DOCSLIB.ORG

Luna 17/Lunokhod 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

:UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 261 [7428] 19.8.20073:22PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 261 Operations officially ended on 4 October 1971, by which time it had travelled 10.5 km and had obtained more than 20 000 single pictures (to assist with driving opera­ tions) and over 200 panoramas. It conducted about 500 lunar regolith tests by pressing a probe into the ground, observed wheel tracks to estimate regolith mechanical properties, and made chemical composition measure­ ments by means of an X-ray spectrometer at 25 loca­ tions. The Lunokhods were originally conceived as vehicles which would survey and prepare sites for human landings, but they became highly effective explorers in their own right. The landing spacecraft, Luna 17, had dual ramps by which Lunokhod 1 could be driven down to the surface. Lunokhod 1 consisted of a near-cylindrical pressurized compartment, tapered slightly towards the base, on eight independently powered wheels. Internal temperatures were maintained at night by a radioisotope heater. On top were a conical omnidirectional antenna and a high- gain helical antenna. Two television cameras mounted at the front provided information to drivers on Earth. Two panoramic cameras were mounted on each side of the body, one facing outwards and one facing downwards, both providing 180° views from the forward to back­ ward directions. The body also supported deployable experiments to contact the lunar regolith for density and mechanical property tests. An X-ray spectrometer for soil composi­ 10 November 1970: Luna 17/Lunokhod 1 (Soviet tion measurements, a regolith radioactivity detector, an Union) instrument for solar and cosmic X-ray observations, cos­ mic-ray detectors, and a French laser retroreflector were Luna 17 carried the 750 kg Lunokhod 1 rover, which also operated. Lunokhod was powered by batteries which could be remotely controlled by a five-person crew at a could be charged by solar cells mounted on the underside communication center outside Moscow. This was the of a large convex folding lid, which was closed at night to first remotely controlled rover mission ever carried out. help insulate the interior and opened during the day. The spacecraft was launched from Baikonur at 14:44 Luna 17 landed about 60 km southwest of UT, placed in a parking orbit, then sent to the Moon. Promontorium Heraclides, the southern end of the It entered lunar orbit on 15 November, initially circular Montes Jura surrounding Sinus Iridum. The exact site at 90 km altitude with an inclination of 141°. Later its has not been pinpointed but a possible candidate for a low point was dropped to 20 km, and it landed on 17 large crater seen by the rover is identified in Figure 242, November at 03:47 UT at a position usually given as based on a comparison of the Lunokhod route map 38.28° N, 35.00° W in northwestern Mare Imbrium (see (Figures 243 to 245) with the best orbital images of the below). region. Based on this possible identification, the current Lunokhod rolled off the east-facing ramp of its lander coordinates of the rover are believed to be 35.190° W, at 06:28 UT. It was intended to operate for three lunar 38.287° N. In 2006 new laser shots were to be made at days but survived for eleven lunar days (322 Earth days). that point. :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 262 [7428] 19.8.20073:22PM 262 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration Figure 240 shows the region in which Luna 17 landed. This was the most northerly landing site on the Moon during the missions of the Luna and Apollo period, about The route of Lunokhod 1 is mapped in Figures 242, 1200 km north of Surveyor 1 and Apollo 12. Figure 241 243 and 244. The three figures correspond to three shows the landing site in increasing detail, identifying the sections of the map in Figure 24IE, also shown as an tentative site identification described above. inset in Figure 243. The 500 m grid overlay shows :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 263 [7428] 19.8.20073:22PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 263 Lunokhod 1 began by driving south from its landing site (Figure 242). After two lunar days it stopped at its southernmost point in a 150 m diameter crater. On the third day it returned to the lander, moving faster as its drivers gained experience. On the fourth day it moved towards the north (Figure 243), spending three lunar days exploring the largest craters it encountered. It drove around the rim of a roughly 500 m diameter subdued crater during this time. This crater may be visible in Figure 241D. In its final months of activity Lunokhod 1 was driven further north, generally in the direction of the hills seen from the original landing site. It was navigated around a cluster of craters during the summer of 1971. In its final month it moved only a short distance as it was wearing out. Operations ceased when the internal radioactive heat source was depleted and equipment froze during the eleventh lunar night. The vehicle was parked in a position which was sup­ posed to allow its laser retroreflector to be used for later ranging studies, but this may not have been successful, perhaps due to an unexpected failure. The seven detailed plans in Figure 245 are adapted from figures in Vinogradov (1971b). They show the loca­ tions of craters and rocks in areas which were selected for detailed mapping, as well as the pattern of rover opera­ tions in each location. P represents locations at which one or more panoramic images were made. Note that on the smaller-scale maps of the whole route (Figures 242 to 244) the details of rocks and craters are somewhat sche­ matic. In these plans they should be more reliable. Lunokhod 1 was not normally driven when the Sun was low in the sky because long shadows made safe driving difficult, or when the Sun was too high to show distances measured from the landing site. X represents relief clearly. location of X-ray measurements of soil composition. P The area immediately surrounding the Luna 17 land­ represents locations where panoramic images were ing site (Figure 246) was mapped using Lunokhod 1 obtained. Areas labelled as Plans 1 to 7 are mapped in images. The lander made two footpad impressions dur­ more detail in Figures 245 and 246. Inset images in ing the touchdown, and its rocket exhaust disturbed soil Figure 242 show the view to the east from Lunokhod 1 on its southwest side. The ramps were lowered and the before it left its lander (lower left) and the Luna 17 lander controllers drove Lunokhod 1 off the eastern ramp on viewed from Lunokhod 1 on 20 January 1971 (upper 17 November. right). These maps are composites of several illustrations After two lunar days exploring south of the lander, in Vinogradov (1971a, b), incorporating attempts to Lunokhod 1 was navigated back to the landing stage to resolve differences between the originals. spend the lunar night a few meters southwest of the :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 264 [7428] 19.8.20073:22PM 264 International Atlas of Lunar Exploration Several Lunokhod 1 panoramas shown in Figure 247 have been reprojected to make the horizon level. The region is generally flat, presenting no difficulty to mobi­ lity except near larger craters. Lunokhod panoramas are often printed in reverse (flipped right to left), but are corrected here based on comparisons with the detailed site plans. The bell-shaped object at the top of each panorama is an orientation indicator. Additional panoramas from Lunokhod 1 are included in Figure 248. Figure 249A, B and C are three views from Lunokhod 1 of hills seen on the horizon. 249A and 249B show a group of hills lying roughly NNW of Luna 17, as seen from the landing site (249A) and from the plan 7 area (249B). Figure 249C includes several small hills due north of the Plan 7 area, probably only local relief and so not useful for locating the site. The other hills may be more useful, but uncertainties in orientation of the panoramas make it difficult to use these features to pinpoint the site precisely. Figure 249D shows the most likely identification of these distant hills, on a ridge to the west of Promontorium Heraclides. The peak indi­ cated by the arrow may be the most prominent of the hills seen on the horizon. It lies 60 km from Luna 17. Figure 249E shows the landing region with dots marking the targets of laser reflection attempts on 5 and 6 December 1970 (Vinogradov 1971b). The white ellipse shows the approximate size of the instantaneous laser-illuminated area. Reflections were obtained from lander. After the Sun rose again the rover was driven points 1 and 2, but only very weakly from 3 and hardly at around the lander and set off in a northerly direction on all from 4. T is the tracking estimate of the site. The 7 February 1971. The scale is only approximate in this landing site suggested in Figure 241E (L, shown as a dot very rough sketch map. with a white center) is within 6 km of T. :UP/3-PAGINATION/IAW-PROOFS/3B2/978«52181«5(M.3D 279 [7428] 19.8.20073:23PM Chronological sequence of missions and events 279 Figure 240 Luna 17 landing area. Base map: ACIC Lunar chart LAC 24 (Sinus Iridum), original scale 1:1000 000, 1st edition, September 1966.
Recommended publications
  • TRANSIENT LUNAR PHENOMENA: REGULARITY and REALITY Arlin P

    TRANSIENT LUNAR PHENOMENA: REGULARITY and REALITY Arlin P

    The Astrophysical Journal, 697:1–15, 2009 May 20 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/1 C 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. TRANSIENT LUNAR PHENOMENA: REGULARITY AND REALITY Arlin P. S. Crotts Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA Received 2007 June 27; accepted 2009 February 20; published 2009 April 30 ABSTRACT Transient lunar phenomena (TLPs) have been reported for centuries, but their nature is largely unsettled, and even their existence as a coherent phenomenon is controversial. Nonetheless, TLP data show regularities in the observations; a key question is whether this structure is imposed by processes tied to the lunar surface, or by terrestrial atmospheric or human observer effects. I interrogate an extensive catalog of TLPs to gauge how human factors determine the distribution of TLP reports. The sample is grouped according to variables which should produce differing results if determining factors involve humans, and not reflecting phenomena tied to the lunar surface. Features dependent on human factors can then be excluded. Regardless of how the sample is split, the results are similar: ∼50% of reports originate from near Aristarchus, ∼16% from Plato, ∼6% from recent, major impacts (Copernicus, Kepler, Tycho, and Aristarchus), plus several at Grimaldi. Mare Crisium produces a robust signal in some cases (however, Crisium is too large for a “feature” as defined). TLP count consistency for these features indicates that ∼80% of these may be real. Some commonly reported sites disappear from the robust averages, including Alphonsus, Ross D, and Gassendi.
  • 50. Obletnica Pristanka Na Luni in Pomen Osvajanja Vesolja Za Geodezijo 50Th Anniversary of the Moon Landing and the Importance

    50. Obletnica Pristanka Na Luni in Pomen Osvajanja Vesolja Za Geodezijo 50Th Anniversary of the Moon Landing and the Importance

    GEODETSKI VESTNIK | 63/4 | 50. OBLETNICA PRISTANKA 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF NA LUNI IN POMEN THE MOON LANDING AND OSVAJANJA VESOLJA ZA THE IMPORTANCE OF GEODEZIJO CONQUERING SPACE FOR GEODESY Sandi Berk STROKOVNE RAZPRAVE | PROFESSIONAL DISCUSSIONS RAZPRAVE STROKOVNE 1 UVOD Letos mineva petdeset let od prvega obiska človeka na edini Zemljini luni – Mesecu (v nadaljevanju kar: Luna). Ta »majhen korak za človeka, a velikanski skok za človeštvo« je bil storjen 20. julija 1969, ko sta Neil Armstrong in Edwin Aldrin v lunarnem modulu Eagle (tj. Orel) pristala poleg Malega zahodnega kraterja v Morju tišine (slika 1). Okrogla obletnica je priložnost, da se ozremo nazaj in osvežimo dogod- ke iz pionirskih časov osvajanja vesolja. Hkrati lahko osvetlimo pomen takratnih podvigov ter njihove učinke na tehnološki razvoj in tudi napredek geodezije. Slika 1: Armstrongova fotografija Aldrina ob nameščenem seizmografu; nad njim je reflektor za lasersko merjenje oddaljenosti od Zemlje, desno zgoraj pa je lunarni modul Eagle (vir: NASA, 2019). | 589 | | 63/4 | GEODETSKI VESTNIK Kje se sploh prične vesolje – kako visoko je treba poleteti? Mejo med Zemljino atmosfero in vesoljskim prostorom (angl. outer space) imenujemo Kármánova ločnica in je približno sto kilometrov nad površjem Zemlje. Nad to višino za letenje ne veljajo več zakoni aerodinamike, ampak je mogoče zgolj še letenje po zakonih balistike, torej na raketni pogon. Pomembna je tudi v pravnem smislu, saj se tu konča zračni prostor držav in začne veljati mednarodno vesoljsko pravo. Kot vemo, letijo potniška letala na višini približno deset kilometrov. Nedavni rekordni polet z jadralnim letalom je dosegel višino 23 kilometrov nad morjem, vendar s pomočjo stratosferskih zavetrnih valov, ki nastajajo zaradi izredno močnih zračnih tokov med visokimi gorskimi vrhovi Andov (Ebbesen Jensen, 2019).
  • The Soviet Space Program

    The Soviet Space Program

    C05500088 TOP eEGRET iuf 3EEA~ NIE 11-1-71 THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM Declassified Under Authority of the lnteragency Security Classification Appeals Panel, E.O. 13526, sec. 5.3(b)(3) ISCAP Appeal No. 2011 -003, document 2 Declassification date: November 23, 2020 ifOP GEEAE:r C05500088 1'9P SloGRET CONTENTS Page THE PROBLEM ... 1 SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS l DISCUSSION 5 I. SOV.IET SPACE ACTIVITY DURING TfIE PAST TWO YEARS . 5 II. POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE PROSPECTS . 6 A. General ............................................. 6 B. Organization and Management . ............... 6 C. Economics .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...... .. 8 III. SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL FACTORS ... 9 A. General .. .. .. .. .. 9 B. Launch Vehicles . 9 C. High-Energy Propellants .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 11 D. Manned Spacecraft . 12 E. Life Support Systems . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 F. Non-Nuclear Power Sources for Spacecraft . 16 G. Nuclear Power and Propulsion ..... 16 Te>P M:EW TCS 2032-71 IOP SECl<ET" C05500088 TOP SECRGJ:. IOP SECREI Page H. Communications Systems for Space Operations . 16 I. Command and Control for Space Operations . 17 IV. FUTURE PROSPECTS ....................................... 18 A. General ............... ... ···•· ................. ····· ... 18 B. Manned Space Station . 19 C. Planetary Exploration . ........ 19 D. Unmanned Lunar Exploration ..... 21 E. Manned Lunar Landfog ... 21 F. Applied Satellites ......... 22 G. Scientific Satellites ........................................ 24 V. INTERNATIONAL SPACE COOPERATION ............. 24 A. USSR-European Nations .................................... 24 B. USSR-United States 25 ANNEX A. SOVIET SPACE ACTIVITY ANNEX B. SOVIET SPACE LAUNCH VEHICLES ANNEX C. SOVIET CHRONOLOGICAL SPACE LOG FOR THE PERIOD 24 June 1969 Through 27 June 1971 TCS 2032-71 IOP SLClt~ 70P SECRE1- C05500088 TOP SEGR:R THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM THE PROBLEM To estimate Soviet capabilities and probable accomplishments in space over the next 5 to 10 years.' SUMMARY OF KEY JUDGMENTS A.
  • Spacecraft Deliberately Crashed on the Lunar Surface

    Spacecraft Deliberately Crashed on the Lunar Surface

    A Summary of Human History on the Moon Only One of These Footprints is Protected The narrative of human history on the Moon represents the dawn of our evolution into a spacefaring species. The landing sites - hard, soft and crewed - are the ultimate example of universal human heritage; a true memorial to human ingenuity and accomplishment. They mark humankind’s greatest technological achievements, and they are the first archaeological sites with human activity that are not on Earth. We believe our cultural heritage in outer space, including our first Moonprints, deserves to be protected the same way we protect our first bipedal footsteps in Laetoli, Tanzania. Credit: John Reader/Science Photo Library Luna 2 is the first human-made object to impact our Moon. 2 September 1959: First Human Object Impacts the Moon On 12 September 1959, a rocket launched from Earth carrying a 390 kg spacecraft headed to the Moon. Luna 2 flew through space for more than 30 hours before releasing a bright orange cloud of sodium gas which both allowed scientists to track the spacecraft and provided data on the behavior of gas in space. On 14 September 1959, Luna 2 crash-landed on the Moon, as did part of the rocket that carried the spacecraft there. These were the first items humans placed on an extraterrestrial surface. Ever. Luna 2 carried a sphere, like the one pictured here, covered with medallions stamped with the emblem of the Soviet Union and the year. When Luna 2 impacted the Moon, the sphere was ejected and the medallions were scattered across the lunar Credit: Patrick Pelletier surface where they remain, undisturbed, to this day.
  • Water on the Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity

    Water on the Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity

    Water on The Moon, III. Volatiles & Activity Arlin Crotts (Columbia University) For centuries some scientists have argued that there is activity on the Moon (or water, as recounted in Parts I & II), while others have thought the Moon is simply a dead, inactive world. [1] The question comes in several forms: is there a detectable atmosphere? Does the surface of the Moon change? What causes interior seismic activity? From a more modern viewpoint, we now know that as much carbon monoxide as water was excavated during the LCROSS impact, as detailed in Part I, and a comparable amount of other volatiles were found. At one time the Moon outgassed prodigious amounts of water and hydrogen in volcanic fire fountains, but released similar amounts of volatile sulfur (or SO2), and presumably large amounts of carbon dioxide or monoxide, if theory is to be believed. So water on the Moon is associated with other gases. Astronomers have agreed for centuries that there is no firm evidence for “weather” on the Moon visible from Earth, and little evidence of thick atmosphere. [2] How would one detect the Moon’s atmosphere from Earth? An obvious means is atmospheric refraction. As you watch the Sun set, its image is displaced by Earth’s atmospheric refraction at the horizon from the position it would have if there were no atmosphere, by roughly 0.6 degree (a bit more than the Sun’s angular diameter). On the Moon, any atmosphere would cause an analogous effect for a star passing behind the Moon during an occultation (multiplied by two since the light travels both into and out of the lunar atmosphere).
  • Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)

    Apollo Over the Moon: a View from Orbit (Nasa Sp-362)

    chl APOLLO OVER THE MOON: A VIEW FROM ORBIT (NASA SP-362) Chapter 1 - Introduction Harold Masursky, Farouk El-Baz, Frederick J. Doyle, and Leon J. Kosofsky [For a high resolution picture- click here] Objectives [1] Photography of the lunar surface was considered an important goal of the Apollo program by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The important objectives of Apollo photography were (1) to gather data pertaining to the topography and specific landmarks along the approach paths to the early Apollo landing sites; (2) to obtain high-resolution photographs of the landing sites and surrounding areas to plan lunar surface exploration, and to provide a basis for extrapolating the concentrated observations at the landing sites to nearby areas; and (3) to obtain photographs suitable for regional studies of the lunar geologic environment and the processes that act upon it. Through study of the photographs and all other arrays of information gathered by the Apollo and earlier lunar programs, we may develop an understanding of the evolution of the lunar crust. In this introductory chapter we describe how the Apollo photographic systems were selected and used; how the photographic mission plans were formulated and conducted; how part of the great mass of data is being analyzed and published; and, finally, we describe some of the scientific results. Historically most lunar atlases have used photointerpretive techniques to discuss the possible origins of the Moon's crust and its surface features. The ideas presented in this volume also rely on photointerpretation. However, many ideas are substantiated or expanded by information obtained from the huge arrays of supporting data gathered by Earth-based and orbital sensors, from experiments deployed on the lunar surface, and from studies made of the returned samples.
  • Mapping and GIS-Analyses of the Lunokhod-1 Landing Site

    Mapping and GIS-Analyses of the Lunokhod-1 Landing Site

    43rd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2012) 1750.pdf Mapping and GIS-Analyses of the Lunokhod-1 Landing Site. E. Gusakova1, I. Karachevtseva1, K.Shingareva1, J. Oberst1,2,3, O. Peters2, M.Wählisch2, and M. S. Robinson4. 1Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (MIIGAiK), Gorokhovskiy per., 4, 105064, Moscow, Russia; 2German Aerospace Center (DLR); 3 Technical Uni- versity of Berlin, Germany; 4Arizona State University, USA Introduction: The Soviet spacecraft Luna 17 was small craters, which could be compare with results of launched towards the Moon in November 1970 and mapping that had been carried out during the Lunok- deployed Lunokhod-1, the first rover to explore an hod-1 mission. We conclude that LRO NAC images extraterrestrial surface. Until October 1971, Lunokhod- can be used for cartography support at high level of 1 acquired about 20,000 TV pictures and 206 stereo detail for characterization of future landing sites such images along its traverse [1]. Using recent new high as LUNA-GLOB and LUNA-RESOURCE. resolution images we mapped the landing site and tra- Reference: [1] Barsukov V.L. et. al. (1978) Pe- verse route, using automated GIS-oriented mapping. redvijnaya laboratoriya na Lune Lunokhod-1, Vol. 2. Sources: We used high resolution Digital Eleva- Nauka (in Russian). [2] Oberst J. et al. (2010) LPSC tion Model (DEM) and orthoimage from photogram- XLI, Abstract #2051. [3] Kneissl T. et al. (2011) Pla- metric processing of Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter net. Space Sci., 59, 1243-1254. [4] Karachevtseva I. et Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) stereo al. (2011) The Book of Abstracts of the 2-nd Moscow images [2] with a spatial resolution of 0.5 m/pixel Solar System Symposium (2M-S3), Space Research (M150749234, M150756018).
  • Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: a Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 | Asifa

    Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: a Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 | Asifa

    dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 1 Deep Space Chronicle Deep Space Chronicle: A Chronology ofDeep Space and Planetary Probes, 1958–2000 |Asif A.Siddiqi National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA SP-2002-4524 A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 Asif A. Siddiqi NASA SP-2002-4524 Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 dsc_cover (Converted)-1 8/6/02 10:33 AM Page 2 Cover photo: A montage of planetary images taken by Mariner 10, the Mars Global Surveyor Orbiter, Voyager 1, and Voyager 2, all managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. Included (from top to bottom) are images of Mercury, Venus, Earth (and Moon), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and its Moon, and Mars) and the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) are roughly to scale to each other. NASA SP-2002-4524 Deep Space Chronicle A Chronology of Deep Space and Planetary Probes 1958–2000 ASIF A. SIDDIQI Monographs in Aerospace History Number 24 June 2002 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of External Relations NASA History Office Washington, DC 20546-0001 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siddiqi, Asif A., 1966­ Deep space chronicle: a chronology of deep space and planetary probes, 1958-2000 / by Asif A. Siddiqi. p.cm. – (Monographs in aerospace history; no. 24) (NASA SP; 2002-4524) Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Space flight—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series. III. NASA SP; 4524 TL 790.S53 2002 629.4’1’0904—dc21 2001044012 Table of Contents Foreword by Roger D.
  • Planetary Rover Mobility on Loose Soil

    Planetary Rover Mobility on Loose Soil

    PLANETARYROVERMOBILITYONLOOSESOIL: TERRAMECHANICSTHEORYFORSIDESLIPPREDICTION ANDCOMPENSATION nicolò carletti Supervisor: Prof. Michéle Lavagna Master of Science Space Engineering Department of Aerospace Science and Technology Politecnico di Milano December 2016 – 816663 ABSTRACT The aim of this thesis is to develop a model which can predict a mobile trajectory profile of the rover under loose soil condition. The study also encapsulates a traversal run in a sloped terrain without the skid characteristics. The geometry and features are defined to model the rover as known as Moonraker: the lunar rover of the team HAKUTO, competing for the Google Lunar XPRIZE. After a brief introduction of the working environment, a chapter is de- dicated to the modeling of the forces generated from the interaction between wheels with soil, depending on the slip ratio and the slip angle. The used model is the one proposed by G. Ishigami [6, 7, 8, 9], based on the work of M. G. Bekker [1, 2] and J. Y. Wong [3] and modi- fied, according to what proposed by M. Sutoh [11, 12, 13], to explicitly consider the grouser effect. The model is verified through One-Wheel tests. The equations of motion are retrieved and the numerical simulation with iterative loop is described. The desired state is reached imposing arbitrary inputs to the wheels. Two input strategies are discussed: torque input and velocity input. The resulting motion is compared with tests on both controlled (sand- box) and uncontrolled environment. The former is mainly used to ve- rify the precision of the model, and the latter to prove the sensibility to the ground properties.
  • The Development of Wheels for the Lunar Roving Vehicle

    The Development of Wheels for the Lunar Roving Vehicle

    NASA/TM—2009-215798 The Development of Wheels for the Lunar Roving Vehicle Vivake Asnani, Damon Delap, and Colin Creager Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio December 2009 NASA STI Program . in Profi le Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientifi c and technical NASA Scientifi c and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientifi c, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Offi cer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- Server, thus providing one of the largest collections language translations of foreign scientifi c and of aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major signifi cant phase For more information about the NASA STI of research that present the results of NASA program, see the following: programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis.
  • ILWS Report 137 Moon

    ILWS Report 137 Moon

    Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Returning to the Moon Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Dirk HR Spennemann Guy Murphy Albury February 2020 © 2011, revised 2020. All rights reserved by the authors. The contents of this publication are copyright in all countries subscribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this report may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, in existence or to be invented, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the authors, except where permitted by law. Preferred citation of this Report Spennemann, Dirk HR & Murphy, Guy (2020). Returning to the Moon. Heritage issues raised by the Google Lunar X Prize. Institute for Land, Water and Society Report nº 137. Albury, NSW: Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University. iv, 35 pp ISBN 978-1-86-467370-8 Disclaimer The views expressed in this report are solely the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of Charles Sturt University. Contact Associate Professor Dirk HR Spennemann, MA, PhD, MICOMOS, APF Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury NSW 2640, Australia. email: [email protected] Spennemann & Murphy (2020) Returning to the Moon: Heritage Issues Raised by the Google Lunar X Prize Page ii CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 2. HUMAN ARTEFACTS ON THE MOON 3 What Have These Missions Left BehinD? 4 Impactor Missions 10 Lander Missions 11 Rover Missions 11 Sample Return Missions 11 Human Missions 11 The Lunar Environment & ImpLications for Artefact Preservation 13 Decay caused by ascent module 15 Decay by solar radiation 15 Human Interference 16 3.
  • What's Hot on the Moon Tonight?: the Ultimate Guide to Lunar Observing

    What's Hot on the Moon Tonight?: the Ultimate Guide to Lunar Observing

    What’s Hot on the Moon Tonight: The Ultimate Guide to Lunar Observing Copyright © 2015 Andrew Planck All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any written, electronic, recording, or photocopying without written permission of the publisher or author. The exception would be in the case of brief quotations embodied in the critical articles or reviews and pages where permission is specifically granted by the publisher or author. Although every precaution has been taken to verify the accuracy of the information contained herein, the publisher and author assume no responsibility for any errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for damages that may result from the use of information contained within. Books may be purchased by contacting the publisher or author through the website below: AndrewPlanck.com Cover and Interior Design: Nick Zelinger (NZ Graphics) Publisher: MoonScape Publishing, LLC Editor: John Maling (Editing By John) Manuscript Consultant: Judith Briles (The Book Shepherd) ISBN: 978-0-9908769-0-8 Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2014918951 1) Science 2) Astronomy 3) Moon Dedicated to my wife, Susan and to my two daughters, Sarah and Stefanie Contents Foreword Acknowledgments How to Use this Guide Map of Major Seas Nightly Guide to Lunar Features DAYS 1 & 2 (T=79°-68° E) DAY 3 (T=59° E) Day 4 (T=45° E) Day 5 (T=24° E.) Day 6 (T=10° E) Day 7 (T=0°) Day 8 (T=12° W) Day 9 (T=21° W) Day 10 (T= 28° W) Day 11 (T=39° W) Day 12 (T=54° W) Day 13 (T=67° W) Day 14 (T=81° W) Day 15 and beyond Day 16 (T=72°) Day 17 (T=60°) FINAL THOUGHTS GLOSSARY Appendix A: Historical Notes Appendix B: Pronunciation Guide About the Author Foreword Andrew Planck first came to my attention when he submitted to Lunar Photo of the Day an image of the lunar crater Pitatus and a photo of a pie he had made.