Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual February 2020 © 2020 by Texas Department of Transportation (512) 463-8630 all rights reserved Manual Notice 2020-1 From: Michael A. Chacon, P.E. Manual: Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual Effective Date: February 13, 2020 Purpose The purpose of this manual is to provide information and internal procedures for the placement and use of various types of signs on state roadways. This manual is not meant to be comprehensive, but rather to provide additional information and procedures specific to Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) operations not covered in the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD). Contents The Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual was originally published in March of 2006 as the Signs and Markings Manual to provide guidance on the proper placement of guide signs, which are discussed in Chapter 7. The manual was revised in 2017 to include additional chapters on sign location and installation, sign materials and supports, sign maintenance, regulatory and warning signs, as well as other miscellaneous signs. The 2020-1 Revision removes several sentences of information from Chapter 7, Section 17 that were inconsistent with the Texas Transportation Code. Contact For information on the contents of the Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual, contact Doug Skowronek by email at [email protected], or by phone at 512-416-3120. Archives Previous editions of the Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual can be found in archives. Table of Contents Chapter 1 — Introduction Section 1 — Overview. 1-2 Purpose of this Handbook . 1-2 Importance of Uniformity . 1-2 Section 2 — Authority to Install Signs . 1-3 Legal Authority . 1-3 Payment by Others for Installation of Traffic Control Devices . 1-3 Illegal Traffic Control Devices . 1-4 Section 3 — Reference Sources. 1-5 Introduction . 1-5 The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) . 1-5 Using the TMUTCD . 1-5 Standard Highway Sign Designs for Texas (SHSD) . 1-5 Other Resources. 1-6 Chapter 2 — Sign Location Section 1 — Overview. 2-2 Requirements of Effective Signs . 2-2 Basic Considerations . 2-2 More Information. 2-3 Section 2 — Determining Location . 2-4 Determination of Need . 2-4 Field Review . 2-4 Physical Features of Sign Placement. 2-4 Back to Back Mounting. 2-4 Mounting Height . 2-5 Lateral Clearance. 2-5 Rural Intersections. 2-5 Chapter 3 — Sign Materials and Supports Section 1 — Roadside Sign Supports . 3-2 Introduction . 3-2 Foundations . 3-2 Types of Supports . 3-2 Section 2 — Sign and Substrate Structure. 3-4 Substrate . 3-4 Structural Support System . 3-4 Sign Guidelines and Applications Manual i TxDOT 2/2020 Overhead Sign Walkways . 3-4 Section 3 — Retroreflectorization . 3-5 Introduction . 3-5 Retroreflective Sheeting Types . 3-5 Fluorescent Retroreflective Sheeting Types . 3-5 TxDOT Standard . 3-5 Deterioration of Retroreflectivity . 3-5 Section 4 — Sign Legends. 3-7 Introduction . 3-7 Font Types . 3-7 Symbols . 3-7 Application Methods . 3-8 Section 5 — Sign Identification Decal . 3-9 Decal Required . 3-9 Purpose . 3-9 Use of Decal . 3-9 Fabrication Coding . 3-10 Installation Coding . 3-11 Section 6 — Storage and Transport . 3-13 Storage . 3-13 Transport . 3-13 Section 7 — Special Sign Applications . 3-14 Flashing Beacons Attached to Sign . 3-14 Portable Changeable Message Signs . 3-14 Dynamic Message Signs . 3-14 Bilingual Signs . 3-14 Chapter 4 — Sign Maintenance Section 1 — Overview. 4-2 Introduction . 4-2 Maintenance in Cities . ..
Recommended publications
  • Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes Using Microscopic Simulation
    Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Microscopic Simulation Chao Li A Thesis in The Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Applied Science in Civil Engineering at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada Fall 2016 © Chao Li, 2016 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Chao Li Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Entitled: Microscopic Simulation and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Applied Science (Civil Engineering) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Dr. A. M. Hanna Chair Dr. J. Y. Yu Examiner Dr. Z. Zhu Examiner Dr. C. Alecsandru Supervisor Approved by Dr. Fariborz Haghighat Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director Dr. Amir Asif Dean of Faculty Date Fall, 2016 ABSTRACT Vehicular Safety and Operations Assessment of Reserved Lanes using Microscopic Simulation Chao Li Evaluation of roadway safety via the analysis of vehicular conflicts using microscopic simulation shows increasing preference among transportation professionals, mostly due to significant advances in computational technology that allows for better efficiency when compared with other traffic safety modeling approaches. In addition, since modeling vehicular interactions via simulation is intrinsic to the methodology, one may assess various impacts of safety treatments without disrupting vehicle movements and before proceeding with real-world implementations. VISSIM, a microscopic traffic simulation model, is used in this thesis to reproduce vehicular interactions of an urban High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) arterial in Québec.
    [Show full text]
  • ROAD SAFETY: BASIC FACTS © Panos / Jacob Silberberg
    FACT SHEET #1 ROAD SAFETY: BASIC FACTS © Panos / Jacob Silberberg ROAD SAFETY AND MEDIA REPORTING Road traffic crashes are often covered in the media simply as events—not as a leading killer of people and an enormous drain on a country’s human, health and financial resources. By framing road safety as a health and development story, with data and in-depth information, journalists have the opportunity to affect the way these stories are told and potentially to help shift public behaviour and attitudes, influence policy and therefore contribute towards saving lives. WHY ARE ROAD TRAFFIC INJURIES A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE? Road traffic injuries and deaths have a terrible 1.25 million impact on individuals, communities and road traffic deaths occur every year. countries. They involve massive costs to often overburdened health care systems, occupy scarce hospital beds, consume resources and result in significant losses of productivity and prosperity, with deep social and economic repercussions. The numbers speak for themselves: this is a cause of death among public health and development crisis that is expected to worsen unless action is taken. #1those aged 15-29 years For more on: road traffic injuries Global death figures drive home the extent of this public health crisis, especially among young people. FACT SHEET #1 Road safety: Basic facts – page 1 The chance 9.3 of dying Europe 19.9 in a road Eastern Mediterranean 17.0 traffic crash 15.9 South East Asia Americas 26.6 depends on where Africa 17.3 you live INTERPRETING THE NUMBERS MAGNITUDE • Tallying the total number of deaths can, • About 1.25 million people globally die each year however, be useful for conveying the magnitude as a result of road traffic crashes—that’s over 3400 of the problem, the prevention effort required deaths a day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saskatchewan Gazette, February 14, 2014 293 (Regulations)/Ce Numéro Ne Contient Pas De Partie Iii (Règlements)
    THIS ISSUE HAS NO PART III THE SASKATCHEWAN GAZETTE, FEBRUARY 14, 2014 293 (REGULATIONS)/CE NUMÉRO NE CONTIENT PAS DE PARTIE III (RÈGLEMENTS) The Saskatchewan Gazette PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY AUTHORITY OF THE QUEEN’S PRINTER/PUBLIÉE CHAQUE SEMAINE SOUS L’AUTORITÉ DE L’ImPRIMEUR DE LA REINE PART I/PARTIE I Volume 110 REGINA, FRIDAY, february 14, 2014/REGINA, VENDREDI, 14 FÉVRIER 2014 No. 7/nº 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS/TABLE DES MATIÈRES PART I/PARTIE I SPECIAL DAYS/JOURS SPÉCIAUX ................................................................................................................................................ 294 PROGRESS OF BILLS/RAPPORT SUR L’éTAT DES PROJETS DE LOI (Third Session, Twenty-Seventh Legislative Assembly/Troisième session, 27e Assemblée législative) ........................................... 294 ACTS NOT YET PROCLAIMED/LOIS NON ENCORE PROCLAMÉES ..................................................................................... 295 ACTS IN FORCE ON ASSENT/LOIS ENTRANT EN VIGUEUR SUR SANCTION (Third Session, Twenty-Seventh Legislative Assembly/Troisième session, 27e Assemblée législative) ........................................... 299 ACTS IN FORCE ON SPECIFIC EVENTS/LOIS ENTRANT EN VIGUEUR À DES OCCURRENCES PARTICULIÈRES..... 299 ACTS PROCLAIMED/LOIS PROCLAMÉES (2013) ........................................................................................................................ 300 ACTS PROCLAIMED/LOIS PROCLAMÉES (2014) .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2B-1 Application of Regulatory Signs Regulatory
    6. REGULATORY SIGNS 2B-1 Application of Regulatory Signs Regulatory signs inform highway users of traffic laws or regulations and indicate the applicability of legal requirements that would not oth- erwise be apparent. These signs shall be erected wherever needed to fulfill this purpose, but unnecessary mandates should be avoided. The laws of many States specify that certain regulations are enforceable only when made known by official signs. Some regulatory signs are related to operational controls but do not impose any obligations or prohibitions. For example, signs giving ad- vance notice of or marking the end of a restricted zone are included in the regulatory group. Regulatory signs normally shall be erected at those locations where regulations apply. The sign message shall clearly indicate the require- ments imposed by the regulation and shall be easily visible and legible to the vehicle operator. 2B-2 Classification of Regulatory Signs Regulatory signs are classified in the following groups: 1. Right-of-way series: (a) STOP sign (sec. 2B-4 to 6) (b) YIELD sign (sec. 2B-7 to 9) 2. Speed series (sec. 2B-10 to 14) 3. Movement series: (a) Turning (see. 2B-15 to 19) (b) Alignment (sec. 2B-20 to 25) (c) Exclusion (see. 2B-26 to 28) (d) One Way (sec. 2B-29 to 30) 4. Parking series (see. 2B-31 to 34) 5. Pedestrian series (see. 2B-35 to 36) 6. Miscellaneous series (sec. 2B-37 to 44) 2B-3 Design of Regulatory Signs Regulatory signs are rectangular, with the longer dimension vertical, and have black legend on a white background, except for those signs whose standards specify otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Alternative Traffic Signs for Use in Texas Border Areas
    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWAffX-99/1274-3 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE TRAFFIC SIGNS FOR USE IN March 1999 TEXAS BORDER AREAS 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. H. Gene Hawkins, Jr., Dale L. Picha, Deborah C. Kreis, and Michael Report 1274-3 A. Knodler 9. Performing Organization Name and Address lO. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System 11. Contract or Grant No. College Station, Texas 77843-3135 Project No. 0-1274 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Research: Research and Technology Transfer Office September 1995 - August 1998 P. O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, Texas 78763-5080 15 Supplementary Notes Research performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Research Project Title: Traffic Control Devices for Drivers in Texas Border Areas 16. Abstract A three-year research project evaluated driver understanding of traffic control devices in Texas border areas. The report describes the activities and findings of the third and final year of the research study. In the third year, two surveys were conducted in both border and non-border locations. The passenger car driver survey addressed the Stop for School Bus, Fasten Safety Belts, and Right Lane Ends signs, plus the sign shape/color code. Spanish-language alternative legends were developed for each standard sign.
    [Show full text]
  • GDOT Signing and Marking Design Guidelines
    Signing and Marking Design Guidelines 8/10/2021 Revision 6.1 Atlanta, GA 30308 This document was developed as part of the continuing effort to provide guidance within the Georgia Department of Transportation in fulfilling its mission to provide a safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation system through dedicated teamwork and responsible leadership supporting economic development, environmental sensitivity and improved quality of life. This document is not intended to establish policy within the Department, but to provide guidance in adhering to the policies of the Department. Your comments, suggestions, and ideas for improvements are welcomed. Please send comments to: State Design Policy Engineer Georgia Department of Transportation One Georgia Center 600 West Peachtree Street, N.W., 26th Floor Atlanta, Georgia 30308 DISCLAIMER The Georgia Department of Transportation maintains this printable document and is solely responsible for ensuring that it is equivalent to the approved Department guidelines. Signing and Marking Design Guidelines Revision History Revision Number Revision Date Revision Summary All - Revised and Combined Interstate and Limited Access 2.0 11/2008 Roadway Signing and Marking Design Guidelines and Non- Interstate Signing and Marking Design Guidelines 2.1 1/2011 All - Revised Figures Chapter 2 - Removed section 2.6 Detail Estimate Chapter 3 - Added Bicycle Warning and Share the Road Sign Guidance and Revised Figures Specified 36” for Warning Signs on State Routes Appendix A - Revised Legend and Figures 3.0 12/2013 All – Major Revision 3.1 10/2015 Section 2.4 - Changed General Notes location. Section 2.5 - Changed the Reflective Sheeting Section 3.1- Removed pavement marking plans Section 3.1.2 - Changed “or” to “and/or”.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgiving Roadsides Design Guide
    Forgiving roadsides design guide Page 2 / 117 Authors: This report was drawn up by the IRDES ERA-NET 'Safety at the Heart of Road Design' Team: Author: Francesca La Torre, UNIFI, Italy (Representing ANAS in CEDR TG Road Safety) Contributors : Matthias Helfert, AIT, Austria Lorenzo Domenichini, UNIFI, Italy Philippe Nitsche, AIT, Austria Alessandro Mercaldo, UNIFI, Italy Yann Goyat, IFSTTAR, France Helen Fagerlind, CHALMERS, Sweden Eleonora Cesolini, ANAS, Italy Jan Martinsson, CHALMERS, Sweden Raffaella Grecco, ANAS, Italy Dennis Book, CHALMERS, Sweden Federica Bianchin, ANAS, Italy Peter Saleh, AIT, Austria (Main author of Annex A) With editorial input from the following members of CEDR Technical Group Road Safety: Harry Cullen Ireland (Chair) Francesca LA TORRE Italy Forbes VIGORS Ireland (Sec) Barbara RUBINO Italy Eva EICHINGER-VILL Austria Paul MANGEN Luxembourg Didier ANTOINE Belgium-Wallonia Herman MONING Netherlands Photis MATSIS Cyprus Arild ENGEBRETSEN Norway Reigo UDE Estonia Arild RAGNOY Norway Auli FORSBERG Finland Leszek KANIA Poland Gerard VUILLEMIN France Zvonko ZAVASNIK Slovenia Stefan MATENA Germany Roberto LLAMAS Spain Christina PANAGOLIA Greece Jose M. PARDILLO Spain Tibor MOCSÁRI Hungary Lena RYDEN Sweden Audur ARNADOTTIR Iceland Christoph JAHN Switzerland Giovanni MAGARO Italy Sandra BROWN United Kingdom This document expresses solely the current view of CEDR. Readers should not regard these views as a statement of the official position of CEDR's member states. Equally this document is considered as a guide; it is not a legally binding document. Approved and amended by: CEDR's EXECUTIVE BOARD on 7 March 2013 Addressed to: CEDR's GOVERNING BOARD on 15 May 2013 Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat General ISBN : 979-10-93321-02-8 Forgiving roadsides design guide Page 3 / 117 Foreword CEDR Technical Group Road Safety (TGRS) is very proud to have delivered one of the most significant documents in recent years on the subject of forgiving roadsides.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.8.1 the ASCII Table for Computer Braille Input
    2.8.1 The ASCII table for computer Braille input PLUS: dots 3-4-6 Comma: dot 6 Dash: dots 3-6 Period: dots 4-6 Slash: dots 3-4 Exclamation mark: dots 2-3-4-6 Quotation mark: dot 5 Number sign: dots 3-4-5-6 Dollar sign: dots 1-2-4-6 Percent: dots 1-4-6 Ampersand: dots 1-2-3-4-6 Apostrophe: dot 3 Left parenthesis: dots 1-2-3-5-6 Right parenthesis: dots 2-3-4-5-6 Asterisk: dots 1-6 Colon: dots 1-5-6 Semi colon: dots 5-6 Less than: dots 1-2-6 Equal: dots 1-2-3-4-5-6 Great than: dots 3-4-5 Question mark: dots 1-4-5-6 At sign: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dot 4 Left bracket: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 2-4-6 Back slash: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-5-6 Right bracket: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-4-5-6 Carat: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 4-5 Underscore: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 4-5-6 Grave accent: dots 4 Left brace: dots 2-4-6 Vertical bar: dots 1-2-5-6 Right brace: dots 1-2-4-5-6 Tilde: dots 4-5 A: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dot 1 B: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2 C: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-4 D: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-4-5 E: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-5 F: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-4 G: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-4-5 H: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-5 I: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 2-4 J: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 2-4-5 K: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-3 L: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-3 M: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-3-4 N: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-3-4-5 O: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-3-5 P: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-3-4 Q: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-3-4-5 R: Space-u (dots 1-3-6), dots 1-2-3-5 S: Space-u (dots
    [Show full text]
  • City of Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Study
    City of Hamilton CITY OF HAMILTON TRUCK ROUTE MASTER PLAN STUDY FINAL REPORT APRIL 2010 IBI G ROU P FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT CONTROL Client: City of Hamilton Project Name: City of Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Study Report Title: City of Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Study IBI Reference: 20492 Version: V 1.0 - Final Digital Master: J:\20492_Truck_Route\10.0 Reports\TTR_Truck_Route_Master_Plan_Study_FINAL_2010-04-23.docx\2010-04-23\J Originator: Ron Stewart, Matt Colwill, Ted Gill, Scott Fraser Reviewer: Ron Stewart Authorization: Ron Stewart Circulation List: History: V0.1 - Draft April 2010 IBI G ROU P FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of the Truck Route Master Plan ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Master Plan Scope ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Master Plan Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Consultation and Communication ....................................................................................................... 4 1.6 Implementation and Interpretation
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Reference Marker (TRM) System User’S Manual
    Texas Reference Marker (TRM) System User’s Manual Revised January 2005 © 2005 by Texas Department of Transportation (512) 302-2453 all rights reserved Manual Notice 2005-1 From: James L. Randall, P.E. Manual: Texas Reference Marker System User’s Manual Effective Date: January 01, 2005 Contents The manual provides Texas Reference Marker (trm) System Highway Data File users with the nec- essary information to input data to, or extract data from TRM. This manual is contained in the Planning, Programming, Environmental collection of the TxDOT Online Manual System. Changes Chapters 1 and 2 - Changed references from Design Division to Construction Division. Chapter 3 - Changed references from Design Division to Construction Division and added infor- mation about the new User Information screen and the Board. Chapter 4 - Added subsection for TRM Export instructions. Chapter 6 - Updated TPP Highway Values to include all District Highway Status Values. Chapter 7 - Updated instruction tables to reflect changes for inputting Reference updates. Chapter 8 - Clarified constraints. Chapter 10 - Updated of Travel responsibilities and Highway Values; Left/Right is now Shoulder Inside/Outside; Changed references from Design Division to Construction Division. Chapter 12 - Updated Design and Route values. Chapter 14 - Clarified references to the TPP website and updated graphics to reflect the look of the current. Contact Refer questions or suggestions to the Special Projects and Audit Branch of the Administration Sec- tion of the Transportation Planning and Programming Division. Archives Past manual notices are available in a PDF archive. Table of Contents Chapter 1 — Texas Reference Marker System Section 1 — Introduction to TRM . 1-2 What is TRM? .
    [Show full text]
  • Vtrans Road Centerline Spatial Data User Guide December 2019
    VTrans Road Centerline Spatial Data User Guide December 2019 Mapping Section Policy, Planning and Intermodal Development Division 219 North Main Street, Barre, VT 05641 Tel: 802‐828‐2600 https://vtrans.vermont.gov/planning/maps Read the metadata. V:\Projects\Shared\Mapping\_MappingSection_DataDictionary\RDSMALL_UserGuide\VTrans_Road_Centerline_User_Guide_20191231.docx VTRANS ROAD CENTERLINE SPATIAL DATA USER GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 4 User Guide Background ............................................................................................................................ 4 Background of the Road Centerline Data Set ........................................................................................... 4 Release Notes – 2019‐12‐31 ..................................................................................................................... 5 Terminology .............................................................................................................................................. 5 DATA DESIGN AND MODEL ........................................................................................................................... 6 Model Features ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Units and Coordinate System ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Building Basic Formulas
    05 0789731533 CH03 5/18/04 11:12 AM Page 53 Building Basic Formulas A worksheet is merely a lifeless collection of num- bers and text until you define some kind of relation- 3 ship among the various entries. You do this by creating formulas that perform calculations and pro- duce results. This chapter takes you through some formula basics, including constructing simple arith- IN THIS CHAPTER metic and text formulas, understanding the all- Understanding Formula Basics . .53 important topic of operator precedence, copying Understanding Operator Precedence . .57 and moving worksheet formulas, and making for- mulas easier to build and read by taking advantage Controlling Worksheet Calculation . .59 of range names. Copying and Moving Formulas . .61 Displaying Worksheet Formulas . .64 Understanding Formula Basics Converting a Formula to a Value . .65 Most worksheets are created to provide answers to Working with Range Names in Formulas . .66 specific questions: What is the company’s profit? Are expenses over or under budget, and by how Working with Links in Formulas . .70 much? What is the future value of an investment? Formatting Numbers,Dates,and Times . .72 How big will an employee bonus be this year? You can answer these questions, and an infinite variety of others, by using Excel formulas. All Excel formulas have the same general structure: an equals sign (=) followed by one or more operands—which can be a value, a cell reference, a range, a range name, or a function name—sepa- rated by one or more operators—the symbols that combine the operands in some way, such as the plus sign (+) and the greater-than sign (>).
    [Show full text]