DOCSLIB.ORG

Sigve Soldal Bjorstad Head of Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sigve Soldal Bjorstad Head of Information Making a difference EEA and Norway Grants Sigve Soldal Bjorstad Head of information EEA Seminar 27 May 2010 Text White TheTHE EEA EEA GRANTS and AND Norway NORWAY GRANTSGrants A contribution from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway to reduce social and economic disparities within the European Economic Area 16 years of support The EEA EFTA States have contributed with cohesion support ever since the European Agreement entered into force in 1994 Financial Mechanism (1994-1998) Financial Instrument (1999-2003) Donor states: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway (Austria, Finland, Sweden) Beneficiary states: Greece, Ireland, Northern Ireland, Portugal, Spain Funding size FM 94-98: EUR 500 million + interest rebates on EUR 1.5 bill of EIB loans Funding size FI 99-03: EUR 119.6 million Sectors: Environment, Education and training, Transport No. of projects FM 94-98: 56 No. of projects FI 99-03: 25 2004-2009 15 beneficiary states 3 donor states 1.3 billion euro 1250 grants THEThree EEA components GRANTS AND NORWAY GRANTS EEA Grants EUR 672 million Norway Grants EUR 567 million The Norwegian Cooperation Programmes with Bulgaria and Romania EUR 68 million* *administered separately by Innovation Norway Norway represents 97% of the total EUR 1.3 billion contribution Beneficiaries Public authorities Local 25% ½ of the funding goes to public authorities National 19% Regional 7% ¼ of the support goes to Institutions/organisations education, research Educat./research 12% and NGOs NGOs 12% Only a small proportion is Business allocated to companies Private owned 4% Public owned 2% Partnerships PARTNERSHIPS Strengthening bilateral cooperation • 320 partnership projects “The cooperation established with Norwegian and Icelandic fellows due to the EEA and Norway Grants • 1 in 3 are in Poland is of significant value to Polish researchers.” • 2 in 3 research projects -Professor Barbara Kurdycka, Minister of Science and Higher Education • Polish-Norwegian research fund – EUR 25 mill in support to additional bilateral research projects PARTNERSHIPS 9 3 out of 5 research projects are based on bilateral partnerships 9Research funds earmarked bilateral partnerships 9 Environment and health research Geological CO2 storage in Czech Rep. Portuguese-Norwegian cancer research: The Czech Geological Survey and the In collaboration with Rikshospitalet International Research Institute of University Hospital in Norway, researchers Stavanger are charting possible sites for at Porto University are working to increase future CO2 capture and geological storage in awareness of gastric and cervix cancer. the Czech Republic. Does it make a difference? Mid-term Evaluation Popular, appreciated and visible Positive conclusions -Highly popular and appreciated in the BS -Highly visible in the BS -Funds and programmes appear most successful Negative conclusions -Inefficiencies in implementation have led to delays -Delays have led to losses for beneficiaries -Lack of clear objectives, supported by indicators and targets Review Reduction of greenhouse gases • 164 projects • Cost efficient contribution • 114,6 million euro • Adressees a funding gap • 60% in Poland • Recommends continued focus on energy efficiency • Mostly renewable energy, energy and change of heating efficiency systems in public buildings in Central Europe A similar review showed that energy consumption is expected to drop by more than 50% in public buildings through these projects Review Preserving biodiversity • 52 projects • Contributes to national and international biodiversity • 49 million euro obligations • Mostly flora/fauna • Contributes to research to establish key data to assist with species and habitats protection and management • Calls for increased awareness raising on these issues NGOs Strengthening civil society Key facts: “Building democracies is a • 19 NGO funds continuous task, and.. the • 12 countries EEA and Norway Grants is • EUR 85 million in support unique.., funding the • 1860 projects development of active civic participation.” - Kuba Wygnanski, Polish civil Background society activist • A young and vulnerable sector in many countries • Former international donors have shifted focus further east or south • The financial crisis has hit the NGO- sector hard NGO funds Fund example Polish NGO-fund • EUR 37.5 in grants • the largest single grant • Will support over 500 projects Focus areas: • Democracy and civil society • Environmental protection and sustainable development • Equal opportunities and social integration NGO projects Fighting discrimination. Pro Humanum organises training for senior police officers in identifying and combating discriminatory attitudes and practices in the Polish police force. Green mobility. The organisation Ožuvení has been awarded funding by the Czech NGO fund to promote walking and cycling Integrating Roma. An integration and talent as alternative modes of transport. training programme that enrolls Roma children and youth from poor, deprived families in Slovakia is implemented by Pro Donum. 2009-2014 15 beneficiary states Reducing economic and 3 donor states social disparities 1.79 billion euro EEA Grants AND 988.5 mln euro Norway Grants Strengthening bilateral 800 mln euro relations NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT 9 PROGRAMME APPROACH – Managed by national operators – funds will be channelled through programmes established under various priority sectors in the beneficiary states 9 BILATERAL RELATIONS AS AN OVERALL GOAL – Partnerships at programme level – Partnerships at project level PRIORITY SECTORS EEA Grants Norway Grants • Environmental protection • Carbon capture and storage and management (CCS) • Climate change and • Green industry innovation renewable energy • Research and scholarship • Academic research • Human and social • Human and social development development • Promotion of decent work • Civil society and tripartite dialogue • Protecting cultural heritage • Justice and home affairs Timeline 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Negotiate Ratify MoU- Establishing Calls for Implementation agreement negotiat. programmes projects of projects http://www.eeagrants.org/id/1506 www.eeagrants.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    SLOVAKIA Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 113 million has been allocated to support a number of cooperation programmes with Slovakia through the EEA and Norway Grants. The programmes are designed to help Slovakia tackle important social and economic challenges and to pave the way for closer Norwegian– Slovakian cooperation in a number of areas. Business development, climate change and combating violence against women are key areas for cooperation. Cross-border cooperation with Ukraine and efforts to create equal opportu- nities for the Roma population are also included. A total of nine Norwegian government agencies and institutions will be involved in imple- menting these programmes and in recruiting Norwegian project partners. EUR 20 million Business and innovation cooperation EUR 18.22 million Climate change EUR 9 million Violence against women EUR 8.5 million Good governance/Cross-border cooperation with Ukraine 3 May June to September 28 November From December By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreements signed Negotiations Agreements signed Development of pro- Reallocation of Completion of the by Norway and between Norway by Norway and grammes and open reserve 2014-2021 funding Slovakia and Slovakia Romania calls for proposals period 2016 2020 2024 Updated: December 2020 SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Statistics Population Competitiveness 20.58 million 5.2 5.4 Social Inclusion 15.00 Area km2 385 170 49 035 Energy and Climate Change 18.22 GDP per capita in EUR 69 890 15 860 Culture and Good
    [Show full text]
  • VADEMECUM on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019
    VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 Image credits: © Shutterstock Document prepared by the European Institute of Cultural Routes, September 2019. Please inform the Institute about any updates. Contact: [email protected] Vademecum on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... I Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. III Nature and Structure of the Vademecum ..................................................................................... V EUROPEAN UNION ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to EU Funding .................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................... 7 Creative Europe ...................................................................................................................... 7 Europe for Citizens ................................................................................................................. 7 COSME ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • O5.1 DBS Gateway Region Funding Guidelines.Pdf
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Funding Guidlines WP 5 – Activity 5.1 Novi Sad, June 2018 WP5 – Funding Guideline Project DBS Gateway Region – Regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Funding Guideline Nature Report, Output O 5.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date June 2018 Number of Pages 143 Authors IPA PP1 UNS team Contributors Checked by Approved by Introduction 2 WP5 – Funding Guideline CONTENT 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Project description ............................................................................................................. 9 1.2 The objectives and structure of the Funding Guideline ................................................... 10 2 Overview of existing financing instruments ............................................................................. 11 3 Description of financing instruments ....................................................................................... 15 3.1 European Investment Bank (EIB) ...................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Eligibility.................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Assessment and selection process ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Partner Search in Cultural Cooperation Projects in the EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021
    Norwegian partner search in Cultural Cooperation projects in the EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 In order to get the best results from your search for partners for the EEA and Norway Grants, the Arts Council Norway recommends completing the following form. The text boxes that make up the form are based on feedback that we have received from Norwegian cultural players. Tailoring the information to the potential partner/potential partner type as opposed to sending a generic request, always yields the best results. The form can be used for partnership requests sent directly to identified, potential partners, as well as those sent to the Arts Council Norway [email protected] and Programme Operators. It can also be used for Norwegian entities seeking partners in the Beneficiary States. This form will be published on our website. Name of organisation The Centre for Slovak Literature/ Literárne informačné centrum Country Slovakia Name of contact person Petra Mikulasova Position Manager for Slovak Literature Abroad Telephone number 00421 907 472 214 0047 462 157 14 Email address [email protected] Website www.litcentrum.sk Your organisation The Centre for Slovak Literature is an organisation underlying the Slovak Describe the type of Ministry of Culture. Our two main working areas are: organisation and include a 1) reach out to the broad public and inform about Literature in Slovakia good description of your own areas of activity/fields • through an online catalogue about Slovak writers and everything that is (Visual arts,
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    POLAND Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 809.3 million has been allocated to a number of cooperation programmes with Poland through the EEA and Norway Grants. These programmes are designed to strengthen cooperation between Norway and Poland and to promote social and economic development in Poland. Our cooperation in the fields of business, research and innovation is strengthened, emphasising green and climate friendly solutions. We will also contribute to increased energy efficiency and to the reduction of Poland’s CO2 emissions. Our support to civil society is sizeable and important and contributes to the promotion of democratic values and human rights. Twelve Norwegian agencies are involved as partners in implementing the programmes, and are providing assistance with the recruitment of Norwegian project partners. EUR 140 million Energy, the environment and climate change EUR 110 million Research EUR 85 million Innovation and business development EUR 78 million Justice and home affairs 3 May June 2016 to From January November 2017 20 December 2018 By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreement on the EEA and Norway Negotiations Signing of agreement Development of Reallocation of reserve Completion of the Grants for 2014-2021 between Norway between Norway programmes and 2014-2021 funding signed between and Poland and Poland open calls for period Norway and the EU proposals 2016 2017 2018 2020 2024 Updated: December 2020 Statistics SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Population million 5.2 38.6 Competitiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    GREECE Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 116.7 million has been allocated to a number of cooperation programmes with Greece through the EEA and Norway Grants. These programmes are designed to strengthen cooperation between Norway and Greece and to promote social and economic development in Greece. The close cooperation in the asylum and migration sector will be continued, with a focus on unaccompanied minors and other vulnerable groups. Business development will be strengthened with a new programme on green industry development, blue growth and ICT. Other key areas are climate and environment, poverty alleviation and Roma inclusion and empowerment. Norwegian agencies are involved as partners in two of the programmes, and will assist with the recruitment of Norwegian project partners. EUR 33 million Asylum and migration EUR 21.5 million Innovation and business development EUR 12 million Civil society EUR 11.5 million Climate and environment 3 May May to September 31 October From November By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreement on the EEA Negotiations Signing of agreement Development of Reallocation of reserve Completion of the and Norway Grants between Norway and between Norway and programmes and 2014-2021 funding for 2014-21 signed Greece Greece open calls for period between Norway and proposals the EU 2016 2017 2020 2024 Statistics SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Population million 5.2 10.9 Competitiveness 21.5 Area km2 385 170 131 960 Social inclusion 11.50 GDP per capita in EUR 67.1 16.3
    [Show full text]
  • SLOVAKIA Vegard Unger Ellefsen, the Ellefsen, Unger Vegard © Civil Protection for Directorate Norwegian
    SLOVAKIA Vegard Unger Ellefsen, the Ellefsen, Unger Vegard © Civil Protection for Directorate Norwegian 2004-2009 2009-2014 2014-2021 TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL FUNDING €70.3M €80.75M €113.1M EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS €32.3M €38M €38.35M €42.4M €54.9M €58.2M PRIORITY AREAS 2009-2014 2014-2021 Supporting judicial reform, tackling cross-border and Increasing the competitiveness of Slovak enterprises organised crime Fighting poverty and improving living conditions for the Improving the situation of vulnerable groups, including the Roma population Roma population Continuing cross border cooperation with Ukraine Boosting green innovation and entrepreneurship Supporting social and economic development through Strengthening civil society to promote social justice, culture democracy and sustainable development Supporting victims of domestic and gender-based violence COUNTRY FACTS Slovakia EU-27 GDP per capita in PPS (EU=100) 77 100 Economic growth (% change on previous year) 3.3 2.00 Unemployment rate (%)* 4.9 7.6* Youth unemployment rate (%)* 18.6 16.8* Public debt (% of GDP) 51.8 83.2 Gender pay gap (%) 19 16.3 At-risk-of-poverty rate (%) 18.1 23.5 Human development index ** 21 (EU-27 ranking) Corruption perception index* 21 (EU-27 ranking) Sources: Eurostat/UNDP/Transparency International All data is from 2016, except where * indicates 2017 and ** indicates 2015. All data is from EU-27, except where ~ indicates EU-28. SLOVAKIA 2009-2014 PERIOD PROGRAMMES UNDER THE EEA AND NORWAY GRANTS
    [Show full text]
  • UK Funding from the EU
    1 Commons Library Briefing, 31 August 2016 BRIEFING PAPER Number 7847, 29 December 2016 By Steven Ayres UK Funding from the EU Contents: 1. Introduction to EU Funding 2. European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds 3. European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 4. Direct funding from the Commission 5. Funding from other EU institutions 6. Arrangements for non Member States 7. Current status of post-Brexit funding www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibraryContents 2 UK Funding from the EU Summary 3 1. Introduction to EU Funding 4 1.1 EU Budget Allocation and Expenditure 4 1.2 Member State comparisons 6 1.3 UK expenditure 9 2. European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds 10 2.1 What are the ESI Funds? 10 2.2 Management of the funds 10 2.3 Who benefits from ESI funds? 11 How are ESI funds distributed across the EU? 12 Allocations across the UK 13 Funding by region 13 England – funding by Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) 14 2.4 The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) 15 2.5 Other ESI funds 17 Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) 17 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 17 Territorial cooperation 17 2.6 Funding by sector 18 2.7 National co-financing 19 2.8 Progress of the funds 20 3. European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 21 4. Direct funding from the Commission 23 Horizon 2020 23 Erasmus+ 24 Other funds 24 5. Funding from other EU institutions 26 5.1 European Investment Bank (EIB) 26 The EIB and the UK 26 5.2 European Investment Fund (EIF) 27 6.
    [Show full text]
  • EEA and Norway Grants Digital Communication Services
    EEA and Norway Grants digital communication services Terms of Reference for Framework Agreement (s) on digital communication services for the EEA and Norway Grants www.eeagrants.org EEA and Norway Grants Financial Mechanism Office Boulevard du Régent 47-48 1000 Brussels, Belgium 1. Introduction The Financial Mechanism Office (FMO), the secretariat of the EEA and Norway Grants (hereinafter referred to as “FMO”) seeks to establish a Framework Agreement with one – three Contractors for the provision of digital communication services, in accordance with the specifications set out in the tender documents. Background The EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 (The Grants) represent the financial contribution of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (donor countries) to reduce social and economic disparities in Europe and strengthen bilateral relations with 15 countries in Central and Southern Europe. The Grants are composed of two financial mechanisms; the EEA Grants financed by all three donor countries, and the Norway Grants, financed by Norway alone. The three donor countries have contributed to the European cohesion efforts ever since the EEA Agreement entered into force on 1 January 1994. The year 2019 shall mark the 25th Anniversary of the European Economic Area Agreement and the birth of the EEA and Norway Grants. This occasion shall require close cooperation with the Contractor. During the funding period 2009-2014, €1.8 billion was set aside under the Grants. For the period 2014-2021, the funding has been increased to €2.8 billion. During the 2009-2014 funding period, the funds were channelled to over 7 000 projects through 150 thematic programmes. The programmes for the 2014-2021 are still in the drafting stage, the final number of programmes is therefore not available at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • €27.6 Domestic and Gender-Based Violence Is a Violation of Fundamental Rights with Respect to Dignity, Equality and Justice
    Domestic and gender-based violence EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 €27.6 Domestic and gender-based violence is a violation of fundamental rights with respect to dignity, equality and justice. million in Through the EEA and Norway Grants, funding Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway support programmes that counter gender-based violence in eight Beneficiary States. © Christophe Vander Eecken Programmes will be implemented through: EEA and Beneficiary Norway Open calls Pre-defined 8 States Grants for proposals ! projects Why focus on domestic and Where we work gender-based violence? EEA Grants Norway Grants Total An estimated one in three women in the EU have experienced physical Czech Republic - 5.0 5.0 violence since the age of 15. Some 3.7 million women have experienced Estonia 0.5 0.5 1.0 sexual violence. Gender-based violence represents a major obstacle to Latvia 1.8 1.8 the achievement of full equality between men and women. The effects Lithuania 3.1 3.1 of violence on a victim’s health, both physical and psychological, can be Poland 6.2 6.2 severe. Despite efforts to counter such violence, it remains an Portugal 0.9 - 0.9 extensive and widely under-reported human rights abuse, with young Romania - 2.1 2.1 women and girls being particularly vulnerable. Slovakia - 7.5 7.5 What is supported? Amounts are in million € and for the period 2014-2021. The figures are subject to change until all relevant programme Our support in the area of domestic and gender-based violence covers agreements are signed in all countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Strategy for the Czech Republic - EEA and Norway Grants 2009 - 2014
    Communication Strategy for the Czech Republic - EEA and Norway Grants 2009 - 2014 Naviga 4, s.r.o., Pernerova 293/11, 186 00 Praha 8, [email protected], www.naviga4.c z Communication Strategy for the Czech Republic - EEA and Norway Grants 2009-2014 CONTENTS 1 METHODOLOGIES FOR PROCESSING THE COMMUNICATION PLAN OF EEA AND NORWAY GRANTS ....... 3 2 ANALYSIS OF THE INITIAL SITUATION ...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Overview of the Communication Activities .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Media relations ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.2 Direct Communication ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.3 Online Communication .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.4 Publication Activities ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.5 Recommendations for Realization of the Prospective Communication Activities ........................... 9 2.2 Attitudes of the Czech Public towards Chosen Field of Life ............................................................... 10 2.3 Conclusions of the Analysis of the Initial Situation ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Communication and Design Manual
    COMMUNICATION AND DESIGN MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS THE MANUAL IS DIVIDED IN TWO PARTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 PART ONE : COMMUNICATION GUIDANCE.................................................................................................................................... 4 PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 COMMUNICATION PLAN ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 COMMUNICATION AND DESIGN MANUAL PRINT AND PUBLICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 PHOTO MATERIAL & AUDIOVISUAL .........................................................................................................................................11 WEBSITES .................................................................................................................................................................................... 12 SOCIAL MEDIA .............................................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]