Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Introduction 1. GOALS This monograph is an attempt at presenting the development of the Nile Delta in the Predynastic period. Particular attention will be paid to the role played by the contacts between the Delta communities and the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age societies from Southern Levant. Many researchers of the ancient Near East have already presented their interpretations of the Egyptian-Southern Levantine contacts. They concentrate primarily on analyzing im- ports from Southern Levant found in Egypt, dated to the Protodynastic period and the beginnings of the Early Dynastic period, as well as Egyptian imports in Southern Levant dated to the end of the Early Bronze Age I and Early Bronze Age II (i.e. Yadin 1955; Yeivin 1960; 1967; 1968; Ward 1963: 1-4; 1964: 121-135; Amiran 1970; 1974; Gophna 1976; 1987; 1992; 1995b; Ben-Tor 1982; 1986; 1991; Tutundžić 1985; 1989; Brandl 1992; van den Brink 1992b; 2002; Andelković 1995; de Miroshedji & Sadek 2000a; 2000b; 2005; de Miroschedji et al. 2001; Hartung 2001; Kansa & Levy 2002; Levy & van den Brink 2002; Paz et al. 2005; van den Brink & Gophna 2004; Braun 2004; 2011; van den Brink & Braun 2006; Braun & van den Brink 2008; Dessel 2009; Sowada 2009; Czarnowicz 2011). Thus far, more com- prehensive attempts at interpreting Egyptian-Southern Levantine relationships in the early Predynastic period have not been taken, mostly due to the scarcity of source materials. However, intensified excavations in the Nile Delta and today’s Israel and Jordan in the re- cent years have brought materials that shed new light on the origins of Egyptian-Canaanite contacts (Mączyńska 2006; 2008; Braun & van den Brink 2008; Czarnowicz 2012b). This monograph is intended to fill in the gap in the research on the prehistoric Nile Delta and its contacts with Southern Levant. The sources used by the author include materials from 24 sites in the Nile Delta, where traces of the Lower Egyptian culture have been discovered (Fig. 1; Tab. 1; cf. Mączyńska 2011: tab. 1). However, only 7 of those have seen a comprehensive publication of all mate- rials, addressing the most important aspects of the said culture. These are: Maadi – settle- ment and cemetery (Rizkana & Seeher 1987; 1988; 1989; 1990), Buto settlement (von der Way 1997; Faltings 1998ab; Köhler 1998), Tell el-Iswid (van den Brink 1989), Tell Ibrahim Awad (van den Brink 1992b), Tell el-Farkha (Chłodnicki et al. 2012) and cemeteries in Wadi 16 Lower EGYPTIAN COMMUNITIES AND THEIR Interactions WITH SOUTHERN Levant Figure 1. Lower Egypt in the Predynastic period. Digla (Rizkana & Seeher 1990), Heliopolis (Debono & Mortensen 1988). A considerable delay between the excavations on the one hand and the corresponding publications on the other causes certain difficulties e.g. in the cases of Maadi, Heliopolis and es-Staff sites (Debono & Mortensen 1988; Habachi & Kaiser 1985; Rizkana & Seeher 1987; 1988; 1989). Some materials from the most recent research projects still await proper publication and are currently available in the form of detailed excavation reports only, e.g. Tell el-Masha’la (Rampersad 2006), Kom el-Khilgan (Buchez & Midant-Reynes 2007; 2011; Midant-Reynes et al. 2004), Sais (Wilson & Gilbert 2003; Wilson 2006); Tell el-Iswid1 (Midant-Reynes 2007; 1 Excavations of the French Institute of Oriental Archaeology (IFAO) in Cairo under the direction of M. Beatrix Midant-Reynes. Introduction 17 Table 1. Sites of the Lower Egyptian culture. NO. SITE NAME SITE TYPE REFERENCES von der Way 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1992ab, 1993, 1997; 1 Buto I-IIIa settlement Faltings 1998ab, 2003; Faltings & Köhler 1996; Köhler 1998 2 Beni Amir cemetery el-Moneim 1996 3 Ezbet el-Qerdahi settlement Wunderlich 1988; Wunderlich et al. 1989 4 Giza settlement? Mortensen 1985; el-Sanussi & Jones 1997; Scharff 1928 5 Heliopolis cemetery Debono & Mortensen 1988 6 Kom el-Kanater settlement? Levy & van den Brink 2002 Buchez & Midant-Reynes 2007, Midant-Reynes et al. 2004; 7 Kom el-Khilgan cemetery Tristant et al. 2008; Menghin & Amer 1932, 1936; Badawi 1987, Rizkana & settlement, 8 Maadi Seeher 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990; Caneva et al. 1987, Watrin cemetery 2000; Hartung 2004 Hansen 1965, 1967; Brewer & Wenke 1992; 9 Mendes B3 settlement Friedman 1992 10 Merimde Beni-Salame cemetery? Badawi 1980 11 Mersa Matruh A/600 cemetery? Bates 1915; 1927; Levy & van den Brink 2002 12 Minshat Abu Omar I cemetery Kroeper & Wildung 1994; 2000; Kroeper 2004 13 Qasr Qarun settlement? Caton Thompson & Gardner 1934; Wenke et al. 1983 14 es-Saff cemetery Habachi & Kaiser 1985; 15 Sais settlement Wilson 2006; Wilson & Gilbert 2003 16 Sedment J settlement? Petrie & Brunton 1924ab; Williams 1982 17 Tell el-Fara’un – el-Husseiniya cemetery Levy & van den Brink 2002 18 Tell el-Masha’la settlement Rampersad 2006 19 Tell el-Murra settlement Jucha pers. comm. 20 Tell el-Farkha 1-3 settlement Chłodnicki et al. 2012 21 Tell Ibrahim Awad settlement van den Brink 1989, 1992b; van Haarlem 1998;. 22 Tell el-Iswid 7 settlement van den Brink 1992b; Tristant et al. 2011 23 Tura ? Junker 1912, 1928; Kaiser & Zaugg 1988 24 Wadi Digla cemetery Rizkana & Seeher 1990 Tristant et al. 2011; Guyot in press). An interesting case is that of the cemetery in Minshat Abu Omar, which had been considered as typically Naqadian for many years. Recently however some researchers have claimed that the two oldest groups of graves (I and II) could have belonged to a Lower Egyptian culture community who buried their dead right there, judging by the presence of specific grave goods, such as lemon shaped jars (Köhler 2008: 518-519; Mączyńska in press c). Materials from the other Lower Egyptian culture 18 Lower EGYPTIAN COMMUNITIES AND THEIR Interactions WITH SOUTHERN Levant Table 2. Sites intentionally excluded from this publication. NAME SITE CHRONOLOGY REFERENCES Mersa Matruh cemetery Merimde culture/Lower Bates 1915; 1927 A/600 (15 graves) Egyptian culture? Tell el-Fara’un/ cemetery Lower Egyptian culture? Levy & van den Brink 2002: 11 el-Husseiniya Kom el-Kanater settlement Lower Egyptian culture? Levy & van den Brink 2002: 11 sites relied on by the author have been published incompletely, with emphasis on selected aspects only (e.g. Engelbach 1923; Caton-Thompson & Gardner 1934; Badawi 1980; Wil- liams 1982 ; el-Moneim 1996). This results first of all from the fragmentary and accidental nature of the finds (Giza, Tura), small scale of research (Ezbet el-Qerdahi) or mistaken chronology of finds (Haraga, Qasr Qarun, Sedment J). In the last case, chronology was verified on the basis of pottery analysis, as no archive information about stratigraphy, con- text, etc. was available. Materials from sites of uncertain or unspecified chronology, only available as enigmatic or brief excavation reports, were not taken into account (Tab. 2). The Lower Egyptian culture, when identified in the 1930s, was first referred to as Maadi culture, named so after the first site bearing the traces of this culture’s activity. In this way it became one of the four cultural units discovered in the first half of the 20th century in the Nile Delta. Not unlike Faiyumian, Merimde and el-Omari cultures, Maadi units were known from a single site only and seemed a part of the cultural tradition of the first farming communities in Lower Egypt. This situation changed in the 1980s, when intensive surveys and excavations began in the Delta area. Traces of Maadi culture were then discovered on Buto site. Excavations by the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) showed that Maadi culture was much more diverse than originally believed. As a result, the name was changed to Maadi-Buto culture. The following years brought the discoveries of new sites of the same culture: Tell el-Iswid, Tell Ibrahim Awad, Tell el-Farkha, Sais and Kom el-Khilgan. Researchers quickly realized that the phenomenon in question was quite different from the three other Neolithic cultures, as it was strongly diversified and its geographic range covered nearly the entire Delta. When the original views on Maadi-Buto culture were revised, it was necessary to update its name, so reminiscent of the first farming communities in the Delta. The term “Lower Egyptian culture” was coined in the literature (cf. von der Way 1992b: 217; Ciałowicz 1999; 2001; Buchez & Midant-Reynes 2011; Mączyńska 2011), making it clearly different from the traditions of Faiyumian, Merimde and el-Omari cultures. Although the term “Maadi-Buto” is still used frequently, the author insists on using the name Lower Egyptian culture in this monograph, as it is more adequate for the culture’s character (see also Mączyńska 2011). Introduction 19 2. CHRONOLOGicAL RANGE The Lower Egyptian culture appeared in the Delta area in the beginning of the 4th millen- nium BC. Radiocarbon dating allows to see the culture in the period between 3800 and 3300/3200 BC, corresponding to the period from Naqada I to beg. Naqada IIIA in the rela- tive Upper Egyptian chronology (Ciałowicz 1999: 46; Watrin 2000: 170-173). The genesis of the Lower Egyptian culture has not been fully explained yet. There is no cultural continuity between the Lower Egyptian society and its predecessors, i.e. Faiyumian, Merimde and el- Omari communities. However, analyses of the oldest Lower Egyptian pottery from Haraga and Sedement J revealed coexistence of features associated with cultural traditions of early Predynastic Lower Egypt (Williams 1982: 216-219; 221). Most researchers believe that the beginnings of the Lower Egyptian culture are linked to the influence of multiple early Neo- lithic cultural traditions, including Merimde and el-Omari (Levy & van den Brink 2002: 10). An analysis of Lower Egyptian culture materials allows one to discern a clear develop- mental pattern. Table 3 presents the division of the said development as used herein. It is based on both the newest results of studies carried out on Tell el-Farkha site and on the results of analyses of materials from other, previously known Lower Egyptian sites.
Recommended publications
  • The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
    J Archaeol Res DOI 10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation Alice Stevenson1 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract When the archaeology of Predynastic Egypt was last appraised in this journal, Savage (2001a, p. 101) expressed optimism that ‘‘a consensus appears to be developing that stresses the gradual development of complex society in Egypt.’’ The picture today is less clear, with new data and alternative theoretical frameworks challenging received wisdom over the pace, direction, and nature of complex social change. Rather than an inexorable march to the beat of the neo-evolutionary drum, primary state formation in Egypt can be seen as a more syncopated phenomenon, characterized by periods of political experimentation and shifting social boundaries. Notably, field projects in Sudan and the Egyptian Delta together with new dating techniques have set older narratives of development into broader frames of refer- ence. In contrast to syntheses that have sought to measure abstract thresholds of complexity, this review of the period between c. 4500 BC and c. 3000 BC tran- scends analytical categories by adopting a practice-based examination of multiple dimensions of social inequality and by considering how the early state may have become a lived reality in Egypt around the end of the fourth millennium BC. Keywords State formation Á Social complexity Á Neo-evolutionary theory Á Practice theory Á Kingship Á Predynastic Egypt Introduction Forty years ago, the sociologist Abrams (1988, p. 63) famously spoke of the difficulty of studying that most ‘‘spurious of sociological objects’’—the modern state.
    [Show full text]
  • Cover Page the Handle
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/42753 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Moezel, K.V.J. van der Title: Of marks and meaning : a palaeographic, semiotic-cognitive, and comparative analysis of the identity marks from Deir el-Medina Issue Date: 2016-09-07 2 THE ORIGIN OF THE MARKS Identity marks have been used throughout Egyptian history. They are amply attested at several sites in Egypt, in the Early Dynastic Period as potmarks, and in the Old, Middle and New Kingdoms as potmarks, builders’ and quarry marks. The use of identity marks for individual workmen, however, and the extent to which they were used on ostraca for administrative purposes are peculiar to Deir el-Medina and the Theban necropolis. Also, the intensity of applying the marks in private context on personal objects such as neck supports, pots, bowls, stools, combs and linen found in the village, the workmen’s huts as well as in tombs, and their use in graffiti throughout the Theban mountains is unique for the community. How can we explain this? To what extent are the marks from Deir el-Medina a continuation of earlier practices? Why and when do we begin to observe the trend toward individuality and personal use? In this chapter we discuss the marks from the Theban necropolis in a broader Egyptian context in order to find out how the system came about, in form as well as in function and usage. We begin with a discussion of potmarks (section 1), followed by a discussion of builders’ marks (section 2), and finally a discussion of quarry marks (section 3).
    [Show full text]
  • I General for Place Names See Also Maps and Their Keys
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-12098-2 - Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology Edited by Paul T. Nicholson and Ian Shaw Index More information Index I General For place names see also maps and their keys. AAS see atomic absorption specrophotometry Tomb E21 52 aerenchyma 229 Abbad region 161 Tomb W2 315 Aeschynomene elaphroxylon 336 Abdel ‘AI, 1. 51 Tomb 113 A’09 332 Afghanistan 39, 435, 436, 443 abesh 591 Umm el-Qa’ab, 63, 79, 363, 496, 577, 582, African black wood 338–9, 339 Abies 445 591, 594, 631, 637 African iron wood 338–9, 339 A. cilicica 348, 431–2, 443, 447 Tomb Q 62 agate 15, 21, 25, 26, 27 A. cilicica cilicica 431 Tomb U-j 582 Agatharchides 162 A. cilicica isaurica 431 Cemetery U 79 agathic acid 453 A. nordmanniana 431 Abyssinia 46 Agathis 453, 464 abietane 445, 454 acacia 91, 148, 305, 335–6, 335, 344, 367, 487, Agricultural Museum, Dokki (Cairo) 558, 559, abietic acid 445, 450, 453 489 564, 632, 634, 666 abrasive 329, 356 Acacia 335, 476–7, 488, 491, 586 agriculture 228, 247, 341, 344, 391, 505, Abrak 148 A. albida 335, 477 506, 510, 515, 517, 521, 526, 528, 569, Abri-Delgo Reach 323 A. arabica 477 583, 584, 609, 615, 616, 617, 628, 637, absorption spectrophotometry 500 A. arabica var. adansoniana 477 647, 656 Abu (Elephantine) 323 A. farnesiana 477 agrimi 327 Abu Aggag formation 54, 55 A. nilotica 279, 335, 354, 367, 477, 488 A Group 323 Abu Ghalib 541 A. nilotica leiocarpa 477 Ahmose (Amarna oªcial) 115 Abu Gurob 410 A.
    [Show full text]
  • “Nothing Is Impossible” – the Professor and the Academy 10 KAROL MYŚLIWIEC
    CENTRE D’ARCHÉOLOGIE MÉDITERRANÉENNE DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XIX 2001 KAROL MYŚLIWIEC “Nothing is impossible” – the Professor and the Academy 10 KAROL MYŚLIWIEC Professor Kazimierz Micha³owski, the Father of Mediterranean Archaeology in Po- land, was a man of belief. Although he believed in various things, one of his most fre- quently repeated principles was that everything is possible, if one desires it enough. Nothing illustrates this better than his own biography. He never gave up, not even in the long years of complete darkness (19391956), when cherishing any hope in Poland seemed rather naive and ridiculous. As soon as the slightest ray of light had appeared on the horizon, he immediately ran towards it with the enthusiasm of a child, forgetting that he was al- ready fifty six years old. What is more, this was happening more than fifteen years after the outbreak of World War II had dramatically interrupted his activities in the Mediterra- nean (in Edfu). Younger generations can hardly imagine the post-war reality, when merely obtaining permission to visit a Western country became an event comparable to todays expeditions to the moon, and many scholars were completely deprived of that possibility for politicals reasons. 1. Faras 1961. Professor at work, studying pharaonic blocks. (Phot. T. Biniewski). THE PROFESSOR AND THE ACADEMY 11 After the political thaw in Poland in 1956, Professor Micha³owski, already Vice- director of the National Museum in Warsaw and Professor at Warsaw University, immedi- ately started to prepare a comeback to Egypt and to other countries of the Mediterranean.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Pyramids Oi.Uchicago.Edu
    oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids oi.uchicago.edu before the pyramids baked clay, squat, round-bottomed, ledge rim jar. 12.3 x 14.9 cm. Naqada iiC. oim e26239 (photo by anna ressman) 2 oi.uchicago.edu Before the pyramids the origins of egyptian civilization edited by emily teeter oriental institute museum puBlications 33 the oriental institute of the university of chicago oi.uchicago.edu Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922920 ISBN-10: 1-885923-82-1 ISBN-13: 978-1-885923-82-0 © 2011 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2011. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago This volume has been published in conjunction with the exhibition Before the Pyramids: The Origins of Egyptian Civilization March 28–December 31, 2011 Oriental Institute Museum Publications 33 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban Rebecca Cain and Michael Lavoie assisted in the production of this volume. Published by The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1155 East 58th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA oi.uchicago.edu For Tom and Linda Illustration Credits Front cover illustration: Painted vessel (Catalog No. 2). Cover design by Brian Zimerle Catalog Nos. 1–79, 82–129: Photos by Anna Ressman Catalog Nos. 80–81: Courtesy of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Printed by M&G Graphics, Chicago, Illinois. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Service — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984 ∞ oi.uchicago.edu book title TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. Gil J.
    [Show full text]
  • Predynastic Burials
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Predynastic Burials Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2m3463b2 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Stevenson, Alice Publication Date 2009-12-05 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California PREDYNASTIC BURIALS دفنات ما قبل التاريخ Alice Stevenson EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Stevenson 2009, Predynastic Burials. UEE. Full Citation: Stevenson, Alice, 2009, Predynastic Burials. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz001nf6jk 1050 Version 1, December 2009 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz001nf6jk PREDYNASTIC BURIALS دفنات ما قبل التاريخ Alice Stevenson Prädynastische Gräber Enterrements à l’époque prédynastique In ancient Egypt, the primary evidence for the Predynastic Period, principally the fourth millennium BCE, derives from burials. In Upper Egypt, there is a clear trend over the period towards greater investment in mortuary facilities and rituals, experimentation in body treatments, and increasing disparity in burial form and content between a small number of elite and a larger non-elite population. In Maadi/Buto contexts in Lower Egypt, pit burials remained simple with minimal differentiation and less of a focus upon display-orientated rituals. يأتي الكم اﻷكبر من الدﻻئل اﻷثرية التي تشھد على عصر ما قبل التاريخ (القرن الرابع قبل الميﻻد) من الدفنات، فيوجد بمصر العليا اھتمام واضح خﻻل ھذه الفترة الزمنية باﻻماكن الجنائزية والطقوس، واختبار طرق جديدة لمعالجة اﻷجساد، ويظھر أيضاً بھذا الوقت فجوة كبيرة ما بين دفنات علية القوم واﻷغلبية العظمى من عامة الشعب.
    [Show full text]
  • Kolodziejczyk
    Lower Egypt in modern research on state formation in Egypt Piotr Kołodziejczyk In the mid of september 2005 in Tulouse (France) the II-nd International Conference “Predynastic and Early Dynastic Egypt - Origin of the State” has ended. The first conference, which took place in Cracow in 2002 gave a new impulse for researchers and scientists dealing with all the aspects of the origin of state of pharaohs. Until quite lately the Nile Delta was one of white spot’s on the archeological map of Egypt. It is obvious today that last years brought great changes in research progress and in our knowledge on this area. This progress requires verification of many theory‘s about participation of the Nile Delta in the Egyptian state formation. The history of research on prepharaonic Egypt reaches second half of the 19th century and its beginnings and biggest discoveries are related with Upper Egypt. First finds from the second half of the 19th century were not correctly classified. Between 1894 – 1895 the large predynastic cemetaries in Naqada and Ballas were excavated by W.M.F. Petrie i J.E. Quibell. These investigations brought about new discoveries which became a base for the new Petrie’s theory about new race that possessed Egypt during the Middle Kingdom period. After several years of investigations which included excavations in Abadieh and Hu cemeteries (1901) and under influence of J. De Morgan’s work (1896-1897) who was the first one having remarked the existence of earlier stages, Petrie verified his former views and linked up those early finds with predynastic period.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Qnd Lhe Leuqnt
    Egyptqnd lhe leuqnt INTERRETATIONSFROMTHE 4TH THROUGH THE EARTY 3RDMITTENNIUM BCE Edited by Edwin C. M. vqn den Brink ond Thomqs E. Lery LeicesterUniversity Press London. New York TheRelotiveChronologicol Posilion of EgypliunPredynustic ondEorly Dynoslic Tombswilh 0biecls lmpofied from the NeorEustond the Nufure of Inferregionol Conlocls STANHENDRICKX AND LAURENTBAVAY lnfroduction their chronological position compared with the chronolog- ical sequence of the Naqada culture cannot be established Foreign objects found in Egyptian Predynastic and Early with enough precision. Dynastic tombs received much attention in the past, and For the excavations carried out at the end of the have frequently been discussed during recent years (see, nineteenth century or during the first decades of the among others, Adams and Friedman 1992; Andelkovic twentieth, the identification of imports is in many cases 1995; Braun and van den Brink 1998; Hartung 1994; very difficult, because the objects themselves can often no Hennessy 1967; I(antor 1992; I(roeper 1989; Tutundzic longer be located. It is also probable that a number of 1993). The discovery of a large quantity of Canaanite imported artifacts or materials were not recognized as such pottery at cemetery U in Abydos (Hartung 1993,1996; see at the time. The problem is even more important because however Porat and Goren, this volume) in tombs dating the cemeteries excavated in those days represent the large to the late Naqada II and early Naqada III period, i.e. majority of published Predynastic and Early Dynastic before the beginning of the First Dynasty, is of particular tombs, and will certainly continue to do so for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Tell El-Ghaba Ii
    Colección Estudios, 5 TELL EL-GHABA II A Saite Settlement in North Sinai, Egypt (Argentine Archaeological Mission, 1995-2004) Edited by Perla Fuscaldo Editorial Assistance: Silvia Lupo Introduction Studies Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas Departamento de Egiptología Saavedra 15, 5º, Buenos Aires (C1083), Argentina 2006 1 Tell el-Ghaba II Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas (IMHICIHU) Director: Dr. Ariel Guiance Vice-Director: Dr. Luis Borrero Address: Saavedra 15, 5th floor (C1083 ACA) Buenos Aires, Argentina Phone/fax: (00-54-11) 4953-8548, 2042 e-mail: [email protected] Departamento de Egiptología (DEGIP) Chairman: Dr. Alicia Daneri de Rodrigo e-mail: [email protected] Colección Estudios: Publication of projects developed at the DEGIP Project No. I: "Sinai" Director: Dr. Perla Fuscaldo (1994-2004) e-mail:[email protected] Grants for publication 1.- CONICET, PIP 2005-2006, No. 5874. “Tell el-Ghaba. Un sitio saíta en el norte de Sinaí, Egipto”. 2.- CONICET, IMHICIHU. CONICET Tell el-Ghaba II : A saite settlement in north Sinai, Egypt (Argentine Archaeological Mission, 1995-2004). Introduction. Studies. / ; con colaboración de María Beatriz Cremonte ... [et.al.]. - 1a ed. - Buenos Aires : Consejo Nacional Investigaciones Científicas Técnicas - CONICET. Instituto Multidisciplinario de Historia y Ciencias Humanas - IMHICIHU. , 2011. Internet. - (Tell el-Ghaba) ISBN 978-950-692-097-5 1. Arqueología. I. Cremonte, María Beatriz, colab. II. Título. CDD 930.1 2 Tell el-Ghaba II Contents Introduction by Perla Fuscaldo Studies The Site Jorge Trench, The Geophysical Survey of the Site.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement – December 2017 – Survey of the Literature on Recent
    A Malacological Journal ISSN 1565-1916 No. 36 - SUPPLEMENT DECEMBER 2017 2 SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE ON RECENT SHELLS FROM THE RED SEA (third enlarged and revised edition) L.J. van Gemert* Summary This literature survey lists approximately 3,050 references. Shells are being considered here as the shell bearing molluscs of the Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Scaphopoda. The area does not only comprise the Red Sea, but also the Gulf of Aden, Somalia and the Suez Canal, including the Lessepsian species in the Mediterranean Sea. Literature on fossils shells, particularly those from the Holocene, Pleistocene and Pliocene, is listed too. Introduction My interest in recent shells from the Red Sea dates from about 1996. Since then, I have been, now and then, trying to obtain information on this subject. Some years ago I decide to stop gathering data in a haphazard way and to do it more properly. This resulted in a first survey of approximately 1,420 and a second one of 2,025 references (van Gemert, 2010 & 2011). Since then, this survey has again been enlarged and revised and a number of errors have been corrected. It contains now approximately 3,050 references. Scope In principle every publication in which molluscs are reported to live or have lived in the Red Sea should be listed in the survey. This means that besides primary literature, i.e. articles in which researchers are reporting their finds for the first time, secondary and tertiary literature, i.e. reviews, monographs, books, etc are to be included too. These publications were written not only by a wide range of authors ranging from amateur shell collectors to professional malacologists but also people interested in the field of archaeology, geology, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • TELL EL-GINN Project (Eastern Delta) (Egypt 2004)
    [email protected] www.grepal.org TELL EL-GINN Project (Eastern Delta) (Egypt 2004) July 2003 TELL EL-GINN Project (Eastern Delta) (Egypt 2004) Luc Watrin July 2003 TELL EL-GINN Tell el-Ginn, meaning “Djinn’s Hill”, is located in Lower-Egypt in the north-eastern Delta around 150 km from Cairo1. In the 4th millennium this site was situated along a tributary of the Nile and on the banks of the Mediterranean Sea (the present-day coastline is 50 km to the north). It was professor Lech Krzyzaniak, director of the Polish School of Egyptian Prehistory, who brought the site to our attention during the Poznan Symposium on Prehistory (Poland, 2000). Professor Krzyzaniak suggested that Tell el-Ginn was very promising2, having visited the site in 1981 while excavating the neighbouring site of Tell es-Sabaa Banât. Tell el-Ginn is indeed located around two kilometers to the north-east of Tell es-Sabaa Banât (close to the Minshat Abou Omar village), and risks being destroyed due to the extension of dwellings and agriculture in this area3. Fig. 1. Localization of Tell el-Ginn site (Eastern Delta). Tell el-Ginn 1 I thank all those who collaborated on this article (Nick Collins, Gransard-Desmond J.-O, Vaudou E, Eulert P. H. Brihaye P. and Blin O., Ould Makhlouf N.). 2 L. Krzyzaniak, pers. com , Poznan, 2000. Two members of the GREPAL (N. Collins and L. Watrin) participated in the Poznan Symposium in Poland in August 2001. 3 During our survey in the region in 2001 we saw tractors trying to flatten the hillocks of Tell el-Sabaa Banât in order to have additional fields for crops.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Pyramids Oi.Ucicago.Edu
    oi.ucicago.edu Before the pyramids oi.ucicago.edu before the pyramids baked clay, squat, round-bottomed, ledge rim jar. 12.3 x 14.9 cm. Naqada iiC. oim e26239 (photo by anna ressman) 2 oi.ucicago.edu Before the pyramids the origins of egyptian civilization edited by emily teeter oriental institute museum puBlications 33 the oriental institute of the university of chicago oi.ucicago.edu Library of Congress Control Number: 2011922920 ISBN-10: 1-885923-82-1 ISBN-13: 978-1-885923-82-0 © 2011 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Published 2011. Printed in the United States of America. The Oriental Institute, Chicago This volume has been published in conjunction with the exhibition Before the Pyramids: The Origins of Egyptian Civilization March 28–December 31, 2011 Oriental Institute Museum Publications 33 Series Editors Leslie Schramer and Thomas G. Urban Rebecca Cain and Michael Lavoie assisted in the production of this volume. Published by The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago 1155 East 58th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 USA oi.uchicago.edu For Tom and Linda Illustration Credits Front cover illustration: Painted vessel (Catalog No. 2). Cover design by Brian Zimerle Catalog Nos. 1–79, 82–129: Photos by Anna Ressman Catalog Nos. 80–81: Courtesy of the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford Printed by M&G Graphics, Chicago, Illinois. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Service — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984 ∞ oi.ucicago.edu book title TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. Gil J.
    [Show full text]