PPC 3 and 4 – Costings with Responses Budget 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PPC 3 and 4 – Costings with Responses Budget 2021 PPC 3 and 4 – Costings with Responses Budget 2021 1. Indexation of Welfare Payments 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: To provide in tabular form, listed by payment type, the cost of increasing all social welfare payments under the following scenarios: Scenario 1 – a €5 increase on each weekly and monthly payment Scenario 2 – a €10 increase on each weekly and monthly payment Scenario 3 – indexation of all payments in line with increases to HICP Scenario 4 – indexation of all payments in line with assumed wage growth (compensation per employee) in 2021. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? To use existing assumptions regarding the cohort who will continue to receive each category of payment during 2021. To include all benefits and allowances. To also provide the cost of such increases if introduced from the week beginning 4th January 2021 and 1st March 2021. Reply See Appendix 5 The costings requested above are outlined in the spreadsheet supplied. Please note that costings are on the basis of the estimated number of recipients in 2020, for all schemes except Jobseeker’s Allowance and Jobseeker’s Benefit, which are based on the estimated number of recipients in 2021. The department is finalising the Outturn for 2020 and ELS including recipient numbers for 2021, and as such these costings are subject to change 2. Increased participation fees for activation schemes 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: To provide in tabular form, listed by scheme, the cost of increasing participation fees for all activation schemes under the following scenarios: Scenario 1 – a €2.50 increase on each weekly payment Scenario 2 – a €5.00 increase on each weekly payment Scenario 3 – indexation of all payments in line with increases to HICP Scenario 4 – indexation of all payments in line with assumed wage growth (compensation per employee) in 2021. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? To use existing assumptions regarding the cohort who will continue to receive each category of payment during 2021. To also provide the cost of such increases if introduced from the week beginning Monday 4th March. Reply The costings requested above are outlined in the spreadsheet supplied. Please note that costings are on the basis of the estimated number of recipients in 2020, for all schemes except Jobseeker’s Allowance and Jobseeker’s Benefit, which are based on the estimated number of recipients in 2021. The department is finalising the Outturn for 2020 and ELS including recipient numbers for 2021, and as such these costings are subject to change. 3. State Pension Age 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: A) The cost to the Department in 2021 of not increasing the eligibility age for the State pension to 67, retaining 66. B) The cost of introducing a State transition pension in 2021 for those who are forced to retire at 65, but are not eligible to receive the State pension until they turn 66. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? For (A) based on expected claim numbers, and for (B) based on number of those aged 65 signing on for benefits or credits. Reply A) State Pension Age Based on recent modelling , the Department’s best current estimate for the additional net costs per annum of not increasing State Pension Age to 67 years in 2021 range from in excess of €200m in 2021 (due to a first year effect) to an average of over €400 million per annum thereafter, with this increasing every year. These estimates are net costs and take into consideration additional increases or reductions arising in PRSI receipts, movements from other social welfare schemes, and secondary benefit entitlements including Free Travel, Fuel Allowance, Household Benefit Payment and Telephone Allowance. The estimates are based on current rates of payments and do not make any provision for rate increases. The cost of these estimates would be expected to double from 2028, should the State Pension Age not increase to 68, as is currently legislated for. B) State Transition Pension The Department’s best current estimate for the gross cost of reintroducing State Pension (Transition), on the same basis as it previously operated, is €293 million for a full year. It is expected that these costs would be offset somewhat by savings of €166 million on Working Age Schemes, arising from recipients transferring from these schemes to State Pension (Transition), giving a net cost of €127 million each year. These figures are based on current payment rates. This costing was calculated based on analysis of the observed ratio of SPT awards to State Pension (Contributory) awards for the period from 2009 to 2012, and projecting this forward in terms of estimated recipient numbers in coming years. The estimates are based on current rates of payments and do not make any provision for rate increases. It should be noted that the above costings are subject to change in the context of emerging trends and associated revisions of the estimated numbers of recipients 4. Contributory Welfare 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: The detailed costs of introducing an income linked job seekers payment amounting to up to €30 a week extra above existing benefit levels, as a first step towards creating a system of contributory welfare that recognises that those who contribute to our social insurance fund should benefit when they need it most. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? To assume the introduction of the scheme with effect from January 2021, noting any technical issues that may prevent such early introduction. To provide for a maximum additional payment of €30 per week in cases where a person has been in continuous, full- time employment, earning over €30,000 per year. Reply The total estimated cost of increasing Jobseeker’s Benefit for those with previous earnings above €30,000 per year is €17.2 million, based on the estimated number of Jobseeker’s Benefit recipients in 2020. Issues: IT development may cause implementation delays Delay in receipt of data from Revenue Inflows and outflows to/from Jobseeker’s Benefit The earnings data from Revenue arrives as an annual figure for each customer. It is not possible to ascertain if the earnings were from continuous full-time employment Facts: Calculation is made on 2019 figures as this is last full year that data is available The number of Casual Jobseeker’s Benefit recipients are not included so if they are included then the costing would increase On average 28% of JB recipients had earnings of €30,000 or over every year since 2016. The costing below may increase as earnings data is missing for almost 2,000 cases. If we apply the 28% to that figure then the costing could increase by €873,600 (520 x €30 x 52) Workings: 2019 - Average weekly number of JB recipients 32,750 2019 - On average 29% of JB recipients had earnings of €30,000 or over in the GCY 29% of 32750 = 9,497.5 9,497.5 x €30 x 52 = €14,816,100 rounded to €14.8 million If costing is applied to provisional number of JB recipients for 2020 as 2021 is not yet available 2020 – Provisional number of JB recipients is 38,120 2019- On average 29% of JB recipients had earnings of €30,000 or over in GCY 29% of 38,120=11,054.8 11,054.8 x €30 x 52 = €17,245,488 rounded to €17.24 million 5. Child Benefit 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: A) The cost of increasing Child benefit payment by €5 per month, and €10 per month respectively. B) The cost of expanding Child Benefit to parents with children who have passed their 18th birthdays but remain in second-level education. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? For B, current school participation rates should be assumed as constant for the purpose of this costing. Reply (A) The estimated cost of a €5 increase per month is €74m and a €10 increase is estimated to cost €148m in a full year. (B) Child benefit is a monthly payment made to families with children in respect of all qualified children up to the age of 16 years. The payment continues to be paid in respect of children until their 18th birthday when they are in full-time education, or if they have a disability. It is estimated that the cost to extend the child benefit payment to 18 year olds in secondary level education is an additional €58.3m per year. 6. Increase for Qualified Child Payment 1. Detailed description of item or policy on which a costing is required: The cost of a €1, €3, €5 and €10 increase respectively in the Qualified Child Increase payment for A) under 12’s from the current €36 B) children aged 12 and over from €40; and outline any knock-on effects on other payment schemes. To also provide the cost for similar increases to the Back to Work Family Dividend. 2. What assumptions/parameters do you wish the Department to make/specify? Using the same parameters as currently apply. Provide the response in tabular format please. Reply See Appendix 5 The costings requested above are outlined in Appendix 5. Please note that costings are on the basis of the estimated number of recipients in 2020, for all schemes except Jobseeker’s Allowance and Jobseeker’s Benefit, which are based on the estimated number of recipients in 2021.
Recommended publications
  • 0615 Richard Logue
    Future-proofing Ireland A response to the National Planning Framework Richard Logue Introduction The Central Statistics Office predicts that the State’s population will increase by 1.7 million over the next 30 years. Unless the State is proactive and plans ahead for this significant increase in population we will be faced with even more unbalanced development than we already have. John Moran, the former Secretary of the Department of Finance has proposed that a counterweight to Dublin be established in the West in order to deal with the issue of population expansion. This idea should be given very serious consideration. At present nearly all significant development in the State is focussed on the Greater Dublin Area. We have a stark choice facing us for the future of Ireland; we can either allow Dublin to grow out of control or we can re-invent some of the most deprived and remote parts of Ireland for a brighter future in an uncertain world. Richard Logue London, March 2017. Biographical note I started working for London Underground in 1989 and since then have worked on a variety of major rail projects including the Jubilee Line extension, the Thameslink Programme and more recently for Network Rail’s Anglia route. My projects include the Crossrail project, Step Free Access at Stations, and the new Lea Bridge and Cambridge North stations. I am from Quigley’s Point in County Donegal and have lived in the UK since 1985. Developing the West to its potential The proposals in this document are a radical re-think of development in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Mallow Town Park Outline Construction
    Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Client: Cork County Council Date: 22 May 2021 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET 6615_RP_CEMP01_Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Project No. 6615 Client: Cork County Council Project Name: Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Report Name: Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Document No. RP_CEMP01 Issue No. 01 Date: 22/05/2021 This document has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Status Date Prepared Checked 01 Planning 22 May 2021 DB TB Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 2 Regulatory and Policy Framework ....................................................... 6 2.1 Legislation .................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Policy & Guidance ....................................................................................... 6 3 Description of the Proposed Development .......................................... 7 4 Construction Programme and Phasing ................................................ 8 4.1 Restrictions on Working Hours ................................................................... 8 5 General Site Management ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Iarnród Éireann
    Cork Line Level Crossings Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Iarnród Éireann March 2021 EIAR Chapter 12 C ultural H eritage Iarnr ód Éir eann Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Cork Line Level Crossings Project No: 32111000 Document Title: EIAR Chapter 12 Cultural Heritage Document No. 12 Revision: A04 Date: March 2021 Client Name: Iarnród Éireann Project Manager: Alex Bradley Author: AMS Ltd Jacobs U.K. Limited Artola House 3rd & 4th Floors 91 Victoria Street Belfast BT1 4PN T +44 (0)28 9032 4452 F +44 (0)28 9033 0713 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2021 Jacobs U.K. Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved A01 December Client Review AMS AMS RM AB 2019 A02 November Interim Draft pending Archaeological AMS HC HC AB 2020 Investigations A03 March Final draft AMS AMS RM AB 2021 A04 March For Issue to An Bord Pleanála AMS AMS HC/RM AB 2021 i Volume 3, Chapter 12: Cultural Heritage Contents 12. Cultural Heritage ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Limerick City and County Council Draft Noise Action Plan
    Limerick City and County Council Draft Noise Action Plan May 2018 Noise Action Plan 1 Noise Action Plan 2 Executive Summary The Environmental Noise Directive (2002/49/EC) aims to put in place a European wide system for identifying sources of environmental noise, informing the public about relevant noise data and taking the necessary steps to avoid, prevent or reduce noise exposure. The Directive was transposed into Irish Law by Statutory Instrument 140 of 2006, known as the Environmental Noise Regulations. This Noise Action Plan has been prepared in accordance with those regulations and is aimed at strategic long term management of environmental noise from transport systems i.e. traffic noise in Limerick City and County. Under the regulations, Strategic Noise Maps and Noise Action Plans were required to be prepared in respect of noise from the following sources: Sections of rail route above a flow threshold of 30,000 train passages per year; Major airports with more than 50,000 movements per year - a movement being a take off or landing; Sections of major roads with a flow threshold of 3 million vehicles per annum; Agglomerations with more than 100,000 inhabitants. As no airports or rail routes in Limerick City and County Council’s functional area were above the threshold and as the agglomeration of Limerick has less than 100,000 inhabitants, only noise from major roads is considered in this Plan. Transport Infrasturcture Ireland (TII) as the Noise Mapping Body for national roads, prepared Strategic Noise Maps for all relevant motorways and national routes. TII also produced Strategic Noise Maps for non national roads with more than 3 million vehicles per year on behalf of Limerick City and County Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspector's Report ABP-307200-20
    Inspector’s Report ABP-307200-20 Development An 18.1m free-standing telecommunications support structure Location Ballygibbon, Blarney, Co. Cork, Planning Authority Cork County Council Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 204192 Applicant(s) Shared Access Limited. Type of Application Permission Planning Authority Decision Grant Permission with conditions Type of Appeal Third Party Appellant(s) Iarnród Eireann. Observer(s) Transport Infrastructure Ireland TII. Date of Site Inspection 31st July 2020. Inspector Bríd Maxwell ABP-307200-20 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 12 1.0 Site Location and Description The appeal site 0.0064 hectares is located in the townland of Ballygibbon circa 3.3km to the north of Blarney town centre. The site is within an undulating landscape and lies between the Mallow Cork rail track to the east and the N20 road and River Martin to the west. The appeal site is located at the western end of an agricultural field adjacent to mature and semi mature trees which up to approximately 8m in height. Within approximately 100m the south are a dwelling and farm buildings. Access is from a cul de sac local road to the south. 2.0 Proposed Development 2.1 The proposal comprises a shared wireless broadband facility consisting of an 18.1m monopole supporting 6 no antennas, 9 RPUs and 2 no dishes for Eir, with provision for a second operator to co-locate on the structure. The site will be capable of accommodating 3G / 4G technologies. The monopole has an overall height of 18.1m. Application details outline that the existing Eir mast which is only 9.6m high to the south of the site will be decommissioned as it does not meet the coverage requirements of Eir in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Area Plan Chief Executive's
    Report to Members Under S.20(3)(k) of the Planning and Development Acts Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Area Plan Chief Executive’s Opinion and Recommendations on the Issues Raised by Submissions on the Proposed Amendments 16th June 2017 Document Verification Page 1 of 1 Job Title: Document Title: Report to Members Under S.20(3)(k) of the Planning and Development Acts Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Area Plan Chief Executive’s Opinion and Recommendations on the Issues Raised by Submissions on the Proposed Amendments 16th June 2017 Document Ref: Revision Date Filename: Report to Members June 2017 Version final Description: This report sets out the Chief Executive’s Opinion on the issues raised in Submissions to the Proposed Amendments to the Blarney Macroom Municipal District LAP Prepared Drawn Checked by Approved by by by Name 1.0 FG AF PM ML 2 Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Report to Members on Submissions to Area Plan Review Proposed Amendments This report focuses on the submissions and observations received from the public following publication of the proposed amendments to the Draft Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Area Plan. The draft plan sets out the planning framework for the development of the Municipal District. The report summarises the outcome of this consultation process which was carried out in line with Section 20(3) of the Planning & Development Acts and will inform the finalisation of the various amendments to the Draft Blarney Macroom Municipal District Local Area Plan. Appendix A of the report includes a list of the submissions received relevant to the Municipal District.
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Summary List Jan 2015
    March 2015 For further information contact Stephen Murray Lisa McGrane Dave Egan Daniel Carty Jones Lang LaSalle 10/11 Molesworth Street, Dublin 01 673 1600 www.jllie [email protected] Retail Agency JLL’s Retail Agency Department Kildare Village, Parkway If you have a requirement or Contents is comprised of the most Shopping Centre, Omni need advice in relaon to retail experienced and dedicated Shopping Cente, Balbriggan accommodaon or Introducon team operang in Dublin Town Centre, Barrow Valley development, why not give us Shopping Centres today. The team has been Retail Park, the Kyle Centre a call today on 01 6731600 in involved in all forms of retail Portlaoise to name but a few. relaon to Dublin (Northside) acvity from leasing, sales, rent Dublin (Southside) review, occupier acquisions Key occupiers on whose behalf and development advice. we act are detailed below and Dublin (North City Centre) include: ‐ Dublin (South City Centre) The strength of the team is Glossary of Property Terms evidenced by the number of Boots Superdry very successful and high profile schemes with which it has Tiger PC World been involved. These projects include regional development Curry’s such as Blanchardstown Town Schuh Centre, The Square Town McDonald’s Centre Tallaght, Airside Retail Specsavers amongst others. Park, St. Stephens Green Centre, Dun Laoghaire Shopping Centre, Crescent Shopping Centre Limerick, Stephen Murray Lisa McGrane David Egan Daniel Carty [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] dan‐ European Director Naonal Director Surveyor [email protected] Amongst others, Jones Lang LaSalle has represented the following retailers Shopping Centres Blanchardstown Omni Park St Stephen’s Green The Blanchardstown Centre is Ireland’s largest Omni Shopping and Leisure is North Dublin’s St Stephen’s Green Centre is laid out over Retail and Leisure desnaon and is the leading shopping desnaon anchored by three levels and designed around a glass number one ranked centre by CACI in the Tesco and Penneys and Omniplex Cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • N20 Cork-Limerick (Phase 2)
    Transport & Mobility Forum N/M20 Cork-Limerick Project Office Lissanalta House Dooradoyle Limerick V94 H5RR Via email to: [email protected] Transport and Mobility Forum, Cork www.transportandmobilityforum.com [email protected] c/o Cork Environmental Forum Bernadette Connolly Mount Carmel, Kilcolman Enniskeane, Co. Cork P47 C578 15th January 2021 PART 8 Public Consultation – Response N20 Cork-Limerick (Phase 2) Dear Sir/Madam, The Transport and Mobility Forum, Cork (TMF) is a representative group of organisations who have a common interest in sustainable travel *. The TMF fully supports sustainable modes of travel measures and policies. Sustainable and Active Travel helps reduce congestion on roads, improve air quality, supports a low carbon economy, reduces noise pollution and improves public health. The TMF welcomes the opportunity to feed into the public consultation process at this stage, the Phase 2 options selection process for the rail and road based options. We also thank Tara O’Leary and the team at SWECO for their information given to the TMF group in our monthly meeting of 1st December 2020. General We see the holistic, cross-modal approach of planning for both a rail based and road based option, along with local active travel improvements, as very positive, as it looks at integrated transport options for the Cork-Limerick corridor, instead of planning for the various transport modes in isolation. As the TMF is a Cork based group, we will primarily – but not only – look at the effects on the Cork end of the scheme in this submission. 1 Transport & Mobility Forum Road based Options: We welcome the fact that as the result of Phase 1 route selection, a large-scale planning of an entirely new road (N-road or motorway) for the entire length of the corridor was dropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Muskerry News Email: [email protected] Page 3 A
    VERSION NUMBER www.GoldenPages.ie incorporating North City *0005175094* FREE News Golden Pages Advert Proofs 2010 INTERNAL USE ONLY Content_ ID _________ 1325463 DGS 182312 March 2013 USKERRYwww.muskerrynews.biz EWSVol 11, Issue 4 JohnM O’Leary Autos TNEILC N yenwoD:EMAN15508703:ON gninaelC secivreS EUSSI 7:ETAD ceD 0102 Superior Servicing & Repairs carried out to all makes of cars, 4x4’s and light commercials The D2HC advertisement which includes your company name will appear under the classiÞcation(s) and directory MYLER INDUSTRIAL EST,, WEST VILLAGE, BALLINCOLLIG, CO. CORK. edition(s) listed below. Diagnostic Treat your car to Full mechanical checks available for a service at John services incl. all makes & models O'Leary Autos where brakes, clutches, from 1995 - 2009 personal service & suspension, Computerised print satisfaction is timing belts etc outs available guaranteed CLASSIFICATION________________ _______________KOOB/NOITIDE SECTION_________ For Booking contact John O’Leary @ 021 4870655 Mob: 087 2915551 Domino’sgninaelC & ecnanetniaM ecivreS Pizza0102 )20( kroC deifissalC yrotceriD delivering to Thank you! Blarney and Tower DOWNEY CLEANING & FLOOR SANDING Proof No: 1 To the 18,675 people we reached SPECIALISTS Call for Great Deals last week via our facebook page. Blarney Co Cork ............. (087) 237 2213 From( See Our Display Advertisement ) From Blarney call Tower call 021-4215555 021-4289090 THE GOLDEN PANDA Blarney Shopping Centre 4381877 / 4382677 4 course menu available all night, Floor Sanding Eat in our comfortable every night only €14.95! restaurant or take away 4 course menu still available only €18.50 Pressure Washing Mon, Wed, Thurs, Fri, Sat 4.30pm - 11.15pm Sunday lunch 12.30 - 3.30pm Sunday 1pm - 11pm 3 courses only €12 MOTOR SERVICES M.C.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Regeneration for Southill/Ballinacurra Weston LIMERICK REGENERATION 5.2
    Physical Regeneration for Southill/Ballinacurra Weston LIMERICK REGENERATION 5.2. Physical Plan for Southill/Ballinacurra Weston Southern Ring Road O’Malley Park Keyes Park Galvone Industrial Estate Carew Park/Kincora Park LEDP Maldron Hotel Regeneration Physical Roxboro Shopping Centre 115 Ballinacurra Weston 116 Physical Regeneration for Southill/Ballinacurra Weston LIMERICK REGENERATION 5.2. Physical Plan for Southill/Ballinacurra Weston 5.2.1 Introduction Chapter Two of this document outlines the Strategic Context in which these plans must be consistent with as the regeneration moves forward. The Physical Plan is at this stage indicative only and very much a ‘work in progress’. The details of the various projects proposed will need to be flexible and in a position to respond to the changes that occur within the fluid environment which they operate. From a land-use and planning perspective, matters are changing on a regular basis, for example the Regional Planning Guidelines are due for review shortly as are some of the relevant local authority development plans. In addition the changing economic and social circumstances of the country may have some implications for population growth and development options which may in turn impact on the approaches taken with regard to regional development. Therefore as we move forward this Regeneration Plan must continue to complement the strategies and different elements of the various national, regional and local levels as outlined in table 1 (page 19). Based on the social and economic context and issues outlined in chapters 3 and 4, it is clear that the Southill and Ballinacurra Weston neighbourhoods need to be comprehensively redeveloped.
    [Show full text]
  • Cork Line Level Crossings Consultation Report Iarnród Éireann
    Cork Line Level Crossings Consultation Report Iarnród Éireann June 2020 Consu lta tion Rep or t Iarn ród Éirea nn Consultation Report Cork Line Level Crossings Project No: 32111000 Document Title: Consultation Report Document No.: CLLC Public Consultation Report Revision: 1 Document Status: Final Date: June 2020 Client Name: Iarnród Éireann Client No: TBD Project Manager: Alex Bradley Author: Lisa Halpin File Name: CLLC Public Consultation Report Artola House, 3rd & 4th Floors, 91 Victoria Street www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2019 Please select a legal entity from the Change Document Details option on the Jacobs ribbon. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved 0 31/03/2020 CLLC Public Consultation Report Lisa Halpin Jane Ciara AB Hennessy Murphy 1 02/06/2020 CLLC Public Consultation Report Lisa Halpin Jane Ciara AB Hennessy Murphy Document No. i Consultation Report Contents Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Retail Summary List Jan 2015
    July 2015 For further information contact Stephen Murray Lisa McGrane Dave Egan Daniel Carty Jones Lang LaSalle Styne House, Upper Hatch Street, Dublin 2 01 673 1600 www.jllie [email protected] Retail Agency JLL’s Retail Agency Department Kildare Village, Parkway If you have a requirement or Contents is comprised of the most Shopping Centre, Omni need advice in relaon to retail experienced and dedicated Shopping Cente, Balbriggan accommodaon or Introducon team operang in Dublin Town Centre, Barrow Valley development, why not give us Shopping Centres today. The team has been Retail Park, the Kyle Centre a call today on 01 6731600 in involved in all forms of retail Portlaoise to name but a few. relaon to Dublin (Northside) acvity from leasing, sales, rent Dublin (Southside) review, occupier acquisions Key occupiers on whose behalf and development advice. we act are detailed below and Dublin (North City Centre) include: ‐ Dublin (South City Centre) The strength of the team is Glossary of Property Terms evidenced by the number of Boots Superdry very successful and high profile schemes with which it has Tiger PC World been involved. These projects include regional development Curry’s such as Blanchardstown Town Schuh Centre, The Square Town McDonald’s Centre Tallaght, Airside Retail Specsavers amongst others. Park, St. Stephens Green Centre, Dun Laoghaire Shopping Centre, Crescent Shopping Centre Limerick, Stephen Murray Lisa McGrane David Egan Daniel Carty [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] dan‐ European Director Naonal Director Surveyor [email protected] Amongst others, Jones Lang LaSalle has represented the following retailers Shopping Centres Blanchardstown Omni Park St Stephen’s Green The Blanchardstown Centre is Ireland’s largest Omni Shopping and Leisure is North Dublin’s St Stephen’s Green Centre is laid out over Retail and Leisure desnaon and is the leading shopping desnaon anchored by three levels and designed around a glass number one ranked centre by CACI in the Tesco and Penneys and Omniplex Cinema.
    [Show full text]