DOCSLIB.ORG

A285 Chichester to Petworth Safer Roads Investment Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A285 Chichester to Petworth Safer Roads Investment Plan Cabinet Member for Highways & Infrastructure Ref No: HI21 (17/18) November 2017 Key Decision: A285 Chichester to Petworth Safer Roads Investment Part I Plan Report by Executive Director Economy, Electoral Infrastructure and Environment and Director of Divisions: Highways & Transport Petworth, Fernhurst, Chichester North Summary Highways and Transport have been successful in bidding for additional funds from the Department for Transport to deliver the A285 Chichester to Petworth Safer Roads Investment Plan. In order to deliver this scheme these funds need to be added to the existing scheme funding in the capital programme and Highways and Transport require the authority to enter into a contracting relationship with a suitable delivery partner via the County Council’s existing framework arrangements. Recommendations The Cabinet Member for Highways and Infrastructure: i. Invites the Cabinet Member for Finance and Resources to add the £1.532m second Department of Transport grant to the existing allocation in the 2018/19 and 2019/20 Capital Programmes ii. Gives approval for the procurement to deliver the scheme to go to competitive tender under Lot 2 of the County Council’s Highways & Transport Frameworks 2016 as detailed in the report. iii. Delegates authority to make the decision to award the contract to the Executive Director Economy, Infrastructure and Environment following completion of the tender approval process 1. Background and Context 1.1 The A285 is a single carriageway rural route and is one of the few that runs north-south through the South Downs National Park linking the A27 with the A272 in the western part of the county. It passes through the villages of Halnaker and Duncton before reaching Petworth to the north. It is identified as Britain’s persistently highest risk road by the Road Safety Foundation 2016 EuroRAP report. 1.2 The route is 12 miles (19 km) long and currently has a EuroRAP risk rating of 199.6 fatal or serious injury (FSI) crashes per billion kilometres travelled. 96% of the deaths and serious injuries were to vehicle occupants and motorcyclists. The FSI rate to vehicle occupants on the Risk Mapping scale is medium-high risk. The addition of motorcyclists doubles the measured risk of death and injury. Together this gives the road the label of high risk and puts it at the top of “Britain’s persistently higher risk roads (Table 2 - 2009-11 & 2012-14)” in the 2016 EuroRAP report. 1.3 An international system that helps define the inherent risk of a road has been developed; similar to the way that Euro NCAP provides consumer information on the safety of new cars, it uses a star rating system. 1.4 Star Ratings are based on road inspection data and provide a simple and objective measure of the level of safety ‘built-in’ to the road for vehicle occupants, motorcyclists, bicyclists and pedestrians. 5-star roads are the safest while 1-star roads are the least safe. Inspection work undertaken by the Road Safety Foundation in December 2016 showed that 85% of the A285 rates 1 and 2-star for vehicle occupants and motorcyclists. 1.5 The 2016 EuroRAP publication indicated that the risk increased by 35% between 2009-11 and 2012-14. This was despite the implementation of a number of low cost safety measures. While these improvements had a positive impact on casualty figures; in 2015 the number of fatal or serious accidents per year dropped to only one incident; during 2016 casualties rose again to seven FSI accidents including 3 fatalities. This recent increase in casualties serves to underline the need to bring about sustainable safety improvements by upgrading the route quality and consistency to 2 and 3 stars. 1.6 West Sussex County Council has been successful in developing two bids to the Department for Transport’s (DfT) Safer Roads Fund to introduce a road safety scheme based on a series of counter measures informed by the assessment of the route by the Road Safety Foundation. The interventions are intended to improve the quality of the route by raising the star rating of the A285 to a minimum of 2 stars and to achieve 3 stars where possible saving an estimated 54 FSI casualties over 20 years. 1.7 Initial feasibility has been undertaken drawing on the countermeasures suggested by the Road Safety Foundations Safer Road Investment Programme. These formed the basis of the bids to the DfT. The proposals consist of the construction of a hardened carriageway edge strip (haunching) of minimum 0.5metre width for approximately 12 kilometres. This will be supplemented by a raised profile carriageway edge line to Traffic Signs Regulations & General Directions: 2016 Diagram 1012.3, which will be applied outside of the 30mph speed limit lengths providing running lanes of 3.25metres constant width where a standard centre line marking is present and 3.15metres where a double white line system is in place. 1.8 It is intended that the project will be processed under the WSCC Highways & Transport Frameworks 2016 as a design and build contract. 1.9 The initial grant of £0.926m awarded under the first bid has already been added to the capital programme. The second grant of £1.532m awarded in August 2017 is still to be entered onto the capital programme. 1.10 In order for the project to progress it is necessary to appoint a main contractor to deliver the Design & Build stages. This contract is to be awarded following a competitive process under Lot 2 of the WSCC Highways & Transport Frameworks 2016. The frameworks have already been competitively awarded under an OJEU compliant procurement process. 1.11 The contract will be awarded in two parts; Part 1 Detailed Design and Part 2, Construction, under a Limited Letter of Instruction. This will allow a break between the Design & Build stages during which WSCC will review the prices and the contract data with support from Professional Services before proceeding with an award for the construction stage which will require a further Limited Letter of Instruction. 2. Proposal 2.1 It is proposed to introduce a road safety improvement scheme on the A285 between the A27 and Petworth consisting of the works detailed in the two successful bids to the DfT and outlined in paragraph 1.7 above. The interventions contained in the overall programme are intended to improve the quality of the route by raising the star rating of the A285 to a minimum of 2 stars and to achieve 3 stars where possible. 2.2 In order to deliver this scheme the additional funds secured via the second DfT bid need to be added to the existing scheme funding in the capital programme and Highways and Transport require the authority to enter into a contracting relationship with a suitable delivery partner via our existing framework arrangements as detailed in paragraphs 1.10 and 1.11 above. 3. Resources 3.1 The pre-tender estimated cost of the project is £2.1m. The total DfT Road Safety Fund grant of £2.458m is expected to be sufficient to deliver the project. 3.2 Of the total grant £0.2m is allocated as project management and design costs and a project team comprising of WSCC officers supported by a project manager and quantity surveyor supplied by WSP the term consultant. 3.3 Improving the one star rated section of the route (Halnaker to Upwaltham) has a predicted BCR (Benefit Cost Ratio) of 2.91, with a slightly lower BCR of 1.96 for the rest of the route. Factors taken into account 4. Consultation 4.1 Internal WSCC Departments, Cabinet Member for Highways & Infrastructure, Local Members for: Petworth, Fernhurst, Chichester North, South Downs National Park Association, Boxgrove, East Dean, Eartham, Upwaltham, Duncton, Petworth and East Lavington Parish Councils, and the North and South Chichester County Local Committee’s. 4.2 The Cabinet Member for Highways and Infrastructure has expressed support for the scheme to be included in the highways capital improvement programmes for 2017/18 and 2018/19. 4.3 Initial stakeholder consultation on the scope and proposed countermeasures has been undertaken. A meeting was held on the 14 March 2017 with the Parish Councils, South Downs National Park and local Members. A further meeting was held with the South Downs National Park during September 2017. 4.4 All parties support the need to reduce casualties on the A285 whilst being sensitive to the status of the National Park. There is broad support for the measures proposed. There is also a desire to see further supporting measures should the funding permit, though the requirement to deliver the scheme in line with the DfT bidding process is generally understood. 4.5 A stakeholder engagement plan will be drawn up in parallel with the tender process to select a design and build contractor to ensure stakeholders are kept informed as the scheme progresses and help inform the local needs during construction, disseminate information to other interested parties and the public to ensure support and success of the scheme. 5. Risk Management Implications 5.1 The bids to DfT included an an optimism bias of 25%. Given that this scheme has a short programme, a well-defined scope, and a low risk of significant problems from adverse ground conditions etc., this is considered to have mitigated the risk of cost overrun. 5.2 In summary, approving the proposals recommended in this report is not considered to commit WSCC to significant spend on this project. Nor are they considered to be high risk proposals in their own right. 6. Other Options Considered 6.1 The scheme derives from a safer roads investment plan that formed the bases of two successful bids to a Department for Transport (DfT) road safety fund.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Constituences in West Sussex with Effect from the General
    CRAWLEY West Sussex Parliamentary Constituences With effect from General Election 2010 CRAWLEY Worth East Grinstead Rusper BOROUGH Ashurst Wood North Horsham Warnham Turners Hill Rudgwick Broadbridge Colgate West Heath Hoathly Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow & Ifold Loxwood Horsham Balcombe Ardingly Horsted Northchapel Keynes Linch Lurgashall Itchingfield HORSHAM Lower Slaugham Southwater Milland Fernhurst Beeding MID SUSSEX Woolbeding with Ebernoe Kirdford Nuthurst Redford Billingshurst Ansty & Cuckfield Lindfield Staplefield Rogate Urban Lodsworth Haywards Lindfield HORSHAM Heath Rural Easebourne Wisborough Green Bolney Stedham Shipley Midhurst Cowfold with Tillington Petworth MID SUSSEX Chithurst Iping Trotton with West Pulborough Chiltington Fittleworth West Grinstead Twineham Harting West Lavington Burgess Elstead & Graffham Shermanbury Treyford Bepton Stopham Hurstpierpoint Hill Heyshott & Sayers Common Duncton Woodmancote Cocking Thakeham Coldwaltham Henfield Albourne East Lavington Ashington Ashurst Barlavington Hassocks Sutton Parham Marden Upwaltham ARUNDEL & SOUTH DOWNS Compton CHICHESTER Bury Wiston West Storrington Singleton East Newtimber Dean Bignor & Sullington Dean Washington Poynings Amberley Steyning Pyecombe CHICHESTER Fulking Houghton Upper Stoughton Beeding Eartham Madehurst Slindon Burpham Bramber Lavant South Findon Boxgrove Stoke Westbourne Funtington Warningcamp Patching Coombes Arundel Westhampnett Sompting Tangmere Walberton ARUN ADUR Angmering Clapham WORTHING Southbourne Fishbourne City of Lancing Chichester
    [Show full text]
  • West Sussex Electoral Division Boundaries
    HORSHAM CRAWLEY 24 Storrington 47 Ifield, Langley Green & West Green West Sussex Electoral Division Boundaries 25 Bramber Castle 48 Northgate & Three Bridges 26 Pulborough 49 Pound Hill, Worth & Maidenbower 27 Henfield 50 Bewbush, Gossops Green & Southgate 28 Billingshurst 51 Broadfield 29 Southwater & Nuthurst 52 Tilgate & Furnace Green 30 Warnham & Rusper 47 31 Holbrook 32 Roffey 33 Horsham Carfax 48 54 Ashurst 34 Horsham Riverside CRAWLEY 49 Worth Wood East Rusper BOROUGH Grinstead 55 30 50 North Horsham Warnham 52 Turners Hill 51 31 CHICHESTER 53 Rudgwick Broadbridge Colgate West 1 The Witterings Hoathly 2 Selsey Heath 32 Slinfold 3 Chichester South Linchmere Plaistow 4 Chichester East Loxwood 33 Horsham Balcombe Ardingly 5 Chichester West 34 Northchapel 6 Bourne Linch 56 7 Chichester North Horsted 8 Midhurst Lurgashall Itchingfield Lower Slaugham Keynes Southwater 9 Fernhurst Miland Fernhurst Beeding 10 Petworth Ebernoe 29 MID SUSSEX Lindfield Kirdford 28 Nuthurst Urban 10 Billingshurst Cuckfield Rural Cuckfield Woolbeding 58 Rogate 59 Lodsworth Haywards Lindfield HORSHAM Heath Rural Easebourne Wisborough Green Bolney 57 8 Stedham Shipley Midhurst Cowfold with Tillington Petworth Chithurst Iping Trotton with West 9 Pulborough Chiltington Fittleworth West Grinstead 27 Twineham Harting 26 MID SUSSEX West Lavington Burgess Elstead & Graffham Shermanbury 60 53 Worth Forest Stopham Hill Treyford Bepton Hurstpierpoint 61 54 Imberdown Heyshott & Sayers Common 55 East Grinstead Duncton Woodmancote Cocking Thakeham 56 Lindfield & High Weald
    [Show full text]
  • CLC Boundary Map April 2011
    CRAWLEY ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 51 Langley Green & West Green HORSHAM ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 52 Northgate & Three Bridges 24 Storrington 53 Worth & Pound Hill North 25 Bramber Castle 54 Gossops Green & Ifield East 26 Pulborough 55 Bewbush & Ifield West West Sussex County Local Committees 27 Henfield 56 Broadfield 28 Billingshurst 57 Southgate & Crawley Central 29 Southwater & Nuthurst 58 Tilgate & Furnace Green With effect from April 2011 30 Warnham & Rusper 51 59 Maidenbower & Pound Hill South 31 Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath 32 Horsham Hurst 53 62 33 Horsham Riverside CRAWLEY East 34 Roffey NWorth o r61 t h 35 Holbrook 52 Grinstead Rusper 54 BOROUGH Ashurst M i d 63 Wood 30 57 59 North Horsham 55 Warnham 58 East Crawley 56West Crawley TurnersS Hill u s s e x CHICHESTER 35 60 ELECTORAL DIVISIONS Rudgwick Broadbridge Colgate West 1 The Witterings Heath 34 Hoathly 2 Selsey Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow & Ifold 32 3 Chichester South Loxwood Horsham Balcombe Ardingly 4 Chichester East 31 33 5 Chichester West Northchapel 6 Bourne Linch 64 North Horsham Horsted 7 Chichester North Lurgashall Itchingfield MID SUSSEX DISTRICT Lower Slaugham Keynes 8 Midhurst Southwater 9 Fernhurst Milland Fernhurst Beeding Ebernoe 29 10 Petworth Kirdford Nuthurst Central Mid Sussex Lindfield 10 Billingshurst Ansty & 28 Staplefield Cuckfield Urban Woolbeding 66 Rogate 67 Lodsworth HORSHAM DISTRICT Haywards Lindfield Heath 65 Rural North Chichester Wisborough Green Bolney 8 Stedham Easebourne Shipley Midhurst Cowfold with Tillington Petworth Chithurst Iping Trotton
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor Law Commission and Publicly-Owned Housing in the English Countryside, 1834–47
    The Poor Law Commission and publicly-owned housing in the English countryside, 1834–47 by Roger Wells Abstract This paper addresses aspects of the Poor Law Commission’s policy of encouraging parishes to dispose of their often considerable stock of social housing, in some cases built up over many years, and a topic previously analysed in this Review by John Broad. Policy was in part conditioned by the cost of new workhouses required in many of the unions created under the 1834 New Poor Law. This fell on indi- vidual parishes’ ratepayers; sales of their real estate would lighten, and sometimes remove, the financial pain. It also arose out of the Commission’s commitment to engineering able-bodied workers’ independ- ence through the abolition of all non-medical aid funded from the poor rate, which had traditionally included the provision of domestic accommodation at no or nominal rents by overseers of the poor. But, while putting the Commission in charge of sales by parishes, parliamentarians insisted that the own- ers and occupiers of property in each parish, had to vote to sell or retain, some or all, of their housing stock. The stipulation of compulsory disposals, which Broad erroneously assumed, remained a political impossibility. In a paper published some years ago in this Review, John Broad showed how on the eve of the New Poor Law, some parishes in southern England had accumulated considerable stocks of ‘social’ housing in which they housed their poor, rent-free or at notional rents.1 In Bedfordshire 56 per cent of parishes had some housing of this sort at their disposal, in Buckinghamshire 50 per cent.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX. [ KELLY's As to the Appropriation of the Income
    510 MIDIIURST. SUSSEX. [ KELLY'S as to the appropriation of the income. Ashfield House, a Sanitary Inspector, Samuel Edward Stratford, Lynton, home of rest for clergy of the Church of England, is Easebourne, Midhurst open throughout the year. A mound on the south bank of the West Rather was the site of the castle of the PUBLIC EST.A.BLISH:METI S. Bohuns, of which nothing now remains !lbove ground, Cemetery, Midburst common, James Lncas, clerk to the but the fosse may still be traced. The possessions of Burial Committee; Elias Madgwick, sexton the Order of Knights Hospitallers of St. John of County Court.• His Honour James Scully, judge; William Jerusalem still form a liberty, granted by Henry VTII. to Thomas J ohnson, registrar & high bailiff; Frederick Sir William Fitzwilliam and then annexed t<J the Cowdrav• James Collins, deputy bailiff. The court is held every estate; this district extended into several parishes and alternate month, at the Town hall, & comprises within enjoyed special privileges; the commandery, or abode of its jurisdiction the following parishes :-Ambersham the order, was pulled down in IBII. On the opposite side North, .A.m bersham South, Bepton, Chithurst, Cock­ of the river was the mansion of Great lfodh.am, built in ing, Did ling, Easebourne, East Lavington, Elsted, 16o6 by George Dennis, of which only the vaults now Fernhurst, Graffham, Harting, Heyshott, !ping, Linch, exist. Heathfield Lodge is the residence of Lt. -Col. Linchmere, Lodsworth, Midhurst, Rogate, Selham, Charles John Wyndham J.P. Gerald Smith esq. is lord Stedham, Terwick, Treyford, Trotton, West Lavington, of the borough of Midhurst, and the Earl of Egmont Woolbeding lord of the manor and liberty of S't.
    [Show full text]
  • Heathlands Reunited - Project Sites
    Kingsley Common [MoD] Heathlands Reunited - Project Sites Broxhead Common (East) [HCC] Broxhead Common (West) [ARCT] SiteName Source Partner Site_ID Parish Blackmoor Sites_of_Special_Scientific_Interest_SSSIs_42 ARCT Blackmoor Whitehill Shortheath Broxhead Common (West) Special_Protection_Areas_SPAs_46 ARCT Broxhead Common Whitehill Common Weavers Down (East) Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Weavers Down (East) Bramshott and Liphook [HCC] Weavers Down (West) Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Weavers Down (West) Whitehill; (Bramshott and Liphook) Bordon Woolmer Forest Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Woolmer Forest Whitehill [Whitehill Woolmer Forest Digitised using Google Earth screenshots and OS base ARCT Woolmer Forest Whitehill Town Council] Lord's Piece Lords Piece.png digitised usign OSMM Barlavington Estate Lord's Piece Sutton; Bury; (Fittleworth) Coldharbour Wood Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Coldharbour Wood Rogate The Slab Combe Hill Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Combe Hill Rogate (North) [MoD] Hambledon Piece Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Hambledon Piece Rogate The Warren, Iron Hill Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Iron Hill Linch; (Fernhurst) Shufflesheeps Forestry_Commission_Legal_Boundary_45 Forestry Commission Shufflesheeps Milland Selborne Ludshott [MoD] Common Tullecombe Tullecombe.png digitised from OSMM Forestry Commission Tullecombe Rogate
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections Are to Be Held of Councillors for the Following Wards
    NOTICE OF ELECTION CHICHESTER DISTRICT COUNCIL 2 MAY 2019 1 Elections are to be held of Councillors for the following Wards :- Ward Number of Councillors to be elected CHICHESTER CENTRAL 1 CHICHESTER EAST 2 CHICHESTER NORTH 2 CHICHESTER SOUTH 2 CHICHESTER WEST 2 EASEBOURNE (Parishes of Easebourne, Heyshott and Lodsworth) 1 FERNHURST (Parishes of Fernhurst, Lurgashall, Linch, Linchmere and Milland) 2 FITTLEWORTH (Parishes of Barlavington, Bignor, Bury, Duncton, East Lavington, 1 Fittleworth, Graffham, Stopham and Sutton) GOODWOOD (Parishes of Boxgrove, Eartham, East Dean, Singleton, Upwaltham, West Dean 1 and Westhampnett) HARBOUR VILLAGES (Parishes of Appledram, Bosham, Chidham, Donnington and 3 Fishbourne) HARTING (Parishes of Elsted & Treyford, Harting, Nyewood, Rogate and Trotton) 1 LAVANT (Parishes of Funtington and Lavant) 1 LOXWOOD (Parishes of Ebernoe, Kirdford, Loxwood, Northchapel, Plaistow & Ifold and 2 Wisborough Green) MIDHURST (Parishes of Bepton, Cocking, Midhurst, Stedham with Iping (Iping Ward), 2 Stedham with Iping (Stedham Ward), West Lavington and Woolbedding with Redford) NORTH MUNDHAM AND TANGMERE (Parishes of Hunston, Tangmere, North Mundham and 2 Oving) PETWORTH (Parishes of Petworth and Tillington) 1 SELSEY SOUTH (Parish of Selsey South Ward) 2 SIDDLESHAM WITH SELSEY NORTH (Parishes of Siddlesham and Selsey North Ward) 2 SOUTHBOURNE (Parish of Southbourne) 2 THE WITTERINGS (Parishes of Birdham, Earnley, East Wittering, Itchenor and West 3 Wittering) WESTBOURNE (Parishes of Compton, Marden, Stoughton and Westbourne) 1 2. Nomination papers may be obtained from the Elections Office at East Pallant House, Chichester, and must be delivered there on any day after the date of this notice but not later than 4PM on Wednesday, 3 APRIL 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting of the Planning Committee Held in Virtually on Wednesday 3 June 2020 at 9.30 Am
    Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held in Virtually on Wednesday 3 June 2020 at 9.30 am Members Present: Mrs C Purnell (Chairman), Rev J H Bowden (Vice-Chairman), Mr G Barrett, Mr R Briscoe, Mrs J Fowler, Mrs D Johnson, Mr G McAra, Mr S Oakley, Mr H Potter, Mr D Rodgers, Mrs S Sharp, Mr A Sutton and Mr P Wilding Members not present: In attendance by invitation: Officers present: Mr T Ayling (Divisional Manager for Planning Policy), Miss J Bell (Development Manager (Majors and Business)), Ms H Chivers (Planning Policy Officer), Miss N Golding (Principal Solicitor), Mr S Harris (Principal Planning Officer), Miss L Higenbottam (Democratic Services Manager), Miss S Hurr (Democratic Services Officer), Mr M Mew (Principal Planning Officer), Mr J Saunders (Development Manager (National Park)), Mr S Shaw (County Highways (Development Management) Team Manager), Mrs F Stevens (Development Manager (Applications)) and Mr T Whitty (Divisional Manager for Development Management) 76 Chairman's Announcements The Chairman welcomed everyone present to the virtual meeting, and confirmed that item 8 – SDNP/20/01019/FUL, Copse Cottage, Norwood Lane, East Lavington, Petworth had been withdrawn from the agenda. 77 Urgent Items The Chairman reported that there would be one urgent item: Draft Interim Policy Statement for Housing, which would be taken as the final item on the agenda. 78 Declarations of Interests Rev Bowden declared a personal interest in respect of planning application CC/19/03146/REM as a member of Chichester City Council. Mrs Johnson declared a personal interest in respect of planning application SY/20/00605/FUL as a member of Selsey Town Council.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Grants and Concessions Panel, 18/10/2016 09:30
    Public Document Pack JOHN WARD East Pallant House Head of Finance and Governance Services 1 East Pallant Chichester Contact: Lisa Higenbottam on 01243 534684 West Sussex Email: [email protected] PO19 1TY Tel: 01243 785166 www.chichester.gov.uk A meeting of Grants and Concessions Panel will be held in Committee Room 2, East Pallant House on Tuesday 18 October 2016 at 9.30 am MEMBERS: Mrs E Lintill (Chairman), Mrs C Apel, Mr I Curbishley, Mr J F Elliott, Mr J W Elliott, Mrs N Graves, Mrs P Plant and Mrs P Tull AGENDA The public, including the press, should be excluded from the meeting on the grounds of exemption under Paragraph 3 of Part I of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972, as indicated against the item and because, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption of that information outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. 1 Apologies for Absence Any apologies for absence that have been received will be noted at this point. 2 Approval of the Minutes (Pages 1 - 24) To approve as a correct record the minutes of the Grants and Concessions Panel meetings held on 14 July 2016 and 22 September 2016. 3 Matters Arising from the Minutes Any matters arising as a result of the previous minutes. 4 Declarations of Interest Members and officers are reminded to make any declarations of disclosable pecuniary, personal and/or prejudicial interests they may have in respect of matters on the agenda for this meeting. 5 Request for New Homes Bonus Variations - Overview Report (Pages 25 - 35) This reports details the three requests received for variation to New Homes Bonus funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Rights of Way Inspection Areas
    Worth Crawley East Grinstead Rusper Ashurst Wood Turners Hill Warnham North Horsham Rudgwick Colgate West Hoathly Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow Slaugham Loxwood Broadbridge HeathHorsham Balcombe Northchapel Ardingly Linch Lurgashall Itchingfield Horsted Keynes Fernhurst Lower Beeding Milland Southwater Ebernoe Nuthurst Kirdford Ansty and Staplefield Billingshurst Rogate Wisborough Green Lindfield Cuckfield Woolbeding with Redford Lodsworth Haywards Heath Lindfield Rural Bolney Trotton with Chithurst Easebourne Shipley Tillington Cowfold Stedham with Iping Petworth Midhurst West Lavington Fittleworth Pulborough West Chiltington West Grinstead Twineham Harting Stopham Shermanbury Elsted and Treyford Burgess Hill Heyshott Bepton Thakeham Hurstpierpoint and Sayers Common East LavingtonDuncton Cocking Coldwaltham Graffham Barlavington Ashington Ashurst Albourne Henfield Hassocks Woodmancote Bury Marden Sutton Parham Wiston 1 - Katherine Eels Compton Bignor Singleton Storrington and Sullington West Dean Upwaltham East Dean Washington 2 - Katrina Harper Amberley Steyning Poynings Pyecombe Newtimber Houghton Fulking Upper Beeding Stoughton Madehurst 3 - Darryl Hobden (until 1/3/17) Slindon Burpham Bramber South Stoke Findon Lavant Boxgrove Eartham Funtington Westhampnett Patching 4 - Vacant Westbourne Coombes Arundel Warningcamp Clapham Sompting Shoreham/Southwick Tangmere Walberton Lyminster and Crossbush Southbourne 5 - Nigel Bird Chichester AldingbourneEastergate Poling Angmering Lancing Fishbourne Worthing Oving Chidham and Hambrook Ford Littlehampton
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Housing Numbers Consultation – Housing Numbers Table 8.2
    Agenda Item no: 6 Chichester District Council Development Plan Panel 20 November 2012 Parish housing numbers and locations consultation: Responses from parishes 1. Contact Karen Dower, Planning Policy Manager Tel: 01243 521049; Email: [email protected] 2. Recommendation 2.1. That the responses of the parishes to the housing numbers consultation are given careful consideration. 3. Introduction 3.1. The consultation on parish housing numbers was produced as a step towards identifying a locally derived housing requirement to be incorporated into the Local Plan. 3.2. The appendices to this report present a summary of responses from the parishes that responded by 16 November 2012. 4. Background 4.1. The consultation ran from 27 September to 2 November 2012. Additional responses were received until 16 November 2012. 4.2 The purpose of the consultation was to seek the views of parish and town councils, key infrastructure providers, statutory agencies and neighbouring planning authorities about the amount of non-strategic housing to be provided in the parishes across the District over the Local Plan period to 2029. 4.3 The consultation included all parishes where Chichester District Council remains the Local Planning Authority. It also included parishes where the planning authority is split between Chichester District Council and the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA), but where the main settlement(s) lie outside of the SDNPA’s boundary. Parishes not included in the consultation are coloured grey in Appendix 1. 4.4 To inform their responses, each parish council was sent a parish specific ‘key facts’ sheet, a general table indicating the proposed parish-wide distribution of housing, and other supporting information.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Meeting NW and NE Com. Forums
    JOINT MEETING OF THE NORTH WEST AND NORTH EAST COMMUNITY FORUMS Minutes of a meeting of the Community Forum held on Tuesday, 5th April 2016, Lodsworth Village Hall at 7pm. Attendance and Apologies (in italics): Bepton Parish Council Alex Cunningham and Ros Hart Bignor Parish Meeting John Dwane Bury Parish Council Apologies sent Cocking Parish Council David Imlach Duncton Parish Council Easebourne Parish Council Stephen Lloyd East Lavington Parish Council Michael Harting Ebernoe Parish Council Apologies sent Elsted and Treyford Parish Council Andrew Leno John Smith, Maureen Timms, Bill Black and Fernhurst Parish Council Heather Bicknell Fittleworth Parish Council David Brittain Graffham Parish Council Harting Parish Council Andrew Shaxson Heyshott Parish Council Simon Laking Kirdford Parish Council Linch Parish Meeting Apologies sent Lodsworth Parish Council Deryck Hamon Loxwood Parish Council Chris Agar Anthea Martin-Jenkins, Joe Harden, Ray Lurgashall Parish Council Cooper and Andy Tate Lynchmere Parish Council Norma Graves and Sandy Moore Midhurst Town Council Mark Purves and Stephen Morley Milland Parish Council Simon Pudge Northchapel Parish Council Apologies sent Gaye Jordan Petworth Town Council Chris Kemp Plaistow & Ifold Parish Council Apologies sent Rogate Parish Council Elizabeth Brown Stedham with Iping Parish Council Lucy Petrie and Eddie Lintott Stopham Parish Meeting The Common Parish of Sutton & Apologies sent Barlavington Tillington Parish Council Apologies sent Trotton with Chithurst Parish Council 1 West Lavington Parish Council Keith Elmy Wisborough Green Parish Council Peter Drummond Woolbeding with Redford Parish Council Sussex Police Mrs Katy Bourne and Justin Burtenshaw West Sussex County Council Janet Duncton Shona Turner and Andrew Frost Chichester District Council Apologies sent Eileen Lintill and John Elliot 1.
    [Show full text]