Pos(ICHEP2016)037

Home , Mu to E Gamma, Oliver Buchmueller

PoS(ICHEP2016)037

s, s, altering” altering” - http://pos.sissa.it/

, the, tools we need to to many.

) accelerator & cosmological observation cosmological & accelerator -

September 04, 2016 04, September

ND 4.0). -

Dedication Gino Bolla Bolla Gino NC - physicist, friend and colleague and friend physicist, and the importance of being a united global field to make

cs of this talk. this of cs : The: Future of Particle Physics ox.ac.uk . and uniqueand September 25, 1968 1968 25, September (

great great discoveries, remarkable

ly that knowledge to understand the birth, evolution and fate of the universe. Our universe.the of fate evolutionand birth,understand knowledgethe tothat ly A

NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY License 4.0 International NoDerivatives -

ian.shipsey@physics NonCommercial -

scientific scientific advances: topi the are goal our toward progress As a community, our goal is to understand the fundamental nature of energy, matter, space, As and space, of a matter, our nature energy, goal is community, the fundamental to understand app to andtime, non accelerator, tools: manyuse we and broad is scope goal our madetowards havewe progress The play. to role critical a have all paradigm or “transformational achieving for have we opportunities the further, progress mail: mail: 10 August 2016 August 10 Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Creative terms the author(s) of under the the by owned Copyright -

- ã Attribution Chicago, USA Chicago, Physics Energy High on Conference International 38th 3

Ian Shipsey Oxford of University Kingdom United Oxford, E Vision and Outlook

PoS(ICHEP2016)037

. . - s y n for

Our Our s nited nited t . atio r particle particle tanding goal, goal, the ene IanShipsey ccoun on in 1931 our our species,

d and and d matter, space, space, matter, f mystery has l o e t know the dark the know t Our Our history is a fi se at at this remarkable n the neutr with new g new with toiling day and night,anddaytoiling its underlying code,

Higgs Higgs th us in sprit. They are e apart and a apart e

s . We don’We . r The The se portance portance of being a u boson boson in 2012 that enables l is a is l achieving achieving “transformational

m accelerator accelerator & cosmological

e 911 and

- . Models of particle physics and and physics particle of Models

od re dark re

for he he i iggs . in 1 e Universe

s d t ve ve ur a ur ng, weak gravitational lensing, SN1a lensing, gravitational weak ng, an

, dard M dard cleu ther but it challenges our unders we we ha tan e gress gress we have made towards our y of the H S

o is the work of >20,000 colleagues around the>20,000colleaguesaround of work the is abstracts abstracts were submitted, of which 600 were tog

haring haring a common vision th the other fo other the ic and gives us the confidence to be worth

t establishes our credibility our establishes t 2 e cover s s r 1600 The The pr alactic rotation curves, hot gas in clusters, the Bullet Bullet the clusters, in gas hot curves, rotation alactic

publ . g

have have been rigorously tested in some cases to 1 part in Dark energy drives our unive our drives energy Dark understanding understanding of th

. great great discoveries

utionize utionize our knowledge again.

o the di ing of the universe has been a century in the making t

d he he opportunities understand the fundamental nature of energy, energy, of nature fundamental the understand - A record strong gravitational lensi gravitational strong

At the heart of the of heart the At , t e Physics e in the unive the in to . Recountingi .

tom we lay out ambitious plans for the future. future. the for plans ambitious out lay we

toward our goal are the topics of this talk. the electron in 1896, the nu

be proud! proud! be

- is overwhelming is ess ess Through Through careful measurement, observation and deduction we have

y matter y

r matter matter holds our universe . a ose ose the a our goal is goal our k

g an understan p , r n speakers from around the world overviewed results presented at the parallel . Most could not come to Chicago but they are wi a The power that drives the wave wave the drives that power The m

new generations of the D

. uildi to progress further b ions.

he evidence he all all have a critical role to play , d

, to make progr that are highly predictive and s more acute in our field. field. our in acute more These These are among the highest intellectual achievements in the history of

altering” altering” scientific advances: . les that co m the of discovery n - exist , yet t yet , c e o Cosmic Microwave Background Microwave Cosmic i r s a communitya s field

F be l

The The potential now exists to revol

It It is important to be proud of what our community has accomplished. A

ICHEP was like a tidal wave. art a onsible for the remarkable results we have seen this past week past this seen have we results remarkable the for onsible every gram of ordin of gram every p The Standard Model Model Standard The politicians politicians and

or or Cluster, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, Bang Big Cluster, andthe never that is an enigma F quantum developed remarkably successful prevailing theories the Standard the theories prevailing successful remarkably developed cosmology 10 billion they will be part of our legacy to future generations for eternity the atoms to community has revolutionized human structure and evolution remarkable track record of success of record track remarkable of as forebears our of descendants paradigm glob 1.1 and time, and to apply that knowledge to understand the birth, evolution and fate of the universe the of fate and evolution birth, the understand knowledgeto that apply to and time, and Our scope is broad and we observation use many tools: accelerator, non tools we nee globe, students, post docs, engineers, technicians, scientists and professors, professors, and scientists technicians, engineers, docs, post students, globe, making the measurements and the calculations; s cosmos is knowable resp selected for parallel presentations and 500 for posters by 65 conveners. 36 sessions, plenary During three days of sess poster and Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision Introduction PoS(ICHEP2016)037

: l r s a A In

we we we the hat hat tr

s). alone alone W en of the the of repeat where where

, and toand , at at high Cosmic Cosmic

e can trace trace can e IanShipsey quality and and quality Why Why do the odel odel guided of of question . What is the In the second the

today when ass of the Higgs the of ass and the section the Higgs for dark energy dark for Does Does the Higgs

(Figure 1) (Figure - , s e or or there was new lose theorems. as we did with did we as I c

(generations) high. ?

down dominate st en the m the - mained. W mained. by a factor of at least cross level of familiarity questions

particles? particles? Is

L when every billion matter matter billion every when V her her no

is a dynamic combination s. It may be due to a scala a to due be may It s. L

rt he he Standard M 32 t - must must exi

to fermions?

is operating to maintain its lowmaintainoperatingits to is , and the number 10 of particles of

- reaking? y different place

no fu t line of evid of line t

B . 33 c - The need for detail ( detail for need The with Lincoln is Lincoln with .

we we know, and what we are made of, coupling rity

le matter particle re particle matter le a known image of Lincoln Lincoln of image known e distin e i - in the galaxy distribution o at a ver lose theorems for the W and the top the andW the theorems forlose e le the Higgs What is the relationship between the Higgs Higgs the between relationship the is What What What ementary or composite the s ymmetry - r

c of of the object and the i , is just the tip of the iceberg. ? S of a very famous historical figure then shown then figure historical famous very a of lanck scale .

no a sing a

r famil 3 eak m 1967 until 2012 the well the o y recognize it as the face of Lincoln because because Lincoln of face the as it recognize y r W rigin of Before Before the Higgs was found there was one c - thei Why does the pattern the does Why

dil scillations scillations o

here are th are here a . F at all (in the Standard Model they are massless)? massless)? are they Model Standard the (in all at regularize the divergent V O ) a little data goes a long way (top a new part

Following the inflationary period the universe continued continued universe the period inflationary the Following re

Why Why are there so many types of lectro Is the Higgs el er particles er its discovery there are many more

ow did matter survive the big bang? Some phenomena must must phenomena Some bang? big the survive matter did ow t

iggs distinctiveness distinctiveness ? mass mass r (data driven) processing driven) (data

before

erse. T erse. eak phase transition? phase eak e H dark energy became important. became energy dark

s after the big bang until 10 until bang big the after s What What is

(our understanding of the universe) e Physics e el el is complete we know of iv w mat

of particle phyiscs particle of up 36 coustiic coustiic

- n ? - - We were aided by aided were We od

A and

, n could be valid to the P the to valid be could e exponential expansion of the early universe natural: what new physics/symmetry new what natural: lectro h e range of masses? of range rd M

aryo a it is it . Dark energy is a mystery of data and they and data of Do Higgs decays violate CP violate decays Higgs Do B Perception Perception

these survivors. to present a subject with subject a present to oss oss section either I gical gical

r ? op quark ere ere so many questions we are al tand ? Higgs boson and E and boson Higgs t c

rdmodel S energy of the u the of energy - Standard Model Standard W, questions continues: h continues: questions the tuned osmolo - the Higgs we have found Why do neutrinos have neutrinos do Why c When we know the characteristics and context of what to expect ( expect to what of context and characteristics the know we When

. Hubble Plot, Hubble with a paucity paucity a with

Now Now oes oes

have such a large a such have ) or is there a new dynamics L D to dark matter ot ot only are th he list of of list he down (theory) and bottom and (theory) down

- V It is worth considering just how dramatically different the situation with a roadmap and N

In every area of our enquiry we have profound questions T ? L tion: does the Higgs exist. Aft cles annihilated a billion anti billion a annihilated cles in volume, starting about 10 aboutvolume,starting in

i SN1a 78 an image an prior information they have been given and quantity quantity of the data) depends on the it with have the of discovery is this of analog visual face the see to about are they told first is subject the principle the standa the principle is. a roadmap without top of ask these questions than we were guide!goodwas it andresearch regularise the WW physics. M(V or are there other Higgs bosons couple fieldand the increased with the discovery of the Higgs. ques the between relation fine or natural mass powered powered cosmic inflation, t 10 scale. Planck the at physics particle field, to expand but at a slower rate until have produced a small asymmetry between matter and antimatter so that so antimatter and matter between asymmetry small a produced have part our existence back to particles times?three the Background Microwave the by described Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision mass the for 70% PoS(ICHEP2016)037

. , the not not

s are make make taken image rom that they IanShipsey seen before up dominates abruptly abruptly -

lity image a , with a masswitha , unless unless there is a on is given about

al to recognize a Dali ti s the first elementary first the s

dependent on dependent bottom

i bottom en

are are d not be surprised to find find to surprised be not d l . Most subjects invariably subjects Most . its mass (left). (left).

e ly better qu hoc pot hoc

ion very similar to recognizing roadmap The Higgs Higgs The

sive at . and no informati s tu , an ad an increas

(Figure 2) (Figure si

roadmap we a

a succe

Measure Measure what is measureable and s arantee arantee discoveries beyond the Standard d with d l original is presented to the subject subject the to presented is original to use top down processing : “ e the same painting natutrally natutrally

Without Without of of cs cs was in 4 i lution s will will

is an effective theory effective an is

l e their ability lose theorems Without a I. Shipsey - -- Dali masterpiece “The Disintegration of “The of Dali the masterpiece Disintegration Persistence quantum of a fi a of quantum more more than ever ICHEP 2016

, this remains true a have have much less familiarity e Physics e ileo). The discussion of the future of HEP must start f 2012 with the standard model as a guide top down processing to - is is removed. They are shown an image that they have it is the is it

s a long way. This is analogous to recognizing the Lincoln , and when the full reso full the when .” (Gal accelerator, accelerator, which can gu low resolution image - ur ur job in a data driven era m corrections which re are no more no answers to the great questions of our field. We shou We field. our of questions great the to answers It It is only antu to recognizing the qu low resolution image of Lincoln (left). the road map

em. we have seen, seen, have we

From From 1967 to 2012 particle phy

a little data goe

experiment the subject has - provide provide rom

e, with little e, information with to little guide us. (right)from the f to th Today, Today, the here because the Standard Mod Standard the because here ticle

During During the period 1967

d and ed s an image with which they

te i In consequence, o

en odel otect pr understanding understanding that there is no experiment or facility proposed or conceivable, in the lab or space, in accelerator or non M ourselves par 0 spin Memory” Memory” so not is what measureable Figure Figure 2 This is analogous dominated dominated (right)from the Figure Figure 1 recognize it. the image of Lincoln. Since 2012 we are in a situation where we are trying masterpiec are we information, up away, in effect but it Memory” of Persistence “The Dali’s is image The image. the do not recognize the image pres Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision part of the PoS(ICHEP2016)037

, e be be nd So So

a Our Our e. e. degre l make energy Bare mass in Planck units mass Bare plor Precision Precision top quark IanShipsey

A balanced balanced A ). ). Often when Often is the modus ibly imagine.ibly the it is premature

Nobody Nobody would , from across the

tement still holds sta

is how we wil that was the case for hey hey seem to many to We can be confident We can be confident quark

s , ’ theory n . T an is for us to ex otherwise we otherwise would not be

Newto

As a community we collectively collectively we community a As the beauty .

collaborations are the proof. proof. the are collaborations the oce . , lues of other observables could ” ry k scale then this is what the the what is this then scale k king together king s OK to dream? It is a betrayal of ”; ”; c l of the words of Michelangelo I or That That pondering the constancy of the tific . lan W to understandto universe.the d something new

k.” k.” . ndfu scien and the va andthe

in terms of the multiverse) but )

to name just a few (see Figure 3 charm quark

of last resort last of

made made up of myriad individuals 5 ing ale is the P the is ale

and enact it. Massive collaboration the ; n c

black black body radiation would have led to an entirely Naturalness The The mass of the Higgs, the amount of dark , , at at special relativity and quantum mechanics would

Th aside and seek and aside in mind we fin the t know is an Ocean

international . ’ l 2 a

dark dark energy s the solution the s

the public to be of the order of the of cut-off. to bethe of order i Our Our work has the potential to lead to a of reconciliation the

e Physics e If the next s next the If it

H and k units looks like: looks units k “ CP CP violation

was presented at ICHEP. While supersymmetry is still the leading leading the still is supersymmetry While ICHEP. at presented was c s e to reveal a cosmos more wonderful than we can poss can we than wonderful more cosmos a reveal to e lan overy overy when new exploring territo interpretation P nu

d example of fine tu fine of example d isc s e ment ment with a go t Experiments that explore uncharted territory, or study phenomena we do phenomena study or territory, uncharted explore that Experiments ri tions inspire . time in physics we need to be mi e mas

uth has said said has uth p ed (the naturalness problem). Operators of d < 4 suffer from a naturalness problem; in the in problem; naturalness a from suffer 4 < d Operatorsof expect thewould one principle symmetry a of absence M of value the in quadratic cut- are to the Higgs mass corrections Loop off. to the Planck mass, valid is model if the standard So The complete Lagrangian takes the form viewed as an as Lagrangian takes complete viewed theThe form theory effective

nt eld, the successful large large successful the eld, matter s connec ❖ ❖ ❖ ❖ - cience cience progresses by experimentation, observation, and s program does that. be an unnatural situation. unnatural an be

theorists are also studying alternatives such as the “relaxion”. This shifts attention toattention shifts “relaxion”. Thisthe as studyingalternativessuchalso aretheorists

are are a key to d

. diverse diverse interests working together to achieve goals scientific

o he greater danger for most of us lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; short; falling and high too aim our setting in not lies us of most for danger greater he naturalness problem problem naturalness neutrino neutrino oscillation

T t , perhap “

to set the multiversetheset to : with with ur program will conti will program ur understand not do we much so is there know we do only not for optimism, naive not is This Indeed, s Some suggest that the universe is the way it is because if it was it if because is way it the is universe the that Some suggest o gluon following great discoveries: what we know is a droplet what we what we what don know a is droplet another

international collabora globe, be. could world the how for model a and humanity of best the of example an be aim big aim but in setting our aim too low, and achieving our mar do otherwise to us follow that and generations humanity the case for our program, win funding for it fi our of operandi the the instrumen “ at this unprecede that about the cosmos but also our past experience points to one surprise after another. we embark on an ex speed of light would have led to E= mc have to anti led not understand with greater precision, lead to a deeper understanding of nature, the global high energy physic two great edifices of physics Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity. experiments have predicted that in slight irregularities new conception of the world in terms of quantum theory to think so as Alan G Alan as so think to choose the of view explanation, the dynamics of the early universe, with consequences that may be observable in future here to observe it ( vacuum (our effects selection universe interpreted of fine tuning in bare bare in tuning fine of this seems t Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision tuning. fine of remarkabledegree PoS(ICHEP2016)037

in in

The The al

. What What

mental mental decision decision are are both nda IanShipsey perception perception he he discovery of t

ent with a go with ent cable cable for pulsed scovery in particle Slide**3* m he questions we ask we questions he discoveries discoveries ri and T

e , r di .

p s: factors go into a into go factors to the general public, can n of our field and we should should we and field our of

Adapted!from!S.!Ting! ,(charm(quark( Gluon( include These These so tau(lepton(

top(quark( Dark(energy( . in 2012 charm(quark(( Discovery(with((

bo\om(quark( rea it is onlyis it possible tohave come

Partons Neutrino(oscillaSons( Precision(Instrument( e he he LHC, the experiments and the Two(kinds(of(neutrinos(( Curvature(of(the(universe( Neutral(Currents(V>(Z,W( t Increasing(pp(cross(secSon( What What is the world made of?

For millenia all great societies have have societies great all millenia For breadth of the opportunities in front front in opportunities the of breadth Time(reversal(nonVsymmetry( public of our nations why the world world whythe nations our of public

. thre are

the s global global appeal Our field helps to provide that that provide to helps Our field at least least at

pp( ,(QED( the fabric of the physical sciences of developed 6 ep top(quark(( and the global nature of our field, our long term of of (N(interacSons( (N(interacSons( Proton(Decay(

SN(Cosmology(( Expert(Opinion(

, π π Neutrino(Physics( Original(purpose,(( a global phenomenon

rime example There are are There . r nations to pursue ome specific innovations

. Given the magnitude and magnitude the Given ((2000)( . Two p

e Physics e How did the world begin? world the did How

that almost everyone, from children

Crucial Crucial allies are governments and the public. There is an e help draw people to the physical sciences and help fill the

that became

. nations waiting to be to answered. waiting Kamiokande Precision(instruments(are(key(to(discovery(when(exploring(new(territory.(( Lepton'Photon*2015,*Ljubljana,*August*17*'*22,*2015***''*M.*Demarteau* Discoveries in Particle Physics health. health. FNAL(Batavia((1970)( SLAC(Spear((1970)( ISR(CERN((1980)( PETRA(DESY((1980)( Super( Telescopes((2000)( Facility(( P.S.(CERN((1960)( AGS(BNL((1960)(( our our

in 2016 that had even great

It It contributes broadly to other physical sciences: (a) Accelerator science

, of of a Higgs boson

important way. W

he narrative of our field. our of narrative he Discoveries in particle physics. Often when we embark on an ex an on embark we when Often physics. particle in Discoveries esource esource for t To To communicate what we have learned and the opportunities fo

history history of innovation in accelerator science that particle physics has largely driven is a r questions questions out there an talent. with pipeline education Particle physics is an essential part nations asked these questions these asked sciences the of all to talent young attract ask we questions big The are so big and so simple many many, While way. some in them to relate and understand to pursue a career in science, certainly one factor is the perception of big fu Our Our science is important for ou together? world the holds

& governments to explain must must narrative The To play a major role in this journey of discovery is the aspiration aspiration the is discovery of journey this in role major a play To

itational waves 3) 2) 1) nd we find something new. (From an original slide by S.C.C. Ting.) S.C.C. by slide original an (From new. something find we nd ways remember that it is a rare privilege to participate in it and it in participate to privilege rare a is it that remember ways nprecedented nprecedented interest in our field needs a healthy particle physics program physics particle healthy a needs observation grav and of our governments the our colleagues, to expand public, engagement with the opportunities nations. physics: who invest their money in science. in money their invest who of us, the resources required to grasp them be will partnerships international strong and perspective, international an maintain to has strategy crucial to our future u Figure mi al this far, and to go further, thanks to the taxpayers of our nations and the wisdom of governments Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

. to way way - t you t Strong Strong ersonal ersonal specific Reliable Reliable - Detector Detector P has has been

Convince Convince e tha e

IanShipsey . ? (b) What What is the

each hosting .

and

it’s a two a it’s

he regions can can regions he t noted by others others by noted model

report focuses at (iii) (iii)

. en rt the development the rt the project global global vision. : work: work: Convince m Convince tantial participation at ilitating the regions

cience cience case P ? Of course course Of can fac class class facilities that engage lan - (c) Large Scale computing As has be has As

to understand the universe it . . . ty facilities hosted elsewhere specific benefits e web. e -

Some of the essential ingredients ingredients essential the of Some achievable achievable

ects. ects. This global perspective has

hat hat is the s n the second project p project priori

- we believe believe we

roject of of a P (i) (i) W

nfrastructure to suppo to nfrastructure , Report Report of the Subcommittee on Future way , i , the world wid world the ational ational science project. This

highlights collaboration on the most important important most the on collaboration highlights host host unique, world between between the regions; It It is not primarily What is the is What

7 he Higgs and gravitational wave discoveries have have discoveries wave gravitational and Higgs he to ve ve T iment, and collaborating on several other domestic ns ns will say

(ii) (ii) ti a . nce? i

P5 Report Report P5

European European Strategy for Particle Physics , for examplefor , Politic competi

Positron Positron Emission Tomography Intimately related to the need for healthy infrastructure is the e Physics e

me and partnering me in and high partnering , the Klystron and the development of light sources light of development the and Klystron the , dependent dependent on innovations in accelerator science . , expresses interest in hosting the International Linear Collider scope, costs and schedule are under control

. at FNAL. at are are an essential component

The The 2013 that Japan, following its 2012 . long term vision and strategy to guide the program for future decades.futureprogramforthe guide strategyto andvisionterm long Kamiokande exper Kamiokande

en a lot of thought. Here is a is Here thought. of lot a en - all all of this? a

rically been ositive ositive environment for science o P for example /DUNE

ed on the most compelling science compelling most the on ed

en giv en s , and , we are in very good shape. good very in are we e

b P on frontiers is i Convince me that this is a good use of public money public of use good a is this that me Convince

class class facilities at ho science with big tools requires the infrastructure to support the development of those of development the support to infrastructure the requires tools big with science - required am focus am

Why do governments support scie support Why do governments

development collaborations large by driven physics particle physicalsciencesothercontributeto street: superconducting magnets superconducting al scientific community including DUNE and cosmic frontier experiments. DUNE community including frontier cosmicand scientific al What does a healthy particle physics program look like? look program physics particle healthy a does What worldwide resonance worldwide tools

progr hosting hosting and partnering For the first first the For So So how do we fund Our big big Our The The field has hist

ng as an exemplar of a successful large intern a What does a healthy particle physics program look like? like? look program physics particle healthy a does What

oth usiness case? usiness artnerships artnerships are essential for the success of international proj ntensity/precis benefits? is because of the technological innovations it spawns and the skills needed. Science is an we we need three P’s: a policymakers with connections created an exceptionally positive environment. How about excellent scientifically is project this that me know what you are doing: b Projects Projects of High Energy Physics (ILC), pursuing the Hyper U.S 2014 The projects. international and scientific opportunities wherever they are, and the glob need need for a strong program in accelerator R&D. The future of particle physics at the energy and i p found CERN on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) program and envisions subs facilities in other regions. servi LBNF the by adopted tools for today and for the futur work together has has together work together address the full breadth of the field's most urgent scientific questions unique world B foundations of international cooperation exist, with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN are: the of 1.2 Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

s, s, of of ch 50 ith ful

i 1 Full Full a – major major . 1, 1, and , most ut ut it is fb

benefit benefit uilding uilding

- and ely , b s IanShipsey i ost a beaut t as the SM ). The ). iggs new particles 4

opportunity opportunity to jus The light The Higgs light

gram starts w starts gram (left) s It It is certainly the . o

e to our institution our to r . of underestimation underestimation of igure

and again. B every

ns ns lings prec (F edictability edictability of future particle physics in the the in physics particle

ike SM H or or the LHC the authors behav in F

. This p This . LHC using a c 10σ Take Take

). politicia precision precision in couplings erated. erated. 1987 g - ure ure the coup invite g s uro, uro, not considering the unpredictable Speaker Speaker of the United States House of (right) which demonstrates that the Higgswhichdemonstratesthe (right) that (

nually nually Full Full exploitation of a precision electron

study the Higgs and look for . there is much scope for improvement ” have limited interactions with politicians. As politicians. with interactions limited have

by claims that the unpr Until now, the application of CBA resear to application the now, Until of the most important important most the of conti

, and so far the Higgs ts the Higgs looks just l

ere 8 then invite them back again en H Figure 5 Figure

one one e this e to this the estimated cost of the LHC which is ~ 6 ? agreement is captured in Figure 5 as as been conducted for the

we we need to mea P

sed on Higgs couplings to fermions and vector bosons vector and fermions to couplingsHiggs on sed e must e h the production of Higgs particles in association with a s urem projects. s W The

in , andin , (Figure 6 left)

(Compar . widely widely used by governments and economists to evaluate the e Physics e A study ll politics is local

in the new data with a significance of significance a with data new the in in 2012in was

a “ [1] ch infrastructure cannot be exa 2 of the LHC has produced more Higgs bosons than in Run

hindered, hindered, however,

o determine

LHC is the path to a few per cent

- he he Higgs boson is the key to understanding EWSB program focu program the longest serving Speaker 1977

on of the mea

, and to do so

i that there is around a 90% probability that benefits exceed costs, with

makers makers of new exploring ways to measure and compare social benefits . A . is - d C/HL how about the third ent ent value of about 2.9 billion e ec established established

- , of the Higgs Higgs the of e , and even the most senior, often senior,most the even and , with politicians is critical to the future of our field. our of future the to critical is politicians with scale resear -

Frontier Already Run Already methodology mass mass determination proton proton collisions delivered to ATLAS and CMS by the time of the conference, Tip Tip O’Neill

– c impact of investment Finally evertheless, evertheless, given the importance and the increasing cost of science, the potential ew analyses is t CBA of research infrastructure is complex and that there is a risk a is there that and complex is infrastructure research of CBA hin hin the pr benefits benefits of science creates a for difficulty any forecasts quantitative discovery discovery The The spectacular performance of the LHC during 2016, which saw about 20

the deep connections to politicians. to connections deep boson, boson, or with a pair of top quarks and These decay their and production patterns. decay fits. fits. N ory ory to verify this

ans themselves know: o wit precision precision economi irect measurement of t at T The The - that d The Energy Energy The

n TeV TeV proton

e Higgs has been r been has Higgs e exploitation exploitation of the LH MeV verification of electroweak unification electroweak of verification mass. to proportional is coupling ma th focus of the n Z W or channels are important tests of Higgs properties predicts within the large uncertainties. 13 gave both experiments unprecedented sensitivity to interactions. and last thirty years. The The d explained be must boson physicsaddressthe requiredto is less or centper few a precisionof a to the LHC. and present to them the narrative of our field, relationships deep 1.3 applications of scientific discovery of applications scientific billion euro.) scientists practicing politici Representative develop of of bene advantages for decision and costs of large conservatively estimate an expected net pres analysis analysis (CBA) socio infrastructure (RI) has been economic case Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision economic driver of job creation. ] et al.

(β-α) < 0 hﬀ cos

Y Oct 15, 2013 5/27 Kanemura i [SFitter; Cacciapaglia and κ ibutions in loops

Z Z Shinya

hVV 3rd-generation one W W

. Full ILC t t ≠1 in the 2HDM-I

hﬀ V g SM i / b b g τ v.s hﬀ can be greater than 1 · , and Y

V ) b only one i τ τ κ = 1.5 TeV) = 1.5 , t f ∆ , with additional factor hVV 43 / not elementary not Z + c c 9 i

PoS(ICHEP2016)037 , 1 ( MCHM5 ( Standard Model γ γ W % % % % % % % % % % % % % % ∆ Z ≡ 55 00 55 00

and

, -5-5 -5-5

1515 1010 1515 1010 for future colliders equal to corresponding Deviation from SM SM from from Deviation Deviation Deviation from SM from Deviation Deviation from SM from Deviation -10-10 -15-15 -15-15 -10-10 +

SM i

γγ quark-Yukawa couplings are universally smaller,

TeV . g 1 , ). SM γ - · I. Shipsey i ∆ -- gg c (grey

+ right :

=1 in the singlet model but

≡ V 1 g / IanShipsey = mass Higgs Higgs mass ICHEP 2016 hﬀ Z plings plings in a ure 6 ure

independent - Y γ - : κ > 1 is a signature of exo)c Higgs (with higher representa)ons) and 3,000 fb

Extended Higgs models are dis)nguishable by precisely measuring

SM V i W (Fig 1 Singlet can be dis)nguished from the Type-I 2HDM In the triplet model, Lepton-Yukawa deviate universal. κ

- ,unlessexplicitlystatedotherwise) GeV g Current LHC data

t gigi.rolandi@cern.ch Pa[ern in devia)ons of · (26) (27) (30) (29) (28) given given values of the κ

i ds: t κ Daniel de Florian allow for additional contributions ≡ Higgs Higgs discovery The precision must be improved in future at LHC 13-14 at the LC

300 fb

c = 700 GeV) = 2nd-generation fermions A What is Higgs really? Higgs is What b deviations induced by changes in tree-levelnew couplings physics contribution can appear at→ same loop-order as SM the 125 the κ i does not disentangle effects g Deﬁne e.g. . , : (26) (27) (30) (29) (28) for ± µ ds: 4 γ = 5, M ν τ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠

β µ → 5relevantcouplingsattree-level: κ (i.e. loop-induced couplings: slight difference κ scale SM Higgs couplings to particle from changes in tree-level couplings and new-physics contr ⇒ W , H ) 2 g H 2 λ L x has siblings v 2 V 2 v 2 ( 1 4 M √ v 2 i ′ c M H , 0 − g 3 i Deﬁnition of scaling factors 3 . , : ansparent if one works in Higgscouplings asafunction theparticleof mass + [ATLAS/CMS; − + samountstoparametrize , etermslinearinthegauge MSSM (tan Rolandi ± Oct 15, 2013 22/27 µ H v [Gupta, Rzehak, Wells] 4 2 ebosons ν Parametrization own compilation] =0 is the path to a model ILC =2 ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ g 2 v % % % % % % % H = µ W , 4 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ H igi H H A ) g

55 00 2 g

syst unc./ H H H eedom using gauge invariance. ! 2 λ

M -5-5

2 x 1515 1010 G H v 2 Deviation from SM from Deviation Deviation from SM from Deviation V 2 v M λ 2 2 H 1 2 -10-10 -15-15 ( 1 4 Precision for H-gauge boson boson H-gauge for Precision sectors H-fermion and M BLOIS May2016 2 λ = = M. Rauch – Coupling ﬁts via signal strength / LHC and prospects √ v 2 the measurements. 4 i

v λ ′ M

notelementary? H , 0 m Onlyone? (SM) ( Z − g 3 W i i n dark shading: current syst/theo unc. light shading: ATLAS: noCMS: theo theo unc./2, unc.

3 remains massless and corresponds to 43 ansparent if one works in / + − 3 M

− + M + H samountstoparametrize )= , etermslinearinthegauge 12 −→

µ 2 H v x 2 ebosons =0 Lumi1920250 = sqrt(s) GeV fb-1, Lumi2670500 = sqrt(s) GeV fb-1, ( =2 3 g B

2 v µ ν H collider) collider) = and self-couplings: H φ ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ hassiblings? (2DHM) )

H H A H H V V g

H H H 2 H H eedom using gauge invariance. ! H 2 µ M 9 2 - −→ −→ v v TeV). M 1 2 λ = M

2 and =

γ λ (2) √ λ gB κ 1 2 %) ) ) $ 3 µ ( ⎠ ⎞ rtaintyo Z W −→ SU µ 2 µ + s at ATLAS and CMS with − 2 11 A =2 10 + remains massless and corresponds to 2 −

) experiments rediscovery of rediscoveryexperiments ) M ) B 3 µ M A )= v ′ Expectation on couplings at the LHCthe at couplings on Expectation weak gauge bosons. One real scalar ﬁeld remains, 2 −→ = µ percent measurement of the couplings the of measurement percent 2 x − x g 2 ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ A g µ ′ gauge symmetry. - ( ± 0 ( µ

κ 4 5 B µ ν ) − 2 and self-couplings: H g 2 φ ( H − ) 1 µ Z ( H H x V V H H 2 0 v H 2 − ) µ H ( em 2 O 3 µ A H ′ −→ Φ 4 1 −→ v 2 λ ( : )Goldstonebosons,havebeenreabsorbedintothelon- . g = † M H 0 and + 0 λ v µ (2) 2 2 x

gB µ (1) gA for future colliders and − 1 2 2

κ ( H 1 )

Z λ ( ) + 3 µ v Φ + 1 a −→ √ U ). (Right) ). The Higgs coupling proportionalis tomass. 3 SU µ 2 2 µ + e Physics e 2 ± 2 − = ′ 11 µ M A χ v =2 # ( g B g 3 µ A = ′ weak gauge bosons. One real scalar ﬁeld remains, 2 ⎛ ⎝ W = vH H 2 2 λ 1 ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ν g ⎞ ⎟ ⎠ √ A + µ

′ τ gauge symmetry. ± ± λ 0 1 µ µ µ κ 4 ⃗τ 2 ) m 2 g ·

2 2 − g 1 µ ) = H 1 Z = ( x g − W H v x 2 = − ( √ 2 em 2 V ( 3 µ A ′ M µ 2 4 1 v " ⃗χ √ ( : Rolandi )Goldstonebosons,havebeenreabsorbedintothelon- 2 H √ 2 i g = M H 0 i v 0 A v width and sub and width µ 2 x H

(1) b 3 gA i " Φ and − 2 e ( 2 H 1 κ m = ): Z ( + Gigi + 2 † 1 a √ U 3 i µ µ )= ,definethecouplingoftheSMHiggsbosontotheweakgaugefiel [email protected] − 2 0 ,withmass ± µ )complexscalarfieldasfollows: 2 ′ µ M 0 χ µ v 3 -1 -1 x H A Φ g blue ellipse blue x g Z he he deviation from the standard model of the Higgs cou -1 -1 = =2 = H ( )= Z ( ( t W = vH ! ⎛ ⎜ ⎝ ν √ x H φ t φ + + ± λ H 1 ( µ µ κ Φ ⃗τ · : Higgs Higgs L 2 V which is given by the quartic coupling φ 2 g ) H H = κ − g W and v x 2 2 V ( quartic self-coupling M µ (ILC, CLIC or circular e+e 2 vH v ⃗χ √ ± √ i µ M i 2 v A Z H 3 κ i e 2 ! W = ): No “official” expectation for Higgs self-couplings ... yet ... yet ... self-couplings Higgs for expectation “official” No mass the measured W mass compared to the measured top mass for detector performance – pile-up, efficencies, . .theory . progress – higher-order corrections, PDFs,new . . analysis . channels µ µ ATLAS 300 fb CMS 300 fb ATLAS 3000 fb CMS 3000 fb ,definethecouplingoftheSMHiggsbosontotheweakgaugefiel − 0 and ,withmass µ )complexscalarfieldasfollows:

4 λ 0 µ Consequences for the scalar field µ ν A x Z Higgs boson =2 = H )= Z H H V V ( Furthermore, some of the terms that we omitted in Eq. (25), th The content of the scalar sector of the theory becomes more tr W = x What to expect from the LHC in the future? cf. expected deviation in BSM models: Difficult question – requires many assumptions: H φ φ = κ H H H ( Precision on L the and for the neutral gauge boson while the orthogonal linear combination of One recognizes in Eq. (25) the mass terms for the charged gaug the photon field ( Three degrees of freedom, the gitudinal components of the bosons after which the scalar potential in Eq. (23) becomes: the gauge boson of the residual the unitary gauge and eliminate the unphysicalIn degrees analogy of to fr what we wroteand for rotate the the abelian case in Eq. (7), thi Extrapolations – LHC Need to measure them to explore explore to them measure to Need mechanism SSB of details the φ (left) Precision of Higgs coupling collider collider (left) gets a cubic The CMS (left) and ATLAS (right ATLAS and (left) CMS The and At At the ILC

0 V

‣ 0.2 0.1 0.3 ± M. Rauch – Coupling ﬁts via signal strength / LHC and prospects at almost twice the collision energy (13 energy collision the twice almost at H µ 0.05 0.25 0.15

W on µ ν Higgs boson H H V V BLOIS May2016 Furthermore, some of the terms that we omitted in Eq. (25), th The content of the scalar sector of the theory becomes more tr (Right) representativeMSSM with ingreen the unce Figure Figure 6 Figure 5 Figure Higgs mass compared to the of prediction the fit electroweak before the aftewards and ellipse) Bos Figure 4 Figure measurement of the the of measurement Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision positron the and for the neutral gauge boson while the orthogonal linear combination of One recognizes in Eq. (25) the mass terms for the charged gaug the photon ﬁeld ( Three degrees of freedom, the gitudinal components of the bosons after which the scalar potential in Eq. (23) becomes: the gauge boson of the residual the unitary gauge and eliminate theIn unphysical degrees analogy of to fr what we wroteand for rotate the the abelian case in Eq. (7), thi scalar ﬁeld scalar potential there is a term of the • • • • expanded around the vacuum state The Consequences: becomes PoS(ICHEP2016)037

. is

. . ) 120 er- (7) (8) (9) / - /v ↵ 2 | 2 H h ifficult ities (Right) m m vacuum |

a similar ymmetry gure 7). gure earches in in earches =3( measured =2 IanShipsey - 2 S ing v

SM hhh (Fi .

s . It is d , among them: a SM hhh ? and

See also Jing Shu and Tao Liu’s talk . 2 erent underlying dynam- potential and how and potential 3) (FCC or v

↵ a single model but / ) 2gives

y break y

2 h ocesses. ocesses. The most The search for them them for search The † p = m h / =(7 ( ) nly nly unused s 2 H  not H m /v

)potential,thecubicself-coupling 2 H + log h 2 † v m ) h he he o h 18 with † t it is =( =7 s attractive h

( , log( h ), ), 2 ]. V collider hhh 1 2 ) ··· h † some assumptionsome +

! h , section it can be wellbe can it section 3 2 ) orm of the potential the of orm - v h H

( f h upling upling cross section

ter and rare pr V ss hhh SUSY = o t o

c 100 Te 2 H 1 6 erence between these possibilities shows up in the cubic . - ). ↵ m + f a SM hhh l 2 ,andweﬁnd e 2 H Good testing case.Good Simplest,but also hardest to discover. 3) ⇤ 2 H | / (1) deviation in the cubic Higgs coupling relative to the SM. In the Consider a model Higgs + singlet + Higgs model a Consider niquely associated with the Higgs. Higgs. the with associated niquely m | O : it should be able to interact not only with 1 2 Figure 8: Question of the nature of the electroweak phase transition. he potential [2 potential he s of the Higgs were reported. These “heavy - =(5 y =2 but but at )= 2 Naturetransition phase EW of SUSY is complex: term in the potential can be neglected. The potential is now minimized hhh v The leading di These possibilities are associated with totally di (Figure8 H

2 h

(

early Coleman-Weinberg proposal for symmetry breaking [17]: ics for electroweak symmetrybeyond breaking the than the Higgs SM, aroundent requiring the theoretical new weak implications physics scale. forstructure naturalness, of They the quantum also hierarchy ﬁeld problem theory. have and radically the di Higgs self-coupling. In the SM, minimizingExpanding the around potential this gives minimum V Consider the example withthe the sake of quartic simplicity balancing tom against illustrate a the sextic point, let and,for us for take the limit where the giving an case with the non-analytic ( is 10 collider. to explorewithoutto lly all models of new physics.new ofmodels all lly H Wednesday, August 13, 14 that Tuesday, January 20, 15

pp H ers, probing

↵ the major advances obtained by going to a 100 TeV pp tivity to the functional ~10 TeV ~10 able able is the Higgs s nsi v to searches for dark ma e ing theory, helps the cosmologicalproblem(10constantthe helps theory, ing r long list of reasons why SUSY i

collider stems from the What is the shape of the symmetry breaking symmetry the of shape the is What e e Physics e 100 TeV pp TeV 100 ed pp CppC) with a much larger cr larger much a with CppC) H

SUSY is too big big too is SUSY . mass reach of new physics new of reach mass the ) uniquely associated with the Higgs. It

The The obs

ally ally link There There is a r n 5

. A sketch A of sketch one of ible” decays into undetected particles, decays into exotic bosons or decays H H (Figure 8 (Figure integ ?

t also with itself. with also t It It is important to remember collider will give s give will collider Group interaction of an elementary particle u ). ).

- ~ TeV ~ (Left) é and 60

- HC new searches looking for heavier cousin L 10 at at high scales? e looking at more challenging scenarios than Run 1. Simplified models are at almost 2 ticles, bu ticles, 100 TeV100 ure ure due to the small cross section at LHC H collider will see, for the ﬁrst time, a fundamentally new dynamical process

HC will only probe the small quadratic oscillations around the symmetr the around oscillations quadratic small the probe only will HC

essentia in needed are particles mass TeV Many Many Figure 7

The The Higgs must also have a propert dynamical

pp HC L he LHC will only probe the small, quadratic oscillations around the symmetry breaking vacuum, vacuum, breaking symmetry the around oscillations quadratic small, the probe only will LHC he reduced to framework large a Run 2, ar squarks top for TeV a almost and gluons for TeV is imperative popular extension of the Standard Model is Supersymmetry ( of the Poincar a forces, the of unification scalars, for rationale a problem, (naturalness) hierarchy the to solution str by needed candidate, matter dark a pair of Higgs bosons. Other searches covered the possibility that the Higgs boson exotic decays: itself “invis has that violate the conservation of lepton flavour. possibil menu of full the of coverage and sensitivity increasing providing are experiments No signals have emerged yet, but the LHC T t of structure global the of idea any us giving without into decay might or itself, Higgs the to similar very ways in decay could produced, once Higgs”, collider. collider. The 100 TeV pp collider will see, for the first time, a fundamentally self the process new dynamical The L The a while other par other is restored to meas know China in machine Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision 100 TeV pp TeV 100 The Higgs must also have a dynamical property we have never seen for the self-interaction of an elementary particle will also improve the reachof of 5. the direct search of new physics particles byexcitement at surrounding least the a proposal factor ofbold a leap 100 into TeV the completely uncharted new territory that it o Figure 1: A sketch ofThe two 100 of TeV the major advances obtained by going to a 100 TeV only scratch the surfacecollider of we this will physics, be but ableself-interaction with to unambiguously the process, see data whose and from precisely structuremass the measure is the 100 of Higgs TeV deeply the related Higgs to itself. the origin At and an even more fundamental level, much of the other scalar particlessize we close have to seen their havebe Compton been more radius. point-like obviously than The composite, naturally Higgs with expected is on a not theoreticalany like of grounds. this, the appearing other to fundamentalwith particles: other it particles, should but bebasic also able of with to itself! all interact processes not Indeed,forbid only allowed self-interaction point-like by is self-couplings the quantum for most ﬁeld all particles theory, but but the spin Higgs. and charge The LHC will PoS(ICHEP2016)037

. 29 - e er to of of

are are hip hip

HC HC s s deep deep ment ment L

n USY t de s S e ICHEP.

lda v t i owing the IanShipsey While While a factor of 5 . t the first two and appears

st st are a huge rang huge a are

. . e naturaless naturaless and r

V and no doubt many ible by deca ressive s a subset of s ght ght bu i s The found will take high . ly imp SSM hes hes by at lea lar s preserve a heavy squark goes up to 35 data driven era driven data made made po

i the M ill build on that tion

en , w h for c a n can fit any given theory to any given given any to theory given any fit can n t seemst tome we need tobu n be powerful allies in our relatio our in allies powerful be n ence is long term needing in s be i a

SUSY we have i a , direct direct searc LHC h - f mple to find as was once thought it would would it thought once was as find to mple tic i al al e s r rent searches for new phenomena a stops and gluinos are li

for example d our sci ene

, n g ng as as ng

11 i r limits from Run 1 and early Run 2 (preliminary). 2 Run early and 1 Runfrom limits r the physics to follow at 100 Te many many viable direc the type o ov The The number of preprints on the arxiv foll r t to the fact we are in a

fog might clear at any momentany at clear might fog

h for ). ). c en and showing a understa . At 100 TeV the re , and

10 of of physics beyond the model standard an example

ation of of ation miss id T ure and now the HL the now and ure E e Physics e search with 5 TeV igure

q ch for neutralino dark matter is s is dark matter chneutralino for SUSY / ruct searches n I. Shipsey

t - -- g jets+ t a Focus on specific signatures, simplified Focusspecificsignatures, models on guide optimisation MC regionsconstrain to control Data-drivenbackgrounds: multiple predictionsuncertainties and systematic backgrounddescriptions verify regions: Validation sensitivity! regions: Signal to underst ove ove the re s singlinos NMSSM U(1)’ U(1)’ r ● ● ● ● ● ● on tionspan ofthe press shortis we need their support as they ca they as support their need we Very broad set of SUSY broad set ofSUSY Very searchresults reported with2015+2016 data Justa couple of exampleshere ICHEP 2016 Standard ATLAS approach in many searches: ATLAS Standard SUSY Searches SUSY SUSY Searches SUSY les c N=1 er er tha c n GeV GeV (F en D Charlton / Birmingham – 8 August 2016, ICHEP Chicago ICHEP 2016, August 8 – / Birmingham Charlton D

i i t SUSY t e in point is the LHC which ment SUSY is not p not is SUSY ment lider re that MSSM ecember a is testam ons ons reported on dozens of diffe pMSSM theorem that “any competent theorcompetent“any that theorem V col V A cas s er er will imp he mo he ’ t . ast D ast l ay be heav Now the a the Now Dirac gauginos m Taking Taking natural SUSY as ent ent

”. ”. the LHC. With a full eluc s (Left) The SUSY framework

Still at at Still ). ). t n s both SUSY and n

. l a ATLAS SUSY Searches 95% CL lowe CL 95% Searches SUSY ATLAS e e road to SUSY is fogbound, but the the but fogbound, is SUSY to road e The The collaborati

uncem . The 100 Te gies r Th

V . e oth oth ATLAS and CMS revealed that their 2016 data do not confirm the previous hints of a di nno

set of facts of set relationship with the press so that they and decades over made with the public investment in the CERN infra B photon resonance at 750 a Redman confirm be of mod more that have not yet been thought of testable (Figure 9 generatio Te can discover SUSY part en Figure Figure 8 (Right) results. similar presented CMS A 100 TeV colld Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

kino kino GeV GeV

There There ht).

Run 2 2 Run . (rig IanShipsey might look look might LHC

electrowea 35 (25) and pp 30 14 TeV 100 TeV 7 arXiv:1102.0302 25 ation with a light gluino gluino light a with ation 6 14 TeV. of new scalars NLSP mass LSP mass 20 Heavy Squark Limits 5 N 15 mass [TeV] 4 Multi-Lepton Limits might be gauged, either 10 I 3 mass [TeV] 5 o dark matter 2

collider. h. 0 † 1 pp ed to speculate that evidence for SUSY, for evidence that speculate to ed pear in data recorded in 2016 in recorded data in pear h gluino ) squarks I

35 TeV, covering the entire range of 0

number of events events of number 40 (3 ab (3 ) I -1 ⇠ 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 ( 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 40 wino / bino c

collider. 1 2 H higgsino / bino wino / higgsino higgsino / wino 5 TeV, enough to eliminate their dangerous pp gluino gluino H

35 gluino m m × × m ers, probing × MadGraph5 v2: LO ⇠ ↵ 12 30 55 = 20 = 10 = 5 a set has been delivered as of summer2016 of as delivered been has set a squark squark squark m m m 100 TeV 14 TeV 25 ~10 TeV ~10 6 of the major advances obtained by going to a 100 TeV 100 a to going by obtained advances major the of

14 TeV 100 TeV typically a factor 10 in statistical power over Run 1 for 1 Runover power statistical in 10 factor a typically 20 collider stems from the reach for neutralin 100 TeV pp TeV 100 It is not far fetch far not is It pp 5

15 .

H squark mass [TeV] . Collider Limits 10 LHC dat LHC mass reach of new physics new of reach mass 4 uniquely associated with the Higgs. It - an important discovery could come at any time any come at could discovery important an 5 for a heavyafor squark produced associin e Physics e

[TeV] 5 ∼ χ 3 0 1 3 2 -1 m -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 the reach of the direct search of new physics particles by at least at physicsnewbyparticles ofsearch direct the ofreach the 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

σ → ) [pb] ) q g (pp

~ H ~ The supersymmetric implementations of neutral naturalness do not gen- 30 TeV. Finding these heavier scalars will be critical for a zeroth-order ? , and a quartic interaction with the Higgs 2 I disappearing tracks Some or all of theby global symmetries the acting SM on electroweak the interactions, or mirror interactions. There must be in association with a light gluino at the 100squarks TeV goes upmasses to for the an first-two incredible generation scalars of naturalerate SUSY. this large obliquethe top Higgs partners operator are atwith scalars like tree-level. six the states stop, In infrom but the total. the charged bottom simplest under We up: a cases, can mirror we imagine parametrize SU(3), that all there the is some interesting number possibilities stops and gluinos are light.plausibly At the be same time, heavier thecontribution first than to two generations electric should dipolethey moments. induce But a they logarithmicallygeneration cannot enhanced squarks get negative [50, too mass⇠ 51], heavy, for as and the so (light)understanding cannot third- be of pushed thesupersymmetry higher spectrum, breaking than which in at entangles aoutside most the fascinating the reach physics way. of of WhileThe the these flavor most LHC, scalars and powerful they are productiongluino will well and be channel first-two accessible is generation to the squarks, a associated as 100 production shown TeV collider. in of Fig. the 18. The reach for Figure 18: Cross section (left panel) and reach (right panel) for a heavy squark produced (Upper left) Reach ~ TeV ~ 1 A sketch of one one of sketch A . HC the end of 2018, of end the L

ment in ment 0 ) ) ~ H ~ W / / ~ B wino H ~ B collider will see, for the first time, a fundamentally new dynamical process 1 by 1 higgsino pp stop coan. - HC A high energy hadron collider is a QCD machine. Any new states with As the next exploration facility at the energy frontier, the 100 TeV A broad summary of the dark matter reaches we have discussed is given in mixed ( gluino coan. mixed ( squark coan. L even more for searches for more even non-observation at theextend LHC well beyond sets a bounds fewThis TeV on mass after reach the their LHC would mass, energy be increase substantially bounds to extended 13 that by the will 100 TeV collider. Figure 26:troweakino Summary cascades [73]. of colliders’ reach for neutralinoGeV, it dark will not matter probesaturating [68] the dark TeV and mass matter. range in By thatmass contrast, elec- is reach the most from natural jump for togo the thermally 100 LHC deep TeV roughly into extends thematter. this by LSP a territory, with factor a of great 5, potential and to thus5. discover allows WIMP us Other New dark to Physics Searches collider will lead us intothe completely projections new of territory. a Inup. variety this of We section, new show we the particles cross present andqualitative section phenomena estimates increases that with of respect could the to show observability the in LHC, and experiments provide at5.1. 100 New TeV. Color Resonances QCD interactions would be copiouslySome produced such via exotic quark and statesthe gluon have partons. been LHC systematically experiments classified have in been Ref. actively [76], searching and for them [77, 78]. The Summary Fig. 26. While the LHC can look for electroweak states up to a few hundred 100 TeV pp TeV 100 mprove i The Higgs must also have a dynamical property we have never seen for the self-interaction of an elementary particle excess excess in the number of diphoton events corresponding to a mass of 750 Figure 1: A sketch of two ofThe the 100 major TeV advances obtained by going to a 100 TeV will also improve the reach of theof direct 5. search of new physics particles by at least a factor excitement surrounding the proposal of abold 100 TeV leap into the completely uncharted new territory that it o other scalar particles we havesize seen close have to been their Compton obviouslybe radius. composite, more The with point-like Higgs than a is naturally not expected like on this, theoretical appearing grounds. to any of the other fundamental particles:with it other should particles, be but able also to interact withbasic not itself! of only Indeed, all self-interaction processes is allowed theforbid by most point-like quantum self-couplings field for theory, all but particlesonly spin but scratch and the the charge surface Higgs. of The this LHCcollider physics, we will but will be with able the to data unambiguously fromself-interaction see the and process, precisely 100 whose measure TeV the structure Higgs ismass deeply of related the to Higgs the itself. origin and At an even more fundamental level, much of the (Lower left) (Lower (Lowerright)

is An An O(100) fb O(100)

Composite figure from [2] and references therein. therein. references and [2] from figure Composite

. ing like the cartoon in Figure 11 2% of the complete LHC/ HLLHC/ complete the of 2% y reason to be optimistic that that optimistic be to reason y ~ Figure 9 Figure 100 TeV pp collider

igure 10 someth observed by ATLAS and CMS in 2015 (left) did not reap not did (left) 2015 ATLASCMS by and in observed promises: & measurements headlines the and 2 Run in found is model standard the beyond physics other some or F Only is ever pp collider collider pp 5. of factor a at a cascades Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

) – 3

“A the o φ

r ( type

f -

eutral eutral re are γ matrix matrix a series he , t IanShipsey A.Soni , due to the

hese modes hese the value of

– CKM k Times in in Times k . factories, see a virtual a

- . T . in

n presented s well s stitute in Switzerland in stitute d the B “Imagine if Fitch and

finalstates : ) 3 b an – - . The observation of n unitarity triangle angle angle triangle unitarity July 23, 2020 gies informs us of of us informs gies ly in the context of the discoverythecontexttheof in ly ires patterns of deviationsexistpatternsofto ires robing for CPV in charm with per ) ~ 2 10 CKM at at KEK in Japa p – flavour violation, which would also

quarks to probe new physics, LHCb, physics, new probe to quarks

rom LHC ecays to charm a charm to ecays π . semileptonic f + of of d requ

a few interesting discrepancies from e π standinginconsistencies to date for CP violation in the decaysof the violationinCP for date to 1 delivering in all important topics topics important all in delivering 1 - -

→ MeV ener MeV ) 0 ic B ic L searches for new particles and interactions, on (K system to

s B

y of beauty and top ept are long are na na and Belle l 13 decay at at decay -

there

here here e B decays to strange final states with dileptons SUSY 2036 SUSY into charged particles (Anikira et al., JETP 1962). At that r (remember: w

Two quotes capture this nice this capture quotes Two e Physics e before the discovery of Z of discovery the before cb periments periments reported ex before before the discover CP violation CP in the violation B irect discoverynewphysicsirectof er er ality violation in sem in violation ality reat steps forward in knowledge in forward steps reat . The GIM mechanism indicated the existence of charm, before of of g Geneva, Switzerland rocess results. While there are ation of V of ation The Other Half of the Universe Discovered The Other Half p n to - i , sitive searchsitive date to for charged lepton ) m . The discovery of CP violation and its accommodation in the univers µ

µ ome intriguing anomalies have emerged ter

determined by the inclusive and exclusiv and inclusive the by determined S e

e studies

. s à he MEG (Mu to E Gamma) experiment at the Paul Scherrer In Scherrer Paul the at experiment Gamma) E to (Mu MEG he ub s i Original cartoon from Hitoshi Murayama. Hitoshi from cartoon Original n may be emerging in ra

(B ( event event among 600 decays

r physics at the LHC a great success, with run with success, great a LHC the at physics r The quest for ind for quest The ]. The announcement of the discovery of SUSY at the LHC in the New Yor New the in LHC the at SUSY of discovery the of announcement The s of lepton of

prec mesons which, if detected, would allow researchers to probe CP violation in the up the in violation CP probe to researchers allow would detected, if which, mesons

. ter –

Intensity/precisionfrontier e the most sen ny intensity fronti werev evidence for the Z Z the for evidence werev and V and s i [3 π

a + cb er π Flavo M hint The The

Beijing Spectrometer (BES) Beijing Spectrometer at IHEP in Chi

→ o 0 L s uark sector. T sector. uark nd a pat both V both mille mille precision 12 Figure a al d the in used are L.Okun discov and from of of CP violation in the Kaon system Cronin had stopped at the 1% level, how much physics would have been missed” special search at Dubna was carried out by Okonov and his group. They did not K find a single stage the search was terminated by the administration of the lab. The group was unlucky.” be a clear signature of new physics. Using bottom and charm and bottom Using physics. new of signature clear a be the of precision and rare emerged. SMhave the beyond physics of signs no presently predictions, (SM) Model Standard precision. more for need a is There including new LHCb results on the most sensitivesearchmostincludingtheLHCb new onresults D neutral q reported mediator mediator at 80 GeV (W) discovery of charm required the third generation currents July, 2020. July, 1.4 frontier energy the before frontier intensity/precision the at up show can physics New beta Oridnary loops. quantum of reach mass Figure 11 Figure Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

tal the ub μμ

ence en

to and

K* am ub the only d → omparing omparing V

n IanShipsey 0 , c , B

and and ν D(*)l LHCb, BaBar BaBar LHCb, weak equival weak → . B permit permit new ways to ing for fu

µ the µ e) f enabling enabling tests of general that determinations. à s search cb hey are a gift and a window a and gift a are hey which which constitutes

And longstanding inconsistency In exclusive vs inclusive V . T . [Y. Sato, this conference] [PRL 113 (2014) 151601] ea level observables: (top left) (top observables:

- or or neutral atoms) are sensitive an lead to tests of sl+l cm at s

c ?? are are massive , … p experiments → factories - ν � l - l (*) + violation in: (top middl (top in: violation Cold Atoms Cold

I. Shipsey – 14 B→Kl -- the most copious particles in the Cosmos after Neutrinos Neutrinos

es es and new theoretical ideas . i ADMX) …and in

b and the B enable precision spectroscopy (atomic clocks) (atomic spectroscopy precision enable ICHEP 2016 - Hints of lepton universality violation in B→D Longstanding inconsistency in exclusive vs inclusive V inclusive vs exclusive in inconsistency Longstanding e Physics e CAPP, e: they they e: (bottomintheleft) dfferential rateof B (Right) physics beyond the Standard Model Standard the beyond physics . Neutrinos are nomalous behaviour in b in behaviour nomalous

- l from LHC

. experiments involve new thinking and new expertise they should be l clocks based on trapped ions ( ints of lepton universality in date from a variety of experiments including LHCb, BaBAr, Belle and Kl+

are versatil are → ards Relic Neutrinos (e.g. Tritium) (e.g. Neutrinos Relic ards 2 small But some intriguing anomalies have emerged q in B Axion searches ( searches Axion nucleons) muons, (electron, tests EDM precise Ultra forces) (new Gravity Precision Tow Foam Quantum Probing vs distribution and and distribution ’

5 observables 2

- P Also, Also, optica • • • • • q These These

LHCb data show a show data LHCb - "gbar" to test the equivalence of gravitational acceleration (little g) between matter and matter between g) (little acceleration gravitational of equivalence the test to "gbar" Universe, some examples include examples some Universe,

3.7 ??? ??? ’ , 5 determinations

Trapped ions ions Trapped μμ , made possible by new technolog b→sl+l

eutrinos eutrinos are immensely important

12 * le

the tory basedevidencetoryfor cb K Anomalous behaviour In N There There are a large range of smaller and table to The quest for indirect discovery of new physics requires patterns of deviations to exist

→ 0 104] (2016) 02 [JHEP B encouraged and supported andencouraged labora into the world of new physics electric andelectric magnetic tracks transitions variations in princip antimatter. redshift gravitational for height differences of only ~30 relativity. physics probe in the P h indicate data Belle and (bottommiddle) V and CLEO. Figure Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

s. of of s

e r MeV MeV

in the menon menon of order order of

eno the NOvA IanShipsey rich flavor also also received

. For all these of the order of of order the of – offer offer a

os. However, all three three all However, os.

, they eptogenesis 0.5.

a clear need for an influx

≠

2015 result, T2K observes an 23 that underlies maximal mixing As reported at ICHEP, however, however, ICHEP, at reported As remarkably smallremarkably in experiments conducted so far. soexperimentsconducted in θ ifferent neutrino states is states neutrino ifferent

. quantum interference ph sin2 There There is

–

eutrino program is making exceptional prog exceptional making is program .

t mixing of the second and third neutrino , the DayatheBayexperiment , China, Renoin xing xing ifferences areifferences

, and the posibilty of l 15 the program to turn indication into observation. Earth Sun distance Sun Earth confirm a reactor neutrino flux that is low compared low is that flux neutrino reactor a confirm

maximal mi maximal old old signal from the LSND experiment at Los Alamos - - nt long baseline long nt in the neutrino spectrum at an energy of around 5 utrino utrino data in 2016 than in e lower than would be expected if CP asymmetry is conserved is asymmetry CP if expected be would than lower . This is the first robust indication of CP Violation beautiful beautiful example of a

year

. e Physics e evidence for a sterile n sterile a for evidence

A disfavour the idea tha idea the A disfavour 4σ ν hey hey are favored by the Nobel Committee hooz in France France in hooz , t that the mass splittings between the d the between splittings mass the that

the results presented at ICHEP show that neutrino physics is entering a hypothesised particles that do that via SMnot interact particles hypothesised forces

– of sterile neutrinos. Interestingly neutrinos. sterile of preference for non for preference indicates hese fundamental particle mass d mass particle fundamental hese T and Double C Double and

sitivity andmaturity sitivity Combining Combining the T2K, Nova and SuperK experiments in a global fit CP Violation

onnections onnections to very high mass scales ). hey hey delight poets t t is mandatory to study them in exquisite detail , c

antineutrino appearance rate rate appearance antineutrino 3 With nearly twice the antine 13 , Data from T2K currently favour the idea of CP violation in the lepton sector, which is Neutrino Neutrino Oscillations are a

1 terile neutrinos S periments periments also confirm an excess ults (right) show a a show (right) ults ctron ctron ex igure of of compared to predictions shedding doubt on the modelling. National Laboratory, Laboratory, National not do Fermilab MINOS+ at and Antarctica IceCUBEin from results new and data cosmological existence the confirm KoreaSouthin neutrin sterile with mixing from arise could which modelling, latest the with (left). (left). With data accumulated until May 2016, representing 16% of its planned total, res new attention in Chicago. The 20 Figure Figure ele conservation conservation is excluded at 2 sigma leptonic sector and the community is building one one of the conditions required for the observed universe, while data dominance from NO of matter over antimatter in the flavours is maximal, representing a test of (F a new symmetry These experiments indicate experiments These less. or eV 0.03 curr The energies. excitation molecular conclusive yet not While sen of era new structure reasonsi the to up meters from varying baseline a with Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision Photons PoS(ICHEP2016)037

- - f e at at l We We dge

beta beta with with , and - citing citing < 2 eV,

owle matrix matrix e

KATRIN KATRIN

r and on

n 100 meV, sensitivity sensitivity . IanShipsey y difficult - PMNS tonne sca What comes comes What bl

nt kn nt e Then Then >~50

and measure the

ing and ex e. . is only possible i s b Booster neutrino neutrino Booster b e

a r the PMNSthe

il u neutrino experiments experiments neutrino < 0.23 eV (95% CL) - An extensive range of range An extensive

experiments will push i m

ities were presented at eutrinoless eutrinoless double surpri v m n which

ultiple ultiple confirmations Fer measures measures that mass very expos Σ siti produce very accurate CKM accurate very produce we we can expect matrix matrix elements leading to

the mass. sen These These are incredi

decay origin origin of the CKM, se delta with high precision.

a t both reactor reactor both

corresponds corresponds to pha makes it plausible. plausible. it makes

There There are m with a long long a with

ady, experiment Majorana Majorana CP phases must be non e and their understa lanck scale with inflation, there is a broad a is there inflation, with scale lanck years

ribed Dirac Dirac

on a firmer footing. s

c The The next generation t 26 s

ave very accurate data on flavo program using the the using program ct ct 8

From From cosmology: the

erarchy

~10 Super Belle/ LHCb Belle/ Super ong evidence for neutrino mass neutrino for ong evidence . Tritium experiments have reached m theweak interaction 1956in 16 t/yr! 1/2 t are marked by rapid, ery accurate measurements of measurements accurate ery Proje T en are almost r almost are

enario de enario further into the future

s 0.2 0.2 eV. measure measure the eutrinoless eutrinoless double be <

hat hat would be a tremendous discovery, comparable to the ~1 ~1 ev e

n unfolding unfolding and and probing the P the probing and

effort effort ensues to

So So now we h , ment calculations ment ect

discovery discovery scenario might look like: a half life e h the normal hi normal the h e Physics e

c : a Therefore, Therefore, it is timely and compelling to embark on a renewed understanding understanding of the fundamental leptogenesis model that explains the baryon asymmetry.baryon the explains that model leptogenesis a lower limit on the mass of the lightest eigenstat Combining Combining all data the

know but the sc the but know y region cosmic frontier tha

KATRIN KATRIN m dark energy dark

next next generation of experiments.

of of the important experimen

come online and ajor ajor theory erve erve neutrinoless double beta decay.

hallenging e a big version of rarch na. The existence of a Majorana neutrino will necessarily imply that lepton lepton that imply necessarily will neutrino Majorana a of existence The na. K the - e < 0.01 eV. , e in on a on in e

at at the we we have i A m h with ,

nuclear nuclear matrix el erile neutrino experiment neutrino erile c m will begin to re to begin will

t a We do not do We

. isotope one can exp in both hierarchies (NH favored) A wealth or particle physics using the whole universe as our laboratory our as universe whole the using physics particle or wealth A Σ K and DUNE? The answer is v is answer The DUNE? and K nt short baseline neutrino oscillation neutrino baseline short nt

- methods and unprecedented accuracies (few %) on accuracies and methods unprecedented . a b

s that b of of t n the next decade there are good to prospects via reach, a probes, multiple at at an intensity frontier yper inverted hi To To see how c Will that Will lead that to an observed observed in

osmological measurements then find str find then measurements osmological

is not a conserved quantity. T

ents ents ect ect to re

DUNE/Hyper C is

From dark matter to matter dark From Turning to the quest to obsverve n ri The cosmic frontier cosmic The e then able to hom to able then m.

th 100kg 5 xperiments, xperiments, and som 1. range of activites devleopmen a neutrino factory. While this work in work this While factory. neutrino a matrix elements determinations. masses. matrices? mass well. well. sum of the zero! masses. are H beyond Here Here is wh decay multiple nuclei breakthrough degenerate region observes this mass ICHEP. wi into the exp and exp today, but i at the level of discovery quest to obs e the neutrino is Majoraneutrinotheis number by conserved not was parity that demonstration of the neutrino mixing parameters provides a firm prediction for parameter m the range of values of the next generation s generation next import an and bea Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision theorists to place PoS(ICHEP2016)037

e d l II in ning ning ce is scale - - nt ro nt metric metric (right). Further Further a

. rt There are are There (positron,

IanShipsey … wide - the discovery

. parameter spa parameter ntimatter a od record of lear decay decay in our galactic will be needed (Figure (Figure needed be will , and should approach o

ntideuterons and the demonstration of

a g , a , matter candidates and their their and candidates matter

es playing an impo an playing es - i matter annihilation or decay in in decay or annihilation matter ave the Cerenkov Telescope Array - e “dark sector” made up of dark t/currnet experiments have been ntiprotons en Occhialini) other novelties novelties other

, a , uncertainit (muon,Anderson, 1936)

lies with LAT now excludes WIMP masses up to Dark Dark matter implications require precise A substantial region of of region A substantial - ude the discovery of of discovery the ude

. l c However However we h in eutrinos

s eneration , n , 17 In indirect dark matter searches with photons there photons with searches matter dark indirect In g

The The future .

Future Future prospects are the LZ line th astrophysical th hotons

example

econd Lattes, Lattes, Powell, and ). : energy particles from dark from particles energy

s - ark ark matter may pair annihilate or

up to ~400 GeV 2001). 2001). Important rec - eld wi eld , however. , Since Since 2010, and electron positron fluxes have been measure igh cs cs information. , left e Physics e

1947 4 energy p energy 1 - ugh fi ugh o t igure , high , romcosmosthe Since Since 2010, sensitivity improved by ~100 (for m ~ 100 GeV) f nt nt with background expectations. 3 orders of magnitude expected by a suite of experiments world experiments of suite a by expected magnitude of orders 3 - LAT and AMS. ositrons - markable markable precision p

), the discovery), ofthe physics physics

ready they exclude a substantial fraction of the parameter space of supersym e apid apid improvements in recent years, Fermi l s to cover. It is a is It cover. to s c

The LUX and PandaX experiments saw no signals of dark of no signals saw LUXexperiments The PandaX and i n (“Yukawa” particles,

t rino floor” at which time directional detection and detection directional time which at floor” rino r , which will extend the reach by two orders in mass up to masses ~ 10 TeV Dark matter dominates the matter content of the universe, but its identity is still a mystery. mystery. a still is identity its but universe, the of content matter the dominates matter Dark Turning Turning to indirect detection d

matter candidates matter (F candidates -

by AMS with re fluxes ray cosmic of determinations have been r ~100 GeV for certain channels annihilation (CTA) about pa about 1932 Anderson, of the pio neutrino mass and mixing (1998 PAMELA, Fermi to neighborhood front many in the extraction of partcile physi 14 Figure results were consiste now excluded (left). improvements2 by

sensitivity: sensitivity: the latest examples reported at ICHEP came from LUX in the US and PandaX and al China, dark “neut the right). 14, Indeed, some theorists speculate about the existence of an entir photons and multiple species of dark matter. Numerous approaches are being pursued to detect and are complemented these by at the LHC, searches dark directly, matter of surveys large h observe to attemptsand structure or around our Galaxy. Regarding direct detection, experiments are advancing steadily in Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision

PoS(ICHEP2016)037

er er t riven

is d is

IanShipsey years years after on acoustic

y using multiple using k energy at late energy nent nent dark mat r

a o : The latter latter The with with leptons is too

e from satellites like

the rate of change wit ter

a rms of inverse precision d missing missing d nd other quantities. other nd is the small orange ellipse. Tim Tait Tim

driven driven by d a two comp to interact

s an s re formation re tion c e , and the ground based CMB surveys s n here in te

- structu dark matter mass < 400 GeV 400 < mass matter dark

w s s shapes the CMB at 300,000 ow under construction and DESI, and the the and DESI, and construction under ow devleoped by devleoped IRD

e utrino masses a masses utrino

m t excess of jet t look like for seed of of Type 1a supernovae and bar n is sho

s en in an upgraded ADMXupgradedan in en rly ti 18 nt a e of the ne the of As the survey field matures detailed comparisons comparisons detailed matures field survey the As t excess of leptons with missing energy is se uture uture which is in turn

io has been n ine migh em .

r el to Xenon 1T

m tion at e decouple, and and decouple,

raylinecoming from the galatic cen

fla a n e Physics e WFIRST m measu o . The scenar

r y see a signifca asee

s signific a doseenot s t t sit ressure to the energy denisty) compared to w en ter discovery ti t m xperimen V and its comparison to stage IV (the ratio of p a dark ma

ible signal of axion conversion

when matter and photons and matter when 0 stage based Euclid and proposed proposed and Euclid based -

Cosmic Cosmic Surveys have been engines for science over the past several decades as the era of Turning Turning to cosmic surveys, i , and by neutrinos which have a significant impact on the growth of structure at small scales.small at structure ofgrowth the onimpact significant a havewhichneutrinos by and , lations in the spatial distribution of galaxies. The predicted precision of LSST of precisionpredicted The galaxies. of distribution spatial the in lations l i normalized to today for dark energy, the sum the energy, dark for today to normalized Figure Figure 15 (Left) current knowledge (grey, blue and salmon colored of ellipses) the dark energy w parameter time of dark energy derived f osc probes including the measurement of cosmic shear via weak lensing (Right) space precsion precsion cosmology has dawned. The CMB surveys have grown in LiteB proposed the scop future the in and Planck to WMAP find their most mature expression in the proposed CMB Stage IV mission. Optical surveys have likewisegrownscope infrom SDSS, DESLSSTto to n bang big the by dark matter producing the growth of str times 2019: Neutrinos are seen coming from the sun by IceCube by sun the from coming seen are Neutrinos 2019: TwoLHC e 2019: poss A 2020: 2030?: Observation at a Higgs factory indicates the cross large to satisfy the relic den made up of WIMPS and axions and WIMPS of up made a with consistent event of handful a sees 1T Xenon 2017: gamm faint a HESSobserves 2017: TwoLHC experi 2018: signal similar a SuperCDMS sees 2018: Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision Here is what PoS(ICHEP2016)037

re We We

veys veys . GeV LSST LSST

energy scaled

16 effective effective f the two is needed is confirmed 10 IanShipsey w structu the sky and

IVmissions

is the brightness in in brightness . . In principle,In.

) ho n ment ment optical sur optical ,

with with om n have have high costs r

viro heory heory of know of T

clusters clusters or through the (Figure16

sigma

- ts 6 nflation scale scale nflation transformsituationthis ; i cosmologists and have nicely nicely have and cosmologists

nified nified s complementary to other future driven driven revolution is to explain logies - U o Even after the stage stage the after Even sure over 24 orders of magnitude of orders 24 over sure

hich hich is known to about 10%) and ea of of PNG, constraining

gaussianity (PNG) gaussianity rand

5 at 20 at 5 and is power to to power -

0.0

nt knowledge does not constrain it. it. constrain not does knowledge nt ull ull G =

A mulitdisciplinary en mulitdisciplinary A e m of techn of m

Majorana neutrinos Majorana modes . r u

GeV - are needed. are

r size as a function of distance distribution of objec of distribution

ics 15 to a f s

t or time by counting thecosmic microwave background y ratio we detect & m & detect we 19

, Many Many experiments are large and

eads driven revolution is to discover new things that have have that things new discover to is revolution driven l -

y detected detected y of primordial non primordial of shows the the impact of LSST (a stage IV dark

vast vast range of types

s r/scalar a This This o of US particle physicists and and physicists particle US of

. In our field our In saw10of scale of these missions missions these of e Physics e - knowledge knowledge of dark energy (w enabler. enabler. “New directions in science are launched by new tools

beta deca beta rumentationtheR&Dhas

- We use a rich spect rich a use We

Figure Figure 15 the tens g multiple complementary probes will directly address the physics physics the address directly will probes complementary multiple g See example of what a discovery scenario might look like at the cosmic the at like look might scenario discovery a what of example

n Inst function of redshif . discovers proton decay decay proton discovers

Information on dark energy can be gleaned using both using gleaned be can energy dark on Information

great great

. ter of objects of know usi K

e - as as a

e scoping of detectors and their capabilities to the detriment of physics reach less double , DESI/LSST/Euclid measure neutrino masses to - diam -

rs CMB experiments find hint of B of hint find experiments CMB 4

r e Freeman Dyson. Dyson. Freeman S4 confirms confirms S4 S erous erous probes of dark the energy: a 3

- - in a recent report from which Figure 15 (right) is taken. – ul t of weak lensing : DES finds hint of large neutrino mass sum : Stage : CMB n are numare sets sets and probes have the revolutionary potential to lead to the reconciliation o he he ang e : ex: Euclid/DESI etc. all t scale structure and data from surveyingfrom data and structure scale

- , an important contribution to measuring dark energy

the CMSB to cosmic rays. Our instrumentation represents both a towering achievement, and, in some cases, a in and, some cases, achievement, a both towering represents Our instrumentation Instrumentation is the 2035: DUNE/Hyper 2035: 2045: 21 cm experiments detect inflation drove that Lagrangian decay proton and neutrinos, inflation, for predictions 2023: Neutrino 2023: 2025 structure, mass Neutrino hint find LSST/DESI/Euclid 2026: CMB 2028: Here is one hypothetical hypothetical one is Here 2018 2020 The The

InstrumentationtheGreat Enabler

ed to develop new technologies to find new ph new find to technologies new develop to ed 6 om r to matchavailableto resources. ne to be explained” be to f up version of techniques used in the past. resulting in major de 1. much more often than by new The concepts. effect of a concept tool a of effect The ways. new in things old frontier: the rate of changedarkenergyofrateof withthe time where curr makes missions have met their obejectives there will still be much more information to extract f activity community a Visions Cosmic summarised this the sky grows in the univ measurm current the to compared mission) of inflation and dark energy dark and inflation of large of these data relativity. general and mechanics quantum physics of edifices great Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision sets data richer much with PoS(ICHEP2016)037

- d

to for rch , and elp elp creating creating

stry lopments ith gains. formative IanShipsey sensors and h and

Technology Technology , can measure

deve we we nly nly some scalings oncept oncept support for i a TES SiPM HPGe Power trategies for resea rigger & DAQ: R&D entrepreneurs , s as as ademia and indu

ntrepreneurship and start and ntrepreneurship potentially potentially trans e ers ers to realizing industrial ac w. w. Cert , a

–

ASIC GEM WbLS develop nnovation n and calorimetry Phototubes i community let’s help them find it. themfind help communitylet’s to

as as well. Developments in exascale : c

We We need proof of c dimensions but if we opened the fourth fourth the opened we if but dimensions d

of of the most promising areas is CMOS

low mass, potentially rad hardpotentiallyrad mass, low attended session at ICHEP on ICHEP at session attended e

- Technologies RPC ution ution of 30 ps t are the best models to bring Bubbles l the norm up to no powerful powerful and flexible intelligent trigger tools Germanium peakers peakers from academia, laboratories, industry

Noble Gases

s I. Shipsey -- 20 Wha and low cost,low talent from our . sity sity frontier. In the area of T

, with ICHEP 2016 3D Si power reduction, to data storage and bandw We had a well a had We inten er disciplines involving er both disciplines combintaion of sili have have been

Materials hom go into industry, industry, into go hom . MicroMegas Noble Liquids th a we measure in three in measure we Today at the LHC the increased luminosity means increase means luminosity increased the LHC the at Today

- , offering, . . Presentations covered eed for international collaborations and networksand collaborations international for eed Industry as mediator? of w of e Physics e

use use

a TPC Calor c . CCD How How can we lower the current barri LAPPD LAr be many

, Imag ?

due to the spectacular gains of the micorelectronic and telecomuncations telecomuncations and micorelectronic the of gains spectacular the to due ndustry ndustry perspectives d strengthened d ndustry is looking for looking is ndustry I . There is a Rich Spectrum of

ason to be optimistic that instrumentation will continue to be a great enabler enabler great a be to continue will instrumentation that optimistic be to ason . Ckov DAQ - and i O

acerbated acerbated A 2 Crystals Silicon HS H HEP HEP as mediator?

is ex is pplications (medicine, aerospace, material science etc.) science material aerospace, (medicine, pplications

, a , ch A selection of the detection technologies used in particle physics. (Original figure figure (Original physics. particle in used technologies detection the of selection A Trigger Trigger and DAQ are likely to be transforme

. ing times of less than two years There is good re good is There tries from transistor count, ADC ion nsion nsion through precision timing uccess uccess stories t must be enhanced an enhanced be must s e a science. Thsi is in part in is Thsi science. , m pin offs and startups and offs pin heterogeneous heterogeneous and neuromorphc computing, Link Technologies are all promising. all are Technologies Link whi pileup, di the time of neutral energy in the event with a reso situ Doubl will stop, but new approaches will come on line. On calorimetry and tracking for sensors high energy pp and ee and colliders the in Associative Memories, FPGAs, GPUs, CPUs, Communications Industry Architectures and Figure 16 Figure fromMarcel Demarteau.) of indus

from HEP to the market opportunities? technologies maturing field our from people young s this Applications and Industrial Opportunities and intergovernmental institutions laboratories up Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision o with partners physics particle where PoS(ICHEP2016)037

at at ity mic mic area area Rencontres de Blois 2016 - u can (left), (left),

60 GHz60 ent IanShipsey ut ut yo the cos m

e , b at

r consumption r at the LHC LO QCD 3 p.24 n is detection critical lahas built a lines: new ideas and at N article article theory has been search for dark matter. H arkable achiev arkable three-loop master integrals, phase-space integrals interference diagrams, the main main ) ) ) → m 3 5 7

240mW powe 240mW hysics hysics cable plants are (still) Daniel de Florian , (10 (10 (10 gg 2016, 2016, new ideas for the ident O O O ireless technology is ubiquitous implications on physics

ntaneous ntaneous luminosity to maximsie w

changer" with significant impact in - high high quantum efficiency within an

particle particle p Additive manufacturing has ushered in a a in ushered has manufacturing Additive immediate only collider process known to such highoutstanding orders complexity: in QCD ✦ ✦ ✦ being being developed such as 3 D printing th ¨

ager signal times. The development of large of development The times. signal s 4.5Gbps @1m 4.5Gbps Richard Brenner at Upsa at Brenner Richard start. start.

Barbara J

21 I. Shipsey

-- would be a be "game would tion at N3LO has been a re a beenN3LOhas at tion e question of cables: c promising e

n dvancing dvancing rapidly along two

ICHEP 2016 e Physics e e of wavelengths and wavelengths of e ray spectroscopy and photon science. Photo . There are technique - ; this is a −15 , indispensable, in contrast in sensitive window with the following features: features: following the with as as well

involved (right).

a wide rang wide a ms a S and CMS detectors are modern day cathedrals but p r nt nt for particle physics but we have not learnt how to use them yet dark dark matter and naturalness, and more precise calculations of SM processes that g A of of the world

edrals edrals too. Theory is L rta or or di Calculating the Higgs cross s cross Higgs the Calculating

mpo Bit Error Rate < 4x10 < Rate Error Bit of the the of

The The AT Moving Moving to the seemingly munda

Quantum sensors enable the study of the early universe and

matter annihilation, matter in annihilation, addition to motivating a new experimental programme looking for - Theorists build cathedrals too! cathedrals build Theorists , for most

Figure 17 Figure some of dark matter have had implications for LHC searches and for attempts to observe astrophysical astrophysical observe to attempts for and LHC searches for implications had have matter dark of dark photons. dark 1.7 building cath approaches f are relevant for ongoing experiments. As emphasised at ICHEP may may be i of Secretary U.S. by driven been has and drives, it and Cobra) Shelby 3D (a alreaday car a make Moniz. Ernie Energy and cables? of instead wireles use we Can ubiquitous. system readout wireless anda new era of opportunity and ubiquitous over ubiquitous and devices, that are radiopure, with cryogenic stability and appropriate wavelength physics. energy high of outside areas phyiscs, and machine learning will be ubiquitous. be will learning machine and phyiscs, Transition edge sensors and kinetic inductance detectors have broad applications and intensity frontiers and in x Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision will enable low thresholds triggers to exploit increased insta PoS(ICHEP2016)037

, , - - he he and and

ILC may may of of a

. T .

– he he MEXT

tical that gram for i necessary o IanShipsey the sciencethe mplar , an energy rom , as well as /top factory at dielectrics exe

on f on this is rder corrections

, o si Baseline Baseline Neutrino >100 >100 MeV/m, and - was presented was

- quark quark production is ci

- g e amount of political elements

Increased emphasis es es as the leading . - atrix (LWFA) driven wakefield gradients to

operation - to future facilities,future to - towards realisation

le physics community beome or rator R&D to make the FCC and

beyond beyond the standard model next c

e - . i elerator elerator scientists nal co nal theoretical calculations with higher to

ers ers with - , the Compactthe , Linear Collider (CLIC) is now the number one priority of the

O(1 O(1 GeV/m) hh

e part , which are critical for understanding the - ady and awaiting a de a awaiting and ady ntal ntal precision on top f next - collid s we maintain space in our pr

17) particularly at the LHC and, soon, at t at soon, LHCand, the at particularly to

- Acceleration using Acceleration plasmas or LHC at CERN serv –

TeV based collider based - 22 - the is shovel re shovel is gradients gradients o e reality will require an immens

30 year horizon, starting with a Higgs

multi -

(see Figure plasma

Wakefield com next next generation of acc for a

: . In. addition, recent lattice QCD calculations play a key role the d e Physics e e effective The The LHC’s experime

c particle particle beam (PWFA) and laser

. u

rain d t o LHC, or or LHC, (ILC) in Japan in (ILC) today and in fact the entir ing costs r - . It will require advances in accel

global global endeavor; parameters parameters such as the CKM mixing m e Both where where effects of new phenomena

c a . he national and regional physics communties and in the decision making making decision the in and communties physics regional and national he n possible stepping stone to FCC to stone stepping possible e a operat Positron Positron Collider (CEPC) in China

– as as well i

in 3 stages over a 20

the Future Circular Collider (FCC) at CERN, the Lon thought to offer factory in Japan

cceleration starting to be p be to starting

are capitaland capitaland

that the audi uncertainties uncertainties to

There There have also been tremendous developments in aser aser a to these be like mahines Enabling Many ideas are being developed being are Many ideas Particle Particle physics is rtant o Accelerator Frontier Accelerator

grade of the LHC the of grade irect l experiments at small and medium scale they play a crtical role in our field and its progress. It is imp t in engagedvery remain future. bright a ensure to process support and funding cr is It detectors. of cost the R&Dlower to detector in advances and affordable variants at the same time we plan the large scale facilitie d approaches support shoud be provdied to for our community to be able realise the aspirations of building next generation machines HECEPC FCC,or CLIC, or around 380 GeV, Hyper the and US, the in (DUNE) Experiment Neutrino Underground Deep and (LBNF) Facility Japan. in experiment neutrino K with lower International Linear Collider Linear International the Circular Electron Chinese partcile phtysics community which is an imporatnt step up foresees realisation 1.8 devoted session a At project. science international large successful internatio require that projects new of status current and case and these are these and in extracting fundamental reducing emerge. conclusively order order QCD and corrections electroweak physics new for searching when SMbackgrounds SuperKEKB B now reaching the point where theory requires next Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision PoS(ICHEP2016)037

of of ve ve our our

ntense ntense st st talent licit and specially ist! uture uture and IanShipsey ic s y which to further to further which

both both exp room only, with

- – Participate Participate fully in

. n were the subject oordination that will be be will that oordination c

to probe the nature of dark re happening in other fields be a particle ph particle a be

ts progress will continue, i continue, will progress ts e public fnding and we must stri time to Maintain the high level of interaction interaction of level high the Maintain . ATLAS collaboration, and the American American the and collaboration, ATLAS ous ous program provide provide a variety of ways to look at the

to receiv now and in the future with

t we want to pursue must compete favorably e g ambit altering altering advances a in the agencies, in Congress, and in academia.

e CMB of of the community must endeavor to continue to - l

23 is important to pursue to governments, and to d an Continue Continue to reach out to our community; e .

term strategy with a compelling vision for the f - It It is a privi ot particle physicists, and may not be physicists at all. To do To all. at physicists be not may and physicists, particle ot . e Physics e The The leadership

ientific opportunities d of particle physics. Diversity and inclusio

of of sc y who are n are who y ur science ur is enough science compelling to compete for the favorably be There has never been a more exciting exciting more a been never has There have have identified compelling opportunities at all scales

attended sessions at ICHEP 2016 concerned professional issues critical to a to critical issues professional concerned 2016 ICHEP at sessions attended ies on all the playing fields: - eve o ams, and SuperKEKB, The compelling opportunities tha opportunities The compelling . I would like to thank, on behalf of all of the speakers and attendees at ICHEP

Kee Kim and her team for a remarkable and memorable conference in the great City City great the in conference memorable and remarkable a for team her and Kim Kee ark ark energy and to futher study the

representedbackgrounds [4]. international collaboration and how harassment and discrimination in scientific - that need to be overcome in the science community. Speakers described a number of

s in the academ the in s – Finally, Finally, ne of the well the of ne here here is a vast array A healthy A program healthy needs a long

T Our Our community

We must explain why physics particle We must beli must We O

Summary Celebrate our diversity our Celebrate

m under m 2016, Young 2016, expectations, neutrino physics has progressed dramatically, and i and dramatically, progressed has physics neutrino expectations, kaon and muon be matter and d scales. all on universe develop structures that will maintain the sense of community and global and community of sense the maintain will that structures develop aspirations our achieve to needed explore the smallest and largest structures in the universe. The LHC is performing beyond the national and global planning processes to younger colleagues, give them roles; they are the future between the different parts of our community across all of our and specialties all of our regions. voice. one with field one are We colleague this we must see our science as compelling, and we need to convince others it is compelling as well. futurescientific achievements. This whatis our fieldhas produced. such as biology and energy research to be worthy of it opportunit other with fro 2.0 in a world where transformational and paradigm supportive but candid discussion of the deep divides, harassment, and biases implicit positive initiatives, including the Early Career, Gender and Diversity office the established in by Diversity the on Group Study the collaboration, LHCb Physical Society’s “Bridge Program” to increase the number of physics PhDs among students successful future for the fiel parallel sessions, discussions and posters, with themes such as communication, inclusion and respect in communities create barriers to access. The sessions were mostly standing Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision 1.9 PoS(ICHEP2016)037

, , Tim Tim Artur Artur

: IanShipsey ars ars at ICHEP

ph] - and material from Andre De Gouvea, Marcel Marcel Gouvea, De Andre Tao Wang, Physics Physics Wang, Tao -

. wicz, Dave Wark, Guy Wilkinson Guy Wark, Dave wicz, ph] - Benefit Analysis of the Large Hadron Hadron Large the of Analysis Benefit - Persis Drell, Drell, Persis Cost ll, e Particle physics under the spotlight in Chicago in spotlight the under physics Particle , arXiV 1511.06495v1 [hep

m converstaions with 24

Fabiola Gianotti, Fabiola Marat Gianotti, Tim Gautaulin, Gershon, Saul

Chris Damer Chris Emanuela Sirtori, Sirtori, Emanuela Proton Collider Proton - d e Physics e an benefitted benefitted fro

nd Katie Yurkewicz Yurkewicz Katie nd

. Boaz Boaz Klima, Rocky Kolb, Jesse Liu, Hitoshi Murayama, Dan arXiv:1507.05638[physics.soc , Tony Tyson, Lucianne Walko LucianneTyson, Tony ,

, en oletto, Themis oletto, Bowcock, Joel Butler, Jim Brau, Bill Brinkman, Chip k Bill Bill Barletta, Alan Barr, Steve Biller, Ed Blucher, Oliver Buchmueller, , Tao Han, Michelangelo Mangano, and Lian don, Al Goshaw, Nick Hadley, Joanne Hewett, Joe Incandela, Steve Kahn, Kahn, Steve Incandela, Joe Hewett, Joanne Hadley, Nick Goshaw, Al don, many more many

Joe Lyk A. Soni and L. Okun were brought to my attention by Tim Gershon. Tim by attention my to brought were Okun L. and Soni A. Hamed and -

ani s

Kee Kim, Joe Lykken a Lykken Joe Kim, Kee - Phil Phil Allport, Kee Kee Kim, - n preparing for this talk I Mark Trodden, Mike Tutts Mike Trodden, Mark I CERN Courier, October, 2016 October, Courier, CERN Nima Ark Nima Proton TeV 100 a of Opportunities quote The Young Massimo Florio, Stefano Forte, Forte, Stefano Florio, Massimo beyond and 2025 to Collider

eferences [2] [3] [4] [1] Katie Yurkewicz Katie R Demarteau, Jonathan Feng, Brian Foster, Brian Feng, Jonathan Demarteau, Gor Howard Gonzalez, Young Spitz, Jo Seryi, Andrei Pripstein, Moishe Pauss, Felicitas Mangano, Michelangelo Marlow, Tait, Apreysan, Phil Bort Burrows, Daniela Conrad, Janet Cavanaugh, Rick Brock, to explore. An update on what you have found in the ocean will be given in two ye Seoul. in 2018 Acknowledgment Vision and Outlook: Future of Particl of Future Outlook: and Vision of Chicago! What we know is a droplet what we don’t know is an ocean. The ocean is for you