Albeit in an Extinct Bird!) - by Rick and Elis Simpson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2. -
The Impact of Predation by Introduced Mammals on Endemic Shorebirds in New Zealand: a Conservation Perspective
Biological Conservation 99 (2001) 47±64 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon The impact of predation by introduced mammals on endemic shorebirds in New Zealand: a conservation perspective John E. Dowding a,*, Elaine C. Murphy b aPO Box 36-274, Merivale, Christchurch 8030, New Zealand bScience and Research Unit, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 4715, Christchurch, New Zealand Abstract The avifauna of New Zealand has been severely depleted since human colonisation and currently contains a disproportionately high number of threatened species. Of the 23 threatened shorebird species worldwide, six are endemic to New Zealand. We review the status of New Zealand's endemic shorebirds and examine the impact on them of various threats, particularly predation by introduced mammals. The conservation status of the 10 extant species (three oystercatchers, one stilt, four plovers and two snipe) is outlined and the factors that predisposed them to predation by introduced mammals are summarised. Individual species accounts are presented, including data on population trends, known or suspected impacts of predation, identi®cation of important predator species, other threats, and conservation measures currently in place or required. One species and two subspecies are extinct, three species are con®ned to predator-free islands and another is found only on the Chatham Islands group. Six survive on the mainland but three have declined to varying degrees and are assigned threatened status by Collar et al. (1994). Only one plover and two oystercatchers are still relatively numerous and/or widespread. Rats, cats and mustelids have had the greatest overall impacts. Conservation measures in place to mitigate the eects of introduced predators include the formulation of recovery plans, predator control around breeding areas, captive breeding and rearing programmes and the founding of new populations by translocation. -
La Brea and Beyond: the Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas
La Brea and Beyond: The Paleontology of Asphalt-Preserved Biotas Edited by John M. Harris Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Science Series 42 September 15, 2015 Cover Illustration: Pit 91 in 1915 An asphaltic bone mass in Pit 91 was discovered and exposed by the Los Angeles County Museum of History, Science and Art in the summer of 1915. The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History resumed excavation at this site in 1969. Retrieval of the “microfossils” from the asphaltic matrix has yielded a wealth of insect, mollusk, and plant remains, more than doubling the number of species recovered by earlier excavations. Today, the current excavation site is 900 square feet in extent, yielding fossils that range in age from about 15,000 to about 42,000 radiocarbon years. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Archives, RLB 347. LA BREA AND BEYOND: THE PALEONTOLOGY OF ASPHALT-PRESERVED BIOTAS Edited By John M. Harris NO. 42 SCIENCE SERIES NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Luis M. Chiappe, Vice President for Research and Collections John M. Harris, Committee Chairman Joel W. Martin Gregory Pauly Christine Thacker Xiaoming Wang K. Victoria Brown, Managing Editor Go Online to www.nhm.org/scholarlypublications for open access to volumes of Science Series and Contributions in Science. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Los Angeles, California 90007 ISSN 1-891276-27-1 Published on September 15, 2015 Printed at Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, Kansas PREFACE Rancho La Brea was a Mexican land grant Basin during the Late Pleistocene—sagebrush located to the west of El Pueblo de Nuestra scrub dotted with groves of oak and juniper with Sen˜ora la Reina de los A´ ngeles del Rı´ode riparian woodland along the major stream courses Porciu´ncula, now better known as downtown and with chaparral vegetation on the surrounding Los Angeles. -
A First Documented Brazilian Record of Least Seedsnipe Thinocorus Rumicivorus Eschscholtz, 1829 (Thinocoridae)
Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia, 20(4), 455-457 Nota/SHort-CommUNIcatIon Dezembro de 2012 / December 2012 A first documented Brazilian record of Least Seedsnipe Thinocorus rumicivorus Eschscholtz, 1829 (Thinocoridae) Felipe Castro1, João Castro1, Aluisio Ramos Ferreira2, Marco Aurélio Crozariol3,6 and Alexander Charles Lees4,5 1 Rua Tainha, 345, Bairro Sítio Ressaca, Ubatuba, SP. CEP: 11680-000. Brazil. 2 Rua Joaquim do Prado, 413, Cruzeiro, SP. CEP: 12701-370. Brazil. 3 Clube de Observadores de Aves do Vale do Paraíba Paulista – COAVAP; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia. Museu Nacional/UFRJ, Departamento de Vertebrados, Setor de Ornitologia, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ. CEP: 20940-040. Brazil. 4 Coordenação de Zoologia, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, CP 399, Belém, Pará, Brazil. 5 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. 6 Corresponding author: [email protected] Received on 25 July 2012. Accepted on 23 August 2012. ABSTRACT: Herein we present the first documented record of the Least Seedsnipe Thinocorus rumicivorus (Eschscholtz, 1829) for Brazil. On the 21 April 2012 a juvenile T. rumicivorus was photographed and sound-recorded by birdwatchers on the beach at Ubatumirim in the municipality of Ubatuba, on the northern São Paulo state coast. This is the first documented record of any seedsnipe (Thinocoridae) for Brazil. Its behaviour and the circumstances and potential drivers of its vagration are discussed. KEY-WORDS: birdwatching; Eragrostis; Thinocorus; vagrancy. At mid-morning on 21 April 2012, F. C., J. C. and Figure 1a). The bird only flew on rare occasions when A. R. F. were birdwatching on the beach at Ubatumirim totally encircled by the watching observers or when (23°19’53.53”S; 44°54’34.89”W) in the municipality of approached rapidly by locals on foot or on bicycles. -
Limosa Haemastica (Linnaeus, 1758): First Record from South Istributio
ISSN 1809-127X (online edition) © 2010 Check List and Authors Chec List Open Access | Freely available at www.checklist.org.br Journal of species lists and distribution N Aves, Charadriiformes, Scolopacidae, Limosa haemastica (Linnaeus, 1758): First record from South ISTRIBUTIO D Shetland Islands and Antarctic Peninsula, Antarctica 1,2* 1 1 1, 2 3 RAPHIC Mariana A. Juáres , Marcela M. Libertelli , M. Mercedes Santos , Javier Negrete , Martín Gray , G 1 1,2 4 1 1 EO Matías Baviera , M. Eugenia Moreira , Giovanna Donini , Alejandro Carlini and Néstor R. Coria G N O 1 Instituto Antártico Argentino, Departmento Biología, Aves, Cerrito 1248, C1010AAZ. Buenos Aires, Argentina. OTES 3 Administración de Parques Nacionales (APN). Avenida Santa Fe 690, C1059ABN. Buenos Aires, Argentina. N 4 2 JarConsejodín Zoológico Nacional de de Buenos Investigaciones Aires. República Científicas de lay TécnicasIndia 2900, (CONICET). C1425FCF. Rivadavia Buenos Aires,1917, Argentina.C1033AAJ. Buenos Aires, Argentina. * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We report herein the southernmost record of the Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemastica), at two localities in the Antarctic: Esperanza/Hope Bay (January 2005) and 25 de Mayo/King George Island (October 2008). On both occasions a pair of specimens with winter plumage was observed. The Hudsonian Godwit Limosa haemastica (Linnaeus tide and each time birds were feeding in the intertidal 1758) is a neartic migratory species that breeds in Alaska zone. These individuals showed the winter plumage and Canada during summer and spends its non-breeding pattern: dark reddish chest and white ventral region, black period in the southernmost regions of South America primaries and tail feathers, a long upturned bill pink at during the boreal winter. -
The Wandererthe Wanderer
The WandererThe Wanderer This occasional newsletter covers news, and information about Plains-wanderer Winter 2016 Volume 1 Issue 2 conservation and management. Past newsletters are available via a link on the Trust for Nature website http://www.trustfornature.org.au/our-conservation-work/priority-species/plains- Inside this issue: wanderer/ and on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/TrustforNatureVictoria Thanks to all of the contributors to this issue, and particularly for the review of Queensland records by Plains-wanderer 1 Maree Rich and colleagues. If you have articles that may be of interest to others, please send copies to the Recovery Plan adopted editor David Baker-Gabb at [email protected] Plains-wanderer on 1 NSW Iconic Species Plains-wanderer Recovery Plan The Birds and the Peas list adopted Grasslands Field Day Grasslands Field Day 1 On 28 June 2016 the National Recovery Plan Join the Northern Plains Conservation Plains-wanderers in 2 for the Plains-wanderer came into effect under Management Network, Trust for Nature Qld; a summary of the the EPBC Act. The final recovery plan can and Dr David Baker-Gabb in launching last 30 years be accessed at: the Managing Native Grasslands for Plains- Plains-wanderer 6 http://www.environment.gov.au/biodivers wanderers Field Guide. monitoring results for ity/threatened/recovery-plans/plains- Hear from Dr Dan Harley about the Zoos Victoria 2015-2016 wanderer-2016 Victoria Fighting Extinction programme Plains-wanderer 7 and their plan to start captive-breeding monitoring and surveys Plains-wanderers in 2017. Plains-wanderer on NSW Iconic from NSW 2014-16 Walk with grassland ecologist Paul Species list Boolcoomatta Reserve, 8 Foreman and learn how to survey for South Australia threatened grassland plants. -
SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does Not Include Alcidae
SHOREBIRDS (Charadriiformes*) CARE MANUAL *Does not include Alcidae CREATED BY AZA CHARADRIIFORMES TAXON ADVISORY GROUP IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA ANIMAL WELFARE COMMITTEE Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Charadriiformes Taxon Advisory Group. (2014). Shorebirds (Charadriiformes) Care Manual. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Original Completion Date: October 2013 Authors and Significant Contributors: Aimee Greenebaum: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Vice Chair, Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Alex Waier: Milwaukee County Zoo, USA Carol Hendrickson: Birmingham Zoo, USA Cindy Pinger: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Chair, Birmingham Zoo, USA CJ McCarty: Oregon Coast Aquarium, USA Heidi Cline: Alaska SeaLife Center, USA Jamie Ries: Central Park Zoo, USA Joe Barkowski: Sedgwick County Zoo, USA Kim Wanders: Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA Mary Carlson: Charadriiformes Program Advisor, Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Perry: Seattle Aquarium, USA Sara Crook-Martin: Buttonwood Park Zoo, USA Shana R. Lavin, Ph.D.,Wildlife Nutrition Fellow University of Florida, Dept. of Animal Sciences , Walt Disney World Animal Programs Dr. Stephanie McCain: AZA Charadriiformes TAG Veterinarian Advisor, DVM, Birmingham Zoo, USA Phil King: Assiniboine Park Zoo, Canada Reviewers: Dr. Mike Murray (Monterey Bay Aquarium, USA) John C. Anderson (Seattle Aquarium volunteer) Kristina Neuman (Point Blue Conservation Science) Sarah Saunders (Conservation Biology Graduate Program,University of Minnesota) AZA Staff Editors: Maya Seaman, MS, Animal Care Manual Editing Consultant Candice Dorsey, PhD, Director of Animal Programs Debborah Luke, PhD, Vice President, Conservation & Science Cover Photo Credits: Jeff Pribble Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management. -
Full Article
Notornis, 2005, Vol. 52: 163-165 163 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2005 SHORT NOTE Snares Island snipe had higher wing loadings and reduced flying ability compared to Chatham Island snipe (C. pusilla), and argued that Snares Island Evidence for ‘hakawai’ snipe had progressed further towards flightlessness than other Coenocorypha snipe, apparently losing aerial displaying by Snares the hakawai aerial display in the process. However, Island snipe (Coenocorypha I here present evidence that Snares Island snipe have retained the hakawai display as part of their aucklandica huegeli) behavioural repertoire. During 10-16 April 2005 I participated in a COLIN M. MISKELLY transfer of 30 Snares Island snipe from North East Wellington Conservancy, Department of Island to Putauhinu Island, a 141 ha muttonbird Conservation, P.O. Box 5086, Wellington, New island off the south-west coast of Stewart Island. Zealand. [email protected] The translocation was undertaken towards the end of the snipe breeding season. A few birds were The hakawai was a legendary bird of the still caring for dependent young (and one female Muttonbird (Titi) Islands around Stewart Island. captured on 12 April laid an egg in an aviary by Unseen, and considered by many to be invisible, its the following day), but most adults were in post- eerie call was heard only at night, and was greatly breeding (pre-basic) moult. While handling 18 feared by many muttonbirders (Miskelly 1987). adult male snipe during 11-13 April (of which four The hakawai was last heard on Taukihepa (Big South were caring for chicks), I found two of the “post- Cape Island) in the early 1960s, about the time that breeding” males had the broken tail feather tips ship rats (Rattus rattus) invaded the island. -
Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand
Notornis, 2001, Vol. 48: 1-40 0029-4470 0 The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2001 Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand COLIN M. MISKELLY Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand Current address: Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, PO. Box 5086, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water &Atmospheric Research, PO. Box 8602, Christchurch ALAN J.D. TENNYSON Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO. Box 467, Wellington R. PAUL SCOFIELD Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO. Box 56, Dunedin Abstract Bird records from the Snares Islands between Dec 1982 and Oct 2000 are summarised. Population estimates and distributions are given for the 29 breeding species. Bird species recorded breeding on the Snares Is for the first time since 1982 were southern black-browed albatross (Diomedea melanophtys), Chatham Island albatross (D. eremita), mallard (Anasplatyrhynchos), southern black-backed gull (Larus dominicanus), fantail (Rhipidura Juliginosa), and starling (Sturnus vulyaris). Fantails are now abundant on the Snares Is. Published work on the breeding chronology and breeding success of 8 intensively studied species is summarised, and new information on breeding ecology is presented for all breeding species. Sighting of 70 non-breeding and vagrant species are summarised;34 of these were new records from the Snares Is since 1980. The total bird list for the Snares Is is now 99 species, with a further 8 species reported from boats offshore. Miskelly, C.M.; Sagar, EM.; Tennyson, A.J.D;Scofield, R.l? 2001. Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand.Notornis 48(1): 1-40. -
Conserving Shorebirds in Human-Dominated Landscapes Micha Victoria Jackson Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies
Conserving shorebirds in human-dominated landscapes Micha Victoria Jackson Bachelor of Arts, Environmental Studies ORCID: 0000-0002-5150-2962 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2020 School of Biological Sciences i Abstract Wetlands support biodiversity and provide critical ecosystem services but have been severely impacted by human activity. Shorebirds are a diverse group of waterbirds that usually forage in shallow water, making them highly dependent on wetlands. Coastal shorebirds are increasingly threatened in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway where coastlines are heavily developed and wetlands have been extensively modified and degraded. In this human-dominated landscape, shorebirds sometimes aggregate in artificial wetlands associated with human production activities including agriculture, aquaculture and salt production. However, it is unknown whether artificial habitat use is widespread by shorebirds across the flyway, if such habitats could help to offset negative population trends, or how artificial habitats should be managed alongside natural habitats to achieve conservation outcomes. This thesis investigates the use of artificial and natural habitats by shorebirds in heavily developed coastal regions of the East Asian-Australasian Flyway, and suggests conservation and management actions in this setting. Chapter 2 presents the first large-scale review of coastal artificial habitat use by shorebirds in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway. Analysing data from multiple monitoring programs and the literature, it shows that 83 shorebird species have occurred on more than 170 artificial sites of eight different land uses throughout the flyway, including 36 species in internationally important numbers. However, occurrence and foraging on artificial habitats is uneven among species, and different land uses support varying abundances and species diversity. -
Evo01315.Pdf
Evolution. 48(21. 1994. pp. 327-350 HISTORICAL EXAMINATION OF DELAYED PLUMAGE MATURAnON IN THE SHOREBIRDS (AVES: CHARADRIIFORMES) PH1uPc. CHu Museum ofZoology and Department ofBiology, University ofMichigan, Ann Arbor. Michigan 48109 Abstract.- Delayed plumage maturation refers to the presence ofnon adultlike immature plumages (juvenal plumage excluded). It is usually considered the result of selection for distinctive first winter or first-summer appearance. In the present study, evolution ofdelayed plumage maturation is examined in the shorebirds: the sandpipers, plovers, gulls, and their allies. Nine plumage maturation characters were identified, and theirstates were superimposed onto topologies generated during two recent investigations ofshorebird relationships (Sibley and Ahlquist; revised Strauch). The characters were then optimized so as to assign character states to interior nodes of the trees in the most parsimonious way. Reconstructionsofcharacterevolution on six ofthe shortest revisedStrauchtrees were ambiguous with respect to delayed plumage maturation in the hypothetical ancestral shorebird. If plumage maturation was not delayed in the shorebird ancestor, optimization indicated that delay appeared when nonadultlike juvenal feathers were acquired. In contrast, on the single Sibley and Ahlquist tree, absence ofdelayed plumage maturation in the shorebird ancestor was indicated unambigu ously, with three evolutionary novelties (nonadultlike juvenal feathers, seasonal plumage change, and a reduced first-spring molt) implicated -
Pan-American Shorebird Program Shorebird Marking Protocol
Shorebird Marking Protocol – April 2016 Pan American Shorebird Program Shorebird Marking Protocol - April 2016 - Endorsed by: Shorebird Marking Protocol – April 2016 Lesley-Anne Howes, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), Ottawa, ON, Canada, Sophie Béraud, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Ottawa, ON, Canada, and Véronique Drolet-Gratton, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Ottawa, ON, Canada. In consultation with: (In alphabetical order) Brad Andres, US Shorebird Conservation Plan, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Lakewood CO USA Yves Aubry, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Quebec QC, Canada Rúben Dellacasa, Aves Argentinas, BirdLife International en Argentina, Buenos Aires, Argentina Christian Friis, Canadian Wildlife Service, ECCC, Toronto ON, Canada Nyls de Pracontal, Groupe d’Étude et de Protection des Oiseaux en Guyane (GEPOG), Cayennne, Guyane Cheri Gratto-Trevor, Prairie and Northern Wildlife Research Centre, ECCC, Saskatoon SK, Canada Richard Johnston, Asociación Calidris, Cali, Colombia and CWE, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver BC, Canada Kevin S. Kalasz, Delaware Division of Fish and Wildlife, DNREC, Smyrna DE, USA Richard Lanctot, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage AK, USA Sophie Maille, Groupe d’Étude et de Protection des Oiseaux en Guyane (GEPOG), Cayennne, Guyane David Mizrahi, New Jersey Audubon Society, Cape May Court House NJ, USA Bruce Peterjohn, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel MD, USA Eveling Tavera Fernandez, Centro de Ornitología y Biodiversidad