DOCSLIB.ORG

Cork Line Level Crossings Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Iarnród Éireann

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cork Line Level Crossings Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Iarnród Éireann Cork Line Level Crossings Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Iarnród Éireann March 2021 Document Title Client Name Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Cork Line Level Crossings Project No: 3211100 Document Title: Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Document No.: 3 Revision: A05 Date: March 2021 Client Name: Iarnród Éireann Project Manager: Alex Bradley Author: Various Jacobs U.K. Limited Artola House 3rd & 4th Floors 91 Victoria Street Belfast BT1 4PN T +44 (0)28 9032 4452 F +44 (0)28 9033 0713 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2020. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This document has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Jacobs’ client, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this document by any third party. Document history and status Revision Date Description Author Checked Reviewed Approved A01 December 2019 Draft for Comment SJ HC RM AB A02 May 2020 Amendments following Client Review Various HC RM AB A03 October 2020 Design Updates Various HC RM AB A04 December 2020 For Legal Comment Various RM RM AB A05 March 2021 For Issue to An Bord Pleanála Various RM RM AB i Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description Table of Acronyms .............................................................................................................................................................. iv 3. Project Description ................................................................................................................................................ 1 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 3.1.1 Site Location(s) for the Proposed Project ..................................................................................................................... 1 3.2 Current Railway Line Usage ................................................................................................................................................ 2 3.2.1 First Trains ................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 3.2.2 Last Trains .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.3 Existing Conditions of Level Crossings ........................................................................................................................... 3 3.3.1 Crossing Times ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3.2 Existing Structures and Maintenance.............................................................................................................................. 3 3.4 Proposed Solutions - Infrastructural Elements ........................................................................................................... 8 3.4.1 Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3.4.2 Ancillary Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.4.3 XC187 Fantstown ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3.4.4 XC201 Thomastown ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 3.4.5 XC209 Ballyhay .................................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.4.6 XC211 Newtown ................................................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4.7 XC212 Ballycoskery ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 3.4.8 XC215 Shinanagh ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 3.4.9 XC219 Buttevant .................................................................................................................................................................. 20 3.5 Ancillary Infrastructure ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.5.1 Traffic Signs, Road Markings and Lighting ................................................................................................................ 23 3.5.2 Non-Motorised User (NMU) Provision ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.5.3 Fencing and Environmental Barriers ............................................................................................................................ 24 3.6 Construction Phase ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.6.1 Construction Hours ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.6.2 Construction Programme ................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.6.3 Lifting Operations ................................................................................................................................................................ 28 3.6.4 Craneage ................................................................................................................................................................................. 28 3.6.5 Buried services and overhead services ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.6.6 Rail Closures........................................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.6.7 Earthworks and Construction Traffic ............................................................................................................................ 29 3.6.8 Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) ...................................................................................................... 29 3.6.9 Abnormal Loads and Construction Routes ................................................................................................................ 31 3.6.10 Land Acquisition and Demolition .................................................................................................................................. 31 3.6.11 Construction Compounds and Working Areas ......................................................................................................... 32 3.6.12 Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) ..................................................................................... 32 3.7 Proportionality of Scheme ............................................................................................................................................... 33 ii Volume 2, Chapter 3: Project Description 3.7.1 Principles of Design for Bridges and Alignments .................................................................................................... 35 3.7.2 Proposed Design at Each Location................................................................................................................................ 35 3.7.3 Traffic Counts Comparison ............................................................................................................................................... 38 3.7.4 Summary of Proportionality ............................................................................................................................................ 40 3.8 References .............................................................................................................................................................................. 41 Table 3. 1: Existing Condition of Level Crossings which are the subject of the proposed Project ......................... 1 Table 3.2: Proposed Solutions at each Crossing ........................................................................................................................ 8 Table 3.3: Construction Phasing and Indicative Programme for XC201
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Kirby Collection Catalogue Irish College Rome
    Archival list The Kirby Collection Catalogue Irish College Rome ARCHIVES PONTIFICAL IRISH COLLEGE, ROME Code Date Description and Extent KIR/1836-1861/ 9 15 September Holograph letter from J.P. Cooke, Waterford, to Kirby: 1837 condolences on father’s death. 4pp 10 20 September Holograph letter from M.V. Ryan, Abbot, Mt. Melleray, to 1837 Kirby: introducing two “members of a Religious body in the Queen’s County and other parts of Ireland” and asking to have them introduced to the General of Cists [Cistercians]. 3pp 11 22 September Holograph letter from William Carroll, Waterford, to Kirby: 1837 consulting Dr. Kirby on vocation. 4pp 12 22 September Holograph letter from [J.] Dowley, St. John’s College, 1837 Waterford, to Kirby: applying for faculties. 4pp 13 10 October Holograph letter from Ellen Byrne, 3 Avoca Place to Kirby: 1837 thanks for money. Home News. 4pp 14 27 November Holograph letter from William Kirby [brother], Limerick, to 1837 Kirby: Dr. Kirby recovered from serious illness. Nephew got habit in Mt. Melleray. General home news and politics. 4pp 15 1 February Two holograph letters. First letter from Denis Placid Byrne, 1838 [nephew], Mt. Melleray, to Kirby: details about entering Mt. Melleray Abbey which is scarcely half finished as yet. Second letter from Ellen Byrne [sister] with home news. 4pp 16 28 May Holograph letter from Rosanna O’Ferrall, Naples, to Kirby: 1838 seen, heard and noted around Naples 6pp 17 14 August Holograph letter from Louisa O’Ferrall, Naples, to Kirby: 1838 touring in Sicily. 4pp 2 Archives Irish College Rome Code Date Description and Extent KIR/1836-1861/ 18 10 September Holograph letter from William Carroll, Waterford, to Kirby: 1838 discussing his vocation to become a Trappist.
    [Show full text]
  • Matakana Link Road Public Consultation Feedback
    Matakana link road Public Consultation Feedback Report – July 2017 AT.govt.nz Contents 1. Background ................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Project Development ..................................................................................... 5 1.2 Public Consultation ....................................................................................... 6 2. Feedback Received ..................................................................................................... 8 Question 1 – Which option do you prefer? ................................................................... 9 Question 4 – How would you use the road? .................................................................. 9 Questions 2, 3, 5 & 6 – Issues and Constraints (Key themes identified) ................... 10 3. Next Steps ................................................................................................................. 22 4. Conclusion................................................................................................................. 22 5. Appendix A. Consultation feedback ........................................................................ 23 2 Executive Summary In April 2017, Auckland Transport (AT) sought public feedback on the four short-listed options for the proposed Matakana Link Road. Feedback on the short-listed options was invited from 26 April to 20 May 2017. Submitters were asked to identify their preferred route option (see map
    [Show full text]
  • Road Network Selection for Small-Scale Maps Using an Improved Centrality-Based Algorithm
    JOURNAL OF SPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE Number 9 (2014), pp. 71–99 doi:10.5311/JOSIS.2014.9.166 RESEARCH ARTICLE Road network selection for small-scale maps using an improved centrality-based algorithm Roy Weiss and Robert Weibel Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Received: January 31, 2014; returned: March 13, 2014; revised: July 29, 2014; accepted: August 18, 2014. Abstract: The road network is one of the key feature classes in topographic maps and databases. In the task of deriving road networks for products at smaller scales, road net- work selection forms a prerequisite for all other generalization operators, and is thus a fun- damental operation in the overall process of topographic map and database production. The objective of this work was to develop an algorithm for automated road network selec- tion from a large-scale (1:10,000) to a small-scale database (1:200,000). The project was pur- sued in collaboration with swisstopo, the national mapping agency of Switzerland, with generic mapping requirements in mind. Preliminary experiments suggested that a selec- tion algorithm based on betweenness centrality performed best for this purpose, yet also exposed problems. The main contribution of this paper thus consists of four extensions that address deficiencies of the basic centrality-based algorithm and lead to a significant improvement of the results. The first two extensions improve the formation of strokes concatenating the road segments, which is crucial since strokes provide the foundation upon which the network centrality measure is computed. Thus, the first extension en- sures that roundabouts are detected and collapsed, thus avoiding interruptions of strokes by roundabouts, while the second introduces additional semantics in the process of stroke formation, allowing longer and more plausible strokes to built.
    [Show full text]
  • 0615 Richard Logue
    Future-proofing Ireland A response to the National Planning Framework Richard Logue Introduction The Central Statistics Office predicts that the State’s population will increase by 1.7 million over the next 30 years. Unless the State is proactive and plans ahead for this significant increase in population we will be faced with even more unbalanced development than we already have. John Moran, the former Secretary of the Department of Finance has proposed that a counterweight to Dublin be established in the West in order to deal with the issue of population expansion. This idea should be given very serious consideration. At present nearly all significant development in the State is focussed on the Greater Dublin Area. We have a stark choice facing us for the future of Ireland; we can either allow Dublin to grow out of control or we can re-invent some of the most deprived and remote parts of Ireland for a brighter future in an uncertain world. Richard Logue London, March 2017. Biographical note I started working for London Underground in 1989 and since then have worked on a variety of major rail projects including the Jubilee Line extension, the Thameslink Programme and more recently for Network Rail’s Anglia route. My projects include the Crossrail project, Step Free Access at Stations, and the new Lea Bridge and Cambridge North stations. I am from Quigley’s Point in County Donegal and have lived in the UK since 1985. Developing the West to its potential The proposals in this document are a radical re-think of development in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • 04 Mallow Town Park Outline Construction
    Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Client: Cork County Council Date: 22 May 2021 DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET 6615_RP_CEMP01_Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Project No. 6615 Client: Cork County Council Project Name: Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Report Name: Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Document No. RP_CEMP01 Issue No. 01 Date: 22/05/2021 This document has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Status Date Prepared Checked 01 Planning 22 May 2021 DB TB Proposed Improvement Works at Mallow Town Park, Mallow, Co. Cork Outline Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 4 2 Regulatory and Policy Framework ....................................................... 6 2.1 Legislation .................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Policy & Guidance ....................................................................................... 6 3 Description of the Proposed Development .......................................... 7 4 Construction Programme and Phasing ................................................ 8 4.1 Restrictions on Working Hours ................................................................... 8 5 General Site Management ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Landscape Names
    Irish Landscape Names Preface to 2010 edition Stradbally on its own denotes a parish and village); there is usually no equivalent word in the Irish form, such as sliabh or cnoc; and the Ordnance The following document is extracted from the database used to prepare the list Survey forms have not gained currency locally or amongst hill-walkers. The of peaks included on the „Summits‟ section and other sections at second group of exceptions concerns hills for which there was substantial www.mountainviews.ie The document comprises the name data and key evidence from alternative authoritative sources for a name other than the one geographical data for each peak listed on the website as of May 2010, with shown on OS maps, e.g. Croaghonagh / Cruach Eoghanach in Co. Donegal, some minor changes and omissions. The geographical data on the website is marked on the Discovery map as Barnesmore, or Slievetrue in Co. Antrim, more comprehensive. marked on the Discoverer map as Carn Hill. In some of these cases, the evidence for overriding the map forms comes from other Ordnance Survey The data was collated over a number of years by a team of volunteer sources, such as the Ordnance Survey Memoirs. It should be emphasised that contributors to the website. The list in use started with the 2000ft list of Rev. these exceptions represent only a very small percentage of the names listed Vandeleur (1950s), the 600m list based on this by Joss Lynam (1970s) and the and that the forms used by the Placenames Branch and/or OSI/OSNI are 400 and 500m lists of Michael Dewey and Myrddyn Phillips.
    [Show full text]
  • 5/1 Chapter 5 the SOUTH-WEST Counties East, South and North-West CORK -- KERRY -- West LIMERICK East CORK Cobh -- Spike Island T
    Chapter 5 THE SOUTH-WEST counties East, south and north-west CORK -- KERRY -- west LIMERICK East CORK Cobh -- Spike Island Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth century, visitors to Ireland from Britain and the Continent were appalled at the poverty of its people, and wondered at this because so much of the land was fertile. There were many reasons for the destitution, so many that Frank O'Connor neatly sidesteps them -- but he is in little doubt of the main reason: ignorance of the true condition of Ireland, on the part of its distant government, because of the difficulties involved in visiting it [1] : Books about a country usually begin with its history. Books about Ireland which do this tend to remain unread. The misunderstandings are too many... Ultimately, perhaps, all the misunderstandings can be traced to sixty miles of salt water which stretches between Britain and Ireland. O'Connor was writing in the 1940s. Mr & Mrs Hall begin their vast, chatty, obsequious (to the English reader) but well-intentioned three-volume Ireland , a hundred years earlier (1841), with a long description of the purgatory of a pre-steam crossing to Cork. They agree with O'Connor [2] : It was not alone the miserable paucity of accommodation and utter indifference to the comfort of the passengers, that made the voyage an intolerable evil. Though it usually occupied but three or four days, frequently as many weeks were expended in making it. It was once our lot to pass a month between the ports of Bristol and Cork; putting back, every now and then, to the wretched village of Pill, and not daring to leave it even for an hour, lest the wind should change and the packet weigh anchor..
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Crokers Nick Reddan
    © Nick Reddan Last updated 2 May 2021 The Irish CROKERs Nick Reddan 1 © Nick Reddan Last updated 2 May 2021 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................ 4 Origin and very early records ................................................................................................ 4 Acknowledgments.................................................................................................................. 5 Note ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Origin ......................................................................................................................................... 6 The Settlers ................................................................................................................................ 9 The first wave ........................................................................................................................ 9 The main group .................................................................................................................... 10 Lisnabrin and Nadrid ............................................................................................................... 15 Dublin I ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cork City and County Archives Index to Listed Collections with Scope and Content
    Cork City and County Archives Index to Listed Collections with Scope and Content A State of the Ref. IE CCCA/U73 Date: 1769 Level: item Extent: 32pp Diocese of Cloyne Scope and Content: Photocopy of MS. volume 'A State of The Diocese of Cloyne With Respect to the Several Parishes... Containing The State of the Churches, the Glebes, Patrons, Proxies, Taxations in the King's Books, Crown – Rents, and the Names of the Incumbents, with Other Observations, In Alphabetical Order, Carefully collected from the Visitation Books and other Records preserved in the Registry of that See'. Gives ecclesiastical details of the parishes of Cloyne; lists the state of each parish and outlines the duties of the Dean. (Copy of PRONI T2862/5) Account Book of Ref. IE CCCA/SM667 Date: c.1865 - 1875 Level: fonds Extent: 150pp Richard Lee Scope and Content: Account ledger of Richard Lee, Architect and Builder, 7 North Street, Skibbereen. Included are clients’ names, and entries for materials, labourers’ wages, and fees. Pages 78 to 117 have been torn out. Clients include the Munster Bank, Provincial Bank, F McCarthy Brewery, Skibbereen Town Commissioners, Skibbereen Board of Guardians, Schull Board of Guardians, George Vickery, Banduff Quarry, Rev MFS Townsend of Castletownsend, Mrs Townsend of Caheragh, Richard Beamish, Captain A Morgan, Abbeystrewry Church, Beecher Arms Hotel, and others. One client account is called ‘Masonic Hall’ (pp30-31) [Lee was a member of Masonic Lodge no.15 and was responsible for the building of the lodge room]. On page 31 is written a note regarding the New Testament. Account Book of Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • The Putney Road Link Road Scheme
    The Putney Road Link Road Scheme: Why the Council should think again about building this link road Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Is Putney Road suitable for use as a link road? 1 3. Is the Putney Road scheme linked to an Evesham Road scheme? 2 4. Does the Putney Road scheme meet its objectives? 2 5. What are the outcomes from the Putney Road scheme? 3 6. Are the Putney Road scheme outcomes positive? 4 7. Overall conclusions about outcomes and objectives 5 8. Will it reduce rat-running? 6 9. How good is the traffic modelling? 7 10. Testing the traffic model 8 11. Count point accuracy 8 12. Conclusions about the scheme and concluding comments 11 13. The conduct of the bid and the consultation 12 0 The Putney Road Link Road Scheme: Why the Council should think again about building this link road 1. Introduction The Putney Road Link Road scheme will create a new junction where Putney Road West meets Aylestone Road/Saffron Lane, and create a link road running through to Welford Road/Victoria Park Road. Although it is intended to create a new local access to the business area, the main purpose of the scheme is the creation of the link road which at this stage will extend to the A6 London Road through Victoria Park Road. Although the council claims this scheme is not connected with a further scheme, linking Aylestone Road to Narborough Road through Evesham Road, it is self-evident that it is, and the council says this in the bid for the funding for this first stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkside Development New Link Road Access to the M6 Motorway Proposal
    Richard Ward PINS Reference 3253194; 3253230; and 3253232 Parkside Development New Link Road Access to the M6 Motorway Proposal Page 1 of 20 June 2020 Current Link Road proposal as shown in the Drainage Plan Page 2 of 20 The Current Proposal for the Parkside Link Road by not being a dedicated direct link to the M6 motorway, the Commercial Vehicle Traffic that will be generated by the proposed development(s) in total will impact on the local roads from all directions as measures to prevent are impossible to manage. The following plan of road access to the proposed Parkside development show the Commercial Vehicle Traffic impact on the Local Roads. Where the utilisation of the Motorway M6 junction 22 will be little used with respect to the access to the proposed development from the local roads. The Access was not solved by the previous Parkside Proposals by the developers: 1996 British Coal/Morrisons; 2000+ RailTrack; 2004-2009 Astral Developments; and 2009-2012 Prologis. To whom all had withdrawn due to not being able to solve the Traffic situation, over and above the reason for the development for the need for jobs which has become secondary and not a main issue considering the Parkside proposals having been an issue since 1993 to 2018, (ie 25 years). So the need for jobs is still not the issue the traffic impact still is the issue purely due to the urban location surrounded by a major road infrastructure. It is this that is the problem, due to heavily industrialising an area that the surrounding locality can not cope with the proposed situation – traffic wise.
    [Show full text]
  • DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS
    Rural Road Link Design DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS About TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is responsible for managing and improving the country’s national road and light rail networks. About TII Publications TII maintains an online suite of technical publications, which is managed through the TII Publications website. The contents of TII Publications is clearly split into ‘Standards’ and ‘Technical’ documentation. All documentation for implementation on TII schemes is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Standards), and all other documentation within the system is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Technical). Document Attributes Each document within TII Publications has a range of attributes associated with it, which allows for efficient access and retrieval of the document from the website. These attributes are also contained on the inside cover of each current document, for reference. TII Publication Title Rural Road Link Design TII Publication Number DN-GEO-03031 Activity Design (DN) Document Set Standards Stream Geometry (GEO) Publication Date June 2017 Document 03031 Historical NRA TD 9 Number Reference TII Publications Website This document is part of the TII publications system all of which is available free of charge at http://www.tiipublications.ie. For more information on the TII Publications system or to access further TII Publications documentation, please refer to the TII Publications website. TII Authorisation and Contact Details This document
    [Show full text]