DOCSLIB.ORG

'We Discharge Ourselves on Both Sides': Vorticism: New Perspectives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'We Discharge Ourselves on Both Sides': Vorticism: New Perspectives ‘We discharge ourselves on both sides’: Vorticism: New Perspectives (A symposium convened October 29-30, 2010, at the Nasher Museum of Duke University, Durham, NC) ________ Michael Valdez Moses The Vorticists: Rebel Artists in London and New York, 1914-1918 , the only major exhibition of Vorticist art to be held in the United States since John Quinn and Ezra Pound organized the first American show of Vorticist art at the Penguin Club of New York in 1917, opened at the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University on September 30. Curated by Mark Antliff (Professor of Art History at Duke University) and Vivien Greene (Curator of the Guggenheim Museum in New York City), this major exhibition of England’s only ‘home-grown’ avant-garde art movement brings together many of the works exhibited at the three exhibitions organized by the various members of the Vorticist movement during its brief existence: the first Vorticist exhibition at the Doré Gallery in London in 1915, the 1917 Penguin Club exhibition in New York City, and the exhibition of Alvin Langdon Coburn’s ‘Vortographs’ (Vorticist photographs) held at the London Camera Club in 1917. The Vorticists runs at the Nasher through to the 2 nd of January 2010 before moving to the Guggenheim in Venice and then to Tate Britain. The exhibition displays sculpture, paintings, watercolours, collages, prints, drawings, vortographs, books, and journals produced by a group of artists and writers, including Wyndham Lewis, Jacob Epstein, Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, David Bomberg, Lawrence Atkinson, Christopher Nevinson, Edward Wadsworth, Alvin Langdon Coburn, Helen Saunders, Frederick Etchells, Jessica Dismorr, Dorothy Shakespear, William Roberts, and Ezra Pound, who loosely comprised, or were closely associated with, the Vorticist movement that briefly flourished in London and (to a lesser extent) New York in the second decade of the past century. 150 ‘We discharge ourselves on both sides’ In conjunction with the exhibit that showcases such epochal works as Epstein’s Rock Drill and Female Figure in Flenite, Gaudier- Brzeska’s (Hieratic) Head of Ezra Pound and Red Stone Dancer , Wyndham Lewis’s The Crowd , Helen Saunders’s Dance , and a first edition of BLAST 1, Mark Antliff and Scott Klein (Associate Professor and Chair of the English Department at Wake Forest University) organized a symposium held on October 29 th and 30 th 2010 at Duke University entitled Vorticism: New Perspectives (from which an edited anthology of papers is currently being derived). Participants included Mark Antliff, Scott Klein, Paul Edwards, Fredric Jameson, Rebecca Beasley, Andrzej G Ċsiorek, Jonathan Black, Jonathan Wood, Allan Antliff, Miranda Hickman, Anne McCauley, Douglas Mao, Martin Puchner, and Sarah Stanners. In one of two keynote addresses, ‘ BLAST and Vorticism Exploded’, Edwards posed a series of questions that haunted the proceedings: Was Vorticism a coherent aesthetic movement? Was there anything that united the various works and projects of such a varied array of artists? Were there any integral or essential features that defined Vorticist painting, sculpture, photography, and literature? Was Vorticism anything more than (Wyndham Lewis’s) one-man movement? Edwards’s address emphasized the improvisatory and heterogeneous character of Vorticism as Lewis, Pound, and others developed it between 1913 and 1915. Edwards shed light on the byzantine and highly contingent manner in which the first issue of BLAST was assembled. As Edwards pointedly noted, the prints that appeared in the first July 1914 issue were set or commissioned long before the Vorticist manifestos that appeared in the volume were composed; indeed Lewis put together the issue in three distinct stages over six months, and it was only during the last phase of assemblage, some months after the initial plans for BLAST had been made and well after much of the first number had already been set, that Lewis introduced the critical terms ‘Vortex’ and ‘Vorticism’ into the issue. According to Edwards, ‘Vorticism’ was a kind of belated or last minute coinage that reflected Lewis’s response to immediate and rapidly changing circumstances, such as his break with Marinetti and Italian Futurism that had occurred in June of 1914, months after the assemblage of BLAST 1 was underway. The first exhibition of Vorticist art at the Doré Gallery in London in 1915 offers further evidence of the ad hoc, fluid, and internally conflicted character of a movement that reflected the shifting loyalties, tactical alliances, and widespread rivalries of its numerous participants. The 1915 Doré Gallery show included works not only by self-identified Vorticists du jour 151 Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies such as Lewis, Gaudier-Brzeska, Dismorr, Etchells, Wadsworth, Saunders, and Roberts, but also works by ‘invited’ artists, including Nevinson, who considered himself a Futurist (and who had fallen out with Lewis in June of 1914), and the Post-Impressionist painter, Duncan Grant, a representative of the Bloomsbury school that had come in for harsh treatment in the first issue of BLAST . To make matters even murkier, Epstein’s sculptures were conspicuously absent from the 1915 exhibition. Edwards thus made a persuasive case that Vorticism should be understood not so much as a theoretically consistent and internally cohesive literary and art movement, but rather as a revolutionary process the outcome of which could not be predicted even by those who were its principal architects and practitioners. But if Vorticism was not an ideologically coherent movement (whose chief theoreticians and promoters were Lewis and Pound), it was a literary and artistic practice deeply, even fatally, entangled with a profoundly theoretical approach to art and culture. In fact, the incoherent and inchoate character of the movement perhaps owed much to its (over) investment in many different and sometimes contradictory theories. Mark Antliff’s paper, ‘Politicizing the New Sculpture’, explored Pound’s and Gaudier-Brzeska’s indebtedness to the anarcho- individualist and nominalist theories of Dora Marsden (editor of the journals The Freewoman and The Egoist ), who was in turn inspired by the philosophic writings of Max Stirner and Henri Bergson. Alan Antliff, in his talk, ‘Man Ray – Vorticist’, likewise emphasized the indirect influences of Stirner’s anarcho-individualist philosophy and the aesthetic writings of Wilhelm Worringer and Friedrich Nietzsche on the early paintings of Man Ray, who in 1914 and 1915 followed a Vorticist trajectory before coming under the influence of Marcel Duchamp and moving off in the direction of an anti-formalist aesthetic. But these quite varied theoretical sources were by no means the only ideological wellsprings for Vorticism as the movement changed, developed, sub- divided, and ultimately expired between 1913 and 1919. As Fredric Jameson, in the second keynote address, ‘Odious Combinations: Visualizing the Political in Words’, emphasized, Wyndham Lewis’s extensive theoretical writings were indebted to a bewildering array of thinkers. Even a casual reader of The Art of Being Ruled (1926) and Time and Western Man (1927), both published some years after Vorticism had played itself out as a vital movement, can discern in Lewis’s thought the influences not only of Bergson, Nietzsche, William James, and Alfred North Whitehead – whose ‘time’ philosophies Lewis explicitly rejects – 152 ‘We discharge ourselves on both sides’ but also those of Plato, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Rousseau, de Tocqueville, Marx, Henry Maine, Proudhon, Vladimir Lenin, Le Bon, and Sorel, to name only a few of the most conspicuous thinkers whose writings exerted a fascination, though not always an attraction, for the ex-arch- Vorticist. Jameson’s critical assessment of Lewis’s political theorizing as ‘intellectual doodling’, while denying to it any stringent philosophic coherence, nonetheless emphasized that Lewis’s early opinionated, gossipy, and often satiric forays into aesthetic criticism, like his somewhat later ones into political philosophy, provide the necessary background for any informed appreciation of Lewis’s momentous contributions to avant-garde art in the 1910s and after. One important insight that thus emerged from the papers delivered was the notion that the aesthetic practices of the Vorticists crucially depended on their absorption and/or rejection of a multitude of competing theories about the nature of modern art and the relationship of the artist to modernity. In his talk, ‘Modern Art in England circa 1914: Hulme and Lewis’, Andrzej G Ċsiorek laid emphasis upon the ways in which Lewis’s negotiation of a unique space for Vorticism (between those already occupied by Cubism and Futurism) involved an intense exchange with the aesthetic and cultural criticism of T. E. Hulme. Lewis attempted retrospectively (and perhaps inaccurately or even disingenuously) to ally his own Vorticist paintings with Hulme’s celebration of geometric and abstract art. But whereas Hulme was committed to an anti-humanist, anti-progressive revolution in Western metaphysics, one that would shatter the hold of Renaissance humanism upon the European imagination, Lewis seemed intent upon creating an objective, geometric, and abstract art that directly confronted and made use of the forms of the contemporary machine age. As opposed to Hulme, who explicitly sought to overcome modernity, Lewis understood his Vorticist aesthetic as the means of representing (however critically) the distinctive forms of modern life. A decisive break with the modern age was, for Lewis, not possible, nor was its evasion desirable. But if, according to G Ċsiorek, Lewis ultimately distanced himself from Hulme’s critical pronouncements, his own art was no less a response to Hulme’s theoretical provocation. Even when seeking to practise his art, Lewis necessarily had to negotiate a cultural environment in which theory was inescapable. Unlike Elizabethan theatre or the Victorian novel, but very much in the germinal spirit of early seventeenth-century Italian opera or European romantic poetry, 153 Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies Vorticism was a movement that emerged from the theoretical debates and philosophical issues that provided the matrix of its birth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art by Adam Mccauley
    The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art Adam McCauley, Studio Art- Painting Pope Wright, MS, Department of Fine Arts ABSTRACT Through my research I wanted to find out the ideas and meanings that the originators of non- objective art had. In my research I also wanted to find out what were the artists’ meanings be it symbolic or geometric, ideas behind composition, and the reasons for such a dramatic break from the academic tradition in painting and the arts. Throughout the research I also looked into the resulting conflicts that this style of art had with critics, academia, and ultimately governments. Ultimately I wanted to understand if this style of art could be continued in the Post-Modern era and if it could continue its vitality in the arts today as it did in the past. Introduction Modern art has been characterized by upheavals, break-ups, rejection, acceptance, and innovations. During the 20th century the development and innovations of art could be compared to that of science. Science made huge leaps and bounds; so did art. The innovations in travel and flight, the finding of new cures for disease, and splitting the atom all affected the artists and their work. Innovative artists and their ideas spurred revolutionary art and followers. In Paris, Pablo Picasso had fragmented form with the Cubists. In Italy, there was Giacomo Balla and his Futurist movement. In Germany, Wassily Kandinsky was working with the group the Blue Rider (Der Blaue Reiter), and in Russia Kazimer Malevich was working in a style that he called Suprematism.
    [Show full text]
  • Bideford Bay (1946) David Bomberg
    Chapter 5: Compositional Effects of Color Color (hue, chroma and value) effect the perception of space… …both 2D… (shapes can be made to seem larger or smaller by altering color) …and 3D (advancing and receding). The size of colored regions also effects the perceived color (larger areas seem brighter). Aerial Perspective or Atmospheric Perspective • (both phrases refer to the same phenomena – they are interchangeable terms) • Several color effects can be described in terms of Aerial perspective. • — Colors tend to be lighter and lower in chroma in the distance. (color moves closer to sky color) • — Contrast in value diminishes in the distance. (value range diminishes in distance) • — Sharp contrasting edge tends to bring (at least) one surface forward. (sharp detail or edges advance forms; blurred forms recede) The Space Between • The physical cause of atmospheric perspective in nature is dust and moisture in the air. • These scattered particles diffuse light, thereby softening the appearance of distant objects and causing their color to move closer to the prevailing sky color. • The Moisture-filled Space Between • Fog is an atmosphere densely filled with moisture – atmospheric perspective can be apparent at a very short distance. • Albert Bierstadt’s 19th c. paintings of the American West were composed to express the vast space open to expansion. • Aerial Perspective • Lighter values, reduced contrast, lower chroma all tend to establish a sense receding (distant) space. • Limited structure and detail are present — there are David Bomberg no linear perspective clues to structure, location, size or distance. Yet there is a definite sense of space— near regions and far regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Intangible Heritage(S): an Interplay of Design, Social and Cultural Critiques of the Built Environment
    TANGIBLE - INTANGIBLE HERITAGE(S): AN INTERPLAY OF DESIGN, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CRITIQUES OF THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT • Paper / Proposal Title: ‘ARCHITECTS – WHERE IS YOUR VORTEX? VORTICISM, THE CITY AND URBAN EXPERIENCE • Author(s) Name: Dr. JONATHAN BLACK FRSA • University or Company Affiliation: KINGSTON SCHOOL OF ART, KINGSTON UNIVERSITY • Presentation Method. I would like to: i. present in person (with/without a written paper)* • Abstract (300 words): From its conception in the spring of 1914 the British avant garde art movement known as Vorticism was obsessed with the city and urban existence as central to the forward march of technologically innovative modernity. Indeed, the movement largely owed its very name to the American poet Ezra Pound having already identified London as the ‘great modern vortex’, the end point for all the energies of modern life and of British/Imperial power. My paper is rooted in many years of research into Vorticism and British Art before, during and after the First World War. It will focus on some of the many images that evoked the strikingly positive Vorticist vision of the city – one that as much looked to the example of vertically vertiginous New York as that by experimental thinkers on the European continent – by leading adherents of the movement such as: Wyndham Lewis, Edward Wadsworth, Frederick Etchells, Jessica Dismorr and Helen Saunders. Living in London much of their imagery was indebted to that city. However, examples will be discussed alongside a group of woodcut prints produced c. 1914-18 by Wadsworth inspired by the cities and industrial towns of his native Yorkshire such as Leeds, Bradford, Halifax and Huddersfield.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernist Ekphrasis and Museum Politics
    1 BEYOND THE FRAME: MODERNIST EKPHRASIS AND MUSEUM POLITICS A dissertation presented By Frank Robert Capogna to The Department of English In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the field of English Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April 2017 2 BEYOND THE FRAME: MODERNIST EKPHRASIS AND MUSEUM POLITICS A dissertation presented By Frank Robert Capogna ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University April 2017 3 ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that the public art museum and its practices of collecting, organizing, and defining cultures at once enabled and constrained the poetic forms and subjects available to American and British poets of a transatlantic long modernist period. I trace these lines of influence particularly as they shape modernist engagements with ekphrasis, the historical genre of poetry that describes, contemplates, or interrogates a visual art object. Drawing on a range of materials and theoretical formations—from archival documents that attest to modernist poets’ lived experiences in museums and galleries to Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of art and critical scholarship in the field of Museum Studies—I situate modernist ekphrastic poetry in relation to developments in twentieth-century museology and to the revolutionary literary and visual aesthetics of early twentieth-century modernism. This juxtaposition reveals how modern poets revised the conventions of, and recalibrated the expectations for, ekphrastic poetry to evaluate the museum’s cultural capital and its then common marginalization of the art and experiences of female subjects, queer subjects, and subjects of color.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2
    MIT 4.602, Modern Art and Mass Culture (HASS-D) Spring 2004 Professor Caroline A. Jones Lecture Notes History, Theory and Criticism Section, Department of Architecture Week 9, Lecture 2 PHOTOGRAPHY, PROPAGANDA, MONTAGE: Soviet Avant-Garde “We are all primitives of the 20th century” – Ivan Kliun, 1916 UNOVIS members’ aims include the “study of the system of Suprematist projection and the designing of blueprints and plans in accordance with it; ruling off the earth’s expanse into squares, giving each energy cell its place in the overall scheme; organization and accommodation on the earth’s surface of all its intrinsic elements, charting those points and lines out of which the forms of Suprematism will ascend and slip into space.” — Ilya Chashnik , 1921 I. Making “Modern Man” A. Kasimir Malevich – Suprematism 1) Suprematism begins ca. 1913, influenced by Cubo-Futurism 2) Suprematism officially launched, 1915 – manifesto and exhibition titled “0.10 The Last Futurist Exhibition” in Petrograd. B. El (Elazar) Lissitzky 1) “Proun” as utopia 2) Types, and the new modern man C. Modern Woman? 1) Sonia Terk Delaunay in Paris a) “Orphism” or “organic Cubism” 1911 b) “Simultaneous” clothing, ceramics, textiles, cars 1913-20s 2) Natalia Goncharova, “Rayonism” 3) Lyubov Popova, Varvara Stepanova stage designs II. Monuments without Beards -- Vladimir Tatlin A. Constructivism (developed in parallel with Suprematism as sculptural variant) B. Productivism (the tweaking of “l’art pour l’art” to be more socialist) C. Monument to the Third International (Tatlin’s Tower), 1921 III. Collapse of the Avant-Garde? A. 1937 Paris Exposition, 1937 Entartete Kunst, 1939 Popular Front B.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release NEW RHYTHMS Henri Gaudier-Brzeska
    Press Release New Exhibition performances of the Ballets Russes is brought to the fore through his bronze Firebird (1912). As well as exploring dance New Rhythms will investigate the artist’s wider NEW RHYTHMS fascination with motion, and the physical dynamism of bodily movement – new rhythms that are communicated Henri Gaudier-Brzeska: through sculpture and many of the artist’s drawings. The new dance trends that exploded onto pre‐war Art, Dance and Movement London stages and screens such as Apache dance from Paris, Tango and Ragtime and performances by the in London 1911-1915 Ballets Russes, will be represented through photographs, printed sources and film. The show culminates by asking Tuesday 17 March 2014 –– how Gaudier‐Brzeska’s dancers can inspire new rhythms now, through a contemporary dance and music Sunday 21 June 2015 commission. The work by Malgorzata Dzierzon, performed to new music commissioned from emerging In spring 2015 Kettle’s Yard will present a major composer Kate Whitley, will feature in the exhibition exhibition to mark the centenary of the death in the First through film. World War of the French-born sculptor and draughtsman This will be the final exhibition at Kettle’s Yard before Henri Gaudier-Brzeska (1891‐1915). Gaudier-Brzeska closing for a major development of the site and offers a moved permanently to London in January 1911. He chance for visitors to enjoy the house and an exhibition made a significant contribution to the development of intimately linked to it and the permanent collection. For modern sculpture, as one of the key members of the more about the development plans and off site activity Vorticist movement and by influencing a later generation see our website: www.kettlesyard.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • [Jargon Society]
    OCCASIONAL LIST / BOSTON BOOK FAIR / NOV. 13-15, 2009 JAMES S. JAFFE RARE BOOKS 790 Madison Ave, Suite 605 New York, New York 10065 Tel 212-988-8042 Fax 212-988-8044 Email: [email protected] Please visit our website: www.jamesjaffe.com Member Antiquarian Booksellers Association of America / International League of Antiquarian Booksellers These and other books will be available in Booth 314. It is advisable to place any orders during the fair by calling us at 610-637-3531. All books and manuscripts are offered subject to prior sale. Libraries will be billed to suit their budgets. Digital images are available upon request. 1. ALGREN, Nelson. Somebody in Boots. 8vo, original terracotta cloth, dust jacket. N.Y.: The Vanguard Press, (1935). First edition of Algren’s rare first book which served as the genesis for A Walk on the Wild Side (1956). Signed by Algren on the title page and additionally inscribed by him at a later date (1978) on the front free endpaper: “For Christine and Robert Liska from Nelson Algren June 1978”. Algren has incorporated a drawing of a cat in his inscription. Nelson Ahlgren Abraham was born in Detroit in 1909, and later adopted a modified form of his Swedish grandfather’s name. He grew up in Chicago, and earned a B.A. in Journalism from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in 1931. In 1933, he moved to Texas to find work, and began his literary career living in a derelict gas station. A short story, “So Help Me”, was accepted by Story magazine and led to an advance of $100.00 for his first book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Joan and Lester Avnet Collection in the Museum of Modern Art : Exhibited, Apr
    A Treasury of modern drawing : the Joan and Lester Avnet Collection in the Museum of Modern Art : exhibited, Apr. 27-July 4, 1978 William S. Lieberman Date 1978 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art ISBN 08707060980 Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/2355 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history—from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art A TREASURY OF MODERN I DRAWING THE JOANAND LESTER AVNET COLLECTION Archive MoMA 1210 ft TREASURY OF MODERN DRAWING A TREASURY OF MODERN DRAWING THE JOANAND LESTER AVNET COLLECTION IN THE MUSEUMOF MODERNART WILLIAMS.LIEBERMAN THE MUSEUM OFMODERN ART, NEW YORK 4«-CH'«C lAOrf/) 12-10 MUSEUM OF MODERNART LIBRARY Copyright © 1978 by The Museum of Modern Art All rights reserved The Museum of Modern Art 11 West 53 Street New York, N.Y. 10019 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 78-50658 ISBN: 0-87070-609-8 Designed by Steven Schoenfelder Printed by Meriden Gravure Co., Meriden, Conn. Bound by Sendor Bindery, Inc., New York, N.Y. Printed in the United States of America cover Matisse: The Necklace. 1950. Brush and ink, ioVz x i6Vi" frontispiece Feininger: The Town ofLegefeld. 1916. Pen and ink, charcoal, 9 Vi x 12V2" INTRODUCTION 7 ILLUSTRATIONS 35 CA TALOG OF THE COLLECTION 108 Lester Avnet was a devoted son, brother, husband, and father. His life was dedicated to his family; indeed he thought more often of them, always with pride, than he did of himself.
    [Show full text]
  • Else Alfelt, Lotti Van Der Gaag, and Defining Cobra
    WAS THE MATTER SETTLED? ELSE ALFELT, LOTTI VAN DER GAAG, AND DEFINING COBRA Kari Boroff A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2020 Committee: Katerina Ruedi Ray, Advisor Mille Guldbeck Andrew Hershberger © 2020 Kari Boroff All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katerina Ruedi Ray, Advisor The CoBrA art movement (1948-1951) stands prominently among the few European avant-garde groups formed in the aftermath of World War II. Emphasizing international collaboration, rejecting the past, and embracing spontaneity and intuition, CoBrA artists created artworks expressing fundamental human creativity. Although the group was dominated by men, a small number of women were associated with CoBrA, two of whom continue to be the subject of debate within CoBrA scholarship to this day: the Danish painter Else Alfelt (1910-1974) and the Dutch sculptor Lotti van der Gaag (1923-1999), known as “Lotti.” In contributing to this debate, I address the work and CoBrA membership status of Alfelt and Lotti by comparing their artworks to CoBrA’s two main manifestoes, texts that together provide the clearest definition of the group’s overall ideas and theories. Alfelt, while recognized as a full CoBrA member, created structured, geometric paintings, influenced by German Expressionism and traditional Japanese art; I thus argue that her work does not fit the group’s formal aesthetic or philosophy. Conversely Lotti, who was never asked to join CoBrA, and was rejected from exhibiting with the group, produced sculptures with rough, intuitive, and childlike forms that clearly do fit CoBrA’s ideas as presented in its two manifestoes.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Innovators' Fame
    Elements of Innovators’ Fame: Social Structure, Identity and Creativity Mitali Banerjee Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Columbia University 2017 © 2017 Mitali Banerjee All rights reserved Abstract Elements of Innovators’ Fame: Social Structure, Identity and Creativity Mitali Banerjee What makes an innovator famous? This is the principal question of this dissertation. I examine three potential drivers of the innovators’ fame – their social structure, creativity and identity. My empirical context is the early 20th century abstract artists in 1910-25. The period represents a paradigmatic shift in the history of modern art, the emergence of the abstract art movement. In chapter 2, I operationalize social structure by an innovator’s local peer network. I find that an innovator with structurally and compositionally diverse local network is likely to be more famous than the one with a homogenous local network. I find no statistical evidence for creativity as a link between social structure and fame. Instead, the evidence suggests that an innovator’s creative identity and access to promotional opportunities are the key drivers of her fame. In Chapter 3, I find that the creativity identity resulting from an innovator’s creative trajectory can lead to obscurity despite early fame and acclaim. The drastic change in the nature of a producer’s output can dilute her identity and cost her her niche. In combination with her peer network characteristics, these dynamics can mean obscurity even for talented and prolific innovators. In chapter 4, I undertake a large-scale analysis of the relationship between creativity and fame.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubism, Vorticism and Vocabulary Quiz
    Cubism, Vorticism and Vocabulary Quiz Please read the information and look at the images on the Google Slides document about Cubism and Vorticism before answering these questions. 1. In which country did Cubism begin? a. Germany b. Italy c. France 2. Which sorts of shapes are mainly used in Cubist artwork? a. Wavy and swirly lines which are repeated b. Cubes and other geometric shapes c. Curved shapes such as circles and ovals 3. What kinds of colours were mainly used in Analytical Cubist artwork? a. Primary b. Monochrome c. Complementary 4. What is the correct definition of a collage? a. When pieces of paper are used to create an image b. When a variety of materials are used in an artwork c. When a variety of pencil tones are used in an artwork 5. In what kind of Cubism did Picasso use collage? a. Material Cubism b. Synthetic Cubism c. Chemical Cubism 6. Vorticism was partly inspired by which of these Art movements? a. Pop Art and Realism b. Surrealism and Op Art c. Cubism and Futurism 7. What kinds of lines were mainly used in Vorticist artwork? a. Straight lines with sharp angles b. Curving lines with swirls c. Wavy and scalloped lines 8. Which of these words links with this image? (Choose 2) a. Geometric - made up of clear lines and shapes such as squares and b. triangles. c. Symmetrical - something being exactly the same on opposite sides. d. Modern - something from present or recent times. 9. Which of these words links with this image? (Choose 2) a.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyndham Lewis and Nihilism
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Groningen University of Groningen Theo van Doesburg and Wyndham Lewis Renders, Hans; van Faassen, Sjoerd Published in: The Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2018 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Renders, H., & van Faassen, S. (2018). Theo van Doesburg and Wyndham Lewis: An Aborted Attempt at Collaboration’. The Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies, 8, 30-56. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 13-11-2019 The Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies Wyndham Lewis Society Volume 8 (2017) ISSN 2052-5168 THE JOURNAL OF WYNDHAM LEWIS STUDIES PUBLISHED BY THE WYNDHAM LEWIS SOCIETY EDITORIAL ADDRESS The Journal of Wyndham Lewis Studies c/o Dr Nathan Waddell Department of English Literature, Arts Building University of Birmingham, Edgbaston Birmingham, B13 2TT EDITORS Zoe Gosling, Louise Kane, Michael Shallcross, Nathan Waddell REVIEWS EDITOR James Hirst EDITORIAL BOARD Rebecca Beasley, Peter Brooker, Peter Caracciolo, Edward Chaney, Paul Edwards, C.
    [Show full text]