DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 Document Organization .............................................................................................. 1 Project Process .......................................................................................................... 3 Stakeholder Coordination ............................................................................................... 4 Vision, Goals, and Objectives .......................................................................................... 5 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................ 7 System Overview ....................................................................................................... 7 City of Tallahassee ..................................................................................................... 9 ITS Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 9 Communications ..................................................................................................... 9 Traffic Management Center .................................................................................... 16 Traffic Signals........................................................................................................ 17 Bicycle Technology................................................................................................ 18 Transit .................................................................................................................... 19 Florida State University ............................................................................................. 19 FSU Parking Technology ........................................................................................ 21 FSU Transit Technology ......................................................................................... 21 FSU Bicycle Technology ......................................................................................... 21 Needs Assessment ....................................................................................................... 22 Safety and Mobility Needs ......................................................................................... 22 Congestion Data ................................................................................................... 22 Safety Data .......................................................................................................... 28 Priority Corridors .................................................................................................. 29 Additional ITS Needs ................................................................................................ 29 Emerging Technology Considerations ......................................................................... 30 Communications for Autonomous and Connected Vehicles ......................................... 30 Network Architecture Enhancement ......................................................................... 31 Recommendations ....................................................................................................... 32 i Project Identification ............................................................................................. 32 Traffic Management .................................................................................................. 33 Adaptive Traffic Signal Control ................................................................................ 33 System Detectors ...................................................................................................35 CCTV Cameras ...................................................................................................... 36 Smart Work Zones................................................................................................. 40 Flashing Yellow Arrows .......................................................................................... 41 Travel Time Reliability System Expansion ................................................................. 42 Cabinet Upgrades.................................................................................................. 45 Managed Field Ethernet Switch Replacement ........................................................... 45 Connected Vehicle Infrastructure ............................................................................ 46 ATMS Upgrades .................................................................................................... 47 Transit Management ................................................................................................. 47 Transit Signal Priority ............................................................................................ 48 Traveler Information ................................................................................................. 49 Website Connectivity ............................................................................................. 49 I-10 Trailblazers .................................................................................................... 50 Performance Measures...............................................................................................51 Bicycle Detection ......................................................................................................53 Transportation Management Center ........................................................................... 55 Communications ...................................................................................................... 56 Bandwidth Demand ............................................................................................... 56 Communications Network – Redundancy Expansion.................................................... 57 Budgetary Estimates .................................................................................................... 61 Implementation Plan.................................................................................................... 63 Prioritization Criteria ................................................................................................ 63 Project Ranking........................................................................................................ 68 High Level Deployment Plan ...................................................................................... 69 Staffing Plan ............................................................................................................ 70 Conclusion................................................................................................................... 73 ii List of Tables Table 1: Stakeholder List ................................................................................................ 4 Table 2: Master Plan Goals and Objectives ........................................................................ 5 Table 3: City of Tallahassee ITS Devices ............................................................................ 9 Table 4: Top Bottleneck Locations ................................................................................. 23 Table 5: Crash Type by Location .................................................................................... 28 Table 6: Average Bicyclists per Hour – 2014 to 2018 ......................................................... 54 Table 7: Preliminary Bandwidth Analysis .......................................................................... 57 Table 8: Estimated Project Costs ................................................................................... 61 Table 9: Safety Criteria................................................................................................. 64 Table 10: Mobility Criteria............................................................................................. 65 Table 11: Accountability Criteria .................................................................................... 66 Table 12: Prioritization Rubric ....................................................................................... 67 Table 13: Secondary Prioritization Rubric – Geographic Projects ........................................ 67 Table 14: Project Ranking ............................................................................................. 68 Table 15: Project Deployment Timeframes ...................................................................... 69 Table 16: Proposed City Staffing Levels ........................................................................... 71 List of Figures Figure 1: Tallahassee ITS Master Plan Process ................................................................... 3 Figure 2: City of Tallahassee Location Map........................................................................ 8 Figure 3: BlueTOAD Device Locations .............................................................................. 11 Figure 4: CCTV Camera Locations .................................................................................. 12 Figure 5: Signalized Intersections – Citywide .................................................................... 13 Figure 6: Signalized Intersections – Downtown ................................................................ 14 Figure 7: Existing Fiber Network
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rest Area Map 2017.Ai
    250 000 mE 300 000 mE 350 000 mE 400 000 mE 450 000 mE 500 000 mE 550 000 mE 600 000 mE 650 000 mE 700 000 mE 750 000 mE 120° 119º 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° OREGON IDAHO TO TWIN FALLS TO FIELDS TO JORDAN VALLEY TO MOUNTAIN HOME 42° LAKE TO ADEL TWIN FALLS CASSIA 42° HARNEY MALHEUR OWYHEE 4 650 000 mN Jackpot 4 650 000 mN Denio 292 140 McDermitt Owyhee Denio Jct 93 Salmon Falls 95 225 Mountain City Creek Contact Thousand 140 Springs Leonard Creek 293 MODOC Orovada 4 600 000 mN Orovada 4 600 000 mN Paradise Valley Jack Creek North Fork Wilkins ELDER BOX (site) 226 TO PARK VALLEY 140 290 Montello ION HUMBOLDT UN PACIFIC TO CEDARVILLE Pequop 233 Button ELKO Dinner Station 4 550 000 mN Deeth Wells 4 550 000 mN 231 95 Point 41° 230 41° Oasis 225 ALT Winnemucca 93 789 UNION UNION Jungo Halleck (site) Leeville PACIFIC Golconda 229 UNIO UNION (site) 294 N PACIFIC 80 80 Tungsten PACIFIC Elko Arthur WASHOE (site) Valmy 766 TO SALT LAKE CITY PACIFIC Spring 95 Valmy Creek Wendover West Beowawe Wendover 80 227 Lamoille Cosgrave 806 Gerlach Rye Patch Imlay Carlin Reservoir (Welcome Mill City 228 229 4 500 000 mN 4 500 000 mN Battle Mountain Empire 767 Station) PACIFIC 400 ALT (site) Copper Beowawe 93 Canyon PERSHING (site) 305 NORTHERN ON I 447 Unionville 306 UN 401 93 TOOELE Crescent 278 Jiggs Valley LASSEN Oreana Tenabo DISTRICT (site) DISTRICT NEVADA TO IBAPAH Currie U P Rochester Valley of 399 398 (site) Gold Acres (site) 4 450 000 mN 2 the Moon 3 4 450 000 mN Lovelock Garden Pyramid 397 Valley Lages Station 40 Lake 40° 445 NORTHERN Sutcliffe Cherry
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana Emergency Evacuation
    49E LMOiller ULafayette ISIColuAmbia NA EUnion MERGAshley ENChiCcot YWashington EVACUATION WMinston AP Holmes Attala Noxubee 371 Humphreys Cass 71 79 51 425 165 65 2 Morehouse Sharkey Yazoo Neshoba Kemper 3 Claiborne West Carroll Leake 2 Issaquena 55 167 Union 2 2 79 East Carroll Bossier 63 1 133 49 Madison Lincoln Monroe 17 65 Caddo 80 61 20 Harrison 220 Webster 80 167 Meridian Ouachita 80 Lauderdale Shreveport Jackson Newton 20 371 80 Scott 20 165 Richland 79 6 220 147 Madison Warren Jackson 20 80 Bienville 2 1 Hinds Rankin 71 17 Vicksburg 167 34 65 Panola 171 Franklin Caldwell Clarke Jasper 84 Red River Smith De Soto 165 Tensas 15 Claiborne 84 45 Winn Simpson 49 171 11 84 Copiah 49 1 84 Shelby Jefferson 55 84 Natchitoches Catahoula 65 Wayne 167 84 Covington Jones 6 71 La Salle 51 Lawrence 165 84 65 Natchez Jefferson Davis Sabine Lincoln 84 1 84 Concordia Adams 6 Franklin 28 59 Grant 61 San Augustine Mississippi Sabine Hattiesburg 171 Alexandria Greene Marion Lamar Forrest Perry 28 5 Pike 98 Wilkinson Amite Walthall Rapides Vernon 3 98 55 8 Avoyelles Texas 7 1 61 West Feliciana George East Feliciana 59 167 4 43 Washington 21 67 St. Helena Stone 71 25 19 Pearl River Newton 8 449 51 190 Evangeline 49 Pointe Coupee Jasper 27 165 49 East Baton Rouge 16 Tangipahoa 11 26 61 171 113 167 Tyler Beauregard Allen 13 16 Jackson 190 21 190 Harrison Tyler 110 109 190 190 St. Landry 41 12 190 West Baton Rouge 12 59 Hancock St.
    [Show full text]
  • ORN Road Net Element
    Unclassified Land Information Ontario Data Description ORN Road Net Element Disclaimer This technical documentation has been prepared by the Ministry of Natural Resources (the “Ministry”), representing Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario. Although every effort has been made to verify the information, this document is presented as is, and the Ministry makes no guarantees, representations or warranties with respect to the information contained within this document, either express or implied, arising by law or otherwise, including but not limited to, effectiveness, completeness, accuracy, or fitness for purpose. The Ministry is not liable or responsible for any loss or harm of any kind arising from use of this information. For an accessible version of this document, please contact Land Information Ontario at (705) 755 1878 or [email protected] ©Queens Printer for Ontario, 2019 LIO Class Description ORN Road Net Element Class Short Name: ORNELEM Version Number: 2 Class Description: The basic centreline road network features, which forms the spatial framework for the ORN. Road net elements are bound by a junction on each end, except for cul-de-sacs (loops) where there is only one junction. The ORN is segmented at real-world intersections (junctions) on the ground. Abstract Class Name: SPSLINEM Abstract Class Description: Spatial Single-Line With Measures: An object is represented by ONE and ONLY ONE line. All vertices along the arc have measures (values for x, y, m). Measures are required for dynamic segmentation/linear referencing. Example: Ontario Road Network road segments. Metadata URL: Tables in LIO Class: ORN Road Net Element ORN_ROAD_NET_ELEMENT_FT The basic centreline of road network features, which forms the spatial network of roads, composed of three types of road net elements, road element, ferry connection and virtual road.
    [Show full text]
  • Swutc/09/476660-00003-2 Compendium of Student
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. SWUTC/09/476660-00003-2 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date COMPENDIUM OF STUDENT PAPERS: 2009 October 2009 UNDERGRADUATE TRANSPORTATION SCHOLARS 6. Performing Organization Code PROGRAM 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Christopher Senesi, Stephanie Everett, Jordan Easterling and George Report 476660-00003-2 Bogonko, Authors, and H. Gene Hawkins, Editor 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DTRT07-G-0006 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Southwest Region University Transportation Center Texas Transportation Institute Texas A&M University System 14. Sponsoring Agency Code College Station, Texas 77843-3135 15. Supplementary Notes Program Director: H. Gene Hawkins, Ph.D., P.E. Participating Students: Christopher Senesi, Stephanie Everett, Jordan Easterling and George Bogonko. Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, University Transportation Centers Program. 16. Abstract This report is a compilation of research papers written by students participating in the 2009 Undergraduate Transportation Scholars Program. The ten-week summer program, now in its nineteenth year, provides undergraduate students in Civil Engineering the opportunity to learn about transportation engineering through participating in sponsored transportation research projects. The program design allows students to interact directly with a Texas A&M University faculty member or Texas Transportation Institute researcher in developing a research proposal, conducting valid research, and documenting the research results through oral presentations and research papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Streetpro US Product Guide
    StreetPro U.S. Version 9.3 PRODUCT GUIDE Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of the vendor or its representatives. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, without the written permission of MapInfo Corporation, One Global View, Troy, New York 12180-8399. © 2006 MapInfo Corporation. All rights reserved. MapInfo, the MapInfo logo and StreetPro U.S. are trademarks of MapInfo Corporation and/or its affiliates. MapInfo Corporate Headquarters: Voice: (518) 285-6000 Fax: (518) 285-6070 Sales Info Hotline: (800) 327-8627 Government Sales Hotline: (800) 619-2333 Technical Support Hotline: (518) 285-7283 Technical Support Fax: (518) 285-6080 Contact information for all MapInfo offices is located at: http://www.mapinfo.com/contactus. Adobe Acrobat® is a registered trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States. Products named herein may be trademarks of their respective manufacturers and are hereby recognized. Trademarked names are used editorially, to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intent to infringe on the trademark. November 2006 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Getting Started with StreetPro U.S.. 9 What is StreetPro Display and StreetPro EAL? . .10 Accessing your StreetPro U.S. Data Quickly . .10 Got MapInfo Professional? Use Workspaces! . .11 Got MapX or MapXtreme Windows? Use Geosets!. .12 Got MapXtreme Java Edition? Use Map Definition Files! . .12 Got MapXtreme? Use Map Workspace Files! . .13 Reviewing the StreetPro Tools . .14 StreetPro Features . .14 New Features in StreetPro 9.3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts
    Massachusetts A Study by the Historic US Route 20 Association, INC September 2017 1926 US HIGHWAY SHIELD 1960 – Present US HIGHWAY SHIELD HISTORIC ROUTE 20 SIGN Welcome! Since 2013, the Historic US Route 20 Association has traveled across Massachusetts, meeting with various Visitors Bureaus, Chambers of Commerce, Cities, Economic Development offices and more to discuss traveling US Route 20 and the designation of the original 1926 highway alignment as Historic Route 20. This study is a outcome of our recent visits, follow-ups and details for the future. Prepared by Bryan Farr – President, Historic US Route 20 April 24, 2017 Cover: Copy of the 1929 Massachusetts State Highway Map. ▪ Purpose – to designate and recognize the original 1926 alignment of US Route 20 as a State “Historic Route/Highway” in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. ▪ Objective – to promote travel & tourism and economic development by placing wayfinding signs (Historic Markers) on the original 1926 alignments of US Route 20 in Massachusetts. ▪ Goals – ▪ To work with the 31 towns and cities on the current & former alignments of US Route 20 in Massachusetts to erect Historic Route 20 signs on their respective sections of highway. ▪ To increase travel and tourism on the US 20 across Massachusetts ▪ Bring people back into the small towns ▪ To connect with other communities and states that are on US Route 20 ▪ To make Historic Route 20 a tourist destination, similar to the iconic Route 66 ▪ A 501 (c) 3 Non Profit organization founded in 2012, recognized Public Charity and Economic Development ▪ Federal EIN 46-0837490 ▪ We aim to promote travel & tourism and economic development on the original 1926 alignment of US Route 20 across the United States by working with local communities, economic development offices, visitor’s bureaus and chamber’s of commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victory Highway in Nevada MPDF
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. ___X___ New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Victory Highway in Nevada B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Victory Highway, Statewide, 1921-1926 Victory Highway/US 40 and National Numbered Highway System, Statewide, 1927-1939 C. Form Prepared by: Name/Title Alex Borger, Liz Boyer, Chad Moffett and Timothy Smith Cultural Resources Specialists Organization Mead & Hunt, Inc. Street & Number 180 Promenade Circle, Suite 240 City or Town Sacramento State CA Zip Code 95834 Email [email protected] Telephone 916-971-3961 Date April 2020 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ _Nevada SHPO____________ ________________ Signature of Certifying Official Title Date _Nevada State Historic Preservation Office____________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal Government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory [ Edit ] Regulatory Signs Give Instructions to Motorists, Pedestrians, and Cyclists
    6/4/2018 Road signs in the United States - Wikipedia Regulatory [ edit ] Regulatory signs give instructions to motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists. Signs such as stop, no parking, no turns, and yield are considered regulatory signs. Some have special shapes, such as the octagon for the stop sign and the X shape for railroad crossings. Some signs can be localized, such as no parking, and some are only found in state and local jurisdictions as they are based on state or local laws, such as New York City's "Don't Block the Box" signs. These signs are in the R series of signs in the MUTCD and typically in the R series in most state supplements or state MUTCDs. R1 Series: Stop and Yield [ edit ] The MUTCD's R1 series is for stop and yield. As not all situations are covered, several states have their own standards in addition to the MUTCD. The 4-WAY and 3-WAY plaques (R1-3) were deprecated in the 2009 Edition of the MUTCD in favor of the ALL WAY plaque (R1-4P). Stop and Yield Stop Yield All way plate Yield to State law Yield to State law stop for pedestrians, pedestrians in pedestrians in New York C ity crosswalk crosswalk 4-way plate 3-way plate Yield here to Yield here to Stop here for Stop here for pedestrians pedestrians (alt) pedestrians pedestrians (alt) Wait On Stop Go On Slow Except Right Turn (plaque) R2 Series: Speed Limit [ edit ] The MUTCD's R2 series is for speed limit signs. Some state supplements and state MUTCDs place various speed limit signs in other series.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Dictionary Location ID Is a Four to Six Digit Count Section Identifier Used to Reference Locations Where Traffic Data Is Collected
    Traffic Monitoring Section Data Dictionary Location ID is a four to six digit count section identifier used to reference locations where traffic data is collected. The Location ID can be utilized to access detailed traffic data in the Transportation Data Management System (TDMS) • Four digit count section identifiers (i.e. 7701) are associated with ramps and crossovers on the state highway system (i.e. 7701) • Five digit count section identifier (i.e. 53035) are associate with traffic count section located on roadway sections owned by local agencies • Six digit count section identifiers (i.e. 100007) are associated with mainline roadway segments on the state highway system (i.e. 100007) Definitions of Alpha-Numeric Route Designations Route is the alpha numeric route designation of the highway. The number is the signed route number of the highway appearing on the shield. Interstate (I) represents the networks of access controlled highways that form the National Highway System • Interstates (I) are signed with an Interstate Highway shield US Routes (US) are a nationwide network of roads and highways that form the Federal Highways • US Routes (US)are signed with a US Highway shield State Routes (SR) are roadways that are owned and maintained by the state of Arizona. • State Routes (SR) are signed by the Arizona Route shield The following are Signed Route Qualifiers where: • A is an Alternate Route • B is a Business Route • L Is Loop Route • S is a Spur Route • T is a Truck Route • X is a Temporary Route • Y is a Wye Leg Route • (N) indicates the numerical sequence of a discontinuous route.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean-To-Ocean Highway
    Ocean to Ocean Highway and U.S. 60 Originally published in El Defensor Chieftain automobile could be used to drive across the newspaper, Saturday, November 10, 2012. country — even though previous attempts had Copyright: © 2012 by Paul Harden. Article may be cited with proper failed. credit to author. Article is not to be reproduced in whole or placed on For the challenge, he hired Sewall Crocker to be the internet without author’s permission. his mechanic and backup driver. Crocker convinced Nelson to purchase a Winton touring By Paul Harden car for the trip. The Winton was considered a For El Defensor Chieftain robust car for the day, and sported a 20 [email protected] horsepower engine. On May 23, the duo departed San Francisco in Today, Socorro is a crossroad city for the their attempt to reach New York City. In those automobile. How Socorro ended up being at the days, there were no auto roads. Instead, one used crossroads of an Interstate Highway and a coast- wagon roads, followed railroad tracks, or any to-coast U.S. highway is an interesting story. other path to be found. Nelson elected to take a northern route through Sacramento to join the Credit for the first automobile goes to Karl Oregon Trail. Benz, of Germany. It was patented in 1886. Travel on the mountain roads was rough and Powered by a gasoline internal combustion bouncy, and the pair lost half their camping engine, the vehicle consisted of two drive wheels equipment in the first week. Block and tackle was in the rear and a single wheel in front for steering.
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Speed Limit
    OREGON IDAHO TO TWIN FALLS TO ADEL TO FIELDS TO JORDAN VALLEY TO MOUNTAIN HOME Denio 292 Jackpot McDermitt Owyhee 140 Denio 93 Jct 225 Jarbidge 95 Mountain City Contact 140 293 Orovada Paradise Jack Valley Creek TO PARK VALLEY 140 290 226 Montello Midas TO CEDARVILLE HUMBOLDT ELKO 233 Wells 95 80 ALT Deeth 93 Oasis 789 225 230 Halleck Winnemucca 232 Golconda 229 80 294 766 Elko TO SALT LAKE CITY WASHOE 95 Lamoille 806 227 West Imlay Wendover Carlin 228 229 Gerlach Mill City Battle 80 Mountain ALT PERSHING 400 Beowawe 93 278 767 306 401 305 93 Jiggs Ruby Crescent Valley Valley 398 Currie TO IBAPAH 399 447 Lovelock Pyramid 445 397 Lake Lages Station Sutcliffe Cherry 446 Creek Nixon 80 LANDER EUREKA ALT TO SUSANVILLE 445 95 447 CHURCHILL 395 278 Strawberry CALIFORNIA 93 Sparks 305 Reno ALT WHITE PINE Fernley 50 ALT Fallon 50 892 80 Austin 50 Eureka STOREY 439 95 121 50 116 490 TO TRUCKEE Virginia 117 Cold 50 431 City Silver Springs McGill 893 Incline 50 Springs 120 Village 580 ALT Ruth 722 UTAH TO TAHOE CITY Dayton 95 Ely 28 95 Lake LYON Middlegate Kingston CARSON Wabuska 839 6 Tahoe CITY 50 Border 395 361 376 6 50 DOUGLAS ALT TO DELTA 95 Baker Stateline Minden Majors 894 Gardnerville Schurz Ione 488 TO PLACERVILLE 339 Yerington Preston Place Duckwater TO GARRISON 395 844 487 207 206 823 208 Gabbs Lund 379 Shoshone 88 Carvers 318 TO WOODFORDS Wellington Holbrook 361 Hadley Round Currant Jct 208 Mountain 338 Walker 6 TO BRIDGEPORT Lake Belmont Lockes 95 Manhattan Hawthorne Luning Sunnyside 93 377 MINERAL Mina TO BRIDGEPORT 359 Warm 376 Springs
    [Show full text]
  • NCDOT Route Arcs Field Descriptions
    NCRouteArcs Field Descriptions General Notes: The layer contains route data maintained by the state and counties. Fields dropped from the previous output product will be listed in the ‘Removed Fields’ section. X indicates that the definition is stated once but applies to each co-route 2-6. The LRS supports a dominant route (1) and up to 5 additional co-routes (2 – 6) for each segment. For example, the definition for RouteIDX applies to all of the following fields: RouteID2, RouteID3, RouteID4, RouteID5 and RouteID6. The Data Owner is the group that is responsible for maintaining that data item. There may be one or more additional business owners associated with that information, but the Data Owner should be the first group to contact when there is a question about the data in this Layer. Domains are represented as coded values and descriptions. The geodatabase version of the file contains the descriptions. The shapefile version contains the values, which tend to be abbreviated or numeric versions of the description. If the geodatabase table is exported, the resulting table will contain the values. NCRouteCharacteristics is a dual-carriageway system meaning that divided roads (roads with medians) are represented as two separate lines and undivided roads are represented as a single line. This allows for different characteristics to be coded on each side of the route. On divided roads, most characteristics apply to just that side of the road. The 11-Digit RouteID is a unique number assigned to each route. The first digit represents the route class, the second digit represents a route qualifier (for example a business route), the third digit represents the inventory or non-inventory direction, the fourth digit through eighth digit represents the route number and lastly, the last three digits represent the Sap County code.
    [Show full text]