DOCSLIB.ORG

19990019831.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
19990019831.Pdf NASA/CP-l999-208757 January, 1999 NASA Ames Research Center orkshop Author: Catherine Schulbach NASA Ames Research Center Editors: Catherine Schulbach NASA Ames Research Center and Ellen Mata, Ratheon ITSS TABLE OF CONTENTS NASA HPCCPICAS Workshop Proceedings HPCCPEAS Ove~ew...................................................................................................... vii Catherine Schulbach, Manager, Computational Aerosciences Project Session I: Advanced Computer Algorithms and Methodology ........................................ 1 Adaptive Computation of Rotor-Blades in Hover ............................................................... 3 -8 Mustafa Dindar and David Kenwright, Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute Automated Development of Accurate Algorithms and Efficient Codes for Computational Aeroacoustics.. ................................................................................................................ .9 v John Goodrich and Rodger Dyson, NASA Lewis Research Center Pe$ormance Analysis of large-Scale Applications Based on Wavefront Algorithms.. ................15 -3 Adolfy Hoisie, Olaf Lubeck and Harvey Wasserrnan, Los Alarnos National Laboratory Virtual PetaJlop Simulation: Parallel Potential Solvers and New Integrators for Gravitational Systems.. ....................................................................................................................... 21 George Lake, Thomas Quinn, Derek C. Richardson and Joachim Stadel, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington The Kalman Filter and High Performance Computing at NASA's id Data Assimilation Office (DAO)....................................................................................... 29 5 Peter M. Lyster, NASA Data Assimilation Office (DAO), and University of Maryland Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (ESSIC) ' G Session 2: Advanced Computer Algorithms and Methodology ....................................31 W+a@i&tf Towards the Large Eddy Simulation of Gas Turbine Spray Combustion Processes..................... 33 -6 Joseph C. Oefelein, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University Parallelization of lmplicit ADZ Solver FDL3DI Based on New Formulation of Thomas Algorithm ........................................................................................................... 35 - 7 Alex Povitsky, NASA Langley Research Center Miguel Visbal, Air Force Research Laboratory A Compact High-Order Unstructured Grids Method For The Solution Of Euler Equations.. ........................................................................................................ 41.-3 Ramesh K. Agarwal, National Institute for Aviation Research, Wichita State University David W. Halt, Ford Motor Company A Neural Network Aero Design System for Advanced Turbo-Engines....................................... 494 Jose M. Sanz, NASA Lewis Research Center, rT Session 3: Parallel System Software Technology ......................................................51- - The SGI/Cray T3E: Experiences and Insights ....................................................................... 53 - /o Lisa Hamet Bernard, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center The Metacenter Roadmap .................................................................................................59 - L/ Mary Hultquist and James Patton Jones, MRJ Technology Solutions NASA Ames Research Center The Programming Environment on a Beowulf Cluster........................................................... 65- /p Phil Merkey, Donald Becker, Erik Hendriks, CESDISJUSRA Multithreaded Programming in EARTH--Meeting the Challenges of High Per$ormance Computing ..........................................................................................67'/3 G. Heber and Guang R. Gao, University of Delaware R. Biswas, NASA Ames Research Center An Evaluation of Automatic Parallelization Tools................................................................ 73 -I$J M. Frurnkin, M. Hribar, H. Jin, A. Waheed and J. Yan, NASA Ames Research Center -1' An Experiment in Scientific Code Semantic Analysis .............................................................79 Mark Stewart, Dynacs Engineering Session 4: Applications for ParalleYDistributed Computers ............................... ..........85 30 Multistage Simulation of GE90 Turbofan Engine ............................................................87- /Q Mark Turner and Dave Topp, General Electric Aircraft Engines Joe Veres, NASA Lewis Research Center Application Of Multi-Stage Viscous Flow CFD Methods For Advanced Gas Turbine Engine Design And Development.. ...................................................................89 - f I Mani Subramanian and Paul Vitt, ASE Technologies David Cherry and Mark Turner, General Electric Aircraft Engines The Development of a Multi-Purpose 3-0 Relativistic Hydrodynamics Code............................. 91 - 18 F. Douglas Swesty, National Center for Supercomputing Applications and Department of Astronomy, University of Illinois Parallelization of the Physical-Space Statistical Analysis System (PSAS)................................. 93~~41 Jay Larson, Data Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Parallelizing OVERFLOW: Experiences, Lessons, Results ...................................................... 95 -2* Dennis Jespersen, NASA Ames Research Center ,r Session 5: Applications for ParalleVDistributed Computers ....................................... 101*~ Perj4ormance and Application of Parallel OVERFLOW Codes on Distributed and Shared Memory Platjorms.. ....................................................................... 103 -2 I M. Jahed Djomehri, Calspan Co., NASA Ames Research Center Yehia M. Rizk, NASA Ames Research Center MLP - A Simple Highly Scalable Approach to Parallelism for CFD...................................... 105 'd 2- James Taft, Sierra Software, NASA Ames Research Center Massively Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics Calculationsfor 3 Aerodynamics and Aerothermodynamics Applications.. ......................................................11 I -2 Jeffrey Payne and Basil Hassan, Sandia National Laboratories Session 6: Multidisciplinary Design and Applications............................................... 117 fl,f Development of An Earth System Model in High Pegormance Computing Environments., ............................................................................................ I 2 7 C.R. Mechoso, L.A. Drummond, J.D. Farrara and J.A. Spahr, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles Parallel Finite Element Computation of 3D Coupled Viscous Flow and Transport Processes.. ............................................................................................. -125 -2 3- Graham Carey, R. McLay, G. Bicken, W. Barth, S. Swift, ASE/EM Department, University of Texas at Austin, Engineering Overview of a Multidisciplinary HSCT Design Framework Using Medium-Fidelity Analysis Codes.. ........................................................................... -13342-b R. P. Weston, L. L. Green, A. 0. Salas, J. C. Townsend, J. L. Walsh, NASA Langley Research Center, /- Session 7: Multidisciplinary Design and Applications............................................... 135 -@P/1 Turbine Engine HP/LP Spool Analysis.. ............................................................................ 137*~' Ed Hall, Rolls-Royce Allison Parallel Aeroelastic Analysis Using ENSAERO and NASTRAN .............................................. 143 -2 8 Lloyd B. Eldred, Ph.D. and Chansup Byun, MCAT, NASA Ames Research Center Guru Guruswamy, NASA Ames Research Center Performance and Applications of ENSAERO-MPI on Scalable Computers............................. 149 02 7 Mehrdad Farhangnia,, MCAT, NASA Ames Research Center Guru Guruswamy, NASA Ames Research Center Chansup Byun, Sun Microsystems 0 OVERAERO-MPI: Parallel Overset Aeroelasticity Code.. .................................................... 151 ' Ken Gee, MCAT, NASA Ames Research Center Yehia Rizk, MCAT, NASA Ames Research Center Development and Validation of a Fast, Accurate and Cost-Effective Aeroservoelastic Method on Advanced Parallel Computing Systems....................................... 157 -3/ Sabine A. Goodwin and Pradeep Raj, Lockheed Martin Aeronautical Systems -- -@Mi! Session 8: DesignIEngineering Environments.. .....................................................I63 Zb- MOD Tool (Microwave Optics Design Tool)..................................................................... .1 65ed3 Daniel S. Katz, Vahraz Jamnejad, Tom Cwik, Andrea Borgioli, Paul L. Springer, Chuigang Fu and William A. Imbriale, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory An Object Oriented Framework for HSCT Design. .............................................................. 171 *jd Raj Sistla, Augustine R. Dovi and Philip Su, Computer Sciences Corporation National Cyde Program (NCP) Common analysis Tool for Aeropropulsion............................ 177 Gregory Follen, Cynthia Naiman and Austin Evans, NASA Lewis Research Center NCC - A Multidisciplinary DesigdAnalysis Tool for Combustion Systems ................................ 183 -2?'5F Nan-Suey Liu, NASA Lewis Research Center Angela Quealy, Dynacs Engineering, NASA Lewis Research Center Inlet-Compressor Analysis Using Coupled CFD Codes.. ...................................................... .I89 4 3b Gary Cole, NASA Lewis Research Center Ambady Suresh and Scott Townsend, Dynacs Engineering Aerospace Engineering Systems and the Advanced Design Technologies Testbed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HDF-EOS Interface Based on HDF5, Volume 2: Function Reference Guide Was Prepared Under the EOSDIS Evolution and Development-2 Contract (NNG15HZ39C)
    This page intentionally left blank. Preface This document is a Users Guide for HDF-EOS (Hierarchical Data Format - Earth Observing System) library tools. The version described in this document is HDF-EOS Version 5.1.16. The software is based on HDF5, a new version of HDF provided by by The HDF Group. HDF5 is a complete rewrite of the earlier HDF4 version, containing a different data model and user interface. HDF-EOS V5.1.16 incorporates HDF5, and keeps the familier HDF4-based interface. There are a few exceptions and these exceptions are described in this document. Note that the major functional difference is that Version 5.1.16 of the HDF-EOS library is a thread-safe. HDF is the scientific data format standard selected by NASA as the baseline standard for EOS. This Users Guide accompanies Version 5.1.16 software, which is available to the user community on the EDHS1 server. This library is aimed at EOS data producers and consumers, who will develop their data into increasingly higher order products. These products range from calibrated Level 1 to Level 4 model data. The primary use of the HDF-EOS library will be to create structures for associating geolocation data with their associated science data. This association is specified by producers through use of the supplied library. Most EOS data products which have been identified, fall into categories of Point, Grid, Swath or Zonal Average structures, the latter two of which are implemented in the current version of the library. Services based on geolocation information will be built on HDF-EOS structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model
    Cielo Computational Environment Usage Model With Mappings to ACE Requirements for the General Availability User Environment Capabilities Release Version 1.1 Version 1.0: Bob Tomlinson, John Cerutti, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Version 1.1: Manuel Vigil, Jeffrey Johnson, Karen Haskell, Robert A. Ballance (Eds.) Prepared by the Alliance for Computing at Extreme Scale (ACES), a partnership of Los Alamos National Laboratory and Sandia National Laboratories. Approved for public release, unlimited dissemination LA-UR-12-24015 July 2012 Los Alamos National Laboratory Sandia National Laboratories Disclaimer Unless otherwise indicated, this information has been authored by an employee or employees of the Los Alamos National Security, LLC. (LANS), operator of the Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. Government has rights to use, reproduce, and distribute this information. The public may copy and use this information without charge, provided that this Notice and any statement of authorship are reproduced on all copies. Neither the Government nor LANS makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any liability or responsibility for the use of this information. Bob Tomlinson – Los Alamos National Laboratory John H. Cerutti – Los Alamos National Laboratory Robert A. Ballance – Sandia National Laboratories Karen H. Haskell – Sandia National Laboratories (Editors) Cray, LibSci, and PathScale are federally registered trademarks. Cray Apprentice2, Cray Apprentice2 Desktop, Cray C++ Compiling System, Cray Fortran Compiler, Cray Linux Environment, Cray SHMEM, Cray XE, Cray XE6, Cray XT, Cray XTm, Cray XT3, Cray XT4, Cray XT5, Cray XT5h, Cray XT5m, Cray XT6, Cray XT6m, CrayDoc, CrayPort, CRInform, Gemini, Libsci and UNICOS/lc are trademarks of Cray Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • EOS: a Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems
    c EOS: A Project to Investigate the Design and Construction of Real-Time Distributed Embedded Operating Systems. * (hASA-CR-18G971) EOS: A PbCJECZ 10 187-26577 INVESTIGATE TEE CESIGI AND CCES!I&CCIXOti OF GEBL-1IIBE DISZEIEOTEO EWBEECIC CEERATIN6 SPSTEI!!S Bid-Year lieport, 1QE7 (Illinois Unclas Gniv.) 246 p Avail: AlIS BC All/!!P A01 63/62 00362E8 Principal Investigator: R. H. Campbell. Research Assistants: Ray B. Essick, Gary Johnston, Kevin Kenny, p Vince Russo. i Software Systems Research Group University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Computer Science 1304 West Springfield Avenue Urbana, Illinois 61801-2987 (217) 333-0215 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction. ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. Choices .................................................................................................................................... 1 3. CLASP .................................................................................................................................... 2 4. Path Pascal Release ................................................................................................................. 4 5. The Choices Interface Compiler ................................................................................................ 4 8. Summary ................................................................................................................................. 5 ABSTRACT: Project EOS is studying the problems
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,862,870 B2 Reddy Et Al
    USOO886287OB2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,862,870 B2 Reddy et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 14, 2014 (54) SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USPC .......... 713/152–154, 168, 170; 709/223, 224, MULTI-LEVELTAGGING OF ENCRYPTED 709/225 ITEMIS FOR ADDITIONAL SECURITY AND See application file for complete search history. EFFICIENT ENCRYPTED ITEM (56) References Cited DETERMINATION U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (75) Inventors: Anoop Reddy, Santa Clara, CA (US); 5,867,494 A 2/1999 Krishnaswamy et al. Craig Anderson, Santa Clara, CA (US) 5,909,559 A 6, 1999 SO (73) Assignee: Citrix Systems, Inc., Fort Lauderdale, (Continued) FL (US) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this patent is extended or adjusted under 35 CN 1478348 A 2, 2004 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. EP 1422.907 A2 5, 2004 (Continued) (21) Appl. No.: 13/337.735 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (22) Filed: Dec. 27, 2011 Australian Examination Report on 200728.1083 dated Nov.30, 2010. (65) Prior Publication Data (Continued) US 2012/O17387OA1 Jul. 5, 2012 Primary Examiner — Abu Sholeman (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Foley & Lardner LLP: Related U.S. Application Data Christopher J. McKenna (60) Provisional application No. 61/428,138, filed on Dec. (57) ABSTRACT 29, 2010. The present disclosure is directed towards systems and meth ods for performing multi-level tagging of encrypted items for (51) Int. Cl. additional security and efficient encrypted item determina H04L 9M32 (2006.01) tion. A device intercepts a message from a server to a client, H04L 2L/00 (2006.01) parses the message and identifies a cookie.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quadrics Network (Qsnet): High-Performance Clustering Technology
    Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Hot Interconnects (HotI'01), Palo Alto, California, August 2001. The Quadrics Network (QsNet): High-Performance Clustering Technology Fabrizio Petrini, Wu-chun Feng, Adolfy Hoisie, Salvador Coll, and Eitan Frachtenberg Computer & Computational Sciences Division Los Alamos National Laboratory ¡ fabrizio,feng,hoisie,scoll,eitanf ¢ @lanl.gov Abstract tegration into large-scale systems. While GigE resides at the low end of the performance spectrum, it provides a low-cost The Quadrics interconnection network (QsNet) con- solution. GigaNet, GSN, Myrinet, and SCI add programma- tributes two novel innovations to the field of high- bility and performance by providing communication proces- performance interconnects: (1) integration of the virtual- sors on the network interface cards and implementing differ- address spaces of individual nodes into a single, global, ent types of user-level communication protocols. virtual-address space and (2) network fault tolerance via The Quadrics network (QsNet) surpasses the above inter- link-level and end-to-end protocols that can detect faults connects in functionality by including a novel approach to and automatically re-transmit packets. QsNet achieves these integrate the local virtual memory of a node into a globally feats by extending the native operating system in the nodes shared, virtual-memory space; a programmable processor in with a network operating system and specialized hardware the network interface that allows the implementation of intel- support in the network interface. As these and other impor- ligent communication protocols; and an integrated approach tant features of QsNet can be found in the InfiniBand speci- to network fault detection and fault tolerance. Consequently, fication, QsNet can be viewed as a precursor to InfiniBand.
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Network and Channel-Based Storage
    High Performance Network and Channel-Based Storage Randy H. Katz Report No. UCB/CSD 91/650 September 1991 Computer Science Division (EECS) University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California 94720 (NASA-CR-189965) HIGH PERFORMANCE NETWORK N92-19260 AND CHANNEL-BASED STORAGE (California Univ.) 42 p CSCL 098 Unclas G3/60 0073846 High Performance Network and Channel-Based Storage Randy H. Katz Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California Berkeley, California 94720 Abstract: In the traditional mainframe-centered view of a computer system, storage devices are coupled to the system through complex hardware subsystems called I/O channels. With the dramatic shift towards workstation-based com- puting, and its associated client/server model of computation, storage facilities are now found attached to file servers and distributed throughout the network. In this paper, we discuss the underlying technology trends that are leading to high performance network-based storage, namely advances in networks, storage devices, and I/O controller and server architectures. We review several commercial systems and research prototypes that are leading to a new approach to high performance computing based on network-attached storage. Key Words and Phrases: High Performance Computing, Computer Networks, File and Storage Servers, Secondary and Tertiary Storage Device 1. Introduction The traditional mainframe-centered model of computing can be characterized by small numbers of large-scale mainframe computers, with shared storage devices attached via I/O channel hard- ware. Today, we are experiencing a major paradigm shift away from centralized mainframes to a distributed model of computation based on workstations and file servers connected via high per- formance networks.
    [Show full text]
  • An HDF-EOS and Data Formatting Primer for the ECS Project
    175-WP-001-002 An HDF-EOS and Data Formatting Primer for the ECS Project White Paper March 2001 Prepared Under Contract NAS5-60000 RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER E. M. Taaheri /s/ 3-1-2001 David Wynne, Abe Taaheri Date EOSDIS Core System Project SUBMITTED BY Larry Klein /s/ 2-28-2001 Darryl Arrington, Manager Toolkit Date Larry Klein, Manager Toolkit EOSDIS Core System Project Raytheon Company Upper Marlboro, Maryland This page intentionally left blank. Abstract This document is a release of a primer manual for using the Hierarchical Data Format (HDF) and extensions (HDF-EOS) in Earth Observing System (EOS), Version 1 and later. We confine our discussion in this document to HDF V4 and the versions of HDF-EOS (V2), which are based on that version of HDF. A new version of HDF (V5) has been released. Additional material for HDF5 and versions of HDF-EOS, based on HDF5 will be provided in a separate document. Comments and suggestions should be sent to: Larry Klein Emergent Information Technologies 9315 Largo Dr. West, Suite 250 Largo, MD 20774 USA Email: [email protected] Phone: (301) 925-0764 Fax: (301) 925-0321 Keywords: HDF, HDF-EOS, Swath, Grid, Point, Data Formats, Metadata, Standard Data Products, Disk Formats, Browse iii 175-WP-001-002 This page intentionally left blank. iv 175-WP-001-002 Table of Contents Abstract 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Document.......................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Organization of this Document .................................................................................. 1-1 1.3 HDF and EOS: Introduction ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 HDF and EOS: General Philosophy........................................................................... 1-3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • HIPPI Developments for CERN Experiments A
    VERSION OF: 5-Feb-98 10:15 HIPPI Developments for CERN experiments A. van Praag ,T. Anguelov, R.A. McLaren, H.C. van der Bij, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland. J. Bovier, P. Cristin Creative Electronic Systems, Geneva, Switzerland. M. Haben, P. Jovanovic, I. Kenyon, R. Staley University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K. D. Cunningham, G. Watson Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Bristol, U.K. B. Green, J. Strong Royal Hollaway and Bedford New College, U.K. Abstract HIPPI Standard, fast, simple, inexpensive; is this not a contradiction in terms? The High-Performance Parallel We have decided to use the High Performance Parallel Interface (HIPPI) is a new proposed ANSI standard, using a Interface (HIPPI) to implement these links. The HIPPI minimal protocol and providing 100 Mbyte/sec transfers over specification was started in the Los Alamos laboratory in distances up to 25 m. Equipment using this standard is 1989 and is now a proposed ANSI standard (X3T9/88-127, offered by a growing number of computer manufacturers. A X3T9.3/88-23, HIPPI PH) [1,2]. This standard allows commercially available HIPPI chipset allows low cost 100 Mbyte/sec synchronous data transfers between a "Source" implementations. In this article a brief technical introduction and a "Destination". Seen from the lowest level upwards the to the HIPPI will be given, followed by examples of planned HIPPI specification proposes a logical framing hierarchy applications in High Energy Physics experiments including where the smallest unit of data to be transferred, called a the present developments involving CERN: a detector "burst" has a standard size of 256 words of 32 bit or optional emulator, a risc processor based VME connection, a long 64 bit (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • PC Hardware Contents
    PC Hardware Contents 1 Computer hardware 1 1.1 Von Neumann architecture ...................................... 1 1.2 Sales .................................................. 1 1.3 Different systems ........................................... 2 1.3.1 Personal computer ...................................... 2 1.3.2 Mainframe computer ..................................... 3 1.3.3 Departmental computing ................................... 4 1.3.4 Supercomputer ........................................ 4 1.4 See also ................................................ 4 1.5 References ............................................... 4 1.6 External links ............................................. 4 2 Central processing unit 5 2.1 History ................................................. 5 2.1.1 Transistor and integrated circuit CPUs ............................ 6 2.1.2 Microprocessors ....................................... 7 2.2 Operation ............................................... 8 2.2.1 Fetch ............................................. 8 2.2.2 Decode ............................................ 8 2.2.3 Execute ............................................ 9 2.3 Design and implementation ...................................... 9 2.3.1 Control unit .......................................... 9 2.3.2 Arithmetic logic unit ..................................... 9 2.3.3 Integer range ......................................... 10 2.3.4 Clock rate ........................................... 10 2.3.5 Parallelism .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12: I/O: Metrics, a Little Queuing Theory, and Busses
    Lecture 12: I/O: Metrics, A Little Queuing Theory, and Busses Professor David A. Patterson Computer Science 252 Fall 1996 DAP.F96 1 Review: Disk Device Terminology Disk Latency = Queuing Time + Seek Time + Rotation Time + Xfer Time Order of magnitude times for 4K byte transfers: Seek: 12 ms or less Rotate: 4.2 ms @ 7200 rpm (8.3 ms @ 3600 rpm ) Xfer: 1 ms @ 7200 rpm (2 ms @ 3600 rpm) DAP.F96 2 Review: R-DAT Technology 2000 RPM Four Head Recording Helical Recording Scheme Tracks Recorded ±20° w/o guard band Read After Write Verify DAP.F96 3 Review: Automated Cartridge System STC 4400 8 feet 10 feet 6000 x 0.8 GB 3490 tapes = 5 TBytes in 1992 $500,000 O.E.M. Price 6000 x 20 GB D3 tapes = 120 TBytes in 1994 1 Petabyte (1024 TBytes) in 2000 DAP.F96 4 Review: Storage System Issues • Historical Context of Storage I/O • Secondary and Tertiary Storage Devices • Storage I/O Performance Measures • A Little Queuing Theory • Processor Interface Issues • I/O Buses • Redundant Arrarys of Inexpensive Disks (RAID) • ABCs of UNIX File Systems • I/O Benchmarks • Comparing UNIX File System Performance DAP.F96 5 Disk I/O Performance 300 Response Metrics: Time (ms) Response Time Throughput 200 100 0 0% 100% Throughput (% total BW) Queue Proc IOC Device Response time = Queue + Device Service time DAP.F96 6 Response Time vs. Productivity • Interactive environments: Each interaction or transaction has 3 parts: – Entry Time: time for user to enter command – System Response Time: time between user entry & system replies – Think Time: Time from response until user
    [Show full text]
  • Security Hardened Remote Terminal Units for SCADA Networks
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2008 Security hardened remote terminal units for SCADA networks. Jeff Hieb University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hieb, Jeff, "Security hardened remote terminal units for SCADA networks." (2008). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 615. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/615 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SECURITY HARDENED REMOTE TERMINAL UNITS FOR SCADA NETWORKS By Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb B.S., Furman University, 1992 B.A., Furman University, 1992 M.S., University of Louisville, 2004 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Computer Science and Computer Engineering J. B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2008 SECURITY HARDENED REMOTE TERMINAL UNITS FOR SCADA NETWORKS By Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb B.S., Furman University, 1992 B.A., Furman University, 1992 M.S., University of Louisville, 2004 A Dissertation Approved on February 26, 2008 By the following Dissertation Committee members Dr. James H. Graham, Dissertation Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25 N 4Chi008 Date: 2004-06-22
    ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25 N 4Chi008 Date: 2004-06-22 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25 INTERCONNECTION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT Secretariat: Germany (DIN) DOC TYPE: Administrative TITLE: Status of projects of SC25/WG 4, Chitose, Japan, 2004-06-22/24. SOURCE: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 25/WG 4 Convener PROJECT: All projects of SC 25/WG 4 STATUS: Agenda ACTION ID: FYI DUE DATE: n/a REQUESTED: For information ACTION MEDIUM: Open DISTRIBUTION: ITTF, JTC 1 Secretariat P-, L-, O-Members of SC 25 No of Pages: 08 (including cover) Page 1 of 8 Status of projects of WG 4, Chitose, Japan, 2004-06-22/24 6 Project 1.25.13.01.XX - Channel Interface Specifications: Fibre Distributed Data Interface (FDDI) 6.1. Project 1.25.13.01.03 - FDDI - Part 1: Physical Layer Protocol (PHY) [ISO 9314-1:1989] no action required 6.2. Project 1.25.13.01.04 - FDDI - Part 2: Media Access Control (MAC) [ISO 9314-2:1989] - - no action required 6.3. Project 1.25.13.01.05 - FDDI - Part 3: Physical Layer Medium Dependent (PMD) [ISO/IEC 9314-3:1990] no action required 6.4. Project 1.25.13.01.06 - FDDI - Part 4: Single-Mode Fibre Physical Layer Medium Dependent (SMF-PMD) [ISO/IEC 9314-4:1999] -- no action required 6.5. Project 1.25.13.01.07 - FDDI - Part 5: Hybrid Ring Control (HRC) [ISO/IEC 9314- 5:1995] no action required 6.6. Project 1.25.13.01.08 - FDDI - Part 6: Station Management (SMT) [ISO/IEC 9314- 6:1998] no action required 6.7.
    [Show full text]