DOCSLIB.ORG

Transcript for December 3, 2012 Public Hearing for Darlington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transcript for December 3, 2012 Public Hearing for Darlington Canadian Nuclear Commission canadienne de Safety Commission sûreté nucléaire Public hearing Audience publique December 3rd, 2012 Le 3 décembre 2012 Hope Fellowship Church Église Hope Fellowship 1685 Bloor Street 1685, rue Bloor Courtice, Ontario Courtice (Ontario) Commission Members present Commissaires présents Dr. Michael Binder M. Michael Binder Dr. Moyra McDill Mme Moyra McDill Mr. Dan Tolgyesi M. Dan Tolgyesi Ms. Rumina Velshi Mme Rumina Velshi Dr. Ronald Barriault M. Ronald Barriault Mr. André Harvey M. André Harvey Secretary: Secrétaire: Mr. Marc Leblanc M. Marc Leblanc Senior General Counsel : Avocat général principal: Mr. Jacques Lavoie M. Jacques Lavoie (ii) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Opening remarks 1 12-H16.A 6 Adoption of Agenda Ontario Power Generation Inc.: 9 - Environmental Assessment of OPG’s proposed Refurbishment and Continued Operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station (DNGS); - Application by OPG to renew the Darlington Waste Management Facility licence; and, - Application by OPG to renew the Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licence for the DNGS until December 31, 2014 12-H13.1 / 12-H14.1 / 12-H15.1 / 12-H13.1A 10 Oral presentation by Ontario Power Generation Inc. 12-H13 / 12-H13.A / 12-H14 / 12-H15 / 12-H15.A 37 Oral presentation by CNSC staff 12-H13.2 96 Oral presentation by the Sierra Club Canada and The Sierra Club Canada Ontario Chapter 12-H13.3 154 Oral presentation by Tim Seitz 12-H13.190 172 Oral presentation by Williams treaties First Nations (iii) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 12-H13.30 / 12-H13.30A 190 Oral presentation by the Municipality of Clarington 12-H13.67 217 Oral presentation by Lake Ontario Waterkeeper 12-H13.4 263 Oral presentation by the Canadian Environmental Law Association 12-H13.5 296 Oral presentation by the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities 12-H13.6 / 12-H13.6A 303 Oral presentation by Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment 12-H13.200 / 12-H13.200A 335 Oral presentation by Durham Nuclear Awareness 12-H13.24 / 12-H13.24A 358 Oral presentation by the Municipality of Kincardine 12-H13.20 371 Oral presentation by Darlene Buckingham 12-H13.7 / 12-H13.7A 388 Oral presentation by Laura Moynihan 1 Courtice, Ontario --- Upon commencing at 9:05 a.m. Opening Remarks MR. LEBLANC: Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Bonjour à tous. Welcome to the public hearing of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. My name is Marc Leblanc. Je suis le secrétaire la commission et j’aimerais aborder certains aspects touchant le déroulement des audiences. The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is about to start a public hearing on the Darlington Nuclear site regarding the environmental assessment of OPG’s proposed refurbishment and continued operation of the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station. The application by OPG to renew the Darlington Waste Management Facility licence and the application by OPG to renew the nuclear power reactor operating licence for the Darlington Nuclear Generating Station until December 31st, 2014. During today’s business we have simultaneous translation in English and French. Des appareils de traduction sont disponibles à la réception. La version française est au 2 poste 2, and the English version is on channel 1. Please keep the pace of your speech relatively slow so that the translators have a chance to keep up. L'audience est enregistrée et transcrite textuellement. Les transcriptions se font dans l'une ou l'autre des langues officielles. I’d also like you to know that this hearing is being video webcast live and that the hearing is also archived on our website for a three-month period after the closure of the hearing. The transcripts will be available on the website of the Commission in about 10 to 14 days. To make the transcripts as meaningful as possible, we would ask everyone to identify themselves before speaking. As a courtesy to others in the room, please silence your cell phones and other electronic devices. M. Binder, président et premier dirigeant de la CCSN, présidera l'audience publique d'aujourd'hui. Mister President. THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you, Marc, and good morning to everybody. And first of all, let me share with you on behalf of the Commission how delighted we are here to be today in your community. It’s a great pleasure for us first to get out of Ottawa, trust me on that one, and to be in a community and allow for the community members 3 to participate in this hearing. I’d also like to thank the people of the Hope Fellowship Church for helping us set-up in this facility, so thank you for that. My name is Michael Binder. I’m the President of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. And welcome to all of you who are joining us through the webcast and some will be joining us through teleconference. So let me start by introducing Members of the Commission. On my right are Dr. Moyra McDill and Monsieur Dan Tolgyesi. On my left are Ms. Rumina Velshi, Dr. Ronald Barriault and Monsieur André Harvey. We heard from Marc Leblanc, the Secretary of the Commission, and we have Jacques Lavoie, Senior General Counsel of the Commission with us here today. Before we start, I’d like to make some few remarks. We are in Clarington, Courtice the next four days to consider the written submissions and oral presentations for a large number of citizens and organizations who wish to express their opinion on the three matters that are our focus -- that are the focus of the hearing this week. I’d like to clarify a few things before we getting this hearing underway. First of all, I wish to 4 emphasize that the Commission is a quasi-judicial administrative tribunal and that consequently, it is independent; any political, government or private-sector influence. In fact, each Commission Member is independent of one another and also independent of the CNSC staff. Interventions for this hearing include recommendations to the Commission. CNSC staff also make recommendations to the Commission and it is the Commission Members who will render a decision based on all the evidence presented in the context of the hearing process. The Commission Members are appointed by the gouvernor-in-council on the basis of their achievement in their respective fields of endeavour as well as their excellent reputation among their peers. The mandate is simple; ensure that the use of nuclear is done in a manner that protects the environment as well as the health, safety and security of the workers and the public. Several intervenors have raised important questions on the future of nuclear energy in the Province of Ontario. Many are making -- many are asking why more consideration is not given to wind and solar and other renewable energy sources instead of nuclear energy. I trust that you will understand that the Commission, as an administrative tribunal, does not have 5 the statutory authority and will not consider questions that are of a political nature and that it is the Ontario Provincial Government that must address these fundamental energy policy questions. I would also like to emphasize that the CNSC has no economic mandate and will not base its decision on the economic impact of the facility. I will repeat it. It is the health, safety and security of the public and the protection of the environment that guides our decision. Finally, as I stated earlier, the Commission is an administrative tribunal. It is willing to conduct its hearing in the affected community and to provide the forum where members of the public can express their views on the matter at hand. As the Commission is a tribunal and wishes to hear the more than 90 oral presentations and ask questions of these -- on these, we ask that everyone respect the decorum and assists with the orderly conduct of these proceedings. Thank you for your attention. So with this information, I would like now to call for the adoption of the agenda of the Commission Members as outlined in Commission Member Document 12- H16.A. Do I have concurrence? For the record, the agenda is adopted. 6 Marc? 12-H16.A Adoption of Agenda MR. LEBLANC: Thank you. So a notice of public hearing was published on September 4th, 2012 to announce the public hearing on OPG’s Darlington Nuclear site. A revised notice was published on October 25th to announce the new dates of hearing in light of the large number of submissions received from the public. The submissions filed by OPG and the recommendations filed by CNSC staff were made available on September 14th. The public was invited to participate either by oral presentation or written submissions. October 15 was the revised deadline set for filing by intervenors. The Commission received 212 requests for intervention, including 90 oral presentations and 478 similar email submissions from a later campaign. CNSC staff filed two supplementary documents on November 15; these documents were sent to all intervenors. November 26 was the deadline for filing of supplementary information and we know that supplementary 7 submissions and presentations had been filed by CNSC staff, OPG, and several intervenors. Participant funding was available to intervenors to prepare for and participate in the hearing. The Commission received six requests for funding. The Funding Review Committee, which is independent of the Commission, reviewed the applications. Funding was provided to the six applicants as per a decision issued on May 17, 2012 by that independent Committee. Further to a request that was received on November 30th pursuant to Section 20 of the CNSC Rules and Procedures, there was a request that Member Rumina Velshi recuse herself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Branch
    CA9600028 Background Paper BP-365E THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY Alan Nixon Science and Technology Division December 1993 Library of Parliament Research Bibliothèque du Parlement Branch The Research Branch of the Library of Parliament works exclusively for Parliament conducting research and providing information for Committees and Members of the Senate and the House of Commons. This service is extended without partisan bias in such forms as Reports, Background Papers and Issue Reviews. Research Officers in the Branch are also available for personal consultation in their respective fields of expertise. ©Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1994 Available in Canada through your local bookseller or by mail from Canada Communication Group -- Publishing Ottawa, Canada K1A 0S9 Catalogue No. YM32-2/365E ISBN 0-660-15639-3 CE DOCUMENT EST AUSSI PUBUÉ EN FRANÇAIS LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT BIBLIOTHÈQUE OU PARLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EARLY CANADIAN NUCLEAR DEVEOPMENT 2 THE CANDU REACTOR 4 NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION IN CANADA 5 A. Background 5 B. Performance 6 C. Pickering Nuclear Generating Station 8 D. Bruce Nuclear Generating Station 9 1. Retubing 9 2. Pressure Tube Frets 10 3. Shut Down System Design Flaw 12 4. Steam Generators 12 E. Darlington 13 1. Start-up Problems 13 2. Costs 14 AECL 15 A. Introduction 15 B. CANDU-Design and Marketing 16 1. Design 16 2. Marketing 17 a. Export Markets 17 b. Domestic Market ! 18 C. AECL Research 19 D. Recent Developments 20 OUTLOOK 21 * CANADA LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT BIBLIOTHÈQUE DU PARLEMENT THE NUCLEAR POWER INDUSTRY IN CANADA Nuclear power, the production of electricity from uranium through nuclear fission, is by far the most prominent segment of the nuclear industry.
    [Show full text]
  • SEA of Revocation of North East Regional Strategy
    Appendix D - SEA of Revocation of North East Regional Strategy Score + + + 0 - - - ? Key: Significant Minor positive effect No overall effect Minor negative Significant Score uncertain Positive effect effect negative effect NB: where more than one symbol is presented in a box it indicates that the SEA has found more than one score for the category. Where the scores are both positive and negative, the boxes are deliberately not coloured. S – short term (less than 0.75 year), M – medium term (between 0.75 and 5 years) and L – long term (>5 years) RS Policy: 1 North East Renaissance Alternative Commentary Air Soil Water and fauna Landscape Population & human Health Material assets Climatic factors Cultural Heritage Biodiversity, flora S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L Retention + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Likely Significant Effects of Retention + + + Policy 1 – Urban Renaissance identifies four key themes which support the central theme through the RSS of achieving and maintaining a high quality of life for all, both now and in the future. It forms one of the key policies which set the overarching framework for the remainder of the plan. The theme of urban renaissance is a core element of the RES, which identifies the need for business to as the key driver for growth, increasing prosperity through supporting enterprise and up-skilling of the workforce and conserving, enhancing and capitalising on the Region’s diverse natural and built environment. This policy, if properly implemented, should have positive impacts across the SEA 1 Appendix D November 2012 Appendix D - SEA of Revocation of North East Regional Strategy Alternative Commentary Air Soil Water and fauna Landscape Population & human Health Material assets Climatic factors Cultural Heritage Biodiversity, flora S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L S M L themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast England – a History of Flash Flooding
    Northeast England – A history of flash flooding Introduction The main outcome of this review is a description of the extent of flooding during the major flash floods that have occurred over the period from the mid seventeenth century mainly from intense rainfall (many major storms with high totals but prolonged rainfall or thaw of melting snow have been omitted). This is presented as a flood chronicle with a summary description of each event. Sources of Information Descriptive information is contained in newspaper reports, diaries and further back in time, from Quarter Sessions bridge accounts and ecclesiastical records. The initial source for this study has been from Land of Singing Waters –Rivers and Great floods of Northumbria by the author of this chronology. This is supplemented by material from a card index set up during the research for Land of Singing Waters but which was not used in the book. The information in this book has in turn been taken from a variety of sources including newspaper accounts. A further search through newspaper records has been carried out using the British Newspaper Archive. This is a searchable archive with respect to key words where all occurrences of these words can be viewed. The search can be restricted by newspaper, by county, by region or for the whole of the UK. The search can also be restricted by decade, year and month. The full newspaper archive for northeast England has been searched year by year for occurrences of the words ‘flood’ and ‘thunder’. It was considered that occurrences of these words would identify any floods which might result from heavy rainfall.
    [Show full text]
  • North & South Tees Industrial Development Framework
    TEES VALLEY JOINT STRATEGY UNIT NORTH & SOUTH TEES INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK November 2009 FSE97402A.2170 Prepared by Prepared for Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd & Genecon Tees Valley Joint Strategy Unit Manchester Technology Centre Melrose House, Melrose Street, Oxford Road Middlesbrough Manchester TS1 2XF M1 7ED Report Title : North & South Tees Industrial Development Framework Report Status : Version 2 Job No : FSE97402A Date : November 2009 Prepared by : Daniel Dufton, Mark Reynolds, Ben Pretty .. Checked by : Sarah Claxton .................................................. Approved by : Paul Noble ........................................................ CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT BRIEFING SECTION 1 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of the Report 1 1.2 Context 1 1.3 Report Structure 2 SECTION 2 3 RATIONALE FOR INTERVENTION 3 2.1 Introduction 4 2.2 The Importance of Manufacturing Industry in North South Tees 4 2.3 Economic Development Policy Rationale 6 2.4 Equity and Competitiveness Rationale 11 2.5 Current Challenges and Constraints 12 2.6 Summary 21 SECTION 3 22 STRATEGIC SECTOR OPPORTUNITIES 22 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 Offshore Wind 23 3.3 Decommissioning / Fabrication Activities in Marine and Oil / Gas Sectors 24 3.4 Port Related Opportunities 24 3.5 Carbon Capture and Storage 25 3.6 Power Generation and Export 25 3.7 Bulk Chemicals 26 3.8 Biotechnology 28 3.9 Biofuels 28 3.10 Waste / Resource Recovery 29 3.11 Steel 29 3.12 Industrial Symbiosis 30 3.13 Summary 32 SECTION 4 33 STRATEGIC ANALYSIS 33 4.1 Constraints Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Section 9: Iter Canada Bid to Host Iter
    Page 10-1 SECTION 10: ITER CANADA PLAN TO HOST ITER COMPLIANCE WITH THE ITER SITE REQUIREMENTS AND SITE DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS 10.1 INTRODUCTION The basis for analyzing the suitability of the Clarington site and the Iter Canada technical Plan, especially compared with other offers or potential offers, is the Iter Council approved document - “ITER FEAT – Site Requirements and Site Design Assumptions”, ITER Meeting, Tokyo, January 2000. These criteria were also published as ITER FEAT ODR I.1.4 and N CL RI 3 99-10-19 W 0.2). These same criteria are also reproduced verbatim in Section 4 of the Plant Design Specification (PDS) of the draft ITER Final Design Report. Iter Canada agrees with these criteria and assumptions as defined and agreed to by the Iter Parties. These criteria formed the basis of Iter Canada’s own site selection process and they proved to be technically, socially and politically sound. We, therefore, believe they can also be a sound basis for conducting a rigorous and fair site selection process between all the offered Iter sites. In nearly all cases, the conditions at the Clarington site are more favourable to construction and operation of Iter, than defined in the Iter site requirements and assumptions. The following is a summary analysis of how the Iter Canada Plan meets or accommodates each of the Site Requirements and how the Iter Canada Plan addresses all of the Site Design Assumptions. For convenience, the Iter Parties’ criteria are shown in Bold Italics, and references are made to other Sections of the Plan, where the specifics of the item are described more fully.
    [Show full text]
  • Tees Cottage; Waterworks and Pumping Station April 2018 AE
    Tees Cottage; Waterworks and Pumping Station April 2018 AE-0181-2018 Archaeo-Environment Ltd is registered in England and Wales Registered number 04727850 Tees Cottage. Cover illustration. The front cover shows and extract from drawings by T & C Hawksley and Co. for the works of 1900-04 and the construction of the great beam engine. Copyright Durham Record Office. Archaeo-Environment for Tees Cottage Preservation Trust. 2018-04-27 Tees Cottage. Version Control. While every care has been made in the researching and writing of this document it is inevitable that new information or insights will come to light regarding the history of Tees Cottage Pumping Station. So that any such ‘new’ information is not lost or held separately, it is recommended that it be integrated into future versions of this report and noted in the references/bibliography sections. This report should therefore be seen as a living document to be enhanced and built upon as the years go by. It is essential that this process is overseen by a single responsible individual and that edits are recorded where possible. This will prevent the unfortunate and confusing circumstance of their being more than one version of the report. Ideally the definitive version of the report should be held digitally on a shared drive accessible on the internet for all to read, but with edit rights restricted to the nominated individual. The table below should be completed when changes are made to the document. Version Date Author Summary of any Changes 1.0 2018-04-27 Niall Hammond Original Document as supplied to the TCPS Copyright Declaration: Archaeo-Environment give permission for the material presented within this report to be used by the Tees Cottage Pumping Station (TCPS) and any public archive/repository with which it is deposited, in perpetuity, although Archaeo-Environment retains the right to be identified as the author as specified in the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (chapter IV, section 79).
    [Show full text]
  • Withdrawn 16 May 2019
    2019 May 16 This is a UK trade and Investment Document Withdrawn UK Power Capabilities for a low carbon future 2019 May 16 Withdrawn With an annual turnover of $50 billion, the UK’s power sector employs 230,000 people and has exports2019 of more than $6 billion per year to over 100 countries. May The UK’s power sector plays a leading role in the global development of generative capacity, and is at the heart of the 16 massive international ‘push for power’. World electricity generation capacity is forecast to reach almost 34,000TWh by 2030, requiring an investment into new generative capacity of around 5,000GW. This will require thousands of new-build renewable, nuclear and thermal installations. Once operational, the new power stations will need ongoing maintenance and repair, asset management and upgrading. Transmission and distributions networks must be constructed to supply the consumers of this new generative capacity. Withdrawn The skills, experience and expertise of the UK-based power sector and its supply chain are geared to meeting this demand. 2019 May 16 Withdrawn Content Introduction 04-05 Renewables 06-09 Nuclear 10-13 Thermal 201914-17 Transmission and distribution 18-21 Asset management 22-25 Advisory services May 26-29 Education, training and research 30-33 UK Trade & Investment 16 34-35 Contacts 36 Withdrawn 04 UK Power | Capabilities for a low carbon future Introduction The UK power sector and its supply chain are perfectly positioned to support global investment in new generative capacity, new sources of energy and2019 the transmission and distribution networks to link these new power sources with consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • High Volts Turbine No.2 (100 Metres to Tip) and Digger
    High Volts Turbine No.2 (100 metres to tip) and digger. - 1 - CONTENTS Section 1 Page 5 Green alert for the PM Reply on behalf of Patricia Hewitt regarding RSS DTI Campaign It’s Only Natural BWEA Campaign –Embrace The Revolution BWEA Workshops DTI funded Regional Targets for Wind Energy (BWEA) The Pot of Gold Prof. Fells Never mind the quality, see the height Section 2 Page 37 PPS22 Companion Guide Case Studies Planner headhunted by Prescott Kielder decision letter from DTI Blast from judge on Ecogen’s High Court Challenge RSS Draft Indicative Diagram PPS22 CG RSS Draft Indicative Diagram NEA Energy Paper 7 Member training PPS22CG Case Study 3E Section 3 Page 52 Walkway Sedgefield. My Case Study A Barrister’s Report on Wind farms and Planning The Scarweather Saga –The Truth The Unelected NEA and the RSS We now have the law (ODPM) Cumulative Effect of Wind Turbines Events from 1998-2005 Section 4 Page 74 NAREC Regional Launch. SERA the Role of Wind Power From Russia without Love NE Regional Renewable Energy Strategy More of that ‘aarful’ story My Challenge to PPS22CG Appendices Page 91 A Letters to the North East Assembly ref. the RSS B DTI Study on Low Frequency Noise C Glasfiber’s Donation to labour funds D EDF: Same developments but different accounts E BWEA 25 Annual Event (Oct 2003) F Christopher Booker’s Notebook/ Prescott’s Plan G How PPS22 CG has evolved H BWEA website: Real power and UKWED I Miscellaneous including Press Releases References Page110 - 2 - FOREWARD An aaful story Whisht! lads, haad yor gobs, An' aa'll tell ye aall an aaful story, Whisht! lads, haad yor gobs, An' Aa'll tel ye 'boot the wyrm.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Nuclear Energy Sector
    CANADA’S NUCLEAR ENERGY SECTOR: WHERE TO FROM HERE? FINAL REPORT JANUARY 2014 The Public Policy Forum is an independent, not-for-profit organization dedicated to improving the quality of government in Canada through enhanced dialogue among the public, private and voluntary sectors. The Forum’s members, drawn from business, federal, provincial and territorial governments, the voluntary sector and organized labour, share a belief that an efficient and effective public service is important in ensuring Canada’s competitiveness abroad and quality of life at home. Established in 1987, the Forum has earned a reputation as a trusted, nonpartisan facilitator, capable of bringing together a wide range of stakeholders in productive dialogue. Its research program provides a neutral base to inform collective decision making. By promoting information sharing and greater links between governments and other sectors, the Forum helps ensure public policy in our country is dynamic, coordinated and responsive to future challenges and opportunities. © 2013, Public Policy Forum 1405-130 Albert St. Ottawa, ON K1P 5G4 Tel: (613) 238-7160 Fax: (613) 238-7990 www.ppforum.ca ISBN: 978-1-927009-50-5 2 | CANADA’S NUCLEAR ENERGY SECTOR: WHERE TO FROM HERE? | 3 WITH THANKS TO OUR PROJECT SPONSORS AND OUR NUCLEAR SUMMIT EVENING RECEPTION SPONSORS 2 | CANADA’S NUCLEAR ENERGY SECTOR: WHERE TO FROM HERE? | 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS On behalf of the Public Policy Forum and our partners, I wish to thank the individuals and organizations across Canada who participated in the dialogue on the future of Canada’s nuclear energy sector. This report synthesizes the results of two workshop discussions (May 14 and 23, 2013) and an executive summit on September 4, 2013, with leaders from the private, public, academic, association, labour and diplomatic communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSULTATION STATEMENT July 20
    Darlington Local Development Framework DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT: CONSULTATION STATEMENT July 2011 DESIGN OF NEW DEVELOPMENT SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT: CONSULTATION STATEMENT ___________________________________________________________________ 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document sets out what consultations were undertaken during the preparation of the Design of New Development Supplementary Planning Document (Design SPD), and outlines the main issues that emerged from those consultations. 1.2 This document has also been prepared to meet the requirements of Regulation 17(b) of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development)(England) Regulations 2004. 2. CONSULTATIONS UNDERTAKEN 2.1 The consultations referred to in this statement are those that were carried out in respect of the Design SPD, adopted in 2009. These remain relevant as the changes to the original SPD that are included in this revised SPD are very limited in their nature, extent and impact, reflecting adoption of the Core Strategy design policy CS2, on which this SPD elaborates. Extensive consultations were carried out on the Core Strategy design policy CS2, but no further consultations were undertaken in preparing the revised draft, because of the limited nature of the changes. 2.2 The Council’s approach to carrying out consultations on the scope, nature and content of the SPD has been through a variety of means, from stakeholder events, to school council meetings, to Ward Councillor Surgeries. A variety of methods enables a wider audience in the community to be reached. 2.3 Consultation responses have been drawn together from the following sources: (i) Comments made in specific relation to the Design SPD Consultation Draft Document; (ii) Feedback from the various meetings, groups and sessions held during the Consultation period; (iii) Discussion and debate at a specially organised Stakeholder Workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • The Industrial Revolution in Europe
    The Industrial Revolution in Europe Origins . Mines and manufactories have for many centuries currency of some cities was the appropriately been a part of European society, as have the means processed agricultural produce of its region, the of trading and transporting their products. From the wines traded at Bordeaux and Oporto, the grain sent mid-18 th century the economies of Great Britain and abroad from the wooden warehouses of Gdansk, the of some other countries became increasingly olive oil handled at Naples, the cheeses exported concerned with ‘industry’, a term that had previously from Amsterdam and Bristol. The products of what indicated a virtue and came to mean the production would now be called industry were also carried to of goods on a large scale. Some cities came to be the great trading cities of 17 th century Europe from dominated by factories, and by the canals and their hinterlands, copper ingots and bars of railways that delivered their raw materials and took wrought-iron from Dalarna to Stockholm, Flemish away their products. An increasing proportion of the linens to Antwerp, textiles of various kinds to people of Europe came to be city-dwellers. This Venice. Evidence of Europe’s flourishing trade before ‘industrial revolution’ was a self-sustaining process. the industrial revolution can be found in many Its consequences have shaped society in every places. When the Norwich haberdasher John Hovell European nation through the 19 th and 20 th centuries, died in 1681, the contents of his shop included and its global implications are determining our wooden rattles, drums and dolls-house furniture and future.
    [Show full text]
  • North East England and the Climate Crisis from Cause to Effect
    North East England and the Climate Crisis From Cause to Effect Peter Stark OBE Interim Project Lead VONNE Climate Project 2019 & 2020 1 North East England and the Climate Crisis. From Cause to Effect. Contents Preface and summary. 1] Climate Change and the future of our world. 2] What part did the North East of England play in the causes of the crisis? 3] The 18th century. From iron works and waggon ways to early steam power. 4] The 19th Century. Deep mining and the railways. 5] The North of England Institute of Mining and Mechanical Engineers. 6] The 20th Century. Peak Coal, steam turbines and the coal fired power station. 7] The wider heavy industrial context and the unique role of the Tees Valley. 8] The effects on NE workers, families, communities and the environment. 9] A response in communitarian values and a radical politics. 10] The turn of the 21st century and an unjust transition. 11] Connecting the North East to the causes and effects of the climate crisis. 12] Finding a framework for an effective regional response. Coda The North East England Climate Coalition 2 Preface and summary In 1984 I returned to the North East as Director of Northern Arts after 20 years learning my trade as a project developer and manager, teacher and policy analyst in the arts and culture around the UK. In the mid-1990s I served as Special Projects Adviser to Gateshead Council on the Baltic Gallery, the Millennium Bridge and what became Sage Gateshead and then moved to Northumbria University as Professor and Director of the Centre for Cultural Policy and Management in 2000.
    [Show full text]