<<

Axiomatic Foundations of Ryan Melton Dr. Clint Richardson, Faculty Advisor Stephen F. Austin State University As once said, Gödel's Method is the subject in which we Consider the expression First, Gödel assigned a unique natural to

do not know what we are talking about, or 2 + 3 = 5 each of the logical symbols and . whether what we are saying is true. Russell’s begs from us one major This expression is mathematical; it belongs to the field For example: if the '0' corresponds to we call and is composed of basic arithmetic question: the 1, '+' to 2, and '=' to 3, then symbols. '0 = 0' '0 + 0 = 0' What is Mathematics founded on? On the other hand, the sentence and

'2 + 3 = 5' is an arithmetical formula. 1 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 so each expression corresponds to a sequence. and Systems is metamathematical; it is constructed outside of mathematics and labels the expression above as a Then, for this new sequence x x x …x of formula in arithmetic. 1 2 3 n An axiom is a belief taken without , and positive , we associate a Gödel number thus an axiom system is a of beliefs as follows: x1 x2 x3 xn taken without proof. enc( x1x2x3...xn ) = 2 3 5 ... pn Since was such a bold where the encoding is the product of n factors, Consistent? Complete? leap in the right direction--although proving each of which is found by raising the j-th prime nothing about --several attempts at to the xj power. An axiom system is: proving consistency were made by other ---consistent if no valid statement in the of the time, the most notable of Thus, '0 = 0' corresponds to 1, 3, 1 is both provably true and provably these was… which is encoded as 1 3 1 . Kurt Gödel! 2 3 5 = 270 ---complete if each valid statement in the and theory is provably true or provably false. Kurt Gödel (1906 - 1978) '0 + 0 = 0' corresponds to 1, 2, 1, 3, 1 was a German logician, which is encoded as The Issue and a personal friend of 21 32 51 73 111 = 339,570. Einstein. As a refugee Can an be both from the Nazi Party, By the Fundamental of Arithmetic, Gödel fled to the United consistent and complete? this representation as a product of powers of States, and came to the primes is unique. Institute of Advanced Study in New Jersey.

The answer (first attempt): There, he proceeded to develop a fascinating Thus, any formula can be uniquely represented Principia Mathematica! proof that would amaze all who were struggling as a Gödel number, and any given Gödel with a solution to consistency. number can be used to produce the original The NEW Issue formula. At its heart, Gödel's hinges on the This allowed Gödel to show a correspondence following question: However, according to Principia between statements about natural numbers and

Mathematica, the consistency of a given statements about the provability of Can be discussed system relies on the consistency of formal in the context of mathematics? about natural numbers; this the key observation itself. of the proof. That is, Ultimately, metamathematics could be Thus, we (still) know NOTHING about addressed in the context of arithmetic! consistency! Can you speak ABOUT mathematics WITH mathematics? What is Metamathematics? CONCLUSION Gödel's final result was the fact that no According to Hilbert, metamathematics is axiom system that could support arithmetic the ABOUT mathematics. Goldstein, Rebecca. Incompleteness: The Proof and of Kurt Gödel. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2005. Print. could be both consistent and complete. Nagel, Ernest and James Newman. Gödel's Proof. New York: New York University Metamathematical statements are Press, 2001. Print. Weisstein, Eric W. "Complete Axiomatic Theory." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Thus, consistency and cannot statements about the signs occuring within a Resource 3 Mar 2010. Web. 20 Mar 2010. formalized mathematical system. Weisstein, Eric W. "Consistency." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. 3 Mar 2010. coexist within the foundations of axiomatic Web. 20 Mar 2010. mathematics. However, the goal is to understand that foundation.