EXAMINER Issue 4.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Jabez Balfour THE CASEBOOK The Cattleman, Analyses The Lunatic, The Ripper & The Doctor Murders Tom Wescott issue four October 2010 JACK THE RIPPER STUDIES, TRUE CRIME & L.V.P. SOCIAL HISTORY INTERNatIONAL MAN OF MYSTERY R J Palmer concludes his examination of Inspector Andrews D M Gates Puts his stamp GOING on the 1888 Kelly Postal POStal Directory THE CASEBOOK The contents of Casebook Examiner No. 4 October 2010 are copyright © 2010 Casebook.org. The authors of issue four signed articles, essays, letters, reviews October 2010 and other items retain the copyright of their respective contributions. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this publication, except for brief quotations where credit is given, may be repro- CONTENTS: duced, stored in a retrieval system, The Lull Before the Storm pg 3 On The Case transmitted or otherwise circulated in any form or by any means, including Subscription Information pg 5 News From Ripper World pg 120 digital, electronic, printed, mechani- On The Case Extra Behind the Scenes in America cal, photocopying, recording or any Feature Stories pg 121 R. J. Palmer pg 6 other, without the express written per- Plotting the 1888 Kelly Directory On The Case Puzzling mission of Casebook.org. The unau- D. M. Gates pg 52 Conundrums Logic Puzzle pg 128 thorized reproduction or circulation of Jabez Balfour and The Ripper Ultimate Ripperologists’ Tour this publication or any part thereof, Murders pg 65 Canterbury to Hampton whether for monetary gain or not, is & Herne Bay, Kent pg 130 strictly prohibited and may constitute The Cattleman, The Lunatic, and copyright infringement as defined in The Doctor CSI: Whitechapel Tom Wescott pg 84 Catherine Eddowes pg 138 domestic laws and international agree- From the Casebook Archives ments and give rise to civil liability and Undercover Investigations criminal prosecution. Book Reviews pg 94 James Monro pg 147 Scenes of Crime Collectors Corner The views, conclusions and opinions Whitechapel Road pg 149 Expert Advice pg 118 expressed in articles, essays, letters and other items published in Casebook Examiner are those of the authors and Editor in Chief Don Souden Editor Caroline Morris do not necessarily reflect the views, Publisher Stephen P. Ryder Acknowledgements: conclusions and opinions of Casebook. for Casebook.org Rob Clack, Jane Coram, Andrew Firth, org, Casebook Examiner or its editors. Features Editor Jennifer Shelden Suzi Hanney and Neal Shelden Design David Pegg for use of images. THE LULL BEFORE THE STORM CAROLINE MORRIS On August 22 this year, 2010, the following words appeared in a Casebook post: ‘I Don’T BELIEVE IN JacK THE RIPPER’ Back in early April, when our commu- Issue One. In with flaming June came nity traditionally remembers Emma Issue Two, when in 1888 most were Smith, the first of the Whitechapel unaware that Smith had ever shared murder victims, and flowers were their world, let alone that she had left blooming in the spring, the Examiner it in one of the foulest ways imaginable. was about to make its own debut with Whitechapel was indelicately poised on THE CASEBOOK Examiner Issue 4 October 2010 3 the edge and nobody suspected it had ago, from our point of view — Elisabeth What would we be expecting today anywhere left to fall. Stride and Catherine Eddowes had if we found ourselves in an identical Four months after Emma died their throats cut on the same night, ‘height of scare’ situation? Would we be from her horrific injuries, following within an hour of one another and a predicting a Kelly storm to hit within the senseless attack she described quarter of an hour’s walk. A few hours the month? In the next six months per- on Osborn Street, Martha Tabram previously, a letter signed ‘Jack the haps? Or would we be caught napping smashed into the high summer news- Ripper’ had reached police hands, and and unprepared for the impact? Would papers when her lifeless body was its author was claiming responsibility it be realistic to react with renewed found stabbed repeatedly in an almost for the bloodshed. Whoever took the horror, but with little doubt that this unprecedented fashion, just a few lives of these women now had a name was more of the same phenomenon, as seconds’ walk away in George Yard, of sorts, if no face to put to it. we did when the fifth woman to dis- Gunthorpe Street. It was in the wake Blessed with the exact science appear from Ipswich’s red light area of our thoughts going out to Tabram of hindsight, you will have guessed was found murdered? Or is there good that the August issue of the Examiner that Mary Kelly’s untimely end is reason to be sceptical of that tiny room appeared, and just a couple of weeks the unknown storm to come. But is in Miller’s Court staging a repeat per- before Polly Nichols would make it a there a need in this day and age, so formance by someone who had killed Whitechapel murder hat trick — or far removed from the event, to down- several times already this year? How jolly bonnet trick if we can trust the grade it from the most damaging would we be making sense of it this anecdote. hurricane of the season, the decade time round, if it were happening all Issue Four now finds us slap-bang or even the century, to an unexpect- over again in the here and now? in the middle of saucy Jacky’s supposed edly violent gust from a different Dear reader, if you can put your- gap month, the October lull before the direction entirely? If so, is this in line self in this position, with more than November storm. Much has happened with current understanding of serial a century’s worth of murder, serial or since the beginning of September: murder and murderers in general, or otherwise, to fire your imagination or Annie Chapman joined Nichols in more the result of frustrated efforts leave it jaded and uninspired, what do murder history, having met her killer to wring anything more illuminating you see before you? Do you believe in the very next weekend; then three from the same facts they had to face Jack the Ripper this mid-October? weekends later — or a mere fortnight 122 years ago? The Lull Before the Storm Caroline Morris DON’T MISS A SINglE GREat ISSUE OF CASEBOOK EXAMINER SUBSCRIBE NOW FOR A WHOLE YEAR SIX BIG ISSUES! FOR ONLY For less than a night at the movies or a And remember, you will not$9 only be Go to WWW .CASEBOOK .ORG /EXAMINE R dyspeptic dinner for two at a fast-food getting the best in JtR fact and fiction, for full subscription details. restaurant you will get a year’s worth along with LVP true crime and social of informative articles, entertaining history articles, but the money will be features and all the exciting news in going to a suitable charity. A winning the field. combination that can’t be beat. THE CASEBOOK Examiner Issue 4 October 2010 5 Inspector Andrews Revisited part three: Behind the Scenes in America R.J.PalmER hen we last left Inspector at Euston Station — an oddity that the ‘Canadian phase’ of Tumblety’s Walter Andrews, he had would be reported in the press the career was seemingly thirty years in Wsailed from Liverpool same day that Tumblety’s gross inde- the past and very far removed indeed aboard the S.S.Sarnia en route to cency case leaked from a source inside from Whitechapel; further, contempo- Halifax, Nova Scotia, landing there London’s Central Criminal Court.1 rary sources offer an alternative expla- on December 9th, 1888. His prisoner, The timing of Andrews’ voyage was nation for Andrews’ mission: he was Roland Barnett, was in tow. highly suggestive, particularly since he actually crossing the ocean to hunt The arrangements for Andrews’ would later be named as one of three up witnesses for The Times’ “Parnell” trip to North America had been finalized Scotland Yard detective-inspectors Commission in London. on or around November 27th, following called in to assist in the Whitechapel Complicating matters was that a week where Scotland Yard had been Murder investigation. Yet, as we have strange and enigmatic figure that soliciting at least two American police also seen, modern critics have chal- haunts the center of the Ripper case: departments about the antecedents lenged any notion that Andrews’ trip Dr. Robert Anderson. It was Anderson of Francis Tumblety. Of considerable had anything to do with Tumblety, and who was ultimately responsible for the interest is that these negotiations to it is fair to admit that their two stron- detection (or ‘non-detection’) of ‘Jack send Andrews to Canada had begun on gest objections remain. Yes, Andrews the Ripper,’ and it was Anderson who November 19th — only three days after was on his way to Canada, but, by 1888, orchestrated Andrews’ voyage to North Tumblety had managed to make bail, 1 In an article appearing in the current issue of The America. It was Anderson, too, who had and only two days after an ‘American Whitechapel Journal, Joe Chetcuti contends that the telegraphed the United States, asking doctor’ had been picked up on suspicion Euston suspect was, in fact, Francis Tumblety. for more information about Tumblety. THE CASEBOOK Examiner Issue 4 October 2010 6 Following a month of startling revela- tions, it was whispered that Andrews met with Thomas Miller Beach while in North America — in other words, that Scotland Yard had been in col- lusion with The Times. Andrews, it seems, had allowed himself to become a pawn in a political game.