DOCSLIB.ORG

November 1995/ $1.5 Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 1995/ $1.5 Pennsylvania November 1995/ $1.5 Pennsylvania *-* % .A V4E v «^^«» < •*.*# \ ' :W In April 1992, the Fish and Boat Com­ mission awarded the Ralph W. Abele Con­ StmigkiQalk servation Heritage Award to Dr. Maurice K. Goddard for "a lifetime of service to con­ servation of the environment in Pennsylvania and our nation." Dr. Maurice K. Goddard: In response, Doc shared some of his phi­ A Giant Among Conservationists losophy of government and reminisced about his friendship with Ralph Abele. Doc re­ minded us that in government, bigger is not necessarily better, and he urged preserva­ 1 had the opportunity and honor of meeting Dr. Goddard at several Corps of Engineers tion of the Fish and Boat Commission as meetings in the early 1970s when he was a small, independent agency focused on fish the Secretary of the Department of Envi­ and boating. Peter A. Colangelo "When you get yourself involved in a big ronmental Resources. More recently, I had Executive Director the pleasure of talking to him at former Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission conglomerate, you certainly lose stature," Executive Director Ed Miller's retirement he concluded. Doc had always urged that dinner in the spring of ] 994 and then again servation in Pennsylvania. His record of the Department of Environmental Services while .serving with him i ») llie Ralph W. Abele selfless public service in the cause of con­ be split into smaller, more focused agen­ Conservation Scholarship Fund Board in May servation and protection of the environment cies, and lie lived to see it happen with the of this year. He was someone who I ad­ is unmatched and, probably, unmatchable. creation of the new Department of Environ­ mired and respected greatly. Everyone in Doc Goddard served as the last Secre­ mental Protection and the Department of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commis­ tary of the Department of Forests and Wa­ Conservation and Natural Resources. sion was saddened to learn of his death. Dr. ters (1955 - 1971) and the first Secretary He reminisced that he got to know Ralph Goddard was a true friend of the sportsmen of the Department of Environmental Re­ Abele during the campaigns for the Project of Pennsylvania. As Larry Schweiger wrote, sources (1971 - 1979). Doc Goddard's 70 and Project 500 bond issues. He told "There is not a single Pennsylvanian who dedicated efforts on behalf of conservation his listeners that "with Ralph's leadership, does not enjoy the benefits of Goddard's touch everyone who fishes and boats in Penn­ the Fish Commission was the environmental work." sylvania. He had a vision of a network of conscience for the environment in Pennsyl­ The following is an article on Dr. Goddard state parks to provide outdoor recreation and vania." He related that he was greatly honored prepared by Dennis Guise, our Deputy Ex­ enjoyment within 25 miles of every citizen to receive an award named for Ralph Abele. ecutive Director/Chief Counsel. I asked Den­ in the Commonwealth. Pennsylvania's state Doc Goddard, Ralph Abele and Ken Sink nis to prepare it so we could dedicate it for park system, with 114 state parks, stands helped form an informal group of conser­ this "Straight Talk" since Dennis was most as a perpetual legacy of Doc Goddard and vation leaders known affectionately as the familiar with Dr. Goddard's many accom­ his work. "OB's." They would get together at a camp plishments. Doc Goddard was the moving force be­ and focus on the big questions of right and hind Pennsylvania's two great conservation wrong that sometimes get obscured in the On September 14, 1995, Dr. Maurice K. bond issues: Project 70 and Project 500. details of deadlines and daily decisions. Out Goddard died from injuries received in a Through his untiring efforts, these bond issues of their discussions came a sense of direc­ fire at his home. He was 83 years old. were approved by the voters to allocate $570 tion and a vision for the better protection Doc Goddard's death marked the end of million for conservation in Pennsylvania. of Pennsylvania's precious resources. If the an era. Pennsylvania's anglers and boat­ Much of that money was used to provide streets of heaven are paved with gold, then ers and all who love the outdoors lost a true fishing and boating opportunities for present let's hope there's no runoff of heavy met­ friend. Doc Goddard was a giant of con- and future generations of Pennsylvanians. als to the heavenly waters or Somebody up Odds are that every Pennsylvania angler has there may hear about it from the OB's: Doc, wetted a line in, and every Pennsylvania Ralph and Ken. boater has launched a boat on, waters pre­ We will remember Doc Goddard for his served through Doc Goddard's efforts. good humor, his great knowledge and his Doc Goddard had a close and abiding profound mission. We will remember him friendship with Ralph Abele, the late ex­ when we hear of the Goddard Chair at the ecutive director of the Pennsylvania Fish Perm State School of Forestry or the Maurice Commission. Ralph awarded Doc one of K. Goddard State Park. We will remem­ the first "White Hats" that the Commission ber him when we paddle a state park lake, awarded to the "Good Guys" in the conser­ fish in a stream bought with Project 70 funds vation movement. When Ralph retired in and enjoy the wonders of our state forests. May 1987, Doc returned the favor by sur­ Doc Goddard left his mark on all who knew prising Ralph with a White Hat of his own. him and the world around him. After Ralph's untimely death in 1990, Doc When Dwight Eisenhower, with whom Goddard assumed a leadership role in the Doc served in World War II, bought his farm Ralph W. Abele Conservation Scholarship at Gettysburg, he said his goal was "to leave Fund. Doc came to every meeting of the the place better than he found it." Of Maurice board, and he led the Fund's effort to pub­ Goddard it can truly be said that he left Penn­ Dr. Maurice K. Goddard (left) lish the collection of Ralph's "Straight Talk" sylvania better than he found it and that his and Ralph W. Ahele columns. dedication to conservation has been an in­ spiration for us all. 2 November 1995 Pennsylvania Angler ania November 1995 Vol. 64 No. 11 & Boat Commission Howard E. Pflugfelder President Pennsylv i . New Cumberland Donald N. Lacy Vice President ANGLER Reading The Keystone State's Official Fishimg Magazine ^^ Donald K. Anderson Meyersdale Samuel M. Concilia November Panfish in Eastern PA by Vic Attardo 4 North East Ross J. Huhn Catching Trout in Not-Quite-Frozen Lakes by Mike Bleech 7 Saltsburg Paul J. Mahon Clarks Green PAAngler NET WORK 11 Enoch S. "Inky " Moore, Jr. Newville On the Water with Ken Salkowski 14 Leon Reed Honesdale William J. Sabatose North Coast Steelhead by Darl Black 15 Brockport 7. Wayne Yorks Benton The Orange Flash: A Streamer for Bass by Chauncy K. Lively 19 Boa Gary Miles Hatch Basics by Charles R. Meek 21 Chairman North East Gary Babin Delaware River Striped Bass by Vic Attardo 25 Lancaster Clayton Buchanan SMART Angler's Notebook^ Carl Richardson 31 Pittsburgh Thaddeus Piotrowski Bloomsburg This issue 's front-cover bluegill was photographed by Wally Eberhart. Vincent P. Riggi Clarks Summit Muskies! Ex Officio members: "This past spring we had a pretty good year trap-netting for muskies," says Ron Peter A. Colangelo, Executive Director; Lee, Commission Area 2 Fisheries Manager. We found good numbers and quality John F. Simmons, Director, Bureau of Boating; sizes of muskies in several lakes." John C. Oliver, Acting Secretary, Department of Lee says that the Commission's Tamarack Lake was the most productive musky Conservation and Natural Resources lake. Lee and Fisheries Technician Al Woomer netted 41 muskies that ranged in size from 24 inches to 46 inches. Ten of those fish were over 40 inches long. All Editor—Art Michaels the muskies were purebred-that's what the Commission stocks as fingerlings there. Editorial Assistant—Chadene Seifert The Crawford County lake is 562 acres. It was scheduled to be drawn down in October, Art Director— Ted Walke so the fish are concentrated. Circulation—Eleanor Mutch "Conneaut Lake, Crawford County, was another solid producer," Lee says. "We Circulation—Patti Copp sampled seven muskies there in sizes from 36 to 47 inches. Four of those fish were over 40 inches. Staff Assistant—Rose Ann Bartal "In Tionesta Lake we netted four muskies that were 34,44,46 and 48 inches. We Staff Assistant—Nita Lynch also trapped a 5-pound+ smallmouth bass there that was the largest smallmouth I've mtributors ever seen in my 20-something years with the Commission. There are quite a few Darl Black smallmouths in Tionesta and in Conneaut, and they're nice-sized." Mike Bleech Lee says that in Woodcock Creek Lake he netted 27 muskies. Five were bigger Charles R. Meek than 42 inches, and the three largest were 44, 46 and 47+ inches. Vic Attardo "Union City Fish Culture Station personnel netted 50 muskies in Edinboro Lake, Pennsylvania Angler (ISSN0031-434X) is published monthly by Che Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission, 3532 Walnul Street, Harrisburg, PA 17109. ©1995. and two were over 45 inches," says Lee. "Canadohta and Sugar lakes also produced "thing in this magazine may be reprinted without the written permission of the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission. Subscription rates: one year, S9; three nice muskies. They trapped 50 in Sugar, a Commission lake. There were no fish years, $25; single copies are $ 1.50 each.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blackstone River Watershed 2008 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Bioassessment
    Technical Memorandum CN 325.2 BLACKSTONE RIVER WATERSHED 2008 BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENT Peter Mitchell Division of Watershed Management Watershed Planning Program Worcester, MA January, 2014 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Kenneth L. Kimmell, Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Bethany A. Card, Assistant Commissioner (This page intentionally left blank) Contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................................1 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................................1 Macroinvertebrate Sampling - RBPIII..........................................................................................................1 Macroinvertebrate Sample Processing and Data Analysis .........................................................................4 Habitat Assessment.....................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................6 SUMMARY....................................................................................................................................................10 LITERATURE
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project
    MERAMEC RIVER WATERSHED DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Funded by: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency prepared by: Todd J. Blanc Fisheries Biologist Missouri Department of Conservation Sullivan, Missouri and Mark Caldwell and Michelle Hawks Fisheries GIS Specialist and GIS Analyst Missouri Department of Conservation Columbia, Missouri November 1998 Contributors include: Andrew Austin, Ronald Burke, George Kromrey, Kevin Meneau, Michael Smith, John Stanovick, Richard Wehnes Reviewers and other contributors include: Sue Bruenderman, Kenda Flores, Marlyn Miller, Robert Pulliam, Lynn Schrader, William Turner, Kevin Richards, Matt Winston For additional information contact East Central Regional Fisheries Staff P.O. Box 248 Sullivan, MO 63080 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Project Overview The overall purpose of the Meramec River Watershed Demonstration Project is to bring together relevant information about the Meramec River basin and evaluate the status of the stream, watershed, and wetland resource base. The project has three primary objectives, which have been met. The objectives are: 1) Prepare an inventory of the Meramec River basin to provide background information about past and present conditions. 2) Facilitate the reduction of riparian wetland losses through identification of priority areas for protection and management. 3) Identify potential partners and programs to assist citizens in selecting approaches to the management of the Meramec River system. These objectives are dealt with in the following sections titled Inventory, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Analyses, and Action Plan. Inventory The Meramec River basin is located in east central Missouri in Crawford, Dent, Franklin, Iron, Jefferson, Phelps, Reynolds, St. Louis, Texas, and Washington counties. Found in the northeast corner of the Ozark Highlands, the Meramec River and its tributaries drain 2,149 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Invertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas
    Protocol for Monitoring Aquatic Invertebrates at Ozark National Scenic Riverways, Missouri, and Buffalo National River, Arkansas. Heartland I&M Network SOP 4: Laboratory Processing and Identification of Invertebrates Version 1.2 (03/11/2021) Revision History Log: Previous Revision Author Changes Made Reason for Change New Version # Date Version # Dec 2, 2016 Bowles References updates References were 1.0 1.1 insufficient 1.1 3/11/2021 HR Dodd QA/QC procedures and Clarify QA procedures and 1.2 certification process increase data integrity of clarified; sample sample processing and processing and identification identification methods clarified This SOP explains procedures for processing and storing samples after field collection as well as identification of specimens. Procedures for storing reference specimens are also described. I. Preparing the Sample for Processing Processing procedures apply to all benthic samples. This is an important and time-consuming step. Particular care should be taken to ensure that samples are being processed thoroughly and efficiently. The purpose of sorting is to remove invertebrates from other material in the sample. Procedure: A. Sample processing begins by pouring the original field sample into a USGS standard sieve (500-µm) placed in a catch pan. The preservative that is drained from the sample should be placed back in the original sample container for eventual rehydration of remaining sample debris that is not sorted during the subsample procedure described below. B. Rinse the sample contents in the sieve with tap water to flush the residual preservative. Large debris material (>2 cm; i.e. leaves, sticks, rocks) should be removed by hand and rinsed into the sieve.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Mayfly Species in North America List Compiled from Randolph, Robert Patrick
    Page 1 of 19 Distribution of mayfly species in North America List compiled from Randolph, Robert Patrick. 2002. Atlas and biogeographic review of the North American mayflies (Ephemeroptera). PhD Dissertation, Department of Entomology, Purdue University. 514 pages and information presented at Xerces Mayfly Festival, Moscow, Idaho June, 9-12 2005 Acanthametropodidae Ameletus ludens Needham Acanthametropus pecatonica (Burks) Canada—ON,NS,PQ. USA—IL,GA,SC,WI. USA—CT,IN,KY,ME,MO,NY,OH,PA,WV. Ameletus majusculus Zloty Analetris eximia Edmunds Canada—AB. Canada—AB ,SA. USA—MT,OR,WA. USA—UT,WY. Ameletus minimus Zloty & Harper USA—OR. Ameletidae Ameletus oregonenesis McDunnough Ameletus amador Mayo Canada—AB ,BC,SA. Canada—AB. USA—ID,MT,OR,UT. USA—CA,OR. Ameletus pritchardi Zloty Ameletus andersoni Mayo Canada—AB,BC. USA—OR,WA. Ameletus quadratus Zloty & Harper Ameletus bellulus Zloty USA—OR. Canada—AB. Ameletus shepherdi Traver USA—MT. Canada—BC. Ameletus browni McDunnough USA—CA,MT,OR. Canada—PQ Ameletus similior McDunnough USA—ME,PA,VT. Canada—AB,BC. Ameletus celer McDunnough USA—CO,ID,MT,OR,UT Canada—AB ,BC. Ameletus sparsatus McDunnough USA—CO,ID,MT,UT Canada—AB,BC,NWT. Ameletus cooki McDunnough USA—AZ,CO,ID,MT,NM,OR Canada—AB,BC. Ameletus subnotatus Eaton USA—CO,ID,MT,OR,WA. Canada—AB,BC,MB,NB,NF,ON,PQ. Ameletus cryptostimulus Carle USA—CO,UT,WY. USA—NC,NY,PA,SC,TN,VA,VT,WV. Ameletus suffusus McDunnough Ameletus dissitus Eaton Canada—AB,BC. USA—CA,OR. USA—ID,OR. Ameletus doddsianus Zloty Ameletus tarteri Burrows USA—AZ,CO,NM,NV,UT.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    Prepared by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Assistance from Conservation Partners Natural Resources Board Approved August 2005 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Acceptance September 2005 Wisconsin’s Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Governor Jim Doyle Natural Resources Board Gerald M. O’Brien, Chair Howard D. Poulson, Vice-Chair Jonathan P Ela, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Christine L. Thomas John W. Welter Stephen D. Willet Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Scott Hassett, Secretary Laurie Osterndorf, Division Administrator, Land Paul DeLong, Division Administrator, Forestry Todd Ambs, Division Administrator, Water Amy Smith, Division Administrator, Enforcement and Science Recommended Citation: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2005. Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Madison, WI. “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” – John Muir The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Endangered Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or call (608) 266-7012 for copies of this report. Pub-ER-641 2005
    [Show full text]
  • The Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of Tennessee, with a Review of the Possibly Threatened Species Occurring Within the State
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by ValpoScholar The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 29 Number 4 - Summer 1996 Number 4 - Summer Article 1 1996 December 1996 The Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of Tennessee, With a Review of the Possibly Threatened Species Occurring Within the State L. S. Long Aquatic Resources Center B. C. Kondratieff Colorado State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Long, L. S. and Kondratieff, B. C. 1996. "The Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of Tennessee, With a Review of the Possibly Threatened Species Occurring Within the State," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 29 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol29/iss4/1 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Long and Kondratieff: The Mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of Tennessee, With a Review of the P 1996 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 171 THE MAYFLIES (EPHEMEROPTERA) OF TENNESSEE, WITH A REVIEW OF THE POSSIBLY THREATENED SPECIES OCCURRING WITHIN THE STATE l. S. Long 1 and B. C. Kondratieff2 ABSTRACT One hundred and forty-three species of mayflies are reported from the state of Tennessee. Sixteen species (Ameletus cryptostimuZus, Choroterpes basalis, Baetis virile, Ephemera blanda, E. simulans, Ephemerella berneri, Heterocloeon curiosum, H. petersi, Labiobaetis ephippiatus, Leptophlebia bradleyi, Macdunnoa brunnea, Paraleptophlebia assimilis, P. debilis, P.
    [Show full text]
  • A DNA Barcode Library for North American Ephemeroptera: Progress and Prospects
    A DNA Barcode Library for North American Ephemeroptera: Progress and Prospects Jeffrey M. Webb1*, Luke M. Jacobus2, David H. Funk3, Xin Zhou4, Boris Kondratieff5, Christy J. Geraci6,R. Edward DeWalt7, Donald J. Baird8, Barton Richard9, Iain Phillips10, Paul D. N. Hebert1 1 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 2 Division of Science, Indiana University Purdue University Columbus, Columbus, Indiana, United States of America, 3 Stroud Water Research Center, Avondale, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 4 BGI, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China, 5 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America, 6 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., United States of America, 7 Prairie Research Institute, Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America, 8 Environment Canada, Canadian Rivers Institute, Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 9 Laboratory of Aquatic Entomology, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America, 10 Saskatchewan Watershed Authority, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada Abstract DNA barcoding of aquatic macroinvertebrates holds much promise as a tool for taxonomic research and for providing the reliable identifications needed for water quality assessment programs. A prerequisite for identification using barcodes is a reliable reference library. We gathered 4165 sequences from the barcode region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene representing 264 nominal and 90 provisional species of mayflies (Insecta: Ephemeroptera) from Canada, Mexico, and the United States. No species shared barcode sequences and all can be identified with barcodes with the possible exception of some Caenis.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Headwaters: the SCIENTIFIC BASIS for SAFEGUARDING STREAM and RIVER ECOSYSTEMS
    Protecting Headwaters: THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR SAFEGUARDING STREAM AND RIVER ECOSYSTEMS A Research Synthesis from the Stroud™ Water Research Center Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. About THE STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER The Stroud Water Research Center seeks to advance knowledge and stewardship of fresh water through research, education and global outreach and to help businesses, landowners, policy makers and individuals make informed decisions that affect water quality and availability around the world. The Stroud Water Research Center is an independent, 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization. For more information go to www.stroudcenter.org. Sierra Club provided partial support for writing this white paper. Editing and executive summary by Matt Freeman. Contributors STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER SCIENTISTS AUTHORED PROTECTING HEADWATERS Louis A. Kaplan Senior Research Scientist Thomas L. Bott Vice President Senior Research Scientist John K. Jackson Senior Research Scientist J. Denis Newbold Research Scientist Bernard W. Sweeney Director President Senior Research Scientist For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of this document go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters.pdf. For a downloadable, printer-ready copy of the Executive Summary only, go to: http://www.stroudcenter.org/research/PDF/ProtectingHeadwaters_ExecSummary.pdf. 1 STROUD WATER RESEARCH CENTER | PROTECTING HEADWATERS Small headwater streams like this one are the lifeblood of our streams and rivers. Protecting these headwaters is essential to preserving a healthy freshwater ecosystem and protecting our freshwater resources. Executive Summary HEALTHY HEADWATERS ARE ESSENTIAL TO PRESERVE OUR FRESHWATER RESOURCES Scientific evidence clearly shows that healthy headwaters — tributary streams, intermittent streams, and spring seeps — are essential to the health of stream and river ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Owasco Lake Inlet, 2011
    New York State DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Division of Water Owasco Lake Inlet Biological Assessment 2011 Survey New York State Department of Environmental Conservation BIOLOGICAL STREAM ASSESSMENT Owasco Lake Inlet Tompkins and Cayuga Counties, New York Seneca-Oneida-Oswego River Basin Survey date: June 28, 2011 Report date: October 1, 2012 Alexander J. Smith Brian Duffy Diana L. Heitzman Jeff Lojpersberger Margaret A. Novak Stream Biomonitoring Unit Bureau of Water Assessment and Management Division of Water NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Albany, New York Table of Contents Background..................................................................................................................................... 1 Results and Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 1 Discussion....................................................................................................................................... 2 Literature Cited ............................................................................................................................... 5 Table 1. Station locations................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 1. Overview map ................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 1a. Site location map, station 01. ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Austropotamobius Pallipes
    THÈSE Pour l'obtention du grade de DOCTEUR DE L'UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS École nationale supérieure d'ingénieurs (Poitiers) Institut de chimie des milieux et matériaux de Poitiers - IC2MP (Diplôme National - Arrêté du 7 août 2006) École doctorale : Sciences pour l'environnement - Gay Lussac Secteur de recherche : Chimie et microbiologie de l'eau Présentée par : Joëlle Jandry Proposition d'indicateurs de la qualité du milieu pour la préservation et la réintroduction d'Austropotamobius pallipes : éphémères et matière organique Directeur(s) de Thèse : Frédéric Grandjean, Jérôme Labanowski Soutenue le 14 décembre 2012 devant le jury Jury : Président Naim Ouaini Professeur, Université Saint Esprit de Kaslik, Liban Rapporteur Julian D. Reynolds Professor, University of Dublin, Ireland Rapporteur Stéphane Mounier Professeur des Universités, Université de Toulon Membre Frédéric Grandjean Professeur des Universités, Université de Poitiers Membre Jérôme Labanowski Chargé de recherche CNRS, Université de Poitiers Membre Claude Daou Maître de conférences, Université Saint Esprit de Kaslik, Liban Pour citer cette thèse : Joëlle Jandry. Proposition d'indicateurs de la qualité du milieu pour la préservation et la réintroduction d'Austropotamobius pallipes : éphémères et matière organique [En ligne]. Thèse Chimie et microbiologie de l'eau. Poitiers : Université de Poitiers, 2012. Disponible sur Internet <http://theses.univ-poitiers.fr> THESE Pour l’obtention du Grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE DE POITIERS (ECOLE NATIONALE SUPERIEURE d’INGENIEURS de POITIERS) (Diplôme National - Arrêté du 7 août 2006) Ecole Doctorale : Sciences pour l'environnement GAY LUSSAC ED n°523 Secteur de Recherche : CHIMIE ET MICROBIOLOGIE DE L'EAU Présentée par Joëlle JANDRY Maitre ès sciences ************************ Directeurs de thèse : M.
    [Show full text]