Arts in Seattle
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Cultural Resource Collective Info Packet
Current Member Organizations Organization — City Primary Contact 5th Avenue Theatre — Seattle Reesa Nelson, Marketing and Engagement Manager ACT Theatre — Seattle Amy Gentry, Director of Sales & Marketing ArtsFund — Seattle Katy Corella, CRC Coordinator ArtsWest — Seattle Michael Wallenfels, Marketing Manager Book-It Repertory Theatre — Seattle Glen Miller, Director of Marketing & Communications Capella Romana — Portland, OR Mark Powell, Executive Director Early Music Seattle — Seattle Gus Denhard, Director of Marketing Flying House Productions — Seattle Chelsea Sadler, Marketing Director Museum of History & Industry — Seattle Mariely Lemagne, Membership Program Manager Museum of Glass — Tacoma Michelle Verkooy, Membership Manager Museum of Northwest Art — La Conner Christopher Shainin, Executive Director Nordic Heritage Museum — Seattle Jan Woldseth Colbrese, Deputy Director of External Afffairs Northwest Boychoir & Vocalpoint! Seattle — Seattle Maria Johnson, Executive Director Pacific Northwest Ballet — Seattle Lia Chiarelli, Director of Marketing & Communications Pacific Science Center — Seattle Rob Wiseman, Director of Individual Giving Seattle Aquarium — Seattle Marika Wegerbauer, Philanthropy Database Specialist Seattle Art Museum — Seattle Cindy McKinley, Senior Marketing Manager Seattle Arts & Lectures — Seattle Amelia Peacock, Community Engagement Coordinator Seattle Chamber Music Society — Seattle Seneca Garber, Director of Marketing Seattle Children’s Theatre — Seattle Kanani Reichlin, Sales and Database Coordinator Seattle -
Square Feet 2013
Square Feet 2013 Wrap-up Report Square Feet 2013 : a wrap-up report Published by the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture in January 2014 Edited by Matthew Richter Event Photographs by Jenny Crooks Introduction Square Feet 2013 convened on Monday, November 18, 2013 to explore the idea of Cultural Districts as a way to support the work of artists and arts and cultural organizations in Seattle. The event was produced by the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture and 4Culture. Centered on a keynote address from creative placemaking expert Anne Gadwa Nicodemus, the day also featured presentations from twenty local projects in motion, and a working session that resulted in a $10,000 investment by the Office of Arts & Culture in an idea generated by the day’s attendees. Over 150 people, representing arts organizations, independent artists, funders, developers, property owners, architectural designers and consultants, universities, and local government took part in the day, which was hosted by the Lee Center for the Arts, the Northwest Film Forum, and the Velocity Dance Center, all on 12th Avenue on Capitol Hill. A note about the text of this report: We solicited the presenters’ remarks following the event for inclusion in this report. Some of the speakers had prepared remarks, some spoke from general notes, and some spoke extemporaneously. We have attempted to present all of these in a format that makes sense to the reader. Matthew Richter, Cultural Space Liaison from the Office of Arts & Culture, started the day with some opening remarks: Welcome to Square Feet 2013, a day-long event produced by the Seattle Office of Arts & Culture and 4Culture. -
Agenda (9:45) A
Transportation Policy Board Thursday, November 12, 2020 • 9:30 AM – 11:30 AM Virtual Meeting via Teleconference The meeting will be streamed live over the internet at www.psrc.org ******************************************************************************************************* PUBLIC NOTICE: In accordance with the Governor’s proclamations 20-25.7 and 20-28.11, the PSRC’s offices are closed to the public and no in-person meetings are permitted. The current Open Public Meetings Act waiver is scheduled to expire on November 9. Should any major changes to current guidance occur, this meeting may be rescheduled. The public is encouraged to follow the meeting via live stream at https://www.psrc.org/boards/watch-meetings or listen by phone at 1-888-475-4499, Meeting ID: 993 9174 0720, Passcode: 209081. Members of the public may submit comments via email to [email protected] up to one hour before the meeting and comments will be provided to Board members electronically during the meeting. Comments received after that deadline will be provided to Board members after the meeting. ******************************************************************************************************* 1. Call to Order (9:30) - Mayor Becky Erickson, Chair 2. Communications and Public Comment 3. Report of the Chair 4. Director's Report 5. Consent Agenda (9:45) a. Approve Minutes of Transportation Policy Board Meeting held October 8, 2020 6. Discussion Item (9:50) a. Regional Equity Strategy Update -- Charles Patton, PSRC 7. Discussion Item (10:15) a. Regional Transportation Plan Outreach -- Gil Cerise and Maggie Moore, PSRC 8. Discussion Item (10:30) a. Specialized Transportation Services Outreach -- Gil Cerise and Jean Kim, PSRC 9. Discussion Item (10:45) a. -
Redefining Urban Food Systems to Identify Optimal Rooftop Community Garden Locations
REDEFINING URBAN FOOD SYSTEMS TO IDENTIFY OPTIMAL ROOFTOP COMMUNITY GARDEN LOCATIONS: A SITE SUITABILITY ANALYSIS IN SEATTLE, WASHINGTON by Ana E. Stoudt A Thesis Presented to the FACULTY OF THE USC GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE (GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY) May 2015 Copyright 2015 Ana E. Stoudt i DEDICATION I dedicate this paper to my parents, friends, and coworkers for their constant support throughout this entire process. Without them, I would not have made it here today. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am forever grateful to my advisor, Professor Warshawsky, for his encouragement and guidance throughout this experience. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. iii LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................................................... x ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. -
Bustersimpson-Surveyor.Pdf
BUSTER SIMPSON // SURVEYOR BUSTER SIMPSON // SURVEYOR FRYE ART MUSEUM 2013 EDITED BY SCOTT LAWRIMORE 6 Foreword 8 Acknowledgments Carol Yinghua Lu 10 A Letter to Buster Simpson Charles Mudede 14 Buster Simpson and a Philosophy of Urban Consciousness Scott Lawrimore 20 The Sky's the Limit 30 Selected Projects 86 Selected Art Master Plans and Proposals Buster Simpson and Scott Lawrimore 88 Rearview Mirror: A Conversation 100 Buster Simpson // Surveyor: Installation Views 118 List of Works 122 Artist Biography 132 Maps and Legends FOREWORD WOODMAN 1974 Seattle 6 In a letter to Buster Simpson published in this volume, renowned Chinese curator and critic Carol Yinghua Lu asks to what extent his practice is dependent on the ideological and social infrastructure of the city and the society in which he works. Her question from afar ruminates on a lack of similar practice in her own country: Is it because China lacks utopian visions associated with the hippie ethos of mid-twentieth-century America? Is it because a utilitarian mentality pervades the social and political context in China? Lu’s meditations on the nature of Buster Simpson’s artistic practice go to the heart of our understanding of his work. Is it utopian? Simpson would suggest it is not: his experience at Woodstock “made me realize that working in a more urban context might be more interesting than this utopian, return-to-nature idea” (p. 91). To understand the nature of Buster Simpson’s practice, we need to accompany him to the underbelly of the city where he has lived and worked for forty years. -
2016 Washington State Public Transportation Plan
2016 WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Washington State Public Transportation Plan CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 LETTER FROM ACTING SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 9 TITLE VI NOTICE TO PUBLIC AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) INFORMATION 10 KEY T HEMES OF THE WASHINGTON STATE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN 12 INTRODUCTION 13 THE STATE’S INTEREST IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 14 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TO MEET OUR STATE'S AND RESIDENTS' DIVERSE NEEDS 17 CHAPTER 1: PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION TODAY IN WASHINGTON STATE 19 USE OF THE TERM PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IN THIS DOCUMENT 19 EXAMPLES OF MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION 20 DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS 22 AREAS OF POVERTY MAP 30 ECONOMIC TRENDS 34 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT 35 TRENDS IN TECHNOLOGY AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 36 CONCLUSION 39 CHAPTER 2: A DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORK FOCUSED ON SYSTEM PERFORMANCE AND MULTIMODAL INTEGRATION 41 THE STATE ROLE IN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 42 MOVING TOWARD AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM: PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS 43 CASE STUDIES 45 DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 49 EXAMPLES OF CURRENT REPORTING: 50 AN APPROACH TO SYSTEM PERFORMANCE 51 CHAPTER 3: GOALS AND ACTION STRATEGIES 53 GOAL 1: THRIVING COMMUNITIES 57 GOAL 2: ACCESS 66 GOAL 3: ADAPTIVE TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY 72 GOAL 4: CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE 78 GOAL 5: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM GUARDIANSHIP 83 CONCLUSION 88 2 WSDOT | June 2016 | www.wsdot.wa.gov/transit Washington State Public Transportation Plan Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VISION: All transportation partners in Washington state will work together to provide a system of diverse and integrated public transportation options. People throughout the state will use these options to make transportation choices that enable their families, communities, economy and environment to thrive. -
Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to Be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents
DOWNTOWN ACCESS STRATEGY PHASE 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years Table of Contents I. Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 II. Review of Existing Plans, Projects, and Programs ......................................... 2 III. Potential Construction Concerns and Opportunities .................................. 3 A. Existing Construction Planning Tools 3 B. SDOT’s Construction Hub Coordination Program 4 C. Construction Mitigation Strategies Used by Other Cities 7 D. Potential Construction Conflicts and Opportunities 10 IV. Future Transportation Network Opportunities ......................................... 12 A. North Downtown 12 B. Denny Triangle / Westlake Hub 14 C. Pioneer Square / Chinatown-ID 15 D. Downtown Core and Waterfront 16 V. Future Phases of Downtown Access Strategy ............................................. 18 A. Framework for Phase 2 (2014 through 2016) 18 B. Framework for Phase 3 (Beyond 2016) 19 - i - September 25, 2013 Downtown Access Strategy Phase 1 Context Setting: Projects to be Constructed in the Next 10 Years I. INTRODUCTION Many important and long planned transportation and development projects are scheduled for con- struction in Downtown Seattle in the coming years. While these investments are essential to support economic development and job growth and to enhance Downtown’s stature as the region’s premier location to live, work, shop and play, in the short-term they present complicated challenges for con- venient and reliable access to and through Downtown. The Downtown Seattle Association (DSA) and its partners, Historic South Downtown (HSD) and the Seat- tle Department of Transportation (SDOT), seek to ensure that Downtown Seattle survives and prospers during the extraordinarily high level of construction activity that will occur in the coming years. -
ALASKAN WAY VIADUCT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement
ALASKAN WAY VIADUCT REPLACEMENT PROJECT Final Environmental Impact Statement APPENDIX L Economics Discipline Report Submitted by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF Prepared by: PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF J U L Y 2 0 1 1 Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project Final EIS Economics Discipline Report The Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project is a joint effort between the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), and the City of Seattle. To conduct this project, WSDOT contracted with: Parsons Brinckerhoff 999 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, WA 98104 In association with: Coughlin Porter Lundeen, Inc. EnviroIssues, Inc. GHD, Inc. HDR Engineering, Inc. Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Magnusson Klemencic Associates, Inc. Mimi Sheridan, AICP Parametrix, Inc. Power Engineers, Inc. Shannon & Wilson, Inc. William P. Ott Construction Consultants SR 99: Alaskan Way Viaduct Replacement Project July 2011 Economics Discipline Report Final EIS This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Build Alternatives Overview ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Overview of Bored Tunnel Alternative (Preferred) .......................................................................... -
Title Page: Arial Font
2016 IACC Conference - S24 Heritage Project 10/19/2016 Funding Heritage Capital Projects Funding? Does the project your organization is planning involve an historic property or support access to heritage? If so… it may be eligible for state HCP funding. WASHINGTON STATEExamples: HISTORICAL SOCIETY GRANT FUNDS FOR CAPITAL PROJECTS Historic Seattle PDA – Rehabilitation of THAT SUPPORT HERITAGE Washington Hall IACC CONFERENCE 2016 - OCTOBER 19, 2016 City Adapts and Reuses Old City Hall Park District Preserves Territorial History Tacoma Metropolitan Parks City of Bellingham - 1892 Old City Hall Preservation of the Granary at the Adaptively Reused as Whatcom Museum Fort Nisqually Living History Museum Multi-phased Window Restoration Project Point Defiance Park, Tacoma Suquamish Indian Nation’s Museum City Restores Station for Continued Use The Suquamish Indian Nation Suquamish Museum Seattle Dept. of Transportation King Street Station Restoration 1 2016 IACC Conference - S24 Heritage Project 10/19/2016 Funding Small Town Renovates its Town Hall City Builds Park in Recognition of History City of Tacoma – Chinese Reconciliation Park Town of Wilkeson – Town Hall Renovation Port Rehabilitates School and Gym Public Facilities District Builds New Museum Port of Chinook works with Friends of Chinook School – Chinook School Rehabilitation as a Community Center Richland Public Facilities District –The Reach City Preserves & Interprets Industrial History City Plans / Builds Interpretive Elements City of DuPont Dynamite Train City of Olympia – Budd Inlet Percival Landing Interpretive Elements 2 2016 IACC Conference - S24 Heritage Project 10/19/2016 Funding Port: Tourism as Economic Development Infrastructure That Creates Place Places and spaces – are social and community infrastructure Old and new, they connect us to our past, enhance our lives, and our communities. -
Seattle Center History / Timeline
SEATTLE CENTER HISTORY / TIMELINE 1853 David Denny files a land claim for a tract that more than a century later will become the site of Century 21Exposition. 1881 Saloonkeeper James Osborne bequeaths $20,000 to build a civic hall for social and cultural gatherings. His gift is eventually augmented by public funding. 1886 David and Louse Boren Denny donate land for the civic hall. 1927 A public bond passes and construction begins on Civic Auditorium. Civic Field opens. 1928 Mayor Bertha K. Landis dedicates the Civic Center Complex. 1939 Washington National Guard Armory is dedicated. 1947 High School Memorial Stadium opens. 1948 Un-American Activities hearings on alleged communist acts take place in the Armory. 1951 Memorial Wall honoring Seattle high school students killed in WW II is dedicated. 1954 City Council member Al Rochester proposes the idea that Seattle host a world’s fair to mark the 50th anniversary of the Alaska-Yukon-Pacific Exposition of 1909. 1956 World's Fair Commission votes unanimously to coordinate the World' Fair program with the city effort to develop a civic center at and around the Civic Auditorium. Seattle voters approve a $7.5 million bond issue for building and land acquisition in the vicinity of Civic Auditorium. 1957 World’s Fair Commission receives authorization from Washington Governor Albert Rosellini to hold a fair in Seattle in 1960, and Washington State Legislature approves $7.5 million in funding for the World's Fair. World’s Fair theme changes from a celebration of the 1909 A-Y-P to Century 21 following the USSR’s Sputnik launch. -
Mar 09 ALL Compressed.Pub
EHC CELEBRATING COMMCOMMUNITYUNITY SINCE 1980 Ethnic Heritage Council M A R C H 2 0 0 9 EHC Annual Awards Dinner March 27, 2009 @ NHM Please join us for our 28 th Annual ers, Raman was trained in Carnatic Awards Dinner, Friday, March 27, music which he has performed and 2009, Celebrated at Nordic Heri- taught to 100’s of Indian kids, pro- th tage Museum, 3014 NW 67 St., viding a rare opportunity to those by Photo JalSchrof EHC © Seattle, WA 98117. Tickets: $40. that made this land their home to Pre-Paid Reservations Only. Reser- keep their heritage alive. vation Deadline: Friday, March The Aspasia Phoutrides Pulakis 20, 2009 . Reservation form: Memorial Award is given annually www.ethnicheritagecouncil.org or Join us in honoring Martha Brice , to an individual who has contrib- call: 206-443-1410 to make your Peter Pawluskiewicz & Nat V. Raman , uted significantly to a Northwest reservation. at EHC’s 28th Annual Awards Dinner ethnic community. Photo above: Tlingit member, Gene Evening Schedule: 6pm - Social Tagaban, performing at EHC’s 2007 This year we have two honorees, Hour & Museum Tour; La Mez- Naturalization Ceremony. Martha is an Peter Pawluskiewicz of the Polish zanotte Strolling Musicians ; 7pm - adopted member of the Tlingit People. community, and Martha Brice , International Cuisine Dinner by adopted member of the Tlingit Peo- IKEA. Following Dinner: EHC Board ples. Peter Pawluskiewicz has Ethnic Heritage Council’s Introductions; Awards Ceremony; brought together people from his Cultural Performances & Raffle. birth land of Poland and those 28th Annual In 2009 we honor 3 members of our “Polish at heart” through music, Awards Dinner local ethnic communities—leaders language and laughter. -
C Ulture Office Of
OFFICE OF CULTURE Letter from the Mayor 02 Contents Letter from Randy Engstrom and Michael Seiwerath 04 Creative | Youth 08 Creative | Community 14 Creative | Space 24 Staff 35 Seattle Arts Commission 36 Financials 38 Contact Us 41 I want Seattle to become one of the best arts cities in the world. —Mayor Ed Murray As Mayor, I am committed to helping Seattle to become one of the best arts cities in the world. Our city is already one of the most vibrant and creative in the nation. People are drawn to Seattle’s thriving arts and music scenes and the rich diver- sity of its communities. Businesses are attracted to Seattle because we are an international cultural hub. We understand both the real human value of art and its economic potential. Here in Seattle, we make the arts a priority. Last year, the City invested almost $2.5 million in the arts. We funded more than 300 different arts and cultural organizations and artists that reached over 1.5 million people. This year our support for the arts is growing. With support from City Council, we have added $150,000 for our Arts Mean Business program, which underwrites jobs for cultural organizations serving historically under-represented communities. And as part of the Creative Advantage program, we are investing $500,000 to bring arts education back to the classroom. These investments in the arts improve educational opportunity and achievement, foster economic development, and contrib- ute to our ongoing pursuits of social and economic justice. Thank you for supporting our city with your time, energy and vision.