DOCSLIB.ORG

ED131 Land East of Buckingham Road

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ED131 Land East of Buckingham Road Mr Nick Freer Our Ref: APP/J0405/A/14/2219574 David Lock Associates Ltd 50 North Thirteenth Street Central Milton Keynes MK9 3BP 9 August 2016 Dear Sir TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY HALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT LTD: LAND EAST OF A413 BUCKINGHAM ROAD AND WATERMEAD, AYLESBURY APPLICATION REF: 13/03534/AOP 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, David M H Rose BA (Hons) MRTPI, who held an inquiry for 13 days between 4 November 2014 and 21 July 2015 into your client’s appeal against a refusal to grant outline planning permission by Aylesbury Vale District Council (‘the Council’) for up to 1,560 dwellings, together with a primary school, nursery, a mixed use local centre for retail, employment, healthcare and community uses, green infrastructure and new link road, in accordance with application reference 13/03534/AOP, dated 17 December 2013. 2. On 6 June 2014 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, because the appeal involves proposals for residential development of over 150 units or on sites of over 5 hectares, which would significantly impact on the Government’s objective to secure a better balance between housing demand and supply and create high quality, sustainable, mixed and inclusive communities. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector recommends that the appeal be dismissed. For the reasons given below, the Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector’s conclusions and recommendation, dismisses the appeal and refuses planning permission. A copy of the Inspector’s report (IR) is enclosed. All references to paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, are to that report. Matters arising following the close of the Inquiry 4. The Secretary of State notes the procedural matters at 1.1 to 1.6 of the IR. Phil Barber, Decision Officer Tel 0303 444 4 2853 Planning Casework [email protected] 3rd Floor Fry Building 2 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DF 5. On 10 May 2016, the Secretary of State wrote to parties to seek comments on the Judgment in the cases of Suffolk District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP v Cheshire East Borough Council & Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2016] EWCA Civ 168. 6. In reaching his decision on this appeal, the Secretary of State has taken account of all correspondence on the above matters. As this correspondence was copied to the parties to this case the Secretary of State does not consider it necessary to reproduce it here. Copies may be obtained on request to the address at the foot of the first page of this letter. Policy considerations 7. In deciding this appeal, the Secretary of State has had regard to section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (“the Act”), which requires that proposals be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this case the development plan consists of the saved policies of the Aylesbury Vale District Local Plan (LP), adopted January 2004. Other material considerations which the Secretary of State has taken into account include the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework), the associated planning practice guidance (the Guidance) and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010 as amended. Emerging Policy 8. The Secretary of State notes that public consultation on the new Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan began on 7 July 2016. He notes the proposed housing allocations are subject to change and at this stage land east of the A413 at Buckingham Road and Watermead does not appear as a proposal. He gives the emerging policy no weight at this stage. Main considerations 9. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the main considerations are those listed at IR1.35. Housing land supply 10. Having carefully considered the Inspector’s discussion at IR7.2-7.9 with regard to the housing requirement and land supply the Secretary of State agrees that a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites cannot be demonstrated against objectively assessed need. He notes the Council are still working on their assessment and published a position paper in January 2016. However these figures have not been tested against objectively assessed need and he gives them no weight at this stage. At the Inquiry a supply of around 3 years was agreed between parties. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector the provision of both market and affordable housing at the level required by Policy GP.2 is a factor of very significant weight (IR7.10). Landscape Landscape character 11. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the development would impact on two local landscape character areas (IR7.13), remove key landscape characteristics 2 including narrow strip fields and ridge and furrow, and compound the impact of ribbon development along the A418 (IR7.19). He further agrees that, with the exception of narrow remnant gaps, the built up area of Aylesbury would run out into Bierton. The Secretary of State also agrees with the Inspector and finds that the screening planting would be at odds with the open character of the landscape and would compound the influence of the urban area onto the neighbouring landscape character areas (IR7.25). Visual effects 12. The Secretary of State notes the Inspector’s discussion at IR7.26 – 7.35 and agrees that the visual impacts from public rights of way, especially those in more sensitive countryside would be very marked, the approach to Aylesbury along the A413 would become more urban and from the A418 there would be blurring of the distinction between Aylesbury and Bierton (IR7.36). Landscape value 13. The Secretary of State notes the proposed development is not within a designated landscape and its scenic quality is not of any note (IR7.37 – 7.38). He agrees that formal public access and recreational use is limited to two public rights of way across the site (IR7.41) and agrees with the Inspector that the land has minimal recreational value. Scheme design 14. The Secretary of State notes the development would deliver green infrastructure and a linear park (IR7.43). However, like the Inspector he concludes that the proposals would result in a fundamental and adverse change to the character of the landscape, and that the visual impacts of the proposal would be especially marked by extending the influence of Aylesbury into the open countryside and onto land which currently provides containment to the built up area, in conflict with the Framework and Policy GP.35 (design of new development). As such he finds like the Inspector that notwithstanding the ecological and recreational benefits of the proposal, the development as a whole would have a very significant adverse impact on the character and appearance of the landscape (IR7.46). The setting, identity and historic context of adjacent settlements Setting and identity 15. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that Bierton is a village surrounded by countryside and not joined to Aylesbury and that the proposed development would cause Bierton to lose its separate identify (IR7.51). He further agrees that the proposed green infrastructure would effectively tie Watermead to Bierton and is likely to be perceived as a complementary element of the new housing development and as such be a further agent of coalescence (IR7.55). 16. The Secretary of State has carefully considered the Inspector’s comments at IR7.57 – 7.60 and agrees that omission of some housing from the proposal would offset the identified adverse impact on the individuality of Bierton, but that it would not eliminate it (IR7.61). 3 Historic context 17. The Secretary of State like the Inspector finds that the development would not have any material effect on the setting of Bierton’s historic assets and that the character and appearance of the Conservation Area would be preserved (IR7.62). He further agrees that the ability to read or appreciate the history of the landscape as a whole would be seriously diminished by built development, through the loss of a generally well-preserved field pattern (IR7.66). Planning Policy 18. The Secretary of State has noted the Inspector’s comments at IR7.68 – 7.69 and his summary conclusions at IR7.70 – 7.73. He disagrees with the Inspector and finds Policy RA.2 now a relevant policy for the supply of housing as it is engaged when there is any reduction to open land that contributes to the form and character of rural settlements. Because policy RA.2 is a relevant policy for the supply of housing Paragraph 49 of the Framework applies, however policy RA.2 should not be considered up-to-date because of a lack of a 5 year housing land supply. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the specific purpose of Policy RA.2 is to avoid coalescence and protect the identity of settlements; he therefore gives some weight to Policy RA.2 in the planning balance. Best and most versatile agricultural land 19. The Secretary of State agrees with the Inspector that the development would involve the loss of 55 hectares of best and most versatile agricultural land including 19.5 hectares of grade 2 land (IR7.80). He also agrees that this loss is of material significance undermining the sustainability claims of the scheme and like the Inspector gives this matter moderate weight. Mix of uses and sustainability 20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quarrendon – Aylesbury 4/4A
    Berryfields – Quarrendon – Aylesbury 4/4A Monday to Friday From: 12th April 2021 Service number: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Notes: SMH sch Nsch schX Aylesbury, Bus Station, Bay G1 I I 0628 0650 0705 0720 0735 0750 0750 0755 0810 0825 0840 0855 0910 Aylesbury, High Street, Stop H1 I I 0630 0652 0707 0722 0737 0752 0752 0757 0812 0827 0842 0857 0912 Meadowcroft, John Kennedy I I 0637 0659 0714 0729 0745 I 0800 0806 0819 0834 0849 0904 0919 Jackson Road, Surgery I I 0640 0702 0717 0732 0748 I 0803 0810 0822 0837 0852 0907 0922 Berryfields, Bramley Road I 0623 0645 0707 0722 0737 0753 0811 0808 I 0827 0842 0857 0912 0927 Aylesbury Vale Academy I 0626 0648 0710 0725 0740 0756 0814 0811 0822 0830 0845 0900 0915 0930 Aylesbury Vale Parkway Station I 0630 0652 0713 0728 0743 0759 0817 0814 I 0833 0848 I I I Haydon Hill, Meredith Drive 0625 0635 0657 I I I I I I I I I I I Jackson Road, Surgery 0628 0638 0700 0718 0732 0747 0803 0821 0818 0832 0837 0852 0905 0920 0935 Meadowcroft, John Kennedy 0631 0641 0703 0721 0735 0750 0806 0824 0821 0835 0841 0855 0908 0923 0938 Aylesbury, Bus Station 0639 0649 0711 0729 0744 0759 0815 0833 0830 0844 0850 0904 0917 0932 0947 Service number: 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4A 4A 4A 4A 4A Notes: schX schD Aylesbury, Bus Station, Bay G1 0925 0940 0955 10 25 40 55 1425 1440 1500 I I 1515 Aylesbury, High Street, Stop H1 0927 0942 0957 and 12 27 42 57 1427 1442 1502 I I 1517 Meadowcroft, John Kennedy 0934 0949 1004 then 19 34 49 04 1434 1449 1509 I I 1524 Jackson Road, Surgery 0937 0952 1007 at 22 37 52 07 1437 1452 1512 I I
    [Show full text]
  • Ridge View, 1 Fleet Marston Cottages, Fleet Marston, Buckinghamshire, HP18 0PZ
    Ridge View, 1 Fleet Marston Cottages, Fleet Marston, Buckinghamshire, HP18 0PZ Aylesbury 1.5 miles (Marylebone 55 mins.), Thame 10 miles, Milton Keynes 18 miles (Distances approx.) RIDGE VIEW, 1 FLEET MARSTON COTTAGES, FLEET MARSTON, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE HP18 0PZ A REFURBISHED COTTAGE EXTENDED OVER TIME TO NOW PROVIDE SIZEABLE ACCOMMODATION IN A QUARTER OF AN ACRE PLOT. RURAL LOCATION WITH FAR REACHING VIEWS JUST TWO MILES FROM AYLESBURY AND FIVE MINUTES FROM AYLESBURY VALE PARKWAY STATION. WADDESDON SCHOOL CATCHMENT Entrance Hall, Large Open Plan Sitting Room, Wonderful Garden Room, Kitchen/Dining Room, Cloakroom, Utility Room, Master Bedroom with Dressing Area and Bathroom, Three Further Double Bedrooms, Family Bathroom, Driveway Parking, Garage, Large Garden Backing onto Countryside Guide Price £485,000 Freehold LOCATION DESCRIPTION Marston comes from the words ‘Mersc and Tun’ meaning Marsh Ridge View is situated in a rural location with open countryside to the Farm. The epithet Fleet refers to a ‘Fleet’ of Brackish water. rear and superb views. The property dates from the late 1900’s and Fleet Marston is a small hamlet of houses either side of the A41 near has been greatly extended over the years, the most recent addition an Aylesbury with an early fourteenth century church. Although excellent garden room which really opens up the ground floor. The slightly larger now ‘Magna Britannia’ from 1806 states only 22 accommodation is very well presented, the current owners having inhabitants living in four houses. Waddesdon (2 ½ miles) has a shop undertaken refurbishment throughout. In the entrance hall are for day to day needs or alternatively Aylesbury is also 2 miles, with floorboards and the staircase, off to the side a cloakroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Walk-Thame-U3A-Draft 4
    Historic Walk – Thame & District U3A This rural walk along the River Thame passes through a number of villages of historical interest and visits the 15th century architectural gems of Rycote Chapel and Waterstock Mill. Starting at the church at Shabbington in Buckinghamshire the route soon crosses the River Thame into Oxfordshire and follows the river, before crossing the old railway line to reach Rycote Chapel. From Rycote the route follows an undulating track to Albury and then on to Tiddington. Heading south in Tiddington the route circles west to cross the railway line again before arriving at Waterstock via the golf course. Here there is an opportunity to visit the old mill before returning via the 17th century bridge at Ickford and back into Buckinghamshire. The small hamlet of Little Ickford is the last port of call before returning across the fields to Shabbington. In winter the conditions underfoot can be muddy and in times of flood parts of the route are impassable. Walk Length The main walk (Walk A) is just over 8.5 miles (13.8 km) long (inclusive of two detours to Rycote Chapel and Waterstock Mill) and is reasonably flat. At a medium walking pace this should take 3.5 to 4 hours but time needs to be added on to appreciate the points of interest along the way. Walk B is 5.8 miles (9.4 km) a shorter version of Walk A, missing out some of Tiddington and Waterstock. Walk C is another shorter variation of 4.7 miles (7.5 km), taking in Ickford Bridge, Albury and Waterstock but missing out Rycote Chapel and Shabbington.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarrendon Fields Aylesbury Buckinghamshire
    QUARRENDON FIELDS AYLESBURY BUCKINGHAMSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FIELD EVALUATION Document: 2009/103 Project: BA1519 15th January 2010 Compiled by Checked by Approved by James Newboult Joe Abrams Drew Shotliff Produced for: Hives Planning On behalf of: Arnold White Estates Ltd © Copyright Albion Archaeology 2010, all rights reserved Albion Archaeology Contents Key Terms...........................................................................................................................................4 Preface.................................................................................................................................................5 Structure of this Report.....................................................................................................................5 Non-Technical Summary...................................................................................................................6 1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................... 7 1.1 Project background .............................................................................................................7 1.2 Location and Archaeological Background.........................................................................8 2. METHODOLOGY..................................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................9 2.2 Cropmark Analysis..............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • 1 [Saxonbucks4: 15.11.2006 Version] Apart from the Introductory Section
    [saxonbucks4: 15.11.2006 version] Apart from the introductory section, this paper follows the sequence of headings proposed in the Notes for Contributors to the regional research framework. Each section commences with a list in italic of the suggested sub-themes. Solent Thames Research Framework. Saxon Buckinghamshire Michael Farley 1. Introduction Nature of the evidence: history of research: role of material culture This survey covers most of historic Buckinghamshire, which is now served by the Sites and Monuments Record of the County Council and Milton Keynes Council. It does not cover a few, largely Thameside, parishes formerly within the county but now within Slough Borough Council and the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead. The County Museum service covers the whole of the modern administrative area of Buckinghamshire. Buckinghamshire, probably a creation of the tenth century, has always been more of an administrative convenience than a natural entity. Buckingham, the original county town, lost its position to Aylesbury fairly early in the medieval period, the latter gaining its position largely due to its useful county-centred location rather than to any particular commercial advantage. Although Buckinghamshire has been fortunate in having one of the earliest county archaeological societies (founded in 1847) also early Victoria County History volumes, which included a review of Saxon remains by Reginald Smith (1905) and early Royal Commission inventory volumes (1912 and 1913), it has only produced a handful of antiquaries such as Browne Willis (1755) and Langley (1797) with any strong interest in its physical remains. Nor did the county produce an early group of excavators.
    [Show full text]
  • Peasants, Peers and Graziers: the Landscape of Quarrendon In
    PEASANTS, PEERS AND GRAZIERS: THE LANDSCAPE OF QUARRENDON, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, INTERPRETED PAUL EVERSON The medieval and later earthworks at Quarrendon, surveyed by staff of the former Royal Commission on the Historical Monuments of England (now English Heritage), are described and interpreted. They reveal a sequence of major land-use phases that can be related coherently to topographical, documentary and architectural evidence. The earliest element may be the site of St Peter's church, located alongside a causeway. The evidence for its architectural development and decline is assem- bled. The site of a set of almshouses in the churchyard is identified. In the later medieval period, there were two separate foci of settlement, each similarly comprising a loose grouping of farmsteads around a green. It is argued that these form components of a form of dispersed settlement pattern in the parish and wider locality. Following conversion for sheep, depopulation and engrossment by the Lee family, merchant graziers of Warwick, a 16th-century moated country mansion was created, with accompanying formal gardens, warren and park. This was one of a group of residences in Buckinghamshire and north Oxfordshire of Sir Henry Lee, creator of the Accession Day tournaments for Elizabeth I and queen's champion. A tenanted farm, its farmhouse probably reusing a retained fragment of the earlier great house, replaced this house. The sites of agricultural cottages and oxpens of an early modern regime of grazing and cattle fattening are identified. In discussion, access and water supply to the great house, and the symbolism of the formal gardens, almshouses and warren are explored.
    [Show full text]
  • District of Aylesbury Vale
    Appendix A DISTRICT OF AYLESBURY VALE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, 1983 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT, 1972 AYLESBURY PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY SCHEDULE OF POLLING DISTRICTS AND POLLING PLACES The Aylesbury Vale District Council has designated the following Polling Districts and Polling Places for the Aylesbury Parliamentary Constituency. These Polling Districts and Polling Places will come into effect following the making of The Aylesbury Vale (Electoral Changes) Order 2014. The Polling District is also the Polling Place except where indicated. The same Polling Districts and Polling Places will also apply for local elections. Whilst indicative Polling Stations are shown it is for the Returning Officer for the particular election to determine the location of the Polling Station. Where a boundary is described or shown on a map as running along a road, railway line, footway, watercourse or similar geographical feature, it shall be treated as running along the centre line of the feature. Polling District/Description of Polling Polling Place Indicative Polling District Station Aylesbury Baptist Church, Bedgrove No. 1 Limes Avenue That part of the Bedgrove Ward of Aylesbury Town to the north of a line commencing at Tring Road running south-westwards from 2 Bedgrove to the rear of properties in Bedgrove and Camborne Avenue (but reverting to the road where there is no frontage residential property) to Turnfurlong Lane, thence north-westwards along Turnfurlong Lane to the north-western boundary of No. 1A, thence north-eastwards along the rear boundary of 1 – 14 Windsor Road and 2 – 4 Hazell Avenue to St Josephs RC First School, thence following the south- eastern and north-eastern perimeter of the school site to join and follow the rear boundary of properties in King Edward Avenue, thence around the south-eastern side of 118 Tring Road to the Ward boundary at Tring Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Estate Staff
    Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies Estate Staff General advice Records relating to domestic staff for Buckinghamshire estates are disappointingly scant at the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies. It is not entirely clear why this is the case. It may be that records like registers of employees were never drawn up. It could also be because estates were simply more assiduous about keeping records like title deeds that they valued more highly. As a result, many of our estate collections contain large quantities of deeds at the expense of other types of documents, but that doesn’t mean that no information can be found. This booklet aims to cover those records which do survive and have a specific staffing dimension. However, they are not the only items which might be helpful. Correspondence, bills, accounts etc. are all possibilities and may mention staff in some context. They are rarely comprehensively indexed in archival catalogues and will therefore require more thorough research. This extra work can be extremely rewarding. The household correspondence for the Mentmore Estate (reference D- RO/2/73) is a good example. It includes extensive correspondence from Alice Slater, a cook for Lord Rosebery, refuting allegations of wastefulness. If we hold nothing useful, it is sometimes worth contacting the relevant estate if it survives. Some estates (like the Verneys at Claydon) maintain their own archives. Contact details can be Taplow Court, home of the Grenfell family (reference phTaplow 66) found through ARCHON (www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archon). Bear in mind that private families have no obligation to allow you to inspect their records, they may refuse access or charge you a fee to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Find Enclosed a Summary Leaflet for The
    Community Chest a partnership initiative Year Seven Report 2013 – 2014 Community Chest Annual Report 2013-14 More than 2,000 volunteers supported the 85 projects which were funded by the Community Chest in 2013-14 Front Cover: (clockwise) BBOWT Bernwood Forest, Padbury Sports Development, Aston Clinton Community Group, Aylesbury Coffee Morning Club (deaf adults group) at the Healthy Living Centre, Walton Court, Carers Bucks Young Carers Activity Programme, Wendover Scouts. Photographs in this report are either provided by the projects themselves, taken by Grants Panel members or by MJD Photography unless otherwise acknowledged. www.mjdphoto.biz Above left: Working Together, 4th June 2014 – group photo of Community Chest Grant Recipients, Buckinghamshire Railway Centre, Quainton www.mjdphoto.biz th right: Sustainability Workshop, 7 February 2014, taken by Luke Clark 2 Community Chest Annual Report, 2013-14 Contents Chairman’s Report 4 What is the Community Chest? 4 2013-14 milestones 4 Grants panel membership 5 Project Grants 5 Microgrants 5 3YR grants (2011-14) 6 AVYFC Youth Cafés 6 Aylesbury Homeless Action Group 6 Buckingham CAB 7 Chilterns MS Centre 7 Community Impact Bucks 8 Healthy Living Centre CIC 8 Horses Helping People CIC 9 Puzzle Centre 9 Young Carers Bucks 10 Working Together 2014 11 Map 13 Facts, figures and feedback 14 List of grants awarded in year 7 16 3 Community Chest Annual Report 2013-14 Report from the Grants Panel Chairman It has been an honour to be chairman of the grants panel for the past year. I have learned such a lot from the different organisations that come to us for funding, and I have enjoyed my time on the panel since 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckinghamshire
    Buckinghamshire Later Bronze Age and Iron Age Historic Environment Resource Assessment Sandy Kidd June 2007 Nature of the evidence The Sites and Monuments Records for Buckinghamshire and Milton Keynes attributes 1622 records (monuments and find spots) to the Iron Age and a further 144 records to the Middle or Late Bronze Age representing about 9.4% of total SMR records. Also, many formally undated cropmark sites probably actually date to the Bronze Age or Iron Age. In addition evidence for the survival of putatively prehistoric landscapes into modern times needs to be considered (see landscape section). Later prehistoric sites have been recognised in Buckinghamshire since the 19 th century with useful summaries of the state of knowledge at the beginning of the twentieth century being provided by the Royal Commission for Historical Monuments and Victoria County History. Essentially knowledge was restricted to a few prominent earthwork monuments and a handful of distinctive finds, mostly from the Chilterns and Thames (Clinch, 1905; RCHME, 1912 & 1913). By 1955 Jack Head was able to identify a concentration of Iron Age hillforts, settlement sites and finds along the Chiltern scarp along with a few sites (mainly hillforts) on the dipslope and a scattering of sites along the Thames. A few of these sites, notably Bulstrode and Cholesbury Camps and an apparently open settlement on Lodge Hill, Saunderton had been investigated by trial trenching (Head, 1955, 62-78). By 1979 it was possible to draw upon a wider range of evidence including modern excavations, aerial photography and environmental archaeology referring to sites in the Ouse valley as well as the Chilterns, open settlements as well as hillforts and evidence for extensive open grassland environments from the Bronze Age onwards (Reed, 1979, 35-41).
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Berryfields News
    BERRYFIELDS NEWS THE BERRYFIELDS PARISH COUNCIL MAGAZINE BERRYFIELDS AUTUMN EDITION 2017 NEWS THE BERRYFIELDS PARISH COUNCIL MAGAZINE AUTUMN EDITION 2017 Welcome to our Autumn newsletter. The summer holidays have been and gone, the children have now returned to school and the weather! Well, probably best we don’t mention that. Welcome to our Autumn newsletter. The summer holidays have been and gone, the children have now returned to school and the weather! Well, probablyFirstly, bestI would we don’t like tomention mention that. the issue of the parking, and, in particular, the painted lines around the AVA which were promised to be in place Firstly,before I would the start like toof mentionthe new the term. issue There of the have parking been, and a ,number in particular of angry, theposts painted on Facebooklines around against the AVA our which County were Councillor, promised to Paul be in Irwin place in relation to beforethe fact the thestart li ofnes the were new notterm. forthcoming. There have beenThese a number‘rants’ areof angry unnecessary , and unfoundedposts, despite on Facebook the fact against the promise our County was Councillor,not kept. ThePaul mainIrwin inreason relation for to this was that this projectthe required fact the li anes number were not of forthcoming.legal processes These to ‘rants’ be in placeare unnecessary which unfortunately,, andtook unfounded longer than, despite expe thected fact to thefinalise. promise was not kept. The main reason for this was that this project required a number of legal processes to be in place which unfortunately, took longer than expected to finalise.
    [Show full text]