DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Master Document Draft EFH EIS Gulf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Master Document Draft EFH EIS Gulf Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Generic Essential Fish Habitat Amendment to the following fishery management plans of the Gulf of Mexico (GOM): SHRIMP FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO RED DRUM FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO REEF FISH FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO STONE CRAB FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO CORAL AND CORAL REEF FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO SPINY LOBSTER FISHERY OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC COASTAL MIGRATORY PELAGIC RESOURCES OF THE GULF OF MEXICO AND SOUTH ATLANTIC VOLUME 1: TEXT March 2004 Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council The Commons at Rivergate 3018 U.S. Highway 301 North, Suite 1000 Tampa, Florida 33619-2266 Tel: 813-228-2815 (toll-free 888-833-1844), FAX: 813-225-7015 E-mail: [email protected] This is a publication of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council pursuant to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Award No. NA17FC1052. COVER SHEET Environmental Impact Statement for the Generic Essential Fish Habitat Amendment to the fishery management plans of the Gulf of Mexico Draft () Final (X) Type of Action: Administrative (x) Legislative ( ) Area of Potential Impact: Areas of tidally influenced waters and substrates of the Gulf of Mexico and its estuaries in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida extending out to the limit of the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Agency: HQ Contact: Region Contacts: U.S. Department of Commerce Steve Kokkinakis David Dale NOAA Fisheries NOAA-Strategic Planning (N/SP) (727)570-5317 Southeast Region Building SSMC3, Rm. 15532 David Keys 9721 Executive Center Dr. N 1315 East-West Highway (727)570-5301 Suite 201 Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282 St. Petersburg, FL 33702 ABSTRACT This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) analyzes within each fishery a range of potential alternatives to: (1) describe and identify Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) for the fishery, (2) identify other actions to encourage the conservation and enhancement such EFH, and (3) identify measures to minimize to the extent practicable the adverse effects of fishing on such EFH. The EIS contains the scientific methodology and data used in the analyses, background information on the physical, biological, human, and administrative environments, and a description of the fishing and non-fishing threats to EFH. Additional copies of this EIS may be obtained by contacting the Regional Contacts (above) or at the address below. Roy E. Crabtree, Ph.D. Regional Administrator NOAA Fisheries Southeast Region 9721 Executive Center Drive North St. Petersburg, Florida March 2004 Final EIS for EFH for the Gulf of Mexico FMPs Page i ACRONYMS/ABBREVIATIONS ABC acceptable biological catch ADCNR, MRD Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Marine Resources Division AFS American Fisheries Society ALARM Automated Landings Assessment for Responsive Management AP advisory panel ASAP Age Structured Assessment Program ATCA Atlantic Tuna Convention Act BRD bycatch reduction device CAGEAN Catch at age analysis CCA Coastal Conservation Association CFD Coastal Fisheries Division CMC Center for Marine Conservation (now Ocean Conservancy) ComFIN Commercial Fisheries Information Network Council Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council CPUE catch per unit effort CZMA Coastal Zone Management Act DEIS draft environmental impact statement DOC U. S. Department of Commerce DOI Department of Interior EA environmental assessment EEC European Economic Community EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EFH Essential Fish Habitat EIS Environmental Impact Statement E.O. Executive Order EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act F instantaneous fishing mortality rate FACA Federal Advisory Committee Act FCZ fishery conservation zone (is now called EEZ) FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FFWCC Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission FKNMS Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary FL fork length FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FMP fishery management plan FMRI Florida Marine Research Institute FTTS Florida Trip Ticket System GAFF Gulfwide Association of Finfish Fishermen GIS Geographical Information System GLM general linear model March 2004 Final EIS for EFH for the Gulf of Mexico FMPs Page iii GMFMC Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council GOM Gulf of Mexico GSA General Services Administration GSAFF Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Foundation GSMFC Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission HAPC Habitat Areas of Particular Concern HMS Highly Migratory Species HRP Habitat Research Plan HSI Habitat Suitability Index HSM Habitat Suitability Model ICCAT International Commission on Conservation of Atlantic Tunas IFQ Individual Fishing Quotas IVR Inter-active Voice Recognition IRFA initial regulatory flexibility analysis ITQ individual transferable quota KWCBA Key West Charterboatmen’s Association LDWF Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries LOA length overall LEAP Law Enforcement Advisory Panel M instantaneous natural mortality rate MAFAC Marine Fisheries Advisory Committee MAFMC Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council MARFIN Marine Fisheries Initiative MCCF Monroe County Commercial Fishermen, Incorporated MDMR Mississippi Department of Marine Resources MFMT Maximum Fishing Mortality Threshold MMA Marine Managed Area MMS Minerals Management Service MP million pounds MPA Marine Protected Area MRFSS Marine Recreational Fishery Statistics Survey M-S Act Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson- Stevens Act) MSAP Mackerel Stock Assessment Panel MSST Minimum Stock Size Threshold MSY maximum sustainable yield MYPR maximum yield per recruit NESDIS National Environmental, Satellite, Data and Information Service NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NGDC National Geophysical Data Center NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NODC National Oceanographic Data Center NOS National Ocean Service NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System OC Ocean Conservancy (formerly CMC) Page iv Final EIS for EFH for the Gulf of Mexico FMPs March 2004 OFF Organized Fishermen of Florida OMB Office of Management and Budget OY optimum yield PDF Portable Document Format ppt parts per thousand (salinity) RA Regional Administrator of NMFS RecFIN Recreational Fisheries Information Network RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act RIR regulatory impact review RSW running sea water system SAFMC South Atlantic Fishery Management Council SAP stock assessment panel SASI Save America’s Seafood Industry SAV Submerged Aquatic Vegetation SBA Small Business Administration SCRS Standing Committee on Research and Statistics SEAMAP Southeast Area Monitoring and Assessment Program SFA Southeastern Fisheries Association SEFSC Southeast Fisheries Science Center of NMFS SEIS supplemental environmental impact statement SEP Socioeconomic Panel SERO Southeast Regional Office (NMFS) SFA Sustainable Fisheries Act SMZ special management zone SOFA Southern Offshore Fishermen’s Association SOPPs Statement of Organization Practices and Procedures SPL saltwater products license (FL) SPR spawning potential ratio SSB/R spawning stock biomass per recruit SSC Scientific and Statistical Committee TAC total allowable catch TED turtle excluder device TIP trip interview program TL total length TNRIS Texas Natural Resources Information Network TPWD Texas Parks and Wildlife Division TSA Texas Shrimp Association USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey VMS Vessel Monitoring System VPA virtual population analysis WDC/MGG World Data Center/Marine Geology and Geophysics YPR yield per recruit Z instantaneous total mortality rate March 2004 Final EIS for EFH for the Gulf of Mexico FMPs Page v GLOSSARY ALGAE - A collective, or general name, applied to a number of primarily aquatic, photosynthetic groups (taxa) of plants and plant_like protists. They range in size from single cells to large, multicellular forms like the giant kelps. They are the foodbase for almost all marine animals. Important taxa are the dinoflagellates (division Pyrrophyta), diatoms (div., Chrysophyta), green algae (div. Chlorophyta), brown algae (div. Phaeophyta), and red algae (div. Rhodophyta). Cyanobacteria are often called blue-green algae, although blue-green bacteria is a preferable term. ANTHROPOGENIC - Refers to the effects of human activities. BATHYMETRIC-A depth measurement. Also refers to a migration from waters of one depth to another. BENTHIC-Pertaining to the bottom of an ocean, lake, or river. Also refers to sessile and crawling animals which reside in or on the bottom. BIOGENIC-Features built by or consisting of liviving organisms. BIOMASS-The total mass of living tissues (wet or dried) of an organism or collection or organisms of a species or trophic level, from a defined area or volume. CALCAREOUS-Composed of calcium or calcium carbonate. CONTINENTAL SHELF-The submerged continental land mass, not usually deeper than 200 m. The shelf may extend from a few miles off the coastline to several hundred miles. CONTINENTAL SLOPE-The steeply sloping seabed that connects the continental shelf and continental rise. CORAL REEF-Coral communities exist under a variety of water depths, bottom types, water quality, wave energy and currents. Well-developed active coral reefs usually occur in tropical and subtropical waters of low turbidity, low terrestrial runoff, and low levels of suspended sediment. Some of the best developed reefs in Puerto Rico are those which receive the lowest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shrimp Fishing in Mexico
    235 Shrimp fishing in Mexico Based on the work of D. Aguilar and J. Grande-Vidal AN OVERVIEW Mexico has coastlines of 8 475 km along the Pacific and 3 294 km along the Atlantic Oceans. Shrimp fishing in Mexico takes place in the Pacific, Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean, both by artisanal and industrial fleets. A large number of small fishing vessels use many types of gear to catch shrimp. The larger offshore shrimp vessels, numbering about 2 212, trawl using either two nets (Pacific side) or four nets (Atlantic). In 2003, shrimp production in Mexico of 123 905 tonnes came from three sources: 21.26 percent from artisanal fisheries, 28.41 percent from industrial fisheries and 50.33 percent from aquaculture activities. Shrimp is the most important fishery commodity produced in Mexico in terms of value, exports and employment. Catches of Mexican Pacific shrimp appear to have reached their maximum. There is general recognition that overcapacity is a problem in the various shrimp fleets. DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURE Although trawling for shrimp started in the late 1920s, shrimp has been captured in inshore areas since pre-Columbian times. Magallón-Barajas (1987) describes the lagoon shrimp fishery, developed in the pre-Hispanic era by natives of the southeastern Gulf of California, which used barriers built with mangrove sticks across the channels and mouths of estuaries and lagoons. The National Fisheries Institute (INP, 2000) and Magallón-Barajas (1987) reviewed the history of shrimp fishing on the Pacific coast of Mexico. It began in 1921 at Guaymas with two United States boats.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Stewardship Council Pre-Assessment
    10051 5th Street N., Suite 105 St. Petersburg, Florida 33702-2211 Tel: (727) 563-9070 Fax: (727) 563-0207 Em ail: MRAG.Americas@m ragam ericas.com President: Andrew A. Rosenberg, Ph.D. Pre-Assessment of the Louisiana Shrimp Fishery Prepared for Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Prepared by MRAG Americas, Inc. Robert J. Trumble January 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Aims/scope of pre-assessment ............................................................................ 2 1.2 Constraints to the pre-assessment of the fishery ................................................. 3 1.3. Unit(s) of Assessment ......................................................................................... 3 1.4 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ...................................................... 3 2. Description of the fishery ................................................................................................ 4 2.1. Scope of the fishery in relation to the MSC programme ....................................... 4 2.2. Overview of the fishery ........................................................................................ 4 2.3. Principle One: Target species background .......................................................... 4 2.4. Principle Two: Ecosystem background ................................................................ 5 2.5. Principle Three: Management system background
    [Show full text]
  • Flounder, Sea Trout and Redfish the Panhandle Inshore Slam
    Flounder, Sea Trout and Redfish The Panhandle Inshore Slam Presented by Ron Barwick Service Manager, Half Hitch (850) 234-2621 Hosted by Bob Fowler (850) 708-1317 Marinemax.com halfhitch.com 1 FLOUNDER IDENTIFICATION Gulf Flounder – Paralichthys albigutta Note three spots forming a triangle Southern Flounder – Paralichthys lethostigma Note absence of spots Summer Flounder – Paralichthys dentatus Note five spots on the body near the tail SIZE & BAG LIMITS 12 inch minimum overall length size limit all species 10 bag limit per person per day all species combined Southern flounder move out to the Gulf to spawn in September through November while Gulf flounder move into the Bay to spawn 6 types of flounder live in our bay 2 Rod Selection Fast and Extra Fast action rods are best for jig fishing Medium or moderate action rods are preferred when using bait Longer rods will increase casting distance while shorter rods provide more leverage and control Be careful not to confuse Action and Power Look at Line ratings and Lure Weight 3 SPINNING vs. CASTING Easiest to cast Poor leverage Better leverage Limited drag Best drag More difficult to cast Greater line control 4 Braid or Mono fishing line Braid Mono •Zero Stretch •Reasonable priced •Small Diameter •Able to stretch •No memory •Multiple colors •Can not color, coat •Has memory only not able to die •Pricey •Very durable 5 Fluorocarbon Leader • Great Leader – High abrasion resistance – Stiffer – Larger Diameter – Same density as saltwater – Carbon fleck stops light transmittal – Has UV inhibitors
    [Show full text]
  • NMFS 2010 Essential Fish Habitat, TN186
    Essential Fish Habitat: A Marine Fish Habitat Conservation Mandate For Federal Agencies Gulf of Mexico Region National Marine Fisheries Service Habitat Conservation Division Southeast Regional Office 263 13th Avenue S. St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727/824-5317 REV. 09/2010 1 Executive Summary The 1996 amendments to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) set forth a new mandate for NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), regional fishery management councils (FMC), and other federal agencies to identify and protect important marine and anadromous fish habitat. The essential fish habitat (EFH) provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act support one of the nation’s overall marine resource management goals - maintaining sustainable fisheries. Essential to achieving this goal is the maintenance of suitable marine fishery habitat quality and quantity. The FMCs, with assistance from NMFS, have delineated EFH for federally managed species. As new fishery management plans (FMPs) are developed, EFH for newly managed species will be defined as well. Federal action agencies which fund, permit, or carry out activities that may adversely affect EFH are required to consult with NMFS regarding the potential impacts of their actions on EFH and respond in writing to NMFS or FMC recommendations. In addition, NMFS and the FMCs may comment on and make recommendations to any state agency on their activities that may affect EFH. Measures recommended by NMFS or an FMC to protect EFH are advisory, not proscriptive. On December 19, 1997, interim final rules, which specified procedures for implementation of the EFH provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, were published in the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Balanus Trigonus
    Nauplius ORIGINAL ARTICLE THE JOURNAL OF THE Settlement of the barnacle Balanus trigonus BRAZILIAN CRUSTACEAN SOCIETY Darwin, 1854, on Panulirus gracilis Streets, 1871, in western Mexico e-ISSN 2358-2936 www.scielo.br/nau 1 orcid.org/0000-0001-9187-6080 www.crustacea.org.br Michel E. Hendrickx Evlin Ramírez-Félix2 orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-5283 1 Unidad académica Mazatlán, Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. A.P. 811, Mazatlán, Sinaloa, 82000, Mexico 2 Oficina de INAPESCA Mazatlán, Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. Sábalo- Cerritos s/n., Col. Estero El Yugo, Mazatlán, 82112, Sinaloa, Mexico. ZOOBANK http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:74B93F4F-0E5E-4D69- A7F5-5F423DA3762E ABSTRACT A large number of specimens (2765) of the acorn barnacle Balanus trigonus Darwin, 1854, were observed on the spiny lobster Panulirus gracilis Streets, 1871, in western Mexico, including recently settled cypris (1019 individuals or 37%) and encrusted specimens (1746) of different sizes: <1.99 mm, 88%; 1.99 to 2.82 mm, 8%; >2.82 mm, 4%). Cypris settled predominantly on the carapace (67%), mostly on the gastric area (40%), on the left or right orbital areas (35%), on the head appendages, and on the pereiopods 1–3. Encrusting individuals were mostly small (84%); medium-sized specimens accounted for 11% and large for 5%. On the cephalothorax, most were observed in branchial (661) and orbital areas (240). Only 40–41 individuals were found on gastric and cardiac areas. Some individuals (246), mostly small (95%), were observed on the dorsal portion of somites.
    [Show full text]
  • Presence of Pacific White Shrimp Litopenaeus Vannamei (Boone, 1931) in the Southern Gulf of Mexico
    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Supplement 1: S139–S142 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.S1.031 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Aquatic Invasions Records Presence of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in the Southern Gulf of Mexico Armando T. Wakida-Kusunoki1*, Luis Enrique Amador-del Angel2, Patricia Carrillo Alejandro1 and Cecilia Quiroga Brahms1 1Instituto Nacional de Pesca, Ave. Héroes del 21 de Abril s/n. Col Playa Norte, Ciudad del Carmen Campeche, México 2Universidad Autónoma del Carmen, Centro de Investigación de Ciencias Ambientales (CICA), Ave. Laguna de Términos s/n Col. Renovación 2da Sección, C.P. 24155, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México E-mail: [email protected] (ATWK), [email protected] (LEAA), [email protected] (PCA), [email protected] (CQB) *Corresponding author Received: 12 July 2011 / Accepted: 12 October 2011 / Published online: 27 October 2011 Abstract This is the first report of the presence of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in the Southern Gulf of Mexico coast. Seven specimens were collected in the Carmen-Pajonal-Machona lagoons near La Azucena and Sanchez Magallanes in Tabasco, Mexico, during a shrimp monitoring program survey conducted in this area. Further sampling and monitoring are required to find evidence that confirms the establishment of a population of Pacific white shrimp L. vannamei in Southern Gulf of Mexico. Key words: Litopenaeus vannamei, Pacific white shrimp, invasive species, Tabasco, Mexico Introduction covering 319.6 ha (Diario Oficial de la Federacion 2011). Almost all of these farms are Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) is native to located in the Southern part of the Machona the Eastern Pacific coast from the Gulf of Lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • First Records of the Fish Abudefduf Sexfasciatus (Lacepède, 1801) and Acanthurus Sohal (Forsskål, 1775) in the Mediterranean Sea
    BioInvasions Records (2018) Volume 7, Issue 2: 205–210 Open Access DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2018.7.2.14 © 2018 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2018 REABIC Rapid Communication First records of the fish Abudefduf sexfasciatus (Lacepède, 1801) and Acanthurus sohal (Forsskål, 1775) in the Mediterranean Sea Ioannis Giovos1,*, Giacomo Bernardi2, Georgios Romanidis-Kyriakidis1, Dimitra Marmara1 and Periklis Kleitou1,3 1iSea, Environmental Organization for the Preservation of the Aquatic Ecosystems, Thessaloniki, Greece 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, USA 3Marine and Environmental Research (MER) Lab Ltd., Limassol, Cyprus *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 26 October 2017 / Accepted: 16 January 2018 / Published online: 14 March 2018 Handling editor: Ernesto Azzurro Abstract To date, the Mediterranean Sea has been subjected to numerous non-indigenous species’ introductions raising the attention of scientists, managers, and media. Several introduction pathways contribute to these introduction, including Lessepsian migration via the Suez Canal, accounting for approximately 100 fish species, and intentional or non-intentional aquarium releases, accounting for at least 18 species introductions. In the context of the citizen science project of iSea “Is it alien to you?… Share it”, several citizens are engaged and regularly report observations of alien, rare or unknown marine species. The project aims to monitor the establishment and expansion of alien species in Greece. In this study, we present the first records of two popular high-valued aquarium species, the scissortail sergeant, Abudefduf sexfasciatus and the sohal surgeonfish, Acanthurus sohal, in along the Mediterranean coastline of Greece. The aggressive behaviour of the two species when in captivity, and the absence of records from areas close to the Suez Canal suggest that both observations are the result of aquarium intentional releases, rather than a Lessepsian migration.
    [Show full text]
  • Copper Shoals Red Drum Sciaenops Ocellatus
    Copper Shoals Red Drum Sciaenops ocellatus Description: Copper Shoals Red Drum®is a marine red drum farm- NUTRITIONAL INFORMATION raised in Texas. The marine red drum is commonly Per 3oz portion known as redfish or spottail sea bass. It is a game fish native to the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico Calories 110 Total Fat 9 g and is found in coastal waters from Massachusetts to Saturated Fat 3 g Tuxpan, Mexico. Red drum travel in shoals (schools) Protein 17.5 g and are aggressive eaters, feeding on shrimp and small Sodium 70 mg Omega-3 0.8 g fish such as menhaden and mullet, at times in waters so shallow that their backs are exposed. Red drum is more copper than red. It’s most distictive feature is one or more large black spots on the tail. The spot tricks predators into targeting the tail of the fish rather than COOKING METHODS the head, allowing the red drum the chance to get away. Blacken Sauté Eating Qualities: Grill The light, white meat of Copper Shoals Red Steam Drum® tastes mild, not bland. It has a robust Bake texture that adapts well to many cooking methods. Sear Farming Methods: Copper Shoals Red Drum® are bred and hatched on two HANDLING family owned and operated inland farms in Texas. The Whole fish should be packed in flaked fingerlings mature in ponds filled with salwater sourced ice. Whole fish and fillets should be from a Matagorda Bay system and saline aquifers. The red stored in a drain pan in the coldest part drum are fed a high-quality, high-protein diet composed of the walk-in.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Croaker Micropogonias Undulatus Contributor: J
    Atlantic Croaker Micropogonias undulatus Contributor: J. David Whitaker DESCRIPTION Taxonomy and Basic Description The Atlantic croaker is the only representative of the genus in the western North Atlantic. This species gets its name from the deep By Diane Rome Peebles from the Florida Division of Marine Resources Web Site. croaking sounds created by muscular action on the air bladder. It is one of 23 members of the family Sciaenidae found along the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico coasts (Mercer 1987). The species has a typical fusiform shape, although it is somewhat vertically compressed. The fish is silvery overall with a faint pinkish-bronze cast. The back and upper sides are grayish, with brassy or brown spots forming wavy lines on the side (Manooch 1988). The gill cover has three to five prominent spines and there are three to five small chin barbels. It has a slightly convex caudal fin. Atlantic croaker south of Cape Hatteras reach maturity after one year at lengths of 140 to 180 mm (5.5 to 7 inches) and are thought to not survive longer than one or two years (Diaz and Onuf 1985). North of Cape Hatteras, the fish matures a year later at lengths greater than 200 mm (8 inches) and individuals may live several years. The Atlantic croaker reaches a maximum length of 500 mm (20 inches) (Hildebrand and Schroeder 1927). Catches of large Atlantic croaker appear to be relatively common on Chesapeake Bay, but large individuals of Atlantic croaker are rare in South Carolina. Bearden (1964) speculated that small croaker from South Carolina may migrate north, but limited tagging studies could not corroborate that assertion.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Effects of Freshwater Inflows and Other Key Drivers
    AsSEssING THE EFFECTS OF FRESHWATER INFLOWS AND OTHER KEY DRIVERS ON THE POPULATION DYNAMICS OF BLUE CRAB AND WHITE SHRIMP USING A MuLTIvARIATE TIME- SERIES MODELING fRAMEwoRK Principal Investigator Dr. Edward J. Buskey Research Coordinator, Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve Professor, Department of Marine Science, The University of Texas at Austin Co-Principal Investigators Dr. Lindsay P. Scheef Research Associate, Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve Dr. Jianhong Xue Research Associate, Mission-Aransas National Estuarine Research Reserve PURSUANT To SENATE BILL 1 AS APPROVED BY THE 83RD TEXAS LEGISLATURE, THIS STUDYREPORT WAS FUNDED FOR THE PURPOSE OF STUDYING ENVIRONMENTAL FLO WNEEDS FOR TEXASRIVERS AND ESTUARIESASPARTOF THEADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PHASE OF THE SENATE BILL 3 PROCESS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS ESTABLISHED BY THE 80TH TEXAS LEGISLA TURE. THE VIEWS AND CONCLUSIONS EXPRESSED HEREIN ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREFLECT THE VIEWS Of THE TEXAS WA TER DEVELOPMENT BOARD. final Report Sponsor Research Project ID: 1400011712 Sponsored by Texas Water Development Board September 2015 Department of Marine Science The University of Texas at Austin Port Aransas, Texas 78373 I ii ABSTRACT Natural freshwater inflow (FWI) from rivers, streams, and rainfall maintains nutrients, sediments, and salinity regimes within estuaries. These factors, together, produce a healthy and sustainable estuary for juvenile and adult finfish and invertebrates that utilize an estuary for foraging, refuge, and reproduction. Other key drivers, such as droughts and human contributed impacts have negative effects on estuaries. Reduced FWI can affect the population dynamics of commercially and ecologically important species such as blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, and white shrimp, Litopenaeus setiferus.
    [Show full text]
  • Voestalpine Essential Fish Habitat Assessment for PSD Greenhouse Gas Permit
    Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site voestalpine Stahl GmbH San Patricio County, Texas January 31, 2013 www.erm.com voestalpine Stahl GmbH Essential Fish Habitat Assessment: Texas Project Site January 31, 2013 Project No. 0172451 San Patricio County, Texas Alicia Smith Partner-in-Charge Graham Donaldson Project Manager Travis Wycoff Project Consultant Environmental Resources Management 15810 Park Ten Place, Suite 300 Houston, Texas 77084-5140 T: 281-600-1000 F: 281-600-1001 Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-2393 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS IV EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 PROPOSED ACTION 1 1.2 AGENCY REGULATIONS 1 1.2.1 Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 1 1.2.1 Essential Fish Habitat Defined 2 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4 2.1 PROJECT SCHEDULE 4 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION 4 2.3 SITE DESCRIPTION 5 2.4 SITE HISTORY 7 2.5 EMISSIONS CONTROLS 8 2.6 NOISE 9 2.7 DUST 10 2.8 WATER AND WASTEWATER 10 2.8.1 Water Sourcing and Water Rights 11 2.8.2 Wastewater Discharge 13 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF THE ACTION AREA 15 3.1 ACTION AREA DEFINED 15 3.2 ACTION AREA DELINEATION METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS 16 3.2.1 Significant Impact Level Dispersion Modeling 16 3.2.2 Other Contaminants 17 4.0 ESSENTIAL FISH HABITAT IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROJECT 19 4.1 SPECIES OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 19 4.1.1 Brown Shrimp 19 4.1.2 Gray Snapper 20 4.1.3 Pink Shrimp 20 4.1.4 Red Drum 20 4.1.5 Spanish Mackerel 21 4.1.6 White Shrimp 21 4.2 HABITAT AREAS OF PARTICULAR CONCERN 22 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE CONDITIONS AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS
    [Show full text]
  • MBNMS Collaborative Groundfish Essential Fish Habitat (EFH
    July 31, 2013 Collaborative Groundfish Essential Fish Habitat Proposal: Protecting Groundfish Essential Fish Habitat While Balancing Fishing Opportunities in Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary, South of Año Nuevo Rosy rockfish (Sebastes rosaceus) Phylum Porifera and Class Crinoidea Contact: Karen Grimmer Resource Protection Coordinator Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary 99 Pacific Avenue, Suite 455a Monterey, CA 93940 MBNMS Groundfish EFH Proposal TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................................................................... 7 List of Tables .......................................................................................................................................... 8 I. Proposal ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3a. Proposal Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 14 3c. Overview of New Information .................................................................................................. 18 4. Proposed Actions ........................................................................................................................... 18 4a. Spatial Changes ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]