DOCSLIB.ORG

North Atlantic Run: the Royal Canadian Navy and the Battle for the Convoys Reviewed by Lcdr Patrick Smithers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Atlantic Run: the Royal Canadian Navy and the Battle for the Convoys Reviewed by Lcdr Patrick Smithers Maritime Engineering Journal SPRING 2007 (Established 1982) DEPARTMENTS Commodore’s Corner Sustainable solutions are the key to effective operational support by Commodore Richard Greenwood .............................................................. 2 Forum: A Canadian Common Surface Warship Concept by LCdr Bruce Grychowski ............................................................................ 3 FEATURES Machinery Repair: Step-by-step Repair of a Main Gearbox Lube Oil Supply Line in HMCS Ville de Québec by Bob Steeb ................................................................................................... 7 Director General Maritime Equipment Program Management TML — A Technology Maturity Level Measurement System Commodore Richard W. Greenwood, CD for the Department of National Defence by LCdr Brent Hobson .................................................................................. 12 Senior Editor Capt(N) Eric Bramwell Is this YOUR ship? DGMEPM Chief of Staff by CPO1 Jeff Morrison ................................................................................ 15 Production Editor / Enquiries Brian McCullough BOOK REVIEWS Tel. (819) 997-9355 / Fax (819) 994-8709 The Japanese Submarine Force and World War II E-mail [email protected] reviewed by LCdr Blaine Duffley ................................................................. 17 Editorial Committee Advisers North Atlantic Run: the Royal Canadian Navy and LCdr Simon Paré (Marine Systems) the Battle for the Convoys LCdr Mike Turpin (Combat Systems) reviewed by LCdr Patrick Smithers ............................................................. 18 LCdr Chris Cole (Naval Architecture) CPO1 Jean-Marc Turcot (NCM Member) NEWS BRIEFS .................................................................................................. 19 Jean-François Gagné (Civilian Member) NAVAL TECHNICAL OFFICER AWARDS ....................................................... 23 Production Editing Services by Brightstar Communications, CNTHA NEWS Kanata, Ontario Newsletter of the Canadian Naval Technical Associate Production Editor History Association ................................................................................. Insert Bridget Madill Print Management Services by Director General Public Affairs – Creative Cover Photo: Staff with Fleet Maintenance Facility Cape Scott in Services Halifax created this challenging, custom repair of a cracked main Translation Services by gearbox lube oil supply line in HMCS Ville de Québec without having Public Works and Government Services to weld onto the gearcase. The step-by-step story of the repair begins Translation Bureau on page 7. (Photo courtesy FMF Cape Scott) Mme. Josette Pelletier, Director ADM(Mat) Translation Co-ordinator M. Clément Lachance The Maritime Engineering Journal (ISSN 0713-0058) is an unofficial publication of the Mari- time Engineers of the Canadian Forces, produced three times a year by the Director General Mari- time Equipment Program Management. Views expressed are those of the writers and do not nec- The Journal is available on the DGMEPM essarily reflect official opinion or policy. Mail can be sent to: The Editor, Maritime Engin- website located on the DND DIN intranet eering Journal, DMSS (6 LSTL), NDHQ, 101 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario at http://admmat.dwan.dnd.ca/dgmepm/ Canada K1A 0K2. The editor reserves the right to reject or edit any editorial material. While dgmepm/publications every effort is made to return artwork and photos in good condition, the Journal assumes no re- sponsibility for this. Unless otherwise stated, Journal articles may be reprinted with proper credit. A courtesy copy of the reprinted article would be appreciated. MARITIME ENGINEERING JOURNAL SPRING 2007 1 Commodore’s Corner Sustainable solutions are the key to effective operational support By Commodore Richard W. Greenwood, CD Director General Maritime Equipment Program Management he scope of articles in this what we create. In other words, our ability itself appropriately within the edition of the Maritime En- larger objective is the reliable hierarchy of requirements. gineering Journal has sustainment of effective operational T It falls to the naval technical sup- prompted me to reflect on the vari- capability. This is a key distinction. port community to remain flexible ety of issues, employment and points with respect to future operational of focus we deal with in our collec- One of the great challenges we developments, both in the near and tive endeavour of naval technical face in fulfilling our technical support far terms. Our responsibility is to support. Whether it’s the nitty-gritty role lies simply in maintaining the big consider always how we may best of resolving a recurring in-service picture on our objective and not al- apply the intellectual discipline of failure, graphically demonstrating lowing ourselves to become dis- our training and experience in pro- the need for more careful adherence tracted by sub-optimal solutions. viding sustainable solutions to op- to the principles of shipboard con- Nowhere are the dangers of this type erational requirements, whether or figuration management, examining of distraction more glaring, at least in not those solutions are necessarily in the issues of technological maturity our sphere of effort, than where they the technical domain of our initial and rapid delivery of capability, or de- relate to naval ship procurement training, or in the broader domain of bating the large-scale capability de- projects. Permitting an environment wider CF taskings. sign issues relating to fleet renewal, in which “creeping requirements” it merely reflects the diversity of ac- become the order of the day, or let- tivity that the naval technical branch ting ourselves become unduly and supporting public service and in- swayed by expedient opportunities dustry teams experience on a daily during a project’s definition phase can basis. result in potentially serious, long- lasting “solutions” that are either Looking at all this leads me to unaffordable or unduly limited. Dis- comment on several interrelated ciplined engineering systems analy- points, the most obvious of which is sis is no less essential at the require- the common thread these activities ments definition phase than it is dur- share in their importance to the pri- ing the in-service support phase of macy of operations. Notwithstanding the life-cycle process. that our wide-ranging activities have their effect across very different Developing new capability, timeframes and areas of operation, whether we are talking at the equip- the clear overall objective of our ment level or the ship system level, technical support effort is (as it must is not a simple case of finding the be) to facilitate the achievement of right balance between “technology- maximum effectiveness in opera- push” and “requirements-pull.” It in- tions within the constraints of re- volves careful analysis of the maturity sources. It is also clear that expedi- of given technologies so that we can ency in fielding some new capability walk that fine line between evolution or achieving a given level of systems and revolution as we provide respon- effectiveness is not enough. It is sible and proactive technical leader- equally important to ensure that any ship to the navy. To accomplish this new capability we do introduce “has we must, above all, accept the inevi- legs.” We need to be able to sustain tability of change and establish adapt- 2 MARITIME ENGINEERING JOURNAL SPRING 2007 Forum A Canadian Common Surface Warship Concept Article by LCdr Bruce Grychowski ne of the exciting things mixed classes is not unprecedented (IRE-257) class, the three-ship un- about being involved with in Canadian naval experience. While modified Restigouche class (HMC Oa new ship program is the the 20 steam-driven DDE-205 ships Chaudiere, Columbia and St. opportunity to examine what we are St. Laurent-class anti-submarine Croix), the four-ship Mackenzie hoping to achieve in light of what has (ASW) destroyer escorts built in the (DDE-261) class, and the two-ship gone before. Over the next 10 to 20 1950s and 1960s were never in- Annapolis (DDH-265) class. While years Canada will replace its current tended to be the sole destroyer-type the original St. Laurent design was fleet of three Iroquois-class destroy- warships in the Canadian fleet inven- for a 2,800-ton ASW destroyer es- ers, 12 Halifax-class frigates and 12 tory, circumstances dictated other- cort, the final two ships of the design, Kingston-class maritime coastal de- wise. In fact, the 205-class and its HMCS Annapolis and HMCS fence vessels. The burning question variants comprised the bulk of Cana- Nipigon, were 3,000-ton vessels in most people’s mind, of course, is da’s naval surface combatants for built specifically as DDH anti-sub- replace them with what? The navy nearly 30 years — a remarkable marine escorts. That the variant is setting out on the most difficult achievement. classes differed in their combat sys- process of identifying the require- tems and air capability was a testa- ments for a new class of ship that During their three decades of ser- ment to the excellence of the original could potentially be the only class of vice the St. Laurents, or “cadillacs” design in facilitating the addition of surface combatant in the navy. Un- as they were known, evolved into new weapons and sensors, including like the present fleet mix, the new several variants — the seven-ship most significantly a flight-deck
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Royal Family and the War
    CHAPTER CCLXV. THE ROYAL FAMILY AND THE WAR. THE SOVEREIGN AND "THE FORCES OF THE CROWN "-QUEEN VICTORIA-KING EDWARD AND FOREJGN AFFAIRS-KING GEORGE IN 1914-THE KING'S DAy-VISITS TO THE FRONT-A MEMORY OF CRECy-THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR-ROYAL VISITS TO MUNITION WORKS AND INDUSTRIAL CENTRES-THE KING AND THE NAVy-THE PRINCE OF -VVALES AS A SOLDIER-THE QUEEN'S UNTIRING WORK-THE THRONE IN 1918. HAT were the King and the Royal our old antagonist, was never broken, though Family doing during the Great War? it was often strained, and we had no share W What were the relations between His either in the American Civil War or in the Majesty and his people, his Army, three wars by which Bismarck made the and his Navy? How did he regard his duty, German Empire. Still less broken on the how did he perform it, and how were his surface was the reign of King Edward, whom efforts regarded at the front and in the country? the popular voice named "Peacemaker." How far did the young Princes do their share Soon after his accession the Boer War came to and the Queen and Princesses take a lead in an end; and from the date of the Peace of that multifarious war-work which, in the Vereeniging (May 31, 1902) to that of the hands of women, wa~ one of the wonders of King's lamented death in 1910, England was the country and th~ world? free from war altogether. Before speaking of King George in his What was the c,onstitutional position of relation to the Army, it will be well to look the Sovereign with regard to the Army and back upon some of the military and naval fea­ Navy during these reigns, and did it continue tures of the two preceding reigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Bruce Gear Born: 23 Aug 1883 Brough, Nesting, Died: 1 Jan 1915 at Sea Seaman in the Royal Navy, Royal Naval Reserve, H.M.S
    Charles Bruce Gear Born: 23 Aug 1883 Brough, Nesting, Died: 1 Jan 1915 At sea Seaman in the Royal Navy, Royal Naval Reserve, H.M.S. "Formidable." Service no: B 4626. Awarded 1915 Star, British War Medal and Victory Medal. Father: Magnus GEAR, b. 1844, Brough, Nesting, d. 1938, Aberdeen, (Age 94 years) Mother: Charlotte WILLIAMSON, b. 1848, Catfirth, Nesting, d. 19 Feb 1926, Brough, Nesting, SHI, SCT (Age 78 years) Married: 10 Jan 1871 Nesting. HMS Formidable, the third of four ships of that name to serve in the Royal Navy, was the lead ship of her class of predreadnought battleships. Commissioned in 1904, she served initially with the Mediterranean Fleet, transferring to the Channel Fleet in 1908. In 1912, she was assigned to the 5th Battle Squadron, which was stationed at Nore. Following the outbreak of World War I, the squadron conducted operations in the English Channel, and was based at Sheerness to guard against a possible German invasion. Despite reports of submarine activity, early in the morning of 1 January 1915, whilst on exercise in the English Channel, Formidable sank after being hit by two torpedoes. She was the second British battleship to be sunk by enemy action during the First World War. Technical characteristics: HMS Formidable was laid down at Portsmouth Dockyard on 21 March 1898 and launched on 17 November 1898. She was completed in September 1901, but due to difficulties with machinery contractors her readiness for service was delayed, and she was not commissioned for another three years. Formidable had the same-calibre armament and was similar in appearance to the Majestic and Canopus classes that preceded her.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 1
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. A debate exists whether a ‘Second Cold War’ did in fact break out or whether this merely a changing phase of the ongoing Cold War. This changing situation in East-West relations from the late 1970s onwards will henceforth, be referred to as the Second Cold War. See, for example, Fred Halliday, The Making of the Second Cold War (London: Verso Editions and NLB, second edition, 1986). 2. Private discussions. In 1979 only 2 per cent of the electorate thought defence was a major issue in the election. By 1983 this had risen to 38 per cent. Michael Heseltine, ‘The United Kingdom’s Strategic Interests and Priorities’, RUSI Journal, vol. 128, no. 4, December 1983, pp. 3–5, p. 3. The 1983 election campaign was noteworthy for the action of the previous Labour Prime Minister, James Callaghan, who took the unprecedented step of repudiating his own party’s defence policy; Ian Aitken, ‘Callaghan Wrecks Polaris Repairs’, Guardian, 26 May 1983; Peter M. Jones, ‘British Defence Policy: the Breakdown of the Inter-party Consensus’, Review of International Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, April 1987, pp. 111–31; Bruce George and Curt Pawlisch, ‘Defence and 1983 Election’, ADIU Report, vol. 5, no. 4, July/August 1983, p. 2; Michael Heseltine, Life in the Jungle: My Autobiography (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2000), p. 250. 3. Peter Calvocoressi, ‘Deterrence, the Costs, the Issues, the Choices’, Sunday Times, 6 April 1980. 4. Nicholas J. Wheeler, ‘Perceptions of the Soviet Threat’, in British Security Policy: the Thatcher Years and the End of the Cold War, edited by Stuart Croft (London: HarperCollins Academic, 1991), p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life-Boat
    THE LIFE-BOAT, OB JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL LIFE-BOAT INSTITUTION. [PRICE 2». VOL* . Ill—No. 25.J] JULY IST, 1857. fact, to live; and the tears of weeping THE. RESTORATION OF PERSONS relatives and friends are turned to joy.' APPARENTLY DROWNED. It is, indeed, a privilege to be permitted WHAT member is there of any Christian to take any part in the promotion of so community who has not meditated, with grand a work; proportionally anxious, how- feelings of reverential and grateful emotion, ever, must those feel who are engaged in on the miraculous restoration to life of it to possess themselves with an accurate LAZARUS after he had been dead four days ? knowledge of the most certain means with Who is there that has not pictured to him- which to effect their important under- self the pathetic interview between the two taking. sisters and our SAVIOOE on that memorable The NATIONAL LIFE-BOAT INSTITUTION, occasion ? Who is there whose thoughts although its more immediate function is have not travelled backward through die the provision of means to rescue the ship- long ages that have since passed away, and wrecked mariner and convey him safely tc rejoiced with those favoured women on the the land, is yet frequently, in its pursuit of return of one so dear to them, whom they that function, brought into contact with had mourned over as for ever removed from persons partially drowned. Accordingly, their earthly view ? at its numerous life-boat stations, it has had Such miraculous power is not deputed to posted up in the boat-houses those instruc- mortal man! yet there are cases where the tions for the treatment of seemingly-drowned physician, by the skilful use of the means persons which have been supposed to be which GOD has placed in his hands, pro- the most appropriate, which instructions are duces effects of a strikingly analogous cha- often the only guide of the persons called racter ; where all the functions of life have on' to assist, until medical aid can be ob- ceased; where the heart is still, and the tained.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of the Royal National Life-Boat Institution
    THE LIFE-BOAT. The Journal of the Royal National Life-boat Institution. VOL. XXXI. JUNE, 1939. No. 338. THE LIFE-BOAT FLEET Motor Life-boats, 145 :: Pulling & Sailing Life-boats, 17 LIVES RESCUED from the foundation of the Institution in 1824 to 15th June, 1939 66,237 The Duke of Kent's Presidential Address A Record Year. tragedies it does, and does at once. I AM sorry to say that we meet to-day From the day of the disaster at St. under the shadow of two disasters. Ives it pensioned the widows, children Just three months ago the motor life- and other dependent relatives of the boat at St. Ives went out in the middle seven men, as if those men had been of the night in a gale of exceptional sailors, soldiers or airmen killed in severity. She capsized, and was action. In the case of the men of washed up on the rocks with only one Cullercoats, it will do the same. man of her crew of eight alive. Many of us here to-day must feel that tragedy 3,500 Lives Saved—One Lost. almost as a personal loss, for Coxswain Such disasters remind us of the perils Cocking and four others of those seven which are always present round our men of St., Ives were with us on the coasts. When the St. Ives life-boat platform just a year ago to receive capsized it was just ten years since the medals for gallantry. disaster at Rye Harbour, which was the last major accident involving the A Second Disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine of HMS Fisgard 1982
    H.M.S. INVINCIBLE PORTRAIT OF THE YEAR OFFICERS JOINING OFFICERS LEAVING Father BESTER Lt BRADY Lt Cdr CADD Lt Cdr BROTHERS Lt CHANDLER Father BESTER Lt COVERDALE Lt BENNISON Lt CROWHURST Lt Cdr BAXENDALE Lt EASTAUGH Lt BATES Lt LEA Lt Cdr CHAPMAN Lt MEALOR Lt CHAPPLE Lt NETHERCOTT Lt DOIDGE Lt POWELL Lt Cdr EDMUNDS Lt PANCOTT Lt HAYDEN Lt Cdr PRICE Lt Cdr JONES Lt PETTY Lt Cdr KEENAN Lt ROSE Lt Cdr LEWIS Lt RUEL Lt Cdr LUPTON 1/0 STELLINGWORTH Lt MARSHALL Lt SHIELDS Lt MEEHAN Lt Cdr WALTERS Lt RICHARDSON Lt ROBINSON 2/0 SHEPHERD Lt Cdr SUTTON Lt WARING Lt WILL Lt YOUNG 1/0 YOUNG VIP VISITORS Admiral Sir Desmond CASSIDI (Second Sea Lord) Reverend P PRICE (Principal Church of Scotland and Free Church Chaplain) Commodore ES COUMBE (Director General, Weapons (Naval) ) The Right Reverend Brother MICHAEL (Bishop of St GERMANS) Admiral Sir James EBERLE (Commander-in-Chief, Naval Home Command) Captain JR OSWALD (Captain, BRNC DARTMOUTH) Captain GGW MARSH (Captain, RNEC MANADON) Vice Admiral Sir William PILLAR (Commandant, Royal College of Defence Studies) Rear Admiral TOK SPRAGGS (Chief of Staff to CNH) Rear Admiral RA HARCUS (Retired) Captain J JACOBSEN (Captain, HMS RALEIGH) Captain J BURGESS (Captain, HMS DEFIANCE) Captain BR OUTHWAITE (Captain, HMS RALEIGH) Commodore MF SIMPSON (Commodore, HMS NELSON) The Right Reverend Peter MUMFORD (Bishop of TRURO) The Venerable RH ROBERTS (Chaplain of the Fleet) Captain GAFR HITCHENS (Captain, HMS DEFIANCE) Surgeon Rear Admiral RJW LAMBERT (Surgeon Rear-Admiral, Ships and Establishments) Captain F BOWEN (Captain, HMS COLLINGWOOD) Admiral Sir John FIELDHOUSE (Commander-in-Chief, Fleet) FISGARD The Magazine of H.M.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Defence Under Thatcher
    Defence under Thatcher Andrew M. Dorman Foreword by Michael Clarke Southampton Studies in International Policy Published in association with the Mountbatten Centre for International Studies, University of Southampton General Editor: Dilys M. Hill Other academic members of the editorial board: Ralph Beddard, John Oldfield, Kendrick Oliver, John Simpson This series was established in 1986 to encourage the publication of multi- disciplinary studies of those public policies with significant international com- ponents or implications. Areas of special interest include arms control and defence policies, environmental policies, human rights, maritime and space issues, Third World development questions and the European Union. Selected titles: Lisbeth Aggestam and Arian Hyde-Price (editors) SECURITY AND IDENTITY IN EUROPE Exploring the New Agenda Wyn Q. Bowen THE POLITICS OF BALLISTIC MISSILE NONPROLIFERATION Andrew Dorman DEFENCE UNDER THATCHER David H. Dunn THE POLITICS OF THREAT Minutemen Vulnerability in American National Security Policy Tony Evans US HEGEMONY AND THE PROJECT OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS Paul S. Herrnson and Dilys M. Hill (editors) THE CLINTON PRESIDENCY The First Term, 1992–96 Dilys M. Hill, Raymond A. Moore and Phil Williams (editors) THE REAGAN PRESIDENCY An Incomplete Revolution? Dilys M. Hill and Phil Williams (editors) THE BUSH PRESIDENCY Triumphs and Adversities Mark F. Imber THE USA, ILO, UNESCO AND IAEA Politicization and Withdrawal in the Specialized Agencies John Simpson and Darryl Howlett (editors) THE FUTURE OF THE NON-PROLIFERATION TREATY Joanna Spear CARTER AND ARMS SALES Antonio Varsori (editor) EUROPE, 1945–1990s The End of an Era? Southampton Studies in International Policy Series Standing Order ISBN 0–333–71493–8 (outside North America only) You can receive future titles in this series as they are published by placing a standing order.
    [Show full text]
  • New Tax Package Shapes up in State
    DIAL SH I-OOIO " 1 .n«ut* 'VOL. 85, NO. 222 »T omen. RED BANK, N. J., tfRIDAY, MAY 3, 1963 7c PER COPY PAGE ONE Name Red Bank Zip-Code Center RED BANK - TWi borough )• among «j(l p postal employees will be able to immediately determine that ties detigntted u "sectional centers" - foal Mitt tt (h* mill la destined for Red Bank sectional center. When it ar- New Tax Package 'Pott Office Department's revolutionary JHp-C«fe mill '•ys- rives here, by glancing at the last two digits, our sectional tem tobe unveiled July l, Postmaster Fred A. CfMt fab baa center people will know exactly what town, and what neigh- advised I^Po*tniaster General J.EdwardDay. " barhood the letter goes to.v "Red Bank wai chosen u a •ecUonal center to the Na- The five dl£KJZip-Code (Zoning Improvement Plan) num- ttooal Zip-Code program because it serves a* * main focal bers *» being assigned throughout the country, and will be point of air, highway and rill-transportation in tfris immedi- Available July 1. \ ate vicinity," Postmaster Crlne said. , Applied during Addressing and presorting of large vol- Shapes Up in State ume mail by electronic data processing equipment, used by Hi* SM sectional center* designated nttlonally will play mailers, the Zip-Code numbers will- speed mail service a toy role In the National Zip-Code scheme — ft plan by throughout the country by bypassing several manual sorta- TRENTON (AP)-A new $34.7 which fivtwUgit codes will speed mail deliveries. In some tions. million tax package that features cases by as much as 24 hours.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social Composition of the Territorial Air Force 1930
    The Territorial Air Force 1925-1957 – Officer Recruitment and Class Appendix 2 FRANCES LOUISE WILKINSON A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Wolverhampton for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2017 This work or any part thereof has not previously been presented in any form to the University or to any other body whether for the purposes of assessment, publication or for any other purpose (unless otherwise indicated). Save for any express acknowledgments, references and/or bibliographies cited in the work, I confirm that the intellectual content of the work is the result of my own efforts and of no other person. The right of Frances Louise Wilkinson to be identified as author of this work is asserted in accordance with ss.77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. At this date copyright is owned by the author. Signature……………………………………….. Date…………………………………………….. Appendix Contents Pages Appendix 1 Officers of the reformed RAuxAF 4-54 Appendix 2 Officers commissioned into the RAuxAF With no squadron number given 55-61 Appendix 3 United Kingdom Officers of the Royal Air Force Volunteer Reserve 62-179 3 Officers of the Re-formed Royal Auxiliary Air Force 1946-1957 The following appendix lists the officers of the Royal Auxiliary Air Force by squadron. The date of commission has been obtained by using www.gazette-online.co.uk and searching the archive for each squadron. Date of commission data is found in the Supplements to the London Gazette for the date given. Where material has been found from other press records, interviews, books or the internet, this has been indicated in entries with a larger typeface.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of Monday, Ist February 1982 Lip Gutyoritp
    No. 48879 1401 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette of Monday, ist February 1982 lip gutyoritp Registered as a Newspaper TUESDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY 1982 MINISTRY OF DEFENCE NAVY DEPARTMENT SPECIAL DUTIES LIST Lt. Cdr. J. J. RIGGS, reverts to Retired List 13th Feb. 2nd February 1982. 1982 on ceasing to be re-employed. ROYAL NAVY Lt. (Actg. Lt Cdr.) D. E. HANCOCK, to Retired List 4th Feb. 1982 (granted rank of Lt Cdr. (Hon.)). Surgeon Captain J. Cox, O.B.E., has been appointed Lts. transferred to General List 1st Jan. 1982 with Honorary Surgeon to The QUEEN from 12th February seny. 1st Jan. 1977: 1982 in succession to Surgeon Captain P. W. MEAD, C. J. HOLGATE. O.B.E., Q.H.S. C. W. FlANDER. Actg. Sub Lts. to be Sub Lt. 22nd Sep. 1981 with GENERAL LIST seny. 22nd Sep. 1980: G. L. HAMPSTEAD. Vice-Admiral Sir William PILLAR, K.C.B., to be Admiral with seny. 5th Jan. 1982. R. S. SMITH. Cdr. P. E. THREADINGHAM, to Retired List (own request), 13th Feb. 1982. SUPPLEMENTARY LIST Lt Cdr. P. B. MILES, to Retired List 6th Feb. 1982 (granted rank of Cdr. (Hon.)). Lt. A. D. CROSSLEY, transferred to Medium Career Com- mission 1st Nov. 1981 with seny. 1st May 1975. Lt Cdr. W. D. GLADSTONE, to Retired List, 7th Feb. 1982. CAREERS SERVICE (R.N.) MEDICAL BRANCH Lt T. GILCHRIST, to Retired List, llth Feb. 1982. Surgeon Captain (Actg. Surgeon Commodore) E, E. P. BARNARD, Q.H.P., to be Surgeon Rear Admiral with seny. 3rd Feb. 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • HMS Formidable
    Issue 10 Page 1 Brave Record New Year’s Day 1915 - 547 lost in HMS Formidable The first day of 1915 did not go well for the Royal Navy. Whilst on Channel patrol, in bad weather, the battleship HMS Formidable was torpedoed off Portland Bill at 0220 by U-24. 45 minutes later she was hit by a second torpedo. She remained afloat until 0345 and then sank, her Captain, Noel Loxley, remaining on the bridge accompanied by his Fox terrier ‘Bruce’. She sank quickly with 547 of the 780 crew perishing. Northern Ireland - Service in the Royal Navy - In Remembrance Issue 10 Page 2 Teenage Midshipman of well known local family lost Formidable was the third British battleship to be sunk and the second to be sunk by enemy action, during the First World War. In the ship were five from Northern Ireland who perished. One was the teenage son of a well-known family. John Smiley Coey was a 16 year old Midshipman whose parents Edward and Mary lived in Merville House at Whitehouse. The Coey family were well-known benefactors of local causes. The family endowed Larne Grammar School and Sinclair Seaman’s Mission Church in Belfast. The family were associated with Whiteabbey and Gardenmore, Larne, Presbyterian churches. Merville House was built in 1795 by the Belfast banker and merchant John Brown (c.1740-1808). It was intended as his country retreat. Other fêted people would come to reside at the sprawling 24-acre shoreline manor. Between 1849-1887 it was the home of Sir Edward Coey (1805–87), noted as the first and only Liberal Party Mayor of Belfast (1861) and prominent wealthy businessman, who helped make the city one of the most prosperous manufacturing centres in the world during the 19th century.
    [Show full text]