Human Rights: an Obstacle to Peace in the Western Sahara? (ARI)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Human Rights: an Obstacle to Peace in the Western Sahara? (ARI) Area: Mediterranean & Arab World ARI 47/2011 (Translated from Spanish) Date: 11/4/2011 Human Rights: An Obstacle to Peace in the Western Sahara? (ARI) Renata Capella Soler* Theme: The establishment of a human rights monitoring mechanism in the Western Sahara, preferably through an expansion of MINURSO’s mandate, would change the underlying dynamics of the conflict and allow for progress in the negotiation process. Summary: The focus on human rights in the Western Sahara has increased the visibility of the conflict and the pressure to resolve it, creating opportunities to break the current impasse that third parties should seize. A human rights monitoring mechanism, preferably as part of MINURSO, could serve as a confidence-building measure. Moreover, a firm position regarding the parties’ human rights obligations would set a precedent for an international mediation with more muscle, thus changing the conflict’s underlying dynamics. Close coordination between Spain and the UK to establish a human rights monitoring mechanism would neutralise French opposition to it, alter the balance of forces within the Group of Friends of the Secretary General on Western Sahara (the ‘Group of Friends’) and give rise to the conditions necessary to increase its efficiency. At the upcoming April session, a Security Council decision to set up a human rights monitoring mechanism would allow for progress in the negotiation process, bringing closer the resolution of the Western Sahara conflict. Analysis: In the last two years, the need to establish a human rights monitoring mechanism together with the possible expansion of the current mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) were the primary focus of the Security Council debates on Western Sahara. Unless prior agreement on the matter is reached, the debate is likely to resume with even greater intensity at the upcoming Security Council meeting to be held in April 2011. At this meeting, the Council will convene to consider the next report of the Secretary-General on the situation in the Western Sahara and decide on the extension of MINURSO’s mandate. This year Spain is not a Security Council member. However, as a member of the EU, and the ‘Group of Friends’ in particular, Spain will inevitably be drawn into the debate and will have to face demands for it to adopt a clear stance on the matter. As far as Spanish diplomacy is concerned, this is not only a challenge but also an opportunity to show leadership in multilateral settings by establishing alliances and launching initiatives that contribute to resolving a situation that is widely considered unsustainable. In Resolution 1920 of 30 April 2010, the Security Council also recognised that ‘the consolidation of the status quo is not acceptable in the long term’. * Signature. 1 Area: Mediterranean & Arab World ARI 47/2011 (Translated from Spanish) Date: 11/4/2011 Human rights: A Stumbling Block on the Road to Peace? There is concern that the increased focus on human rights might distract the attention of the Security Council from the political issues that are at stake in Western Sahara. Another criticism is that rather than being a demand driven by true concern, the Polisario Front’s insistence on the human rights issue is a tactical ploy to attack Morocco. The focus on human rights in the Security Council debate on the Western Sahara must be seen in a wider context. Since the end of the Cold War, it has been the practice of the Security Council to link human rights to the maintenance of international peace and security. By way of example, Security Council Resolution 688 (1991) condemned ‘the repression of the Iraqi civilian population’, demanded that Iraq put an end to it ‘as a contribution to remove the threat to international peace and security in the region’ and expressed hope that a dialogue would ‘ensure that the human and political rights of all Iraqi citizens are respected’. A more recent example is Security Council Resolution 1970 (2011).1 After deploring ‘the gross and systematic violation of human rights, including the repression of peaceful demonstrators’, the resolution refers the situation in Libya since 15 February 2011 to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and underlines ‘the need to respect the freedoms of peaceful assembly and of expression, including freedom of the media’. Acting under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, Resolution 1970 calls for ‘steps to fulfil the legitimate demands of the population’ and urges the Libyan authorities ‘to allow immediate access for international human rights monitors’ and to ‘immediately lift restrictions on all forms of media’. Ignoring the human rights situation in Western Sahara and failing to examine it by the standards applied to Libya at the upcoming April session would expose the Security Council to allegations of selectivity in the application of universally-recognised norms. This could seriously undermine its credibility and thus affect its capacity to maintain peace and security in the region. Furthermore, by putting on the table of the Security Council the expansion of MINURSO’s mandate, the Polisario Front has integrated into its diplomatic strategy a recommendation made years earlier by international human-rights organisations (Amnesty International’s campaign goes back as far as 1992). Be that as it may, a Security Council decision to give a mandate to MINURSO to monitor human rights in Western Sahara and the Tindouf refugee camps (on Algerian territory) would require the consent of Morocco, the Polisario Front and Algeria, putting to the test the commitment to human rights of all three parties. The Focus on Human Rights: Effect Rather than Cause of Conflict Irresolution In 2006 the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) concluded in a confidential report leaked to the press2 that almost all violations against the people of Western Sahara stemmed from the non-implementation of the right to self-determination. This suggests that rather than being the cause, the focus on human rights is an effect of the failure to find a political solution that allows self-determination. Against the background of broken promises to hold a referendum, the lack of viability of the armed struggle and a stalled diplomatic process, the right to self-determination has become a major campaign theme for Sahrawi activists on the basis of Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil 1 See http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/245/58/PDF/N1124558.pdf?OpenElement. 2 See http://www.arso.org/OHCHRrep2006en.pdf. 2 Area: Mediterranean & Arab World ARI 47/2011 (Translated from Spanish) Date: 11/4/2011 and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1966. In order to repress their activities and to intimidate the population of Western Sahara, the Moroccan authorities have used legislation prohibiting attacks on Morocco’s ‘territorial integrity’. In this context, violations of the rights of expression, association and assembly have occurred as well as unfair trials, ill-treatment, torture and police violence. Morocco has further restricted media access and expelled international observers. A 2008 Human Rights Watch (HRW) report3 concluded that the ‘limits to Morocco’s progress on human rights are apparent in the way authorities suppress opposition to the officially held position that Western Sahara is part of Morocco’. Human rights violations linked to the lack of a resolution of the conflict have also been documented in the Tindouf camps administered by the Polisario Front. For example, in September 2010, the police officer Mostafa Salma Sidi Mouloud was arbitrarily detained after publicly expressing support for the Moroccan autonomy proposal –which excludes a referendum with an independence option as advocated by the Polisario Front– and announcing that he would further promote it in the Tindouf camps. Increasing the Visibility of a Forgotten Conflict In a 2004 interview to the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), the former US Secretary of State and Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara from 1997 to 2004, James Baker, pointed out that its low profile in the international order made the resolution of the Western Sahara conflict difficult to achieve. It would therefore seem fair to conclude that by raising its profile on the international agenda and making it more visible4 the focus on human rights has added pressure to resolve the conflict, and thus the chances that it this might occur. Three major events have strengthened international solidarity on the basis of the human rights discourse: the 2005 Sahrawi uprising (intifada), Aminetu Haidar’s defiance in resisting her expulsion from El-Ayoun through a hunger-strike in 2009 and the actions linked to the Gdeim Izik protest camp in November 2010. The challenge is to design diplomatic strategies that take advantage of the pressure and interest that the human rights issue has aroused to transform the relations between the stakeholders and break the impasse. In this endeavour, third parties play a key role. The Need to Create New Dynamics to Make the Diplomatic Process Advance The 2007 International Crisis Group (ICG) report, ‘Out of the Impasse’, anticipated that without a change in the underlying dynamics of the conflict, efforts to find a negotiated solution on the basis of the proposals submitted by Morocco and the Polisario Front were doomed to fail. Since then, several rounds of informal talks have not even yielded an agreement on the framework for negotiations: each party continues to reject the proposal of the other as the sole basis for future negotiations even though the Polisario Front has signalled its willingness to seriously engage with Morocco’s proposal if there is reciprocity. 3 See http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2008/12/19/human-rights-western-sahara-and-tindouf-refugee-camps-0.
Recommended publications
  • 07-12-07 Guide to Women Leaders in the U
    2007 – 2008 Guide to Senior-Level Women Leaders in International Affairs in the U.S. and Abroad (As of 07/24/2007) The Women's Foreign Policy Group (WFPG) is an independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit, educational membership organization that promotes global engagement and the leadership, visibility and participation of women in international affairs. To learn more about the WFPG please visit our website at www.wfpg.org. Table of Contents Women Foreign Ministers 2 Senior-Level U.S. Women in International Affairs 4 Department of State Department of Defense Department of Labor Department of Commerce Senior-Level Women in the United Nations System 8 Women Ambassadors from the United States 11 Women Ambassadors to the United States 14 Women Ambassadors to the United Nations 16 Senior-Level Women Officials in the Organization of American States 17 Women Heads of State 19 - 1 - Women Foreign Ministers (Listed in Alphabetical Order by Country) Principality of Andorra Meritxell Mateu i Pi Republic of Austria Ursula Plassnik Barbados Dame Billie Miller Belize Lisa M. Shoman Republic of Burundi Antoinette Batumubwira Republic of Croatia Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic Republic of Ecuador Maria Fernanda Espinoza Hellenic Republic (Greece) Theodora Bakoyannis Republic of Guinea-Bissau Maria da Conceicao Nobre Cabral Republic of Hungary Kinga Goncz Republic of Iceland Ingibjorg Solrun Gisladottir State of Israel Tzipi Livni Principality of Liechtenstein Rita Kieber-Beck Republic of Malawi Joyce Banda - 2 - United Mexican States Patricia Espinosa Republic of Mozambique Alcinda Abreu State of Nepal Sahana Pradhan Federal Republic of Nigeria Joy Ogwu Republic of Poland Anna Fotyga Republic of South Africa Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma Republic of Suriname Lygia Kraag-Keteldijk United States of America Condoleezza Rice - 3 - Senior-Level U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Civilians in Violent Contexts a Field Handbook ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    From Principle to Practice: Protecting civilians in violent contexts A field handbook ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This publication has been produced as a collaboration between Australian Civil-Military Centre and the Humanitarian Advisory Group. Writing team: Dr Charles Hunt, Luisa Ryan, Kate Sutton, Beth Eggleston, Jessica Lees, Sally Airs Shevach, Alex Lia. Graphic design: Jenny Moody, A&J Moody Design Copy editing: Campbell Aitken Front Cover photo: RAMSI military welcomed on arrival. Solomon Islands 2003 Photo: © Gary Ramage, Australian Defence Humanitarian Advisory Group would like to thank the people who supported and took part in the development of this resource. Particular thanks to Dr Charles Hunt and Luisa Ryan for their input and mission to the Philippines. Disclaimer: The content is published under Creative Commons by Attribution 3.0 Australia (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/) licence. All parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in retrieval systems, and transmitted by any means without the written permission of the publisher. This document will be reviewed periodically. Your comments and suggestions are appreciated and should be sent through to [email protected] ISBN: 978-921933-28-8 Published: January 2020 From Principle to Practice: Protecting Civilians in Violent Contexts 3 FOREWORD This handbook contributes to a growing body of the milestone of both the 20-year anniversary work on what PoC looks like on the ground, and of United Nations Security Council Resolution provides the context around who is providing 1265 (1999), and the 70th-year anniversary of the protection, how and why. The evolving character ‘From Principle to Practice: Protecting civilians in violent people who serve as diplomats, in legal roles contexts’ aims to further operationalise the and in command, control and communication legal frameworks that underpin the Protection functions in the military and in international of Civilians (PoC) and bring the 2015 Australian organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Neven UN PK and State Building TL
    Ba Ne’bé: Where Are You Going? The Changing Nature of United Nations Peacekeeping in Timor Leste Doctoral Dissertation by Neven Knezevic Victoria University of Technology May 2007 Table of Contents Student Declaration ..………………………………………………………………. vi Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………... vii List of Abbreviations .…….……………………………………………………….. xii List of Tables .……………….…………………………………………………….. xv List of Diagrams .…………………..………………………………………………. xv List of Illustrations .……………………......………………………………………. xv List of Boxes ………………………………….…………………………………… xv List of Maps.……………………………………………………………………….. xv Abstract .……………………………………………..…………………………….. xvi Chapter 1 – Introduction 1.1 Setting of the Study .……………………………………………………….. 1 1.2 State-Building Background ……..……….………………………………… 3 1.3 UN Operational Phases .…………………………………………………… 5 1.4 Research Aims …………………..………………………………………… 8 1.5 Chapter Structure .…………………………………………………………. 11 Chapter 2 – State-Failure and Post-Conflict Political Reconstruction ..………. 14 2.1 Intrastate Conflict and State-Failure of the 1990s ……….……………………. 14 2.1.1 Intrastate Conflict and State-Failure: Relevant to Timor Leste? ……………………………….................................... 26 2.2 Post-Conflict Institutional Peace-building ……………...…............................... 29 2.2.1 Post-Conflict Democratisation and Citizenship-Building ………………………………….………........... 40 2.2.2 The Need for Stability and Security ………………….……………... 42 2.2.3 Deliberative Democracy as Institutional Peace-Building .………………………………………..…………….. 44 2.2.4 Democratic Peace-Building
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter August 2015 Final Desk Copy 150728.Indd
    Peace Operations Training Institute® Study peace and humanitarian relief any place, any time NEWSLETTER AUGUST 2015 Our thanks to the following nations that fi nancially support e-learning on peacekeeping: AustraliaFinland Netherlands Sweden United Kingdom National Training Centre E-Learning Platform (NTCELP) connects POTI curriculum to training centres on fi ve continents The National Training Centre E-Learning Platform (NTCELP) is in use on fi ve continents: Africa, Asia, Australia, Europe and South America. National training centres, NGOs, and other institutions are providing their students with e-learning courses by using the POTI curriculum. This results in a blended learning experience for students and a ready-made e-learning curriculum for training centres. This technological advance in training, which supplements traditional training methods, has been welcomed by the Special Committee on Peacekeeping Operations (C34) in its 2015 report. How NTCELP Works: National training centres utilizing NTCELP place a link on their website that directs students to their centre-specifi c POTI landing page. The landing page contains a welcome message from either the centre’s director or POTI. The landing page also contains a Sign Up link which enables students to quickly establish a POTI user account. As soon as a student establishes an account, he or she is able to enrol in courses. Upon successful completion of courses through this programme, students earn Certifi cates of Completion which carry the logos of, and are jointly issued by, both institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • International Organizations
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (E.S.A.) Headquarters: 8–10 Rue Mario Nikis, 75738 Paris, CEDEX 15, France phone 011–33–1–5369–7654, fax 011–33–1–5369–7651 Chairman of the Council.—Alain Bensoussan (France). Director General.—Antonio Rodota (Italy). Member Countries: Austria Germany Portugal Belgium Ireland Spain Denmark Italy Sweden Finland Netherlands Switzerland France Norway United Kingdom Cooperative Agreement.—Canada. European Space Operations Center (E.S.O.C.), Robert Bosch-Strasse 5, 61, Darmstadt, Germany, phone 011–49–6151–900, telex: 419453, fax 011–49–6151–90495. European Space Research and Technology Center (E.S.T.E.C.), Keplerlaan 1, 2201, AZ Noordwijk, Zh, Netherlands, phone 011–31–71–565–6565; Telex: 844–39098, fax 011–31–71–565–6040. Information Retrieval Service (E.S.R.I.N.), Via Galileo Galilei, Casella Postale 64, 00044 Frascati, Italy. Phone, 011–39–6–94–18–01; Telex: 610637, fax 011–39–94–180361. Washington Office (E.S.A.), Suite 7800, 955 L’Enfant Plaza SW. 20024. Head of Office.—I.W. Pryke, 488–4158, fax: (202) 488–4930, [email protected]. INTER-AMERICAN DEFENSE BOARD 2600 16th Street 20441, phone 939–6041, fax 939–6620 Chairman.—MG Carl H. Freeman, U.S. Army. Vice Chairman.—Brigadier General Jose´ Mayo, Air Force, Paraguay. Secretary.—Col. Robert P. Warrick, U.S. Air Force. Vice Secretary.—CDR Carlos Luis Rivera Cordova, Navy. Deputy Secretary for Administration.—LTC Frederick J. Holland, U.S. Army. Conference.—Maj. Robert L. Larson, U.S. Army. Finance.—Maj. Stephen D. Zacharczyk, U.S. Army. Information Management.—Maj.
    [Show full text]
  • Alternative Report by Acat-France and Fiacat on Torture and Cruel, Inhuman Or Degrading Punishment Or Treatment in France
    ALTERNATIVE REPORT BY ACAT-FRANCE AND FIACAT ON TORTURE AND CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING PUNISHMENT OR TREATMENT IN FRANCE Submitted to the Committee against Torture in the context of reviewing France's seventh periodic report 57th session, 18 April – 13 May 2016 2 ALTERNATIVE REPORT . TORTURE AND CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING PUNISHMENT OR TREATMENT IN FRANCE TORTURE AND CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING PUNISHMENT OR TREATMENT IN FRANCE . ALTERNATIVE REPORT 3 NOTE INTRODUCTIVE ACAT-France and FIACAT are honoured to submit for your consideration their concerns and recommendations pertaining to the prevention of torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment or treatment in France. This report is submitted during the review of France's seventh periodic report, to take place during the Committee's 57th session held from 18 April to 13 May 2016. ACAT-FRANCE. The Action des chrétiens pour l’abolition de la torture (Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture, or ACAT) is a Paris-based Christian NGO for the defence of human rights that was founded in 1974 and has been recognised as being of public use. Basing its action on international law and acting for the benefit of all, without prejudice to ethnicity, ideology or religion, ACAT-France fights against torture and for the abolition of the death penalty, the protection of victims and in defence of the right to asylum, drawing on a network of almost 39,000 members and donors. In particular, it plays a supervisory role with regard to action taken by responsive institutions such as the police, the gendarmerie, the justice system or the prison administration system.
    [Show full text]
  • Nowhere to Turn Report
    NOWHERE TO TURN: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE FAILURE TO MONITOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN WESTERN SAHARA AND TINDOUF REFUGEE CAMPS NOWHERE TO TURN: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE FAILURE TO MONITOR HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN WESTERN SAHARA AND TINDOUF REFUGEE CAMPS ROBERT F. KENNEDY CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS 2 NOWHERE TO TURN: THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE FAILURE TO MONITOR HUMAN RIGHT VIOLATIONS IN WESTERN SAHARA AND TINDOUF REFUGEE CAMPS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Sahrawi are the indigenous people of Western Sahara, who descended from Berber and Arab tribes.1 The following is a report on the human rights situation facing the Sahrawi people who reside in the disputed territory of Western Sahara under Moroccan control and in the Sahrawi refugee camps near Tindouf, Algeria. Much of the information contained in this report is based on information gained from interviews and meetings during a visit to the region of an international delegation led by the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights (RFK Center). For nearly 40 years, both the Kingdom of Morocco and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguía el Hamra and Río de Oro (POLISARIO Front) have claimed sovereignty over Western Sahara, a former Spanish colony. After years of armed conflict, in 1991 the United Nations (UN) established the Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO), a peacekeeping mission to oversee the cease-fire between the Kingdom of Morocco and the POLISARIO Front and to organize and ensure a referendum on self-determination. Today, 22 years after the establishment of MINURSO, the referendum has yet to take place.
    [Show full text]
  • Program European Association of Peace
    Conflux Center for Intercultural Dialogue and Mediation, Belgrade EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION OF PEACE OPERATIONS TRAINING CENTERS SEVENTH ANNUAL MEETING 16 – 18 April 2019 Belgrade, Serbia PROGRAM \ 16th APRIL, TUESDAY 11:00 Arrival of Participants and Registration - Venue: Hotel M 13:15 Participants are kindly requested to take their seats 13:30 – 15:00 OPENING CEREMONY Chairperson: Ivan Mrkić, President of Conflux Center Special Address: Aleksandar Vulin, Minister of Defence, Republic of Serbia Speakers: Mark Pedersen, Chief, Integrated Training Services, UN Department of Peace Operations Jibecke Joensson, UN-EU Partnership on Peace Operations and Crisis Management, Crisis management and Planning Directorate, European External Action Service Tarik Ndifi, Conflict Prevention Centre, OSCE Col. Milivoje Pajović, Chief, Peacekeeping Operations Centre, Serbian Armed Forces 15:00 -– 15:30 COFFEE BREAK 15:30 -– 17:00 REPORTS FROM LAST YEAR'S IAPTC AND EAPTC MEETINGS Chairperson: Miloš Strugar, Executive Director of Conflux Center Speakers: Col. Helen Cooper, Deputy Chief of the New Zealand Army President of the International Association of Peacekeeping Training Centres – IAPTC Joint presentation by the Co-hosts of the Sixth Annual Meeting of the EAPTC in Geneva Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP), Centre for the Democratic Control of the Armed Forces (DCAF), Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD), and Small Arms Survey 17:00 – 19:00 IDEAS BAZAAR & CYBER LAB The Bazaar will provide space for the participants to present their institutions, programmes and publications, and to interact with other participants. Cyber Lab will showcase different new technologies that can be applied in peacekeeping, from 3-D printers, crypto currencies, virtual reality films, augmented reality films, animated training videos, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to Crises: Are Current Policies and Practices the Answer?
    RESPONDING TO CRISES: ARE CURRENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES THE ANSWER? Doubt is widely expressed whether the United Nations can cope with the large increase in peace-keeping demands that have been made on it in recent years. Experience shows there is every reason to believe that it can. But assuring that it does will require both administrative reforms and a new commitment of resources and purpose from member countries, including some of those now expressing doubts. Julian Harston Dans bien des milieux, on met en doute l’aptitude des Nations Unies à répondre aux demandes, de plus en plus nombreuses ces dernières années, d’interventions pour le maintien de la paix. Or, l’expérience montre qu’on a toute raison de croire l’ONU à la hauteur de cette tâche. Pour cela, cependant, il lui faudra non seulement se réformer sur le plan administratif, mais aussi compter sur un plus ferme appui et de plus vastes ressources de la part des pays membres, y compris de certains d’entre eux qui expriment aujourd’hui des doutes à son égard. efore dissecting the capabilities of the UN, I’d like to sions have been launched. Peacekeepers were usually sent to start by calling attention to Canada’s extraordinary cope with conflict between states. Today, peacekeeping B contribution to the UN in general and to peacekeep- forces are more often deployed to deal with civil conflict, in ing in particular. In 1948, Canada began its proud tradition which one or more of the parties are warlords. of participation in UN peacekeeping missions, starting with Some commentators have claimed that the UN is UNTSO (the UN Truce Supervision Operation) in the Middle unable to perform any tasks beyond “old” peacekeeping.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Violations in Western Sahara Date Victim Location Description Category Source More Info of Reported Vialation
    ANNEX Human Rights Violations in Western Sahara Date Victim Location Description Category Source More info of reported vialation 01.04.2014 Almoujahid Mayara, El Aaiún 38 year-old Almoujahid Mayara and 20 year-old Arbitrary detention Sahara Press Service spsrasd.info, Hajoub Khatari, Hajoub Khatari were arrested following their partic- (SPS), CODESA codesaso.com Larabas Sleima ipation in pro-independence protests on 28 March. Unfair trial (in Spanish), They were reportedly detained violently without codesaso.com information as to why they were arrested or where (in Spanish). they were being taken. On 1 April, they were taken to the court of first instance. Their trial was post- poned until 7 April. They were arrested on charges of possession of cannabis and weapons, but the two Saharawis allege that these charges are fabricated. In the end, Mayara and Khatari were tried on 14 April and sentenced to 6 and 1 years respectively. Their case was then taken to the Court of Appeal, scheduled for 15 May but then postponed several times until it finally took place on 5 June. Mayara’s sentence was reduced to 4 years, whilst Katari’s remained the same. Larabas Sleima was reportedly arrested following his participation in a pro-independence demonstration on 28 March 2014, the same one as Mayara and Khatari. He was charged, in the same trial as Mayara and Khatari on 1 April, with violence against a woman. According to Sahara Press Service, the woman that was the so-called victim of their violence attended court and informed the judge that the charges were false.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Sahara 2016 Human Rights Report
    WESTERN SAHARA 2016 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT Note: This report was updated 3/29/17; see Appendix F: Errata for more information. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Kingdom of Morocco claims the territory of Western Sahara and administers the estimated 85 percent that it controls. The Popular Front for the Liberation of Saguia el Hamra and Rio de Oro (POLISARIO), an organization that seeks the territory’s independence, disputes Morocco’s claim to sovereignty over the territory. Moroccan and POLISARIO forces fought intermittently from 1975, when the Spanish Government relinquished colonial authority over the territory, until a 1991 cease-fire and the establishment of a UN peacekeeping mission. Since 1991, UN-facilitated negotiations on the territory’s status have been inconclusive. The sides have not met face-to-face since 2009. Morocco administers the territories in Western Sahara by the same laws and structures governing the exercise of civil liberties and political and economic rights as internationally recognized Morocco. In 2011 Morocco adopted a constitution that also applies to its administration of the territory. Morocco is a constitutional monarchy under which ultimate authority rests with King Mohammed VI, who presides over the Council of Ministers. The king may dismiss ministers, dissolve parliament, and call for new elections or rule by decree. The king shares executive authority with the head of government (prime minister), whom he must appoint from the political party with the most seats in parliament, and approves members of the government nominated by the prime minister. International and domestic observers judged the October 7 parliamentary elections, held in both internationally recognized Morocco and the territory of Western Sahara, as credible and relatively free from irregularities.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 01 Nov 11.Indd
    ISO 9001:2008 CERTIFIED NEWSPAPER Sunday 11 November 2012 26 Dhul-Hijja 1433 - Volume 17 Number 5515 Price: QR2 Qatar capable Al Shamal stun of facing shale Al Wakra; Qatar gas challenges SC thrashed Business | 21 Sport | 29 www.thepeninsulaqatar.com [email protected] | [email protected] Editorial: 4455 7741 | Advertising: 4455 7837 / 4455 7780 Kuwait marks 50 Khalfan fires years of charter KUWAIT CITY: Kuwait yesterday marked the golden jubilee of its constitu- tion with a spectacular $15m fireworks fresh salvo at display which earned the state a place in the Guinness Book of World Records. “I am happy to verify that with 77,282 fire- works, a new Guinness world record has been set tonight” in Kuwait City, a representative Brotherhood of Guinness World Records announced on Kuwait television at the end of the display. On November 11, 1962, the late Emir Islamist body ‘dividing Sunnis’ Sheikh Abdullah Al Salem Al Sabah promul- gated the constitution for Kuwait to become DOHA: Controversial Dubai leader of one of the biggest the first Arab state in the Gulf to issue a Police Chief Dhahi Khalfan Arab countries, who should constitution and have a parliament. has fired a fresh salvo at the actually be opposing Israel, is The Emir H H Sheikh Sabah Al Ahmad Muslim Brotherhood and said fondly describing its president Al Sabah reiterated in a televised speech the that while Ayatollah Khomeini as ‘dear friend’.” government’s unwavering commitment to divided Muslims along sectar- Taking another dig at Mursi democracy and called for national unity as ian lines (Shias and Sunnis), and his Brotherhood-led rule the state goes through a bitter political crisis.
    [Show full text]