currently of breakdown in keiretsu networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Renault-Nissan Alliance: Will Further Integration Create More Synergies?1
    W15481 RENAULT-NISSAN ALLIANCE: WILL FURTHER INTEGRATION CREATE MORE SYNERGIES?1 Wiboon Kittilaksanawong and Caroline Palecki wrote this case solely to provide material for class discussion. The authors do not intend to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation. The authors may have disguised certain names and other identifying information to protect confidentiality. This publication may not be transmitted, photocopied, digitized or otherwise reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission of the copyright holder. Reproduction of this material is not covered under authorization by any reproduction rights organization. To order copies or request permission to reproduce materials, contact Ivey Publishing, Ivey Business School, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, N6G 0N1; (t) 519.661.3208; (e) [email protected]; www.iveycases.com. Copyright © 2015, Richard Ivey School of Business Foundation Version: 2015-10-19 Renault-Nissan Alliance (RNA) was the oldest of its kind in the automotive industry, celebrating its 15th anniversary in March 2014. As of April 2015, it sold more than one in 10 cars worldwide.2 The alliance was formed on the principles of mutual respect while preserving each other’s brands and corporate identities. On April 1, 2014, to accelerate synergies, RNA launched convergence projects in four key functions: research and development, manufacturing and logistics, purchasing, and human resources, expecting to realize at least €4.3 billion3 in annualized synergies and cost
    [Show full text]
  • Zaibatsu: a Study of Japanese Combines Yesterday and Today
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1970 Zaibatsu: a study of Japanese combines yesterday and today. Smellow, Edwin Neil George Washington University http://hdl.handle.net/10945/15220 ZAIBATSU: A STUDY OF JAPANESE COMBINES YESTERDAY AND TODAY by Edwin Nei 1 Sme 1 low n T/^/V ZAIBAT3U: A STUDY OP JAPANESE COMBINES Y1STJSRDAX AKD TODAY BY Edwin Neil Smellr Bachelor of Arts Antloch College, 1958 j 1 A The ! ut : to the School of Gov< ; ^nd Bus it- ess j id' Ltion of The Gee-' on Eequixei for the Degree Cas1 Bu s ine s s LA minis tra tic March, 1970 Thesis directed by Id diaries Demoody, M.B.A. ' Associate Professor o; \ nisi ion n 5^ LIBRARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OE TABLES . iv LIST OE CHARTS . vi Chap ter I. INTRODUCTION. Objective Scope Organization and Mechanical Details II- ZAIBATSU—A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK. ....... Organization and Structure o;C Zaibatsu Companies Zalt atsu Economic Patterns HI- ZAIBATSU EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT. ...... yb Introduction Historical Perspective — The v/ Tpkugawa Era (1600-1868) Mitsui i Su : go, ^ Historical Perspective — The Meiji Era (1868-1912) Historical Perspective-- The Liberal Era (1914-1931) Historical Perspective— The 3 Ira of Kilitariam (1932-1945) IV. THE OCCUPATION EUA (1945-1952), ........ Introduction Background Occupation Economic Policies 2aiba_tgu Dissolution Personnel Purge Ma j o r Le g 3 s 1 a tio The Antimonopoly Law Deconcentration L American Policy Reorientation Chapter Page V. THE CHANGING FACE OP JAPAN (1932-1969) 99 Introduction Economic Perspective The Political-Economic Structure and Legislation Management Personnel General patterns of Stock Ownership The Trend Toward Increasing Oligopoly The Structure of Selected Prowar Zaitatsu Groups Intra -Group Relations and Interlocking Directorates VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Assignment: Bajaj Automobiles Name: Student
    Assignment: Bajaj Automobiles Name: Student ID: Acknowledgement I wish to express my sincere gratitude to PROF.H.G.BYRAPPA. This project bears on imprint of many peoples.I also wish to express my gratitude to the officials and other staff members. My special thanks to SIR A.RAVISHANKAR, ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER(MARKETING) of the company. For their kind co-operation to the completion of my project work. Last but not least I wish to avail myself of this opportunity, express a sense of gratitude and love to my friends and my beloved parents for their manual support, strength, and help and for everything. Place: Patna Date: 01-02-12 To Whom It May Concern: Anand Kumar has made cold drinks project report on Topic of “PEPSI” and had fulfilled the requirement. This project is submitted as a project Work carried out under the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the course. Signature of the Student Signature of Guide (Anand kumar) (Dr.Santosh Jha) 1. Introduction of Bajaj 2. Spin offs and Acquisitions 3. Products 4. Low Costs Car 5. COOPERATION WITH RENAULT AND NISSAN MOTOR 6. TIMELINE OF NEW RELEASES 7. SUMMARY 1. Introduction of Bajaj: - Bajaj Auto Limited Type Public (BSE: 532977, NSE: BAJAJ-AUTO) Industry Automotive Headquarters Pune, Maharashtra, India Key people Rahul Bajaj (Chairman) Products Motorcycles, three-wheeler vehicles and car Revenue 16,974 crore (2011) Net Income 3,454 crore (2011) Employees 10,250 (2006-07) Parent Bajaj Group Website www.bajajauto.com Bajaj Auto Limited (BSE: 532977, NSE: BAJAJ-AUTO) is an Indian motorized vehicle-producing company.
    [Show full text]
  • Cteyssje LIBRAIRIES-- Automotive Electronics Business
    Automotive Electronics Business by Yoshiko Hase Master of Electrical Engineering, Doshisha University, Japan 1997 Submitted to the MIT Sloan School of Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2007 C 2007 Yoshiko Hase. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis docment in whole or in part. Signature of Author: MIT Sloah School of Management May 11, 2007 Certified by: - / -Michael A. Cusumano Sloan ManagementvReview Distinguished Professor of Management Thesis Advisor Accepted by: ...-- / Stephen J.Sacca Director, MIT Sloan Fellows Program in Innovation and Global Leadership MASSACHUSETITS INSTMiUTE OF TECHN OLOGY JUL 0 2 2007 cteyssJE LIBRAIRIES-- Automotive Electronics Business by Yoshiko Hase Master of Electrical Engineering, Doshisha University, Japan 1997 Submitted to the MIT Sloan School of Management on May 11, 2007 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration ABSTRACT In the automotive industry, due to the trend to introduce active safety systems, concerns about protecting the environment, and advances in information technology, key automotive manufacturers are eager to acquire new enabling technologies which can provide solutions for these issues. As a result, the demand for automotive electronics is increasing. Meanwhile, due to strict requirements for demanding specifications, as well as low volume commitment offered by car manufacturers as compared with consumer electronics products, many electronics manufacturers have so far avoided entering this business. However, as the requirement for high technology grow, the technology of the electronics companies becomes indispensable for the car manufacturers.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Information 1.1MB
    Financial Information as of March 31, 2019 (The English translation of the “Yukashoken-Houkokusho” for the year ended March 31, 2019) Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Table of Contents Page Cover .......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I Information on the Company .......................................................................................................... 2 1. Overview of the Company ......................................................................................................................... 2 1. Key financial data and trends ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. History .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Description of business ................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Information on subsidiaries and affiliates ..................................................................................................... 7 5. Employees................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Business Overview .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Prewar Japan−Case Study on Nisso Konzern
    FORMATION OF "NEW ZAIBATSU" IN PREWAR Title JAPAN-CASE STUDY ON NISSO KONZERN- Author(s) Shimotani, Masahiro Citation Kyoto University Economic Review (1984), 54(1): 40-59 Issue Date 1984-04 URL https://doi.org/10.11179/ker1926.54.40 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University L'Organisationdu Travail dans Face a !iSociete l"nf~~atique ',<", ' ",' '_ ' ,',_ 'l;. ";'; '. ' Large capitalA~cumulatiOJi,', ~y , ' I.Em~telt'p!isl!S ··~l1j~p~';l~:;:;~S Formation of "New Zaibatsu" in PrewarJiLpl~;.J!Ei THE FA,CULTY OF :\¥;:~~ l":>+Y; ,>', FORMATION OF "NEW ZAIBATSU" IN PREWAR JAPAN -CASE STUDY ON NISSO KONZERN- By Masahiro SHIMOTANI- I Present Situation and Problem.s of the Study on "New Zaibatsu" In the prewar period ofJapanese economy there were 5 corporate groups which were called "New Zaibatsu" or "New Konzerns (Concerns)". They were Nissan, Nitchitsu, Mori, Nisso and Riken groups. The term "New Zaibatsu" was used in contrast with the old "Established Zaibatsu" such as Mitsui, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo and Yasuda. As discussed later, those new Zaibatsu groups had several common features and the most remarkable one of them was in that these groups expanded their influences abruptly in 1930s. It is well-known that Japanese capitalism rapidly proceeded just during 1930s from the quasi-wartime system (starting from Manchuria Incident in 1931) to the wartime system (beginning in Sino-Japanese War, 1937) and developed its munitional industrial­ ization. It is often said that "New Zaibatsu" was those newly developed corporate groups which had increased rapidly their business scales and influences owing to the munitions boom.
    [Show full text]
  • Nissan Motor Co., Ltd
    Financial Information as of March 31, 2012 (The English translation of the “Yukashoken-Houkokusho” for the year ended March 31, 2012) Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Table of Contents Page Cover...........................................................................................................................................................................1 Part I Information on the Company...........................................................................................................2 1. Overview of the Company .........................................................................................................................2 1. Key financial data and trends........................................................................................................................2 2. History ..........................................................................................................................................................4 3. Description of business .................................................................................................................................6 4. Information on subsidiaries and affiliates .....................................................................................................7 5. Employees...................................................................................................................................................13 2. Business Overview ......................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures
    GROUPE RENAULT FACTS & FIGURES March 2018 edition 1801289_ATLAS_RENAULT_2017_GB EXE • VL CONTENTS GROUPE PRODUCTS RENAULT AND BUSINESS 4 / Key figures 46 / Vehicle range 5 / One Group, 5 brands 54 / Powertrain range 6 / Drive the Future 2017 - 2022 56 / Electric vehicles 8 / 2017 Highlights 58 / Light commercial vehicles 9 / 2017 Launches/AVTOVAZ 59 / Motorsport automotive 10 / Highlights for the Eurasia region 61 / Innovation and research 11 / Highlights for the Europe region 64 / Purchasing 12 / Highlights for the Africa, Middle 65 / Supply Chain East, India region 66 / Sales Network 13 / Highlights for the Asia-Pacific 67 / RCI Bank and Services region 68 / After-sales 14 / Highlights for the Americas region 69 / Renault Tech 15 / Structure of the Group/Ownership structure 16 / Financial information RENAULT-NISSAN- 17 / Workforce 18 / Corporate Social Responsibility MITSUBISHI 19 / Milestones, 120 years of history 72 / Presentation – Structure 73 / Highlights 74 / A lever for growth – Synergies MANUFACTURING 75 / Strategic cooperation with Daimler AND SALES 76 / Sales 22 / Industrial sites 24 / Global production 27 / Global sales 30 / Sales in the Europe region 34 / Sales in the Africa, Middle East, India region 36 / Sales in the Eurasia region 39 / Sales in the Asia-Pacific region 41 / Sales in the Americas region Datas are at the end of December 2017. Groupe Renault Facts & Figures / March 2018 edition / 1 1801289_ATLAS_RENAULT_2017_GB EXE • VL GROUPE RENAULT Groupe Renault, a carmaker founded in 1898, is an international multi-brand group that brings together the Renault, Dacia, RSM, Alpine and LADA lines. Present in 134 countries, the Group sold nearly 3.8 million vehicles in 2017, a record year, becoming the world’s leading French vehicle-manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Nissan AR 2002
    Annual Report Year Ended March 31, 2003 2002 Nissan: Enriching people’s lives Contents Vision Nissan: Enriching people’s lives 1 Financial Highlights 2 Letter from the President and CEO Mission 6 Business Overview: Nissan: Once Again Among the Pacesetters Nissan provides unique and innovative automotive 12 Nissan Management Way: Focus on the Quality of Management products and services that deliver superior measurable values to all stakeholders* in alliance with Renault. 14 Products: Success Through New Products *Our stakeholders include customers, shareholders, employees, dealers, 18 Design: Building the Brand with World-Leading Design suppliers, as well as the communities where we work and operate. 20 Technology: Investment for the Future 23 Telematics/IT and ITS: Creating Comfortable, Convenient Driving Fiscal year 2002 saw the launch of the NISSAN 180 24 Environment: Environmental Action Plan three-year business plan. Its result for the first year: 26 Safety: The Quest for Real World Safety operating profit of ¥737 billion, and an industry-leading operating margin of 10.8 percent. Automotive debt was 28 Manufacturing: Building on Top Productivity completely eliminated. Two of the plan’s main goals 31 Purchasing: A Win-Win Relationship were achieved within NISSAN 180’s first year. We’re 32 Sales and Marketing: Moving into Extended Growth pleased to share this news of NISSAN 180’s smooth 37 Sales Financing: Providing Comprehensive Sales Financing Services progress in this Annual Report. As it celebrates its 70th anniversary, Nissan can 38 Corporate Citizenship: Supporting Tomorrow’s Society proudly point to an increasingly strong product 40 Alliance with Renault: Synergies for Growth development capability and much stronger brand 42 Motorsports: Putting Technology to the Test power in its markets around the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 CONTENTS NISSAN MOTOR COMPANY Annual Report 2013 01
    AnnuAl RepoRt 2013 ContentS NISSAN MOTOR COMPANY ANNuAl RePORT 2013 01 contents ContentS This annual report presents the results of Nissan Motor Company's business activities for fiscal 2012. It is also provides an opportunity for investors to deepen their understanding of the Nissan management Viewing this Report team. President and CEO Carlos Ghosn and other executives share their vision of Nissan's philosophy and the direction the company is heading today. this annual report is an interactive pDf. You can use the navigation tabs and buttons to access the information you need. l Section Tabs contents corporate face time management messages 02 vIsION 17 Ev TOPICs click the tabs to jump to the top page of each section. 03 MIssION 18 FIsCAL 2012 sALEs PERFORMANCE 04 kEy FIGuREs 20 FIsCAL 2013 sALEs OuTLOOk l Navigation Buttons l Link Buttons 05 Technology 21 NEW TECHNOLOGIEs IN FIsCAL 2013 go back one page Jump to linked page 06 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTs 22 AWARDs RECEIvED IN FIsCAL 2012 return to previously viewed page Jump to information on the web 23 FIsCAL 2012 FINANCIAL REvIEW 27 FINANCIAL sTATEMENTs go forward one page 09 MEssAGE FROM THE CEO 12 MEssAGE FROM THE COO 14 MEssAGE FROM THE CFO 30 EXECuTIvEs 31 CORPORATE GOvERNANCE ■ Financial Data ■ For further information, please contact: to obtain more detailed financial information, nissan motor co., Ltd. investor relations Department please visit our ir website. 1-1, takashima 1-chome, nishi-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa 16 ABOuT THE MID-TERM PLAN website 220-8686, Japan tel: 81 (0)45-523-5520 ■ this annual report contains forward-looking statements on fax: 81 (0)45-523-5770 nissan’s plans and targets, and related operating investment, e-mail: [email protected] product planning and production targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Nissan Motor Co., Ltd
    Financial Information as of March 31, 2015 (The English translation of the “Yukashoken-Houkokusho” for the year ended March 31, 2015) Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Table of Contents Page Cover ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part I Information on the Company ........................................................................................................... 2 1. Overview of the Company ......................................................................................................................... 2 1. Key financial data and trends ........................................................................................................................ 2 2. History .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Description of business ................................................................................................................................. 6 4. Information on subsidiaries and affiliates ..................................................................................................... 7 5. Employees ................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Business Overview .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]