DOCSLIB.ORG

DISCUSSION PAPER Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies the French Revolution and German Industr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DISCUSSION PAPER Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies the French Revolution and German Industr DISCUSSION PAPER Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies The French Revolution and German Industrialization: The New Institutional Economics Rewrites History Michael Kopsidis, Daniel W. Bromley DISCUSSION PAPER NO. 149 2014 Theodor-Lieser-Straße 2, 06120 Halle (Saale), Germany Phone: +49-345-2928-110 Fax: +49-345-2928-199 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iamo.de Corresponding author: Michael Kopsidis is senior researcher at IAMO and a professor at Martin Luther University in Halle (Saale), Germany, [email protected]. Daniel W. Bromley is Anderson-Bascom Professor of Applied Economics (Emeritus) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, U.S.A., [email protected]. Bromley is grateful to the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, and the Reimar Lüst Prize, for financial support. Address: Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO) Theodor-Lieser-Strasse 2 06120 Halle (Saale) Germany Phone: ++49-345-2928-230 Fax: ++49-345-2928-299 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.iamo.de Discussion Papers are interim reports on work of the Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies and have received only limited reviews. Views or opinions expressed in them do not necessarily represent those of IAMO. Comments are welcome and should be addressed directly to the author(s). The series Discussion Papers is edited by: Prof. Dr. Alfons Balmann (IAMO) Dr. Stephan Brosig (IAMO) Prof. Dr. Thomas Glauben (IAMO) Dr. Daniel Müller (IAMO) Prof. Dr. Heinrich Hockmann (IAMO) Prof. Dr. Martin Petrick (IAMO) ISSN 1438-2172 The French Revolution and German Industrialization 3 ABSTRACT Our purpose here is to challenge the "big-bang" approach to economic history in which some alleged institutional imposition – a deus machine – is claimed to launch a series of new economic behaviors. This so-called prime mover is then carried forward by the inexorable forces of path dependency to change the course of history. The specific creation story under investigation here is the French Revolution and the subsequent Napoleonic conquest of parts of Germany. We show that recent efforts to re-write German economic history using this theoretical model cannot be supported by the abundant and concerted empirical evidence. JEL: N43, N53, N63, O43 Keywords: Institutional Change, French Revolution, Germany, Prussian Reforms, Agricultural Development, Industrialization. The French Revolution and German Industrialization 5 Πόλεμος πάντων μὲν πατήρ ἐστι, πάντων δὲ βασιλεύς, καὶ τοὺς μὲν θεοὺς ἔδειξε τοὺς δὲ ἀνθρώπους, τοὺς μὲν δούλους ἐποίησε τοὺς δὲ ἐλευθέρους. (War is the father of all things, king of all things. War makes some people like gods and others he reduces to be human beings, some became slaves and others became free people.) [Heraclitus, c. 535 – c. 475 BCE]. I. INTRODUCTION "X changed the course of history" The emergence of the idea of path dependence seems to have reduced the study of economic history to a search for the definitive cause of a subsequent efflorescence of the settings and circumstances that now define for us what is considered to be our reality. Few scholars seem comfortable without some causal structure that will explain historical trajectories. Thus, much recent work seems concerned to identify a single momentous event that, with creative econometric accoutrements, will allow the authors to pin down the essential prime mover. Surely there is an event in the past that set in train a series of chained responses that, in the fullness of time, brought about the salient features of the present. The Industrial Revolution can be explained by X, the French Revolution can be explained by Y, and the anti-apartheid turn in South Africa can be explained by Z. Once that uncaused cause has been identified, everything else is mechanical – it was inevitable. It helps if that prime mover can be seen as radical rather than continuous. After all, the slow accretion of a number of small institutional refinements cannot be considered "causal." It also helps if the prime mover is exogenous – an invasion, a pestilential plague that changes the relative value of labor versus land, a religious conversion that redefines the Weltan- schauung of a powerful leader. Prime movers gain credibility by being large and external. Prime movers alter the course of history. Early growth theory adhered to this view of technology. Some new technical innovation would appear and lift a languid economy to some new level of productivity and overall efficiency. Then stasis would reign until another new innovation would lift the economy on to a new trajectory. It was reminiscent of Malthusian "agricultural starts" in which new technical innovation, or some new tool, would suddenly allow for modest increases in food production. Malthus would simply revise his ratios and then push the predicted crisis a bit further off into the future. This simple view of technical change was gradually replaced by endogenous growth theory in which technological "starts" were understood to be embedded in existing technology. Growth became less jumpy and more continuous. When economists decided that institutions were important to an understanding of economic growth, the temptation to re-capitulate the theory of technical change was irresistible. Aren’t institutions merely the social technology of an economy? And so we now see research suggesting that institutions enter an economy – just as with a new technique – as some external contrivance that will shift economic processes on to a more promising growth trajectory. This vision, attributable to the so-called "new" institutional economics, is at serious odds with the classical institutionalism of Richard T. Ely, Thorstein Veblen, and John R. Commons. Alexander Field has summarized the issues well: … one can group economists into three categories according to the methodological position they have taken regarding institutional structures. The first, associated with the names of John R. Commons, 6 Michael Kopsidis, Daniel W. Bromley Richard T. Ely, and most of the founders of the American Economic Association, was that institutions had to be understood on a case-by-case basis, in detail: Historical understanding or immersion in the current laws and customs organizing the process under investigation was essential if meaningful analyses or policy recommendations were to be developed. The second methodological position, associated with the development of the neoclassical synthesis, especially after World War II, essentially granted the institutionalists (advocates of position 1) their point and then read them out of the profession by interpreting the analysis of institutions as beyond the scope of economic inquiry. This was reflected in the eventual classification by many libraries of books by Commons and others under the subject heading of sociology, as opposed to economics. The third position, which has attracted an increasing number of devotees, especially in the last decade, attempts to bridge the gap between the former two by accepting the argument that economists have a responsibility to investigate not only the consequences but also the origins or causes of institutional variation. But advocates of this third position (and here they differ from the pioneers of institutional economics) maintain that variation and change in institutional structures can be explained using the same type of economic models whereby price and quantity vectors are explained. Thus, whereas positions 1 and 2 conflict with regard to the appropriate scope of economic inquiry, positions 1 and 3 are in agreement. But the latter positions differ on the appropriate methodology of institutional analysis and, more basically, on the issue of whether a general theory of institutions is possible [FIELD, 1979, p. 50]. The new institutional economics wishes to make institutions causal in the same way that neo-classical growth theory rendered technology causal. Institutional change enters and nudges an economy on to a superior growth trajectory. The topic under discussion here is the French Revolution and the subsequent imposition of a "French treatment" – an institutional imposition – on parts of Germany. This institutional imposition is alleged to have changed the course of German history. II. FRANCE IN GERMANY The literature is in general agreement that French military victories early in the 19th century introduced a number of changes in parts of what would, in 1871, become a unified Germany. Despite this agreement, the evidence remains unclear whether these imposed institutional changes turned out to be decisive over the long run in creating fundamental economic transformations. Put another way: were these imposed institutional reforms of such a nature that they alone could have produced new behaviors? Sheilagh Ogilvie reminds us that much work along these lines remains seriously under-theorized [OGILVIE, 2007]. Emblematic of OGILVIE’S concern, recent research by ACEMOGLU et al. [2011] (hereinafter ACJR) seeks to document, using a variety of econometric tests, a so-called "treatment effect" of the French Revolution in Germany. The purpose of the ACJR paper is to affirm the usefulness of empirical work on institutions as key explanatory instruments of economic performance. While the authors exercise commendable caution throughout their work, ACJR are quite sure that they have isolated the principal avenues through which imposed institutions can do good work. According to the authors, their purpose is to:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 by CLAUDIA MAREIKE
    ROMANTICISM, ORIENTALISM, AND NATIONAL IDENTITY: GERMAN LITERARY FAIRY TALES, 1795-1848 By CLAUDIA MAREIKE KATRIN SCHWABE A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Claudia Mareike Katrin Schwabe 2 To my beloved parents Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisory committee chair, Dr. Barbara Mennel, who supported this project with great encouragement, enthusiasm, guidance, solidarity, and outstanding academic scholarship. I am particularly grateful for her dedication and tireless efforts in editing my chapters during the various phases of this dissertation. I could not have asked for a better, more genuine mentor. I also want to express my gratitude to the other committee members, Dr. Will Hasty, Dr. Franz Futterknecht, and Dr. John Cech, for their thoughtful comments and suggestions, invaluable feedback, and for offering me new perspectives. Furthermore, I would like to acknowledge the abundant support and inspiration of my friends and colleagues Anna Rutz, Tim Fangmeyer, and Dr. Keith Bullivant. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my family, particularly my parents, Dr. Roman and Cornelia Schwabe, as well as to my brother Marius and his wife Marina Schwabe. Many thanks also to my dear friends for all their love and their emotional support throughout the years: Silke Noll, Alice Mantey, Lea Hüllen, and Tina Dolge. In addition, Paul and Deborah Watford deserve special mentioning who so graciously and welcomingly invited me into their home and family. Final thanks go to Stephen Geist and his parents who believed in me from the very start.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany As a “Melting Pot”? Conceptions of Otherness Over Time
    Germany as a “Melting Pot”? Conceptions of Otherness Over Time By Emma Gutman Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology Senior Honors Thesis Brandeis University May 2018 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Abstract 4 Chapter 1: Introduction 5 Chapter 2: Otherness Throughout German History 20 Chapter 3: Being German and (Legally) Becoming German 36 Chapter 4: Getting to Know You: German Attitudes Towards and Experience With Minority Groups 56 Chapter 5: Schaffen Wir Das?: Global Governance in the Refugee Crisis and National, Local, or Individual Responsibility for Integration 80 Chapter 6: Jews and Muslims: Applying the Lessons of the Past to the Present through Holocaust Education 98 Chapter 7: Conclusion 113 Works Cited 120 2 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor, Professor Sarah Lamb, for her enthusiastic support and guidance from the moment I approached her about this topic, way over a year ago and shortly before I was about to leave for abroad. Professor Lamb was invaluable in helping me figure out all the necessary paperwork and procedures for conducting interviews, even when we could not meet in person. When I returned and began working on the paper itself, she was a source of validation for my writing skills and of constructive criticism that pushed me to think more critically and theoretically about the subject matter than ever before, only strengthening the final product. I would also like to thank the entire Anthropology Department at Brandeis University for introducing me, originally just a History major, to this wonderful discipline. I have had some of the most eye-opening educational moments of my undergraduate career during Anthropology class discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • "Germany Above All"
    STUDIES AND DOCUMENTS ON THE WAR "Germany above all" The German mental attitude and the war by Ê. DURKHEIM Professor at the University of Paris Der Staat ist Macht TREITSCHKE (Politik) Translated by J, S. Cette brochure est en vente à la LIBRAIRIE ARMAND COLIN 103, BouUvard Saint-Michel, PARIS, 5' au prix de 0 fr. 50 STUDIES AND DOCUMENTS ON THE WAR PUBLISHING COMMITTEE MM. ERNEST LÀVISSE, of the « Académie française », President. CHARLES ANDLER, professor of German literature and , language in the University of Paris. JOSEPH BÉDIER, professor at the « Collège de France ». HENRI BERGSON, of the « Académie française », EMILE BOUTROUX, of the «Académie française 4. ERNESTTDENIS, professor of history in the University of Paris. - EMILE DURKHEIM, professor in the University of Paris. JACQUES HADAMARD, of the « Académie des Sciences ». GUSTAVE LANSON, professor of French literature in the University of Paris. CHARLES SEIGNOBOS, professor of history in the Uni­ versity of Paris. ANDRÉ WEISS, of the « Académie des Sciences morales, et politiques ». All communications to be addressed to the Secretaey of the Committee : < M. EMILE DURKHEIM, 4, Avenue d'Orléans, PARIS, 14°. STUDIES AND DOCUMENTS ON THE WAR "Germany above all" German mentality and zoat by É. DURKHEIM Professor in the University of Paris. Der Staat ist Macht. TREITSCHKE (Politik). Translated by J. S LIBRAIRIE ARMAND COLIN 103, Boulevard Saint-Michel, PARIS, 5» I9l5 CONTENTS Introduction. The Conduct of Germany during the war springs from a certain mental attiLude , 5 This attitude will be examined in the writings of Treitschke... 4 I. — The State above international law. International treaties do not bind the State.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Überschrift 1
    Tzu-hsin Tu Die Deutsche Ostsiedlung als Ideologie bis zum Ende des Ersten Weltkriegs kassel university press Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde vom Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Universität Kassel als Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Philosophie (Dr. phil.) angenommen. Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Jens Flemming Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Dietmar Hüser Tag der mündlichen Prüfung 9. Juli 2009 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar Zugl.: Kassel, Univ., Diss. 2009 ISBN print: 978-3-89958-802-6 ISBN online: 978-3-89958-803-3 URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0002-8034 © 2009, kassel university press GmbH, Kassel www.upress.uni-kassel.de Printed in Germany Vorwort Die vorliegende Untersuchung ist eine überarbeitete Fassung meiner Disseration, die am 9. Juli 2009 vom Institut für die neuere und neueste Geschichte am Fachbereich Gesellschaftswissenschaften der Universität Kassel angenommen worden ist. Erster Gutachter war Herr Prof. Dr. Jens Flemming, zweiter Gutachter Herr Prof. Dr. Dietmar Hüser. Die Disputation fand am 9. Juli 2009 statt. Zuallererst möchte ich all jenen meinen herzlichen Dank sagen, die mich während der Abfassung meiner Dissertation beraten und unterstützt haben. Der erste Dank gilt meinem verehrten akademischen Lehrer, Herrn Prof. Dr. Jens Flemming, der in allen Höhen und Tiefen entscheidenden Anteil an meiner Arbeit genommen hat. Seiner Betreuung und seinen profunden geschichtlichen Kenntnissen über Deutschland und Osteuropa hat diese Arbeit sehr viel zu verdanken. Bedanken möchte ich mich auch bei Herrn Prof. Dr. Dietmar Hüser für die konstruktiven Gespräche und die Übernahme des Korreferats.
    [Show full text]
  • Kurt Baschwitz a Pioneer of Communication Studies and Social Psychology
    Van Ginneken Van Kurt Baschwitz BabetteJaap van HellemansGinneken Kurt Baschwitz A Pioneer of Communication Studies and Social Psychology Kurt Baschwitz Kurt Baschwitz Pioneer of Communication Studies and Social Psychology Jaap van Ginneken Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Present-day kiosk or newspaper-stand, Nice, early 2017 Picture taken by the author Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 604 6 e-isbn 978 90 4853 728 0 (pdf) doi 10.5117/9789462986046 nur 681 / 775 Creative Commons License CC BY NC ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0) The author / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2018 Some rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, any part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise). Every effort has been made to obtain permission to use all copyrighted illustrations reproduced in this book. Nonetheless, whosoever believes to have rights to this material is advised to contact the publisher. ‘We want to hope, that practical politics will also acknowledge […] the rediscovery of the overwhelmingly large majority of decent people’. (Final sentence of Kurt Baschwitz’s key work Du und die Masse, published in the fateful year 1938) Table of Contents Preface 15 1 Introduction 17 Baschwitz’s significance 17 A very European intellectual 19 Causes of neglect 20 Approach of this study 22 Outline 24 A note on documentation 25 2 1886-1914: Youth and First Journalism 27 Wider historical background: ‘German exceptionalism’? 27 The liberal southwest 30 The Baschwitz family name and roots 31 A book-printer dynasty 33 Jewish assimilation and resurgent anti-Semitism 35 German education 37 The Baschwitz’s family life 38 School and student years 39 The early German social sciences 41 Baschwitz’s Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Zeichen Im Kostümball
    Das Zeichen im Kostümball Marianne und Germania in der politischen Ikonographie Dissertation Zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr.phil) vorgelegt Der Philosophischen Fakultät der Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Fachbereich Geschichte, Philosophie, Sozialwissenschaften von Esther-Beatrice Christiane von Bruchhausen geb. am 20.10.1971 in Mainz 1999 Gutachter Prof. Dr. Richard Saage Prof. Dr. Herfried Münkler Dr. habil. Walter Reese-Schäfer 0 Danksagung Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde 1999 von der Abteilung Politikwissenschaft der Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg als Dissertation angenommen. Gefördert wurde die Promotion durch ein dreijähriges Forschungsstipendium der DFG im Rahmen des Graduiertenkollegs „Identitätsforschung“ an der Martin Luther-Universität. Mein Dank geht an meine Doktorväter Herfried Münkler, der mir noch an der Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin den ersten Anstoß zur Auseinandersetzung mit der symbolischen Repräsentation der Nation durch das Medium Denkmal gegeben hat, sowie an Richard Saage, Walter Reese-Schäfer und Heinz-Gerhard Haupt, die die Entstehung der Arbeit in Halle begleitet haben. Großen Dank schulde ich meinen Weggefährten des Graduiertenkollegs. Suzanne M. Bleier, Robert Gugutzer, Dagmar Günther, Sibylle Kalupner, Werner Kogge, Monika Kubrova, Karen Schniedewind und Gitta Teubner-Mangue haben immer wieder mit mir diskutiert, Ungereimtheiten kritisch angemerkt und mir mit Kommentaren und Ratschlägen weitergeholfen. Edda von Bruchhausen und Kathrin Mayer haben geduldig die verschiedenen Manuskriptfassungen gelesen, schonungslos Seiten durchgestrichen und Kommentare und Korrekturen beigesteuert. Allen verleihe ich den Orden For bravery in the field. Weiterhin bedanke ich mich ganz herzlich bei Birgit Glock und Stefan Aschneider, die mich in mitunter unangenehmen Phasen stets unterstützt und die Richtung dieser Dissertation maßgeblich mitbestimmt haben. Gewidmet ist diese Arbeit Christiane Hein-Waigand.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionalism and Its Diverse Framings in German-Speaking Europe Across the Long Twentieth-Century
    Regionalism and its Diverse Framings in German-speaking Europe Across the Long Twentieth-Century Jeremy DeWaal Introduction In the 1950s, a German regionalist from the city of Lübeck, reflecting on the plight of German expellees, wrote on how being forced out of one’s regional place of home was to be made into an ‘only German,’ a term that sounded ‘uncanny’ to his ears. They must never, he argued, abandon the regionalist and federalist ideas. 1 The passage reflected a notion of Germanness as defined by regional diversity—an idea popularized by the ‘Heimat movement’ around the turn of the century. The idea of ‘Heimat’ referred to a sense of belonging and cultural uniqueness within local and regional places that could be extended abstractly to the nation at large. The concept proved central to German, Austrian, and Swiss regionalisms, which promoted regional cultural particularities through ‘Heimat books,’ ‘Heimat journals,’ ‘Heimat festivals,’ and diverse ‘Heimat traditions.’ While this chapter focuses primarily on regionalism in Germany, the question of ethnically-mixed regions, contested borderlands, shifting national borders, and violent struggle over who and what regions belonged to the nation render a broader purview of German-speaking Europe useful. At different times, millions of ethnic German regionalists lived either outside Germany or, particularly in the latter half of the century, within a German nation-state but outside of regions from which they had been expelled. A broader purview on German-speaking Europe, meanwhile, allows for comparative consideration of examples from neighbouring Austria and Switzerland, which demonstrate both parallel and divergent developments. The political framings of regionalism in German-speaking Europe were diverse.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hungarian German Minority Under Károlyi, Kun and Bethlen
    Between Volk and Staat – The Hungarian German minority under Károlyi, Kun and Bethlen, 1918-1924 by Sebastian Garthoff Submitted to Central European University History Department In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Supervisor: Prof. András GerĘ Second Reader: Prof. Viktor Karády CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2008 Statement of Copyright Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may no be made without the written permission of the Author. CEU eTD Collection i Abstract The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the time of the Hungarian revolutions of 1918 and 1919 in regard to the German minority and thus show how this laid the basis for the future interaction between Hungarian German leadership and state. In this sense, I will answer the question to what extent the future radicalization in the 1930s on both sides – state and minority – were rooted in this time and which factors stood behind this development. Being bound to both Volk and Staat, it is also of interest regarding how the political awakening Swabians tried to achieve their goals, together with or against the government. My focus lies on the period between 1918 and 1924, i.e. from the time of the Hungarian revolutions till the Sopron plebiscite, the abolishment of the Ministry for Nationalities and the consolidation of the Bethlen regime, when the future directions on both sides, minority and state, seemed already clear.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT: II 1.UNIFICATION of ITALY Dr.P. Suresh, Ph.D., Background Of
    UNIT: II 1.UNIFICATION OF ITALY Dr.P. Suresh, Ph.D., Background of the Unification of Italy The Italian Peninsula had fragmented into different city-states upon the demise of the Western Roman Empire in 476 AD. Although briefly united under the Ostrogothic Kingdom, it again fell to disunity following the invasion of the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) in the 500s. The northern half of Italy was under the control of the Holy Roman Empire (a German- speaking Empire) beginning in the 8th century while the central and the southern half were intermittently governed between the Kingdom of Naples, Kingdom of Sicily and the Papal States. The state of affairs continued well into the 17th century until the rise of the Italian city-states, such as Milan and Venice, changed the balance of power in the region. Wars would be fought between the states and the Holy Roman Empire culminating in the Peace of Westphalia in 1648. Although it would end the involvement of the Holy Roman Empire, most of Northern Italy would still be ruled by the Spanish branch of the Habsburgs, who ruled the Holy Roman Empire at the time. The Spanish Wars of succession would end the Habsburg Rule in Italy by 1714 Italy was thus divided into many small principalities, and it would remain that way until the outbreak of the French Revolution in 1789. Italy under Napoleon Towards the end of the French Revolution, Napoleon Bonaparte would begin a series of wars that would change the political landscape of Europe for years to come.
    [Show full text]
  • The Course of German History
    1 The Course of German History In those extraordinary months after the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, when discussion of the unifi cation of the two Ger- manies was for the fi rst time in forty years back on the serious politi- cal agenda, many voices were raised giving views on ‘the German question’. From a variety of quarters, prejudices were aired which had lain dormant – along with the memories, gas masks and other relics of the Second World War – over the years when the Cold War and the balance of terror had seemed to ensure a fragile peace in a divided Europe. Suddenly, the prospect of a united, economically powerful, and politically sovereign Germany, active again in central Europe and in a position to mediate between East and West, aroused strong emotions among those whose view of Germany had been largely confi ned to an ill-assorted combination of images of Hitler and sleek West German capitalist competitors. Who were the Germans? What was their national character, if they had one? Who were those people who called themselves Germans, from the other, eastern, side of the rapidly crumbling Iron Curtain, who in many ways seemed not a bit like their western brothers and sisters? Pro- voked into having to make a rapid response to the collapse of com- munist rule in Eastern Europe, many people outside Germany found they had a serious defi cit of knowledge and understanding. Many Germans, too – both East and West – found that the Iron Curtain, and the proclaimed ‘zero hour’ of 1945, had raised barriers to informed interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Building and the Origins of Disciplinary Specialization In
    State-building and the Origins of Disciplinary Specialization in Nineteenth Century Germany Jacob Habinek University of California, Berkeley Department of Sociology 410 Barrows Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-1980 [email protected] 1 February, 2010 State-building and the Origins of Disciplinary Specialization in Nineteenth Century Germany Abstract Scholars have long debated why the sciences became organized into specialized disciplines during the nineteenth century. The Prussian university reforms and the institutionalization of research in the German universities have occupied a central position in these discussions. Using records of the appointments of full professors in the life sciences at German universities from 1770 to 1880, this paper investigates whether the Prussian and other reforms led professors to specialize into disciplines and universities to hire from an open academic labor market. The results show that the reforms did not encourage competition and disciplinary specialization across the German universities. Until the 1840s, reforms encouraged professors to pursue scientific research to the exclusion of traditional subjects, but not to specialize within single disciplines. Outside of Prussia, Baden, and Bavaria, university hiring practices also continued to favor the internal promotion of students until relatively late in the century. In contrast to theories of disciplinary specialization emphasizing the institutionalization of scientific autonomy through the Prussian university reforms, I argue that the political integration of German territories and the exploding university enrollments of the late nineteenth century were necessary conditions for the initial adoption of disciplinary organization. These changes did not directly follow from the university reforms, but rather we connected to the ongoing political and economic development of German states over the course of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Unification of Germany
    Unification of Germany The Unification of Germany into the German Empire, dominated by Prussia with a federalist structure was announced on 18 January 1871 in the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles in France. This event would have a major impact on European politics for decades. Background of the Unification of Germany Before unification, Germany was a collection of small kingdoms that came into existence following the Treaty of Verdun in 843. These kingdoms would form the basis of the Holy Roman Empire. Yet, there was no homogenous German identity until the 19th century. This was in part due to the autonomy of the princely states and most inhabitants not ruled directly by the Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire largely identified with their prince instead of the German emperor This system of having small states within the empire was called “practice of kleinstaaterei” or ​ ​ “practice of small states”. It was during the onset of the Industrial Revolution that brought about an improvement in transportation and communication, ultimately bringing far-flung regions in close contact with each other The scenario changed upon the defeat and dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire by France during the Napoleonic Wars in 1806. Even though a German Confederation was re-established following the French defeat in 1815, a huge wave of German nationalism swept through the region at the beginning of the 19th century. This wave of nationalism gave rise to the demands of a centralized authority by the mid 19th century. The rise of Prussia The Congress of Vienna in 1815 had established a confederation of German states under the leadership of the Austrian Empire.
    [Show full text]