Modernist Ekphrasis and Museum Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modernist Ekphrasis and Museum Politics 1 BEYOND THE FRAME: MODERNIST EKPHRASIS AND MUSEUM POLITICS A dissertation presented By Frank Robert Capogna to The Department of English In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the field of English Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts April 2017 2 BEYOND THE FRAME: MODERNIST EKPHRASIS AND MUSEUM POLITICS A dissertation presented By Frank Robert Capogna ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University April 2017 3 ABSTRACT This dissertation argues that the public art museum and its practices of collecting, organizing, and defining cultures at once enabled and constrained the poetic forms and subjects available to American and British poets of a transatlantic long modernist period. I trace these lines of influence particularly as they shape modernist engagements with ekphrasis, the historical genre of poetry that describes, contemplates, or interrogates a visual art object. Drawing on a range of materials and theoretical formations—from archival documents that attest to modernist poets’ lived experiences in museums and galleries to Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology of art and critical scholarship in the field of Museum Studies—I situate modernist ekphrastic poetry in relation to developments in twentieth-century museology and to the revolutionary literary and visual aesthetics of early twentieth-century modernism. This juxtaposition reveals how modern poets revised the conventions of, and recalibrated the expectations for, ekphrastic poetry to evaluate the museum’s cultural capital and its then common marginalization of the art and experiences of female subjects, queer subjects, and subjects of color. Analyzing the ekphrastic poetry of Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper, Marianne Moore, Siegfried Sassoon, H. D., and Melvin Tolson, “Beyond the Frame” asserts that these poets radically reconstitute the poetics of ekphrasis by locating their poetic speakers within museums and attending to their critical acts of looking at art on display. In the process, their ekphrastic poems convey aesthetic meanings— anti-heteronormative, anti-colonial, and anti- racist—that undermine the museum’s exclusionary framings of cultural history. Contributing to recent conversations in the New Modernist Studies on the public institutions that shaped the development of modernism, and in Historical Poetics on the synchronic and culturally contingent nature of poetic genres, I show modernist ekphrasis to be representative of the ways in which the 4 modernist literary field was constituted in unsettled relation to the forms of institutional authority and cultural capital against which it is often defined. “Beyond the Frame” thus offers a new perspective on the intersections among poetic discourse, visual culture, and cultural institutions in modernist poetry, and a context for historicizing turn-of-the-century public art museums through poems written in and about objects in their collections. 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation is a monument to the care, energy, and support invested in it by so many individuals whom I can only begin to thank. I am particularly grateful to my dissertation co- chairs, whose wisdom and shaping hands have been essential to its making. Thank you to Guy Rotella for your steadfast guidance and zeal for pushing me to always read closer and deeper, the results of which are evident on every page. Thank you to Mary Loeffelholz, for your generosity in offering to co-chair my committee at a late stage in the dissertation project, and for your enthusiastic and discerning feedback that has formatively shaped my writing and thinking. Special gratitude is due to Laura Green, who has acted as a formal and informal advisor throughout my graduate studies: thank you for being a believer in me, for your patience in orienting me through academic life, and for always having an open door and an open ear. Thank you to Carrie Preston, for joining this project as an outside reader with blind faith in my ability to carry it out, and for your always perceptive insights. Although not an official member of my committee, Theo Davis has been a consistent champion of my work, and I thank her for the encouragement she has offered me throughout my graduate studies. Thanks are owed, too, to Northeastern’s Humanities Center, and particularly its tireless director, Lori Lefkovitz; the 2016-17 session’s convener, Alisa Lincoln; and the fellows of the “Inclusions and Exclusions” seminar. The resources, feedback, and brilliant conversations provided by a Graduate Fellowship in the Humanities Center during my final year at Northeastern have been vital for finishing the dissertation. It has been a rare pleasure to spend the last six years among the graduate student community in the English Department. Although there are too many to name here, I would like to acknowledge Paul Babin, Erin Frymire, Lauren Kuryloski, Charlie Lesh, Chris Myers, Lauren 6 Thacker, and Michael Turner. The feedback provided by members of Professor Green’s dissertation writer’s group, past and present, have greatly benefitted my project. I am so very grateful as well for the administrative staff of the English Department, and particularly Melissa Daigle and Linda Collins. Thank you to the special collections librarians of the Beinecke Library at Yale University, the Rosenbach Library (especially Elizabeth Fuller), the Houghton Library at Harvard University, and the Berg Collection of British and American Literature at the New York Public Library, for their assistance as I learned (and routinely relearned) what precisely it is that one does in an archive. I would never have made it into graduate school, not to mention to the final throes of dissertation writing, without the encouragement of the English Department and the Honors College at Adelphi University, and I extend special expressions of gratitude to Greg Mercurio, Lahney Preston-Matto, and Louise Geddes for their continued generosity, kindness, and mentorship. Friends back home in New York have been vital reminders of the joys that still remain outside of libraries: thank you to Dan Weprin, for day games at Yankee Stadium and far too many evenings at Sleep No More; to Chris Smith, for always needed levity, for regular (and sometimes willing) accompaniment to museums, and especially for the introduction to Rudy’s; and to Donald McCarthy, if I must. Thank you to my family—to my mother, Debra, and to my aunts (and second mothers), JoAnn and Sue—for your unwavering love and unqualified support for me in my every endeavor. Finally, this dissertation would not have been possible without Sarah Leventer, whose love and affection, care and collaboration, have sustained both it and me; in the pages that follow, hers is “the breath drawn after every line.” 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract 2 Acknowledgements 5 Table of Contents 7 List of Figures 8 Introduction 9 Chapter One: Site, Sight and Song: Placing “Michael Field” 42 Chapter Two: “Something that Makes Me Feel at Home”: Moore’s Ekphrastic Galleries 103 Chapter Three: Museum Politics: Sassoon’s Satirical Poems 159 Chapter Four: The Muse in the Museum: H. D.’s Relational Ekphrasis 207 Chapter Five: Black Aesthetics in the Public Art Museum: Tolson’s Art World Ekphrasis 261 Works Cited 320 8 LIST OF FIGURES 1.1. Pietro Perugino, “Apollo and Marsyas,” c. 1495 66 1.2. A page from Michael Field, Sight and Song, 1892 74 1.3. Bartolomeo Veneto, Idealized Portrait of a Courtesan as Flora, c. 1480-1519 86 1.4. Giorgione, The Sleeping Venus, c. 1510 93 4.1. H. D., outgoing letter to Viola Baxter Jordan (Viola Baxter Jordan Papers, 254 Beinecke Library, Yale University) 5.1. Francisco Goya, The Second of May 1808, 1814 289 5.2. Paolo Veronese, or the Workshop of Veronese, The Daughters of Lot Flee from 294 Sodom, c. 1585 5.3. Tintoretto, Paradise, 1592 295 9 Introduction “Beyond the Frame: Modernist Ekphrasis and Museum Politics” is an inquiry into how six Anglophone modernist poets—working in disparate locales, at disparate times, and with disparate poetic commitments—responded to the public art museum and its practices of collecting, organizing, and displaying cultures, and did so through formal innovations in ekphrasis, the poetic description of a visual art object. Scholars and writers of poetry today typically trace the genealogy of ekphrasis as a branch of lyric poetry: the contemplation of an art object uttered by an undifferentiated, universalized lyric “I” who probes the representational differences between the arts of painting and poetry. In this formulation, the ekphrastic poem occurs within a spaceless and timeless aesthetic realm, turning inward to reflect on the particular stylistic resources of its own medium through comparison to the visual other. “Beyond the Frame” troubles the primacy and singularity of this lyric paradigm in poetic criticism by turning to the work of modern poets who take the conventions of ekphrasis in a different direction. That is, they bring this poetic mode into art museums, in order to attend to their poetic speakers’ local and critical acts of looking at works of art as they are put on exhibition in these spaces. In doing so, these poets reframe ekphrasis into a situation for interrogating then commonly marginalized issues of racial, class, and sexual difference in museum collections. For these diverse poets— from canonical modernists Marianne Moore and H. D.,
Recommended publications
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 24 January 2017 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Harding, J. (2015) 'European Avant-Garde coteries and the Modernist Magazine.', Modernism/modernity., 22 (4). pp. 811-820. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2015.0063 Publisher's copyright statement: Copyright c 2015 by Johns Hopkins University Press. This article rst appeared in Modernism/modernity 22:4 (2015), 811-820. Reprinted with permission by Johns Hopkins University Press. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk European Avant-Garde Coteries and the Modernist Magazine Jason Harding Modernism/modernity, Volume 22, Number 4, November 2015, pp. 811-820 (Review) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2015.0063 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/605720 Access provided by Durham University (24 Jan 2017 12:36 GMT) Review Essay European Avant-Garde Coteries and the Modernist Magazine By Jason Harding, Durham University MODERNISM / modernity The Oxford Critical and Cultural History of Modernist VOLUME TWENTY TWO, Magazines: Volume III, Europe 1880–1940.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2005 Updrafts
    Chaparral from the California Federation of Chaparral Poets, Inc. serving Californiaupdr poets for over 60 yearsaftsVolume 66, No. 3 • April, 2005 President Ted Kooser is Pulitzer Prize Winner James Shuman, PSJ 2005 has been a busy year for Poet Laureate Ted Kooser. On April 7, the Pulitzer commit- First Vice President tee announced that his Delights & Shadows had won the Pulitzer Prize for poetry. And, Jeremy Shuman, PSJ later in the week, he accepted appointment to serve a second term as Poet Laureate. Second Vice President While many previous Poets Laureate have also Katharine Wilson, RF Winners of the Pulitzer Prize receive a $10,000 award. Third Vice President been winners of the Pulitzer, not since 1947 has the Pegasus Buchanan, Tw prize been won by the sitting laureate. In that year, A professor of English at the University of Ne- braska-Lincoln, Kooser’s award-winning book, De- Fourth Vice President Robert Lowell won— and at the time the position Eric Donald, Or was known as the Consultant in Poetry to the Li- lights & Shadows, was published by Copper Canyon Press in 2004. Treasurer brary of Congress. It was not until 1986 that the po- Ursula Gibson, Tw sition became known as the Poet Laureate Consult- “I’m thrilled by this,” Kooser said shortly after Recording Secretary ant in Poetry to the Library of Congress. the announcement. “ It’s something every poet dreams Lee Collins, Tw The 89th annual prizes in Journalism, Letters, of. There are so many gifted poets in this country, Corresponding Secretary Drama and Music were announced by Columbia Uni- and so many marvelous collections published each Dorothy Marshall, Tw versity.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism & Modernist Literature: Introduction
    MODERNISM & MODERNIST LITERATURE: INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION Broadly speaking, ‘modernism’ might be said to have been characterised by a deliberate and often radical shift away from tradition, and consequently by the use of new and innovative forms of expression Thus, many styles in art and literature from the late 19th and early 20th centuries are markedly different from those that preceded them. The term ‘modernism’ generally covers the creative output of artists and thinkers who saw ‘traditional’ approaches to the arts, architecture, literature, religion, social organisation (and even life itself) had become outdated in light of the new economic, social and political circumstances of a by now fully industrialised society. Amid rapid social change and significant developments in science (including the social sciences), modernists found themselves alienated from what might be termed Victorian morality and convention. They duly set about searching for radical responses to the radical changes occurring around them, affirming mankind’s power to shape and influence his environment through experimentation, technology and scientific advancement, while identifying potential obstacles to ‘progress’ in all aspects of existence in order to replace them with updated new alternatives. All the enduring certainties of Enlightenment thinking, and the heretofore unquestioned existence of an all-seeing, all-powerful ‘Creator’ figure, were high on the modernists’ list of dogmas that were now to be challenged, or subverted, perhaps rejected altogether, or, at the very least, reflected upon from a fresh new ‘modernist’ perspective. Not that modernism categorically defied religion or eschewed all the beliefs and ideas associated with the Enlightenment; it would be more accurate to view modernism as a tendency to question, and strive for alternatives to, the convictions of the preceding age.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Field and the Gaze
    Victorian Literature and Culture (2006), 34, 553–571. Printed in the United States of America. Copyright C 2006 Cambridge University Press. 1060-1503/06 $9.50 A VISUAL FIELD: MICHAEL FIELD AND THE GAZE By Hilary Fraser In 1892, Katharine Bradley (1846–1914) and Edith Cooper (1862–1913) published a volume of poetry with the title Sight and Song based on their response to a series of paintings in British and Continental public galleries. Bradley and Cooper, aunt and niece, devoted lovers, who over the three decades of their writing lives produced numerous volumes of poetry and plays collaboratively under the authorial signature “Michael Field,” had already made their name with a volume published in 1889 entitled Long Ago, comprising translations and elaborations of the Sapphic fragments, which has been read as an intriguing and (for the times) audaciously explicit celebration of love between women. The concept of “translation” was as fundamental to the project of Sight and Song as it had been to Long Ago; however, in the later volume it refers not to the literal translation of poetic fragments written in an ancient and other language (as Long Ago ostensibly did) but to the rhetorical act of interpreting visual images. The aim of their new collection of ekphrastic poems was, as they explained in the Preface to Sight and Song, “to translate into verse what the lines and colours of certain chosen pictures sing in themselves” (Michael Field, Sight and Song v). The synaesthetic complexity of Michael Field’s language here suggests the multidimensional sensory experience of looking at and responding to visual art works, something the women try to capture in the various kinds of writing they undertake around the production of this volume – their journal and their letters, as well as the poems themselves – in their attempt to provide such a translation.
    [Show full text]
  • William Carlos Williams' Indian Son(G)
    The News from That Strange, Far Away Land: William Carlos Williams’ Indian Son(g) Graziano Krätli YALE UNIVERSITY 1. In his later years, William Carlos Williams entertained a long epistolary relationship with the Indian poet Srinivas Rayaprol (1925-98), one of a handful who contributed to the modernization of Indian poetry in English in the first few decades after the independence from British rule. The two met only once or twice, but their correspondence, started in the fall of 1949, when Rayaprol was a graduate student at Stanford University, continued long after his return to India, ending only a few years before Williams’ passing. Although Williams had many correspondents in his life, most of them more important and better known literary figures than Rayaprol, the young Indian from the southeastern state of Andhra Pradesh was one of the very few non-Americans and the only one from a postcolonial country with a long and glorious literary tradition of its own. More important, perhaps, their correspondence occurred in a decade – the 1950s – in which a younger generation of Indian poets writing in English was assimilating the lessons of Anglo-American Modernism while increasingly turning their attention away from Britain to America. Rayaprol, doubly advantaged by virtue of “being there” (i.e., in the Bay Area at the beginning of the San Francisco Renaissance) and by his mentoring relationship with Williams, was one of the very first to imbibe the new poetic idiom from its sources, and also one of the most persistent in trying to keep those sources alive and meaningful, to him if not to his fellow poets in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Cubism, Vorticism and Vocabulary Quiz
    Cubism, Vorticism and Vocabulary Quiz Please read the information and look at the images on the Google Slides document about Cubism and Vorticism before answering these questions. 1. In which country did Cubism begin? a. Germany b. Italy c. France 2. Which sorts of shapes are mainly used in Cubist artwork? a. Wavy and swirly lines which are repeated b. Cubes and other geometric shapes c. Curved shapes such as circles and ovals 3. What kinds of colours were mainly used in Analytical Cubist artwork? a. Primary b. Monochrome c. Complementary 4. What is the correct definition of a collage? a. When pieces of paper are used to create an image b. When a variety of materials are used in an artwork c. When a variety of pencil tones are used in an artwork 5. In what kind of Cubism did Picasso use collage? a. Material Cubism b. Synthetic Cubism c. Chemical Cubism 6. Vorticism was partly inspired by which of these Art movements? a. Pop Art and Realism b. Surrealism and Op Art c. Cubism and Futurism 7. What kinds of lines were mainly used in Vorticist artwork? a. Straight lines with sharp angles b. Curving lines with swirls c. Wavy and scalloped lines 8. Which of these words links with this image? (Choose 2) a. Geometric - made up of clear lines and shapes such as squares and b. triangles. c. Symmetrical - something being exactly the same on opposite sides. d. Modern - something from present or recent times. 9. Which of these words links with this image? (Choose 2) a.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: MODERNIST AMERICAN POETRY
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: MODERNIST AMERICAN POETRY AS A STUDY OF OBJECTS Kathleen D’Angelo, Doctor of Philosophy, 2011 Dissertation directed by: Professor Elizabeth Bergmann Loizeaux Department of English In “Modernist American Poetry as a Study of Objects,” I focus on a group of modernist American poets—Robert Frost, Marianne Moore, William Carlos Williams, and George Oppen—who demonstrate an interest in objects and their transformation into aesthetic things. To distinguish between “objects” and “things,” I use “thing theory,” which grew out of the work of Bill Brown and, to date, has not been adequately applied to lyric poetry. While the object represents an entity one encounters in the world, the thing contains diverse associations and meanings that exceed its material function. Among modernist poets, it is essential to study this point of transformation, from object into thing, to examine the “ideas in things” that get invested in this process. Such a study proves necessary in light of the significant role we understand things to play in modernist literature and in the modern era, when subjects were beginning to negotiate selfhood through and against a world of material things. Further, “things” are commonly recognized as a particular focus of modernist poets, thanks in part to Williams’s famous dictate in Paterson, “no ideas but in things.” Poets ranging from Gertrude Stein, Wallace Stevens, Ezra Pound, and T.S. Eliot, in addition to those in my study, all present poems in which things serve as a rhetorical focus. While several critics have acknowledged this modernist fascination, no study has addressed how modernist poets use the thing to resolve personal and poetic preoccupations.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Ronald Mar and the Trope of Life
    11 Ronald Mar and the Trope of Life The Translation of Western Modernist Poetry in Hong Kong Chris Song Abstract This essay examines the Chinese-language debut of Western surrealist poetry in Hong Kong and its effect on the local poetry scene through the work of Ronald Mar 馬朗, from the early years of the Cold War era onward. It traces the trope of poetry being “true to life” – as resistance to the surrealist influence – through evolving notions and experiences of Hong Kong identity over time, up to the present day in the post-handover era. Keywords: Chinese poetry, translation, Ronald Mar, Hong Kong, modern- ism, surrealism Twenty years since the handover of sovereignty from the British Crown to the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong society has known increasingly severe conflicts with China, fueled by animosity toward the mainland among the local population. Growing up in such a politically intense environment, Hong Kong youths feel that political and economic systems have conspired to leave them a hopeless future. As their demand for universal suffrage in the election of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government was denied in September 2014, their anxiety finally broke into realization as the Umbrella Movement. Apart from responding through poetry to this large democratic movement, some young local poets perceived a need to redefine the “localness” of Hong Kong poetry. Though without much theoretical depth, their quest is quite clear: they believe that the localness of their poetic language lies, paradoxically, in the distance from external reality – a symbolic denial of the Umbrella Movement’s failed demands for universal suffrage, or any further realistic democratization, in Van Crevel, Maghiel and Lucas Klein (eds.), Chinese Poetry and Translation: Rights and Wrongs.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Field and Fin De Siecle Culture and Society
    Michael Field and Fin de Siecle Culture and Society MICHAEL FIELD AND FIN-DE-SIECLE CULTURE & SOCIETY The Journals, 1868-1914, and Correspondence of Katharine Bradley and Edith Cooper from the British Library, London Contents listing PUBLISHER'S NOTE EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION BY DR MARION THAIN CONTENTS OF REELS DETAILED LISTING BRIEF CHRONOLOGY Michael Field and Fin de Siecle Culture and Society Publisher's Note The “binary star” – as Browning called them - that was ‘Michael Field’, shone brightly from the first appearance of their play Callirrhoe in 1884 to their deaths in 1913/14. Katharine Harris Bradley (1846-1914) and her niece, Edith Emma Cooper (1862-1913), collaborated in writing verse and drama and were “closer married” than many of their heterosexual friends. They were familiar figures in the art world and were close friends with Berenson and Ruskin. Robert Browning was the first to acclaim their “genius” in poetry and they were widely published in periodicals. Collected volumes of poetry included Bellerophon, Underneath the Bough, Long Ago, Sight and Song, Poems of Adoration and Mystic Trees. They also wrote 27 dramas, mainly based on legends and historical figures, many of which explore the relationship between love and death. Given the range of their interests and the wealth of their connections, they are ideally situated to illuminate many aspects of late Victorian and early Modernist culture. Their diaries and letters are both voluminous and clearly written – yet they have remained inaccessible to most scholars until now. There is much on: Death – which assumed a central role in Victorian culture following the death of Prince Albert in 1861 – is a recurring theme in their diaries and their works.
    [Show full text]
  • 'We Discharge Ourselves on Both Sides': Vorticism: New Perspectives
    ‘We discharge ourselves on both sides’: Vorticism: New Perspectives (A symposium convened October 29-30, 2010, at the Nasher Museum of Duke University, Durham, NC) ________ Michael Valdez Moses The Vorticists: Rebel Artists in London and New York, 1914-1918 , the only major exhibition of Vorticist art to be held in the United States since John Quinn and Ezra Pound organized the first American show of Vorticist art at the Penguin Club of New York in 1917, opened at the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University on September 30. Curated by Mark Antliff (Professor of Art History at Duke University) and Vivien Greene (Curator of the Guggenheim Museum in New York City), this major exhibition of England’s only ‘home-grown’ avant-garde art movement brings together many of the works exhibited at the three exhibitions organized by the various members of the Vorticist movement during its brief existence: the first Vorticist exhibition at the Doré Gallery in London in 1915, the 1917 Penguin Club exhibition in New York City, and the exhibition of Alvin Langdon Coburn’s ‘Vortographs’ (Vorticist photographs) held at the London Camera Club in 1917. The Vorticists runs at the Nasher through to the 2 nd of January 2010 before moving to the Guggenheim in Venice and then to Tate Britain. The exhibition displays sculpture, paintings, watercolours, collages, prints, drawings, vortographs, books, and journals produced by a group of artists and writers, including Wyndham Lewis, Jacob Epstein, Henri Gaudier-Brzeska, David Bomberg, Lawrence Atkinson, Christopher Nevinson, Edward Wadsworth, Alvin Langdon Coburn, Helen Saunders, Frederick Etchells, Jessica Dismorr, Dorothy Shakespear, William Roberts, and Ezra Pound, who loosely comprised, or were closely associated with, the Vorticist movement that briefly flourished in London and (to a lesser extent) New York in the second decade of the past century.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekphrasis and Avant-Garde Prose of 1920S Spain
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Hispanic Studies Hispanic Studies 2015 Ekphrasis and Avant-Garde Prose of 1920s Spain Brian M. Cole University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Cole, Brian M., "Ekphrasis and Avant-Garde Prose of 1920s Spain" (2015). Theses and Dissertations-- Hispanic Studies. 23. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/hisp_etds/23 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Hispanic Studies at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Hispanic Studies by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless an embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREWORD by David Lehman
    FOREWORD by David Lehman Susan Wheeler was telling me about the writing work- shop she took as a Bennington College undergrad- uate in the 1970s. On the Arst day Alvin Feinman, who taught the class, asked the students to bring in their favorite poems. Some fulAlled the assignment with approved masterworks on the order of “East Coker” or the Duino Elegies. Wheeler chose Karl Shapiro’s “Buick,” a “shorter, speedy poem” that seemed “incon- sequential” next to the weighty works of Eliot or Rilke. I like this anecdote not only because it makes its point about not going with the Bow but because in my stu- dent days I, too, had an intense experience with this now neglected poet’s rhapsodic ode to his car. It ex- pressed something real and otherwise overlooked in metrically rich verse: As a sloop with a sweep of immaculate wing on her delicate spine And a keel as steel as a root that holds in the sea as she leans, Leaning and laughing, my warm-hearted beauty, you ride, you ride. Karl Shapiro, who died in May 2000 at the age of eighty-six, wrote other poems imbued with the aura of the 1940s. He portrays American institutions in “Haircut” (“In mirrors of marble and silver I see us for- ever”), “Drug Store” (“They slump in booths like rags, not even drunk”), and “University” (“To hurt the Negro and avoid the Jew / Is the curriculum”). Some of his most admired works bear witness to the casualties of World War II, in which he served.
    [Show full text]