DOCSLIB.ORG

CINÉMA MILITANT Political Filmmaking & May 1968 Paul Douglas Grant Cinéma Militant

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CINÉMA MILITANT Political Filmmaking & May 1968 Paul Douglas Grant Cinéma Militant CINÉMA MILITANT Political Filmmaking & May 1968 Paul Douglas Grant Cinéma Militant Cinéma Militant Political Filmmaking and May 1968 Paul Douglas Grant WALLFLOWER PRESS LONDON & NEW YORK A Wallflower Press Book Wallflower Press is an imprint of Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex cup.columbia.edu Copyright © 2016 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Wallflower Press® is a registered trademark of Columbia University Press A complete CIP record is available from the Library of Congress ISBN 978-0-231-17666-8 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-231-17667-5 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN 978-0-231-85101-5 (e-book) Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cover design by Elsa Mathern Contents Acknowledgments vii List of Abbreviations viii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 Wildcat Strikes and Wildcat Cinema in May ’68: ARC 7 1.1 What is cinéma militant? 7 1.2 Interrogating the absence 11 1.3 Production eclipsed by theory 13 1.4 Reception in English: Sylvia Harvey’s May ’68 and Film Culture 16 1.5 History in France 19 1.6 The cinema of May 1968 27 Chapter 2 Jean-Pierre Thorn: “No investigation, no right to speak” 35 2.1 Jean-Pierre Thorn and Oser lutter, oser vaincre 35 2.2 The strike at Flins, as told by Jean-Pierre Thorn/Ligne rouge 36 2.3 Ligne rouge 44 2.4 Cinéma Libre 54 2.5 Les établis 58 2.6 La grève des ouvriers de Margoline 61 2.7 Le dos au mur 65 2.8 Georgette Vacher 74 Chapter 3 Cinélutte: “Tout ce qui bouge est rouge” 77 3.1 Cinélutte beginnings 77 3.2 Jusqu’au bout 89 3.3 Petites têtes, grandes surfaces – anatomie d’un supermarché 93 3.4 Bonne chance la France 98 3.5 À pas lentes 110 v Chapter 4 Les groupes Medvedkine: Before and After Chris Marker 119 4.1 The adventure of Les groupes Medvedkine 119 4.2 Medvedkin and the Cine-Train 119 4.3 CCPPO 123 4.4 Two productions by the CCPPO 126 4.5 Le groupe Medvedkine Besançon 131 4.6 Le groupe Medvedkine Sochaux 143 Chapter 5 Of Theory and Peasants: Groupe Cinéthique 151 5.1 Groupe Cinéthique 151 5.2 Le Front Paysan 162 5.3 Les Handicapés méchants and Bon pied bon oeil et toute sa tête 165 Conclusion 173 Notes 177 Filmography 203 Bibliography 211 Index 217 vi Acknowledgments his book could not have been completed without the assistance of the following film- makers, scholars, artists and workers, who were all very generous with their time: Jean- TPierre Thorn, Nicole Brenez, Jacques Kèbadian, Michel Andrieu, Jean-Denis Bonan, Roger Journot, Sebastian Layerle, Richard Copans, Robert Linhart, Nicole Linhart, Leslie Kaplan, Alain Nahum, Guy-Patrick Sainderichin, Jean-Paul Fargier, Gérard Leblanc, Pierre Buraglio, Guy Chapouillé and Front Paysan, Jean-Pierre Olivier de Sardan, Tanguy Perron, Serge Le Péron, Monique Martineau, the people at Ciné-Archives, Forum des images, the Cinémathèque Française, ISKRA, Les Films d’ici, Centre Culturel Populaire de Palente-les Orchamps, Ethan Spigland, the late Paul Ryan, Robert Stam, Dana Polan, Manthia Diawara, David Oubiña, the late Bob Sklar, Richard Porton, Martin Johnson, Dominic Gavin, Jihoon Kim, Priyadarshini Shanker, Greg Zinman, Rebecca Miller and finally my colleagues at the University of San Carlos School of Architecture, Fine Arts and Design for their patience during the writing of this project, especially Misha Anissimov, Joseph Espina, Araceli Culibra and my co-chair in the SAFAD Research Committee, Kimberly Gultia. Special thanks go to Nicolas Dubost, who shared not only his incredible experience as an établi at Renault-Flins, but also his season tickets to PSG. And to Yann Le Masson; truly one of the highlights of this project was getting the chance to meet this incredible militant on his barge in Avignon along with his committed companion Catie, before he passed away in January 2012. Lastly, none of this would have been possible without the support of my family, Maryann Douglas, Andrew and Roberta Grant, Pascale Wettstein, and Malcolm and Sidney Grant. À Pascale, Malou et Sid vii List of Abbreviations ACO Action catholique ouvrière JCR Jeunesse communiste révolutionnaire AFO Association familiale ouvrière LCR Ligue communiste révolutionnaire AOF Afrique Occidentale Française MCF-ML Mouvement communiste français ARC Atelier de recherche cinématographique marxiste–léniniste ATTAC Association pour la taxation des MEDEF Mouvement des enterprises de France transactions financières et pour l’action ML Marxist–Leninist citoyenne MLAC Le mouvement pour la liberté de CCPPO Centre culturel populaire de Palente- l’avortement et de la contraception les-Orchamps MLF Le mouvement de la libération des CERFI Centre d’études de recherches et de femmes formation institutionnelles MLP Mouvement de libération du people CFDT Confédération française démocratique OCI L’Organisation communiste internationale du travail OCT Organisation communiste des travailleurs CNPF Conseil national du patronat française PAIGC Partido Africano da Independência da CoBrA Copenhagen, Brussels and Amsterdam Guiné e Cabo Verde postwar art collective PCF Parti communiste français CPDF Coopérative de production et de PCI Parti communiste internationaliste distribution du film PCR(ml) Parti communiste révolutionnaire CRP Les cinéastes révolutionnaires prolétariens marxiste–léniniste CRS Compagnies républicaines de sécurité PLOCC Palente-Les-Orchamps Centre DEUG Diplôme d’études universitaires Culturel générales PSU Parti socialiste unifié FGERI Fédération des groupes d’études et de SDS Students for a Democratic Society recherches institutionelles SFIO Section française de l’internationale FLN Front de libération nationale ouvrière FRELIMO Frente de Libertação de SLON Société pour le lancement des oeuvres Moçambique nouvelles GONG Groupe d’organisation nationale de la SRF Société des réalisateurs de films Guadeloupe UEC Union des étudiants communistes GP La gauche prolétarienne UJCML Union des jeunesses communistes IDHEC L’Institut des hautes études marxistes–léninistes cinématographiques UNCAL Union nationale des comités d’action ISKRA Image, son, kinescope et réalisations lycéens audiovisuelles UPCB L’Unité de production cinéma Bretagne viii Introduction1 n the 74th issue of the French film journal Écran, Guy Hennebelle opened his column, “La vie est à nous”, with “As you read this the Third Assembly ofCinéma Militant (excuse I me: ‘multimedia of social and political intervention’ [l’audiovisuel d’intervention sociale et politique]) has already taken place […] What is the future of this cinema we call militant? Is it destined to disappear or will it renew itself?”2 The issue of Écran marked the tenth anniversary of the political upheaval in France during May 1968, and thus this somewhat mournful reflection was not entirely misplaced; in fact, the text pointed to a number of issues that had to some extent plagued this “cinéma dit militant” from its inception. For instance, did this filmmaking tradition have any future outside the immediate political context of May? Was the term cinéma militant the most appropriate description of this cultural practice? And how could this cinema reach a wider audience while still remaining faithful to the political context that gave rise to it? Yet these questions were posed from within the milieu, addressing those filmmakers, theo- rists and militants of many stripes who had been wrestling with these issues in their film prac- tice for at least a decade. However, for those not on familiar terms with cinéma militant, it was perhaps premature to begin mourning its possible death. It would seem, rather, that in order to articulate cinéma militant’s history, its aims, its aesthetic strategies and its potentials, it would be necessary to open the floor to some preliminary questions, particularly the question as to what exactly constituted this cinematic practice. Were there aesthetic similarities, political affini- ties, and organisational and production strategies which all aligned to give a discrete picture of cinéma militant? These are the questions that this book attempts to address, those nascent questions at the heart of a practice that remained strangely outside the purview of historians of cinema and radical politics alike. Pascale Casanova remarked that Paris had long been “La République mondiale des lettres”, but throughout the late 1960s and 1970s it was equally the capital of the “République mondiale du cinéma révolutionnaire”. This book examines the French tradition of cinéma militant, which flourished during the immediate aftermath of the events of May 1968, producing a wide range of film work from underrepresented populations that included such varied groups as entry-level factory workers (ouvriers spécialisés, or OS), highly theoretical Marxist–Leninist collectives, and even the militant special needs community. Counteracting the dearth of attention paid to these 1 militant film practices, which grew out of concrete historical circumstances, this book explores the diverse, culturally conditioned currents of militant aesthetics and theory that these practices absorbed and produced. With the waning of Les trente glorieuses3 and the political events that occurred in France during May and June of 1968, French cinema participated in a political transformation that has traditionally been narrated along a specific and seemingly immutable axis. The common narra- tive, as it is formulated in Anglophone film studies, articulates the unfolding of the events in relation to cinema as beginning with the Langlois affair. André Malraux, the minister of cultural affairs under President Charles de Gaulle in 1968, wanted to remove Henri Langlois, who was among the founders of the Cinémathèque Française, as the director of the cinémathèque. The reasons given were largely about Langlois’s careless handling of the archival material, and his political intransigency with regard to running the cinémathèque, and in February 1968 he was asked to step down.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    IRSH 48 (2003), pp. 301–333 DOI: 10.1017/S0020859003001056 # 2003 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis BIBLIOGRAPHY General Issues SOCIAL THEORY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE Herod,Andrew. Labor Geographies. Workers and the Landscapes of Capitalism. [Perspectives on Economic Change.] The Guilford Press, New York [etc.] 2001. xvi, 352 pp. Ill. £18.95. In this book, based in part on previously published work, Professor Herod aims to provide a comprehensive introduction to the recently developing discipline of labour geography. Combining more theoretical analysis of what labour geography encompasses with a number of more empirical case studies, the author explores the spatial contexts and scales in which workers address particular economic and political problems they encounter under capitalism. The work includes case studies of the reaction of American dockworkers to the process of containerization; the role of US labour in globalization; and US labour’s role in local social engineering in Latin America in the context of Cold-War anti- communism. Rachwa,Tadeusz. Labours of the Mind. Labour in the Culture of Production. [Literary and Cultural Theory, vol. 8.] Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main [etc.] 2001. 165 pp. S.fr. 44.00. Using the tools of literary and cultural theory, in this study Professor Rachwa examines how notions of labour and production have helped shape human subject and identity in European culture. Analysing a number of conceptualizations of culture, he assesses how labour and production, explicitly or implicitly, become principles in the evaluation of cultures, as well as powerful tools for the ideological constitution and reconstruction of social space. Walker,David M. Marx, Methodology and Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Communists, State and Civil Society in Colonial Algeria, 1945-1954
    Orient-Institut Studies 1 (2012) – Rethinking Totalitarianism and its Arab Readings Allison Drew Communists, State and Civil Society in Colonial Algeria, 1945-1954 <1> The association of communism and totalitarianism became axiomatic at the height of the Cold War, premised on the idea that communist regimes used ideology to mobilize the masses and combined ideology with coercion to subsume all elements of civil society under state control. Discussions of the relationship between communism and totalitarianism focused on countries in which communist movements gained control of sovereign states. However, any potential relationship between communist parties and sovereign states cannot be generalized to colonized societies. <2> The colonial state in Algeria, as elsewhere in Africa, maintained itself through a combination of direct force and indirect rule over the indigenous majority, allowing political rights for the minority designated as French citizens. The anti-colonial struggle shaped itself around this political reality. The Algerian experience suggests that communist parties seeking to embed themselves in anti-colonial struggles – civil-society- based movements against colonial rule − develop an antagonistic political relationship to the colonial state that forms their understanding of and commitment to both collective and individual democratic rights. The analysis of communist movements and state- society relations, therefore, must be placed within the historical context in which communist movements emerge and operate in relationship to the state and cannot be understood solely by reference to political ideology.1 <3> Communism is intrinsically concerned with the collective right of classes, namely the proletariat and the peasantry, to be free of exploitation. Yet Communists have all too often struggled to recognize the collective rights of oppressed nations to self- determination.
    [Show full text]
  • Boycott Elections!" Some Lessons of Recent History
    "Boycott Elections!" Some Lessons of Recent History SATYA GHOSH [Translated from the Bengali text (slightly revised), which appeared in Deshabrati, October 31, 1968. Much of the material of this article is taken from Jacques Jurquet's "Revisionism in France", reprinted in World Revolution, Vol. I, No. 3, from L'Humanite Nouvelle, and Jen Li- Hsin's "A Reactionary Capitulationist Programme," that was published in Peking Review, November 17, 1967.] [This translation from the Bengali original appeared in Liberation, Vol. II, No. 3 (January 1969). One may read also "The Bankruptcy of China's Devotee of Parliament," another article on a similar subject, published in this volume]. France provides a striking example demonstrating how a revolutionary mass movement can be disrupted once the people are deceitfully persuaded to give up armed struggle and walk into the blind alley of parliamentary elections. I am not referring to the revolutionary upsurge which took place in that country in May this year and the subsequent fraudulent bourgeois elections there. What I refer to is the sequence of events which happened there 23 years ago, and to which the Chinese comrades have pointedly drawn the attention of all Marxist-Leninists. We, the Communist revolutionaries of India, must today study the events that took place in France and in Italy in order that we may successfully fight the deceitful tactics of our own revisionists and neo- revisionists, who, while fraudulently mouthing revolutionary phrases, shamelessly participate in bourgeois elections and even compete with the ruling Congress Party and the other reactionary political parties in singing the praises of the so-called parliamentary democracy in India, devised and imposed by the British imperialists to preserve and protect the imperialist-feudal interests in this country.
    [Show full text]
  • Une Diplomatie Réaliste Dans Le Cadre De La Guerre Froide – Nouvelle Recherche Sur L’Histoire Des Relations Sino-Françaises (1949-1969) Jiayi Gao
    Une diplomatie réaliste dans le cadre de la Guerre froide – nouvelle recherche sur l’histoire des relations sino-françaises (1949-1969) Jiayi Gao To cite this version: Jiayi Gao. Une diplomatie réaliste dans le cadre de la Guerre froide – nouvelle recherche sur l’histoire des relations sino-françaises (1949-1969). Histoire. École normale supérieure de Cachan - ENS Cachan, 2015. Français. NNT : 2015DENS0017. tel-01315174 HAL Id: tel-01315174 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01315174 Submitted on 17 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ENSC- 2015-N°576 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE DE CACHAN Présentée par Madame GAO Jiayi pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’ECOLE NORMALE SUPERIEURE DE CACHAN Domaine : SCIENCES SOCIALES/PHILOSOPHIE/ART Sujet de la thèse : Une diplomatie réaliste dans le cadre de la Guerre froide – nouvelle recherche sur l’histoire des relations sino-françaises (1949-1969) Thèse présentée et soutenue à Shanghai le 04 juin 2015 devant le jury composé de : Pan Guang professeur Président, rapporteur Philippe Buton professeur Rapporteur Pan Xingming professeur Examinateur Yu Weimin professeur Examinateur Dai Chaowu professeur Examinateur Olivier Wieviorka professeur Directeur de thèse Shen Zhihua professeur Directeur de thèse Nom du Laboratoire ……ISP………… ENS CACHAN/CNRS/UMR ……….
    [Show full text]
  • From Anti-Imperialism to Human Rights: the Vietnam War and Radical Internationalism in the 1960S and 1970S
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 From Anti-Imperialism To Human Rights: The Vietnam War And Radical Internationalism In The 1960s And 1970s Salar Mohandesi University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the European History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Mohandesi, Salar, "From Anti-Imperialism To Human Rights: The Vietnam War And Radical Internationalism In The 1960s And 1970s" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2478. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2478 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2478 For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Anti-Imperialism To Human Rights: The Vietnam War And Radical Internationalism In The 1960s And 1970s Abstract This dissertation explores changing forms of internationalism among the French and U.S. radical left from the 1960s through the late 1970s. In the 1960s, Vietnamese resistance to U.S. imperialism inspired French activists to forge an international antiwar alliance with U.S. activists opposing their government’s aggression. Together, they created a form of anti-imperialist internationalism based on the right of nations to self-determination. Despite transnational protest, the United States escalated the war, leading many activists to argue that the best way to aid Vietnamese national liberation was to translate that struggle into their own domestic contexts. In so doing, they triggered a wave of upheaval that reached new heights in May 1968. But when this anti-imperialist front faced repression and imprisonment in France and the United States, these same radicals began to advance individual rights alongside anti- imperialist revolution in the early 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • 'La Question': Torture, Memory and Narrative In
    Le Retour de ‘La Question’: Torture, memory and narrative in contemporary French literature by Maria Vendetti A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in French in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge Professor Thoraya Tlatli Professor Debarati Sanyal Professor Stefania Pandolfo Fall 2013 Abstract “Le retour de ‘La Question’: torture, memory, and narrative in contemporary French literature” by Maria Vendetti Doctor of Philosophy in French University of California, Berkeley Professor Thoraya Tlatli, Chair This dissertation examines, through literary and testimonial texts, the transmission and dissemination of narratives about torture that took place during the Algerian War of Independence. Fictional depictions of limit experiences such as torture are deeply rooted in discourses about remembering and forgetting. I argue that the frequently used term “open secret” is a misnomer which is taken up in literature in order to be critiqued through narrative fragmentation and shifting generic frames. My project is interdisciplinary, and studies literary and anthropological discussions of torture as both a politicized and sexualized system. I address the problem of representing torture and raise questions about the status of historiography and its place within French, Algerian, and trans-Mediterranean discourses. My first chapter, “Histories repeating,” examines how and why fictional accounts of torture and its aftermath tend to deliberately conflate and intertwine various historical periods. Making individual memories of physical violence the subject of fiction, the authors I discuss narrativize the historical reality of torture in order to illustrate the longue durée and endless repeatability of violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Julia Buck ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    © 2021 Julia Buck ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MAKING THE RESISTANCE FRENCH: BUREAUCRACY, MEMORY, AND SPACE IN POSTWAR MARSEILLE By JULIA A. BUCK A dissertation submitted to tHe School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of tHe requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Judith Surkis And approved by ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ ___________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2021 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Making the Resistance FrencH: Bureaucracy, Memory, and Space in Postwar Marseille by Julia A. Buck Dissertation Director: Judith Surkis This dissertation examines postwar state recognition of resistance during the Second World War in France from below and tHe margins. It focuses on the postwar commemorative politics regarding tHe resistance and liberation of tHe Mediterranean port city of Marseille, a place with a long history of challenging FrencH universalist claims. To understand how state power and national belonging was instantiated locally, I analyze the bureaucracy that arose in postwar France from laws establisHing an official definition of resistance as well as a formal process for applicants to prove past involvement in wartime underground movements tHat left virtually no records of membership. One such category was the combattant volontaire de la Résistance (CVR). The resulting bureaucratic encounters also played an important, if ambivalent, role in tHe consolidation of state power during tHe Cold War and decolonization, as a means of bringing local commemorative cultures in line witH dominant FrencH narratives and coopting potentially threatening political actors. However, instead of putting commemorative conflict to rest, tHe state opened up a new battlefield regarding tHe memory of anti-Nazi resistance both within and in rejection of the applications for official recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shanghai Commune, French Maoism & the Case of Alain Badiou
    Copyright @ 2017 Australia and New Zealand Journal of European Studies https://cesaa.org.au/anzjes/ Vol9 (3) ISSN 1837-2147 (Print) ISSN 1836-1803 (On-line) Robert Boncardo The University of Sydney [email protected] Bryan Cooke University of Melbourne [email protected] 1967: The Shanghai Commune, French Maoism & the Case of Alain Badiou Abstract Alain Badiou’s Maoism has long been the subject of controversy. In this paper, we approach the topic of Badiou’s Maoism by way of the references he and his erstwhile Maoist group, the UCFML, made to the 1967 Shanghai Commune. We argue that Badiou and the UCFML’s invocations of Mao and Mao’s writings are subordinate to their interpretation of the political stakes of the Shanghai Commune as a privileged episode in the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. We proceed by comparing Badiou and the UCFML to two of the most prominent French Maoist groups, the PCMLF and the GP, before situating Badiou’s use of Mao’s name within the conceptual terms of his 1982 work Theory of the Subject. Keywords: Alain Badiou; Cultural Revolution; French Maoism; Mao Tse-tung; politics; Theory of the Subject In addition to being one of the world’s most celebrated contemporary philosophers, Alain Badiou is infamous for his fidelity to Maoism, a political movement he actively participated in for well over a decade and which remains a constant reference point in his later work. 1 A number of invectives, polemics, expressions of incredulity and hagiographic defences have been devoted to this topic in recent years.
    [Show full text]