Thesis for Word XP
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
From THE INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden DIETARY CADMIUM EXPOSURE AND THE RISK OF HORMONE-RELATED CANCERS Bettina Julin Stockholm 2012 All previously published papers were reproduced with permission from the publisher. Published by Karolinska Institutet. Printed by Larserics Digital Print AB, 2012 © Bettina Julin, 2012 ISBN 978-91-7457-710-5 ABSTRACT The toxic metal cadmium has been widely dispersed into the environment mainly through anthropogenic activities. Even in industrially non-polluted areas, farmland and consequently foods are, to a varying degree, contaminated. Food is the main source of exposure besides tobacco smoking. Cadmium accumulates in the body, particularly in the kidney where it may cause renal tubular damage. Recently, cadmium was discovered to possess endocrine disrupting properties, mainly mimicking the in vivo- effects of estrogen. The metal is classified as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer based on lung cancer studies of occupational inhalation. It is, however, not clear whether cadmium exposure via the diet may cause cancer. Possible health consequences related to estrogenic effects such as increased risk of hormone-related cancers are virtually unexplored. The aims of this thesis were to: 1) estimate the dietary exposure to cadmium, 2) estimate cadmium’s toxicokinetic variability using a population model and to establish the link between urinary cadmium concentrations (a biomarker of accumulated kidney cadmium) and the corresponding long-term dietary exposure to cadmium in the population, 3) evaluate the comparability between food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)-based estimates of dietary cadmium exposure and urinary cadmium concentrations and 4) prospectively assess the association between dietary cadmium exposure and incidence of hormone-related cancers (endometrial, breast, ovarian and prostate cancers) in two population-based cohorts consisting of around 60 000 Swedish women and 40 000 men. The main sources of dietary cadmium exposure (~80%) in both women and men were bread and other cereals, potatoes, root vegetables, and other vegetables. A one- compartment toxicokinetic model provided similar predictions of individual urinary cadmium concentrations as a more complex toxicokinetic model. We estimated the cadmium half-life to be about 11.6 years with 25% between-person variability in the population. The Pearson correlation between FFQ-based estimates of dietary cadmium exposure and urinary cadmium concentration was 0.2 and the observed sensitivity and specificity was 58% and 51%, respectively. Estimated dietary cadmium exposure was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of cancer of the endometrium, breast, and prostate (39%, 21% and 13% respectively) – but not with ovarian cancer – comparing the highest tertile of cadmium with the lowest. The risk estimates were higher in lean and normal weight women and men: we observed statistically significant increased risks of 52%, 27% and 49% for endometrial cancer, overall breast cancer and localized prostate cancer, respectively. Never-smoking women with lower endogenous (normal body mass index) and exogenous estrogens (no postmenopausal hormone use) and with a consistently high dietary exposure to cadmium assessed twice, 10 years apart, had a 2.9-fold increased risk of endometrial cancer, which may indicate an estrogenic effect. The highest risk of breast cancer (60% increase) was observed for diets high in cadmium and low in whole grain and vegetables, as compared to diets low in cadmium and high in whole grain and vegetables. Taken together these results indicate that dietary cadmium exposure may play a role in the development of hormone-related cancers. LIST OF PUBLICATIONS I. Amzal B, Julin B, Vahter M, Wolk A, Johanson G, Åkesson A. Population toxicokinetic modeling of cadmium for health risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Aug;117(8):1293-301. II. Åkesson A, Julin B, Wolk A. Long-term dietary cadmium intake and postmenopausal endometrial cancer incidence: a population-based prospective cohort study. Cancer Res. 2008 Aug 1;68(15):6435-41. III. Julin B, Wolk A, Bergkvist L, Bottai M, Åkesson A. Dietary cadmium exposure and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer: A population-based prospective cohort study. Cancer Res, 2012 Mar 15;72(6):1459-66. IV. Julin B, Wolk A, Åkesson A. Dietary cadmium exposure and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in a prospective cohort of Swedish women. Br J Cancer. 2011 Jul 26;105(3):441- 4. V. Julin B, Wolk A, Johansson J-E, Andersson S-O, Andrén O, Åkesson A. Dietary cadmium exposure and risk prostate cancer: A population-based prospective cohort study. Submitted. RELATED PUBLICATIONS Engström A, Michaëlsson K, Vahter M, Julin B, Wolk A, Åkesson A. Associations between dietary cadmium exposure and bone mineral density and risk of osteoporosis and fractures among women. Bone. 2012. DOI 10.1016/j.bone.2012.03.18. Julin B, Vahter M, Amzal B, Wolk A, Berglund M, Åkesson A. Relation between dietary cadmium intake and biomarkers of cadmium exposure in premenopausal women accounting for body iron stores. Environ Health. 2011 Dec 16;10(1):105. Thomas LD, Michaëlsson K, Julin B, Wolk A, Åkesson A. Dietary cadmium exposure and fracture incidence among men: a population-based prospective cohort study. J Bone Miner Res. 2011 Jul;26(7):1601-8. CONTENTS 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 2 Background ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Cadmium ............................................................................................. 2 2.1.1 Exposure ................................................................................. 2 2.1.2 Uptake and distribution .......................................................... 3 2.1.3 Biomarkers of exposure ......................................................... 3 2.1.4 Health effects .......................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Population modeling .............................................................. 5 2.1.6 Risk assessment ...................................................................... 6 2.2 Endocrine disruption ........................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Cadmium and hormone-disruption ........................................ 7 2.3 Hormone-related cancers .................................................................... 8 2.3.1 Endometrial cancer ................................................................. 9 2.3.2 Breast cancer ........................................................................ 11 2.3.3 Ovarian cancer ...................................................................... 13 2.3.4 Prostate cancer ...................................................................... 15 2.4 Cadmium and Hormone-related cancer ........................................... 16 3 Aim ............................................................................................................. 18 4 Subjects and methods ................................................................................. 19 4.1 Study population ............................................................................... 19 4.1.1 The Swedish Mammography Cohort ................................... 19 4.1.2 The Cohort of Swedish Men ................................................ 22 4.2 Exposure assessment ........................................................................ 23 4.2.1 Assessment of diet and lifestyle factors ............................... 23 4.2.2 Assessment of dietary cadmium exposure .......................... 23 4.2.3 Assessment of urinary cadmium .......................................... 24 4.3 Toxicokinetic modeling (paper I) ..................................................... 25 4.3.1 Model comparison ................................................................ 25 4.3.2 Population modeling ............................................................ 27 4.3.3 Application of model estimates on risk assessment ............ 27 4.4 Case ascertainment (papers II-V) ..................................................... 28 4.5 Statistical analysis (Papers II-V) ...................................................... 28 4.5.1 Dietary cadmium versus urinary cadmium concentrations (paper III, supplementary data) ................... 28 4.5.2 Dietary cadmium exposure and the risk of hormone- related cancers (Paper II-V) ................................................. 29 5 Results ......................................................................................................... 32 5.1 Population toxicokinetic modeling (paper I) ................................... 32 5.2 FFQ-based estimates of dietary cadmium versus urinary cadmium concentrations (paper III, supplementary data) .. 34 5.3 Cadmium and endometrial cancer (paper II) ................................... 34 5.4 Cadmium and breast cancer (paper III)............................................ 38 5.5 Cadmium and ovarian cancer (paper IV) ......................................... 44 5.6 Cadmium and prostate cancer (paper V) ......................................... 44 6 Discussion ................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Methodological considerations .......................................................