DOCSLIB.ORG

Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 62 Article 1 2008 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 62 2008 Academy Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Recommended Citation Editors, Academy (2008) "Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 62 2008," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 62 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol62/iss1/1 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Entire Issue is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 Journal of the CODEN: AKASO ISBN: 0097-4374 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 62 2008 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Library Rate ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICAL SCIENCES 1701 N. BOULDER AVE RUSSELLVILLE, AR 72801-2222 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 2008 3 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol62/iss1/1 4 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 Arkansas Academy of Science, Dept. of Physical Sciences, Arkansas Tech University PAST PRESIDENTS OF THE ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Charles Brookover 1917 C. E. Hoffman 1959 Paul Sharrah 1984 Dwight M. Moore 1932-33, 1964 N. D. Buffaloe 1960 William L. Evans 1985 Flora Haas 1934 H. L. Bogan 1961 Gary Heidt 1986 H. H. Hyman 1935 Truman McEver 1962 Edmond Bacon 1987 L. B. Ham 1936 Robert Shideler 1963 Gary Tucker 1988 W. C. Munn 1937 L. F. Bailey 1965 DavidChittenden 1989 M. J. McHenry 1938 James H. Fribourgh 1966 Richard K. Speairs, Jr. 1990 T. L. Smith 1939 Howard Moore 1967 Robert Watson 1991 P. G. Horton 1940 John J. Chapman 1968 Michael W. Rapp 1992 L. A. Willis 1941-42 Arthur Fry 1969 Arthur A. Johnson 1993 L. B. Roberts 1943-44 M. L. Lawson 1970 George Harp 1994 Jeff Banks 1945 R. T. Kirkwood 1971 James Peck 1995 H. L. Winburn 1946-47 George E. Templeton 1972 Peggy R. Dorris 1996 E. A. Provine 1948 E. B. Whittlake 1973 Richard Kluender 1997 G. V. Robinette 1949 Clark McCarty 1974 James Daly 1998 John R. Totter 1950 Edward Dale 1975 Rose McConnell 1999 R. H. Austin 1951 Joe Guenter 1976 Mostafa Hemmati 2000 E. A. Spessard 1952 Jewel Moore 1977 Mark Draganjac 2001 Delbert Swartz 1953 Joe Nix 1978 John Rickett 2002 Z. V. Harvalik 1954 P. Max Johnson 1979 Walter E. Godwin 2003 M. Ruth Armstrong 1955 E. Leon Richards 1980 Wayne L.Gray 2004 W. W. Nedrow 1956 Henry W. Robison 1981 Betty Crump 2005 Jack W. Sears 1957 John K. Beadles 1982 Stanley Trauth 2006 J. R. Mundie 1958 Robbin C. Anderson 1983 David Saugey 2007 Collis Geren 2008 INSTITUTIONAL MEMBERS The Arkansas Academy of Science recognizes the support of the following institutions through their Institutional Membership in the Academy. ARKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY, Jonesboro ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY, Russellville JOHN BROWN UNIVERSITY, Siloam Springs SOUTHERN ARKANSAS UNIVERSITY, Magnolia UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, Little Rock UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT MONTICELLO UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT PINE BLUFF UNIVERSITY OF THE OZARKS, Clarksville UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FORT SMITH EDITORIAL STAFF Editor-in-Chief Managing Editor Biota Editor Associate Editors Mostafa Hemmati Ivan H. Still Douglas A. James C. Geren, UAF Dept. of Physical Science Dept. of Biology Dept of Biological Sciences S. Norman, UAMS Arkansas Tech University Arkansas Tech University Univ. of Arkansas S. Itza, Univ. Ozarks Russellville, AR 72801 Russellville, AR 72801 Fayetteville, AR 72701 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Published by Arkansas AcademyCOVER: of Science, Scanning 2008 Tunneling Microscope Image of Silicon. Photo from Dan Bullock, ATU 5 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE 2008 APRIL 11-12, 2008 92ND ANNUAL MEETING Henderson State University Arkadelphia, Arkansas https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol62/iss1/1 6 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 JOURNAL ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Annual Meeting 11-12 April 2008 Henderson State University Joyce Hardin Scott Kirkconnell Jeff Robertson President President-Elect Secretary Mostafa Hemmati Mostafa Hemmati Collis Geren Treasurer JAAS Editor-in-Chief Historian Secretary’s Report MINUTES OF THE 92ND MEETING ARKANSAS ACADEMY OF SCIENCE Undergraduate Poster 92st ANNUAL MEETING 1st Place: Russell Cline, 2nd Place: Wes Greer SUMMARY OF 1st and 2nd BUSINESS MEETINGS Henderson State University Graduate Poster April 11-12, 2008 1st Place: Karen Vale 1. Collis Geren, President of the AAS called the 3. Secretary/Newsletter Editor/Webmaster: Jeff meetings to order. Robertson: Minutes from the 2007 November Executive Committee meeting were distributed and 2. Local Organizing Committee: The LOC chair, minutes from the 2007 April membership business Renn Tumlison reported that the meeting had 160 meetings were distributed for review and accepted. registered participants. There were 83 oral and 49 There are currently 125 AAS members, 47 of poster presentations. Brett Serviss announced the which are life members. The current public portal student awards with special thanks to the faculty website is paid for through 2017 judges: (http://www.ArkansasAcademyofScience.org). Undergraduate Physical Science 4. Treasurer/Auditor: Mostafa Hemmati: The 1st Place: Paul Minor, 2nd Place: Jason R. Robison, “books” maintained by the Academy Treasurer 3rd Place: Jerakaycia D. Boman were reviewed by members of the Executive Committee and found to be good financial records Graduate Physical Science kept with excellent integrity and showing no 1st Place: Allan Thomas inconsistencies or irregularities with only an $11 imbalance hardly worth mentioning (The financial Undergraduate Life Science status of the Academy is in an Appendix found 1st Place: Allicia Kellogg, 2nd Place: Jerred Caskey elsewhere in this JAAS volume for review). A request for ~$100 to prepare taxes for the Graduate Life Science Academy has become necessary with new tax law. 1st Place: C. Brian Caldwell, 2nd Place: Jacy L. Wagnon, 3rd Place: Lauren P. Blair 5. Historian: Henry Robison: The AAS annual meeting this year at Henderson State University Undergraduate Environmental Science will be the 92nd meeting of the AAS and the 6th 1st Place: Nicole Freeman, 2nd Place: April Helms, time at HSU. HSU previously hosted the meeting rd 3 Place: Michael Gilbert in 1935, ‘41, ’68 (jointly with OBU), ‘82, and ‘93). This is the first time it has been held jointly with Graduate Environmental Science the Arkansas Undergraduate Research Conference st 1 Place: Tiffany A. Whitsitt, Henry Robison is stepping down after 25 years of nd 2 Place: Nathan J. Wentz service as the AAS historian. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62, 2008 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 2008 5 7 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 1 Secretary’s Report 6. Nominations Committee: Mostafa Hemmati: Russellville meeting in April 2007. Not all papers The committee submitted candidates for Historian were sent out for review. Three papers (10%) fell (Collis Geren) who was elected by acclamation under the category of Science Education and and ballots were cast for Vice-President between returned to author(s) with a friendly explanation Jeff Robertson and Derek Sears. Jeff Robertson letter stating that JAAS currently doesn’t publish was elected to serve and will be President-elect in these types of papers. Both Managing Editor and 2009 and President in 2010. Editor-in-Chief were in agreement on this matter. 7. Journal Editor-in-Chief: Stan Trauth: Twenty-six papers were sent out in early summer Reported that the printing of Volume 61 went to reviewers and Assoc. Editors and returned smoothly this year. I continue to use Bank and between July-September 2007. There was some Business Solutions, 1208 Falls Street, Jonesboro, tardiness in getting back a couple of reviews, as AR 72401, as the publisher of the Journal. Roger usual. A couple of reviewers did not send back a Williams can be reached via office review at all so one of the Editors served as a (1.800.442.2108) phone. His on-line address, reviewer. However, the review process proceeded www.prinformance.com, can be accessed for nicely and papers were processed in a timely purchasing CDs and PDFs of Journal articles. manner, much better and faster than in years Volume 61 encompassed a total of 146 pages and past!—isn’t that the way it is supposed to be in included 16 feature articles and 7 general notes. A your last year of editorship? An Asst. Editor read total of 195 copies were produced at a cost of mss. for style, grammar, format, etc. Authors were $8,196.84. I provided revised manuscripts to the then contacted via letter by me in August or Williams’ publishing team (BBS) via CDs and September 2007 as to whether their paper was hard copies from early October to late December, accepted tentatively and needed minor or major 2007. PDFs were generated for each accepted revision or whether their paper was outright manuscript by Jeremy Baker of BBS and provided rejected. Of the papers sent out for peer review, to me from late January to early March, 2008.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chemical Ecology and Evolution of Bee–Flower Interactions: a Review and Perspectives1
    668 REVIEW / SYNTHE` SE The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectives1 S. Do¨ tterl and N.J. Vereecken Abstract: Bees and angiosperms have shared a long and intertwined evolutionary history and their interactions have re- sulted in remarkable adaptations. Yet, at a time when the ‘‘pollination crisis’’ is of major concern as natural populations of both wild and honey bees (Apis mellifera L., 1758) face alarming decline rates at a worldwide scale, there are important gaps in our understanding of the ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions. In this review, we summarize and dis- cuss the current knowledge about the role of floral chemistry versus other communication channels in bee-pollinated flow- ering plants, both at the macro- and micro-evolutionary levels, and across the specialization–generalization gradient. The available data illustrate that floral scents and floral chemistry have been largely overlooked in bee–flower interactions, and that pollination studies integrating these components along with pollinator behaviour in a phylogenetic context will help gain considerable insights into the sensory ecology and the evolution of bees and their associated flowering plants. Re´sume´ : Les abeilles et les angiospermes partagent une grande partie de leur histoire e´volutive, et leurs interactions ont produit de remarquables exemples d’adaptations mutuelles. Cependant, a` une e´poque ou` la « crise de la pollinisation » de- vient une pre´occupation majeure et ou` les populations d’abeilles sauvages et mellife`res (Apis mellifera L., 1758) font face a` des de´clins massifs a` l’e´chelle mondiale, notre compre´hension de l’e´cologie et de l’e´volution des relations abeilles- plantes demeure fragmentaire.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Acanthocephala (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) of America North of Mexico with a Key to Species
    Zootaxa 2835: 30–40 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Review of Acanthocephala (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Coreidae) of America north of Mexico with a key to species J. E. McPHERSON1, RICHARD J. PACKAUSKAS2, ROBERT W. SITES3, STEVEN J. TAYLOR4, C. SCOTT BUNDY5, JEFFREY D. BRADSHAW6 & PAULA LEVIN MITCHELL7 1Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois 62901, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, Fort Hays State University, Hays, Kansas 67601, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Enns Entomology Museum, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 4Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 5Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, & Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 6Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Panhandle Research & Extension Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska 69361, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 7Department of Biology, Winthrop University, Rock Hill, South Carolina 29733, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract A review of Acanthocephala of America north of Mexico is presented with an updated key to species. A. confraterna is considered a junior synonym of A. terminalis, thus reducing the number of known species in this region from five to four. New state and country records are presented. Key words: Coreidae, Coreinae, Acanthocephalini, Acanthocephala, North America, review, synonymy, key, distribution Introduction The genus Acanthocephala Laporte currently is represented in America north of Mexico by five species: Acan- thocephala (Acanthocephala) declivis (Say), A.
    [Show full text]
  • Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 PBRIA a Newsletter for Plecopterologists
    No. 10 1990/1991 Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 PBRIA A Newsletter for Plecopterologists EDITORS: Richard W, Baumann Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 Peter Zwick Limnologische Flußstation Max-Planck-Institut für Limnologie, Postfach 260, D-6407, Schlitz, West Germany EDITORIAL ASSISTANT: Bonnie Snow REPORT 3rd N orth A merican Stonefly S ymposium Boris Kondratieff hosted an enthusiastic group of plecopterologists in Fort Collins, Colorado during May 17-19, 1991. More than 30 papers and posters were presented and much fruitful discussion occurred. An enjoyable field trip to the Colorado Rockies took place on Sunday, May 19th, and the weather was excellent. Boris was such a good host that it was difficult to leave, but many participants traveled to Santa Fe, New Mexico to attend the annual meetings of the North American Benthological Society. Bill Stark gave us a way to remember this meeting by producing a T-shirt with a unique “Spirit Fly” design. ANNOUNCEMENT 11th International Stonefly Symposium Stan Szczytko has planned and organized an excellent symposium that will be held at the Tree Haven Biological Station, University of Wisconsin in Tomahawk, Wisconsin, USA. The registration cost of $300 includes lodging, meals, field trip and a T- Shirt. This is a real bargain so hopefully many colleagues and friends will come and participate in the symposium August 17-20, 1992. Stan has promised good weather and good friends even though he will not guarantee that stonefly adults will be collected during the field trip. Printed August 1992 1 OBITUARIES RODNEY L.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 a New Record of Burrowing Mayfly, Anthopotamus Neglectus Neglectus
    Ohio Biological Survey Notes 10: 9–12, 2021. © Ohio Biological Survey, Inc. A New Record of Burrowing Mayfly, Anthopotamus neglectus neglectus (Traver, 1935) (Ephemeroptera: Potamanthidae), from Ohio, USA DONALD H. DEAN1 1Departments of Entomology and Chemistry & Biochemistry, 484 W. 12th Ave., The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH USA 43214. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: A new state record for a mayfly (Ephemeroptera) was collected on the Olentangy River, Delaware County, Ohio, USA. Anthopotamus neglectus Traver (1935) were collected as nymphs and subsequently reared to adults. Keywords: Olentangy River, Delaware County, Ohio Introduction The neglected hackle-gilled burrowing mayfly, or the golden (or yellow) drake to fly fishers, Anthopotamus neglectus was first described by Traver (1935) as Potomanthus neglectus. Bae and McCafferty (1991) reorganized the family Potomanthidae and placed the taxon in a new genus, Anthopotamus McCafferty and Bae (1990). They further divided the species into two subspecies, A. neglectus neglectus and A. neglectus disjunctus. The geographic range of the former species was originally given as a small circle centered in New York. The latter species was centered in the south-central United States. More recently, A. neglectus neglectus has been reported in eastern North America including Ontario, Alabama, Arkansas, Maryland, Missouri, Mississippi, New York, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia (Randolph, 2002). The online database NatureServe Explorer (2019) lists the range of A. neglectus neglectus as previously stated, with the addition of Georgia and Pennsylvania (but it includes the caveat “Distribution data for U.S. states and Canadian provinces is known to be incomplete or has not been reviewed for this taxon”).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Report110
    ~ ~ WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES A Survey of Rare and Endangered Mayflies of Selected RESEARCH Rivers of Wisconsin by Richard A. Lillie REPORT110 Bureau of Research, Monona December 1995 ~ Abstract The mayfly fauna of 25 rivers and streams in Wisconsin were surveyed during 1991-93 to document the temporal and spatial occurrence patterns of two state endangered mayflies, Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex. Both species are candidates under review for addition to the federal List of Endang­ ered and Threatened Wildlife. Based on previous records of occur­ rence in Wisconsin, sampling was conducted during the period May-July using a combination of sampling methods, including dredges, air-lift pumps, kick-nets, and hand-picking of substrates. No specimens of Anepeorus simplex were collected. Three specimens (nymphs or larvae) of Acanthametropus pecatonica were found in the Black River, one nymph was collected from the lower Wisconsin River, and a partial exuviae was collected from the Chippewa River. Homoeoneuria ammophila was recorded from Wisconsin waters for the first time from the Black River and Sugar River. New site distribution records for the following Wiscon­ sin special concern species include: Macdunnoa persimplex, Metretopus borealis, Paracloeodes minutus, Parameletus chelifer, Pentagenia vittigera, Cercobrachys sp., and Pseudiron centra/is. Collection of many of the aforementioned species from large rivers appears to be dependent upon sampling sand-bottomed substrates at frequent intervals, as several species were relatively abundant during only very short time spans. Most species were associated with sand substrates in water < 2 m deep. Acantha­ metropus pecatonica and Anepeorus simplex should continue to be listed as endangered for state purposes and receive a biological rarity ranking of critically imperiled (S1 ranking), and both species should be considered as candidates proposed for listing as endangered or threatened as defined by the Endangered Species Act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ants of Oklahoma Master of Science
    THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA By Jerry H. Young(I\" Bachelor of Science Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College Stillwater, Oklahoma 1955 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE January 1 1956 tl<lAWMA AGCMCl«.f�Al L �Ci'!AlttCAl e&U.Ull LIBRARY JUL16195 6 THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser }>JcMem��f � 't'" he Thesis ) Committee Member of the Thesis Committee 7'4'.��Member of the Thesis Committee Head of the Department ifean of the Graduate School 361565 ii PREFACE The study of the distribution of ants in the United States has been a long and continuous process with many contributors, but the State of Oklahoma has not received the attentions of these observers to any great extent. The only known list of ants of Oklahoma is one prepared by Mo Ro Smith (1935)0 Early in 1954 a survey of the state of Oklahoma was made to determine the species present and their distributiono The results of this survey, which blanketed the entire State, are given in this paper. The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dro Do E. Howell, chairman of the writer's thesis committee, for his valuable assistance and careful guidance in the preparation of this papero Also, much guidance on preparation of this manuscrip_t was received from Drs. Do Eo Bryan, William H. Irwin and F. A. Fenton. Many of the determin­ ations were made by M. R. Smith.. Vital infonnation was obtained from the museums at Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College and the University of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Crossness Sewage Treatment Works Nature Reserve & Southern Marsh Aquatic Invertebrate Survey
    Commissioned by Thames Water Utilities Limited Clearwater Court Vastern Road Reading RG1 8DB CROSSNESS SEWAGE TREATMENT WORKS NATURE RESERVE & SOUTHERN MARSH AQUATIC INVERTEBRATE SURVEY Report number: CPA18054 JULY 2019 Prepared by Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 30a Alexandra Rd London N8 0PP 1 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY 1.1 Introduction and background 1.1.1 On 30th May 2018 Colin Plant Associates (UK) were commissioned by Biodiversity Team Manager, Karen Sutton on behalf of Thames Water Utilities Ltd. to undertake aquatic invertebrate sampling at Crossness Sewage Treatment Works on Erith Marshes, Kent. This survey was to mirror the locations and methodology of a previous survey undertaken during autumn 2016 and spring 2017. Colin Plant Associates also undertook the aquatic invertebrate sampling of this previous survey. 1.1.2 The 2016-17 aquatic survey was commissioned with the primary objective of establishing a baseline aquatic invertebrate species inventory and to determine the quality of the aquatic habitats present across both the Nature Reserve and Southern Marsh areas of the Crossness Sewage Treatment Works. The surveyors were asked to sample at twenty-four, pre-selected sample station locations, twelve in each area. Aquatic Coleoptera and Heteroptera (beetles and true bugs) were selected as target groups. A report of the previous survey was submitted in Sept 2017 (Plant 2017). 1.1.3 During December 2017 a large-scale pollution event took place and untreated sewage escaped into a section of the Crossness Nature Reserve. The primary point of egress was Nature Reserve Sample Station 1 (NR1) though because of the connectivity of much of the waterbody network on the marsh other areas were affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    SYSTEMATICS Phylogenetic Analysis of Aphaenogaster Supports the Resurrection of Novomessor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) 1 B. B. DEMARCO AND A. I. COGNATO Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 288 Farm Lane, East Lansing, MI 48824. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108(2): 201–210 (2015); DOI: 10.1093/aesa/sau013 ABSTRACT The ant genus Aphaenogaster Mayr is an ecologically diverse group that is common throughout much of North America. Aphaenogaster has a complicated taxonomic history due to variabil- ity of taxonomic characters. Novomessor Emery was previously synonymized with Aphaenogaster, which was justified by the partial mesonotal suture observed in Aphaenogaster ensifera Forel. Previous studies using Bayesian phylogenies with molecular data suggest Aphaenogaster is polyphyletic. Convergent evolution and retention of ancestral similarities are two major factors contributing to nonmonophyly of Aphaenogaster. Based on 42 multistate morphological characters and five genes, we found Novomessor more closely related to Veromessor Forel and that this clade is sister to Aphaenogaster. Our results confirm the validity of Novomessor stat. r. as a separate genus, and it is resurrected based on the combi- nation of new DNA, morphological, behavioral, and ecological data. KEY WORDS Aphaenogaster, Novomessor, phylogenetics, resurrection Introduction phylogenetic analyses resolved Aphaenogaster as polyphyletic, including Messor Forel, 1890 and Sten- The ant genus Aphaenogaster Mayr, 1853 is a speciose amma (Brady et al. 2006, Moreau and Bell 2013). group,whichhasnotbeentaxonomicallyreviewedin Ward (2011) suggested that convergent evolution and over 60 years (Creighton 1950). Aphaenogaster con- retention of ancestral similarities were two major fac- tains 227 worldwide species (Bolton 2006), with 23 tors contributing to polyphyly of Aphaenogaster. valid North American species reduced from 31 original Aphaenogaster taxonomy was further complicated species descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Taxonomic Paper Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA Thomas P. Simon†, Charles C. Morris‡, Joseph R. Robb§, William McCoy | † Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 46403, United States of America ‡ US National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Porter, IN 47468, United States of America § US Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, Madison, IN 47250, United States of America | US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge, Oakland City, IN 47660, United States of America Corresponding author: Thomas P. Simon ([email protected]) Academic editor: Benjamin Price Received: 08 Dec 2014 | Accepted: 09 Jan 2015 | Published: 12 Jan 2015 Citation: Simon T, Morris C, Robb J, McCoy W (2015) Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Abstract The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Handy Bee Manual
    The Very Handy Manual: How to Catch and Identify Bees and Manage a Collection A Collective and Ongoing Effort by Those Who Love to Study Bees in North America Last Revised: October, 2010 This manual is a compilation of the wisdom and experience of many individuals, some of whom are directly acknowledged here and others not. We thank all of you. The bulk of the text was compiled by Sam Droege at the USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab over several years from 2004-2008. We regularly update the manual with new information, so, if you have a new technique, some additional ideas for sections, corrections or additions, we would like to hear from you. Please email those to Sam Droege ([email protected]). You can also email Sam if you are interested in joining the group’s discussion group on bee monitoring and identification. Many thanks to Dave and Janice Green, Tracy Zarrillo, and Liz Sellers for their many hours of editing this manual. "They've got this steamroller going, and they won't stop until there's nobody fishing. What are they going to do then, save some bees?" - Mike Russo (Massachusetts fisherman who has fished cod for 18 years, on environmentalists)-Provided by Matthew Shepherd Contents Where to Find Bees ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Nets ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Netting Technique ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Coreidae (Hemiptera), Chelinidea Vittiger and Anasa Armigera, New for Arkansas, U.S.A. Stephen W
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 62 Article 23 2008 Two Coreidae (Hemiptera), Chelinidea vittiger and Anasa armigera, New for Arkansas, U.S.A. Stephen W. Chordas III The Ohio State University, [email protected] Peter W. Kovarik Columbus State Community College Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Chordas, Stephen W. III and Kovarik, Peter W. (2008) "Two Coreidae (Hemiptera), Chelinidea vittiger and Anasa armigera, New for Arkansas, U.S.A.," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 62 , Article 23. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol62/iss1/23 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 62 [2008], Art. 23 Two Coreidae (Hemiptera), Chelinidea vittiger and Anasa armigera, New for Arkansas, U.S.A. S. Chordas III1 and P. Kovarik2 1Center for Life Sciences Education, The Ohio State University, 260 Jennings Hall, 1735 Neil Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210 2 Columbus State Community College 239 Crestview Road, Columbus, Ohio 43202 1Correspondence: [email protected] Most leaf-footed bugs (Hemiptera: Coreidae) Herring (1980) and Froeschner (1988) in not occurring north of Mexico are essentially generalist recognizing subspecies of Chelinidea vittiger (which phytophagous insects feeding on tender shoots or were almost solely based on color variations).
    [Show full text]