On the Shoulders of Giants.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
ANTONY ANTONIOU (OSINT Security Analyst)
EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE ACADEMY (EIA) E-BOOK No. 1, MAY 2013 ANTONY ANTONIOU (OSINT Security Analyst) OPEN SOURCE INFORMATION, THE FUTURE OF INTELLIGENCE Copyright: Research Institute for European and American Studies (RIEAS) EUROPEAN INTELLIGENCE ACADEMY E-BOOK No. 1 MAY 2013 OPEN SOURCE INFORMATION, THE FUTURE OF INTELLIGENCE ANTONY ANTONIOU (OSINT Security Analyst) Preface. People from ancient times to our days had understood the importance of information and the significant role that valid information can play in all fields of human activities (politics, economy, during wars etc). References to spies, and their methods – techniques and means that they used can be found in historical texts from antiquity until today, also known theorists of war have addressed and reported (in their writings), the importance of information and the necessity of an enemy misinformation (we will mention two of them of Carl Von Clausewitz1 and Sun - Tzu2). The intelligence services began to take shape during the Second World War. Pioneers at the “intelligence field” were the Germans (in espionage, cryptography - cryptology, propaganda and generally speaking at the development of the appropriate techniques – methods and instruments – means), followed by British. Americans because of their non-participation in the war had left behind in the development of techniques and means for collecting and processing information. This changed after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor3 and the American entry into the war4. The USA intelligence 1 Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz (1 July 1780 – 16 November 1831): was a German-Prussian soldier and military theorist who stressed the "moral" (in modern terms, psychological) and political aspects of war. -
Logical Fallacies, Long Lost Art of Rhetoric I Cheat Sheet by Jorgejuan007
Logical Fallacies, Long Lost Art of Rhetoric I Cheat Sheet by Jorge Juan (jorgejuan007) via cheatography.com/35958/cs/11445/ Definition Mindmap A fallacy is the use of invalid or faulty reasoning. Some fallacies are committed intenti onally to manipulate or persuade by deception, while others are committed uninten tio nally due to careles sness or ignorance Aristotle was the first to systema tize logical errors into a list, as being able to refute an opponent's thesis is one way of winning an argument Richard Whately defines a fallacy broadly as, "any argument, or apparent argument, which professes to be decisive of the matter at hand, while in reality it is not" https:/ /en .wi kip edi a.or g/ wik i/L ist _of _fa lla cies Formal fallacies The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the Appeal to Takes something for granted because it would probably easiest person to fool probab‐ be the case Something can go wrong Richard P. Feynman ility (premise). Therefore, something will go wrong (invalid conclus ion) Types of Fallacies Argument Aka fallacy fallacy, assumes that if an argument is Formal An error in logic in the argument's form. from fallaci ous, then the conclusion is false If P, then Q. Non Sequiturs fallacy P is a fallacious argument. Therefore, Q Propositional fallacies is false Quantif ica tion fallacies Syllogi stic fallacies Informal Reasons other than structu ral, require examin‐ ation of the argument's content Faulty general iza tions Red herring fallacies Condi tional or Arguments disregard or confusion questio nable Other systems of classif ica tion The most famous are those of Francis Bacon and J. -
Michael Eisen's Angry, Hypocrisy Drenched Assault on Informed
Michael Eisen's Angry, Hypocrisy Drenched Assault on Informed Consent using Massive Fallacious Reasoning while Ironically Brandishing the Banner of "Science" (c) Copyright 2012 David Dilworth (Eisen may have set a New World Record by committing Six Logical Fallacies with a Single Sentence.) The Genetically modified (GMO) food conflict surfaced in California where Food Safety proponents have put GMO food labeling on the November 2012 ballot so consumers can make an informed choice. GMO manufacturing corporations including Monsanto oppose labeling. Though I'd written a letter to a British researcher about iti the GMO campaign hadn't really caught my attention until I ran across an article, or more accurately found an article that ran over me and rational discourse. Entitled "The anti-GMO campaign's dangerous war on science"ii it is written by a genetic researcher in California named Michael Eisen claiming to support Open Science. The article caught my attention because I've been helping work for good science for a few decades, I'm aware of real attacks on science philosophy and credibility and I am a bit familiar with environmental impacts iii - so sounds good right ? Wow, was I ever in for a disturbing surprise. With deeply profound irony an "infuriated" Eisen claims he's fighting to defend science ("My vested interest here is science, and what I write here, I write to defend it"). Instead his article assaults and batters science reasoning and logic so relentlessly I had to set it aside for a few days to recover from my shocked dismay. "Well I'm angry, making sense gets in the way." "Coupling" British TV seriesiv If I'd found so much as one valid electronic breath defending science methodology, reasoning or logic in the article I wouldn't have written this. -
Editorial Archive-May-August 2011
The Lairds of Learning George Monbiot 31 August 2011 Who are the most ruthless capitalists in the Western world? Whose monopolistic practices makes WalMart look like a corner shop and Rupert Murdoch look like a socialist? You won’t guess the answer in a month of Sundays. While there are plenty of candidates, my vote goes not to the banks, the oil companies or the health insurers, but – wait for it – to academic publishers. Theirs might sound like a fusty and insignificant sector. It is anything but. Of all corporate scams, the racket they run is most urgently in need of referral to the competition authorities. Everyone claims to agree that people should be encouraged to understand science and other academic research. Without current knowledge, we cannot make coherent democratic decisions. But the publishers have slapped a padlock and a Keep Out sign on the gates. You might resent Murdoch’s paywall policy, in which he charges £1 for 24 hours of access to the Times and Sunday Times. But at least in that period you can read and download as many articles as you like. Reading a single article published by one of Elsevier’s journals will cost you $31.50(1). Springer charges Eur34.95(2), Wiley-Blackwell, $42(3). Read ten and you pay ten times. And the journals retain perpetual copyright. You want to read a letter printed in 1981? That’ll be $31.50(4). Of course, you could go into the library (if it still exists). But they too have been hit by cosmic fees. -
Electromagnetic and Neurological Technologies
International Campaign To End Human Rights Violations Involving Classified New Weapons of Mass Destruction: Electromagnetic and Neurological Technologies April 1999 with 2000 update By Cheryl Welsh copyright Table of Contents In memory of two victims who have died fighting: Paul Schaefer and Carol Sterling Introduction • A note of gratitude • About Cahra • About the author • In memory of two victims who have died fighting: Paul Schaefer Carol Sterling Chapter 1. The Victims • Who are victims of electromagnetic nonconsensual experimentation? • Victim claims with comparisons to unclassified information • Microwave hearing : Government documents reveal history of an intelligence tool • Frequently asked question: How can one person hear microwave hearing while a person nearby cannot? • Victims describe more symptoms with comparisons to science and military articles • In addition to experimentation, it is a surveillance and political weapon and victims report being systematically discredited • How many victims allege electromagnetic targeting? • Russian groups similar to Cahra, with over 1,000 alleged Russian mind control victims • An explanation: making the connection between cold war mentality and victim’s allegations • Sloppy vs. accurate news coverage: get the facts • The medical and psychiatric community’s response to victim’s claims • Mental illness: the government’s cover story for illegal experimentation • Example: Army document, low power microwaves Chapter 2. Why are victims targeted? Chapter 3. Scientists and victims claim same warnings and predictions • Section 1. Victim stereo-type • Section 2. Top scientists warn of mind control technology • Predictions of future technology Chapter 4. Human Experimentation • The history of government illegal experimentation: No codification of the Nuremberg Code or penalties under U.S. -
Accepted Manuscript1.0
Nonlinear World – Journal of Interdisciplinary Nature Published by GVP – Prof. V. Lakshmikantham Institute for Advanced Studies and GVP College of Engineering (A) About Journal: Nonlinear World is published in association with International Federation of Nonlinear Analysts (IFNA), which promotes collaboration among various disciplines in the world community of nonlinear analysts. The journal welcomes all experimental, computational and/or theoretical advances in nonlinear phenomena, in any discipline – especially those that further our ability to analyse and solve the nonlinear problems that confront our complex world. Nonlinear World will feature papers which demonstrate multidisciplinary nature, preferably those presented in such a way that other nonlinear analysts can at least grasp the main results, techniques, and their potential applications. In addition to survey papers of an expository nature, the contributions will be original papers demonstrating the relevance of nonlinear techniques. Manuscripts should be submitted to: Dr. J Vasundhara Devi, Associate Director, GVP-LIAS, GVP College of Engineering (A), Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam – 530048 Email: [email protected] Subscription Information 2017: Volume 1 (1 Issue) USA, India Online Registration at www.nonlinearworld.com will be made available soon. c Copyright 2017 GVP-Prof. V. Lakshmikantham Insitute of Advanced Studies ISSN 0942-5608 Printed in India by GVP – Prof. V. Lakshmikantham Institute for Advanced Studies, India Contributions should be prepared in accordance with the ‘‘ Instructions for Authors} 1 Nonlinear World Honorary Editors Dr. Chris Tsokos President of IFNA, Executive Director of USOP, Editor in Chief, GJMS, IJMSM, IJES, IJMSBF Dr. S K Sen Director, GVP-LIAS, India Editor in Chief Dr. J Vasundhara Devi Dept. of Mathematics, GVPCE(A) and Associate Director, GVP-LIAS, India Editorial Board Dr. -
List of Fallacies
List of fallacies For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common if>). The following fallacies involve inferences whose misconceptions. correctness is not guaranteed by the behavior of those log- ical connectives, and hence, which are not logically guar- A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric anteed to yield true conclusions. Types of propositional fallacies: which undermines an argument’s logical validity or more generally an argument’s logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. • Affirming a disjunct – concluding that one disjunct of a logical disjunction must be false because the These are commonly used styles of argument in convinc- other disjunct is true; A or B; A, therefore not B.[8] ing people, where the focus is on communication and re- sults rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be • Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an in- used whether the point being advanced is correct or not. dicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[8] 1 Formal fallacies • Denying the antecedent – the consequent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be false because the antecedent is false; if A, then B; not A, therefore Main article: Formal fallacy not B.[8] A formal fallacy is an error in logic that can be seen in the argument’s form.[1] All formal fallacies are specific types 1.2 Quantification fallacies of non sequiturs. A quantification fallacy is an error in logic where the • Appeal to probability – is a statement that takes quantifiers of the premises are in contradiction to the something for granted because it would probably be quantifier of the conclusion. -
Edmond Vanmarie the University of Leeds Department of Sociology and Social Policy Division of History and Philosophy of Science
Re-presenting herbal medicine as phytotherapy: a strategy of professionalisation through the formation of a 'scientific' medicine. Edmond VanMarie Submitted in accordancewith the requirementsfor the degree of PhD The University of Leeds Department of Sociology and Social Policy & Division of History and Philosophy of Science in the School of Philosophy Submitted in March 2002 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. Acknowledgments This work is not solely mine. Without the willingness of many medical herbalists to give me their considerationand time I would not have had their responsesto consider and analyse. For that I reiterate my personal thanks and record them here. Mention must also be made of the institutional representatives who were most helpful, and special thanks to the medical herbalists in the Leeds area who were also helpful in refining and clarifying my thoughts at the beginning of research. Any work of this nature can never be done alone. Financially, the assistance of a Research Scholarship from the University of Leeds gave me the opportunity to pursue this research. Cognitively, discussion with fellow researchers at conferences and less formal meetings has been most welcome. Finally (and motivationally), without the very patient support and guidance of Drs. Geof Mercer and Graeme Gooday I would not have maintained a clear thread of thought: I have been fortunate in having supervisors who performed their duties in the most literal meaning of 'supervisor' - keeping a watchful eye over all, seeing much more than I could, and quietly suggesting the optimum course of action. -
Machines Who Think
Machines Who Think FrontMatter.pmd 1 1/30/2004, 12:15 PM Other books by the author: Familiar Relations (novel) Working to the End (novel) The Fifth Generation (with Edward A. Feigenbaum) The Universal Machine The Rise of the Expert Company (with Edward A. Feigenbaum and H. Penny Nii) Aaron’s Code The Futures of Women (with Nancy Ramsey) FrontMatter.pmd 2 1/30/2004, 12:15 PM Machines Who Think A Personal Inquiry into the History and Prospects of Artificial Intelligence Pamela McCorduck A K Peters, Ltd. Natick, Massachusetts FrontMatter.pmd 3 1/30/2004, 12:15 PM Editorial, Sales, and Customer Service Office A K Peters, Ltd. 63 South Avenue Natick, MA 01760 www.akpeters.com Copyright © 2004 by A K Peters, Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. “Artificial Intelligence”. Copyright (c) 1993, 1967, 1963 by Adrienne Rich, from COLLECTED EARLY POEMS: 1950-1970 by Adrienne Rich. Used by permission of W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McCorduck, Pamela, 1940- Machines who think : a personal inquiry into the history and prospects of artificial intelligence / Pamela McCorduck.–2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56881-205-1 1. Artificial intelligence–History. I. Title. Q335.M23 2003 006.3’09–dc21 2003051791 Printed in Canada 08 07 06 05 04 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 FrontMatter.pmd 4 1/30/2004, 12:43 PM To W.J.M., whose energetic curiosity was always a delight and, at the last, a wonder. -
Argument from Repetition: It Works Again and Again - Logic Series | Academy 4 Social Change
Argument From Repetition: It Works Again and Again - Logic Series | Academy 4 Social Change Argument From Repetition: Lesson Plan Topic Argument from repetition is a logical fallacy in which an argument or premise is stated and restated until no opposition cares to discuss it any more. Since no one is speaking out against this claim, it appears as if everyone agrees with it. Argument from repetition is also called argumentum ad nauseam and argumentum ad infinitum. Possible subjects/classes Time needed English, Social Studies, Psychology, Debate/Public Speaking, 30-45 minutes Government/Politics Video link: https://academy4sc.org/topic/argument-from-repetition-it-works-again-and-again / Objective: What will students know/be able to do at the end of class? Students will be able to... ● Define argument from repetition. ● Explain the difference between outward agreement and inward approval, and provide reasons for why the two might not match up. ● Identify and avoid arguments from repetition in their own debates. Key Concepts & Vocabulary Repetition, Logical fallacy, Proof by assertion* Materials Needed Worksheet (optional activity) Before you watch Argument From Repetition: It Works Again and Again - Logic Series | Academy 4 Social Change Poll the class : Read the following scenario to the class: You have been discussing with your boss Bill why his new advertising campaign won’t work for the past thirty-two minutes. This was supposed to be a quick explanation, definitely under five minutes, but every time you bring up a flaw he’ll say some variant of, “but it has to be a success: this is the best campaign.” You planned to have taken your lunch break fifteen minutes ago. -
Intentional Seekers Seek Truth
Intentional Seekers Seek Truth St. Dominic’s November 2014 Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it. Blaise Pascal 1 Intentional Seekers Overview What do you mean by Intentional Seeker? Last year at St. Dominic’s we focused on Intentional Discipleship. It was an opportunity to explore what it means to be a disciple of Jesus Christ, and to become more intentional about discipleship. Let’s face it, before we can truly be disciples we must acknowledge and engage barriers that prevent us from starting the journey. We all have barriers! The question is not whether or not we have barriers, it is whether we are willing to seek ways to overcome those barriers. This series is a way we can all explore some of the most common barriers present in our own lives and in the lives of those around us. What is asked of me? First, pick up a booklet at St. Dominic’s each month and follow along. If you can, attend one of the Explore sessions (everyone is welcome) offered each month. If you want to go deeper, sign up for a Small Christian Community. Small communities will meet twice a month to discuss. We hope to be able to offer committed small communities and drop‐in small communities as we get a better understanding of people’s interested. Please see the back cover for specific dates. When did the Intentional Seeker initiative start? St. Dominic’s kicked off the Intentional Seeker initiative in September 2014. -
Key Concepts in Public Archaeology
KEY CONCEPTS This textbook provides a broad overview of the key concepts in public KEY CONCEPTS archaeology, a research field that examines the relationship between archaeology and the public, in both theoretical and practical terms. While based on the long-standing programme of undergraduate and graduate teaching in public archaeology at UCL’s Institute of Archaeology, the IN PUBLIC book also takes into account the growth of scholarship and pedagogy in public archaeology around the world. It seeks to clarify what exactly ‘public archaeology’ is by promoting an inclusive, socially and politically IN engaged vision of the discipline. PUBLIC ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY Written for students and practitioners, the individual chapters provide textbook-level introductions to the themes, theories and controversies that connect archaeology to wider society. From subjects as varied as the trade Edited by in illicit antiquities to the economics of public archaeology and the use of digital media in public engagement the book provides an overview of Gabriel Moshenska the key concepts in the field, and points readers to the most relevant case studies and learning resources to aid their further study. Gabriel Moshenska is Senior Lecturer in Public Archaeology at UCL. He studied his BSc, MA, PhD and held a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Research Fellowship at the UCL Institute of Archaeology. He has published numerous books and articles on topics including the history of archaeology, the archaeology of the Second World War in Gabriel Moshenska by Edited