Statement from Mr. Sanjay Aggarwal, CEO, Kingfisher Airlines Ltd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A. -
Reason Behind Kingfisher Airline's Failure: “An Eye Opening Case Study
REASON BEHIND KINGFISHER AIRLINE’S FAILURE: “AN EYE OPENING CASE STUDY REVEALING THREE KEY WORDS FOR AVIATION INDUSTRY SUCCESS: COSTS, COSTS, COSTS” * JAYANT SRIVASTAVA (Asst. Professor, Trinity Business School, Murad Nagar, Ghaziabad) ** ASAD ALI & AKANSHA TIWARI (Students PGDM, Trinity Business School) ABSTRACT: Our research paper try to throw lights on some major reasons which were somehow responsible for the current crisis going inside the kingfisher Airlines which can be realized by the press statement from KFA, on 12 March 2012, highlights the challenges: “The flight loads have reduced because of our limited distribution ability caused by IATA suspension. We are therefore combining some of our flights. Also, some of the flights are being cancelled as a result of employee agitation on account of delayed salaries. This situation has arisen as a consequence of our bank accounts having been frozen by the tax authorities. We are making all possible efforts to remedy this temporary situation.” RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: The key objective of this research study is to investigate the reasons behind the failure of the Kingfisher airline in the year 2012. To investigate the government policies and the various steps taken to fix the current crisis. To investigate the reasons due to which the whole Aviation Industry is suffering from higher operating losses. What went so terribly wrong with Kingfisher when rival Jet Airways has comparatively much higher debt? INTRODUCTION: Global aviation industry is passing through challenging times due to unprecedented fuel price hike during the last 4 years, turbulent financial markets and economic recession. Vijay Malaya’s dream bird, Kingfisher Airlines - popularly known as The King of Good Times - is witnessing its worst phase. -
Kingfisher Airlines Limited
KINGFISHER AIRLINES LIMITED ANNUAL REPORT 2012 - 2013 Kingfisher Airlines Limited Registered Office: UB Tower, Level 12, UB City, 24, Vittal Mallya Road, Bangalore - 560 001 NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF THE EIGHTEENTH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING of the Company to be held at Good Shepherd Auditorium, Opposite St. Joseph’s Pre-University College, Residency Road, Bangalore – 560 025 on Tuesday, September 24, 2013 at 1.30 p.m. for the following purposes: 1. To receive and consider the accounts for the year ended March 31, 2013 and the reports of the Auditors and Directors thereon; 2. To elect a Director in the place of Mr. Subhash R. Gupte who retires by rotation and being eligible, offers himself for re-appointment; 3. To appoint Auditors and fix their remuneration. The retiring Auditors M/s. B. K. Ramadhyani & Co., are eligible for re-appointment. By Order of the Board Place : Goa Bharath Raghavan Date : August 14, 2013 Chief Legal Officer & Company Secretary Notes : 1. A SHAREHOLDER ENTITLED TO ATTEND THE MEETING AND VOTE THEREAT MAY APPOINT A PROXY TO ATTEND AND VOTE ON HIS BEHALF ONLY ON A POLL. SUCH A PROXY NEED NOT BE A MEMBER OF THE COMPANY. The proxy form duly completed must reach the Registered Office of the Company not later than forty-eight hours before the time appointed for the holding of the Meeting. 2. The Register of Members and Share Transfer Books will remain closed from Thursday, September 19, 2013 to Tuesday, September 24, 2013 (both days inclusive). 3. Members are required to intimate immediately to the Company’s Registrars and Transfer Agents, M/s Karvy Computershare Private Limited, 17-24, Vittal Rao Nagar, Madhapur, Hyderabad – 500 081 (Telephone No: 040-44655000, Fax. -
SISF Contract V2
AGREEMENT FOR GLOBAL BRAND AWARENESS AND STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS CAMPAIGN FOR PROJECT SISF DATED 23 JULY 2009 1 PARTIES 1.1 This Agreement is made by and between FBC MEDIA (UK) LIMITED of 12-16 Laystall St, London EC1R 4PF (“FBC”) and SISF of Address (“The Client”). 2 TERM 2.1 This agreement runs from 1 September 2009 to 28 February 2011. Unless otherwise specified, all references to deliverables contained in this contract are for the 18 month period from 1 September 2009. 2.2 The parties shall meet every three months to review progress and re-examine priorities on a flexible basis every six months to plan ahead. 2.3The parties shall sit down no less than 60 days prior to the end of the Term to discuss and agree the details of a further Agreement. 3 STRATEGIC COUNSEL, PLANNING AND ADVISORY SERVICES 3.1 FBC shall make available the services of John Defterios (JD), Matthieuse Coombes-Olney (MCO), Eckart Sagar (ES), Patrizia Marin (PM), and Alan Friedman (AF) to act as principal advisors in the management of their Strategic Communication and International Outreach strategy. During the Term, JD, MCO, and AF shall proactively manage this project and shall be in SISF for the purposes of media planning and strategic meetings at or before the beginning of every quarter. 3.2 FBC will also provide a team of media and public affairs specialists to assist with the placement of interviews on and around summits, bi lateral meetings and events as agreed. 3.3 FBC shall organise itself to enable a rapid deployment for ad hoc interventions according to demand and shall, subject to agreement, accelerate the timing of the work performed under this contract as required by SISF. -
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS; Treas. § 122.25
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS; Treas. Pt. 122 PART 122—AIR COMMERCE 122.44 Crew baggage declaration. 122.45 Crew list. REGULATIONS 122.46 Crew purchase list. 122.47 Stores list. Sec. 122.48 Air cargo manifest. 122.0 Scope. 122.48a Electronic information for air cargo required in advance of arrival. Subpart A—General Definitions and 122.48b Air Cargo Advance Screening Provisions (ACAS). 122.1 General definitions. 122.49 Correction of air cargo manifest or 122.2 Other Customs laws and regulations. air waybill. 122.3 Availability of forms. 122.49a Electronic manifest requirement for 122.4 English language required. passengers onboard commercial aircraft 122.5 Reproduction of Customs forms. arriving in the United States. 122.49b Electronic manifest requirement for Subpart B—Classes of Airports crew members and non-crew members on- board commercial aircraft arriving in, 122.11 Designation as international airport. continuing within, and overflying the 122.12 Operation of international airports. United States. 122.13 List of international airports. 122.49c Master crew member list and master 122.14 Landing rights airport. non-crew member list requirement for 122.15 User fee airports. commercial aircraft arriving in, depart- ing from, continuing within, and over- Subpart C—Private Aircraft flying the United States. 122.49d Passenger Name Record (PNR) infor- 122.21 Application. mation. 122.22 Electronic manifest requirement for 122.50 General order merchandise. all individuals onboard private aircraft arriving in and departing from the Subpart F—International Traffic Permit United States; notice of arrival and de- parture information. 122.51 Aircraft of domestic origin registered 122.23 Certain aircraft arriving from areas in the U.S. -
The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport Activity
Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World 10-12 November 2008, Guadalajara, Mexico The Impacts of Globalisation on International Air Transport A ctivity Past trends and future perspectives Ken Button, School of George Mason University, USA NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT This paper was prepared by Prof. Ken Button of School of George Mason University, USA, as a contribution to the OECD/ITF Global Forum on Transport and Environment in a Globalising World that will be held 10-12 November 2008 in Guadalajara, Mexico. The paper discusses the impacts of increased globalisation on international air traffic activity – past trends and future perspectives. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTE FROM THE SECRETARIAT ............................................................................................................. 2 THE IMPACT OF GLOBALIZATION ON INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ACTIVITY - PAST TRENDS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE .................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Globalization and internationalization .................................................................................................. 5 3. The Basic Features of International Air Transportation ....................................................................... 6 3.1 Historical perspective ................................................................................................................. -
DENNIS E DUSTRY CONSOLIDATION . ND FL. L Ite
i::i DENNIS E_DUSTRY CONSOLIDATION ._ND FL._L_ItE AJRLLNE _TWORK STRUCTURES IN EUROPE m NigelDc_n_ Senior Research Fellow Transport Studies Group University of Westminster 35 Marylebone Road LONDON NW1 5LS Tel: .444 20 79!1 5000 ext 334A. Fax: +44 20 7911 5057 e-mall: [email protected] A__hs!ra__ct In the current downaa'n in demand for air travel, major airlines are revising and rationalising their networks in an attempt to improve financial performance and strengthen their defences against both new entrants and traditional rivals. Expansion of commercial agreements or alliances with other airlines has become a key reaction to the increasingly competitive marketplace. In the absence, for regulatory reasons, of cross-border mergers these are the principal means by which the industry can consolidate internationally. The failure of airlines such as Sabena and Swlssair has also enforced restructuring at some of Europe's busier airports. This paper analyses the developments which have been taking place and attempts to itentify the implications for airline network _s and the function of different hub airports. Airlines have rationalised their networks by withdrawing services that feed the hubs of rival alliances. New ;links have however _ created hthatare made feasible by the alliance support. The range of services available to passengers in long-haul markets to/from Europe is evaluated before and after recent industry reorganisation. Hubs are crucial to interlink the route networks of parmers in an alliance. However, duplication between nearby hub airports that find themselves within the same airline alliance can lead to loss of service at the weaker locations. -
BORDER SECURITY: CBP Aims to Prevent High-Risk Travelers From
United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters January 2017 BORDER SECURITY CBP Aims to Prevent High-Risk Travelers from Boarding U.S.- Bound Flights, but Needs to Evaluate Program Performance GAO-17-216 January 2017 BORDER SECURITY CBP Aims to Prevent High-Risk Travelers from Boarding U.S.-Bound Flights, But Needs to Highlights of GAO-17-216, a report to Evaluate Program Performance congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found DHS seeks to identify and interdict The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Customs and Border international air travelers who are Protection (CBP) analyzes traveler data and threat information to identify high- potential security threats to the United risk travelers before they board U.S.-bound flights. CBP’s National Targeting States, such as foreign fighters and Center (NTC), the primary entity responsible for these analyses, conducts potential terrorists, human traffickers, traveler data matching which assesses whether travelers are high-risk by and otherwise inadmissible persons, at matching their information against U.S. government databases and lists, and the earliest possible point in time. In rules-based targeting, which enables CBP to identify unknown high-risk fiscal year 2015, CBP processed more individuals. CBP operates multiple predeparture programs that use the results of than 104 million U.S.-bound air NTC’s analyses to help identify and interdict high-risk travelers before they board travelers. CBP operates various U.S.-bound flights. CBP officers inspect all U.S. bound travelers on precleared predeparture programs domestically and overseas that are designed to flights at the 15 Preclearance locations and, if deemed inadmissible, a traveler identify and interdict high-risk travelers will not be permitted to board the aircraft. -
Jet Fuel: from Well to Wing
Jet Fuel: From Well to Wing JANUARY 2018 Abstract Airlines for America (A4A) is the nation’s oldest and largest U.S. airline industry trade association. Its members1 and their affiliates account for more than 70 percent of the passenger and cargo traffic carried by U.S. airlines. According to the Energy Information Administration, U.S.-based jet fuel demand averaged 1.6 million barrels per day in 2016. Generally, fuel is supplied to airports through a combination of interstate multiproduct pipelines, third-party and off-airport terminals, and dedicated local pipelines. The last few years have continued to demonstrate the fragility of this complex system and the threat it poses to air-service continuity. The current interstate refined products pipeline system, constructed many decades ago, is both capacity-constrained and vulnerable to disruptions that typically require a patchwork of costly, inadequate fixes. New shippers have difficulty obtaining line space and long-established shippers have difficulty shipping all of their requirements. It is likely that demand will continue to outpace the capacity of our outdated distribution system for liquid fuels. Given the increasing demand to transport liquid fuels, it is imperative that we take steps to overcome existing bottlenecks and prevent future ones. These fuels are essential to aviation, trucking and rail, among others, which help power our twenty- first century economy. As shippers and consumers of significant quantities of refined products on pipelines throughout the country, airlines and other users of liquid fuels have a substantial interest in addressing the nationwide deficiency in pipeline investment. Surely, expedited permitting for fuel distribution-related infrastructure projects could help pave the way to upgrade existing pipeline assets and expand throughput capacity into key markets. -
A Case Study of Air India & Kingfisher Airlines Aniruddha
ZENITH International Journal of Business Economics & Management Research Vol.2 Issue 1, January 2012, ISSN 2249 8826 Online available at http://zenithresearch.org.in/ – & ANIRUDDHA SARKAR*; SUVARUN GOSWAMI** *Junior Research Fellow, Dep of Commerce, The University of Burdwan , Burdwan -713104 , *Assistant Professor in Commerce , Rishi Bankim Chnadra Evening College , Naihati , North 24 Parganas , West Bengal , ABSTRACT India's infrastructure has been improving slowly but steadily over recent year with foreign investors increasingly keen to invest in the sector. Infrastructure Sector Growth Rate in India has been on the rise in the last few years. The Growth Rate of the Infrastructure Sector GDP has grown due to several reasons and this in its turn has given a major boost to the country's economy. In the present article an endeavor has been made to throw some light on the financial performance of Indian Aviation sector means of a comparative study between Air India and Kingfisher Airlines, key infrastructure sector. The financial performance has been with the help of some key Finally the study ends with some valid suggestions which deserve the attention of the management of both the companies under study and Government. KEYWORDS: Infrastructure, Indian Airways, Financial Performance, PI, UI & EL. ______________________________________________________________________________ Infrastructure is the basic physical and organizational structure needed for the operation of a society or enterprise, or the services and facilities necessary for an economy to function. The term typically refers to the technical structures that support a society, such as roads, water supply, sewers, power grids, telecommunications, and so forth. Viewed functionally, infrastructure facilitates the production of goods and services; for example, roads enable the transport of raw materials to a factory, and also for the distribution of finished products to markets. -
Level of Service Design Concept for Airport Passenger Terminals: a European View
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1199 19 Level of Service Design Concept for Airport Passenger Terminals: A European View NORMAN ASHFORD The concept of level of service has been developed by planners traffic loads. The original 1965 manual has recently been and designers to provide some degree of sensitivity in the updated (3) to conform with more recent experience and processes of design and capacity analysis for transport facili improved data, but the basic concept remains essentially ties. By designating a number of service levels in lieu of a unchanged. The modern Highway Capacity Manual en single capacity figure, a designer is able to evaluate the ables the highway engineer to evaluate how altering traffic performance of a facility under the varying load conditions throughput affects the level of service provided by a high that might reasonably be anticipated in the life of that facility. way facility and permits the determination of the "capac Level of service analysis provides, to some degree a measure of the comfort and convenience experienced by system users ity" of a facility in terms of a design service volume. when the facility is operating at the various possible levels of The considerable improvement of the 1965 Highway design and service volumes. Allied with cost, the level of Capacity Manual over its predecessor led Fruin to apply a service criterion is a useful input to the design or operation of similar methodology to the design of pedestrian spaces ( 4). a transport facility. In this work, it was stated that the dimensional design of pedestrian spaces involves the application of traffic engi neering principles and the consideration of human con The earliest widespread use of the concept of transporta venience and the design environment. -
List of Airlines
Indian Airlines LIST OF AIRLINES Iran Air Japan Airlines Jet Airways Aer Lingus Kenya Airways Aeroflot Kingfisher Airlines Aerolineas Argentinas KLM Afriqiyah Airways KLM City Hopper Air Astana Korean Air Air Barundi Kuwait Airways Air Berlin Kyrghzstan Airlines Air Canada Lan Air China LOT - Polish Airlines Air Comet Lufthansa Air Europa Luxair Air France Maersk Air Air India Mahan Air Air Madagascar Malaysia Airlines Air Malawi Malev Hungarian Airline Air Malta Martinair Holland NV Air Mauritius Mexicana Air Namibia Middle East Airlines Air New Zealand Northwest Airlines Air Nigeria Oman Air Air Seychelles Ltd. Pakistan International Air Zimbabwe Philippine Airlines Alitalia Qantas All Nippon Airways Qatar Airways American Airlines Royal Air Maroc Arik Air Royal Brunei Airlines Armenian Airlines Royal Jordanian Asiana Airlines Royal Nepal Airlines Austrian Airlines Saudi Arabian Airlines B.W.I.A. Scandinavian Airlines Bangkok Airways Silk Air Biman Bangladesh Singapore Airlines BMI British Midland SN Brussels Airlines British Airways South African Airways British European Airway Srilankan Airlines British Mediterranean Sudan Airways Bulgaria Air Swiss Air Cathay Pacific Syrian Arab Airlines China Airlines Tam Linhas Aereas China Eastern Airline TAP Portugal China Southern Airline TAP-Air Portugal Continental Airlines Tarom Romanian Airlines Cyprus Airways Thai Airways Cyprus Turkish Air Tunis Air Czech Airlines Turkish Airlines Delta Air Lines Turkmenistan Airlines East African Safari Air United Airlines Egypt Air US Airways EL-AL Israeli Airlines Uzbekistan Airways Emirates Airlines Varig Brazilian Airline Estonian Air Vietnam Airlines Ethiopian Airlines Virgin Atlantic Etihad Airways Virgin Express Eva Air Vlm Airlines Finnair Yemenia Airways Gulf Air Iberia Airlines Icelandair .