DOCSLIB.ORG

Yadon's Piperia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yadon's Piperia Wednesday, October 18, 2006 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Designation of Critical Habitat for Piperia yadonii (Yadon’s piperia); Proposed Rule VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:52 Oct 17, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\18OCP2.SGM 18OCP2 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL2 61546 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 1766, ext. 319; facsimile (805) 644– file format and avoid the use of special 3958). characters or any form of encryption. Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Please also include ‘‘Attn: Yadon’s piperia’’ in your e-mail subject header 50 CFR Part 17 Public Comments Solicited and your name and return address in RIN 1018–AU34 We intend that any final action the body of your message. If you do not resulting from this proposal will be as receive a confirmation from the system Endangered and Threatened Wildlife accurate and as effective as possible. that we have received your e-mail and Plants; Proposed Designation of Therefore, comments or suggestions message, contact us directly by calling Critical Habitat for Piperia Yadonii from the public, other concerned our VFWO at phone number (805) 644– (Yadon’s Piperia) governmental agencies, the scientific 1766, ext. 333. Please note that the e- community, industry, or any other mail address [email protected] will be AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, interested party concerning this closed out at the termination of the Interior. proposed rule are hereby solicited. public comment period. Our practice is to make comments, ACTION: Proposed rule. Comments particularly are sought including names and home addresses of concerning: SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and respondents, available for public review (1) The reasons any habitat should or Wildlife Service (Service), propose to during regular business hours. should not be determined to be critical designate critical habitat for the Individual respondents may request that habitat as provided by section 4 of the endangered Piperia yadonii (Yadon’s we withhold their names and/or home Act, including whether the benefit of piperia) pursuant to the Endangered addresses, etc. but if you wish us to designation will outweigh any threats to Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). consider withholding this information In total, approximately 2,306 acres (ac) the species due to designation; you must state this prominently at the (930 hectares (ha)) fall within the (2) Specific information on the beginning of your comments. In boundaries of the proposed critical amount and distribution of Piperia addition, you must present a rationale habitat designation. The proposed yadonii habitat, what areas should be for withholding this information. This critical habitat is located in Monterey included in the designations that were rational must demonstrate that County, California. occupied at the time of listing and disclosure would constitute a clearly contain the features that are essential for DATES: unwarranted invasion of privacy. We will accept comments from the conservation of the species and why, all interested parties until December 18, Unsupported assertions will not meet and what areas that were not occupied this burden. In the absence of 2006. We must receive requests for at the listing are essential to the public hearings, in writing, at the exceptional, documentable conservation of the species and why; circumstances, this information will be address shown in the ADDRESSES section (3) Our mapping methodology and by December 4, 2006. released. We will always make criteria used for determining critical submissions from organizations or ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, habitat as well as any additional businesses, and from individuals you may submit your comments and information on features essential for the materials concerning this proposal by identifying themselves as conservation of the species; representatives of or officials of any one of several methods: (4) Land use designations and current organizations or businesses, available 1. You may submit written comments or planned activities in the subject areas for public inspection in their entirety. and information to the Field Supervisor, and their possible impacts on proposed Comments and materials received will U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ventura critical habitat; be available for public inspection, by Fish and Wildlife Office (VFWO), 2493 (5) The existence of conservation appointment, during normal business Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, agreements, management plans, or hours at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife California 93003. strategies that should be considered in Service Office at the above address. 2. You may hand-deliver written determining whether to exclude lands comments to our Ventura Fish and from the designation. If the Secretary Role of Critical Habitat in Actual Wildlife Office, at the above address. determines the benefits of excluding Practice of Administering and 3. You may send comments by lands outweigh the benefits of including Implementing the Act electronic mail (e-mail) to them, lands will be excluded from the Attention to and protection of habitat [email protected]. Please see the Public final critical habitat designation; is paramount to successful conservation Comments Solicited section below for (6) Any foreseeable economic, actions. The role that designation of file format and other information about national security, or other potential critical habitat plays in protecting electronic filing. impacts resulting from the proposed habitat of listed species, however, is 4. You may fax your comments to designation and, in particular, any often misunderstood. As discussed in (805) 644–3958. impacts on small entities; and more detail below in the discussion of 5. You may go to the Federal (7) Whether our approach to exclusions under section 4(b)(2) of the eRulemaking Portal: http:// designating critical habitat could be Act, there are significant limitations on www.regulations.gov. improved or modified in any way to the regulatory effect of designation Comments and materials received, as provide for greater public participation under section 7(a)(2) of the Act. In brief, well as supporting documentation used and understanding, or to assist us in (1) designation provides additional in the preparation of this proposed rule, accommodating public concerns and protection to habitat only where there is will be available for public inspection, comments. a federal nexus; (2) the protection is by appointment, during normal business If you wish to comment, you may relevant only when, in the absence of hours at our VFWO, at the above submit your comments and materials designation, destruction or adverse address (telephone (805) 644–1766). concerning this proposal by any one of modification of the critical habitat FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: several methods (see ADDRESSES would in fact take place (in other words, Diane Noda, Field Supervisor, VFWO, at section). Please submit electronic other statutory or regulatory protections, the above address (telephone (805) 644– comments to [email protected] in ASCII policies, or other factors relevant to VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:52 Oct 17, 2006 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\18OCP2.SGM 18OCP2 jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL2 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 201 / Wednesday, October 18, 2006 / Proposed Rules 61547 agency decision-making would not a timeframe that limits our ability to These costs, which are not required for prevent the destruction or adverse obtain and evaluate the scientific and many other conservation actions, modification); and (3) designation of other information required to make the directly reduce the funds available for critical habitat triggers the prohibition designation most meaningful. direct and tangible conservation actions. of destruction or adverse modification In light of these circumstances, the Background of that habitat, but it does not require Service believes that additional agency specific actions to restore or improve discretion would allow our focus to It is our intent to discuss only those habitat. return to those actions that provide the topics directly relevant to the Currently, only 475 species, or 36 greatest benefit to the species most in designation of critical habitat in this percent of the 1,311 listed species in the need of protection. proposed rule and that clarify the U.S. under the jurisdiction of the species description and biology Procedural and Resource Difficulties in Service, have designated critical habitat. provided in the final listing rule. For Designating Critical Habitat We address the habitat needs of all more information on Piperia yadonii, 1,311 listed species through We have been inundated with refer to the final listing rule published conservation mechanisms such as lawsuits for our failure to designate in the Federal Register on August 12, listing, section 7 consultations, the critical habitat, and we face a growing 1998 (63 FR 43100). section 4 recovery planning process, the number of lawsuits challenging critical Piperia yadonii is a perennial herb in section 9 protective prohibitions of habitat determinations once they are the Orchidaceae (Orchid family), which unauthorized take, section 6 funding to made. These lawsuits have subjected the produces one or two basal strap-shaped the States, the section 10 incidental take Service to an increasing series of court leaves that grow from an underground permit process, and cooperative, orders and court-approved settlement tuber (the storage organ which persists nonregulatory efforts with private agreements, which complying with now when the species is not present landowners. The Service believes that it consumes nearly the entire listing aboveground). P. yadonii leaves emerge is these measures that may make the program budget. This leaves the Service in late fall or winter, after the soils are difference between extinction and with little ability to prioritize its saturated by the onset of California’s survival for many species. activities to direct scarce listing wet season rains.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moths of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge
    MOTHS OF UMATILLA NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: Results from 10 sites Sampled May 22-23, 2017 Dana Ross 1005 NW 30th Street Corvallis, OR 97330 (541) 758-3006 [email protected] SUMMARY Macro-moths were sampled from the Umatilla National Wildlife Refuge for a third time 22-23 May, 2017 as part of an ongoing pollinator inventory. Blacklight traps were deployed for a single night at ten sites representative of major plant communities in the McCormack and Paterson Units. A grand total of 331 specimens and 36 moth species were sampled. Of those, 17 species (47%) were documented from the refuge for the first time. In a somewhat larger geographical context, 21 species were recorded for the first (8), second (7) or third (6) time from Morrow County, Oregon while 4 species were documented for the first (1) or second (3) time from Benton County, Washington. INTRODUCTION National Wildlife Refuges protect important habitats for many plant and animal species. Refuge inventories have frequently included plants, birds and mammals, but insects - arguably the most abundant and species-rich group in any terrestrial habitat - have largely been ignored. Small size, high species richness and a lack of identification resources have all likely contributed to their being overlooked. Certain groups such as moths, however, can be easily and inexpensively sampled using light traps and can be identified by regional moth taxonomists. Once identified, many moth species can be tied to known larval hostplant species at a given site, placing both insect and plant within a larger ecological context. Moths along with butterflies belong to the insect Order Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Orange County, California, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Thurston County, Washington, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Negative Per Capita Effects of Two Invasive Plants, Lythrum Salicaria and Phalaris Arundinacea, Volume 99 on the Moth Diversity of Wetland Communities 229 Issue 3 L.L
    Online submission at: www.editorialmanager.com/ber Bulletin of Entomological Volume 99 Issue 3 Research June 2009 Bulletin of Research Papers Bulletin of K. Kishimoto-Yamada, T. Itioka, S. Sakai, K. Momose, T. Nagamitsu, H. Kaliang, P. Meleng, L. Chong, A.A. Hamid Karim, S. Yamane, M. Kato, C.A.M. Reid, T. Nakashizuka and T. Inoue Population fluctuations of light-attracted chrysomelid beetles in relation to supra-annual Entomological Research environmental changes in a Bornean rainforest 217 Entomological S.S. Schooler, P.B. McEvoy, P. Hammond and E.M. Coombs Negative per capita effects of two invasive plants, Lythrum salicaria and Phalaris arundinacea, Volume 99 on the moth diversity of wetland communities 229 Issue 3 L.L. Stelinski and L.J. Gut June 2009 Delayed mating in tortricid leafroller species: simultaneously aging both sexes prior to mating Research is more detrimental to female reproductive potential than aging either sex alone 245 Z. Lei, T.-X. Liu and S.M. Greenberg Feeding, oviposition and survival of Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) on Bt and non-Bt cottons 253 99 Issue 3 June 2009 Volume S.J. Castle, N. Prabhaker, T.J. Henneberry and N.C. Toscano Host plant influence on susceptibility of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) to insecticides 263 M. Jonsson, S.D. Wratten, K.A. Robinson and S.A. Sam The impact of floral resources and omnivory on a four trophic level food web 275 R. Kahuthia-Gathu, B. Löhr, H.M. Poehling and P.K. Mbugua Diversity, distribution and role of wild crucifers in major cabbage and kale growing areas of Kenya 287 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Names List 6-30-21
    Insects and Related Organisms Sorted by Taxa Updated 6/30/21 Order Family Scientific Name Common Name A ACARI Acaridae Acarus siro Linnaeus grain mite ACARI Acaridae Aleuroglyphus ovatus (Troupeau) brownlegged grain mite ACARI Acaridae Rhizoglyphus echinopus (Fumouze & Robin) bulb mite ACARI Acaridae Suidasia nesbitti Hughes scaly grain mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrolichus casei Oudemans cheese mite ACARI Acaridae Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank) mold mite ACARI Analgidae Megninia cubitalis (Mégnin) Feather mite ACARI Argasidae Argas persicus (Oken) Fowl tick ACARI Argasidae Ornithodoros turicata (Dugès) relapsing Fever tick ACARI Argasidae Otobius megnini (Dugès) ear tick ACARI Carpoglyphidae Carpoglyphus lactis (Linnaeus) driedfruit mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex bovis Stiles cattle Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex brevis Bulanova lesser Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex canis Leydig dog Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex caprae Railliet goat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex cati Mégnin cat Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex equi Railliet horse Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex folliculorum (Simon) Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex ovis Railliet sheep Follicle mite ACARI Demodicidae Demodex phylloides Csokor hog Follicle mite ACARI Dermanyssidae Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer) chicken mite ACARI Eriophyidae Abacarus hystrix (Nalepa) grain rust mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus essigi (Hassan) redberry mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus gossypii (Banks) cotton blister mite ACARI Eriophyidae Acalitus vaccinii
    [Show full text]
  • Attraction of Pest Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Crambidae) to Floral Lures on the Island of Hawaii
    AProceedingsttrAction of of P theest hMawaiianoths to e fntomologicallorAl lures society (2011) 43:49–58 49 Attraction of Pest Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Crambidae) to Floral Lures on the Island of Hawaii Peter Landolt1, Eric Jang2, Lori Carvalho2, and Michael Pogue3 1USDA, ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, Washington 98951 USA (corresponding author, [email protected]) 2USDA, ARS, PBARC, 64 Nowelo St., Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA, [email protected] 3USDA, ARS, Systematic Entomology Laboratory, MRC-108, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20013, USA, [email protected] Abstract. Traps baited with floral chemicals on the island of Hawaii captured several pest moth species. Chrysodeixis eriosoma (Doubleday) (green garden looper), Au- tographa biloba (Doubleday) (bi-lobed looper), and Mythimna unipuncta (Haworth) (true armyworm), all Noctuidae, as well as Hymenia recurvalis (L.) (beet webworm), a Crambidae, were trapped with phenylacetaldehyde (PAA). There was no response by moths to β-myrcene (BM), methyl salicylate (MS), cis jasmone (CJ), methyl-2-methoxy benzoate (MMB), 2-phenylethanol (2PE), or linalool (LIN) when these chemicals were tested singly. When other floral chemicals were presented in traps with PAA, numbers of C. eriosoma captured were increased by BM, MS, 2PE or MMB. Numbers of A. biloba and Peridroma saucia (Hübner) (variegated cutworm) were increased by including BM with PAA in traps. Numbers of M. unipuncta were increased by BM or 2PE, and numbers of H. recurvalis were increased by MMB or LIN, presented with PAA. Both sexes of these five species of moths were trapped with floral lures, most females captured were mated, and many females possessed mature eggs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera (Moths and Butterflies) at Inverness Ridge in Central Coastal California and Their Recovery Following a Wildfire
    LEPIDOPTERA (MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES) AT INVERNESS RIDGE IN CENTRAL COASTAL CALIFORNIA AND THEIR RECOVERY FOLLOWING A WILDFIRE J. A. Powell Essig Museum of Entomology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Abstract.— In numbers of species, Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) make up the largest group of plant-feeding animals in North America. Caterpillars of nearly all species feed on plants, and most of them are specialists on one or a few kinds of plants. Therefore they are liable to be severely affected by wildfires, and secondarily, their parasites and predators, including birds, bats, lizards, and rodents, suffer losses of a major food resource. In October 1995, a wildfire swept over part of The Point Reyes National Seashore, burning more than 12,300 acres (5,000 hectares) of public and private land, following a fire-free period of several decades. I tracked survival and recolonization by moths and butterflies during the subsequent five seasons. I made daytime searches for adults and caterpillars approximately monthly from March through October and collected blacklight trap samples, mostly in May and September-October. More than 650 species of Lepidoptera have been recorded in the Inverness Ridge area, and about 375 of them were recorded during the post-fire survey, including larvae of 31% of them. Plants in a Bishop pine forest higher on the ridge, where the fire was most intense, accumulated their caterpillar faunas slowly, while Lepidoptera feeding on plants typical of riparian woods in the lower canyons reestablished sooner and more completely. Recolonization varied markedly among different plant species, and the species richness gradually increased, in marked contrast to generalizations about effects of fire on arthropods derived from fire management of grasslands.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An Annotated List of Insects and Other Arthropods Gary L Parsons Gerasimos Cassis Andrew R. Moldenke John D. Lattin Norman H. Anderson Jeffrey C. Miller Paul Hammond Timothy D. Schowalter U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon November 1991 Parson, Gary L.; Cassis, Gerasimos; Moldenke, Andrew R.; Lattin, John D.; Anderson, Norman H.; Miller, Jeffrey C; Hammond, Paul; Schowalter, Timothy D. 1991. Invertebrates of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. V: An annotated list of insects and other arthropods. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-290. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 168 p. An annotated list of species of insects and other arthropods that have been col- lected and studies on the H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, western Cascade Range, Oregon. The list includes 459 families, 2,096 genera, and 3,402 species. All species have been authoritatively identified by more than 100 specialists. In- formation is included on habitat type, functional group, plant or animal host, relative abundances, collection information, and literature references where available. There is a brief discussion of the Andrews Forest as habitat for arthropods with photo- graphs of representative habitats within the Forest. Illustrations of selected ar- thropods are included as is a bibliography. Keywords: Invertebrates, insects, H.J. Andrews Experimental forest, arthropods, annotated list, forest ecosystem, old-growth forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Recorded on Santa Catalina Island
    LEPIDOPTERA RECORDED ON SANTA CATALINA ISLAND compiled by Jerry A. Powell August 2004; revised Jan. 2012 INTRODUCTION. --- HISTORY OF LEPIDOPTERA INVENTORY ON SANTA CATALINA ISLAND, CALIFORNIA Santa Catalina Island is the third largest of the eight Channel Islands off the coast of southern California. It is the largest and nearest to the mainland (ca. 20 miles) of the four southern islands and historically has been the most easily accessible to visitors, some of whom collected Lepidoptera long before any were recorded on the other islands. Catalina island has an area of 76 mi2 (122 km2) and is about 21 miles (34 km) long and 8 miles (13 km) wide near its center. The island is mountainous, with a central ridge along its length, reaching elevations of 2,097’ (670m) and 2,010’ (648m). The flora is diverse, 2nd only to Santa Cruz among the CA islands, with more than 400 native species of vascular plants and 175+ introduced taxa. It is the only CA island open to the public, receiving daily residential and tourist traffic, with ferry and air transportation to and from Avalon (3,000 resident population) and Two Harbors (200 residents) (Schoenherr et al. 1999). The town of Avalon was founded as a potential resort in 1887, and later the island was purchased by the Banning family, who formed the Santa Catalina Island Company and completed work on Avalon, which they promoted as a fishing resort. By the 1890s photographs taken around Avalon indicate extensive vegetation stripping by feral goats and sheep. Feral ruminants were excluded from the southeastern portion of the island following its purchase by Wm.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of San Diego County, California, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Pyraloidea: Crambidae Latreille 1810 and Pyralidae Linnaeus, 1758 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Pyraloidea: Crambidae Latreille 1810 and Pyralidae Linnaeus, 1758. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2) (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4596 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann et al. 2017) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Crambidae in the collection as of March 2019. This dataset is not complete, as portions of our North American Pyralidae remain to be digitized. This will be accomplished with a future dataset. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications for this family are tricky, especially in the Pacific Northwest where the pyraloid fauna remains relatively unstudied.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology of Yadon's Piperia: Implications for Conservation and Management Alison Graff
    The Biology of Yadon's Piperia: Implications for Conservation and Management Alison Graff The Biology of Yadon’s Piperia Funding provided by: Implications for Species Conservation and Management United States Fish and Wildlife Service Ventura Field Office Diane Steeck, Heidi Crowell, Connie Rutherford Sally Childs (SC) John Game SC Overview: Yadon’s piperia (Piperia yadonii) Life cycle Reproductive biology Pollination ecology Breeding system Seed ecology Adapted from: Morgan and Ronald Coleman (RC) RC Ackerman 1990 Life cycle of Yadon’s piperia: A perennial geophyte growing from a tuber SC Nov-Dec January March June-Aug Aug-Sept SC Adapted from: Wells and Cox, in Pritchard 1989 Coastal Training Program Yadon's Piperia Recovery Workshop Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve January 27, 2005 1 The Biology of Yadon's Piperia: Implications for Conservation and Management Alison Graff A year in the life of Yadon’s piperia What’s a tuber to do? Not all tubers leaf out every year. Dormancy! In similar species, tubers can remain dormant for 1 to 4 years before re-emerging (Rasmussen 1995). SC The proportion of tubers that remain dormant each February-March year can be assumed to fluctuate, but we don’t know how much. Not all tubers that leaf out in a given year will flower. Estimates in several populations have shown that 0.4% to 22% of individuals that leaf out will also SC SC SC flower in any given year. It can fluctuate wildly. June-July July-August August-September April-June In any given year a tuber can do Which numbers would you choose one of four things for a population estimate? # of tubers below ground and invisible Tubers = true population size.
    [Show full text]