The Royal Family and the War

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Royal Family and the War CHAPTER CCLXV. THE ROYAL FAMILY AND THE WAR. THE SOVEREIGN AND "THE FORCES OF THE CROWN "-QUEEN VICTORIA-KING EDWARD AND FOREJGN AFFAIRS-KING GEORGE IN 1914-THE KING'S DAy-VISITS TO THE FRONT-A MEMORY OF CRECy-THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR-ROYAL VISITS TO MUNITION WORKS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTRES-THE KING AND THE NAVy-THE PRINCE OF -VVALES AS A SOLDIER-THE QUEEN'S UNTIRING WORK-THE THRONE IN 1918. HAT were the King and the Royal our old antagonist, was never broken, though Family doing during the Great War? it was often strained, and we had no share W What were the relations between His either in the American Civil War or in the Majesty and his people, his Army, three wars by which Bismarck made the and his Navy? How did he regard his duty, German Empire. Still less broken on the how did he perform it, and how were his surface was the reign of King Edward, whom efforts regarded at the front and in the country? the popular voice named "Peacemaker." How far did the young Princes do their share Soon after his accession the Boer War came to and the Queen and Princesses take a lead in an end; and from the date of the Peace of that multifarious war-work which, in the Vereeniging (May 31, 1902) to that of the hands of women, wa~ one of the wonders of King's lamented death in 1910, England was the country and th~ world? free from war altogether. Before speaking of King George in his What was the c,onstitutional position of relation to the Army, it will be well to look the Sovereign with regard to the Army and back upon some of the military and naval fea­ Navy during these reigns, and did it continue tures of the two preceding reigns. Both were unchanged? The answer is indicated with .in the main periods of peace, periods indeed of sufficient accuracy in the common description profound peace as compared with the period of these arms as "The Forces of the Crown." 'which closed in 1815 and that which began in It is indeed 'rather curious that, while we had 1914, though Queen Victoria had to face three for centuries possessed a "Royal" Navy, and serious wars-Crimeal India in 1857, and while our latest armed body was, during the South Africa-while "little wars" against Great War , officially nam.ed the Royal Air turbulent neighbours were a frequent and Force, we had no " Royal" Army. The omission perhaps inseparable accident of the rapid of the epithet is doubtless to be tr~ced to far­ growth of the Empire. But notwithstanding away historical causes, and is the outcome of the unhappy quarrel with Russia in 1854, that jealousy of standing armies which found England and her rulers passed safely through formal expression in the Bill of Rights (1689), many foreign storms and over many quick­ and remained a characteristic of Parliament sands. The peace between us and France, since the seventeenth century. The Bill of Vol. XVIII.-Part 225. 109 110 THE TIMES HISTORY OF THE WAR. Rights declared that "the raising or keeping 1870-71 the spectacle of the Franco-German. of a standing Army within the Kingdom, " Tar stimulated Cardwell's reforms, did the­ unless it be by the consent of Parliament, is Duke's antiquated principles find it easy to against the law"; in other words, Parliament give way. At last, in 1895, public opinion must authorize the creation of the Army which grew too strong and too vocal, and the Duke,. Parliament was to pay. Still, though the then 76 years old, consulted the Queen as to· 'power of the purse always rested with Parlia- whether he should retire. She reluctantly, but ment, and though the organization of the Army, . very wisely, advised him to do so; and a Chief especially after Cardwell's reforms, ultimately whose fairness, industry, and devotion to his depended on a Parliamentary Secretary of work were universally recognized, made way State, no one ever seriously disputed that the for men more alive to the vital necessities of tjtular command belongs to the Crown. As the times. Lord Wolsel'ey wrote in 1887:< ;, From time Though, as has b;en said, the reign of King. immemorial the Sovereign has been the head Edward was a period of peace, it was marked of our Army, and it will be a bad day for by considerable efforts towards the strengthen ­ England should this ever be changed." "Com - , ing of both the land and the sea forces. New mand, preferment, and honour come to the types of ships were built-Dreadnoughts and Army from the Crown," says a great lawyer; super-Dreadnoughts, battle-cruisers and de­ and such remained the legal position. Queen stroyers, for the torpedo was assuming the­ Victoria was always jealous of her military importance which the Great War so amply rights. She was fond of the Army. She was proved. Two great naval reviews in the­ surrotmded by officers, all of them well schooled Solent, one of them held in honour ot the in military etiquette. She was fond of re­ Emperor of Russia, were held by the King, calling the fact that she was a "soldier's and showed to all the world that the British daughter" -for the Duke of Kent had been a Fleet was more powerful than ever. In 1907 General and Field-Marshal, and had been in Mr. Haldane, who, as Secretary of State for military command in Canada and at Gibraltar. War, profited greatly by the wisdom of King Her hiographer calls her love for the soldiers Edward, brought forward and carried his. "a dominant sentiment." scheme for the creation, of a Territorial Army In one matter Queen Victoria carried on a county basis.. In October the King her regard for her Royal prerogative further summoned the Lords-Lieutenant to Bucking­ than military, or indeed national, opinion ham Palace, and addressed them in an aI,limated! justified. This was in her appointment of speech, pointing out that the new Act would her cousin, the Duke of Cambridge, as Com.­ revive much of the importance formerly mander-in-Chief, and in her maintaining him belonging to their office. The Territorial> in the post-altered, modified, and extended Force was intended for home defence;· from time to time-for 40 years. The side by side with it there was patiently tnuy scandalous state of the Army, m developed that Expeditionary Force of six respect both of military equipment and of Divisions of Regulars which, when the fated general organization, was cruelly revealed by lTIOment came, was transported to France­ the blunders and failures of the Crimean " Tar; "without a single casualty," an,d stemmed' let us do justice to the memory of the Queen's the first German rush. These were the husband, the Prince Consort, and freely admit Divisions of which Marshal Foch said that .hat he, perhaps more than any .single man, they were" the finest troops" that he petsonally· helped to bring about essential reforms. But had ever seen. neither then nor later did the Duke of Cam­ King Edward died on May 6, 1910, and three­ bridge heartily recognize their necessity. Again, days later his only surviving son was pro­ when the Volunteer movement was brought claimed King under the title of George V. into being, Prince Albert actually drafted the The first four years of his reign hardly concern "Instnlctions to Lords-Lieutenant," issued in us here, but one cannot pass them by without May, 1859, which were the regulations on which the reflection, qtw,ntula sapientia r-egitur or-bis the Volunteer forge was raised and organized. terTaTum. We now know that we, our country, The Duke of Cambridge, however, was always our Empire, nay, civilization itself, was on the­ doubtful as to the utility of a civilian army of slopes of a volcano; that threatening, ull.ll1is­ this type; nor, eleven years later, when in takable murmurs were clearly audible; anCL • TH E Tll\1E8 HISTORY OF THE WAR. 111 FUNERAL OF QUEEN VICTORIA LEAVING WINDSOR CASTLE FOR THE ROYAL MAUSOLEUM AT FROGMORE. yet we passed our time less in prepari. ng result was the persuasion in t he m inds of t h8 for the storm than in quarr elling with one Kaiser and his Generals t hat civil war in ' another. For those were t he years of the Ireland was impending, and t hat England angry disputes between Lords and Commons, would at least have her hands full if t he first ab out the Parliament Bill, and then, Central Powers attacked France and Russia. when it became an Act, about its application The issues of peace and war are closely to the problem of Irish Government. One related to the direction. of a n ation's foreign 225-2 112 THE :TIMES HISTORY OF THE WAR. pplicy, and it is necessary to re fer briefly to it was especially so in the case of the famom; the part taken by Queen Victoria and King despatch to Washington on the occasion of the Edward in regard to the foreign relations of Trent affair, which Prince Albert, already the country. Both fully accepted the principle, struck by mortal illness, strengthened, rewrote which had been ~aining ground ever since the in his own hand, and easily persuaded the Queen fall of Napoleon, that the ideal policy for to sign. That dispatch, with its combination England was a policy of non-intervention, of firmness and sOl.md argument, undoubtedly and it is to ' her desire of sa~~guarding this averted the very serious danger of war.
Recommended publications
  • Charles Bruce Gear Born: 23 Aug 1883 Brough, Nesting, Died: 1 Jan 1915 at Sea Seaman in the Royal Navy, Royal Naval Reserve, H.M.S
    Charles Bruce Gear Born: 23 Aug 1883 Brough, Nesting, Died: 1 Jan 1915 At sea Seaman in the Royal Navy, Royal Naval Reserve, H.M.S. "Formidable." Service no: B 4626. Awarded 1915 Star, British War Medal and Victory Medal. Father: Magnus GEAR, b. 1844, Brough, Nesting, d. 1938, Aberdeen, (Age 94 years) Mother: Charlotte WILLIAMSON, b. 1848, Catfirth, Nesting, d. 19 Feb 1926, Brough, Nesting, SHI, SCT (Age 78 years) Married: 10 Jan 1871 Nesting. HMS Formidable, the third of four ships of that name to serve in the Royal Navy, was the lead ship of her class of predreadnought battleships. Commissioned in 1904, she served initially with the Mediterranean Fleet, transferring to the Channel Fleet in 1908. In 1912, she was assigned to the 5th Battle Squadron, which was stationed at Nore. Following the outbreak of World War I, the squadron conducted operations in the English Channel, and was based at Sheerness to guard against a possible German invasion. Despite reports of submarine activity, early in the morning of 1 January 1915, whilst on exercise in the English Channel, Formidable sank after being hit by two torpedoes. She was the second British battleship to be sunk by enemy action during the First World War. Technical characteristics: HMS Formidable was laid down at Portsmouth Dockyard on 21 March 1898 and launched on 17 November 1898. She was completed in September 1901, but due to difficulties with machinery contractors her readiness for service was delayed, and she was not commissioned for another three years. Formidable had the same-calibre armament and was similar in appearance to the Majestic and Canopus classes that preceded her.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 1
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. A debate exists whether a ‘Second Cold War’ did in fact break out or whether this merely a changing phase of the ongoing Cold War. This changing situation in East-West relations from the late 1970s onwards will henceforth, be referred to as the Second Cold War. See, for example, Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (London: Verso Editions and NLB, second edition, 1986). 2. Private discussions. In 1979 only 2 per cent of the electorate thought defence was a major issue in the election. By 1983 this had risen to 38 per cent. Michael Heseltine, ‘The United Kingdom’s Strategic Interests and Priorities’, RUSI Journal, vol. 128, no. 4, December 1983, pp. 3–5, p. 3. The 1983 election campaign was noteworthy for the action of the previous Labour Prime Minister, James Callaghan, who took the unprecedented step of repudiating his own party’s defence policy; Ian Aitken, ‘Callaghan Wrecks Polaris Repairs’, Guardian, 26 May 1983; Peter M. Jones, ‘British Defence Policy: the Breakdown of the Inter-party Consensus’, Review of International Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, April 1987, pp. 111–31; Bruce George and Curt Pawlisch, ‘Defence and 1983 Election’, ADIU Report, vol. 5, no. 4, July/August 1983, p. 2; Michael Heseltine, Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2000), p. 250. 3. Peter Calvocoressi, ‘Deterrence, the Costs, the Issues, the Choices’, Sunday Times, 6 April 1980. 4. Nicholas J. Wheeler, ‘Perceptions of the Soviet Threat’, in British Security Policy: the Thatcher Years and the End of the Cold War, edited by Stuart Croft (London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991), p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life-Boat
    THE LIFE-BOAT, OB JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL LIFE-BOAT INSTITUTION. [PRICE 2». VOL* . Ill—No. 25.J] JULY IST, 1857. fact, to live; and the tears of weeping THE. RESTORATION OF PERSONS relatives and friends are turned to joy.' APPARENTLY DROWNED. It is, indeed, a privilege to be permitted WHAT member is there of any Christian to take any part in the promotion of so community who has not meditated, with grand a work; proportionally anxious, how- feelings of reverential and grateful emotion, ever, must those feel who are engaged in on the miraculous restoration to life of it to possess themselves with an accurate LAZARUS after he had been dead four days ? knowledge of the most certain means with Who is there that has not pictured to him- which to effect their important under- self the pathetic interview between the two taking. sisters and our SAVIOOE on that memorable The NATIONAL LIFE-BOAT INSTITUTION, occasion ? Who is there whose thoughts although its more immediate function is have not travelled backward through die the provision of means to rescue the ship- long ages that have since passed away, and wrecked mariner and convey him safely tc rejoiced with those favoured women on the the land, is yet frequently, in its pursuit of return of one so dear to them, whom they that function, brought into contact with had mourned over as for ever removed from persons partially drowned. Accordingly, their earthly view ? at its numerous life-boat stations, it has had Such miraculous power is not deputed to posted up in the boat-houses those instruc- mortal man! yet there are cases where the tions for the treatment of seemingly-drowned physician, by the skilful use of the means persons which have been supposed to be which GOD has placed in his hands, pro- the most appropriate, which instructions are duces effects of a strikingly analogous cha- often the only guide of the persons called racter ; where all the functions of life have on' to assist, until medical aid can be ob- ceased; where the heart is still, and the tained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the Royal National Life-Boat Institution
    THE LIFE-BOAT. The Journal of the Royal National Life-boat Institution. VOL. XXXI. JUNE, 1939. No. 338. THE LIFE-BOAT FLEET Motor Life-boats, 145 :: Pulling & Sailing Life-boats, 17 LIVES RESCUED from the foundation of the Institution in 1824 to 15th June, 1939 66,237 The Duke of Kent's Presidential Address A Record Year. tragedies it does, and does at once. I AM sorry to say that we meet to-day From the day of the disaster at St. under the shadow of two disasters. Ives it pensioned the widows, children Just three months ago the motor life- and other dependent relatives of the boat at St. Ives went out in the middle seven men, as if those men had been of the night in a gale of exceptional sailors, soldiers or airmen killed in severity. She capsized, and was action. In the case of the men of washed up on the rocks with only one Cullercoats, it will do the same. man of her crew of eight alive. Many of us here to-day must feel that tragedy 3,500 Lives Saved—One Lost. almost as a personal loss, for Coxswain Such disasters remind us of the perils Cocking and four others of those seven which are always present round our men of St., Ives were with us on the coasts. When the St. Ives life-boat platform just a year ago to receive capsized it was just ten years since the medals for gallantry. disaster at Rye Harbour, which was the last major accident involving the A Second Disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine of HMS Fisgard 1982
    H.M.S. INVINCIBLE PORTRAIT OF THE YEAR OFFICERS JOINING OFFICERS LEAVING Father BESTER Lt BRADY Lt Cdr CADD Lt Cdr BROTHERS Lt CHANDLER Father BESTER Lt COVERDALE Lt BENNISON Lt CROWHURST Lt Cdr BAXENDALE Lt EASTAUGH Lt BATES Lt LEA Lt Cdr CHAPMAN Lt MEALOR Lt CHAPPLE Lt NETHERCOTT Lt DOIDGE Lt POWELL Lt Cdr EDMUNDS Lt PANCOTT Lt HAYDEN Lt Cdr PRICE Lt Cdr JONES Lt PETTY Lt Cdr KEENAN Lt ROSE Lt Cdr LEWIS Lt RUEL Lt Cdr LUPTON 1/0 STELLINGWORTH Lt MARSHALL Lt SHIELDS Lt MEEHAN Lt Cdr WALTERS Lt RICHARDSON Lt ROBINSON 2/0 SHEPHERD Lt Cdr SUTTON Lt WARING Lt WILL Lt YOUNG 1/0 YOUNG VIP VISITORS Admiral Sir Desmond CASSIDI (Second Sea Lord) Reverend P PRICE (Principal Church of Scotland and Free Church Chaplain) Commodore ES COUMBE (Director General, Weapons (Naval) ) The Right Reverend Brother MICHAEL (Bishop of St GERMANS) Admiral Sir James EBERLE (Commander-in-Chief, Naval Home Command) Captain JR OSWALD (Captain, BRNC DARTMOUTH) Captain GGW MARSH (Captain, RNEC MANADON) Vice Admiral Sir William PILLAR (Commandant, Royal College of Defence Studies) Rear Admiral TOK SPRAGGS (Chief of Staff to CNH) Rear Admiral RA HARCUS (Retired) Captain J JACOBSEN (Captain, HMS RALEIGH) Captain J BURGESS (Captain, HMS DEFIANCE) Captain BR OUTHWAITE (Captain, HMS RALEIGH) Commodore MF SIMPSON (Commodore, HMS NELSON) The Right Reverend Peter MUMFORD (Bishop of TRURO) The Venerable RH ROBERTS (Chaplain of the Fleet) Captain GAFR HITCHENS (Captain, HMS DEFIANCE) Surgeon Rear Admiral RJW LAMBERT (Surgeon Rear-Admiral, Ships and Establishments) Captain F BOWEN (Captain, HMS COLLINGWOOD) Admiral Sir John FIELDHOUSE (Commander-in-Chief, Fleet) FISGARD The Magazine of H.M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Under Thatcher
    Defence under Thatcher Andrew M. Dorman Foreword by Michael Clarke Southampton Studies in International Policy Published in association with the Mountbatten Centre for International Studies, University of Southampton General Editor: Dilys M. Hill Other academic members of the editorial board: Ralph Beddard, John Oldfield, Kendrick Oliver, John Simpson This series was established in 1986 to encourage the publication of multi- disciplinary studies of those public policies with significant international com- ponents or implications. Areas of special interest include arms control and defence policies, environmental policies, human rights, maritime and space issues, Third World development questions and the European Union. Selected titles: Lisbeth Aggestam and Arian Hyde-Price (editors) SECURITY AND IDENTITY IN EUROPE Exploring the New Agenda Wyn Q. Bowen THE POLITICS OF BALLISTIC MISSILE NONPROLIFERATION Andrew Dorman DEFENCE UNDER THATCHER David H. Dunn THE POLITICS OF THREAT Minutemen Vulnerability in American National Security Policy Tony Evans US HEGEMONY AND THE PROJECT OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS Paul S. Herrnson and Dilys M. Hill (editors) THE CLINTON PRESIDENCY The First Term, 1992–96 Dilys M. Hill, Raymond A. Moore and Phil Williams (editors) THE REAGAN PRESIDENCY An Incomplete Revolution? Dilys M. Hill and Phil Williams (editors) THE BUSH PRESIDENCY Triumphs and Adversities Mark F. Imber THE USA, ILO, UNESCO AND IAEA Politicization and Withdrawal in the Specialized Agencies John Simpson and Darryl Howlett (editors) THE FUTURE OF THE NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY Joanna Spear CARTER AND ARMS SALES Antonio Varsori (editor) EUROPE, 1945–1990s The End of an Era? Southampton Studies in International Policy Series Standing Order ISBN 0–333–71493–8 (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order.
    [Show full text]
  • New Tax Package Shapes up in State
    DIAL SH I-OOIO " 1 .n«ut* 'VOL. 85, NO. 222 »T omen. RED BANK, N. J., tfRIDAY, MAY 3, 1963 7c PER COPY PAGE ONE Name Red Bank Zip-Code Center RED BANK - TWi borough )• among «j(l p postal employees will be able to immediately determine that ties detigntted u "sectional centers" - foal Mitt tt (h* mill la destined for Red Bank sectional center. When it ar- New Tax Package 'Pott Office Department's revolutionary JHp-C«fe mill '•ys- rives here, by glancing at the last two digits, our sectional tem tobe unveiled July l, Postmaster Fred A. CfMt fab baa center people will know exactly what town, and what neigh- advised I^Po*tniaster General J.EdwardDay. " barhood the letter goes to.v "Red Bank wai chosen u a •ecUonal center to the Na- The five dl£KJZip-Code (Zoning Improvement Plan) num- ttooal Zip-Code program because it serves a* * main focal bers *» being assigned throughout the country, and will be point of air, highway and rill-transportation in tfris immedi- Available July 1. \ ate vicinity," Postmaster Crlne said. , Applied during Addressing and presorting of large vol- Shapes Up in State ume mail by electronic data processing equipment, used by Hi* SM sectional center* designated nttlonally will play mailers, the Zip-Code numbers will- speed mail service a toy role In the National Zip-Code scheme — ft plan by throughout the country by bypassing several manual sorta- TRENTON (AP)-A new $34.7 which fivtwUgit codes will speed mail deliveries. In some tions. million tax package that features cases by as much as 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Composition of the Territorial Air Force 1930
    The Territorial Air Force 1925-1957 – Officer Recruitment and Class Appendix 2 FRANCES LOUISE WILKINSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2017 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Frances Louise Wilkinson to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature……………………………………….. Date…………………………………………….. Appendix Contents Pages Appendix 1 Officers of the reformed RAuxAF 4-54 Appendix 2 Officers commissioned into the RAuxAF With no squadron number given 55-61 Appendix 3 United Kingdom Officers of the Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve 62-179 3 Officers of the Re-formed Royal Auxiliary Air Force 1946-1957 The following appendix lists the officers of the Royal Auxiliary Air Force by squadron. The date of commission has been obtained by using www.gazette-online.co.uk and searching the archive for each squadron. Date of commission data is found in the Supplements to the London Gazette for the date given. Where material has been found from other press records, interviews, books or the internet, this has been indicated in entries with a larger typeface.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of Monday, Ist February 1982 Lip Gutyoritp
    No. 48879 1401 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette of Monday, ist February 1982 lip gutyoritp Registered as a Newspaper TUESDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY 1982 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NAVY DEPARTMENT SPECIAL DUTIES LIST Lt. Cdr. J. J. RIGGS, reverts to Retired List 13th Feb. 2nd February 1982. 1982 on ceasing to be re-employed. ROYAL NAVY Lt. (Actg. Lt Cdr.) D. E. HANCOCK, to Retired List 4th Feb. 1982 (granted rank of Lt Cdr. (Hon.)). Surgeon Captain J. Cox, O.B.E., has been appointed Lts. transferred to General List 1st Jan. 1982 with Honorary Surgeon to The QUEEN from 12th February seny. 1st Jan. 1977: 1982 in succession to Surgeon Captain P. W. MEAD, C. J. HOLGATE. O.B.E., Q.H.S. C. W. FlANDER. Actg. Sub Lts. to be Sub Lt. 22nd Sep. 1981 with GENERAL LIST seny. 22nd Sep. 1980: G. L. HAMPSTEAD. Vice-Admiral Sir William PILLAR, K.C.B., to be Admiral with seny. 5th Jan. 1982. R. S. SMITH. Cdr. P. E. THREADINGHAM, to Retired List (own request), 13th Feb. 1982. SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Lt Cdr. P. B. MILES, to Retired List 6th Feb. 1982 (granted rank of Cdr. (Hon.)). Lt. A. D. CROSSLEY, transferred to Medium Career Com- mission 1st Nov. 1981 with seny. 1st May 1975. Lt Cdr. W. D. GLADSTONE, to Retired List, 7th Feb. 1982. CAREERS SERVICE (R.N.) MEDICAL BRANCH Lt T. GILCHRIST, to Retired List, llth Feb. 1982. Surgeon Captain (Actg. Surgeon Commodore) E, E. P. BARNARD, Q.H.P., to be Surgeon Rear Admiral with seny. 3rd Feb. 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Run: the Royal Canadian Navy and the Battle for the Convoys Reviewed by Lcdr Patrick Smithers
    Maritime Engineering Journal SPRING 2007 (Established 1982) DEPARTMENTS Commodore’s Corner Sustainable solutions are the key to effective operational support by Commodore Richard Greenwood .............................................................. 2 Forum: A Canadian Common Surface Warship Concept by LCdr Bruce Grychowski ............................................................................ 3 FEATURES Machinery Repair: Step-by-step Repair of a Main Gearbox Lube Oil Supply Line in HMCS Ville de Québec by Bob Steeb ................................................................................................... 7 Director General Maritime Equipment Program Management TML — A Technology Maturity Level Measurement System Commodore Richard W. Greenwood, CD for the Department of National Defence by LCdr Brent Hobson .................................................................................. 12 Senior Editor Capt(N) Eric Bramwell Is this YOUR ship? DGMEPM Chief of Staff by CPO1 Jeff Morrison ................................................................................ 15 Production Editor / Enquiries Brian McCullough BOOK REVIEWS Tel. (819) 997-9355 / Fax (819) 994-8709 The Japanese Submarine Force and World War II E-mail [email protected] reviewed by LCdr Blaine Duffley ................................................................. 17 Editorial Committee Advisers North Atlantic Run: the Royal Canadian Navy and LCdr Simon Paré (Marine Systems) the Battle for the Convoys LCdr Mike Turpin (Combat Systems) reviewed
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Formidable
    Issue 10 Page 1 Brave Record New Year’s Day 1915 - 547 lost in HMS Formidable The first day of 1915 did not go well for the Royal Navy. Whilst on Channel patrol, in bad weather, the battleship HMS Formidable was torpedoed off Portland Bill at 0220 by U-24. 45 minutes later she was hit by a second torpedo. She remained afloat until 0345 and then sank, her Captain, Noel Loxley, remaining on the bridge accompanied by his Fox terrier ‘Bruce’. She sank quickly with 547 of the 780 crew perishing. Northern Ireland - Service in the Royal Navy - In Remembrance Issue 10 Page 2 Teenage Midshipman of well known local family lost Formidable was the third British battleship to be sunk and the second to be sunk by enemy action, during the First World War. In the ship were five from Northern Ireland who perished. One was the teenage son of a well-known family. John Smiley Coey was a 16 year old Midshipman whose parents Edward and Mary lived in Merville House at Whitehouse. The Coey family were well-known benefactors of local causes. The family endowed Larne Grammar School and Sinclair Seaman’s Mission Church in Belfast. The family were associated with Whiteabbey and Gardenmore, Larne, Presbyterian churches. Merville House was built in 1795 by the Belfast banker and merchant John Brown (c.1740-1808). It was intended as his country retreat. Other fêted people would come to reside at the sprawling 24-acre shoreline manor. Between 1849-1887 it was the home of Sir Edward Coey (1805–87), noted as the first and only Liberal Party Mayor of Belfast (1861) and prominent wealthy businessman, who helped make the city one of the most prosperous manufacturing centres in the world during the 19th century.
    [Show full text]