2016 Final PNASH Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 5 Introduction Accomplishments II. CENTER OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... 12 Introduction Relevance New and Future Directions III. ADMINISTRATIVE AND PLANNING CORE Administrative and Planning .................................................................................................. 14 Evaluation Program ............................................................................................................... 20 Outreach and Education Program ......................................................................................... 23 IV. CENTER PROJECTS Research Core Christopher Simpson Measurement of Farmworker OP Exposure through Protein Adducts ................................. 29 Michael Yost Using IPM to Reduce Pyrethroid Pesticide Exposures in Dairy Workers .............................. 33 June Spector Pilot Study of Risk Factors for Heat-Related Illness in Agricultural Workers ........................ 37 Prevention/Intervention Core Richard Fenske Reducing Agricultural Worker Risks through New and Emerging Technologies ................... 42 Pete Johnson Ergonomic Evaluation of Emerging Technologies in the Tree Fruit Industry ........................ 48 Kent Anger & Diane Rohlman (Co-PIs) Pilot Impact of a Total Worker Health® Intervention on Workplace Stress .......................... 53 in Farmworkers Arnold de Castro Pilot Assessment of Agricultural Safety and Health Among Hmong Farmers ....................... 58 Education/Translation Core Nadine Lehrer & Kit Galvin (Co-PIs) Pesticide Safety in Tree Fruit: Translating Research, Overcoming Barriers .......................... 62 PACIFIC NORTHWEST AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER | Final Report, 2011-2016 1 Feasibility Project Program (small projects funded annually) Catherine Karr Feasibility 1: Reducing Occupational Health and Safety Risks among .................................. 69 Young Workers in Agriculture through Clinician Engagement Diane Rohlman Feasibility 2: Development of a Work Stress Survey for Farmworkers ................................. 70 Jeffery Bethel Feasibility 3: Risk Factors for Heat-Related Illness among Oregon Farmworkers ................. 71 Susan Searles Nielson Feasibility 4: Parkinsonism among Washington State Agricultural Pesticide Handlers ........ 72 Peter Rabinowitz Feasibility 5: Transmission of Microorganisms in Dairy Farms ............................................. 73 Gabriel Garcia Feasibility 6: Understanding the Effects of Filipino Migrant and Immigrant ........................ 74 Workers in the Fishing Industry Alexandra Lewis-Lorenz Feasibility 7: GRAS2P Food Safety Video ............................................................................... 75 Debra Cherry Feasibility 8: Total Worker Health in Salmon Fishermen from Cordova, Alaska ................... 76 Laurel Kincl Feasibility 9: Nonfatal Injuries among Commercial Fishing Workers in Alaska, ................... 77 Washington, and Oregon Nancy Simcox Feasibility 10: Agricultural Medicine eLearning Series for Mid-Level Health ....................... 78 Care Providers Michael Yost Feasibility 11: Injury and Illness Surveillance in the Pacific Northwest for the Dairy Industry 79 Victoria Breckwich Vásquez 12 Feasibility: Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Video ................................................... 80 V. ADDITIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS PNASH Students 2011-2016 .................................................................................................. 83 Additional Grant-funded Projects.......................................................................................... 86 Other Related PNASH Publications ........................................................................................ 93 APPENDICES Appendix A. Acronyms and Terminology Appendix B. Project Logic Models Appendix C. Project Cumulative Enrollment Tables Appendix D. Invention Report (Anger & Rohlman) PACIFIC NORTHWEST AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER | Final Report, 2011-2016 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was only accomplished through active collaborations with state agencies, industry leaders, worker communities, and health care providers. Thank you for your partnership and honest advice. We cannot name most of these contributors, due to research participation confidentiality, but the work here presented for PNASH’s 2011-2016 cycle, is the result of cooperation of over 1,000 organizations and individuals throughout the Pacific Northwest. Moreover, we are proud of our faculty, staff and students who have contributed to a growing body of expertise and impact in agricultural safety and health. The PNASH Center celebrated its 20th anniversary in 2016. Throughout the past 20 years, we have built an organizational foundation and made substantive impacts on areas with a high burden of injury and disease for producers, workers and their families. This report represents the great and continuing effort of PNASH people and partners in conducting research ‘for healthy workers, strong communities and productive agriculture.’ PACIFIC NORTHWEST AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER | Final Report, 2011-2016 3 SUMMARY EXE CUTIVE PACIFIC NORTHWEST AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER | Final Report, 2011-2016 4 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Pacific Northwest Agricultural Safety and Health (PNASH) Center is dedicated to the prevention of illness and injury among agricultural producers, workers and their families. One of ten regional centers, PNASH serves Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington, integrating expertise from multiple disciplines, institutions and community partners. The Center is focused on safe and sustainable agricultural workplaces and communities with an emphasis on injury and illness prevention, especially among hired laborers, migrant/seasonal workers, and children. Our approach includes: ° Working in partnership with employers, workers, agencies and other research and service organizations. ° Conducting innovative research and intervention programs that focus on problem solving. ° Taking solutions to the workplace through training, outreach, and participatory research. PNASH’s 2011-2016 funding cycle marks our 20th anniversary and a research portfolio only possible through a strong foundation of partnerships and trust among the agricultural industries and communities we work with. At the beginning of this cycle, our Center personnel formed a tagline to reflect our mission and values: This executive summary highlights some key outcomes and findings from our 2011-2016 projects and programs, yet we invite you to dig deeper. Each project spans a large body of work with current and pending scholarly publications, educational products, or internal technical reports. These may contribute to your work, so please contact us with any questions or interests in collaborating. Most important to our mission is ensuring that these results impact practice in the field. PNASH ORGANIZATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS The research accomplishments presented here reflect the organizational success of PNASH and that of our teams of faculty, staff and students. A core of 12 fulltime staff worked closely with over 30 faculty, 53 students and 8 regional institutional subawards to Washington State University, Oregon Health Sciences University, Oregon State University and the University of Alaska. Over 14 communities were engaged throughout the Northwest, and, due to the importance of the Yakima Valley to regional agriculture, PNASH maintains a field office and staff based in Yakima, WA. This cycle saw tremendous growth for PNASH and the scope of our work, with more projects selected for funding through NIOSH’s Agricultural, Forestry and Fishing program, several new large projects awarded by NIH to Dr. Catherine Karr and many small projects supported through state awards. Overall, PNASH had 34 projects in the 2011-2016 cycle. This success in grant funding was only possible due to the foundational funding of the NIOSH Agricultural Center award, multidisciplinary collaboration, stakeholder support, and organizational and personnel capacity of the PNASH Center. PACIFIC NORTHWEST AGRICULTURAL SAFETY AND HEALTH CENTER | Final Report, 2011-2016 5 ENGAGEMENT OF REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS AND PARTNERS A priority of the PNASH Center in this last funding cycle has been our engagement with stakeholders in the region. We have built upon previous stakeholder engagement activities, identified gaps, and worked systematically to address the challenges presented to us by stakeholders. Employers and Producers. Engagement with employers and producers in health and safety problem-solving is a strength of our Center and has proven to be an effective strategy for creating safer workplaces. We have had direct collaboration with agricultural producers and with equipment manufacturers in the ergonomic evaluation of mobile platforms in orchards (Johnson project). In addition, we formed a technical advisory group that included employers and WSU extension faculty to ensure that our research was directly relevant to the needs of the producer community. We also have strong cooperation with the industry-sponsored WA Tree Fruit Research Commission and with WSU in our studies of new technologies to minimize pesticide drift (Fenske project). In the dissemination of our Practical