The EEA Agreement and Norway's Other Agreements with the EU

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The EEA Agreement and Norway's Other Agreements with the EU Meld. St. 5 (2012–2013) Report to the Storting (White Paper) The EEA Agreement and Norway’s other agreements with the EU Translation from the Norwegian. For information only. Contents 1 Introduction ................................. 5 2.5.2 Norway’s participation in crisis 1.1 Purpose and scope ........................ 5 management and military 1.2 Norway’s cooperation with capacity building ........................... 33 the EU ............................................. 6 2.5.3 Dialogue and cooperation ............ 33 1.3 The content of the White Paper .. 8 2.6 Summary of actions the Government intends to take ......... 34 2 Norway’s options within the framework of its 3 Key priorities in Norway’s agreements with the EU ........... 9 European policy ......................... 36 2.1 Introduction .................................... 9 3.1 Norwegian companies and value 2.2 Early involvement in creation in the internal market .... 36 the development of policy 3.2 Key policy areas ............................. 37 and legislation ............................... 9 3.2.1 Labour relations and social 2.3 Management of welfare ............................................ 37 the EEA Agreement ...................... 11 3.2.2 Energy ............................................. 40 2.3.1 Assessment of EEA relevance ..... 12 3.2.3 The environment, climate 2.3.2 Possible adaptations when change and food safety .................. 42 incorporating new legal acts into 3.2.4 Cooperation on research the EEA Agreement ...................... 16 and education ................................. 44 2.3.3 Bodies with powers to make 3.2.5 Rural and regional policy .............. 46 decisions that are binding 3.2.6 Market access for Norwegian on authorities, companies or seafood ........................................... 48 individuals ....................................... 17 3.3 The Nordic countries and 2.3.4 The options available when Europe ............................................ 48 implementing EEA legislation 3.4 Summary of actions the in Norway ...................................... 19 Government intends to take .......... 49 2.3.5 The surveillance and court system: Norway’s approach .......... 22 4 Key instruments of Norway’s 2.3.6 Article 102 procedures .................. 24 European policy .......................... 51 2.4 Management of agreements 4.1 Information and knowledge ......... 51 in the area of justice and 4.2 Transparency and inclusion ......... 53 home affairs ................................... 25 4.3 EU/EEA expertise in the public 2.4.1 The Schengen cooperation .......... 26 administration ................................ 53 2.4.2 Development of cooperation 4.4 Close coordination of in other justice and home EU/EEA-related work in affairs areas .................................... 28 the public administration .............. 54 2.5 Cooperation on foreign and 4.5 Mutual responsibility for security policy ................................ 30 managing the EEA Agreement .... 55 2.5.1 Opportunities for Norwegian 4.6 Summary of actions the involvement .................................... 30 Government intends to take .......... 56 The EEA Agreement and Norway’s other agreements with the EU Meld. St. 5 (2012–2013) Report to the Storting (White Paper) Recommendations of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of 12 October 2012, approved by the Council of State on the same day. (Government Stoltenberg II) 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope and interests of the parties to the Agreement in the ongoing EEA cooperation. The expression The Norwegian Government’s European policy is “mutual responsibility” is used to mean that both based on the Agreement on the European Eco- parties should follow up the Agreement in a cor- nomic Area (the EEA Agreement) and Norway’s rect and responsible way that secures the quality other agreements with the EU. The EEA Agree- and efficiency of the cooperation. ment links Norway to the EU’s internal market Generally speaking, Norway benefits from the and forms the foundation of Norway’s European development of common rules and standards for policy. This White Paper will therefore not discuss the European market. In cases where the develop- other forms of association with the EU. ment of legislation is not compatible with Norwe- As set out in the Government’s policy plat- gian interests, the Government will use the oppor- form, the Government will pursue an active Euro- tunities and available options provided by the pean policy and will work proactively to safeguard Agreement to safeguard Norway’s interests. Norwegian interests vis-à-vis the EU. In this White Paper, the expression “available It is important for Norway that the EEA coop- options” is used to describe the opportunities the eration is effective, flexible and that it ensures Government has to influence how Norwegian mutual responsibility. Here, the word “effective” is companies and Norwegian citizens are affected by used to mean that the EEA Agreement should the EEA Agreement and other aspects of Nor- ensure equal treatment and predictability for Nor- way’s cooperation with the EU. The expression is wegian actors, as well as the greatest possible therefore used to describe both the opportunities degree of Norwegian participation in EU pro- the Norwegian authorities have to influence the cesses. The word “flexible” is used to mean that content of EU legislation, and how, and to what due account should be taken of the varying needs extent, the legislation should be implemented at 6 Meld. St. 5 (2012–2013) Report to the Storting (White Paper) 2012–2013 The EEA Agreement and Norway’s other agreements with the EU the national level. An awareness of the available was with a view to ensuring that Norway would be options that exist at any given time is essential for able to participate in the internal market that was the sound management of Norway’s agreements being developed in the European Community with the EU. (EC). In the view of the Storting, safeguarding The main purpose of this White Paper is to Norwegian companies’ equal access to the West- promote the sound management of Norway’s ern European market was important for the Nor- agreements with the EU. It is crucial to ensure the wegian economy and value creation. The EEA proper follow-up of the agreements, including the Agreement established a dynamic and homoge- best possible use of the options available to Nor- nous economic area that ensured this. way. This is essential not least in the light of the There are close links between Norway and the far-reaching changes the EU has undergone in EU countries due to historical and cultural ties, recent years, for example enlargements to include geographical proximity, common values and a a number of new member states, treaty reforms, shared commitment to the rule of law and human new modes of governance, and most recently rights. Norway has therefore also chosen to changes as a result of the financial crisis in develop its cooperation and agreements with the Europe. EU in areas outside the framework of the EEA In its European policy, the Government will Agreement. This applies to judicial and police focus its main efforts on areas of particular impor- cooperation, questions relating to asylum and tance to Norway. In following up Norway’s agree- immigration policy, and foreign policy and secu- ments with the EU, the Government will promote rity policy issues. To a great extent, Norway has openness and awareness-raising, and will give pri- taken the initiative to develop and strengthen its ority to enhancing knowledge and ensuring sound cooperation with the EU in these areas. Succes- management. sive Norwegian governments have been guided At the beginning of 2010, the Government by a common recognition of the need for transna- appointed a broad-based expert committee, the tional cooperation in order to address transna- EEA Review Committee, to review Norway’s tional problems, and have sought to further experience of the EEA Agreement and its other develop Norway’s cooperation with the EU in agreements with the EU. The aim was to obtain these areas, with broad support in the Storting. the best possible body of knowledge on Norway’s The EEA Agreement has been in force for agreements and cooperation arrangements with almost 19 years, and this period has mostly been the EU. The committee, chaired by Professor one of stability and economic growth for Norway. Fredrik Sejersted, presented its report on 17 Janu- The Agreement has remained an effective frame- ary 2012 (Official Norwegian Report NOU 2012: 2 work for economic relations between the coun- Outside and Inside: Norway’s agreements with the tries in the EEA, at a time when there have been European Union). The report is far-reaching and substantial changes in the EU cooperation, partic- thorough. It contributes to the establishment of a ularly the enlargements to include 12 new mem- sound body of knowledge as a basis for further ber states and changes to the founding treaties. developing Norway’s European policy. The Europe is now dealing with the repercussions report’s main conclusions, final remarks and sum- of the crisis that hit the global economy in 2008. maries of consultative comments are reproduced Most European countries have felt the economic in the Appendix of this White Paper (in the Nor- effects of the crisis, many have also been affected wegian version only). Other organisations and socially and politically. So far Norway has been actors have also helped to foster a broad debate spared the
Recommended publications
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    SLOVAKIA Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 113 million has been allocated to support a number of cooperation programmes with Slovakia through the EEA and Norway Grants. The programmes are designed to help Slovakia tackle important social and economic challenges and to pave the way for closer Norwegian– Slovakian cooperation in a number of areas. Business development, climate change and combating violence against women are key areas for cooperation. Cross-border cooperation with Ukraine and efforts to create equal opportu- nities for the Roma population are also included. A total of nine Norwegian government agencies and institutions will be involved in imple- menting these programmes and in recruiting Norwegian project partners. EUR 20 million Business and innovation cooperation EUR 18.22 million Climate change EUR 9 million Violence against women EUR 8.5 million Good governance/Cross-border cooperation with Ukraine 3 May June to September 28 November From December By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreements signed Negotiations Agreements signed Development of pro- Reallocation of Completion of the by Norway and between Norway by Norway and grammes and open reserve 2014-2021 funding Slovakia and Slovakia Romania calls for proposals period 2016 2020 2024 Updated: December 2020 SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Statistics Population Competitiveness 20.58 million 5.2 5.4 Social Inclusion 15.00 Area km2 385 170 49 035 Energy and Climate Change 18.22 GDP per capita in EUR 69 890 15 860 Culture and Good
    [Show full text]
  • UNION NOW with BRITAIN, by Clarence K. Streit. Harper & Brothers, Publishers, New York, 1941
    Louisiana Law Review Volume 4 | Number 1 November 1941 UNION NOW WITH BRITAIN, by Clarence K. Streit. Harper & Brothers, Publishers, New York, 1941. Pp. xv, 240. Jefferson B. Fordham Repository Citation Jefferson B. Fordham, UNION NOW WITH BRITAIN, by Clarence K. Streit. Harper & Brothers, Publishers, New York, 1941. Pp. xv, 240., 4 La. L. Rev. (1941) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol4/iss1/27 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Reviews UNION Now WITH BRITAIN, by Clarence K. Streit. Harper & Brothers, Publishers, New York, 1941. Pp. xv, 240. Mr. Streit developed his idea of a federal union of national states before the war broke out. In 1939 he articulated it in Union Now, wherein he proposed that initially the union should be composed of fifteen democracies, namely, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Eire, Finland, France, Holland, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. Hitler has forced a revision of this scheme by overrunning five of the eight non-Englishspeaking countries in this group and isolating the remaining three. The present volume accordingly urges United States union now with the other Englishspeaking democracies. A common language, a predominantly common racial strain, and a common legal, political and cultural heritage are cohesive ele- ments that strongly favor the present lineup over the original plan.
    [Show full text]
  • VADEMECUM on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019
    VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 VADEMECUM ON SOURCES OF FUNDING FOR THE CULTURAL ROUTES OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE 2019 Image credits: © Shutterstock Document prepared by the European Institute of Cultural Routes, September 2019. Please inform the Institute about any updates. Contact: [email protected] Vademecum on Sources of Funding for the Cultural Routes of the Council of Europe 2019 Foreword ...................................................................................................................................... I Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. III Nature and Structure of the Vademecum ..................................................................................... V EUROPEAN UNION ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to EU Funding .................................................................................................... 1 ................................................................................................................... 7 Creative Europe ...................................................................................................................... 7 Europe for Citizens ................................................................................................................. 7 COSME ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • O5.1 DBS Gateway Region Funding Guidelines.Pdf
    Project co-funded by the European Union funds (ERDF, IPA) Funding Guidlines WP 5 – Activity 5.1 Novi Sad, June 2018 WP5 – Funding Guideline Project DBS Gateway Region – Regional and Transport Development in the Danube-Black Sea Region towards a Transnational Multiport Gateway Region Code DTP1-050-3.1 Funds ERDF, IPA Document Title Funding Guideline Nature Report, Output O 5.1 Available Languages English Version 1 Date June 2018 Number of Pages 143 Authors IPA PP1 UNS team Contributors Checked by Approved by Introduction 2 WP5 – Funding Guideline CONTENT 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Project description ............................................................................................................. 9 1.2 The objectives and structure of the Funding Guideline ................................................... 10 2 Overview of existing financing instruments ............................................................................. 11 3 Description of financing instruments ....................................................................................... 15 3.1 European Investment Bank (EIB) ...................................................................................... 15 3.1.1 Eligibility.................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.2 Assessment and selection process ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Norwegian Partner Search in Cultural Cooperation Projects in the EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021
    Norwegian partner search in Cultural Cooperation projects in the EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 In order to get the best results from your search for partners for the EEA and Norway Grants, the Arts Council Norway recommends completing the following form. The text boxes that make up the form are based on feedback that we have received from Norwegian cultural players. Tailoring the information to the potential partner/potential partner type as opposed to sending a generic request, always yields the best results. The form can be used for partnership requests sent directly to identified, potential partners, as well as those sent to the Arts Council Norway [email protected] and Programme Operators. It can also be used for Norwegian entities seeking partners in the Beneficiary States. This form will be published on our website. Name of organisation The Centre for Slovak Literature/ Literárne informačné centrum Country Slovakia Name of contact person Petra Mikulasova Position Manager for Slovak Literature Abroad Telephone number 00421 907 472 214 0047 462 157 14 Email address [email protected] Website www.litcentrum.sk Your organisation The Centre for Slovak Literature is an organisation underlying the Slovak Describe the type of Ministry of Culture. Our two main working areas are: organisation and include a 1) reach out to the broad public and inform about Literature in Slovakia good description of your own areas of activity/fields • through an online catalogue about Slovak writers and everything that is (Visual arts,
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    POLAND Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 809.3 million has been allocated to a number of cooperation programmes with Poland through the EEA and Norway Grants. These programmes are designed to strengthen cooperation between Norway and Poland and to promote social and economic development in Poland. Our cooperation in the fields of business, research and innovation is strengthened, emphasising green and climate friendly solutions. We will also contribute to increased energy efficiency and to the reduction of Poland’s CO2 emissions. Our support to civil society is sizeable and important and contributes to the promotion of democratic values and human rights. Twelve Norwegian agencies are involved as partners in implementing the programmes, and are providing assistance with the recruitment of Norwegian project partners. EUR 140 million Energy, the environment and climate change EUR 110 million Research EUR 85 million Innovation and business development EUR 78 million Justice and home affairs 3 May June 2016 to From January November 2017 20 December 2018 By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreement on the EEA and Norway Negotiations Signing of agreement Development of Reallocation of reserve Completion of the Grants for 2014-2021 between Norway between Norway programmes and 2014-2021 funding signed between and Poland and Poland open calls for period Norway and the EU proposals 2016 2017 2018 2020 2024 Updated: December 2020 Statistics SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Population million 5.2 38.6 Competitiveness
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe
    GREECE Working Together for a Green, Competitive and Inclusive Europe EUR 116.7 million has been allocated to a number of cooperation programmes with Greece through the EEA and Norway Grants. These programmes are designed to strengthen cooperation between Norway and Greece and to promote social and economic development in Greece. The close cooperation in the asylum and migration sector will be continued, with a focus on unaccompanied minors and other vulnerable groups. Business development will be strengthened with a new programme on green industry development, blue growth and ICT. Other key areas are climate and environment, poverty alleviation and Roma inclusion and empowerment. Norwegian agencies are involved as partners in two of the programmes, and will assist with the recruitment of Norwegian project partners. EUR 33 million Asylum and migration EUR 21.5 million Innovation and business development EUR 12 million Civil society EUR 11.5 million Climate and environment 3 May May to September 31 October From November By 2020 30 April 2024 Agreement on the EEA Negotiations Signing of agreement Development of Reallocation of reserve Completion of the and Norway Grants between Norway and between Norway and programmes and 2014-2021 funding for 2014-21 signed Greece Greece open calls for period between Norway and proposals the EU 2016 2017 2020 2024 Statistics SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED BY SECTOR 2014-2021 in mill EUR Population million 5.2 10.9 Competitiveness 21.5 Area km2 385 170 131 960 Social inclusion 11.50 GDP per capita in EUR 67.1 16.3
    [Show full text]
  • SLOVAKIA Vegard Unger Ellefsen, the Ellefsen, Unger Vegard © Civil Protection for Directorate Norwegian
    SLOVAKIA Vegard Unger Ellefsen, the Ellefsen, Unger Vegard © Civil Protection for Directorate Norwegian 2004-2009 2009-2014 2014-2021 TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL FUNDING TOTAL FUNDING €70.3M €80.75M €113.1M EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS EEA GRANTS NORWAY GRANTS €32.3M €38M €38.35M €42.4M €54.9M €58.2M PRIORITY AREAS 2009-2014 2014-2021 Supporting judicial reform, tackling cross-border and Increasing the competitiveness of Slovak enterprises organised crime Fighting poverty and improving living conditions for the Improving the situation of vulnerable groups, including the Roma population Roma population Continuing cross border cooperation with Ukraine Boosting green innovation and entrepreneurship Supporting social and economic development through Strengthening civil society to promote social justice, culture democracy and sustainable development Supporting victims of domestic and gender-based violence COUNTRY FACTS Slovakia EU-27 GDP per capita in PPS (EU=100) 77 100 Economic growth (% change on previous year) 3.3 2.00 Unemployment rate (%)* 4.9 7.6* Youth unemployment rate (%)* 18.6 16.8* Public debt (% of GDP) 51.8 83.2 Gender pay gap (%) 19 16.3 At-risk-of-poverty rate (%) 18.1 23.5 Human development index ** 21 (EU-27 ranking) Corruption perception index* 21 (EU-27 ranking) Sources: Eurostat/UNDP/Transparency International All data is from 2016, except where * indicates 2017 and ** indicates 2015. All data is from EU-27, except where ~ indicates EU-28. SLOVAKIA 2009-2014 PERIOD PROGRAMMES UNDER THE EEA AND NORWAY GRANTS
    [Show full text]
  • UK Funding from the EU
    1 Commons Library Briefing, 31 August 2016 BRIEFING PAPER Number 7847, 29 December 2016 By Steven Ayres UK Funding from the EU Contents: 1. Introduction to EU Funding 2. European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds 3. European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 4. Direct funding from the Commission 5. Funding from other EU institutions 6. Arrangements for non Member States 7. Current status of post-Brexit funding www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibraryContents 2 UK Funding from the EU Summary 3 1. Introduction to EU Funding 4 1.1 EU Budget Allocation and Expenditure 4 1.2 Member State comparisons 6 1.3 UK expenditure 9 2. European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds 10 2.1 What are the ESI Funds? 10 2.2 Management of the funds 10 2.3 Who benefits from ESI funds? 11 How are ESI funds distributed across the EU? 12 Allocations across the UK 13 Funding by region 13 England – funding by Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) 14 2.4 The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) 15 2.5 Other ESI funds 17 Youth Employment Initiative (YEI) 17 European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 17 Territorial cooperation 17 2.6 Funding by sector 18 2.7 National co-financing 19 2.8 Progress of the funds 20 3. European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) 21 4. Direct funding from the Commission 23 Horizon 2020 23 Erasmus+ 24 Other funds 24 5. Funding from other EU institutions 26 5.1 European Investment Bank (EIB) 26 The EIB and the UK 26 5.2 European Investment Fund (EIF) 27 6.
    [Show full text]
  • EEA and Norway Grants Digital Communication Services
    EEA and Norway Grants digital communication services Terms of Reference for Framework Agreement (s) on digital communication services for the EEA and Norway Grants www.eeagrants.org EEA and Norway Grants Financial Mechanism Office Boulevard du Régent 47-48 1000 Brussels, Belgium 1. Introduction The Financial Mechanism Office (FMO), the secretariat of the EEA and Norway Grants (hereinafter referred to as “FMO”) seeks to establish a Framework Agreement with one – three Contractors for the provision of digital communication services, in accordance with the specifications set out in the tender documents. Background The EEA and Norway Grants 2014-2021 (The Grants) represent the financial contribution of Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway (donor countries) to reduce social and economic disparities in Europe and strengthen bilateral relations with 15 countries in Central and Southern Europe. The Grants are composed of two financial mechanisms; the EEA Grants financed by all three donor countries, and the Norway Grants, financed by Norway alone. The three donor countries have contributed to the European cohesion efforts ever since the EEA Agreement entered into force on 1 January 1994. The year 2019 shall mark the 25th Anniversary of the European Economic Area Agreement and the birth of the EEA and Norway Grants. This occasion shall require close cooperation with the Contractor. During the funding period 2009-2014, €1.8 billion was set aside under the Grants. For the period 2014-2021, the funding has been increased to €2.8 billion. During the 2009-2014 funding period, the funds were channelled to over 7 000 projects through 150 thematic programmes. The programmes for the 2014-2021 are still in the drafting stage, the final number of programmes is therefore not available at this time.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by the Presidency of the WEU Permanent Council on the Termination of the Brussels Treaty (Brussels, 31 March 2010)
    Statement by the Presidency of the WEU Permanent Council on the termination of the Brussels Treaty (Brussels, 31 March 2010) Caption: Statement made on 31 March 2010 by the Presidency of the Permanent Council of Western European Union (WEU) regarding the termination of the Modified Brussels Treaty and the closure of WEU (due to take place in June 2011). This statement follows the entry into force of the 2007 Treaty of Lisbon on 1 December 2009, particularly the mutual assistance clause between the Member States of the European Union (Article 42(7), EU Treaty). Source: Statement of the Presidency of the Permanent Council of the WEU on behalf of the High Contracting Parties to the Modified Brussels Treaty – Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. Brussels: Western European Union, 31.03.2010. 2 p. http://www.weu.int/index.html. Copyright: (c) WEU Secretariat General - Secrétariat Général UEO URL: http://www.cvce.eu/obj/statement_by_the_presidency_of_the_weu_permanent_council_on_the_termination_of_the_bru ssels_treaty_brussels_31_march_2010-en-1ed29c90-5d6c-49f5-9886-48accc17dfbb.html Last updated: 22/06/2015 1 / 4 22/06/2015 WESTERN EUROPEAN UNION Statement of the Presidency of the Permanent Council of the WEU on behalf of the High Contracting Parties to the Modified Brussels Treaty – Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom Brussels, 31 March 2010 2 / 4 22/06/2015 3 / 4 22/06/2015 Statement of the Presidency of the Permanent Council of the WEU on behalf of the High Contracting Parties to the Modified Brussels Treaty – Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom The Western European Union has made an important contribution to peace and stability in Europe and to the development of the European security and defence architecture, promoting consultations and cooperation in this field, and conducting operations in a number of theatres, including Petersberg tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Justice for Janitors Goes Dutch
    7 Justice for Janitors goes Dutch Precarious labour and trade union response in the cleaning industry (1988-2012): a transnational history* Abstract Precarious labour has been on the rise globally since the 1970s and 1980s. Changing labour relations in the cleaning industry are an example of these developments. From the 1970s onwards, outsourcing changed the position of industrial cleaners fundamentally: subcontracting companies were able to reduce labour costs by recruiting mainly women and immigrants with a weak position in the labour market. For trade unions, it was hard to find a way to counteract this tendency and to organize these workers until the Justice for Janitors (J4J) campaigns, set up by the us-based Service Employees International Union (seiu) from the late 1980s, showed that an adequate trade union response was possible. From the mid-2000s, the seiu launched a strategy to form international coalitions outside the United States. It met a favourable response in several countries. In the Netherlands, a campaign modelled on the J4J repertoire proved extraor- dinarily successful. In this chapter, transnational trade unionism in the cleaning industry based on the J4J model will be analysed with a special focus on the Dutch case. How were local labour markets and trade union actions related to the transnational connections apparent in the rise of multi-national cleaning companies, the immigrant workforce, and the role of the seiu in promoting international cooperation between unions? Keywords: outsourcing, precarious work, precariat, cleaners, janitors, organizing, transnationalism, regulatory unionism, industrial relations, The Netherlands * Reprinted from Ad Knotter, ‘Justice for Janitors Goes Dutch. Precarious Labour and Trade Union Response in the Cleaning Industry (1988-2012): A Transnational History’, International Review for Social History 62(1) (2017), 1-35.
    [Show full text]