Thoughts About Paintings Conservation This Page Intentionally Left Blank Personal Viewpoints
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Destructive Pigment Characterization
Looking for common fingerprints in Leonardo’s pupils through non- destructive pigment characterization LETIZIA BONIZZONI 1*, MARCO GARGANO 1, NICOLA LUDWIG 1, MARCO MARTINI 2, ANNA GALLI 2, 3 1 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, , via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano (Italy) 2 Dipartimento di Scienza dei Materiali, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano (Italy) and INFN, Sezione Milano-Bicocca. 3 CNR-IFN,piazza L. da Vinci, 20132 Milano (Italy). *Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Non-invasive, portable analytical techniques are becoming increasingly widespread for the study and conservation in the field of cultural heritage, proving that a good data handling, supported by a deep knowledge of the techniques themselves, and the right synergy can give surprisingly substantial results when using portable but reliable instrumentation. In this work, pigment characterization was carried out on twenty-one Leonardesque paintings applying in situ XRF and FORS analyses. In-depth data evaluation allowed to get information on the colour palette and the painting technique of the different authors and workshops. Particular attention was paid to green pigments (for which a deeper study of possible pigments and alterations was performed with FORS analyses), flesh tones (for which a comparison with available data from cross sections was made) and ground preparation. Keywords pXRF, FORS, pigments, Leonardo’s workshop, Italian Renaissance INTRODUCTION “Tristo è quel discepolo che non ava[n]za il suo maestro” - Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his master - Leonardo da Vinci, Libro di Pittura, about 1493 1. 1 The influence of Leonardo on his peers during his activity in Milan (1482-1499 and 1506/8-1512/3) has been deep and a multitude of painters is grouped under the name of leonardeschi , but it is necessary to distinguish between his direct pupils and those who adopted his manner, fascinated by his works even outside his circle. -
Reading 1.2 Caravaggio: the Construction of an Artistic Personality
READING 1.2 CARAVAGGIO: THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ARTISTIC PERSONALITY David Carrier Source: Carrier, D., 1991. Principles of Art History Writing, University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp.49–79. Copyright ª 1991 by The Pennsylvania State University. Reproduced by permission of the publisher. Compare two accounts of Caravaggio’s personality: Giovanni Bellori’s brief 1672 text and Howard Hibbard’s Caravaggio, published in 1983. Bellori says that Caravaggio, like the ancient sculptor Demetrius, cared more for naturalism than for beauty. Choosing models, not from antique sculpture, but from the passing crowds, he aspired ‘only to the glory of colour.’1 Caravaggio abandoned his early Venetian manner in favor of ‘bold shadows and a great deal of black’ because of ‘his turbulent and contentious nature.’ The artist expressed himself in his work: ‘Caravaggio’s way of working corresponded to his physiognomy and appearance. He had a dark complexion and dark eyes, black hair and eyebrows and this, of course, was reflected in his painting ‘The curse of his too naturalistic style was that ‘soon the value of the beautiful was discounted.’ Some of these claims are hard to take at face value. Surely when Caravaggio composed an altarpiece he did not just look until ‘it happened that he came upon someone in the town who pleased him,’ making ‘no effort to exercise his brain further.’ While we might think that swarthy people look brooding more easily than blonds, we are unlikely to link an artist’s complexion to his style. But if portions of Bellori’s text are alien to us, its structure is understandable. -
Interiors and Interiority in Vermeer: Empiricism, Subjectivity, Modernism
ARTICLE Received 20 Feb 2017 | Accepted 11 May 2017 | Published 12 Jul 2017 DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.68 OPEN Interiors and interiority in Vermeer: empiricism, subjectivity, modernism Benjamin Binstock1 ABSTRACT Johannes Vermeer may well be the foremost painter of interiors and interiority in the history of art, yet we have not necessarily understood his achievement in either domain, or their relation within his complex development. This essay explains how Vermeer based his interiors on rooms in his house and used his family members as models, combining empiricism and subjectivity. Vermeer was exceptionally self-conscious and sophisticated about his artistic task, which we are still laboring to understand and articulate. He eschewed anecdotal narratives and presented his models as models in “studio” settings, in paintings about paintings, or art about art, a form of modernism. In contrast to the prevailing con- ception in scholarship of Dutch Golden Age paintings as providing didactic or moralizing messages for their pre-modern audiences, we glimpse in Vermeer’s paintings an anticipation of our own modern understanding of art. This article is published as part of a collection on interiorities. 1 School of History and Social Sciences, Cooper Union, New York, NY, USA Correspondence: (e-mail: [email protected]) PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS | 3:17068 | DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.68 | www.palgrave-journals.com/palcomms 1 ARTICLE PALGRAVE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.68 ‘All the beautifully furnished rooms, carefully designed within his complex development. This essay explains how interiors, everything so controlled; There wasn’t any room Vermeer based his interiors on rooms in his house and his for any real feelings between any of us’. -
Annual Report 2016
Collecting Exhibiting Learning Connecting Building Supporting Volunteering & Publishing & Interpreting & Collaborating & Conserving & Staffing 2016 Annual Report 4 21 10 2 Message from the Chair 3 Message from the Director and the President 4 Collecting 10 Exhibiting & Publishing 14 Learning & Interpreting 18 Connecting & Collaborating 22 Building & Conserving 26 Supporting 30 Volunteering & Staffing 34 Financial Statements 18 22 36 The Year in Numbers Cover: Kettle (detail), 1978, by Philip Guston (Bequest of Daniel W. Dietrich II, 2016-3-17) © The Estate of Philip Guston, courtesy McKee Gallery, New York; this spread, clockwise from top left: Untitled, c. 1957, by Norman Lewis (Purchased with funds contributed by the Committee for Prints, Drawings, and Photographs, 2016-36-1); Keith and Kathy Sachs, 1988–91, by Howard Hodgkin (Promised gift of Keith L. and Katherine Sachs) © Howard Hodgkin; Colorscape (detail), 2016, designed by Kéré Architecture (Commissioned by the Philadelphia Museum of Art for The Architecture of Francis Kéré: Building for Community); rendering © Gehry Partners, LLP; Inside Out Photography by the Philadelphia Museum of Art Photography Studio A Message A Message from the from the Chair Director and the President The past year represented the continuing strength of the Museum’s leadership, The work that we undertook during the past year is unfolding with dramatic results. trustees, staff, volunteers, city officials, and our many valued partners. Together, we Tremendous energy has gone into preparations for the next phase of our facilities have worked towards the realization of our long-term vision for this institution and a master plan to renew, improve, and expand our main building, and we continue reimagining of what it can be for tomorrow’s visitors. -
EDISON's Warriors
EDISON’S WaRRIORS Christoph Cox Real security can only be attained in the long run through confusion. — Hilton Howell Railey, commander of the Army Experimental Station1 Simulantur quae non sunt. Quae sunt vero dissimulantur. — Motto of the 23rd Special Troops2 In “The Invisible Generation,” an experimental text from 1962, William S. Burroughs unveiled a proposal to unleash urban mayhem via the use of portable tape recorders. “Now consider the harm that can be done and has been done when recording and playback is expertly carried out in such a way that the people affected do not know what is happening,” he wrote. “Bands of irresponsible youths with tape recorders playing back traffic sounds that confuse motorists,” Burroughs gleefully imagined, could incite “riots and demonstrations to order.”3 Championing the productive (and destructive) powers of portable audio, “The Invisible Generation” is an emblematic text in the history of sound art and DJ culture. Yet, nearly 20 years earlier, Burroughs’s vision had already been conceived and deployed by none other than the United States Army, whose “ghost army,” the 23rd Special Troops, included several units dedicated to “sonic deception” and its results: enemy confusion and carnage.4 The first division in American Armed Forces history assigned exclusively to camouflage and deception, the 23rd was a military oddity. Despite the centrality of deception in the history of warfare from the Trojan Horse on, soldiers drilled in the West Point code of duty, honor, trust, and integrity were ill-suited to a life of simulation and dissimulation; and American officers tended to dismiss deceptive tactics as underhanded, a sign of weakness in every sense.5 It’s not surprising, then, that the 23rd consisted primarily of a population with an occupational predisposition to deception, invention, and fabrication: artists. -
AATA Online Categories
AATA Online Categories Methods of Examination, Analysis, and Documentation (formerly A1-A5) Contains abstracts about the process of obtaining and/or storing information using a variety of techniques, including microscopy, imaging, and dating techniques; analytical techniques that establish chemical composition or physical state; data collection and management (e.g., GIS and GPS); and computer modeling. If the abstract deals with a method of analysis or examination independent of a specific material, or if it deals with the analysis or examination of too wide a range of materials to justify inclusion in Materials and Objects: Analysis, Treatment, and Techniques, it is classified here. Crossover technology and technology transfer are also included in this section. Field Editor: Marie-Claude Corbeil, Canada Preventive Conservation and General Topics (formerly B1-B5) Abstracts in this section address the general body of knowledge relating to preventive conservation, collections care, general treatment procedures and materials, conservation practice, health and safety, policy and legislation, history, ethics, and theory. Included as well are abstracts relating to conservation management and cultural tourism. Abstracts that are potentially relevant to all conservators, regardless of specialty, or that discuss a wide variety of materials appear here. For example, a work dealing with the effects of environmental pollution on cultural property in general would be included in this section, whereas a work describing the effect of pollution on the corrosion of metals would be located in Metals and Metallurgical By-products. Field Editors: Ruth Norton, United States, and Francoise Hanssen-Bauer, Norway Archaeological Conservation (formerly C1-C5) Focuses on the documentation, analysis, and management of both underwater and terrestrial archaeological sites and assemblages for the purposes of their conservation and preservation. -
The Ghost Army of World War II: How One Top-Secret Unit Deceived the Enemy with Inflatable Tanks, Sound Effects, and Other Audacious Fakery Online
XumZy [Read now] The Ghost Army of World War II: How One Top-Secret Unit Deceived the Enemy with Inflatable Tanks, Sound Effects, and Other Audacious Fakery Online [XumZy.ebook] The Ghost Army of World War II: How One Top- Secret Unit Deceived the Enemy with Inflatable Tanks, Sound Effects, and Other Audacious Fakery Pdf Free Rick Beyer, Elizabeth Sayles DOC | *audiobook | ebooks | Download PDF | ePub #19765 in Audible 2016-01-08Format: UnabridgedOriginal language:EnglishRunning time: 252 minutes | File size: 67.Mb Rick Beyer, Elizabeth Sayles : The Ghost Army of World War II: How One Top-Secret Unit Deceived the Enemy with Inflatable Tanks, Sound Effects, and Other Audacious Fakery before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised The Ghost Army of World War II: How One Top-Secret Unit Deceived the Enemy with Inflatable Tanks, Sound Effects, and Other Audacious Fakery: 46 of 46 people found the following review helpful. A MUST READ FOR ANY FAN OF WWIIBy RC MayerImagine, captured German maps showing 15,000 Allied troops in a location that there were no troops. Imagine, Nazirsquo;s keeping their soldiers out of position opposite what they think are thousand of enemy troops. Imagine, they can hear the US tanks lining up on the opposite riverbank. They can even here the soldiers yell ldquo;Hey Private! Put out that cigarette! Therersquo;s gas tanks over there!rdquo; Imagine, Nazi civilian spys transmitting radio broadcasts to Berlin that they overheard conversations in a pub in from soldiers in 4th Infantry Division that they were moving into Metz this evening. -
SAINT PRAXEDIS by JOHANNES VERMEER - One of Only Two Paintings by the Artist in Private Hands
PRESS RELEASE | LONDON FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Monday, 9 June 2014 SAINT PRAXEDIS BY JOHANNES VERMEER - One of only two paintings by the artist in private hands - LEADS THE SALE OF WORKS FROM THE BARBARA PIASECKA JOHNSON COLLECTION WITH PROCEEDS TO BENEFIT THE BARBARA PIASECKA JOHNSON FOUNDATION AT CHRISTIE’S IN JULY London – Christie’s is pleased to announce that works from The Barbara Piasecka Johnson Collection with Proceeds to Benefit the Barbara Piasecka Johnson Foundation will be offered at Christie’s London from 8 to 17 July. The star lot is the famous painting of Saint Praxedis by Johannes Vermeer of Delft (1632-1675), from 1655, which is the earliest dated picture by the artist and one of only two from his rare oeuvre to remain in private hands (estimate: £6-8 million, illustrated above). The results of recent material technical analysis conducted by the Rijksmuseum in association with the Free University, Amsterdam endorses Vermeer’s authorship of the picture. They establish not only that the lead white used in the paint is consistent with Dutch painting and is incontrovertibly not Italian; they also reveal a precise match with another established early painting by Vermeer - Diana and her Companions, in The Mauritshuis, The Hague. The match even suggests that the exact same batch of paint was used for both paintings. This magnificent painting offers one of the rarest and most alluring opportunities for collectors and institutions this season. Please click here for the full catalogue note on this work. An art connoisseur whose dedicated collecting was underpinned by art historical training in Poland, where she was born, Barbara Piasecka Johnson (1937- 2013) was also a humanitarian and philanthropist. -
Jheronimus Bosch-His Sources
In the concluding review of his 1987 monograph on Jheronimus Bosch, Roger Marijnissen wrote: ‘In essays and studies on Bosch, too little attention has been paid to the people who Jheronimus Bosch: his Patrons and actually ordered paintings from him’. 1 And in L’ABCdaire de Jérôme Bosch , a French book published in 2001, the same author warned: ‘Ignoring the original destination and function his Public of a painting, one is bound to lose the right path. The function remains a basic element, and What we know and would like to know even the starting point of all research. In Bosch’s day, it was the main reason for a painting to exist’. 2 The third International Bosch Conference focuses precisely on this aspect, as we can read from the official announcement (’s-Hertogenbosch, September 2012): ‘New information Eric De Bruyn about the patrons of Bosch is of extraordinary importance, since such data will allow for a much better understanding of the original function of these paintings’. Gathering further information about the initial reception of Bosch’s works is indeed one of the urgent desiderata of Bosch research for the years to come. The objective of this introductory paper is to offer a state of affairs (up to September 2012) concerning the research on Bosch’s patronage and on the original function of his paintings. I will focus on those things that can be considered proven facts but I will also briefly mention what seem to be the most interesting hypotheses and signal a number of desiderata for future research. -
Structure and Lining: a Review
Coddington, J. and Young, C. (2018) Structure and lining: A review. AIC News, 43(3), 1, 6-9. This is the author’s final accepted version. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/162704/ Deposited on: 22 May 2018 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk 01- Lead Article Structure and Lining: A Review By Jim Coddington and Christina Young Historically, changes in the practice of structural conservation of paintings reflect the general thrust of change in conservation practice; slow and perhaps even methodical. Only occasionally can we identify landmark moments or events that have shifted the field. The 1974 Greenwich Lining Conference is one such event in the history of the conservation of paintings. The conference’s nominal topic was lining, or the addition of a second fabric to the back of the original, a profound intervention on the work of art and thus a topic of the great importance then and now. The conference papers and discussions scrutinized then current practices in lining and the structural restoration of paintings as well as new approaches that were in development at the time. Box start Conference Proceedings were published in 2000, as: Villers C., ed. 2004. Lining Paintings: Papers from the Greenwich Conference on Comparative Lining Techniques, Archetype Publications. Box end What was manifestly clear in 1974 was that our understanding of the mechanics of paintings, their mechanisms of deterioration and other fundamental questions was limited. -
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice
Historical Painting Techniques, Materials, and Studio Practice PUBLICATIONS COORDINATION: Dinah Berland EDITING & PRODUCTION COORDINATION: Corinne Lightweaver EDITORIAL CONSULTATION: Jo Hill COVER DESIGN: Jackie Gallagher-Lange PRODUCTION & PRINTING: Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZERS: Erma Hermens, Art History Institute of the University of Leiden Marja Peek, Central Research Laboratory for Objects of Art and Science, Amsterdam © 1995 by The J. Paul Getty Trust All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-89236-322-3 The Getty Conservation Institute is committed to the preservation of cultural heritage worldwide. The Institute seeks to advance scientiRc knowledge and professional practice and to raise public awareness of conservation. Through research, training, documentation, exchange of information, and ReId projects, the Institute addresses issues related to the conservation of museum objects and archival collections, archaeological monuments and sites, and historic bUildings and cities. The Institute is an operating program of the J. Paul Getty Trust. COVER ILLUSTRATION Gherardo Cibo, "Colchico," folio 17r of Herbarium, ca. 1570. Courtesy of the British Library. FRONTISPIECE Detail from Jan Baptiste Collaert, Color Olivi, 1566-1628. After Johannes Stradanus. Courtesy of the Rijksmuseum-Stichting, Amsterdam. Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Historical painting techniques, materials, and studio practice : preprints of a symposium [held at] University of Leiden, the Netherlands, 26-29 June 1995/ edited by Arie Wallert, Erma Hermens, and Marja Peek. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-89236-322-3 (pbk.) 1. Painting-Techniques-Congresses. 2. Artists' materials- -Congresses. 3. Polychromy-Congresses. I. Wallert, Arie, 1950- II. Hermens, Erma, 1958- . III. Peek, Marja, 1961- ND1500.H57 1995 751' .09-dc20 95-9805 CIP Second printing 1996 iv Contents vii Foreword viii Preface 1 Leslie A. -
The Destruction of Art
1 The destruction of art Solvent form examines art and destruction—through objects that have been destroyed (lost in fires, floods, vandalism, or, similarly, those that actively court or represent this destruction, such as Christian Marclay’s Guitar Drag or Chris Burden’s Samson), but also as an undoing process within art that the object challenges through form itself. In this manner, events such as the Momart warehouse fire in 2004 (in which large hold- ings of Young British Artists (YBA) and significant collections of art were destroyed en masse through arson), as well as the events surrounding art thief Stéphane Breitwieser (whose mother destroyed the art he had stolen upon his arrest—putting it down a garbage disposal or dumping it in a nearby canal) are critical events in this book, as they reveal something about art itself. Likewise, it is through these moments of destruction that we might distinguish a solvency within art and discover an operation in which something is made visible at a time when art’s metaphorical undo- ing emerges as oddly literal. Against this overlay, a tendency is mapped whereby individuals attempt to conceptually gather these destroyed or lost objects, to somehow recoup them in their absence. This might be observed through recent projects, such as Jonathan Jones’s Museum of Lost Art, the Tate Modern’s Gallery of Lost Art, or Henri Lefebvre’s text The Missing Pieces; along with exhibitions that position art as destruction, such as Damage Control at the Hirschhorn Museum or Under Destruction by the Swiss Institute in New York.