DOCSLIB.ORG

An HDF-EOS and Data Formatting Primer for the ECS Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An HDF-EOS and Data Formatting Primer for the ECS Project 175-WP-001-002 An HDF-EOS and Data Formatting Primer for the ECS Project White Paper March 2001 Prepared Under Contract NAS5-60000 RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER E. M. Taaheri /s/ 3-1-2001 David Wynne, Abe Taaheri Date EOSDIS Core System Project SUBMITTED BY Larry Klein /s/ 2-28-2001 Darryl Arrington, Manager Toolkit Date Larry Klein, Manager Toolkit EOSDIS Core System Project Raytheon Company Upper Marlboro, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Abstract This document is a release of a primer manual for using the Hierarchical Data Format (HDF) and extensions (HDF-EOS) in Earth Observing System (EOS), Version 1 and later. We confine our discussion in this document to HDF V4 and the versions of HDF-EOS (V2), which are based on that version of HDF. A new version of HDF (V5) has been released. Additional material for HDF5 and versions of HDF-EOS, based on HDF5 will be provided in a separate document. Comments and suggestions should be sent to: Larry Klein Emergent Information Technologies 9315 Largo Dr. West, Suite 250 Largo, MD 20774 USA Email: [email protected] Phone: (301) 925-0764 Fax: (301) 925-0321 Keywords: HDF, HDF-EOS, Swath, Grid, Point, Data Formats, Metadata, Standard Data Products, Disk Formats, Browse iii 175-WP-001-002 This page intentionally left blank. iv 175-WP-001-002 Table of Contents Abstract 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document.......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Organization of this Document .................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 HDF and EOS: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 HDF and EOS: General Philosophy........................................................................... 1-3 2. An Introduction to HDF 2.1 HDF Concepts........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Overview of the NCSA HDF Library ........................................................................ 2-2 2.2.1 The Scientific Dataset Interfaces (DFSD, SD)................................................ 2-4 2.2.2 The Vdata Interfaces (VS, VSQ, VF)............................................................. 2-5 2.2.3 Vgroup interface (V)...................................................................................... 2-6 2.3 Overview of the HDF Disk Format............................................................................ 2-7 2.3.1 The HDF File Header..................................................................................... 2-7 2.3.2 The HDF Directory........................................................................................ 2-7 2.3.3 HDF Data Descriptors.................................................................................... 2-8 2.3.4 HDF Groups ..................................................................................................2-11 2.3.5 HDF Scientific Datasets.................................................................................2-14 2.3.6 HDF Vdatas ...................................................................................................2-16 2.3.7 HDF Extended Tags.......................................................................................2-17 2.4 HDF Examples ..........................................................................................................2-18 2.4.1 8-bit Raster Image Output ..............................................................................2-18 2.4.2 8-bit Raster Image with Palette Output...........................................................2-19 2.4.3 8-bit Raster Image with Palette Input .............................................................2-19 v 175-WP-001-002 2.4.6 Scientific Data Set Output..............................................................................2-20 2.4.7 Scientific Data Set Input ................................................................................2-21 3. HDF-EOS V2 3.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 HDF and HDF-EOS File Formats.............................................................................. 3-1 3.2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Structure of an HDF-EOS File ....................................................................... 3-2 3.3 HDF-EOS Library Functionality................................................................................ 3-5 3.3.1 Point Data Interface ....................................................................................... 3-6 3.3.2 Swath Interface ..............................................................................................3-10 3.3.3 Grid Interface.................................................................................................3-27 4. Related Topics 4.1 Introduction............................................................................................................... 4-1 4.2 ECS Metadata and the Science Data Processing Toolkit ............................................ 4-1 4.3 ECS Browse Specification......................................................................................... 4-6 4.3.1 Overview ....................................................................................................... 4-6 4.3.2 Browse Package Guidelines ........................................................................... 4-7 4.4 EOSView: An HDF-EOS ‘Browse Tool’.................................................................. 4-9 4.4.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4-9 4.4.2 EOSView Features........................................................................................4-10 List of Figures 2-1. HDF call to write an 8-bit image..................................................................................... 2-2 2-2. The HDF physical file format supports three levels of interaction ................................... 2-3 2-3. A Typical Vdata.............................................................................................................. 2-6 2-4. Organizational Levels for Dataset Shown in Table 2-8.................................................. 2-13 2-5. Example SDS................................................................................................................ 2-14 3-1. A Simple Point Data Example......................................................................................... 3-6 3-2. Recording Points Over Time........................................................................................... 3-7 vi 175-WP-001-002 3-3. Point Data from a Moving Platform ................................................................................ 3-7 3.4. A Typical Satellite Swath: Scanning Instrument............................................................ 3-10 3-5. A Swath Derived from a Profiling Instrument............................................................... 3-11 3-6. A “Normal” Dimension Map......................................................................................... 3-13 3-7. A “Backwards” Dimension Map ................................................................................... 3-13 3-8. HDF Objects Created by Program: SetupSwath.c.......................................................... 3-18 3-9. HDF Objects Created by Program: DefineField.c........................................................... 3-21 3-10. A Data Field in a Mercator-projected Grid .................................................................. 3-27 3-11. A Data Field in an Interrupted Goode’s Homolosine-Projected Grid ........................... 3-28 3-12. HDF Objects Created by Program: SetupGrid.c .......................................................... 3-34 4.1. Browse Package Data Objects ......................................................................................... 4-7 4-2. A Browse Data Package.................................................................................................. 4-8 4-3. EOSView Main Window .............................................................................................. 4-10 4-4. EOSView File Contents Window.................................................................................. 4-10 4-5. EOSView Image Display Window................................................................................ 4-11 4-6. EOSView Help Display ................................................................................................ 4-12 4-7. EOSView Table Display ............................................................................................... 4-13 4-8. EOSView Text Display................................................................................................. 4-13 List of Tables 2-1. The HDF Interfaces......................................................................................................... 2-4 2-2. Organization of the beginning of an HDF file ................................................................. 2-8 2-3. HDF data descriptor layout ............................................................................................. 2-8 2-4. Ranges of possible tag values.........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HDF-EOS Interface Based on HDF5, Volume 2: Function Reference Guide Was Prepared Under the EOSDIS Evolution and Development-2 Contract (NNG15HZ39C)
    This page intentionally left blank. Preface This document is a Users Guide for HDF-EOS (Hierarchical Data Format - Earth Observing System) library tools. The version described in this document is HDF-EOS Version 5.1.16. The software is based on HDF5, a new version of HDF provided by by The HDF Group. HDF5 is a complete rewrite of the earlier HDF4 version, containing a different data model and user interface. HDF-EOS V5.1.16 incorporates HDF5, and keeps the familier HDF4-based interface. There are a few exceptions and these exceptions are described in this document. Note that the major functional difference is that Version 5.1.16 of the HDF-EOS library is a thread-safe. HDF is the scientific data format standard selected by NASA as the baseline standard for EOS. This Users Guide accompanies Version 5.1.16 software, which is available to the user community on the EDHS1 server. This library is aimed at EOS data producers and consumers, who will develop their data into increasingly higher order products. These products range from calibrated Level 1 to Level 4 model data. The primary use of the HDF-EOS library will be to create structures for associating geolocation data with their associated science data. This association is specified by producers through use of the supplied library. Most EOS data products which have been identified, fall into categories of Point, Grid, Swath or Zonal Average structures, the latter two of which are implemented in the current version of the library. Services based on geolocation information will be built on HDF-EOS structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model
    Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model With Mappings to ACE Requirements for the General Availability User Environment Capabilities Release Version 1.1 Version 1.0: Bob Tomlinson, John Cerutti, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Version 1.1: Manuel Vigil, Jeffrey Johnson, Karen Haskell, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Prepared by the Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scale (ACES), a partnership of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. Approved for public release, unlimited dissemination LA-UR-12-24015 July 2012 Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Disclaimer Unless otherwise indicated, this information has been authored by an employee or employees of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC. (LANS), operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this information. The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. Neither the Government nor LANS makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the use of this information. Bob Tomlinson – Los Alamos National Laboratory John H. Cerutti – Los Alamos National Laboratory Robert A. Ballance – Sandia National Laboratories Karen H. Haskell – Sandia National Laboratories (Editors) Cray, LibSci, and PathScale are federally registered trademarks. Cray Apprentice2, Cray Apprentice2 Desktop, Cray C++ Compiling System, Cray Fortran Compiler, Cray Linux Environment, Cray SHMEM, Cray XE, Cray XE6, Cray XT, Cray XTm, Cray XT3, Cray XT4, Cray XT5, Cray XT5h, Cray XT5m, Cray XT6, Cray XT6m, CrayDoc, CrayPort, CRInform, Gemini, Libsci and UNICOS/lc are trademarks of Cray Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • EOS: a Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems
    c EOS: A Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems. * (hASA-CR-18G971) EOS: A PbCJECZ 10 187-26577 INVESTIGATE TEE CESIGI AND CCES!I&CCIXOti OF GEBL-1IIBE DISZEIEOTEO EWBEECIC CEERATIN6 SPSTEI!!S Bid-Year lieport, 1QE7 (Illinois Unclas Gniv.) 246 p Avail: AlIS BC All/!!P A01 63/62 00362E8 Principal Investigator: R. H. Campbell. Research Assistants: Ray B. Essick, Gary Johnston, Kevin Kenny, p Vince Russo. i Software Systems Research Group University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Computer Science 1304 West Springfield Avenue Urbana, Illinois 61801-2987 (217) 333-0215 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction. ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Choices .................................................................................................................................... 1 3. CLASP .................................................................................................................................... 2 4. Path Pascal Release ................................................................................................................. 4 5. The Choices Interface Compiler ................................................................................................ 4 8. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 ABSTRACT: Project EOS is studying the problems
    [Show full text]
  • The Intel Paragon
    Operating system and network support for high-performance computing Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Guedes Neto, Dorgival Olavo Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 20:24:35 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/298757 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Computers in Research and Development at Langley WU 505-90-53 Research Center
    NASA Conference Publication 10159 3E_c97_ The Role of Computers in Research and W'h Development at Langley Research Center 0 Compiled by u_ I aO ,4" I ,_ o3 Carol D. Wieseman e_ N Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia I I I ,*" u'_ I,-tt_ U 0,, i _, t* 0 Z I Z_ 0 e,.l xO 0 UJ _) U.l CI ua t_U ;.3 ..I _,- I-- _[ Z C 0 _1" _ 0 ZZ_D I_. E IE I I.-- E) C_: L _E)Z C Z C)_ U_ Proceedings of a workshop sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C., and held at Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia June 15-16, 1994 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Langley Research Center • Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 I I October 1994 INTRODUCTION On June 15 - 16, 1994, the Computer Systems Technical Committee presented a workshop, "The Role of Computers in LARC R&D", at NASA Langley Research Center. The objectives of the 1994 Workshop were to inform the LARC community about the current software system and software practices being used at LARC. To meet these objectives, there were talks presented by members of the Langley community, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Old Dominion University and Hampton University. The workshop was organized in 10 sessions as follows: Software Engineering Software Engineering Standards, Methods, and CASE Tools Solutions of Equations Automatic Differentiation Mosaic and the World Wide Web Graphics & Image Processing System Design and Integration CAE Tools Languages Advanced Topics This document is a compilation of the presentations given at the workshop.
    [Show full text]
  • 19990019831.Pdf
    NASA/CP-l999-208757 January, 1999 NASA Ames Research Center orkshop Author: Catherine Schulbach NASA Ames Research Center Editors: Catherine Schulbach NASA Ames Research Center and Ellen Mata, Ratheon ITSS TABLE OF CONTENTS NASA HPCCPICAS Workshop Proceedings HPCCPEAS Ove~ew...................................................................................................... vii Catherine Schulbach, Manager, Computational Aerosciences Project Session I: Advanced Computer Algorithms and Methodology ........................................ 1 Adaptive Computation of Rotor-Blades in Hover ............................................................... 3 -8 Mustafa Dindar and David Kenwright, Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute Automated Development of Accurate Algorithms and Efficient Codes for Computational Aeroacoustics.. ................................................................................................................ .9 v John Goodrich and Rodger Dyson, NASA Lewis Research Center Pe$ormance Analysis of large-Scale Applications Based on Wavefront Algorithms.. ................15 -3 Adolfy Hoisie, Olaf Lubeck and Harvey Wasserrnan, Los Alarnos National Laboratory Virtual PetaJlop Simulation: Parallel Potential Solvers and New Integrators for Gravitational Systems.. ....................................................................................................................... 21 George Lake, Thomas Quinn, Derek C. Richardson and Joachim Stadel, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington The Kalman Filter and High
    [Show full text]
  • Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering
    ^I| report of the panel on Large Scale Computing in Science and Engineering Peter D. Lax, Chairman December 26,1982 REPORT OF THE PANEL ON LARGE SCALE COMPUTING IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING Peter D. Lax, Chairman fVV C- -/c..,,* V cui'-' -ku .A rr Under the sponsorship of I Department of Defense (DOD) National Science Foundation (NSF) rP TC i rp-ia In cooperation with Department of Energy (DOE) National Aeronautics and Space Adrinistration (NASA) December 26, 1982 This report does not necessarily represent either the policies or the views of the sponsoring or cooperating agencies. r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Report of the Panel on Large Scale Computing in Science'and Engineering Large scale computing is a vital component of science, engineering, and modern technology, especially those branches related to defense, energy, and aerospace. In the 1950's and 1960's the U. S. Government placed high priority on large scale computing. The United States became, and continues to be, the world leader in the use, development, and marketing of "supercomputers," the machines that make large scale computing possible. In the 1970's the U. S. Government slackened its support, while other countries increased theirs. Today there is a distinct danger that the U.S. will fail to take full advantage of this leadership position and make the needed investments to secure it for the future. Two problems stand out: Access. Important segments of the research and defense communities lack effective access to supercomputers; and students are neither familiar with their special capabilities nor trained in their use. Access to supercomputers is inadequate in all disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • The New SU User's Manual
    The New SU User's Manual John W. Stockwell, Jr. & Jack K. Cohen Version 3.2: August 2002 The Seismic Unix project is supported by these organizations: The Society of Exploration Geophysicists Center for Wave Phenomena Colorado School of Mines Golden, CO 80401, USA Past support was received from: The Gas Research Institute The CWP/SU Free Software Package: Legal Matters The following items pertain to the CWP/SU software available from the Colorado School of Mines anonymous ftp site at ftp.cwp.mines.edu(138.67.12.4), and the web site www.cwp.mines.edu/cwpcodes. Disclaimer: There are no guarantees, explicit or implicit, made by the Center for Wave Phenomena, the Colorado School of Mines, or any member of the aforesaid organizations, or by any contributor to this package, past, present, or future, regarding the accuracy, safety, usefulness, or any other quality or aspect of this software or any software derived from it. Copyright: Copyright (c) Colorado School of Mines, 1992-2002. All rights reserved. The CWP/SU Seismic Unix package is not public domain software, but it is available free under the following license: License: Permission to use, copy, and modify this software for any purpose within the guidelines set below, and without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies, and the name of the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to this software without specific, written prior permission from CSM. CSM makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook - Informations About Operating Systems Version: September 3, 2016 | Download
    eBook - Informations about Operating Systems Version: September 3, 2016 | Download: www.operating-system.org AIX Operating System (Unix) Internet: AIX Operating System (Unix) AmigaOS Operating System Internet: AmigaOS Operating System Android operating system Internet: Android operating system Aperios Operating System Internet: Aperios Operating System AtheOS Operating System Internet: AtheOS Operating System BeIA Operating System Internet: BeIA Operating System BeOS Operating System Internet: BeOS Operating System BSD/OS Operating System Internet: BSD/OS Operating System CP/M, DR-DOS Operating System Internet: CP/M, DR-DOS Operating System Darwin Operating System Internet: Darwin Operating System Debian Linux Operating System Internet: Debian Linux Operating System eComStation Operating System Internet: eComStation Operating System Symbian (EPOC) Operating System Internet: Symbian (EPOC) Operating System FreeBSD Operating System (BSD) Internet: FreeBSD Operating System (BSD) Gentoo Linux Operating System Internet: Gentoo Linux Operating System Haiku Operating System Internet: Haiku Operating System HP-UX Operating System (Unix) Internet: HP-UX Operating System (Unix) GNU/Hurd Operating System Internet: GNU/Hurd Operating System Inferno Operating System Internet: Inferno Operating System IRIX Operating System (Unix) Internet: IRIX Operating System (Unix) JavaOS Operating System Internet: JavaOS Operating System LFS Operating System (Linux) Internet: LFS Operating System (Linux) Linspire Operating System (Linux) Internet: Linspire Operating
    [Show full text]
  • Are We Witnessing the Spectre of an HPC Meltdown?
    Are We Witnessing the Spectre of an HPC Meltdown? Veronica´ G. Vergara Larrea, Michael J. Brim, Wayne Joubert, Swen Boehm, Matthew Baker, Oscar Hernandez, Sarp Oral, James Simmons, and Don Maxwell Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 Email: fvergaravg,brimmj,joubert,boehms,bakermb,oscar,oralhs,simmonsja,[email protected] Abstract—We measure and analyze the performance ob- applications that perform a large number of system calls served when running applications and benchmarks before and (e.g., I/O operations). Furthermore, the performance impacts after the Meltdown and Spectre fixes have been applied to the are expected to vary depending on the parallel file system Cray supercomputers and supporting systems at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF). Of particular interest used (e.g., GPFS vs Lustre). is the effect of these fixes on applications selected from the In this work, performance results obtained from user OLCF portfolio when running at scale. This comprehensive facing systems, including Cray supercomputers at the Oak study presents results from experiments run on Titan, Eos, Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) are presented. Cumulus, and Percival supercomputers at the OLCF. The This study includes experiments conducted on Titan (Cray results from this study are useful for HPC users running on Cray supercomputers, and serve to better understand the XK7), Eos (Intel Sandy Bridge Cray XC30), Cumulus (Intel impact that these two vulnerabilities have on diverse HPC Broadwell Cray XC40), and Percival (Intel Knights Landing workloads at scale. Cray XC40) supercomputers, as well as supporting systems. Keywords-high performance computing; performance analy- The applications and benchmarks used for these experiments sis; security vulnerabilities; Spectre; Meltdown; are selected from the acceptance test plans for each system.
    [Show full text]
  • Case of Windows, UNIX, Linux, Mac, Android and Ios
    International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) Volume 176 – No. 39, July 2020 A Comparative Study of Operating Systems: Case of Windows, UNIX, Linux, Mac, Android and iOS Akinlolu Adekotujo Adedoyin Odumabo Ademola Adedokun Olukayode Aiyeniko PhD Student PhD Student PhD Student Lecture II Computer Science Dept., Computer Science Dept., Computer Science Dept., Computer Science Dept., Lagos State University, Lagos State University, Lagos State University, Lagos State University, Nigeria Nigeria Nigeria Nigeria ABSTRACT held and even video game consoles use some type of Varieties of operating systems (OS) have emerged over the operating system. There are numerous types of operating years having different features and functionalities. systems in today’s ICT world. Mac Operating System Understanding the functionalities of each OS guides users’ designed and owned by Apple Inc., Windows by Microsoft decisions about the OS to install on their computers. In view Inc., Linux by Community, likewise Android by Google Inc. of this, the comparative analysis of different OS is needed to and others. provide details on the similarities and difference in recent Varieties of Operating Systems have emerged over the years types of OS vis-à-vis their strengths and weaknesses. This having different features and functionalities. Understanding paper focus on the comparative analysis of Windows, Unix, the functionalities of each OS guides users’ decisions about Linux, Mac, Android and iOS operating systems based on the the OS to install on their computers. In view of this the OS features and their strengths and weaknesses. A qualitative comparative analysis of different OS becomes inevitable. analysis of six different operating systems and result showed Thus the need arises for a comparative analysis that will give that Windows 10 had 0.04 malware file present while an overview of the similarities and difference in different Windows 7 machine was 0.08.
    [Show full text]
  • 00375150.Pdf
    LA-6456-MS InformalReport UC-32 CIC-14 REPORT COLLECTION Issued: December 1976 C3● REPRODUCTION COPY . m CRAY-I Evaluation Final Report by T. W. Keller scientific laboratory of the University of California LOS ALAMOS. NEW MEXICO 87545 An Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer UNITED STATES ENERGV RESEARCU AND DEvELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION CONTRACT W-740B-CNG. S6 * ? Publicationofthisreportdoesnotimplyendorsementoftheproductsdescribedherein. Printed in the United States of America. Available from National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Prim: Printed Copy $5.50 Microfiche $3.00 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Much of Chapter III is drawn from reports by P. Iwanchuk and L. Rudsinski, who performed the scalar performance evaluation with the able assis- tance of T. Montoya and J. Miller. J. Moore per- formed the disk studies and much of Chapter VI is extracted from his reports. The discussion on Computation and 1/0 Interference in the sane chap- ter closely follows a report by J. C. Browne (Visiting Staff Member). R. Tanner edited the manuscript with contributions from many readers and with the aid of the word processing section of group C-4. The vector performance studies (Chapter IV) were conducted by A. McKnight. Data reported in Chapter V was collected by N. Nagy and D. Buckner. T. Jordan, K. Witte, and A. Marusak performed the preliminary scalar per- formance test referenced in Chapter VIII. Many people reviewed the coding of the scalar perform- ance modules (Chapter III) , with special acknowl- ~—--- edgement due D. Lindsay of FEDSIM. Discussions _ ~th B. Buzbee, ”J. Worlton, “an~ F. Dorr helped >~m, deffne the scope of the evaluation under the time ~~~~...constraints~~ e -.
    [Show full text]