DOCSLIB.ORG

Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors Aspects of Advanced Fuel FRC Fusion Reactors John F Santarius and Gerald L Kulcinski Fusion Technology Institute Engineering Physics Department CT2016 Irvine, California August 22-24, 2016 [email protected]; 608-692-4128 Laundry List of Fusion Reactor Development Issues • Plasma physics of fusion fuel cycles • Engineering issues unique or more ! Cross sections and Maxwellian reactivity important for DT fuel ! Beta and B-field utilization ! Tritium-breeding blanket design ! Plasma fusion power density ! Neutron damage to materials ! Plasma energy and particle confinement ! Radiological hazard (afterheat and waste disposal) ! Neutron production vs Ti for various fuel ion ratios • Safety • Geometry implications for engineering design • Environment ! Power flows • Licensing ! Direct energy conversion ! Magnet configuration • Economics ! Radiation shielding ! Maintenance in a highly radioactive environment • Nuclear non-proliferation ! Coolant piping accessibility • Non‑electric applications • Plasma‑surface interactions • 3He fuel supply JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 2 UW Developed and/or Participated in 40 MFE & 26 IFE Power Plant and Test Facility Studies in Past 46 years MFE-40 IFE-26 JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 3 Total Fusion Reactivities for Key Fusion Fuels Total Energy Production Rate st 1 generation fuels: MaxwellianTotal Reactivities -19 D + T → n (14.07 MeV) + 4He (3.52 MeV) 10 D + D → n (2.45 MeV) + 3He (0.82 MeV) → p (3.02 MeV) + T (1.01 MeV) -20 {50% each channel} 10 D-T D-3He -21 2nd generation fuel: 10 D + 3He → p (14.68 MeV) + 4He (3.67 MeV) 10-22 rd 3 generation fuels: p-11B 3He + 3He 2 p + 4He (12.86 MeV) → 10-23 3He- 11 4 - 3 p + B → 3 He (8.68 MeV) D D He 10-24 100 101 102 Ion temperature keV JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 4 H L What Are the Solar System 3He Resources? • ~100 kg 3He accessible on Earth ! ~2 GW-y fusion energy for R&D • ~109 kg 3He on lunar surface for the 21st & 22nd centuries ! ~1000 y world energy supply • ~1023 kg 3He in gas-giant planets for the indefinite future ! ~1017 y of world energy supply L.J. Wittenberg, J.F. Santarius, and G.L. Kulcinski, “Lunar Source of 3He for Commercial Fusion Power,” FusionEscher, Technology Other 10, 167 (1986).World, 1947 JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 5 Private Enterprise Has Discovered the Moon Lunar Missions 2003-2021 JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 6 At a Minimum, the Fusion Power Must Sustain the Plasma against Charged-Particle and Bremsstrahlung Losses • Ignition against bremsstrahlung (only) is For Te = Ti calculated using 1024 ! Bremsstrahlung formulas " Nonrelativisticq ne 3 ni nk 3 P = Pbrem#43! eff 2 T0.5e + Ti fus! " ΤeE 2 k nΤ 2 Pbrem 5.36 10 Z ne Te kE 1023 D!D " Relativistic P ! 5.36 " 10#43 n2 T0.5 0.00414 T $ 0.071 Zeff T#0.5 3 brem e e e 3 e " 22 He:D " # s $ eff $ $ " #6 2 3 10 Z 1 0.00155 Te 7.15!10 Te ! "1:1 m ! " Definitions ! E Τ 21 z2 n z3 n e 10 eff i" i eff i i #$ n Z % and Z3 % ne ne i i D!T 1020 % % • Note: fusion ash accumulation, an issue for all reactor plasmas, possibly will be 1019 1 5 10 50 100 mitigated in FRCs due to nonadiabicity of Ti keV the several MeV energy of the fusion- 3 product alphas (and protons for D He). ! " JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 7 Neutron Production & Plasma Fusion Power Density Neutron Production Relative Power Density at Constant B & β Maxwellian Plasma 1. 0.5 D!T 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.02 3He:D"1:1 Watershed level for no 0.01 blanket/shield changeout 0.005 D!D Relative fusion power density T burn fraction = 0.5 0.002 for D-D & D-3He 0.001 1. 2. 3. 5. 7. 10. 20. 30. 50. 70.100. Ion temperature keV Pplasma 2nkBT ! " 2 β ≡ ≈ 2 ⇒ n ∝ βB PBfield B /2µ0 P fus = n n E < σ v > ∝ β2 B4 V 1 2 fus € JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 8 € 3He-3He Reactions Will Produce Less Radioactivity than p-11B Reactions in Maxwellian Plasmas JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 9 Advanced Fuel Fusion Power Density Can Improve Greatly through Increasing β and B-Field • Low tokamak and stellarator β limits cause optimized reactor design B-fields to approach the technological limits (~20 T) on magnet coils, leaving little room to gain power density by increasing B. • High-β concepts optimize at low B, because neutron damage requires frequent blanket and shield changeout, leaving a large technical margin for increasing B. JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 10 Advancd-Fuel Full-Lifetime Structure Gives a More Robust System and Reduces Maintenance Frequency JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 11 Linear Geometry Allows Much Easier Maintenance and Plumbing • Some advantages of linear ITER Fusion Core geometry: ! Few interlocking systems ! Modularity ! Easier routing of plumbing Tri Alpha Energy C-2 Experiment JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 12 Power Flows Can Be Handled Much More Easily in Linear Geometry • Charged-particle power transports from internal plasmoid (in an FRC or spheromak) to edge region and then out ends of fusion core. • Expanded flux tube in end chamber reduces heat and particle fluxes. • Mainly bremsstrahlung power contributes to first-wall surface heat. • Relatively small peaking factor along axis for bremsstrahlung and neutrons. JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 13 Direct Energy Conversion Can Be Applied to End-Loss Plasma Barr-Moir experiment, LLNL • Experiment and theory agreed (Fusion Technology, 1973) within 2%. • Direct conversion would provide 60-80% efficiency for escaping fusion products. Ion beam • Bremsstrahlung (x-rays) require thermal energy conversion. JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 14 Plasma Surface Interactions Can Create Damage + • Linear geometry devices can 30 keV He Irradiation of Polycrystalline Tungsten handle high heat fluxes, caused 17 + by charged particles escaping φL - 6x10 He / cm2 at 900 oC. the core, by expanding the flux tube in the end tank. • Tokamaks take that heat and those particles mainly in a thin strip along the divertor, leading to surface heat fluxes of 10-20 MW m-2. 3 µm 200 nm From S. J. Zenobia, L. M. Garrison, G. L. Kulcinski. "The response of polycrystalline tungsten to 30 keV helium ion implantation at normal incidence and high temperatures." Journal of Nuclear Materials 425, 83 (2012). JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 15 Can We Design Proliferation-Proof Advanced Fuel FRCs? Large α particle & D3He Direct converter for Advanced fuel for proton gyroradii contribute increased electric low neutron wall loading to macroscopic stability power per unit High β for high fusion fusion power power density Minimal Superconducting, radiation shield high-field magnet Organic coolant to to reduce for high fusion make high-flux DT space for DT power density operation difficult shielding JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 16 Summary • DT fuel is the easiest to burn, whereas burning advanced fuels requires continued, modest plasma physics progress, especially in energy confinement. • Physics development path typically costs less than engineering development path => advanced fuels. • Considerations of engineering, safety, environment, and licensing favor advanced fuels, while cost remains to be determined. • Advanced fuels require the development of the FRC or another suitable high‑β, innovative concept. JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 17 Back Pocket Slides 3He Plays a Key Role in the Advanced Fusion Fuels -27 Key Fusion Fuels 10 1st Generation D-T 10-28 D + T → n (14.07 MeV) + 4He (3.52 MeV) 3 D + D → n (2.45 MeV) + 3He (0.82 MeV) D- He 10-29 → p (3.02 MeV) + T (1.01 MeV) Total {50% each channel} D-D p-11B 10-30 2nd Generation D + 3He p (14.68 MeV) + 4He (3.67 MeV) → 10-31 3He-3He 3rd Generation 10-32 p + 11B → 3 4He (8.68 MeV) 1. 2. 5. 10. 20. 50. 100. 200. 500.1000. Center-of-Mass Energy keV 3He + 3He → 2 p + 4He (12.86 MeV) H L JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 19 Advanced Fuels Could Lower R&D Costs Engineering R&D costs typically dominate physics R&D costs. JFS 2016 Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin 20 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Formation of Hot, Stable, Long-Lived Field-Reversed Configuration Plasmas on the C-2W Device
    IOP Nuclear Fusion International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Fusion Nucl. Fusion Nucl. Fusion 59 (2019) 112009 (16pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ab0be9 59 Formation of hot, stable, long-lived 2019 field-reversed configuration plasmas © 2019 IAEA, Vienna on the C-2W device NUFUAU H. Gota1 , M.W. Binderbauer1 , T. Tajima1, S. Putvinski1, M. Tuszewski1, 1 1 1 1 112009 B.H. Deng , S.A. Dettrick , D.K. Gupta , S. Korepanov , R.M. Magee1 , T. Roche1 , J.A. Romero1 , A. Smirnov1, V. Sokolov1, Y. Song1, L.C. Steinhauer1 , M.C. Thompson1 , E. Trask1 , A.D. Van H. Gota et al Drie1, X. Yang1, P. Yushmanov1, K. Zhai1 , I. Allfrey1, R. Andow1, E. Barraza1, M. Beall1 , N.G. Bolte1 , E. Bomgardner1, F. Ceccherini1, A. Chirumamilla1, R. Clary1, T. DeHaas1, J.D. Douglass1, A.M. DuBois1 , A. Dunaevsky1, D. Fallah1, P. Feng1, C. Finucane1, D.P. Fulton1, L. Galeotti1, K. Galvin1, E.M. Granstedt1 , M.E. Griswold1, U. Guerrero1, S. Gupta1, Printed in the UK K. Hubbard1, I. Isakov1, J.S. Kinley1, A. Korepanov1, S. Krause1, C.K. Lau1 , H. Leinweber1, J. Leuenberger1, D. Lieurance1, M. Madrid1, NF D. Madura1, T. Matsumoto1, V. Matvienko1, M. Meekins1, R. Mendoza1, R. Michel1, Y. Mok1, M. Morehouse1, M. Nations1 , A. Necas1, 1 1 1 1 1 10.1088/1741-4326/ab0be9 M. Onofri , D. Osin , A. Ottaviano , E. Parke , T.M. Schindler , J.H. Schroeder1, L. Sevier1, D. Sheftman1 , A. Sibley1, M. Signorelli1, R.J. Smith1 , M. Slepchenkov1, G. Snitchler1, J.B. Titus1, J. Ufnal1, Paper T. Valentine1, W. Waggoner1, J.K. Walters1, C.
    [Show full text]
  • NIAC 2011 Phase I Tarditti Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture Final Report
    NASA-NIAC 2001 PHASE I RESEARCH GRANT on “Aneutronic Fusion Spacecraft Architecture” Final Research Activity Report (SEPTEMBER 2012) P.I.: Alfonso G. Tarditi1 Collaborators: John H. Scott2, George H. Miley3 1Dept. of Physics, University of Houston – Clear Lake, Houston, TX 2NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 3University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL Executive Summary - Motivation This study was developed because the recognized need of defining of a new spacecraft architecture suitable for aneutronic fusion and featuring game-changing space travel capabilities. The core of this architecture is the definition of a new kind of fusion-based space propulsion system. This research is not about exploring a new fusion energy concept, it actually assumes the availability of an aneutronic fusion energy reactor. The focus is on providing the best (most efficient) utilization of fusion energy for propulsion purposes. The rationale is that without a proper architecture design even the utilization of a fusion reactor as a prime energy source for spacecraft propulsion is not going to provide the required performances for achieving a substantial change of current space travel capabilities. - Highlights of Research Results This NIAC Phase I study provided led to several findings that provide the foundation for further research leading to a higher TRL: first a quantitative analysis of the intrinsic limitations of a propulsion system that utilizes aneutronic fusion products directly as the exhaust jet for achieving propulsion was carried on. Then, as a natural continuation, a new beam conditioning process for the fusion products was devised to produce an exhaust jet with the required characteristics (both thrust and specific impulse) for the optimal propulsion performances (in essence, an energy-to-thrust direct conversion).
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility of Traveling Wave Direct Energy Conversion of Fission Reaction Fragments
    Proceedings of Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space 2013 Albuquerque, NM, February 25-28, 2013 Paper xxxx Feasibility of Traveling Wave Direct Energy Conversion of Fission Reaction Fragments A. G. Tarditi1, J. A. George2, G. H. Miley3, J. H. Scott2 1Electric Power Research Institute, 942 Corridor Park Boulevard, Knoxville, TN 37932 2NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Code EP3, Houston, TX 77058 3University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 865-360-8328 [email protected] Abstract. Fission fragment direct energy conversion has been considered in the past for the purpose of increasing nuclear power plant efficiency and for advanced space propulsion. Since the fragments carry electric charge (typically in the order of 20 e) and have100 MeV-range kinetic energy, techniques utilizing very high-voltage DC electrodes have been considered. This study is focused on a different approach: the kinetic energy of the charged fission fragments is converted into alternating current by means of a traveling wave coupling scheme (Traveling Wave Direct Energy Converter, TWDEC), thereby not requiring the utilization of high voltage technology. A preliminary feasibility analysis of the concept is introduced based on a conceptual level study and on a particle simulation model of the beam dynamics. Keywords: Fission Fragments, Direct Energy Conversion. INTRODUCTION The possibility of producing electric energy from a fission reaction via a direct conversion process, thus avoiding the heat-engine conversion, has a strong appeal because potential improvements in efficiency and complexity, and because of reduced overall vulnerability of the reactor and to lower waste material activation due to the reduced energy of the fragments after the conversion process.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Conversion of Energy. INSTITUTION Atomic Energy Commission, Washington,D
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 107 521 SE 019 210 AUTHOR Corliss, William R. TITLE Direct Conversion of Energy. INSTITUTION Atomic Energy Commission, Washington,D. C. Office of Information Services. PUB DATE 64 NOTE 41p. AVAILABLE FROM USAEC Technical Information Center,P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (cost to the generalpublic for 1-4. copies, $0.25 ea., 5-99, $0.20ea., 100 or mare, $0.15 ea.) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Electricity; Electronics; *Energy; NuclearPhysics; Physics; *Scientific Research;*Thermodynamics IDENTIFIERS AEC; Atomic Energy Commission ABSTRACT This publication is one ofa series of information booklets for the general public publishedby the United States Atomic Energy Commission. Directenergy conversion Involves energy transformation Without moving parts.The concepts of direct and dynamic energy conversion plus thelaws governing energy conversion are investigated. Among the topics discussedare: Thermoelectricity; Thermionic Conversion; MagnetohydrodynamicConversion; Chemical Batteries; The Fuel Cell; Solar Cells;Nuclear Batteries; Ferroelectric Conversion and ThermomagneticConversion. Five problems related to the reading materialare included. Alist of suggested references concludes this report. Acomplete set of these booklets may be obtained by school and public librarieswithout charge. (BI). It®tr. A 1)+10+ u, OEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EOUCATiON &WELFARE NATIONAL INSTiTUTL OF )1\ EOU CATION ontsocsE 00 OECXUANIC ET Zs.; AHSA et BC EE EIVNE DI PRROOM I) 1 ti L, E PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN + APERSONC IT POINTS OF VIBEW OR OPINIONS STATE() 00 NOT NECESSARILYREPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY ++ + + ++ I++. te t++ + t + tet+ + + +Jo+ ++®+ + -+tot++ +of+ IIet@tetzt\®tet ++ +t 1\®+ t@t®I\ +tot+Soto to+ ()tete+ f+tc)+0, @tiot@+ +®1\+ 1\ bY.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Production with Direct Energy Conversion
    IN/i'F^-- i&C£ FR0200302 •r *-' •V, Power Production With Direct Energy Conversion G. Rochau, R. Lipinski, G. Polansky, D. Seidel, S. Slutz Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185 E-mail: serocha&sandia. sov C. Morrow Morrow Consulting, 916 Monroe NE, Albuquerque, NM 87110 E-mail: Charles. morrow&,xlfunctions, com S. Anghaie University of Florida, P.O. Box 116200, Gainesville, FL 32611-6200 E-mail: anghaie&.ufl. edu D. Seller TSA-3, MS F607, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545 E-mail: [email protected] L. Brown General Atomics, MS 33-1-108, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, CA 92186 E-mail: Llo yd. Browndcb.gat. com T. Parish Nucl. Engr. Dept, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 7843-3133 E-mail: tap(a).trinity.tamu.edu Key Words: Conversion, Power, Generation Introduction The United States Department of Energy, Nuclear Research Initiative (NERI) Direct Energy Conversion (DEC) project has as its goal the development of a direct energy conversion process suitable for commercial development. We define direct energy conversion as any fission process that returns usable energy without using an intermediate thermal process. Enough of the project, one third, has been done to indicate that a viable direct energy device is possible. This paper reports on the progress of the DEC project. It includes a short project description, an abbreviated summary of the work completed to date, a description of ongoing and future project activities, and a discussion of the potential for future research and development. Readers interested in technical details are referred to references [1] and [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into Direct Energy Conversion With
    INVESTIGATION INTO DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION WITH MEDIUM ENERGY HELIUM-ION BEAMS A Thesis by AVERY ALLAN GUILD-BINGHAM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2004 Major Subject: Nuclear Engineering INVESTIGATION INTO DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION WITH MEDIUM ENERGY HELIUM-ION BEAMS A Thesis by AVERY ALLAN GUILD-BINGHAM Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________ _______________________________ Ron R. Hart Francis J. Narcowich (Chair of Committee) (Member) _______________________________ _______________________________ Leslie A. Braby William E. Burchill (Member) (Department Head) December 2004 Major Subject: Nuclear Engineering iii ABSTRACT Investigation into Direct Energy Conversion with Medium Energy Helium-Ion Beams. (December 2004) Avery Guild-Bingham, B.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Ron R. Hart The Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy Research Initiative (NERI) Direct Energy Conversion project has identified the fission fragment magnetic collimator reactor (FFMCR) as a promising direct fission fragment conversion concept. The US DOE NERI Proof-of-Principle Project at Texas A&M is focused on experimental verification of FFMCR operation principles. The purpose of this experiment was to test design parameters of a scaled prototype of a direct energy collector chamber of the FFMCR. The charge collection efficiency was found using a He + ion beam to be approximately 88% for beam energies ranging from 20 to 80 keV. The 2.4 10 12 ± 10% ohm resistor used in the experiment holds-up under the stress of high voltage to 40 kV.
    [Show full text]
  • Helium-3 the Energy Source of Tomorrow?
    Helium-3 The energy source of tomorrow? By Jeff Bonde & Anthony Tortorello The Different Types of Fusion Problems with the D-T fuel cycle The Deuterium-Tritium fuel cycle has some inherent problems that might be extremely difficult to overcome: •It releases eighty percent of its energy in a stream of high- energy neutrons. •This necessitates recapture of the neutrons and then inefficient thermal conversion of their energy to electrical power. •These neutrons are highly destructive to anything they strike, including the containment vessel. •Radiation damage to structures may weaken them and leave highly radioactive waste behind •Tritium is a highly radioactive isotope of hydrogen that is hard to contain with the risk of release. If not D-T then what? Twenty years ago a group of scientists met at a retreat south of Madison, Wisconsin to discuss the problems with the Deuterium-Tritium fuel cycle for fusion. They talked over what the options are for a better fuel. Helium-3 is what they came up with. In fact, helium-3 is the perfect fusion fuel. It can produce an incredible amount of power with absolutely no radioactivity. And a helium-3 fusion reactor won't have the same containment issues either. Deuterium-Helium-3 Deuterium-Helium-3 Because D-He-3 Fusion involves 3 protons as opposed to 2 with DT Fusion, the amount of heat required for good fusion parameters is 100 keV. This is about 10 times greater than the amount needed for DT fusion. At the Naka Fusion Center in Japan, scientists set the world record for the hottest plasma in their advanced tokamak JT-60.
    [Show full text]
  • Fission Fragment Direct Energy Conversion (FFDEC) Into Electricity Can Dramatically Improve the Specific Mass of Fission-Based Electric Propulsion Rocket
    Magnetic Collector for Traveling Wave Direct Energy Conversion of Fission Reaction Fragments A. G. Tarditi1, J. H. Scott2 1Electric Power Research Institute,, Knoxville, TN 2NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, Code EP3, Houston, TX NETS 2015, Albuquerque, NM, February 2015 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Acknowledgement .Work performed under contract from NASA Johnson Space Center, Propulsion and Power , Energy Conversion branch (EP3) 2 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Summary . Fission fragment direct energy conversion (FFDEC) into electricity can dramatically improve the specific mass of fission-based electric propulsion rocket . This study is focused on the conversion via traveling wave DEC, that has the advantage of being able to generate high frequency power (MHz range) and does not require high voltage technology, unlike electrostatic energy conversion. The FFDEC is considered as a best fit to an accelerator-driven fission core to improve the efficiency and the overall specific mass . Future work: – Fragment extraction – Neutralization issues 3 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Introduction Goal: improve drastically the fission-electric rocket specific mass to reach .The problem of fragment extraction: need a thin core .Fission criticality: presence of a moderator impacts system mass .Solution: – Subcritical fission core (thin, light), neutron source driver, electrical power re-circulating from FFDEC – Interesting analogy: for a fusion reactor DEC requires aneutronic fusion, that also requires a driven system 4 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Fission Fragment Direct Energy Conversion is not a New idea 5 © 2015 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Space Nuclear Reactors from Fiction to Reality
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Physics Procedia 20 (2011) 270–292 Space, Propulsion & Energy Sciences International Forum - 2011 Advanced Space Nuclear Reactors from Fiction to Reality L. Popa-Simil* LAVM LLC. , ,Los Alamos NM, 87544 Abstract The advanced nuclear power sources are used in a large variety of science fiction movies and novels, but their practical development is, still, in its early conceptual stages, some of the ideas being confirmed by collateral experiments. The novel reactor concept uses the direct conversion of nuclear energy into electricity, has electronic control of reactivity, being surrounded by a transmutation blanket and very thin shielding being small and light that at its very limit may be suitable to power an autonomously flying car. It also provides an improved fuel cycle producing minimal negative impact to environment. The key elements started to lose the fiction attributes, becoming viable actual concepts and goals for the developments to come, and on the possibility to achieve these objectives started to become more real because the theory shows that using the novel nano-technologies this novel reactor might be achievable in less than a century. ©© 20112011 Published Published by by Elsevier Elsevier B.V. B.V. Selection Selection and/or and/or peer-review peer-review under responsibility under respon ofsibility Institute of forInstitute Advanced for studiesAdvanced in Space, Studies Propulsion in the Space, and EnergyPropulsion Sciences and Energy Sciences PACS: 28.41.-i, 28.52.-s, 81.07.-b, 62.23.St, 81.05.Xj, 78.67.Pt Keywords: Direct Conversion; Nuclear Energy; Electricity; Channeling; Nano-Structures; Nano-Guides; Space Power 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Conversion of Fusion Energy Master Project in Physicalelectrotechnology
    k-,, - - l 4- /- - - 9 - 4 4 Lor- - Zoo 3 - TRITA-ALF-2003-02 ISK Report CCH ISSN 1102-2051 ONSI ISRN KTH/ALF/--03/2--SE KTH a Now! "lo Ml Direct Conversion of Fusion Energy Master Project in PhysicalElectrotechnology Markus Johansson KFAWMMOUNIAM Research and Training programme on CONTROLLED THERMONUCLEAR FUSION AND PLASMA PHYSICS (Association EURATOMINFR) FUSION PLASM PHYSICS ALFVtN LABORATORY ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM SWEDEN Direct conversion of fusion energy Markus Johansson Department of Fusion Plasma Physics, Alfv6n Laboratory Royal Institute of Technology, SE - 00 44 STOCKHOLM, Sweden Master Project in Physical Electrotechnology Supervisor: Associate Professor Jan Scheffel March 3 2003 Printed v The Alfv6n aboratory Division of Fusion Plasma Phvslcs Royal nstitute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm Abstract Deuterium and tritium are expected to be used as fuel in the first fusion reactors. Energy is released as kinetic energy of ions and neutrons, when deuterium reacts with tritium. One way to convert the kinetic energy to electrical energy, is to let the ions and neutrons hit the reactor wall and convert the heat that is caused by the particle bombardment to electrical energy with ordinary thermal conversion. If the kinetic energy of the ions instead is converted directly to electrical energy, a higher efficiency of the energy conversion is possible. The ma- jority of the fusion energy is released as kinetic energy of neutrons, when deuterium reacts with tritium. Fusion reactions such as the D-D reactions, the D_3He reaction and the p-1113 reaction, where a larger part of the fu- sion energy becomes kinetic energy of charged particles, appears therefore more suitable for direct conversion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field-Reversed Configuration As a Practical Fusion Reactor Core
    The Field-Reversed Configuration (FRC) as a Practical Fusion Reactor Core Edward DeWit, Jordan Morelli Department of Physics, Engineering Physics, and Astronomy Queen’s University, Kingston, ON CAP Congress June 4, 2019 Outline Topics to be discussed • The case for fusion • Basic fusion physics • Basic FRC description • Brief history of FRC research • Technical benefits of the FRC • Results from TAE • Edge-biasing experiment • Summary and conclusion FIG: Conceptual drawing of the field-reversed configuration (FRC) 2 The case for fusion 3 The world needs energy Worst case Global energy consumption until 2100. Realistic scenario IIASA–WEC Study “Do nothing” “Global Energy Perspectives” Best case ≈ 2 × 4 Kikuchi, M., Lackner, K., and Tran, M. Q. (2012). Traditional sources of energy Fossil fuels are • In limited supply • Polluting • Geographically contested • Archaic 5 Traditional sources of energy (cont’d.) Solar and wind are • Intermittent • Low density 6 Traditional sources of energy (cont’d.) Nuclear fission is dangerous • Radioactive waste • Meltdown scenarios • Proliferation of weapons 7 Nuclear fusion Benefits of nuclear fusion • Energy dense • Unlimited, low cost fuel supply • No proliferation issues • No possibility of meltdown • No long-lived radioactive waste • Thermal or direct energy conversion options 8 Basic fusion physics 9 Fusion in the sun Proton-proton chain reaction 4 + 4푝 → 퐻푒 + 2푒 + 2휈푒 10 Fusion fuel 11 Kikuchi, M., Lackner, K., and Tran, M. Q. (2012). Main approaches to fusion on Earth https://www.iter.org/ https://lasers.llnl.gov/ Magnetic confinement fusion Inertial confinement fusion 12 Maxwell-Boltzmann and nuclear potential 13 Chen, F. F. Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion, volume 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Ii Direct Energy Conversion Thermal Sources
    AG-81 PART II DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION THERMAL SOURCES SECTION A ENERGY SOURCES NUCLEAR SOURCE LIMITATIONS FOR DIRECT CONVERSION DEVICES R. W. BTJSSARD Space Technology Laboratories, Thompson Rama Wooldridge, Inc. Nuclear energy sources from solid-fuel fission reactors to eventual fusion reactors are considered for application to direct conversion. Brief review of system operating requirements provides a background for assessment of the potentialities and inherent physical limitations of these sources for direct conversion. Emphasis is placed on the characteristics of solid-fuel and gaseous-fuel fission reactors for application to ther- mionic and MHD conversion systems. Upper limits of operating temperature are shown to range from 2700'C to 3700 0C with the best solid fuels (U-loaded C to TaG and HfC) thus allowing Carnot cycle efficiencies of 50 per cent to 65 per cent to be considered for space applications and 80 per cent to 90 per cent for ground applications. For the former it is more important to achieve high cycle efficiency relative to Carnot efficiency than for the latter class of systems. The advantages of high-temperature source opera- tion are negated unless high relative efficiency is achieved. Analysis of gaseous-fuel plasma production shows that the upper limit temperature capability depends upon the type of conversion cycle of interest (i.e. continuous flow vs pulsed operation), and that thermal radiationfrom the plasma becomes the dominant irreversible loss mechanism at extreme temperatures. Typically, peak temperatures of i0,000°K to 40,000°K maybe attainable. These potential upper limits are so high that Carnot efficiencies in the order of 90 per cent are available, thus the prin- cipal problem of achieving high over-all conversion efficiency rests with the choice of conversion cycle.
    [Show full text]