Virophages Question the Existence of Satellites

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virophages Question the Existence of Satellites CORRESPONDENCE LINK TO ORIGINAL ARTICLE LINK TO AUTHOR’S REPLY located in front of 12 out of 21 Sputnik coding sequences and all 20 Cafeteria roenbergensis Virophages question the virus coding sequences (both promoters being associated with the late expression of genes) existence of satellites imply that virophage gene expression is gov- erned by the transcription machinery of the Christelle Desnues and Didier Raoult host virus during the late stages of infection. Another point concerns the effect of the virophage on the host virus. It has been argued In a recent Comment (Virophages or satel- genome sequences of other known viruses that the effect of Sputnik or Mavirus on the lite viruses? Nature Rev. Microbiol. 9, 762– indicates that the virophages probably belong host is similar to that observed for STNV and 763 (2011))1, Mart Krupovic and Virginija to a new viral family. This is further supported its helper virus1. However, in some cases the Cvirkaite-Krupovic argued that the recently by structural analysis of Sputnik, which infectivity of TNV is greater when inoculated described virophages, Sputnik and Mavirus, showed that MCP probably adopts a double- along with STNV (or its nucleic acid) than should be classified as satellite viruses. In a jelly-roll fold, although there is no sequence when inoculated alone, suggesting that STNV response2, to which Krupovic and Cvirkaite- similarity between the virophage MCPs and makes cells more susceptible to TNV11. Such Krupovic replied3, Matthias Fisher presented those of other members of the bacteriophage an effect has never been observed for Sputnik two points supporting the concept of the PRD1–adenovirus lineage9. With the size of or Mavirus, for which a negative effect on the virophage: first, Sputnik and Mavirus are not the Sputnik particle, the nature and com- host virus is always obtained. In addition, a defective particles but fully functional viruses, plexity of its genome, and the presence of a satellite virus has never been shown to pro- and second, they have been shown (at least ready-to-use set of viral RNAs in the virion10, duce a ‘diseased’ form of its helper virus or in silico) to divert the machinery of the host Sputnik challenges the current definition of (even though rare with Sputnik) to be fully virus, rather than that of the host cell, for satellite viruses, which relies on the idea of a encapsidated within it. genome replication and transcription. defective particle or subviral agent. Here, we want to go beyond semantics A virophage has ecological and evolutionary and look at the problem another way. We A virophage is a parasite of another virus. To significance. By predating on giant viruses propose a remodelled classification based on illustrate the similarity between the depend- such as members of the families Mimiviridae our previously suggested bipartite system of ence of a satellite virus on the helper virus or Phycodnaviridae, virophages regulate viral capsid-encoding organisms (CEOs) and ribo- and the dependence of a virophage on its viral population dynamics and probably influence some-encoding organisms (REOs)4, which, host, Krupovic and Cvirkaite-Krupovic used the whole microbial food web. In a recent in addition to the existing viruses of Bacteria the example of the satellite tobacco necro- study, Yau et al. used a Lotka–Volterra simula- (bacteriophages), Eukarya and Archaea, sis virus (STNV), the single-stranded RNA tion to model the effect of a virophage on the would incorporate a new group called ‘viruses genome of which is replicated by the phycodnavirus–green alga interaction8. The of Viruses’, encompassing virophages and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of addition of a virophage to this system led to traditional satellite RNA viruses. the helper virus, TNV1. We believe that this an increase in the survival of the host algal cell is equivalent to comparing cows and apples. population and a deviation of the microbial What is a virophage? As the single-stranded RNA genomes serve loop towards secondary production. A virophage is a viral parasite of giant viruses, directly as mRNA, the replication cycle of the The presence of genes from different viral thriving by exploiting the machinery of the STNV–TNV couple does not have a transcrip- origins in the Sputnik genome has stressed viral host for genome replication and tran- tion stage. In addition, the RdRp is a typical the role of Sputnik as a probable vehicle for scription, impairing production of the viral viral enzyme that is not found in eukaryotic, gene transfer among viruses5. In addition, host and causing the generation of abnormal bacterial or archaeal genomes, so to repli- on the basis of the similarities between the and degenerated forms of the viral host5. cate, STNV has no choice but to rely on this Mavirus genome and transposable elements enzyme. As an alternative (although still of the Maverick–Polinton family, it has even A virophage is a virus. Sputnik (the first imperfect) comparison, a parallel could have been suggested that large DNA transposons virophage described)5 and the recently dis- been made with the adeno-associated virus found in eukaryotic genomes emerged from covered Mavirus6 are particles of about (AAV)–adenovirus system, as both are DNA a virophage ancestor6. 50 nm diameter, with double-stranded DNA viruses. Following the AAV example, and as The presence of numerous giant virus genomes of 18,343 bp and 19,063 bp cod- is the case for DNA viruses of comparable and virophage signatures in environmental ing for 21 and 20 ORFs, respectively. Both size, the Sputnik genome would be expected metagenomic data sets suggests that, as for possess structural (for example, major cap- to transit into the nucleus, where it would be bacteriophages in the ocean12,13, virophages sid protein (MCP)) and non structural (for replicated and transcribed by the host cell are common in the environment and play an example, polymerase and genome-packaging machinery. However, recent in situ hybridi- unrecognized part in regulating virus–host ATPase) proteins. As the Sputnik and Mavirus zation experiments have shown that the interactions and contributing to global gene genomes harbour their own capsid-encoding Sputnik infection cycle has no nuclear phase flow in the virosphere. genes, they are consistent with the defini- and that genome replication takes place inside tion of viruses as CEOs4,7. The absence of the viral factory, with a maximum of activity What is a satellite virus? significant similarities between the genome at 6–7 hours post-infection (C.D. and D.R., The International Committee on Taxonomy sequences of Sputnik, Mavirus and Organic unpublished observations). In addition, the of Viruses (ICTV) describes satellite viruses Lake virophage (OLV; a virophage sequence previously described polyadenylation signals as “subviral agents lacking genes that could identified from metagenomic data)8 and and the AT‑rich conserved promoter motifs encode functions needed for replication and NATURE REVIEWS | MICROBIOLOGY www.nature.com/reviews/micro © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved CORRESPONDENCE Christelle Desnues and Didier Raoult are at the depending on the co-infection of a host cell CEOs with a helper virus for their multiplication” Unité de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses et tropicales émergentes, Unité mixte de recherche (REFS 14,15) Viruses of Bacteria . Unlike satellite nucleic acids, Centre national de la recherche scientifique 6236, satellite viruses also encode a structural pro- Viruses of Eukarya L’Institut de recherche pour le développement 198, tein that encapsidates their genome. Until the Aix-Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France. release of Virus Taxonomy. Ninth Report of the Viruses of Archaea Viruses of Viruses International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses Correspondence to D.R. (on 8 November 2011)15, the satellite viruses e‑mail: [email protected] were classified in a unique category, itself sub- 1. Krupovic, M. & Cvirkaite-Krupovic, V. Virophages or satellite viruses? Nature Rev. Microbiol. 9, 762–763 divided into two subgroups: subgroup 1, with (2011). the chronic bee-paralysis virus-associated sat- Other Other 2. Fischer, M. G. Sputnik and Mavirus: more than just satellite viruses. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 10, 78 (2012). ellite virus as representative, and subgroup 2, 3. Krupovic, M. & Cvirkaite-Krupovic, V. Sputnik and with satellites that resemble STNV. Thus, Mavirus: not more than satellite viruses. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 10, 78 (2012). when we described Sputnik (which means 4. Raoult, D. & Forterre, P. Redefining viruses: lessons from Mimivirus. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 6, 315–319 satellite in Russian) the category of satellite Bacteria Eukarya (2008). viruses included only small particles of 15 5. La Scola, B. et al. The virophage as a unique parasite to 17 nm diameter encapsidating a single- of the giant mimivirus. Nature 455, 100–104 (2008). Archaea 6. Fischer, M. G. & Suttle, C. A. A virophage at the origin stranded RNA molecule of 796 to 1,239 bp of large DNA transposons. Science 332, 231–234 and displaying only one to two ORFs. (2011). REOs 7. Forterre, P. & Prangishvili, D. The great billion-year The AAVs, which are commonly called sat- war between ribosome- and capsid-encoding organisms (cells and viruses) as the major source of ellite viruses in the literature and were cited as evolutionary novelties. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1178, a representative of satellite viruses by Krupovic Figure 1 | The capsid-encoding organisms 65–77 (2009). and Cvirkaite-Krupovic1, were previously (CEOs), includingNature the Reviewstraditional | Microbiology viruses of 8. Yau, S. et al. Virophage control of antarctic algal Bacteria, viruses of Archaea and viruses host–virus dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, not included in the satellite virus category 6163–6168 (2011). of Eukarya plus the new ‘viruses of Viruses’ 9. Sun, S. et al. Structural studies of the Sputnik of the ICTV but instead were classified with domain.
Recommended publications
  • A New Family of Hybrid Virophages from an Animal Gut Metagenome Natalya Yutin, Vladimir V Kapitonov and Eugene V Koonin*
    Yutin et al. Biology Direct (2015) 10:19 DOI 10.1186/s13062-015-0054-9 DISCOVERY NOTES Open Access A new family of hybrid virophages from an animal gut metagenome Natalya Yutin, Vladimir V Kapitonov and Eugene V Koonin* Abstract Search of metagenomics sequence databases for homologs of virophage capsid proteins resulted in the discovery of a new family of virophages in the sheep rumen metagenome. The genomes of the rumen virophages (RVP) encode a typical virophage major capsid protein, ATPase and protease combined with a Polinton-type, protein primed family B DNA polymerase. The RVP genomes appear to be linear molecules, with terminal inverted repeats. Thus, the RVP seem to represent virophage-Polinton hybrids that are likely capable of formation of infectious virions. Virion proteins of mimiviruses were detected in the same metagenomes as the RVP suggesting that the virophages of the new family parasitize on giant viruses that infect protist inhabitants of the rumen. This article was reviewed by Mart Krupovic and Kenneth Stedman; for complete reviews, see the Reviewers’ Reports section. Findings been isolated as infectious particles and shown to be associ- With the rapid increase of the quantity and quality of ated with different members of the family Mimiviridae available metagenomics sequences, metagenomes have [11-13], and 9 additional virophage genomes have been as- become a rich source for the discovery of novel viruses sembled from aquatic metagenomes [14-16]. The first vir- [1-3]. A prominent case in point is the recent discovery ophage, named Sputnik, was discovered as a parasite of of a novel, abundant and diversified group of viruses that Acanthamoeba castellani mimivirus [11], and reproduction are chimeras of genes from single-stranded DNA and of the related Zamilon virophage is supported by several positive-strand RNA viruses [4-7].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapitre Quatre La Spécificité D'hôtes Des Virophages Sputnik
    AIX-MARSEILLE UNIVERSITE FACULTE DE MEDECINE DE MARSEILLE ECOLE DOCTORALE DES SCIENCES DE LA VIE ET DE LA SANTE THESE DE DOCTORAT Présentée par Morgan GAÏA Né le 24 Octobre 1987 à Aubagne, France Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR de l’UNIVERSITE AIX -MARSEILLE SPECIALITE : Pathologie Humaine, Maladies Infectieuses Les virophages de Mimiviridae The Mimiviridae virophages Présentée et publiquement soutenue devant la FACULTE DE MEDECINE de MARSEILLE le 10 décembre 2013 Membres du jury de la thèse : Pr. Bernard La Scola Directeur de thèse Pr. Jean -Marc Rolain Président du jury Pr. Bruno Pozzetto Rapporteur Dr. Hervé Lecoq Rapporteur Faculté de Médecine, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France URMITE, UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, Inserm 1095 Directeur : Pr. Didier RAOULT Avant-propos Le format de présentation de cette thèse correspond à une recommandation de la spécialité Maladies Infectieuses et Microbiologie, à l’intérieur du Master des Sciences de la Vie et de la Santé qui dépend de l’Ecole Doctorale des Sciences de la Vie de Marseille. Le candidat est amené à respecter des règles qui lui sont imposées et qui comportent un format de thèse utilisé dans le Nord de l’Europe permettant un meilleur rangement que les thèses traditionnelles. Par ailleurs, la partie introduction et bibliographie est remplacée par une revue envoyée dans un journal afin de permettre une évaluation extérieure de la qualité de la revue et de permettre à l’étudiant de commencer le plus tôt possible une bibliographie exhaustive sur le domaine de cette thèse. Par ailleurs, la thèse est présentée sur article publié, accepté ou soumis associé d’un bref commentaire donnant le sens général du travail.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Sections As Applicable
    This form should be used for all taxonomic proposals. Please complete all those modules that are applicable (and then delete the unwanted sections). For guidance, see the notes written in blue and the separate document “Help with completing a taxonomic proposal” Please try to keep related proposals within a single document; you can copy the modules to create more than one genus within a new family, for example. MODULE 1: TITLE, AUTHORS, etc (to be completed by ICTV Code assigned: 2015.001a-kF officers) Short title: A new family and two new genera for classification of virophages two new species (e.g. 6 new species in the genus Zetavirus) Modules attached 1 2 3 4 5 (modules 1 and 10 are required) 6 7 8 9 10 Author(s): Matthias Fischer – Max Planck Institute for Medical Research, Germany Mart Krupovic – Institut Pasteur, France Jens H. Kuhn – NIH/NIAID/IRF-Frederick, Maryland, USA Bernard La Scola – Aix Marseille Université, France Didier Raoult – Aix Marseille Université, France Corresponding author with e-mail address: Matthias Fischer, [email protected] Mart Krupovic, [email protected] List the ICTV study group(s) that have seen this proposal: A list of study groups and contacts is provided at http://www.ictvonline.org/subcommittees.asp . If in doubt, contact the appropriate subcommittee chair (fungal, invertebrate, plant, prokaryote or vertebrate viruses) ICTV Study Group comments (if any) and response of the proposer: Date first submitted to ICTV: June 11, 2015 Date of this revision (if different to above): ICTV-EC comments and response of the proposer: Fungal and Protist Viruses Subcommittee Chair: Proposal approved for submission.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha-Satellite RNA Transcripts Are Repressed by Centromere
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Alpha-satellite RNA transcripts are repressed by centromere–nucleolus associations Leah Bury1†, Brittania Moodie1†, Jimmy Ly1,2, Liliana S McKay1, Karen HH Miga3, Iain M Cheeseman1,2* 1Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, United States; 2Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States; 3UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States Abstract Although originally thought to be silent chromosomal regions, centromeres are instead actively transcribed. However, the behavior and contributions of centromere-derived RNAs have remained unclear. Here, we used single-molecule fluorescence in-situ hybridization (smFISH) to detect alpha-satellite RNA transcripts in intact human cells. We find that alpha-satellite RNA- smFISH foci levels vary across cell lines and over the cell cycle, but do not remain associated with centromeres, displaying localization consistent with other long non-coding RNAs. Alpha-satellite expression occurs through RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription, but does not require established centromere or cell division components. Instead, our work implicates centromere– nucleolar interactions as repressing alpha-satellite expression. The fraction of nucleolar-localized centromeres inversely correlates with alpha-satellite transcripts levels across cell lines and transcript levels increase substantially when the nucleolus is disrupted. The control of alpha-satellite transcripts by centromere-nucleolar contacts provides a mechanism to modulate centromere transcription and chromatin dynamics across diverse cell states and conditions. *For correspondence: [email protected] †These authors contributed equally to this work Introduction Chromosome segregation requires the function of a macromolecular kinetochore structure to con- Competing interests: The nect chromosomal DNA and spindle microtubule polymers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expression of Human Endogenous Retroviruses Is Modulated by the Tat Protein of HIV‐1
    The Expression of Human Endogenous Retroviruses is modulated by the Tat protein of HIV‐1 by Marta Jeannette Gonzalez‐Hernandez A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Immunology) in The University of Michigan 2012 Doctoral Committee Professor David M. Markovitz, Chair Professor Gary Huffnagle Professor Michael J. Imperiale Associate Professor David J. Miller Assistant Professor Akira Ono Assistant Professor Christiane E. Wobus © Marta Jeannette Gonzalez‐Hernandez 2012 For my family and friends, the most fantastic teachers I have ever had. ii Acknowledgements First, and foremost, I would like to thank David Markovitz for his patience and his scientific and mentoring endeavor. My time in the laboratory has been an honor and a pleasure. Special thanks are also due to all the members of the Markovitz laboratory, past and present. It has been a privilege, and a lot of fun, to work near such excellent scientists and friends. You all have a special place in my heart. I would like to thank all the members of my thesis committee for all the valuable advice, help and jokes whenever needed. Our collaborators from the Bioinformatics Core, particularly James Cavalcoli, Fan Meng, Manhong Dai, Maureen Sartor and Gil Omenn gave generous support, technical expertise and scientific insight to a very important part of this project. Thank you. Thanks also go to Mariana Kaplan’s and Akira Ono’s laboratory for help with experimental designs and for being especially generous with time and reagents. iii Table of Contents Dedication ............................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Replication-Defective Chimeric Helper Proviruses and Factors Affecting Generation of Competent Virus
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, May 1987, p. 1797-1806 Vol. 7, No. 5 0270-7306/87/051797-10$02.00/0 Copyright © 1987, American Society for Microbiology Replication-Defective Chimeric Helper Proviruses and Factors Affecting Generation of Competent Virus: Expression of Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Structural Genes via the Metallothionein Promoter ROBERT A. BOSSELMAN,* ROU-YIN HSU, JOAN BRUSZEWSKI, SYLVIA HU, FRANK MARTIN, AND MARGERY NICOLSON Amgen, Thousand Oaks, California 91320 Received 15 October 1986/Accepted 28 January 1987 Two chimeric helper proviruses were derived from the provirus of the ecotropic Moloney murine leukemia virus by replacing the 5' long terminal repeat and adjacent proviral sequences with the mouse metallothionein I promoter. One of these chimeric proviruses was designed to express the gag-pol genes of the virus, whereas the other was designed to express only the env gene. When transfected into NIH 3T3 cells, these helper proviruses failed to generate competent virus but did express Zn2 -inducible trans-acting viral functions needed to assemble infectious vectors. One helper cell line (clone 32) supported vector assembly at levels comparable to those supported by the Psi-2 and PA317 cell lines transfected with the same vector. Defective proviruses which carry the neomycin phosphotransferase gene and which lack overlapping sequence homology with the 5' end of the chimeric helper proviruses could be transfected into the helper cell line without generation of replication-competent virus. Mass cultures of transfected helper cells produced titers of about 104 G418r CFU/ml, whereas individual clones produced titers between 0 and 2.6 x 104 CFU/ml.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Virophages and Giant Viruses Beata Tokarz-Deptuła1*, Paulina Czupryńska2, Agata Poniewierska-Baran1 and Wiesław Deptuła2
    Vol. 65, No 4/2018 487–496 https://doi.org/10.18388/abp.2018_2631 Review Characteristics of virophages and giant viruses Beata Tokarz-Deptuła1*, Paulina Czupryńska2, Agata Poniewierska-Baran1 and Wiesław Deptuła2 1Department of Immunology, 2Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland Five years after being discovered in 2003, some giant genus, Mimiviridae family (Table 3). It was found in the viruses were demonstrated to play a role of the hosts protozoan A. polyphaga in a water-cooling tower in Brad- for virophages, their parasites, setting out a novel and ford (Table 1). Sputnik has a spherical dsDNA genome yet unknown regulatory mechanism of the giant virus- closed in a capsid with icosahedral symmetry, 50–74 nm es presence in an aqueous. So far, 20 virophages have in size, inside which there is a lipid membrane made of been registered and 13 of them have been described as phosphatidylserine, which probably protects the genetic a metagenomic material, which indirectly impacts the material of the virophage (Claverie et al., 2009; Desnues number of single- and multi-cell organisms, the environ- et al., 2012). Sputnik’s genome has 18343 base pairs with ment where giant viruses replicate. 21 ORFs that encode proteins of 88 to 779 amino ac- ids. They compose the capsids and are responsible for Key words: virophages, giant viruses, MIMIVIRE, Sputnik N-terminal acetylation of amino acids and transposases Received: 14 June, 2018; revised: 21 August, 2018; accepted: (Claverie et al., 2009; Desnues et al., 2012; Tokarz-Dep- 09 September, 2018; available on-line: 23 October, 2018 tula et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements
    GE54CH23_Feschotte ARjats.cls September 12, 2020 7:34 Annual Review of Genetics A Field Guide to Eukaryotic Transposable Elements Jonathan N. Wells and Cédric Feschotte Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850; email: [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Genet. 2020. 54:23.1–23.23 Keywords The Annual Review of Genetics is online at transposons, retrotransposons, transposition mechanisms, transposable genet.annualreviews.org element origins, genome evolution https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-040620- 022145 Abstract Annu. Rev. Genet. 2020.54. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org Access provided by Cornell University on 09/26/20. For personal use only. Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile DNA sequences that propagate All rights reserved within genomes. Through diverse invasion strategies, TEs have come to oc- cupy a substantial fraction of nearly all eukaryotic genomes, and they rep- resent a major source of genetic variation and novelty. Here we review the defining features of each major group of eukaryotic TEs and explore their evolutionary origins and relationships. We discuss how the unique biology of different TEs influences their propagation and distribution within and across genomes. Environmental and genetic factors acting at the level of the host species further modulate the activity, diversification, and fate of TEs, producing the dramatic variation in TE content observed across eukaryotes. We argue that cataloging TE diversity and dissecting the idiosyncratic be- havior of individual elements are crucial to expanding our comprehension of their impact on the biology of genomes and the evolution of species. 23.1 Review in Advance first posted on , September 21, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of Viroids, Viroidlike Satellite Rnas, and the Viroidlike Domain of Hepatitis 6 Virus
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 5631-5634, July 1991 Evolution Phylogeny of viroids, viroidlike satellite RNAs, and the viroidlike domain of hepatitis 6 virus RNA (statistical geometry/quasispecies/RNA world/living fossils) SANTIAGO F. ELENA*, JOAQUIN DoPAZO*, RICARDO FLORESt, THEODOR 0. DIENER*, AND ANDR1S MOYA*§ *Departament de Gendtica i Servei de BioinformAtica, Universitat de Valdncia, Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burassot, Valdncia, Spain; tUnidad de Biologia Molecular y Celular de Plantas, Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologfa de Alimentos, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, 46010 Valdncia, Spain; and fCenter for Agricultural Biotechnology, and Department of Botany, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, and Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD 20705 Contributed by Theodor 0. Diener, March 21, 1991 ABSTRACT We report a phylogenetic study of viroids, assumed an intracellular mode of existence sometime after some plant satellite RNAs, and the viroidlike domain of human the evolution of cellular organisms. hepatitis 8 virus RNA. Our results support a monophyletic Implicit in this proposal is the possibility that all viroids and origin ofthese RNAs and are consistent with the hypothesis that viroidlike RNAs may have been derived from a common they may be "living fossils" of a precellular RNA world. ancestor. To obtain evidence for or against this proposition, Moreover, the viroidlike domain of human hepatitis 8 virus we have conducted a phylogenetic analysis of these small RNA appears closely related to the viroidlike satellite RNAs of pathogenic RNAs and report here that our results are con- plants, with which it shares some structural and functional sistent with a monophyletic origin of viroids and viroidlike properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Viral Envelope Are Controlled by the Helper Virus Used to Activate The
    DETERMINING FACTOR IN THE CAPACITY OF ROUS SARCOMA VIRUS TO INDUCE TUMORS IN MAMMALS* By HIDESABURO HANAFUSA AND TERUKO HANAFUSA COLLMGE DE FRANCE, LABORATOIRE DE MIDECINE EXPARIMENTALE, PARIS Communidated by Ahdre Lwoff, January 24, 1966 Since Zilber and Kriukoval and Svet-Moldavsky' demonstrated that some strains of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) are capable of inducing hemorrhagic cysts or sarcomas in newborn rats, numerous attempts have been made to induce tumors by RSVin various species of mammals.3-9 One of the remarkable aspects revealed by these investigations is the strain differences in RSV for this capacity.6-9 Certain strains, such as the Schmidt-Ruppin strain, are active, while others, such as the Bryan strain, are generally inactive in mammals. The cause of such strain differ- ences has not been elucidated. Our previous studies have shown that the Bryan high-titer strain of RSV is a defective virus which cannot reproduce without the help of any one of the avian leukosis viruses.'0 The defectiveness derives from the inability of this strain of RSV to induce the synthesis of its own viral envelope."I An essential role played by the helper virus is to provide the envelope to the RSV genome, whose replica- tion occurs in the infected cells without the aid of helper virus. Thus, several properties of RSV which presumably depend in some way on the character of the viral envelope are controlled by the helper virus used to activate the RSV.11-13 These properties include the antigenicity, the sensitivity to the interference induced by the helper virus, and the host range among genetically different chick embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiny Giants | Maxplanckresearch 3/2019
    BIOLOGY & MEDICINE_Viruses Tiny giants Viruses are usually incredibly small, but some deviate from the norm and reach sizes greater than that of a bacterial cell. Matthias Fischer from the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research in Heidelberg is one of a small number of scientists working on giant viruses of this kind. TEXT STEFANIE REINBERGER Photo: Wolfram Scheible 58 MaxPlanckResearch 3 | 19 n the laboratory of Matthias Fischer Although they look like nothing more As giant viruses are about at the Max Planck Institute in Hei- than vials of water to the naked eye, the the same size as bacteria, delberg, vials containing water samples are actually teeming with it is almost impossible to purify them by filtration samples are lined up against one life, which only becomes visible when only. However, as viruses another, each containing a whole viewed through a microscope: countless and bacteria have different I world of aquatic single-celled organ- tiny dots are scurrying back and forth. densities, they form layers isms and viruses. The labels reveal the “The smaller ones are bacteria, which when spun in an ultracen- trifuge. Scientists can then origins of the samples: Guenzburg, are devoured by larger cells that have a extract the viral band using Kiel, but also more exotic locations nucleus. These so-called protists are the a syringe and needle. such as Tallinn or the British Virgin reason we created the collection in the Islands. “The collection is the result of first place,” Fischer explains. Indeed, many years of work,” the microbiolo- these protists are susceptible to attack Photo: Wolfram Scheible gist explains.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite RNA-Mediated Resistance to Turnip Crinkle Virus in Arabidopsis Lnvolves a Reduction in Virus Movement
    The Plant Cell, Vol. 9, 2051-2063, November 1997 O 1997 American Society of Plant Physiologists Satellite RNA-Mediated Resistance to Turnip Crinkle Virus in Arabidopsis lnvolves a Reduction in Virus Movement Qingzhong Kong, Jianlong Wang, and Anne E. Simon’ Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts O1 003-4505 Satellite RNAs (sat-RNAs) are parasites of viruses that can mediate resistance to the helper virus. We previously showed that a sat-RNA (sat-RNA C) of turnip crinkle virus (TCV), which normally intensifies symptoms of TCV, is able to attenuate symptoms when TCV contains the coat protein (CP) of cardamine chlorotic fleck virus (TCV-CPccw).We have now determined that sat-RNA C also attenuates symptoms of TCV containing an alteration in the initiating AUG of the CP open reading frame (TCV-CPm). TCV-CPm, which is able to move systemically in both the TCV-susceptible ecotype Columbia (Col-O) and the TCV-resistant ecotype Dijon (Di-O), produced a reduced level of CP and no detectable virions in infected plants. Sat-RNA C reduced the accumulation of TCV-CPm by <25% in protoplasts while reducing the level of TCV-CPm by 90 to 100% in uninoculated leaves of COLO and Di-O. Our results suggest that in the presence of a re- duced level of a possibly altered CP, sat-RNA C reduces virus long-distance movement in a manner that is independent of the salicylic acid-dependent defense pathway. INTRODUCTION Plants exhibit different types of resistance to plant viruses, on virus association for replication and spread in plants.
    [Show full text]