DOCSLIB.ORG

First Steps of the Rousseff Administration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Steps of the Rousseff Administration 6 POLITICS January 2011 First steps of the Rousseff administration Although its first few weeks were marked by disagreements between members of the cabinet, the new administration has begun to lay out its domestic and foreign priorities. The president must quickly establish her authority and communicate clear policies to set the tone of her administration. (Foto:Marcello Casal Jr./ Agencia Brasil) The President Rousseff coordinates the first meeting of her cabinet. n a critical issue for balancing the Government sources say the president budget, Finance Minister Guido did not like these public disagreements. OMantega said that the government Although policy debates are welcome in a would veto any amount over US$320 for the democracy, the administration needs to have minimum wage, while Labor Minister Carlos and communicate transparent and coherent Lupi argued that only Congress can decide on policies so as not to unsettle markets and the adjustment. The government obviously undermine its credibility. needs to give Congress a clear understanding of its position. First cabinet meeting This was not the only public disagreement. At her first cabinet meeting on January 14,, Maria do Rosário, Human Rights Minister, President Rousseff addressed the 2011 budget recommended investigation of cases of the and called for cabinet unity. She intends torture and death of the politically persecuted to take a firm stand on public spending; during the military dictatorship. Gen. Jose Elito, in particular, the government will monitor Chief Minister of Institutional Security, spoke administrative costs rigorously. According to against it. O Estado de S. Paulo newspaper, she warned 7 January 2011 POLITICS that though political appointments will be respected, managers must commit to results and will be held accountable. Photo: Agencia Brasil Ministers will have to set targets for reducing costs and report on progress during the regular cabinet meetings. The problem is that ministries have historically been guided by the interests of party politics. The president’s greatest challenge is to make public services more efficient, cost–effective, and responsive to the needs of the population. Recent flooding in Rio de Janeiro state has Minister of Communications Paulo Bernardo argues for more discussions on the new media regulations. painfully reminded us how inefficient the public sector is. More than 700 people are reported dead, compared to 25 in Media law much worse flooding in Australia. As happens Showing sensitivity to public opinion, the new in many developing countries, most of those administration decided not to immediately affected by the natural disaster are poor send to Congress the draft law to regulate the and live in shantytowns. This tragedy, which media prepared by the Lula administration. recurs regularly in Rio during the rainy season, Members of civil society objected strenuously demonstrates both failure to enforce urban to the draft law, fearing censorship of the media. zoning laws and inadequate government Former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso investment in infrastructure. even said that the way the Lula administration guided the discussion of media regulation and the perception of political meddling in media The president’s greatest affairs raised suspicions of a threat to press freedom. challenge is to make public New Minister of Communications Paulo Bernardo was cautious in addressing the services more efficient, discussion on the media law. In an interview after meeting with President Rousseff, he said that cost–effective, and the bill contains “issues relating to democracy responsive to the needs of itself.” He called for detailed discussion within the government and submission of the draft the population. law to public consultation through the Internet before it is sent to Congress. 8 POLITICS January 2011 Showing sensitivity to public opinion, the new administration Photo: Agencia Brasil decided not to immediately send to Congress the draft law to regulate the media prepared by the Lula Antonio Patriota takes charge of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. administration. Closer ties with the U.S. U.S. President Barack Obama. However, Brazil’s Antonio de Aguiar Patriota has become foreign position on some human rights issues is likely minister. Patriota has held a number of prominent to change. Rousseff criticized the fact that diplomatic positions, having been Brazil’s Brazil abstained from voting on a recent U.N. ambassador to the United States (2007–09), human rights resolution. She affirmed that she Deputy Secretary General for Political Affairs of would have felt uncomfortable as a woman to the Ministry of External Relations, Cabinet Chief say nothing against the stoning of a Muslim of Foreign Minister Celso Amorim, and Secretary woman. General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The expectation is that the new administration will make no bold moves in foreign policy. The expectation is that In an interview with the Washington Post in December, President Rousseff said she the new administration considered the relationship with the U.S. to will make no bold moves be very important to Brazil and she would try to forge closer ties. The president is expected in foreign policy. It will to go to Washington in March to meet with try to forge closer ties with the United States..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • India-Brazil Bilateral Relations Are in a State of Clearly Discernible Upswing
    India-Brazil Relations Political: India-Brazil bilateral relations are in a state of clearly discernible upswing. Although the two countries are divided by geography and distance, they share common democratic values and developmental aspirations. Both are large developing countries, each an important player in its region, both stable, secular, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, large democracies as well as trillion-dollar economies. There has been frequent exchange of VVIP, Ministerial and official-level visits in recent years resulting in strengthening of bilateral relationship in various fields. Jawaharlal Nehru Award for International Understanding for 2006 and Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development for 2010 was conferred on President Lula. Our shared vision of the evolving global order has enabled forging of close cooperation and coordination in the multilateral arena, be in IBSA, BRICS, G-4, BASIC, G-20 or other organizations. VVIP visits from India: Vice President S. Radhakrishnan (1954), Prime Minister Indira Gandhi (1968), Prime Minister Narasimha Rao (1992 - for Earth Summit), President K.R. Narayanan (1998), Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh (2006 and April 2010) ,President Pratibha Patil (2008) and Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh (June 2012-for Rio+20 summit). Other important visits from India in recent years: Kumari Selja, Minister of State of Urban Development and Poverty Alleviation, Mr. Anand Sharma, Minister of State for External Affairs, Mr. Rao Inderjit Singh, Minister of State for Defence Production, Mr. Subodh Kant Sahai, Minister of State for Food Processing Industries, Shri Pranab Mukherjee, Minister of External Affairs (Feb 2008), Shri P. Chidambaram, Finance Minister from India (Nov 2008) and Shri S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAZIL, a LEGITIMATE LEADER: from PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS to PERMANENT VACANCY in the UN SECURITY COUNCIL Giulia Scortegagna1 Jeancezar Ditzz De Souza Ribeiro2
    DOI 10.21544/1809-3191.v25n2.p 492-516 BRAZIL, A LEGITIMATE LEADER: FROM PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS TO PERMANENT VACANCY IN THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL Giulia Scortegagna1 Jeancezar Ditzz de Souza Ribeiro2 ABSTRACT From a brief analysis of its performance in the United Nations Security Council during the 2010-2011 biennium, it is intended to examine the legitimacy of the discourses and leadership of the Brazilian performance in the Council and in Peacekeeping Operations. Brazil, as an actor that values diplomatic and multilateral means, has gained great prominence within the United Nations and its instruments of maintenance of international security. The mission in Haiti, MINUSTAH, had great repercussions, because besides the military component being led by a Brazilian, Brazil was engaged in it in various ways, even emotionally, as said by Chancellor Celso Amorim. But the major problem is: would Brazil be a leader? How did it perform in the years 2010 and 2011, when it was a temporary member of the Security Council? And finally, does its legitimacy emanate from the Missions of Peace? Keywords: Peacekeeping Operations. Brazilian Foreign Policy. Security Council. 1 Bachelor’s degree from the Laureate International Universities (IBMR – Centro Universitário), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] / Orcid: https:// orcid.org/0000-0002-4751-1276 2Doctor. University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] / Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-5640 2 Doctorate Degree. University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: jeanditzz@ hotmail.com / Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-5640 R. Esc.
    [Show full text]
  • Featured Q&A with Our Board of Advisors
    Monday, January 29, 2007 BOARD OF ADVISORS Featured Q&A With Our Board of Advisors Bernard Aronson Peter Hakim Managing Partner, President, Latin America's state-owned mium for multinationals firms to do busi- ACON Investments LLC Inter-American companies are gaining in impor- ness in 'sensitive' sectors, let alone enter Diego Arria Dialogue tance as renewed nationalism into partnership with the state-owned Director, Donna Hrinak has taken hold in several coun- enterprises. Partnerships work best for all Columbus Group Director for Corporate Q tries. But partnerships with the private when there is in place a government that Genaro Arriagada and Govt. Affairs, sector remain key to the success of state- respects private enterprise, the rule of law, Kraft Foods Inc. Board Member, Banco owned enterprises, nearly all government and the sanctity of contracts, and where del Estado de Chile Jon Huenemann officials in the region say publicly. When there is an environment conducive to for- Joyce Chang Principal, and why should a multinational company eign investment. For the multinational International Global Head of decide to seek strategic partnership with firm, the nature of the investment (e.g., Emerging Markets Department, Research, J.P. Morgan Miller & Chevalier state-owned industry players? How can large, export-oriented) as well as the level Chase & Co. James R. Jones these partnerships be structured to be of know-how (technology) and human Adrian Cruz Co-chair, beneficial for all parties, including the capital required (highly skilled technical Founder and Senior Manatt Jones region? Aside from the publicly-owned and managerial people) will determine its Partner, Global Strategies LLC companies, how can the private sector, bargaining position.
    [Show full text]
  • BRAZILIAN POLITICS Agenda and Political Analysis for the Week – Since 1993
    BRAZILIAN POLITICS Agenda and political analysis for the week – Since 1993 Arko Advice Compiled exclusively for Arko Advice clients by Scenarios Murillo de Aragão and Cristiano Noronha & Political Analysis Brasília, DF Sunday, May 7, 2006 - Year XIV – Political Atmosphere for the Week The political week will probably be one of the most agitated due to the No. 972 following events: • Silvio Pereira’s allegations regarding the monthly payoff scandal • The OAB’s (Brazilian Bar Association) decision regarding Lula’s impeachment • PMDB party convention to decide on its own candidacy • Attempt to vote provisional measures in the House and Senate • Attempt to vote the mini tax reform in the House • Interview of the new Central Bank directors by the Senate Economic Affairs Committee • PT party’s decision as to its candidate for the government of São Paulo Issues for the Week Lula’s Impeachment. This Monday, the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) will discuss the initiation of impeachment proceedings against President Lula. Silvio Pereira’s allegations should affect the OAB’s decision, which might take a little more time to ponder the issue. Central Bank. The interviews of Mário Mesquita and Paulo Vieira da Cunha have been scheduled for Tuesday, May 9 by the Senate Economic Affairs Committee as of 10:00 a.m. Mário Mesquita was nominated as Central Bank Director of Special Studies and Paulo Vieira as Central Bank International Affairs Director. Should the nominations be approved, they will follow on to be examined by a floor session, whose agenda is currently blocked by 5 provisional measures. Until these are analyzed the Central Bank directorship nominations cannot be voted.
    [Show full text]
  • Segurança Internacional, Estudos Estratégicos E Política De Defesa
    Belo Horizonte, Coração Eucarístico da PUC Minas, 29 a 31 de julho de 2015 Área temática: Workshop Doutoral – Segurança Internacional, Estudos Estratégicos e Política de Defesa Título do trabalho: A ATUAÇÃO DO BRASIL EM PAZ E SEGURANÇA INTERNACIONAL COMO FONTE DE NOVAS CATEGORIAS DE ANÁLISE PARA A TEORIA DAS RELAÇÕES INTERNACIONAIS Autora: Mariana Alves da Cunha Kalil, Universidade de Brasília (UnB) e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) 2 RESUMO A partir da narrativa sobre a história da política externa brasileira, busca-se compreender se o comportamento do Brasil no cenário internacional enseja o reconhecimento de novas categorias de análise para a Teoria das Relações Internacionais. Delimita-se essa narrativa àquelas acerca de temas sobre paz e segurança internacional, que envolvam, por exemplo, princípios como os de soberania e de não intervenção, sobretudo em arranjos multilaterais. Como agentes constituintes dessa narrativa, selecionam-se as publicações de acadêmicos sobre o tema, os pronunciamentos de autoridades como os Presidentes da República, os Ministros das Relações Exteriores, os plenipotenciários do Estado brasileiro em fóruns como o Conselho de Segurança das Nações Unidas, as notas à imprensa do Ministério das Relações Exteriores, os documentos e as notas lançados pelo Ministério da Defesa e os pronunciamentos do Ministro da Defesa. Foram feitas pesquisas de campo no Haiti, em Dezembro de 2014, e na Missão do Brasil nas Nações Unidas, em Janeiro-Fevereiro de 2015. Busca-se, neste momento, reunir estas oportunidades com as pesquisas em fontes primárias e secundárias em projetos para qualificação no Doutorado em História das Relações Internacionais do Brasil (IRel-UnB), a realizar-se até Novembro de 2015, com ao menos um capítulo da tese também já pronto, como requer o programa.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Foreign Policy in Lula's Brazil
    Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations | e-ISSN 2238-6912 | ISSN 2238-6262| v.1, n.2, Jul-Dec 2012 | p.201-224 MEDIA AND FOREIGN POLICY IN LULA’S BRAZIL Guilherme Stolle Paixão e Casarões1 Introduction The interaction between the mass media and foreign policy in Brazil has always been a delicate one, slight at most times, but never meaningless. It has become commonplace to say that, due to the virtual monopoly the Brazilian Foreign Ministry (Itamaraty) has enjoyed over foreign policymaking from the early days of its most important chancellor, Barão do Rio Branco (1902-1912), public debate on the country’s goals and strategies has never really taken place (CHEIBUB, 1985; LIMA, 2000; FARIA, 2008). Instead, diplomacy has been by far one of the most undisputed public issues throughout the twentieth century, having survived two long authoritarian periods and several political upheavals. When the first civil president was elected in early 1985, after two decades of military regime, he is said to have decided to keep foreign policy untouched for it represented a supra-partisan consensus that had successfully pushed development forward (RICUPERO, 2001). Only recently have some studies unveiled the role of public opinion and the mass media in times when foreign policy goals were subject to controversy (MANZUR, 1999; 2009; FRANCO, 2009; FERREIRA, 2009). What these works suggest is that public debate over foreign policy goals grows more intense as polarization within Itamaraty becomes salient. Although such relationship seems quite obvious at first, it is not that much straightforward for two reasons. 1 Teacher of undergraduate courses in International Relations (Faculdades Integradas Rio Branco - FIRB - and Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado - FAAP) and a post-Graduate (lato sensu) in International Relations at FAAP.
    [Show full text]
  • From Yekaterinburg to Brasilia: BRICS and the G20, Road to Nowhere?
    Article From Yekaterinburg to Brasilia: BRICS and the G20, road to nowhere? DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329202000109 Rev. Bras. Polít. Int., 63(1): e009, 2020 Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional Abstract ISSN 1983-3121 The BRICS have forged a collective identity to become a new driving force http://www.scielo.br/rbpi in Global Governance. They have used bodies such as the G20 to produce changes at global governance levels. This has raised two questions on their Niall Duggan1 role. First, can they hold a common position despite different developmental 1University College Cork, Government, agendas? Second, has the China’s economic leap produced a unique (Chinese) Cork, Ireland agenda rather than a collective (BRICS) one? ([email protected]) ORCID ID: Keywords: BRICS; Emerging powers; China; G20; Global governance. orcid.org/0000-0002-3578-1068 Juan Carlos Ladines Azalia2 2Universidad del Pacifico, International Received: January 15, 2020 Business, Lima, Peru. ([email protected]) Accepted: June 13, 2020 ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9327-9068 Introduction he BRICS differ from one another culturally, politically, and Tdemographically. What these countries do share, however, is an aspiration to be “rule makers” instead of “rule takers” within global governance. The 2009 BRIC summit’s joint declaration outlined foundations for a common “thought” among member states, including the primacy of the rule of law and multilateral diplomacy with a leading role for the UN (Ministério das Relações Exteriores do Brasil 2008, 2). This produced a common standpoint and meant that the BRICS became a new driving force for change within global Copyright: governance, leading to the promotion of South-South cooperation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 September 21, 2007 VIA E-MAIL and FAX Celso Amorim, Foreign
    September 21, 2007 VIA E-MAIL AND FAX Celso Amorim, Foreign Relations Minister, Brazil Dilma Roussef, Presidential Chief-of-Staff, Brazil Your Excellencies: We are writing to express our support for the process initiated in August between the republics of Bolivia and Brazil for the formation of bi-national working groups to assess the potential impacts on Bolivia of the Santo Antônio and Jirau dams on the Madeira River, the Amazon´s principal tributary. Official project studies and independent expert opinions indicate that there is a distinct probability that Bolivia could suffer flooding of territories in Pando province, possibly including the Bruno Racua Wildlife Reserve; loss of fish species and serious impacts on some of the most important fish currently populating the upper Madeira; and health impacts, including proliferation of vectors of malaria and methylation of toxic mercury in the reservoirs. The need for prior assessment of the possibility of negative impacts of this significance using the “precautionary principle” is affirmed in international treaties, including the Montreal Protocol (1987) and the Rio de Janeiro Declaration on Environment and Development (1992). The Convention on Biological Diversity (1992), which both Bolivia and Brazil have subscribed to, holds that sovereign states have “the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction”. As the work of these bilateral working groups moves forward, we trust that representatives of civil society organizations (CSOs) and independent technical experts will be guaranteed participation in this process, and that the working group meetings will be conducted in a transparent manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Brazil and the Nuclear Issues in the Years of the Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva Government
    Artigo Brazil and the nuclear issues in the years of the Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva government (2003-2010) O Brasil e as questões nucleares nos anos do governo de Luís Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010) CARlo PATTI* Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 53 (2): 178-197 [2010] Introduction Since the Brazilian participation in the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission in 1946, Brazilian foreign policy has given special consideration to nuclear issues. In the last sixty years, with democratic and military governments, one of the country’s goals was the development of an autonomous nuclear industry through the acquisition of technology for enriching the uranium found in the country. Brazil was a persistent opponent of the unequal non-proliferation agreement that divided the world into two groups of countries – those with and those without a nuclear military capability, and which reflected the order established by the two Cold War superpowers. The end of the bipolar system marked an important change in the Brazilian attitude. With the process of democratization and the change in the international system, Brazil gradually adhered to the regimes of nuclear non-proliferation, eventually signing the Non-Treaty in 1998, and becoming one of the most significant supporters of global disarmament and denuclearization. During the presidency of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (2003-2010), the nuclear questions continued to have crucial importance for an emerging country such as Brazil. Brazilian diplomacy in fact had played a prominent role in the international negotiations involving atomic issues. Indeed Itamaraty (the Brazilian Ministry for Foreign Affairs) participated not only in the initiatives for strengthening the NPT, with the 2005 and 2010 review conferences, but recently brokered a nuclear deal between the nuclear weapon states (NWS), as well trying to revive the talks with Iran, which has been accused of developing a clandestine nuclear military program.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.From Tegucigalpa to Teheran: Brazil's Diplomacy As an Emerging
    Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional ISSN: 0034-7329 [email protected] Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasil Quirino Steiner, Andrea; de Almeida Medeiros, Marcelo; Mesquita de Souza Lima, Rafael From Tegucigalpa to Teheran: Brazil’s diplomacy as an emerging Western country Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, vol. 57, núm. 1, 2014, pp. 40-58 Instituto Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais Brasília, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=35831639003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative ARTIGO From Tegucigalpa to Teheran: Brazil’s diplomacy as an emerging Western country De Tegucigalpa a Teerã: a diplomacia do Brasil como um país ocidental emergente http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201400103 ANDREA QUIRINO STEINER* MARCELO DE ALMEIDA MEDEIROS** RAFAEL MESQUITA DE SOUZA LIMA*** Rev. Bras. Polít. Int. 57 (1): 40-58 [2014] Introduction For almost two decades—not only due to its economic growth but also because of increasing social and political developments—, Brazil has undeniably arisen as a full-fledged actor in the international scenario. Such a change has certainly been felt by global regimes and by other international actors. For most of the 20th and early 21st century, Brazil’s foreign policy has been characterized by a quest for autonomy (Fonseca Júnior 1998; Magnoli et al. 2000; Lafer 2009), which has been undertaken, according to Vigevani and Cepaluni (2007), through three main approaches: distance, participation and diversification.
    [Show full text]
  • Paulo Bernardo Silva, Ministro Das Comunicações
    Rio, 18 de janeiro de 2011 O currículo do atual ministro das Comunicações, Paulo Bernardo. INSTITUCIONAL TELEBRASIL registra: Paulo Bernardo Silva, ministro das Comunicações Paulo Bernardo Silva, desde primeiro de janeiro deste ano, assumiu a pasta das Comunicações no Governo Dilma Rousseff, eleita 36ª presidente do Brasil. Ele é o 19º ministro que cuida das Comunicações desde a criação do Ministério, e o oitavo, a partir da privatização das telecomunicações. Assumiu a pasta no lugar de José Artur Filardi, ex-chefe de gabinete do ex-ministro Hélio Costa. Veja aqui. A seguir, o curriculum vitae oficial do novo ministro das Comunicações Paulo Bernardo. Paulo Bernardo Silva nasceu, em 10 de março de 1952, na cidade de São Paulo (SP). Bancário, foi eleito deputado federal pelo PT do Paraná para a primeira legislatura de 1991 a 1995. Foi reeleito, em 1994, para o segundo mandato, no qual foi vice-líder do PT e presidente da Comissão de Fiscalização Financeira e Controle. Em 1999, assumiu o cargo de secretário de Fazenda do Estado do Mato Grosso do Sul, onde permaneceu até o fim de 2000. Foi ainda secretário de Fazenda do município de Londrina, de janeiro de 2001 a março de 2002. Em 2002, foi eleito para o seu terceiro mandato, ocupando cargos de destaque na Câmara Federal. Foi, novamente, vice-líder do PT e presidente da Comissão Mista de Planos, Orçamentos Públicos e Fiscalização. Licenciou-se em março 2005 para assumir o Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Em primeiro de janeiro de 2011, tomou posse como ministro das Comunicações. Carreira legislativa O atual ministro das Comunicações é um político brasileiro, filiado ao Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT) desde 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • 47746729.Pdf
    Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management Minister of Planning, Budget and Management PAULO BERNARDO SILVA Executive Secretary JOÃO BERNARDO DE AZEVEDO BRINGEL Secretary of the Federal Budget CÉLIA CORRÊA Deputy Secretaries CLAUDIANO MANOEL DE ALBUQUERQUE ELIOMAR WESLEY AYRES DA FONSECA RIOS GEORGE ALBERTO AGUIAR SOARES Directors BRUNO CÉSAR GROSSI DE SOUZA – DECON FELIPE DARUICH NETO – DEPES JOSÉ GERALDO FRANÇA DINIZ – DESOC JOSE ROBERTO PAIVA FERNANDES JÚNIOR - DEINF Coaching Staff ALEXANDRE PAULO MAIA ANDRÉ GUIMARÃES RESENDE MARTINS DO VALLE CATARINA MENDONÇA FERREIRA LIMA PINHEIRO CLAUDETE HIDEKO FUKUNISHI CLAUDINEI FERRARI ÉMERSON GUIMARÃES DAL SECCHI FERNANDO MARQUES DA SILVEIRA GERALDO JULIÃO JÚNIOR JANAÍNA THAINES MOREIRA JOELMA MEDEIROS HENRIQUES JOSÉ RICARDO DE SOUZA GALDINO LEILA BARBIERI DE MATOS FROSSARD LEONARDO CAVALCANTI MÉLO LÚCIA HELENA CAVALCANTE VALVERDE MÁRCIO LUIZ DE ALBUQUERQUE OLIVEIRA Information: www.portalsof.planejamento.gov.br Secretary of the Federal Budget SEPN 516 - Bloc D, lot 8, 70770524 – Brasília – DF Phone.: 55+ (61) 2020-2480 Suggestions and/or Reviews: [email protected] PRESENTATION The budget is the document that establishes who will apply the taxes and other revenues the government collects. Understanding how this activity works and participate in its conduct, directly or indirectly, is an essential condition for the effective exercise of citizenship. In recent years there has been increasing the demand for transparency in public affairs, especially in economic and financial issues of government. Informing the public is fundamental to the social control of the state. However, it is also a significant challenge for those who are in charge of this purpose. It is operating a set of data too extensive and highly complex.
    [Show full text]